Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2010 Jun 30;38(2):113–117. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.2.113

Biological Control of Alternaria Fruit Rot of Chili by Trichoderma Species under Field Conditions

Most Ferdousi Begum 1,✉, M A Rahman 1, M Firoz Alam 1
PMCID: PMC3741560  PMID: 23956637

Abstract

Trichoderma strains were evaluated under field conditions to assay their efficacy in suppressing Alternaria fruit rot disease and promoting chili plant growth. The experiment was conducted at the Botanical Garden, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh from July 2006 to March 2007. Application of Trichoderma harzianum IMI 392432 significantly (p = 0.05) suppressed the disease compared to Alternaria tenuis (T2) treatment and improved both growth and yield. The treatment T4 (T. harzianum IMI-392432 + A. tenuis) was most effective in reducing disease percentage (72.27%) compared to A. tenuis (T1) treatment. The highest seed germination rate (85.56%) and the highest growth and yield (12.5 g/plant) was also recorded in the same treatment (T4), followed by T5 (T. harzianum IMI-392433 000000 + A. tenuis), T6 (T. harzianum IMI-392434 +A. tenuis), T2 (T. virens IMI-392430 + A. tenuis), and T3 (T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 +A. tenuis) treatment, while single treatment with A. tenuis significantly decreased these values.

Keywords: Alternaria-fruit rot, Biological control, Chili, Trichoderma, Vigor index, Yield components

Chili (Capsicum annum L.) is an important spice in Bangladesh, in 2000~2001, the total area under chili cultivation was recorded as 166 ha, with a total production of 141 metric tons [1]. Alternaria fruit rot is seed-borne, widespread and highly destructive disease that infects chili plants, and yield loss caused by these diseases has been recorded up to 100 percent under congenial environment conditions [2]. Biological control represents a natural and ecological approach to disease control that reduces chemical input and their effects [3]. The fungi Trichoderma has been an exceptionally good model to study biocontrol because it is ubiquitous, easy to isolate and culture, grows rapidly on many substrates, affects a wide range of plant pathogens, is rarely pathogenic on higher plants, acts as a mycoparasite, competes well for food and growth sites, produces antibiotics and has an enzyme system capable of attacking a wide range of plant pathogens [4]. Furthermore, Trichoderma inhibit or degrade pectinases and other enzymes that are essential for plant-pathogenic fungi, such as Botrytis cinerea, to penetrate leaf surfaces [5].

Although some chemicals are known to control Alternaria tenuis, they are not always effective. Furthermore, because chili is a vegetable crop, using chemicals for disease control is nonideal in view of the residue problems. Biocontrol of plant pathogens using antagonistic fungi and bacteria, therefore, assumes more significance. Among antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma harzianum has shown promise as a biocontrol agent [6]. Although Trichoderma species are probably the most widely used fungi in biological control of plant pathogens, no in vivo experiment has been conducted to test whether it can control Alternaria fruit rot of chili. Therefore, the objectives of this investigation were to assay the effects of Trichoderma strains against fruit rot pathogen A. tenuis. Plant growth, yield components and disease percentage were recorded to evaluate their performance under field conditions.

Materials and Methods

To evaluate the efficacy of Trichoderma species at controlling Alternaria fruit rot disease in chili, experiments were conducted at the Botanical Garden of Rajshahi University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh from July 2006 to March 2007.

Seed collection

Local chili variety "Bogra" was collected from the Spices Research Centre, Bogra, Bangladesh. Pathogen-free healthy seeds were selected for use in this experiment.

Sources of Trichoderma

Five Trichoderma strains, including T. virens IMI-392430, T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 and T. harzianum IMI-392432, T. harzianum IMI-392433, and T. harzianum IMI-392434 were used in this study which was collected from the Biotechnology and Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh. These strains were previously verified [7] by CABI Bioscience, Surrey, UK.

Isolation of A. tenuis

A. tenuis was isolated from infected fruit parts of chili which were collected after proper recording of the symptoms of the disease. Following standard phytopathological methods [8], pathogen was isolated from the transitional zone of healthy and infected tissues on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. The pathogenicity of the A. tenuis isolate was confirmed on local chili cultivar. All the cultures were stored at 4℃ for further study.

Preparation and application of spore suspensions

Mycelial discs (5 mm diameter) of Trichoderma isolates and A. tenuis were obtained from 4~5 days old culture and separately transferred to 50 mL PDA in a 250-mL conical flask and incubated at 28℃. After incubation, 30 mL of sterile distilled water was added to each culture and the flasks were shaken at 50 rpm for 30 min in an orbital shaker. Then the content of each conical flask was filtered through sterile muslin cloth. The culture filtrate, containing the spores, was collected, and a concentration of 5 × 105 spores/mL was obtained by dilution with sterilized distilled water. For seed treatment, 10 to 15 seeds were dipped in the spore suspension (5 × 105 spores/mL) of 4~5 days old Trichoderma strains for about 20 min, and the treated seeds were dried by laminar air flow. After that, both Trichoderma treated and untreated seeds were again dipped in the spore suspension (3 × 105 spores/mL) of 7 days old culture of A. tenuis for about 20 min and then dried by laminar air flow. After germination of the treated seeds, the pot soil was treated with 30 mL of conidial suspension (combination of Trichoderma strains and A. tenuis) according to respective treatment. The treatment was continued up to harvesting with seven days interval.

Treatments

The experiments were designed with the following combinations:

  • T0 = Control (untreated soil and untreated seeds)

  • T1 = A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

  • T2 = T. virens IMI-392430 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

  • T3 = T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

  • T4 = T. harzianum IMI-392432 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

  • T5 = T. harzianum IMI-392433 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

  • T6 = T. harzianum IMI-392434 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL)

Sterilization of soil

Soil was collected from the research field of Rajshahi University and sterilized with formaldehyde (formalin : water = 1 : 5 v/v) and covered with polythene. After 30 days of sterilization, soils were put in the earth pots (30 × 20 cm). To minimize the loss of excess water, a 2 cm hole was made from the bottom of each pot.

Seed germination and vigour index

All treated seeds were sown separately in each pot with soil previously inoculated with A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL). Untreated seeds were sown in un-inoculated soil as a positive control. At least 10 seeds were sown in each pot. After 7 days of germination, seed germination percentages were recorded. Vigour index for each treatment was determined according to the following formula from Abdul-Baki and Anderson [9].

Vigour index = [Mean of root length (cm) + Mean of shoot length (cm)] × percentage of seed germination

Collection of data on yield and yield contributing characteristics

Yield and yield contributing data were collected at different stages of plant growth after sowing. Observations were recorded for plant height, leaf number, node number, primary and secondary branch numbers, number of flowers at maximum flowering, number of leaves at maximum flowering, total number of fruit, fresh fruit weight, dry fruit weight, total number of seeds, yield per plant and percentage of infected fruit.

Percentage of infected fruit

Percentage of infected fruit was recorded by the following formula:

graphic file with name mb-38-113-e001.jpg

Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experiment was carried out following Randomized Block Design with three replications. Data on growth yield and yield contributing characteristics were recorded and statistically analyzed by DMRT test with the help of the computer package program SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results and Discussion

Germination percentage and vigour index

Seed germination and the vigour index were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected by the treatments (Table 1). The highest percentage of seed germination (85.56%) and vigour index (569.67) were recorded for the seeds treated with T. harzianum IMI-392432 (T4), and the lowest was recorded for pathogen treatment alone (T1). Seed germination was drastically reduced for T1 (A. tenuis) and control. These results revealed that T. harzianum might promote chili seed germination. Trichoderma spp. have evolved numerous mechanisms like mycoparasitism, production of inhibitory substances, inactivation of pathogen enzymes and induction of resistance to attack other fungi and enhance plant and root growth [10]. Seedling vigour was found to be higher when seeds were treated with T. harzianum IMI-392432 (T4) spore suspension, whereas control (T0) and A. tenuis (T1) showed the worst seedling vigour. Consistent with these results, Mukhtar [11] observed the highest vigour index when okra seeds were treated with T. harzianum. Lo and Lin [12] screened Trichoderma strains on plant and root growth of bitter gourd, loofah and cucumber and noted that Trichoderma strains significantly increased seedling height by 26 to 61%, root exploration by 85~209%, leaf area by 27~38% and root dry weight by 38 to 62% 15 days of showing. Shake [13] observed the highest percentage of seed germination and vigour index when rice seeds were treated with T. harzianum.

Table 1.

Seed germination (%) and vigour index of chili under different treatments

graphic file with name mb-38-113-i001.jpg

Open in a new tab

Values within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by DMRT analysis.

T0 = Control, T1 = Alternaria tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T2 = Trichoderma virens IMI-392430 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T3 = T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T4 = T. harzianum IMI-392432 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T5 = T. harzianum IMI-392433 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T6 = T. harzianum IMI-392434 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL).

aValues are the means of three replications.

Growth analysis

After 30, 60, and 90 days, plant height, leaf number, node number, primary branch number, secondary branch number, and leaf and flower numbers at maximum flowering were highest for T4 (T. harzianum IMI-392432) and lowest for T1 (A. tenuis) treatment, with a significant difference (p < 0.05) (Table 2). These results indicate that T. harzianum IMI 392432 has growth-promoting effects on chili. Growth promoting effects by T. harzianum has been reported in other crops [14, 15] and by T. koningii [15], but growth promotion has not been demonstrated by T. virens on cotton [16].

Table 2.

Effect of seed treatment with Trichoderma strains on chili growth characteristics

graphic file with name mb-38-113-i002.jpg

Open in a new tab

Values within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by DMRT analysis.

T0 = Control, T1 = Alternaria tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T2 = Trichoderma virens IMI-392430 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mLl), T3 = T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T4 = T. harzianum IMI-392432 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T5 = T. harzianum IMI-392433 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T6 = T. harzianum IMI-392434 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL).

aMeans of three replications.

Yield and yield contributing characters

The highest total number of fruit, fresh fruit weight, dry fruit weight, and number of seeds per fruit, 100 seed weight and yield/plant was highest for T4 treatment and lowest for A. tenuis (T1) treatment (Table 3). T. harzianum IMI-392432 increased yield and yield contributing characteristics by 74.77% for total number of fruit, 58.33% for fresh fruit weight, 74.26% for dry fruit weight, 40.25% for number of seeds/fruit, 33.33% for 100 seed weight and 73.01% for yield/plant compared to A. tenuis (T2) treatment. The results reveal that the yield and yield contributing characteristics were significantly affected by the application of T. harzianum IMI-392432. With T. harzianum treatment of the seeds, many workers found much higher yields compared to control. Sultana [17] obtained up to 81.60% higher lentil seed yield when they were treated with T. harzianum. Sumitra and Gaikward [18] opined that T. harzianum increased shoot and root length in Trichoderma treated plots. Harman [19] reported that T. harzianum (T22), when applied as a seed treatment on potatoes, frequently increased both size and yield. da Luz et al. [20] also observed that yields of wheat seeds infected with Pyrenophora triticirepentis, were significantly increased after application of T. virens (1.66 kg/ha).

Table 3.

Effect of Trichoderma strains on chili yield and yield contributing characteristics

graphic file with name mb-38-113-i003.jpg

Open in a new tab

Values within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by DMRT analysis.

T0 = Control, T1 = Alternaria tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T2 = Trichoderma virens IMI-392430 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T3 = T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T4 = T. harzianum IMI-392432 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T5 = T. harzianum IMI-392433 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T6 = T. harzianum IMI-392434 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL).

aMeans of three replications.

Percentage of infected fruit

The highest percentage of the lowest percentages of infected fruit was recorded in T4 treatment (Fig. 1). In the control (T0), a remarkable percentage of infected fruit was also observed; in this case infection may be due to the seeds or environment. Application of T. harzianum IMI 392432 was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) suppressed the disease (72.27%) compared to the A. tenuis (T1) treatment (Fig. 2). Biswas and Das [21] reported that against seedling disease Trichoderma is superior as seed coating. Prasad et al. [22] found that soil treated with T. harzianum showed 61.5% disease control in chickpea while Kashem et al. [23] observed seed < 30% disease control in lentil.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Effect of Trichoderma strains on percentages of infected chili fruit. Bars marked by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by DMRT analysis. T0 = Control, T1 = Alternaria tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T2 = T. virens IMI-392430 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T3 = T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T4 = T. harzianum IMI-392432 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T5 = T. harzianum IMI-392433 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL), T6 = T. harzianum IMI-392434 (5 × 105 spores/mL) + A. tenuis (3 × 105 spores/mL).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Photographs show the effects of Trichoderma strains on suppressing Alternaria fruit rot of chili; T0 = infected fruit of chili in control; T1 = infected fruit of chili treated with A. tenuis; T2 = healthy fruit of chili treated with T. virens IMI-392430 + A. tenuis, T3 = infected fruit of chili treated with T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431 + A. tenuis, T4 = healthy fruit of chili treated with T. harzianum IMI-392432 + A. tenuis, T5 = healthy fruit of chili treated with T. harzianum IMI-392433 + A. tenuis, T6 = healthy fruit of chili treated with T. harzianum IMI-392434 + A. tenuis.

From the above findings it may be concluded that T. harzianum IMI-392432 is more effective at controlling Alternaria fruit rot disease in chili, and this strain also showed promising results on chili germination, growth and yield characteristics. The results suggest that this strain may be used as an effective biocontrol agent to control fruit rot disease of chili.

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly grateful to the Ministry of National Science Information and Communication Technology, Bangladesh for financial support. The authors also express their special thanks to the Spices Research Centre, Bogra, Bangladesh.

References

  • 1.Barua H, Rahman MM, Masud MM. Effect of storage containers environment at different storage period on the quality of chili seed. Int J Sustain Crop Prod. 2009;4:28–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mahal MF. Study of fruit rot disease of chili caused by Alternaria tenuis and its control in Bangladesh [dissertation] Rajshahi: University of Rajshahi; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lewis JA, Papavizas GC. Biocontrol of plant diseases: the approach for tomorrow. Crop Prot. 1991;10:95–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Islam MS, Saha AK, Mosaddeque HQ, Amin MR, Islam MM. In vitro studies on the reaction on fungi Trichoderma to different herbicides used in tea plantation. Int J Sustain Crop Prod. 2008;3:27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zimand G, Eland Y, Chet I. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on Botrytis cinerea pathogenicity. Phytopathology. 1996;86:1255–1260. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bunker RN, Mathur K. Antagonism of local biocontrol agents to Rhizoctonia solani inciting dry root of chili. J Mycol Plant Pothol. 2001;31:50–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rahman MA. Screening of Trichoderma spp. and their efficacy as a bioconversion agent of municipal solid waste through appropriate technique of solid state fermentation [dissertation] Rajshahi: University of Rajshahi; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Booth C. The genus Fusarium. Surrey: Commonwealth Mycological Institute; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973;13:630–633. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozbay N, Newman SE. Biological control with Trichoderma spp. with emphasis on T. harzianum. Pak J Biol Sci. 2004;7:478–484. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mukhtar I. Influence of Trichoderma species on seed germination in okra. Mycopath. 2008;6:47–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lo CT, Lin CY. Screening strains of Trichoderma spp. for plant growth enhancement in Taiwan. Plant Pathol Bull. 2002;11:215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shake MU. Studies on sheath blight disease of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) caused by Rhizovtonia solani and its control [dissertation] Rajshahi: University of Rajshahi; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chang YC, Chang YC, Baker R, Kleifield O, Chet I. Increased growth of plants in the presence of the biological control agent Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Dis. 1986;70:145–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Windham MT, Elad Y, Baker R. A mechanism for increased plant growth induced by Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 1986;76:518–521. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanson LE. Reduction of verticillium wilt symptoms in cotton following seed treatment with Trichoderma virens. J Cotton Sci. 2000;4:224–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sultana N. Biological control of foot and root rot of lentil with Trichoderma harzianum [dissertation] Mymensingh: Bangladesh Agricultural University; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sumitra R, Gaikward SJ. Checking Fusarium wilt of pigeonpea by biological means. J Soil Crop. 1995;5:163–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harman GE. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol: changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis. 2000;84:377–393. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.da Luz WC, Bergstrom GC, Stockwell CA. Seed applied bioprotectants for control of seed-borne Pyrenophora triticirepentis and agronomic enhancement of wheat. Can J Plant Pathol. 1998;19:384–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Biswas KK, Das ND. Biological control of pigeon pea wilt caused by Fusarium udum with Trichoderma spp. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 1999;7:46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prasad RD, Rangeshwaran R, Anuroop CP, Rashmi HJ. Biological control of wilt and root rot of chickpea under field conditions. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 2002;10:72–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kashem MA, Naznin HA, Islam MM, Jalaluddin M, Hossain I. Effect of different methods of application of Trichoderma in controlling foot and root rot of lentil. Bangladesh J Seed Sci Tech. 2005;9:39–42. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES