Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2013 Aug 14;19(30):4935–4943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i30.4935

Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the region of CLDN2-MORC4 in relation to inflammatory bowel disease

Jan Söderman 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Elisabeth Norén 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Malin Christiansson 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Hanna Bragde 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Raphaele Thiébaut 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Jean-Pierre Hugot 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Curt Tysk 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Colm A O’Morain 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Miquel Gassull 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Yigael Finkel 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Jean-Frédéric Colombel 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Marc Lémann 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, Sven Almer 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17
PMCID: PMC3740423  PMID: 23946598

Abstract

AIM: To investigate a possible genetic influence of claudin (CLDN)1, CLDN2 and CLDN4 in the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS: Allelic association between genetic regions of CLDN1, CLDN2 or CLDN4 and patients with inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis were investigated using both a case-control study approach (one case randomly selected from each of 191 Swedish inflammatory bowel disease families and 333 controls) and a family-based study (463 non-Swedish European inflammatory bowel disease -families). A nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphism in MORC4, located on the same linkage block as CLDN2, was investigated for association, as were two novel CLDN2 single nucleotide polymorphism markers, identified by resequencing.

RESULTS: A single nucleotide polymorphism marker (rs12014762) located in the genetic region of CLDN2 was significantly associated to CD (case-control allelic OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.17-3.35, P = 0.007). MORC4 was present on the same linkage block as this CD marker. Using the case-control approach, a significant association (case control allelic OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.08-2.41, P = 0.018) was found between CD and a nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6622126) in MORC4. The association between the CLDN2 marker and CD was not replicated in the family-based study. Ulcerative colitis was not associated to any of the single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a variant of the CLDN2-MORC4 region predisposes to CD in a Swedish population.

Keywords: Crohn’s disease, Genetic predisposition, Inflammatory bowel disease, Single nucleotide polymorphism, Tight junctions


Core tip: Tight junction proteins are key components in the regulation of paracellular permeability and therefore we considered claudin genes as candidate genes in the study. Association was identified between a single nucleotide polymorphism marker (rs12014762) in the CLDN2-MORC4 region and the occurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD) in a Swedish population. Additionally, a nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6622126) in MORC4 was associated to CD. Our findings add further support for a genetically impaired intestinal epithelial barrier as one predisposing factor in the etiology of CD.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and, in the absence of a confident diagnosis, unclassified colitis (IBD-U). Susceptibility to IBD and the broad spectrum of phenotypic expressions depends on contributions from environmental factors and a genetic predisposition. Several etiological factors have been suggested, including the presence of specific strains of commensal enteric bacteria, defective bacterial killing, aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses and an impaired intestinal barrier[1]. Consistent with this, several genetic associations in IBD have been described[2-8].

Both CD and UC have been associated with an increase in intestinal permeability[9-11]. Based on findings of an increased intestinal permeability among healthy first-degree relatives to CD patients, a role for a tight junction (TJ) based genetic contribution to permeability changes has been suggested as a predisposing susceptibility factor for CD[12]. This suggestion has been contradicted by other studies[13-15]. However, by defining a normal range of intestinal permeability in healthy controls, a subgroup of healthy first-degree relatives to CD patients with increased intestinal permeability has been identified[16]. An increased permeability response to acetylsalicylic acid has been observed in CD patients and their relatives, indicating hereditary factors underlying this responsiveness[14]. An increased permeability may be primary or a consequence of subclinical intestinal inflammation present as an inherited abnormality in relatives of CD-patients[17]. It is still unknown whether this disturbed permeability is caused by genetic or environmental factors, but several studies provide support for a genetic rather than environmental induced increase[18,19].

The barrier of epithelial cells, with their apical TJ-structure, is critical for the permeability properties of the intestine. The TJ-structure is a multicomponent protein complex that serves to seal and regulate permeability across the paracellular space between adjacent epithelial cells, with the family of membrane-spanning claudin-proteins as the major determinants[20,21]. Claudin-1 and claudin-4 have been associated with a tight TJ-structure whereas claudin-2 expression results in a more leaky epithelial layer[22-24]. Expressions of claudins, and other TJ-proteins, are subject to regulation by different cytokines[20]. Claudin-4 seems to be preferentially expressed in M-cells[25] and the dome area of the follicle-associated epithelium[26], which has been suggested to be the site of initial inflammation in ileal CD[27].

Our aim was to elucidate a possible genetic influence of tight junction-components to IBD-susceptibility and therefore we conducted genetic association studies using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers of the genetic regions of claudin 1 (CLDN1, chromosome 3q28-q29), claudin 2 (CLDN2, chromosome Xq22.3-q23) and claudin 4 (CLDN4, chromosome 7q11.23). Furthermore, in order to identify putative functional sequence variants of CLDN2, the promoter region, exon-intron boundaries and exons harbouring the 5’ untranslated region and protein coding region were amplified and resequenced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects

The IBD-families in this study originated from the large European collaboration that lead to the discovery of NOD2/CARD15 as a CD susceptibility gene[5,28]. Swedish IBD-patients were selected for inclusion in a case-control study, whereas the remaining non-Swedish families were used in a family based genetic association study (Table 1). Samples from an anonymized regional DNA bank consisting of randomly selected individuals (n = 800) living in the southeastern part of Sweden were used as controls in the case-control studies. The study was conducted under approval by the ethics committees of Linköping University (DNR 97271) and Karolinska Institutet (DNR 97-327).

Table 1.

General study outline

Study design1 Cohort and disease Number of families Number of individuals Women
Case control study Healthy unrelated controls 333 162
Swedish IBD families 191
IBD 347 157
CD 150 69
UC 166 71
IBD-U 31 17
Family based approach Non-Swedish families 463
IBD 715 398
CD 528 297
UC 151 83
IBD-U 36 18
1

Including Claudin (CLDN)1, CLDN2, CLDN4. IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: Ulcerative colitis; IBD-U: Unclassified colitis.

SNP selection for genetic association studies

Linkage blocks were defined using SNP data from the HapMap CEPH collection and the SNPbrowser software version 3.5 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) and a default value of 0.3 linkage disequilibrium units (LDU)[29]. SNP markers were selected for CLDN1, CLDN2 and CLDN4 (Table 2). A distance less than 1 LDU has been considered useful for allelic association[30]. SNP markers were also chosen from adjacent linkage blocks.

Table 2.

Single nucleotide polymorphism markers in the genetic regions of Claudin-1, Claudin-2 and Claudin-4

Candidate gene SNP rs number1 MAF2 Assay ID3 Position in kbp relative candidate gene and location4 Coverage5
CLDN1 rs1491991 0.25 C_7550365_10  -66.3 (5’-flanking region) CLDN16
rs3732923 0.41 C_27509271_10 5.5 (intron 1) CLDN1 (from promoter until first two thirds of intron 1)
rs3732924 0.29 C_8528578_10 5.6 (intron 1) CLDN1 (from promoter until first two thirds of intron 1)
rs9848283 0.49 C_2057729_10 6.4 (intron 1) CLDN1 (from promoter until first two thirds of intron 1)
rs12629166 0.47 C_2057718_10 13.8 (intron 3) CLDN1 (from second intron until 3’-flanking region)
rs7620166 0.41 C_8528273_10 45.9 (3’-flanking region) CLDN1 (from second intron until 3’-flanking region)
rs567408 0.42 C_1587588_10 94.5 (3’-flanking region) intergenic block
rs536435 0.42 C_1587674_10 155.3 (3’-flanking region) LOC391603
CLDN2 rs4409525 0.34 C_382795_10 -23.3 (5’-flanking region) RIPPLY1, TBC1D8B
rs5917027 0.48 C_11771710_10 -1.0 (5’-flanking region) CLDN2, MORC4
rs12014762 0.21 C_2013132_20 20.0 (3’-flanking region) CLDN2, MORC4
CLDN4 rs4131376 0.43 C_26657639_10 -56.9 (5’-flanking region) ABHD11, CLDN3, CLDN4, WBSCR27, WBSCR28
rs8629 0.18 C_7493975_10 0.3 (exon 1) ABHD11, CLDN3, CLDN4, WBSCR27, WBSCR28
1

Initially all of the selected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were evaluated, using the Hapolview software 4.0[52], for linkage disequilibrium (LD) and association to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a case-control study using a subset of Swedish IBD patients (73, 39 and 42 individuals with IBD, Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis, respectively). Because of significant associations to CD, SNP markers for claudin (CLDN)1 (rs7620166) and CLDN2 (rs12014762) were chosen for further evaluation on the complete case-control. Even though non of the CLDN4 SNP markers showed evidence of association to any of the disease categories rs8629 was included for further evaluation;

2

Minor allele frequency (MAF) according to SNP data from the HapMap CEPH collection;

3

TaqMan SNP genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States);

4

With respect to each candidate gene, SNP positions are defined relative a genomic reference sequence. The first nucleotide of a reference cDNA sequence has been designated +1, with the preceeding genomic position being -1. The following reference sequences have been used for CLDN1 NT_005612.15 (genomic) and NM_021101.3 (mRNA), CLDN2 NT_011651.16 (genomic) and NM_020384.2 (mRNA) and CLDN4 NT_007758.11 (genomic) and NM_001305.3 (mRNA);

5

Linkage blocks have been defined using SNP data from the HapMap CEPH collection and the SNP browser software with 0.3 LDU (linkage disequilibrium units) as threshold for linkage block computation.

Genotyping

Allele discrimination was carried out using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays (Table 2) and TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix or TaqMan Fast Universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Master Mix without AmpErase UNG (Applied Biosystems), using either a 7300 Real-Time PCR System or a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). All genotype data were analyzed using the 7500 Fast System SDS Software version 1.3.1.21 (Applied Biosystems).

In addition, a nonsynonymous coding SNP in MORC4 (rs6622126; Applied Biosystems assay ID C_22273025_10) and two novel CLDN2 SNP markers (this study; rs62605981 and rs72466477) were genotyped. The two novel CLDN2 sequence variants were ordered as custom assays from Applied Biosystems. Primer and probe sequences are available from the authors upon request.

Resequencing of CLDN2

The promoter region, exon-intron boundaries and exons harbouring the 5’ untranslated region and protein coding region of CLDN2 were amplified by PCR and resequenced (Table 3). PCR amplifications were in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, using HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 2.0 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.2 μmol/L per PCR primer (Operon Biotechnologies GmbH, Cologne, Germany, and Scandinavian Gene Synthesis AB, Köping, Sweden). The following PCR cycle was repeated 45 times: 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. A total of 93 individuals (21 CD, 21 UC, 5 IBD-U, and 46 healthy; 60 females) were resequenced.

Table 3.

Primers for polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of Claudin-2

Candidate gene Exon Forward primer1 Reverse primer2 Size of PCR-product
CLDN2 1 GTAGGACCTGCTCTTTGAACTC23 TGAATTTAAAAGGCAGCAACTA23 708 bp
1 TCAATCTTTCCCAGCCTCCA3 TTTCTGTCAAAAACTCCACTCC3
2 TTGTAGAGAATGGGGAGGTGTGC23 TCAATTGCAGACTGAGGCCAAA2 599 bp
2 TGCAGACTGAGGCCAAACTG3
2 CTAGGCCCCTGGAGATTCAAGA23 TGTGCCCAAAAGCCCCAGAA23 682 bp
2 TTCCTTTCTCATGTGTTATTTCTAA3 GAGAAAGGAAAAAAAAAACAAC3
2 TGAGGGATTAGAGGTGTTCAA23 GCAGCACCTTCTGACACGA23 892 bp
2 ATCCTACGGGACTTCTACTCA3 ACTCCACCTGCTACCGCCACT3
1

q, Q-solution for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplification;

2

Primer used for PCR;

3

Primer used for sequencing. CLDN: Claudin.

All PCR products were purified in accordance with the QIAquick PCR purification kit protocol (Qiagen), and analyzed using the DNA 1000 assay on the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Cycle sequencing was carried out using the CEQ8800 system and accompanying sequencing reagents from Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, CA, United States) and conducted using half concentrated CEQ DTCS quick start kit, purification with an ethanol-precipitation protocol. Sequence data were analyzed with the heterozygote detection option activated in the software (version 8.0.52) and relative a reference sequence. New sequence variants were deposited in the NCBI SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/) and provided with rs-numbers.

Prediction of transcription factor binding sites

Transcription factor binding sites were predicted using the Alibaba 2.1 software[31] available through Biobase (www.gene-regulation.com), in conjunction with the Transfac database public release version 7.0[32] at Biobase.

Statistical analysis

Allelic OR with accompanying 95%CI, and P values based on χ2 statistics were calculated using a likelihood-based analysis for genetic association with the Unphased software version 3.0.13[33], both in the case-control approach and in the family-based study. In order to avoid bias due to genetic relatedness in the case-control study, one case per family was randomly selected from 191 Swedish IBD families. These random samplings of cases were repeated 15 times and the median OR was used as a representative measure of association. The case-control studies with respect to IBD, CD and UC were based on 191, 103 and 102 cases of IBD, CD, and UC, respectively, and 333 controls. No deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were observed.

Since CLDN2-MORC4 are located in a non-pseudoautosomal region of the X-chromosome, males contribute one allele and females two alleles. Because the analysis did not identify sex as a confounder, males and females were analyzed jointly. Association to clinical features was tested for using a chi-square test for qualitative variables and one way ANOVA for quantitative variables, and carried out using the GraphPad Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States). For all statistical tests, two-sided P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Correction for multiple testing was not performed.

RESULTS

Genetic association - case-control approach

Based on a subset of Swedish IBD patients (73, 39 and 42 individuals with IBD, CD or UC, respectively) one marker per gene was selected for analysis in the full study material (Table 2). Allelic association between any of the three markers for the genetic regions of CLDN1, CLDN2 or CLDN4 and patients with IBD, CD or UC were investigated using a case-control study approach (Table 4). Significant associations were observed between the CLDN2 marker (rs12014762; associated C allele frequency of 0.776 among controls) and CD (P = 0.007), and the CLDN1 marker (rs7620166; associated T allele frequency of 0.470 among controls) and IBD (P = 0.025). No associations were observed for the CLDN4 marker (rs8629; C allele frequency of 0.772 among controls), neither to IBD, CD nor UC.

Table 4.

Inflammatory bowel disease-phenotypes were investigated by performing family-based and case-control approach in genetic association studies

rs7620166 (CLDN1)
rs12014762 (CLDN2)
rs8629 (CLDN4)
allelic OR (95%CI) P value allelic OR (95%CI) P value allelic OR (95%CI) P value
IBD Swedish case-control 1.33 (1.04-1.72) 0.025 1.39 (0.95-2.01) 0.083 1.21 (0.89-1.65) 0.225
Non-Swedish families 0.87 (0.72-1.06) 0.177 1.25 (0.89-1.77) 0.195 1.09 (0.88-1.33) 0.432
CD Swedish case-control 1.17 (0.86-1.60) 0.319 1.98 (1.17-3.35) 0.007 1.25 (0.84-1.85) 0.258
Non-Swedish families 0.80 (0.64-1.00) 0.052 1.37 (0.91-2.07) 0.126 1.14 (0.89-1.46) 0.287
UC Swedish case-control 1.35 (0.98-1.84) 0.064 1.27 (0.80-2.02) 0.304 1.18 (0.80-1.73) 0.409
Non-Swedish families 1.19 (0.77-1.84) 0.436 0.91 (0.39-2.14) 0.827 1.15 (0.75-1.77) 0.512

The family-based association studies included a total of 463 families. For the single nucleotide polymorphism -markers rs7620166 [claudin (CLDN)1], rs12014762 (CLDN2) and rs8629 (CLDN4) genotyping failed for 5 [including 2 Crohn’s disease (CD)], 9 (including 3 CD) and 7 (including 2 CD) samples, respectively. Results were based on 191, 103 and 102 cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), CD and ulcerative colitis (UC), respectively and 333 controls. OR (and its associated 95%CI) and P values (based on log likelihood ratio χ2 statistics) were calculated for the T allele of rs7620166, the C allele of rs12014762, and the C allele of rs8629.

Genetic association - family-based approach

The same three SNP markers were further investigated using a family-based approach in non-Swedish families (Table 4). The significant associations identified in the case-control study were not confirmed (P = 0.126 and P = 0.177 for the CLDN2 and CLDN1 marker, respectively). The CLDN2 marker rs12014762 was not related to any demographic or disease characteristics in CD-patients (Table 5).

Table 5.

Genotype-phenotype correlation between Claudin-2 marker (rs12014762) polymorphism and clinical characteristics of 677 patients with Crohn’s disease (all families)

rs12014762 Crohn’s disease At least one C T P value
Sex
Male 265 47
Female 354 11
Age at diagnosis (yr)
Mean (SD) 24.48 (12.11) 24.36 (11.46) 0.90
Median (range) 22 (3-70) 22 (8-63)
Location at onset: n = 583 n = 54
Pure colonic disease 78 6 0.64
Pure ileal disease 117 14 0.31
Ileocolonic disease 274 309 0.87
Any colonic disease 414 37 0.70
Any ileal disease 424 42 0.42
Upper digestive tract 118 12 0.73
Perineal disease 147 11 0.53
Granuloma 237/478 26/43 0.12
Penetrating disease 218/478 22/43 0.48
Strictures 221/478 15/43 0.15
Extra-digestive symptoms 190/619 15/58 0.44
Smoking habits n = 505 n = 51
Non-smoker 272 21 0.08
Smoker 157 21 0.14
Ex-smoker 76 9 0.62

Resequencing of CLDN2

Based on the most significant association (CD and the CLDN2 marker), CLDN2 was chosen for resequencing in an approach to identify novel sequence variants of putative importance for the risk of developing CD. Two novel non-coding sequence variants were identified for CLDN2 (Table 6).

Table 6.

Sequence variants identified by resequencing of selected gene regions

Gene1 Position of SNP rs-number Part of gene/predicted consequence VAF/control2 VAF/patients2
CLDN2 c.-178-678C>G (g.29466911) rs62605981 Intron/5’ gene flanking region3 0.175 0.139
c.-178-104_-103delAT (g.29467485_29467486delAT) rs72466477 Intron/5’ gene flanking region3 0.175 0.083
1

The following reference sequences have been used for claudin (CLDN)2 NT_011651.16 (genomic) and NM_020384.2 (mRNA);

2

Variant allele frequencies (VAF) are defined with respect to the corresponding reference sequence;

3

The intronic region of CLDN2, according to the CLDN2 reference mRNA (NM_020384), correspond to the promoter region described by Sakaguchi et al[34]. SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism.

Prediction of transcription factor binding sites in the CLDN2 promoter and analysis of genetic association to the newly identified sequence variants

The two novel CLDN2 polymorphisms were located in a region corresponding to the CLDN2 promoter, as described by Sakaguchi et al[34] Analyzing the promoter region of CLDN2 for the presence of possible transcription factor binding sites, revealed that these new variants were located in a putative specificity protein 1 (Sp1) binding site/GC-box (rs62605981) and a putative upstream stimulatory factor (USF) binding site/E-box (rs72466477). The genotyping results of these two novel SNPs were based on 166, 89 and 89 cases of IBD, CD and UC, respectively, from the Swedish families and their 333 non-related controls (Table 1). Neither rs62605981 (C allele frequency of 0.860 among controls) nor rs72466477 (AT allele frequency of 0.842 among controls) showed any significant associations to IBD overall or to any sub-entities (Table 7).

Table 7.

Genetic association between inflammatory bowel disease-phenotype and either newly discovered Claudin-2 promoter polymorphisms or a nonsynonymous coding polymorphisms in MORC4 was analyzed by performing case-control studies

rs62605981 (CLDN2)
rs72466477 (CLDN2)
rs6622126 (MORC4)
allelic OR (95%CI) P value allelic OR (95%CI) P value allelic OR(95%CI) P value
IBD 1.11 (0.71-1.73) 0.659 1.23 (0.79-1.91) 0.350 1.24 (0.91-1.70) 0.179
CD 0.83 (0.49-1.41) 0.501 1.16 (0.68-2.00) 0.584 1.61 (1.08-2.41) 0.018
UC 1.24 (0.69-2.26) 0.463 1.19 (0.68-2.06) 0.543 0.903 (0.61-1.33) 0.606

Results were based on 166, 89 and 89 cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC), respectively, available from the Swedish families and 333 controls (Table 1). OR (and its associated 95%CI) and P values (based on log likelihood ratio chi-square statistics) were calculated for the C allele of rs62605981, the AT allele of rs72466477, and the G allele of rs6622126. CLDN: Claudin.

MORC4 and genetic association

In addition to CLDN2, MORC4 is located on the same linkage block as the CD associated marker (rs12014762). A nonsynonymous coding SNP (rs6622126) was identified in the MORC4 gene using the NCBI SNP database, for which a high minor allele frequency (A allele = 0.440) was present in the non-related Swedish control samples. This SNP was investigated for genetic association to IBD overall and to sub-entities, using the same individuals as used for the two novel CLDN2 variants. A significant association was observed between the G allele (frequency of 0.560 among controls) and CD (P = 0.018), but not to UC or IBD (Table 7).

DISCUSSION

TJ proteins are considered key components in the regulation of paracellular permeability of both epithelial and endothelial cell linings[20,21], and due to their barrier-forming properties we considered claudin genes as candidate genes affecting a leaky gut phenotype of IBD.

Using the case-control approach, an association was identified between the CLDN2-MORC4 region (rs12014762) and the occurrence of CD. This SNP marker was associated with an overall increased risk of having CD, but not to any distinctive phenotypic pattern. This association was not confirmed in the family-based approach, where non-Swedish families were included. Such a regional heterogeneity may in part be explained by different genetic backgrounds. Substantial genetic heterogeneity due to geographic stratification has been demonstrated in genome-wide association studies[6]. A geographically homogenous population (this study) should be advantageous for unveiling regionally restricted genetic risk factors. The case of underrepresented NOD2 mutations in CD patients from the Nordic countries[35-37] together with our data on the presence of CLDN2 variants in Swedish patients add support for such an assumption taking into account that IBD, and especially CD, are polygenic disorders[2,3]. When we investigated a possible interaction between NOD2 and the CLDN2-MORC4 region (rs12014762) with individuals stratified on the basis of carrying none or at least one NOD2 mutant allele, no significant association was identified between these two genetic regions (data not shown).

Both CD and UC have been associated with an increase in intestinal permeability[9-11]. Experimental data reveal an altered expression of claudin-2, and other claudin proteins, in the intestinal epithelium of IBD patients, and such alterations affect the permeability characteristics[38]. Claudin-2 expression was increased in a cell culture of human colonic epithelial cells (HT-29/B6) in response to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)[38], a finding consistent with an increased expression of claudin-2 in the inflamed epithelium of CD patients[38,39]. Using another human colonic epithelial cell line (T84), Prasad et al[39] demonstrated an increase both in paracellular permeability and claudin-2 expression in response to interleukin-13, but not in response to interferon-γ/TNF-α treatment.

Within the resequenced parts of CLDN2 we identified two novel polymorphisms in the promoter region. These two sequence variants were located in different putative transcription factor binding sites, a Sp1 binding site/GC-box (rs62605981) and an USF binding site/E-box (rs72466477). It has been shown that the CLDN2 transcription is affected by several transcription factors[34], and both E-box binding[40-42] and Sp1 binding site[43,44] transcription factors have been identified as important determinants of claudin gene expression. However, neither of the two novel promoter variants were associated to CD.

MORC4 is present on the same linkage block as CLDN2 and the CD associated marker (rs12014762). It is therefore possible that the C allele of rs12014762 is a marker for a functional variant of MORC4 that results in an increased overall risk of developing CD. A significant association was observed between CD and the G allele of the nonsynonymous coding SNP in the MORC4 gene (rs6622126), resulting in a substitution of the more hydrophobic amino acid isoleucine at position 473, located immediately outside the region predicted to be a zinc finger (420-472), with threonine.

MORC4 encodes a member of the MORC family of CW-type zinc finger proteins, which contain a number of predicted domains and motifs suggestive of being transcription factors[45]. MORC4 exhibits a low-level mRNA expression in a variety of normal tissues, including the intestine. Using the SKI-like protein as bait in a two-hybrid screen, MORC4 has been identified as a putative interacting protein, linking MORC4 to the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway and the SMAD family of signal transduction proteins[46]. Increased intestinal expression of TGF-β has been observed in patients with CD[47] and, in monolayers of intestinal epithelial cells, TGF-β has been shown to preserve or enhance the paracellular barrier[48,49]. These two findings seem to contradict the increased intestinal permeability that has been associated to both CD and UC[9-11]. Possibly a genetic variant in the CLDN2-MORC4 region could disturb a TGF-β mediated signal that preserves or enhances the paracellular barrier, or exert an effect on CLDN2 expression that dominates a TGF-β mediated effect on paracellular permeability. In addition, a SMAD4-dependent, but TGF-β-independent, repression of CLDN1 transcription[50] and a ZEB2-mediated repression of CLDN4[42] support a role for the SMAD signal transduction pathway in the regulation of claudin genes.

An increased intestinal permeability has been associated with the CD susceptibility allele CARD15 3020insC[18], and TJ associated genes have been suggested as susceptibility genes for UC (e.g., GNA12[2]) and for both UC and CD (MAGI2[51]).

In conclusion, our findings add further support for a genetically impaired intestinal epithelial barrier as one predisposing factor in the etiology of CD, either directly through CLDN2 or indirect via a tentative link between MORC4, TGF-β/SMAD signalling and an effect on paracellular permeability. This putative genetic link between the CLDN2-MORC4 region, intestinal epithelial integrity and the risk of developing CD needs to be further explored.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Laboratory technician Lena Svensson is gratefully acknowledged for excellent technical assistance with genotyping.

COMMENTS

Background

For chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis - a number of studies have demonstrated a substantial genetic predisposition. These inflammatory conditions have been associated with an increased intestinal permeability. Consistent with the phenotype of these diseases, several genetic association studies have implicated mainly components of the immune response, but also factors implicated in intestinal permeability. In order to further investigate intestinal permeability as a predisposing genetic risk factor for IBD, the authors have conducted genetic association studies on claudin genes (CLDN1, CLDN2 and CLDN4), key components in the regulation of permeability.

Research frontiers

Although large-scale genome-wide association studies have uncovered a large number of genetic susceptibility loci in relation to IBD these factors still explain only a minority of the total genetic risk for IBD. The genetic background regulating intestinal barrier functions largely remains unknown.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The barrier of epithelial cells is critical for the permeability properties of the intestine. The tight junction structure is a multicomponent protein complex that serves to seal and regulate permeability across the space between adjacent epithelial cells, with significant contribution from members of the claudin family. This is the first study to report genetic link between claudin gene (CLDN2) and the risk of developing CD.

Applications

In this study the authors have identified a genetic link between the CLDN2-MORC4 region and the risk of developing CD, and thereby highlighted claudins as therapeutic targets.

Terminology

The tight junction structure is critical for the permeability properties of the intestine. The structure is a multicomponent protein complex that serves to seal and regulate permeability across the paracellular space between adjacent epithelial cells.

Peer review

This is a small study on the importance of claudins (CLDN1, CLDN2 and CLDN4) in Swedish and non-Swedish case-control and family-based approach. A weak suggestive association was reported in the case-control setting, while this was not replicated in the non-Swedish sample. The paper is interesting and well written: its main limitation lies in the study design, comparing Swedish and non-Swedish individuals using two different approaches.

Footnotes

Supported by Grants from Futurum - the academy of healthcare, County council of Jönköping; the Swedish Society of Medicine; the Research Council of South-East Sweden (FORSS) and the County Council of Östergötland (ALF-Grants)

P- Reviewers Deaglio S, Lakatos PL, TanakaT S- Editor Zhai HH L- Editor A E- Editor Ma S

References

  • 1.Yang H, Taylor K D. Rotter J I. Inflammatory bowel disease. In: King RA, Rotter JI, Motulsky AG, Editors , editors. The genetic basis of common diseases, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP; 2002. pp. 266–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson CA, Boucher G, Lees CW, Franke A, D’Amato M, Taylor KD, Lee JC, Goyette P, Imielinski M, Latiano A, et al. Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47. Nat Genet. 2011;43:246–252. doi: 10.1038/ng.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Franke A, McGovern DP, Barrett JC, Wang K, Radford-Smith GL, Ahmad T, Lees CW, Balschun T, Lee J, Roberts R, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1118–1125. doi: 10.1038/ng.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hampe J, Franke A, Rosenstiel P, Till A, Teuber M, Huse K, Albrecht M, Mayr G, De La Vega FM, Briggs J, et al. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet. 2007;39:207–211. doi: 10.1038/ng1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cézard JP, Belaiche J, Almer S, Tysk C, O’Morain CA, Gassull M, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature. 2001;411:599–603. doi: 10.1038/35079107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY, Lee JC, Schumm LP, Sharma Y, Anderson CA, et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491:119–124. doi: 10.1038/nature11582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Momozawa Y, Mni M, Nakamura K, Coppieters W, Almer S, Amininejad L, Cleynen I, Colombel JF, de Rijk P, Dewit O, et al. Resequencing of positional candidates identifies low frequency IL23R coding variants protecting against inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43:43–47. doi: 10.1038/ng.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rioux JD, Xavier RJ, Taylor KD, Silverberg MS, Goyette P, Huett A, Green T, Kuballa P, Barmada MM, Datta LW, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nat Genet. 2007;39:596–604. doi: 10.1038/ng2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Almer S, Franzén L, Olaison G, Smedh K, Ström M. Increased absorption of polyethylene glycol 600 deposited in the colon in active ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1993;34:509–513. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bjarnason I. Intestinal permeability. Gut. 1994;35:S18–S22. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clayburgh DR, Shen L, Turner JR. A porous defense: the leaky epithelial barrier in intestinal disease. Lab Invest. 2004;84:282–291. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hollander D. Permeability in Crohn’s disease: altered barrier functions in healthy relatives. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1848–1851. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90668-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munkholm P, Langholz E, Hollander D, Thornberg K, Orholm M, Katz KD, Binder V. Intestinal permeability in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis and their first degree relatives. Gut. 1994;35:68–72. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Söderholm JD, Olaison G, Lindberg E, Hannestad U, Vindels A, Tysk C, Järnerot G, Sjödahl R. Different intestinal permeability patterns in relatives and spouses of patients with Crohn’s disease: an inherited defect in mucosal defence. Gut. 1999;44:96–100. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Teahon K, Smethurst P, Levi AJ, Menzies IS, Bjarnason I. Intestinal permeability in patients with Crohn’s disease and their first degree relatives. Gut. 1992;33:320–323. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.3.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.May GR, Sutherland LR, Meddings JB. Is small intestinal permeability really increased in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1627–1632. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90638-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thjodleifsson B, Sigthorsson G, Cariglia N, Reynisdottir I, Gudbjartsson DF, Kristjansson K, Meddings JB, Gudnason V, Wandall JH, Andersen LP, et al. Subclinical intestinal inflammation: an inherited abnormality in Crohn’s disease relatives. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1728–1737. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00383-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buhner S, Buning C, Genschel J, Kling K, Herrmann D, Dignass A, Kuechler I, Krueger S, Schmidt HH, Lochs H. Genetic basis for increased intestinal permeability in families with Crohn’s disease: role of CARD15 3020insC mutation. Gut. 2006;55:342–347. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.065557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Büning C, Geissler N, Prager M, Sturm A, Baumgart DC, Büttner J, Bühner S, Haas V, Lochs H. Increased small intestinal permeability in ulcerative colitis: rather genetic than environmental and a risk factor for extensive disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1932–1939. doi: 10.1002/ibd.22909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Förster C. Tight junctions and the modulation of barrier function in disease. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130:55–70. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0424-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Furuse M. Molecular basis of the core structure of tight junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a002907. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Furuse M, Furuse K, Sasaki H, Tsukita S. Conversion of zonulae occludentes from tight to leaky strand type by introducing claudin-2 into Madin-Darby canine kidney I cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:263–272. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Inai T, Kobayashi J, Shibata Y. Claudin-1 contributes to the epithelial barrier function in MDCK cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 1999;78:849–855. doi: 10.1016/S0171-9335(99)80086-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Itallie CM, Fanning AS, Anderson JM. Reversal of charge selectivity in cation or anion-selective epithelial lines by expression of different claudins. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;285:F1078–F1084. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00116.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lo D, Tynan W, Dickerson J, Scharf M, Cooper J, Byrne D, Brayden D, Higgins L, Evans C, O’Mahony DJ. Cell culture modeling of specialized tissue: identification of genes expressed specifically by follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patch by expression profiling of Caco-2/Raji co-cultures. Int Immunol. 2004;16:91–99. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tamagawa H, Takahashi I, Furuse M, Yoshitake-Kitano Y, Tsukita S, Ito T, Matsuda H, Kiyono H. Characteristics of claudin expression in follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches: preferential localization of claudin-4 at the apex of the dome region. Lab Invest. 2003;83:1045–1053. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000078741.55670.6e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gullberg E, Söderholm JD. Peyer’s patches and M cells as potential sites of the inflammatory onset in Crohn’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1072:218–232. doi: 10.1196/annals.1326.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lesage S, Zouali H, Cézard JP, Colombel JF, Belaiche J, Almer S, Tysk C, O’Morain C, Gassull M, Binder V, et al. CARD15/NOD2 mutational analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation in 612 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:845–857. doi: 10.1086/339432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De La Vega FM, Isaac HI, Scafe CR. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2006:487–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maniatis N, Collins A, Xu CF, McCarthy LC, Hewett DR, Tapper W, Ennis S, Ke X, Morton NE. The first linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps: delineation of hot and cold blocks by diplotype analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:2228–2233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042680999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grabe N. AliBaba2: context specific identification of transcription factor binding sites. In Silico Biol. 2002;2:S1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, Barre-Dirrie A, Reuter I, Chekmenev D, Krull M, Hornischer K, et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D108–D110. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dudbridge F. Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear families and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data. Hum Hered. 2008;66:87–98. doi: 10.1159/000119108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakaguchi T, Gu X, Golden HM, Suh E, Rhoads DB, Reinecker HC. Cloning of the human claudin-2 5’-flanking region revealed a TATA-less promoter with conserved binding sites in mouse and human for caudal-related homeodomain proteins and hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:21361–21370. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110261200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vind I, Vieira A, Hougs L, Tavares L, Riis L, Andersen PS, Locht H, Freitas J, Monteiro E, Christensen IJ, et al. NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms in Crohn’s disease: a genotype-phenotype analysis in Danish and Portuguese patients and controls. Digestion. 2005;72:156–163. doi: 10.1159/000088371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Törkvist L, Noble CL, Lördal M, Sjöqvist U, Lindforss U, Nimmo ER, Russell RK, Löfberg R, Satsangi J. Contribution of CARD15 variants in determining susceptibility to Crohn’s disease in Sweden. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:700–705. doi: 10.1080/00365520500395245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Törkvist L, Halfvarson J, Ong RT, Lördal M, Sjöqvist U, Bresso F, Björk J, Befrits R, Löfberg R, Blom J, et al. Analysis of 39 Crohn’s disease risk loci in Swedish inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:907–909. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zeissig S, Bürgel N, Günzel D, Richter J, Mankertz J, Wahnschaffe U, Kroesen AJ, Zeitz M, Fromm M, Schulzke JD. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2007;56:61–72. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.094375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prasad S, Mingrino R, Kaukinen K, Hayes KL, Powell RM, MacDonald TT, Collins JE. Inflammatory processes have differential effects on claudins 2, 3 and 4 in colonic epithelial cells. Lab Invest. 2005;85:1139–1162. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ikenouchi J, Matsuda M, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Regulation of tight junctions during the epithelium-mesenchyme transition: direct repression of the gene expression of claudins/occludin by Snail. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1959–1967. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martínez-Estrada OM, Cullerés A, Soriano FX, Peinado H, Bolós V, Martínez FO, Reina M, Cano A, Fabre M, Vilaró S. The transcription factors Slug and Snail act as repressors of Claudin-1 expression in epithelial cells. Biochem J. 2006;394:449–457. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vandewalle C, Comijn J, De Craene B, Vermassen P, Bruyneel E, Andersen H, Tulchinsky E, Van Roy F, Berx G. SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6566–6578. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dufresne J, Cyr DG. Activation of an SP binding site is crucial for the expression of claudin 1 in rat epididymal principal cells. Biol Reprod. 2007;76:825–832. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.057430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Honda H, Pazin MJ, Ji H, Wernyj RP, Morin PJ. Crucial roles of Sp1 and epigenetic modifications in the regulation of the CLDN4 promoter in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21433–21444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603767200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liggins AP, Cooper CD, Lawrie CH, Brown PJ, Collins GP, Hatton CS, Pulford K, Banham AH. MORC4, a novel member of the MORC family, is highly expressed in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:479–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06680.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Colland F, Jacq X, Trouplin V, Mougin C, Groizeleau C, Hamburger A, Meil A, Wojcik J, Legrain P, Gauthier JM. Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. Genome Res. 2004;14:1324–1332. doi: 10.1101/gr.2334104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Burke JP, Mulsow JJ, O’Keane C, Docherty NG, Watson RW, O’Connell PR. Fibrogenesis in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:439–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Howe KL, Reardon C, Wang A, Nazli A, McKay DM. Transforming growth factor-beta regulation of epithelial tight junction proteins enhances barrier function and blocks enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7-induced increased permeability. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:1587–1597. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61243-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Planchon S, Fiocchi C, Takafuji V, Roche JK. Transforming growth factor-beta1 preserves epithelial barrier function: identification of receptors, biochemical intermediates, and cytokine antagonists. J Cell Physiol. 1999;181:55–66. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199910)181:1<55::AID-JCP6>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shiou SR, Singh AB, Moorthy K, Datta PK, Washington MK, Beauchamp RD, Dhawan P. Smad4 regulates claudin-1 expression in a transforming growth factor-beta-independent manner in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1571–1579. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McGovern DP, Taylor KD, Landers C, Derkowski C, Dutridge D, Dubinsky M, Ippoliti A, Vasiliauskas E, Mei L, Mengesha E, et al. MAGI2 genetic variation and inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:75–83. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES