Abstract
Synchronized network activity among groups of interconnected cells is essential for diverse functions in the brain. However, most studies have been made on cellular networks in the mature brain when chemical synapses have been formed. Much less is known about the situation earlier in development. When studying neural progenitors derived from embryonic stem cells and neural progenitors from mice embryos, we found networks of gap junction coupled cells with vivid spontaneous non-random calcium (Ca2+) activity driven by electrical depolarization that stimulated cell growth. Network activity was revealed by single-cell live Ca2+ imaging and further analyzed for correlations and network topology. The analysis revealed the networks to have small-world characteristics with scale-free properties. Taken together, these results demonstrate that immature cells in the developing brain organize in small-world networks that critically regulate neural progenitor proliferation.
Keywords: neural progenitors, networks, calcium signaling, stem cells, gap junctions
Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Ca2+ Activity in Neural Progenitor Cells
Cell signaling driven by Ca2+ is essential for all cell types1 since Ca2+ signals can activate important cell programs.2,3 Spontaneous Ca2+ activity (i.e., without externally applied stimuli) has been shown to regulate developmental events, including axon outgrowth and path-finding, synaptic connectivity and maturation of neuronal signaling properties.4-7 To understand how immature cells communicate with each other we performed time-lapse microscopy measuring intracellular Ca2+ levels in differentiating neurons. Neural progenitors derived from mouse embryonic stem cells exhibited clusters of vivid spontaneous Ca2+ activity.8
Several previous studies have described molecular mechanisms of intercellular Ca2+ waves in different cell types and tissues (for review see Leybaert and Sanderson).9 Two commonly described mechanisms involve release of ATP into the extracellular space through connexin hemichannels or intercellular diffusion of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphat through gap junctions, which both rely on Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Interestingly, the spontaneous Ca2+ activity we have described in neural progenitors is mainly driven by a different mechanism that seems to be largely independent of intracellular Ca2+ stores.
Using pharmacological inhibitors and gene knockdown we determined that the spontaneous Ca2+ activity in neural progenitors was critically dependent on gap junctions (Connexin 43) and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Electrophysiological recordings in vitro and in vivo confirmed that neural progenitors were capable of transmitting depolarizing currents through gap junctions. Inhibiting the functional networks by blocking gap junctions not only abolished the spontaneous Ca2+ activity but also reduced the proliferation rate in vitro and in vivo. In mouse embryos, blocking gap junctions decreased proliferation, which lead to brains smaller in size and significantly reduced cortical thickness. Interestingly, a few cells maintained their Ca2+ activity during the pharmacological inhibition, indicating the existence of “trigger cells” driving the network activity via gap junctions.
Three components were necessary for the spontaneous Ca2+ activity: gap junctions connecting neighboring cells within the network, functional voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane and “trigger cells” producing depolarizing currents which are spread through gap junctions, resulting in the activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and the subsequent increase of cytosolic Ca2+. The spontaneous Ca2+ activity described in neural progenitors was absent in embryonic stem cells. This is not due to lack of connectivity through gap junctions, since embryonic stem cells have been shown to express functional gap junctions,10 but is rather explained by the absence of functional voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.11 As the embryonic stem cells are differentiated toward neurons they gain functional voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and around the same point in time the networks of spontaneous Ca2+ activity emerges. However, it is not clear if the “trigger cells” start to generate the depolarizing currents at a similar time point as the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels become functional or even earlier during the differentiation process.
Neural Progenitors Organize in Small-World Networks
By applying mathematical cross-correlation analysis to single cell Ca2+ recordings we investigated if developing neurons were interconnected creating networks with small-world/scale-free properties. An example of a scale-free small-world network is how airlines connect the world through nodes of airports.12 A random disruption to one of the thousands of airport around the world would usually not disturb the flow of travelers, but a shutdown of a hub, such as Chicago O’Hare, could severely harm the network. Hence a scale-free small-world network has a good tolerance for random deletion of nodes, but low tolerance for a directed attack to a hub. Graph theory predicts that such network designs are effective for biological systems, since they enable efficient information transfer and robustness against failure of single cells.13 Cross-correlation analysis of our single cell Ca2+ data uncovered highly correlated clusters of cells. Additional analysis of network parameters revealed highly connected “hub cells” (scale-freeness), as well as high clustering (small-worldness). The spontaneous Ca2+ activity stimulated neural progenitor proliferation, which suggests that the network of connected cells would expand as the participating cells are more likely to divide compared with cells which are not part of the network. However, this is not a ubiquitous mechanism for cell proliferation, since we demonstrate that embryonic stem cells proliferate at a high rate without vivid spontaneous Ca2+ activity.8
The highly connected “hub cells” may be a different population of cells from the “trigger cells” driving the network activity. Recently, it was shown that the nodes one should control in order to control the entire network are usually not the hubs, but other less well connected nodes.14 The mechanisms of how the “trigger cells” generate the depolarizing currents and how they are maintained over time is not yet known.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that immature cells in the developing brain organize in small-world networks through gap junctions and that these network circuits critically regulate neural progenitor proliferation. Our data underscore the critical role of intricate cell signaling during embryonic development and show that complex network formations between immature cells in the brain exist well before birth.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/cib/article/24788
References
- 1.Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:517–29. doi: 10.1038/nrm1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weissman TA, Riquelme PA, Ivic L, Flint AC, Kriegstein AR. Calcium waves propagate through radial glial cells and modulate proliferation in the developing neocortex. Neuron. 2004;43:647–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu X, Hashimoto-Torii K, Torii M, Ding C, Rakic P. Gap junctions/hemichannels modulate interkinetic nuclear migration in the forebrain precursors. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4197–209. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4187-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blankenship AG, Feller MB. Mechanisms underlying spontaneous patterned activity in developing neural circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:18–29. doi: 10.1038/nrn2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Spitzer NC. Electrical activity in early neuronal development. Nature. 2006;444:707–12. doi: 10.1038/nature05300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wong RO, Chernjavsky A, Smith SJ, Shatz CJ. Early functional neural networks in the developing retina. Nature. 1995;374:716–8. doi: 10.1038/374716a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Spitzer NC. Activity-dependent neurotransmitter respecification. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:94–106. doi: 10.1038/nrn3154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malmersjö S, Rebellato P, Smedler E, Planert H, Kanatani S, Liste I, et al. Neural progenitors organize in small-world networks to promote cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E1524–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220179110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leybaert L, Sanderson MJ. Intercellular Ca(2+) waves: mechanisms and function. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:1359–92. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huettner JE, Lu A, Qu Y, Wu Y, Kim M, McDonald JW. Gap junctions and connexon hemichannels in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1654–67. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malmersjö S, Liste I, Dyachok O, Tengholm A, Arenas E, Uhlén P. Ca2+ and cAMP signaling in human embryonic stem cell-derived dopamine neurons. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1355–64. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guimerà R, Mossa S, Turtschi A, Amaral LA. The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7794–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407994102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:101–13. doi: 10.1038/nrg1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu YY, Slotine JJ, Barabási AL. Controllability of complex networks. Nature. 2011;473:167–73. doi: 10.1038/nature10011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]