Abstract
In the vasculature, physiological levels of nitric oxide (NO) protect against various stressors, including mechanical stretch. While endothelial NO production in response to various stimuli has been studied extensively, the precise mechanism underlying stretch-induced NO production in venous endothelial cells remains incompletely understood. Using a model of continuous cellular stretch, we found that stretch promoted phosphorylation of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) at Ser1177, Ser633 and Ser615 and NO production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Although stretch activated the kinases AMPKα, PKA, Akt, and ERK1/2, stretch-induced eNOS activation was only inhibited by kinase-specific inhibitors of PKA and PI3K/Akt, but not of AMPKα and Erk1/2. Similar results were obtained with knockdown by shRNAs targeting the PKA and Akt genes. Furthermore, inhibition of PKA preferentially attenuated eNOS activation in the early phase, while inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway reduced eNOS activation in the late phase, suggesting that the PKA and PI3K/Akt pathways play distinct roles in a time-dependent manner. Finally, we investigated the role of these pathways in stretch-induced endothelial exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion. Interestingly, we found that inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway increased stretch-induced Weibel-Palade body exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion, while inhibition of the PKA pathway had the opposite effects, suggesting that the exocytosis-promoting effect of PKA overwhelms the inhibitory effect of PKA-mediated NO production. Taken together, the results suggest that PKA and Akt are important regulators of eNOS activation in venous endothelial cells under mechanical stretch, while playing different roles in the regulation of stretch-induced endothelial exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion.
Introduction
The free radical nitric oxide (NO), produced by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), is an important vasoactive substance in normal vascular biology and pathophysiology. In addition to its well-known vascular functions such as vessel dilation and angiogenesis [1], [2], NO also regulates some of the key steps in thrombosis and inflammation, including platelet aggregation and monocyte adhesion [3], [4]. In endothelial cells (ECs), NO production by eNOS is stimulated by a variety of chemical substances such as vascular endothelial growth factor, thrombin, hydrogen peroxide and bradykinin, as well as by hemodynamic forces, including shear stress, transmural pressure, and mechanical stretch [5]–[10].
While the molecular mechanisms underlying eNOS activation and NO production in arterial ECs in response to chemical stimuli and shear stress have been studied extensively, little is known about the mechanism in venous ECs under continuous stretch. Actually, continuous stretch of venous ECs caused by the abrupt and sustained dilation of veins is frequently observed in patients with portal vein embolization, venous congestion due to acute heart failure, and venous-arterial grafts [11]–[14]. In addition, over-stretch of venous ECs may be closely associated with venous thrombosis and inflammation [15]. Accumulated evidence suggests that mechanical stretch can induce an inflammatory response in endothelial cells [16], [17]. Endothelial exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs), which contain von Willebrand factor (vWF), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and P-selectin, appears to be one of earliest events in the process of vascular inflammation [18], [19]. Recently, we showed that acute hypertensive stretch induces endothelial exocytosis and initiates the pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory responses of ECs [20]. On the other hand, NO production has inhibitory effects on venous thrombosis and inflammation [21], [22]. A previous study indicated that NO inhibits the endothelial exocytosis of WPBs via S-nitrosylation of N-Ethylmaleimide-sensitive Factor (NSF) [23]. Our recent study demonstrated that NO is also involved in the inhibition of stretch-induced endothelial exocytosis and vascular inflammation [20]. However, it is still unclear how stretch activates eNOS.
It is known that Ser1177 phosphorylation leads to increased eNOS activity and NO production [24]. So far, a series of protein kinases, including PKB/Akt, protein kinase A (PKA), PKG, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and calmodulin-dependent kinase II, has been shown to regulate the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS [25]–[30]. In addition to Ser1177, eNOS has several other potential phosphorylation sites, including Ser615 and Ser633, the phosphorylation of which enhances the activity of eNOS. It has been shown that Ser615 is phosphorylated in a PKB/Akt-dependent manner while Ser633 in a PKA-dependent manner [31], [32]. These results provide clues for investigating the regulatory pathways of stretch-induced eNOS activation and NO production in venous ECs.
Therefore, we set out to determine whether AMPK, Akt, PKA, and MAPK regulate the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) under continuous stretch by using kinase-specific inhibitors and gene-specific shRNAs.
Results
Stretch Stimulates eNOS Activation and NO Production in Venous ECs
We first confirmed the effect of stretch on the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production. Early reports suggest that under shear stress, sustained eNOS activation for as long as 30–60 min was detected [26], [36]. Therefore, we examined eNOS activation in ECs under stretch for as long as 120 min. The result showed that stretch induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS in a time-dependent manner without significant change in the amount of total eNOS protein and had no significant effect on cell death within 2 h (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1). The Ser1177 phosphorylation was apparent as early as 2 min after stretch and reached a peak at 30 min, detectable at 60 min and returned to the base level at 120 min. HUVECs were then subjected to mechanical stretch for 15 min for different magnitudes (20%–50%). We found that stretch induced the Ser1177 phosphorylation in a magnitude-dependent manner (Figure 1B). As the phosphorylation of eNOS Ser1177 is critical for NO production, we used DAF-FM (an NO species indicator) to assess the NO levels in HUVECs. The NO levels were significantly increased after stretch compared with the control. In addition, L-NAME (a NOS inhibitor) significantly inhibited the stretch-induced NO production (Fig. 1C, 1D).
Stretch Stimulates Phosphorylation of AMPKα, Akt, Erk1/2 and the Activation of PKA
Sustained eNOS activation by stretch as mentioned above prompted us to identify the kinases responsible for eNOS activation and their nature. Previous work has shown that AMPKα, Akt, Erk1/2 and PKA phosphorylate eNOS [24], [25], [29], [33]. Therefore, we determined whether these kinases are activated by mechanical stretch. Under static conditions, the phosphorylation of AMPK on Thr172, Akt on Ser473and Erk1/2 on Thr202/Tyr204 was relatively low. The phosphorylation of these kinases was evident after mechanical stretch but showed different time courses. The phosphorylation of AMPK and Erk1/2 increased as early as 2 min and peaked from 5 to 30 min, while that of Akt was delayed to 15 min, peaked at 30 min, and then returned to the control level at 2 h. In addition, we measured PKA activity using a phospho-PKA substrate antibody, and found that it peaked at 5 min and 15 min after mechanical stretch, returning to the control level at 1 h (Figure 2A, B).
AMPKα and ERK Pathways are not Involved in the Regulation of Stretch-induced Ser1177 Phosphorylation of eNOS and NO Production
The above results showing stretch-induced phosphorylation or activation of protein kinases prompted us to consider whether these kinases regulate the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production. We thus chose to use kinase-specific inhibitors and gene-specific shRNAs to investigate their regulation of eNOS phosphorylation. First, HUVECs were pretreated for 30 min with 5–50 µM Compound C, a highly-selective inhibitor of AMPKα, and then stretched for 15 min. Compound C had no significant effect on stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS, while it inhibited stretch-induced phosphorylation of AMPKα in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A). Then we used specific shRNA targeting the AMPKα1 gene and found that knock-down of AMPKα1 had a similar effect on Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS (Fig. 3B). In addition, PD98059, a selective inhibitor of MEK1/2, inhibited stretch-induced phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in a dose-dependent manner but had no significant effect on the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the inhibition of AMPKα and Erk1/2 had no significant effect on stretch-induced NO production (Fig. 3D). These results suggested that the AMPKα and ERK pathways are dispensable for regulation of stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS.
PKA Pathway Mediates Stretch-induced Ser1177 Phosphorylation of eNOS and NO Production in the Early Phase
To determine whether stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production is regulated by a PKA-dependent mechanism, HUVECs were pre-treated for 1 h with 10–100 µM H89, a PKA-specific inhibitor, and then stretched for 15 min. Treatment of the cells with H89 significantly attenuated the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS in a dose-dependent manner, while slightly increasing the phosphorylation of Akt (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, specific shRNAs targeting both PKA catalytic subunits α and β greatly reduced the stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and slightly increased the phosphorylation of Akt compared with the scrambled control (Fig. 4B), confirming a role of PKA in regulating eNOS activation and the interplay between PKA and Akt. In accord with these results, NO production was significantly inhibited in HUVECs pretreated with 50 µM H89 or expressing shRNAs targeting both PKA catalytic subunits after stretch for 15 min, compared with scrambled control (Fig. 4C). These results suggested that stretch induces Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production in the early phase (≤15 min) in a PKA-dependent manner. Interestingly, after stretch for >15 min Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production were not completely abolished but still slightly increased in the presence of 50 µM H89 or expressing the shRNAs targeting both PKA subunits, compared with unstretched cells (Fig. 4C–D). These results suggested that stretch induces Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production in the late phase in a PKA-independent manner.
PI3K/Akt Pathway Mediates Stretch-induced Ser1177 Phosphorylation of eNOS and NO Production in the Late Phase
The above results showed that the stretch-induced phosphorylation of Akt was relatively delayed. Therefore we speculated that Akt would regulate the late phase of stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production. First, HUVECs were pretreated for 30 min with 10–100 µM LY294002 (a PI3K inhibitor), and then subjected to stretch for 15 min. The LY294002 treatment abolished the stretch-induced phosphorylation of Akt in a dose-dependent manner but had no significant effect on the phosphorylation of eNOS under these conditions (Fig. 5A). However, at 30 min of stretch, LY294002 attenuated the stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). Then, specific shRNAs targeting both Akt1 and Akt2 significantly reduced the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS at 30 min of stretch but had no significant effect at 15 min of stretch compared with scrambled control (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, NO production did not change after stretching for 15 min but decreased after stretching for 30 min in HUVECs pretreated with 50 µM LY294002 or expressing the shRNAs targeting Akt1 and Akt2, compared with scrambled control (Fig. 5D). The above results suggested that stretch induces the late phase of eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation and NO production in an Akt-dependent manner.
Stretch Induces Ser633 Phosphorylation of eNOS in a PKA-dependent Manner and Ser615 Phosphorylation in a PI3K/Akt-dependent Manner
Previous work has shown that there are other potential phosphorylation sites in eNOS, including Ser633 and Ser615 [31], [32]. Therefore, we determined whether these two sites are phosphorylated by mechanical stretch. Under continuous stretch, the Ser633 phosphorylation increased as early as 2 min and peaked at 15 min, while the Ser615 phosphorylation was relatively delayed, peaked from 15 min to 60 min (Fig. 6A). Then, we used the above kinase-specific inhibitors to determine the role of these kinases in regulation of stretch-induced Ser633 and Ser615 phosphorylation of eNOS. We found that inhibition of the PKA pathway using H89 abolished the stretch-induced Ser633 phosphorylation but did not attenuate the stretch-induced Ser615 phosphorylation (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway using LY294002 abolished the stretch-induced Ser615 phosphorylation but did not affect the stretch-induced Ser633 phosphorylation (Fig. 6C). The above results demonstrated that the PKA pathway mediates stretch-induced Ser633 phosphorylation of eNOS while the PI3K/Akt pathway mediates stretch-induced Ser615 phosphorylation.
eNOS Activation and NO Production Negatively Regulate Stretch-induced WPB Exocytosis and Leukocyte Adhesion
NO has been shown to inhibit endothelial WPBs exocytosis, an early event in leukocyte adhesion [23]. We thus examined the effect of eNOS activation and NO production on stretch-induced endothelial WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion by using chemical inhibitors and gene-specific RNA knockdown (Fig. 7A and 7C). Stretch significantly enhanced endothelial WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion, consistent with our recent finding [20]. The increase in NO production by pretreatment of HUVECs with SNAP, an NO donor that provides exogenous NO, significantly attenuated the stretch-induced exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion. In contrast, the decrease in NO production by pretreatment of HUVECs with L-NAME, an inhibitor of NO production, intensified both of these processes (Fig. 7A, C). Consistently, the levels of stretch-induced exocytosis and adhesion were significantly intensified in HUVECs expressing the shRNAs of eNOS compared with scrambled control (Fig. 7B, D). Taken together, these results suggested that eNOS activation and NO production exert negative feedback on stretch-induced WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion.
Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt Pathway Increases Stretch-induced WPB Exocytosis and Leukocyte Adhesion While Inhibiting the cAMP/PKA Pathway has Opposite Effects
Using chemical inhibitors and gene-specific RNA knockdown, we further studied the role of PKA- and PI3K/Akt-mediated eNOS activation and NO production in stretch-induced WBP exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion in endothelial cells. As expected, inactivation of Akt by both LY294002, an inhibitor of the PI3K/Akt pathway, and the shRNAs targeting Akt1 and Akt2, significantly intensified the stretch-induced exocytosis (Fig. 8A, B) and adhesion (Fig. 8C, D). Unexpectedly, the inhibition of PKA by both H89, a PKA-specific inhibitor, and the shRNAs targeting the catalytic subunits (α and β) of PKA significantly attenuated the stretch-induced exocytosis and adhesion (Fig. 8). The cAMP/PKA pathway has been shown to mediate WPB exocytosis [34]. We thus speculated that the exocytosis-promoting effect of cAMP/PKA overwhelms the inhibitory effect of PKA-mediated NO production. To confirm this, we further examined the roles of the cAMP/PKA pathway in eNOS activation and in WPB exocytosis of ECs under stretch. First, HUVECs were pretreated with 5–50 µM Rp-cAMP (a cAMP competitor) for 1 h, and then stretched. We found that Rp-cAMP inhibited the stretch-induced exocytosis even though the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS was attenuated (Fig. 9A, B). Consistently, 0.1–10 mM 8-Br-AMP, an agonist for raising cAMP, significantly increased exocytosis as well as the Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS (Fig. 9C, D). These results indicated thatthe exocytosis-promoting effect of cAMP/PKAis stronger than the exocytosis-inhibiting effect of PKA-mediated NO production in ECs under stretch.
Discussion
The most important finding in the current study was that in venous ECs, mechanical stretch induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production via the PKA and PI3K/Akt pathways in a time-dependent manner. The PKA pathway regulates Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS and NO production in the early phase and the PI3K/Akt pathway in the late phase. In addition, the PKA pathway mediates stretch-induced Ser633 phosphorylation of eNOS, while the PI3K/Akt pathway mediates stretch-induced Ser615 phosphorylation in ECs. Although stretch-induced NO production acts as a negative feedback on stretch-induced WBP exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion, the PKA pathway shows overwhelming positive regulation while the PI3K/Akt pathway still shows negative regulation.
Our conclusion that PKA and Akt kinases play distinctive roles in the activation of eNOS in a time-dependent manner is based on the following lines of evidence: (1) stretch-induced activation of PKA pathway occurred relatively earlier than Akt pathway (Fig. 2); (2) inhibition of PKA pathway by kinase-specific inhibitor as well as gene-specific shRNAs significantly attenuated Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS by stretch in the early phase (≤15 min), whereas inhibition of Akt pathway by the inhibitor as well as gene-specific shRNAs decreased Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS in the late phase (>15 min) (Fig. 4, 5 ); (3) PKA-mediated Ser633 phosphorylation of eNOS by stretch occurred relatively earlier (from 2 to 15 min), compared to Akt-mediated Ser615 phosphorylation of eNOS (from 15 to 60 min) (Fig. 6). Taken together, stretch-induced activation of eNOS in ECs is controlled through such time-dependent coordinated regulation of PKA and Akt.
One possible explanation for the biphasic response is that the difference of the two signaling pathways is caused different rates of activation by upstream pathways. Previous work has shown that VEGFR2 and GPCRs are components of the mechanosensor complex in ECs [35], [36]. We showed that a cAMP antagonist attenuates stretch-induced eNOS activation, and it is conceivable that the cAMP level might increase under continuous stretch via GPCRs. Some reports have shown that VEGFR2-mediated activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway by mechanical stress is relatively delayed (within minutes) [37], [38], compared with the GPCR-mediated activation of the PKA pathway that occurs relatively quickly (within seconds) [39], [40]. Another possible explanation is that PKA may have higher or prior affinity for eNOS than Akt for Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS. A slight increase of Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS can be detected under stretch for 15 min in HUVECs after inhibition of the PKA pathway, while inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway does not attenuate stretch-induced Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS at this time point (Figs. 4 and 5). This result suggested that the activation of PKA plays dominant role in phosphorylating eNOS-Ser1177 in the early phase (≤15 min) and when PKA is inhibited or deactivated (>15 min), Akt replaces PKA and plays the main role in maintaining Ser1177 phosphorylation of eNOS until the recruitment of Hsp90 in the eNOS complex [26], [41]. It should be noted that stretch-induced eNOS activation and NO production by the PKA and Akt pathways were not absolutely separate. In fact, there was still some overlap between activation of the two pathways (Fig. 2).
In addition, our work showed that acute stretch induced Ser1177 phosphorylation in an AMPK-independent manner, although phosphorylation of AMPK was also significantly increased (Figs. 2 and 3). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that AMPK directly phosphorylates eNOS Ser1177 [42]. It has been reported that AMPK is also involved in shear stress-dependent eNOS activation [33]. The discrepancy might be due to the different features of shear stress and stretch. Previous work has demonstrated that shear stress is a protective stimulus [43], but over-stretch of ECs injures blood vessels. Thus, there might be different signaling pathways at play, due to the availability and kinetics of competing eNOS-activating kinases, and their reaction rates. In addition, it has also been suggested that AMPK activation alone might not be sufficient to trigger Ser1177phosphorylation of eNOS under certain conditions. For example, Thors et al found that eNOS becomes AMPK-responsive under conditions of ATP depletion but not when cellular ATP is high [44]. Thus, care should be taken when interpreting the role of AMPK in eNOS activation.
The present study suggested that stretch-induced eNOS activation and NO production attenuated but did not abolish stretch-induced WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion and acted as an auto-negative feedback for stretch-induced vascular inflammation. Thus we explored the role of cAMP/PKA- and PI3K/Akt-mediated NO production in stretch-induced WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion. Interestingly, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway increased the stretch-induced exocytosis and adhesion, while inhibition of the PKA pathway unexpectedly had the opposite effect (Fig. 8). Previous work has shown that the cAMP/PKA pathway also positively regulates WPB exocytosis via RalGDS [34]. It is most likely that the exocytosis-promoting effect of cAMP/PKA overwhelms the exocytosis-inhibiting effect of PKA-mediated NO production. Thus, the effect of PKA-mediated NO production is not evident in the regulation of stretch-induced WPB exocytosis and leukocyte adhesion. However, a negative role of PKA-mediated NO production is not excluded. In addition, NO has other physiological actions, such as short-term vessel dilation and long-term apoptosis, which need further investigation.
In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that time-dependent coordinated regulation of PKA and Akt kinase pathways is critical for the regulation of eNOS activation and NO production. Our results may provide a novel insight into the protective mechanism against vascular inflammation by mechanical stretch under pathological conditions in the early stage.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to Akt, PKACα, PKACβ and Erk2 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies to phospho-eNOS (Ser1177) and phospho-eNOS (Ser633) (for detecting eNOS activation) and eNOS were from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Rabbit antibody to phospho-eNOS (Ser615) was from Upstate (Millipore). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to phospho-PKA substrate, phospho-Akt (Ser473) (for detecting Akt activation), phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (for detecting AMPKα activation), AMPKα and phosphor-MEK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide), H89, LY294002 and 8-Br-cAMP were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). L-NAME, PP2 and Rp-cAMP were from Alexis (San Diego, CA). SNAP (S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine) and PD98059 were form Caymen Chemical. Compound C was from Merck Millipore. DAF-FM diacetate was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). The vWF ELISA kit was described previously [45].
RNA Interference
To silence eNOS, AMPKα1, Akt1/2 and PKA (catalytic subunits α and β), we used a commercial lentiviral system from Sigma to deliver short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). The target and control scrambled sequences were selected according to an open program (http://jura.wi.mit.edu/bioc/siRNAext/). The shRNA sequence targeting eNOS was 5′-GTGGCCAACGCCGTGAAGATC-3′; for PKA catalytic subunits α and β, 5′-GCTCCCTTCATACCAAAGTTT-3′ and 5′-CACAGCCCACTTGGATCAGTT-3′;for AMPKα1, 5′-GTACGACTAAGCCCAAATCTT-3′; for Akt1 and Akt2, 5′-GGAGGGTTGGCTGCACAAATT-3′ and 5′-CTCCTTGGCAAGGGAACCTTT -3′; and the control scrambled sequence was 5′-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG-3′.
Cell Culture
The origin and the culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) used in this manuscript have been described in the literature [45], [46]. The cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were used from passages 3 to 6. 293T and HL-60 cells were obtained from the ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum.
Biaxial Stretch of Cultured Cells
HUVECs were stretched on a device established for the study of static continuous stretch, which has been described in detail [47]. Serum-starved ECs were cultured on rat-tail collagen-coated silicone elastic membrane (Specialty MFG, MI) in a single-well device and were uniformly stretched by vertical indentation, resulting in sustained homogeneous strain of 20–50% (static control as 0%). All experiments were performed under 50% stretch unless otherwise noted.
ELISA Analysis
Confluent HUVECs were starved in serum-free M199 medium supplemented with 2% BSA for 4 h, and then stimulated by stretch or other factors. The supernatant was harvested and centrifuged at 3600 rpm at 4°C. The concentration of vWF was assessed by the standard sandwich ELISA procedure according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Annexin V/PI Staining
Confluent ECs were washed twice with cold PBS, fixed with 4% PFA supplemented with 0.2 mol/L sucrose for 1 hr at 4°C. After washing three times with PBS, ECs were stained with Annexin V/PI kits (Invitrogen V13241) according to the protocol and incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then washed another three times. ECs were also stained with DAPI.
Virus Preparation and Infection
Preparations of lentiviruses were made in 293T cells. Forty-eight hours after the cells were transfected, the virus-containing supernatant was harvested. Three milliliters of supernatant, mixed with 3 mL fresh M199 medium containing a final concentration of 8 µg/mL polybrene, was used to infect ECs as previously described [37]. The medium was replaced with normal M199 growth medium after 24 h, and HUVECs were harvested for experiments after 72 h infection.
Western-blot and Immunoprecipitation Analysis
Confluent HUVECs were starved in serum-free M199 medium supplemented with 1% BSA for 16 h before stimulation. The stimulated cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and lysed in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, 0.27 g/mL Na4P2O7, 5 g/mL aprotinin, 1 g/mL prostatin A, 1 g/mL antipan, 10 g/mL leupeptin, 1 mg/mL PMSF, 2 mM beta-glycerol phosphate, 10 mM NaF, and 2 mM Na3VO4. The lysates were fractionated on 8% SDS-PAGE, followed by standard Western blot analysis.
Measurement of Nitric Oxide Production
Confluent HUVECs were starved in serum-free M199 medium supplemented with 2% BSA for 3 h, and incubated with 5 µM DAF-FM diacetate in phenol red-free DMEM for 30 min at 37°C. Then the cells were washed gently with PBS and stimulated by stretch. The real-time changes in DAF fluorescence were recorded though a 40×oil-immersion lens and analyzed by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Zeiss, Germany).
In vitro Leukocyte Adhesion Assay
Confluent HUVECs were starved in serum-free M199 medium supplemented with 2% BSA for 4 h, and then stimulated by stretch for 30 min. Then the supernatant was discarded and 2×106 HL-60 cells were added to the surface of the endothelial cells. After 30-min incubation, the unbound cells were washed off 3 times with M199 medium, the bound cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and images were captured on a Nikon inverted microscope with a 20× objective lens. The numbers of bound HL-60 cells in each field were counted and analyzed by ANOVA. Representative results of three independent experiments are shown.
Statistics
Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. on the basis of triplicate experiments. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Iain C. Bruce for reading and editing the manuscript.
Funding Statement
Jincai Luo is supported by research grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2012CB945100) and the National Science Funds (No. 81170098, No. 81070115 and Project 31221002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Joannides R, Haefeli WE, Linder L, Richard V, Bakkali EH, et al. (1995) Nitric oxide is responsible for flow-dependent dilatation of human peripheral conduit arteries in vivo . Circulation 91: 1314–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Murohara T, Asahara T, Silver M, Bauters C, Masuda H, et al. (1998) Nitric oxide synthase modulates angiogenesisin response to tissue ischemia. J Clin Invest 101: 2567–2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang GR, Zhu Y, Halushka PV, Halushka PV, Lincoln TM, et al. (1998) Mechanism of platelet inhibition by nitric oxide: in vivo phosphorylation of thromboxane receptor by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 4888–4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kubes P, Suzuki M, Granger DN (1991) Nitric oxide: An endogenous modulator of leukocyte adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88, 4651–4655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5. Feliers D, Chen X, Akis N, Choudhury GG, Madaio M, et al. (2005) VEGF regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in glomerular endothelial cells. Kidney Int 68: 1648–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Motley ED, Eguchi K, Patterson MM, Palmer PD, Suzuki H, et al. (2005) Mechanism of endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation and activation by thrombin. Hypertension 49: 577–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sartoretto JL, Kalwa H, Shiroto T, Sartoretto SM, Pluth MD, et al.. (2012) Role of Ca2+ in the control of H2O2-modulated phosphorylation pathways leading to eNOS activation in cardiac myocytes. PLoS One 7; e44627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8. Lauer T, Kleinbongard P, Preik M, Rauch BH, Deussen A, et al. (2003) Direct biochemical evidence for eNOS stimulation by bradykinin in the human forearm vasculature. Basic Res Cardiol. 98: 84–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jin ZG, Wong C, Wu J, Berk BC (2005) Flow shear stress stimulates Gab1 tyrosine phosphorylation to mediate protein kinase B and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase activation in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 280, 12305–12309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Kuebler WM, Uhlig U, Goldmann T, Schael G, Kerem A, et al.. (2003) Stretch activates nitric oxide production in pulmonary vascular endothelial cells in situ. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168, 1391–1398. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Kawai M, Naruse K, Komatsu S, Kobayashi S, Nagino M, et al.. (2002) Mechanical stress-dependent secretion of interleukin 6 by endothelial cells after portal vein embolization: clinical and experimental studies. Journal of Hepatology 37, 240–246. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12. Meng X, Mavromatis K, Galis ZS (1999) Mechanical stretching of human saphenous vein grafts induces expression and activation of matrix-degrading enzymes associated with vascular tissue injury and repair. Exp Mol Pathol 66: 227–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cheng J, Du J (2007) Mechanical stretch simulates proliferation of venous smooth muscle cells through activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27: 1744–1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Colombo PC, Rastogi S, Onat D, Zacà V, Gupta RC, et al. (2009) Activation of endothelial cells in conduit veins of dogs with heart failure and veins of normal dogs after vascular stretch by acute volume loading. J Card Fail 15: 457–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Eriksson EE, Karlof E, Lundmark K, Rotzius P, Hedin U, et al. (2005) Powerful inflammatory properties of large vein endothelium in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 723–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kobayashi S, Nagino M, Komatsu S, Naruse K, Nimura Y, et al. (2003) Stretch-induced IL-6 secretion from endothelial cells requires NF-kappaB activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 308: 306–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ali MH, Pearlstein DP, Mathieu CE, Schumacker PT (2004) Mitochondrial requirement for endothelial responses to cyclic strain: implications for mechanotransduction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287: 486–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lowenstein CJ, Morrell CN, Yamakuchi M (2005) Regulation of Weibel-Palade body exocytosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med 15: 302–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Valentijn KM, van Driel LF, Mourik MJ, Hendriks GJ, Arends TJ, et al. (2010) Multigranular exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies in vascular endothelial cells. Blood 116: 1807–1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xiong Y, Hu Z, Han X, Jiang B, Zhang R, et al.. (2013) Hypertensive stretch regulates endothelial exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies through VEGF receptor 2 signaling pathways. Cell Res doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.56. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21. Pawlak R CE, Golatowski J, Azzadin A, Buczko W (1998) Nitric oxide and prostacyclin are involved in antithrombotic action of captopril in venous thrombosis in rats. Thromb Haemost 79: 1208–1212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wu J, Wadsworth RM, Kennedy S (2011) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase promotes vein graft neoadventitial inflammation and remodelling. J Vasc Res 48: 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Matsushita K, Yamakuchi M, Morrell CN, Ozaki M, O’Rourke B, et al. (2005) Vascular endothelial growth factor regulation of Weibel-Palade-body exocytosis. Blood 105: 207–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Hermann C, Busse R, et al. (1999) Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature 399: 601–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dixit M, Loot AE, Mohamed A, Fisslthaler B, Boulanger CM, et al. (2005) Gab1, SHP2, and protein kinase A are crucial for the activation of the endothelial NO synthase by fluid shear stress. Circ Res 97: 1236–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Boo YC, Sorescu G, Boyd N, Shiojima I, Walsh K, et al. (2002) Shear stress stimulates phosphorylation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase at Ser1179 by Akt-independent mechanisms: role of protein kinase A. J Biol Chem. 277: 3388–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Dimmeler S, Kemp BE, Busse R (2001) Phosphorylation of Thr (495) regulates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity. Circ Res 88: 68–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Butt E, Bernhardt M, Smolenski A, Kotsonis P, Fröhlich LG, et al. (2002) Endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (type III) is activated and becomes calcium independent upon phosphorylation by cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases. J Biol Chem 275: 5179–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bernier SG, Haldar S, Michel T (2000) Bradykinin-regulated interactions of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway with the endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 275: 30707–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Juliano L, Sartorettoa HK, Michael D, Lippard SJ, Michel T (2011) Hydrogen peroxide differentially modulates cardiac myocyte nitric oxide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 15792–15797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Boo YC, Hwang J, Sykes M, Michell BJ, Kemp BE, et al. (2002) Shear stress stimulates phosphorylation of eNOS at Ser(635) by a protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: 1819–1828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Michell BJ, Harris MB, Chen ZP, Ju H, Venema VJ, et al. (2002) Identification of regulatory sites of phosphorylation of the bovine endothelial nitric-oxide synthase at serine 617 and serine 635. J Biol Chem 277: 42344–42351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang Y, Lee TS, Kolb EM, Sun K, Lu X, et al. (2006) AMP-activated protein kinase is involved in endothelial NO synthase activation in response to shear stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26: 1281–1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rondaij MG, Bierings R, van Agtmaal EL, Gijzen KA, Sellink E, et al. (2008) Guanine exchange factor RalGDS mediates exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies from endothelial cells. Blood 112: 56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chachisvilis M, Zhang YL, Frangos JA (2006) G protein-coupled receptors sense fluid shear stress in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 15463–15468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Jin ZG, Ueba H, Tanimoto T, Lungu AO, Frame MD, et al. (2003) Ligand-independent activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 by fluid shear stress regulates activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circ Res 93: 354–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu J, Agarwal S (2010) Mechanical signals activate vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 to upregulate endothelial cell proliferation during inflammation. J Immunol 185: 1215–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gélinas DS, Bernatchez PN, Rollin S, Bazan NG, Sirois MG (2002) Immediate and delayed VEGF-mediated NO synthesis in endothelial cells: role of PI3K, PKC and PLC pathways. Br J Pharmacol137: 1021–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gudi S, Clark CB, Frangos JA (1996) Fluid flow rapidly activates G-proteins in human endothelial cells: involvement of G-proteins in mechanochemical signal transduction. Circ Res 79: 834–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Reich KM, Gay CV, Frangos JA (1990) Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production. J Cell Physiol 143: 100–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Brouet A, Sonveaux P, Dessy C, Balligand JL, Feron O (2001) Hsp90 ensures the transition from the early Ca2+-dependent to the late phosphorylation-dependent activation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelial growth factor-exposed endothelialcells. J Biol Chem 276: 32663–32669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chen ZP, Mitchelhill KI, Michell BJ, Stapleton D, Rodriguez-Crespo I, et al. (1999) AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of endothelial NO synthase. FEBS Lett 443: 285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dimmeler S, Hermann C, Galle J, Zeiher AM (1999) Upregulation of superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide synthase mediates the apoptosis-suppressive effects of shear stress on endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19: 656–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Thors B, Halldorsson H, Jonsdottir G, Thorgeirsson G (2008) Mechanism of thrombin mediated eNOS phosphorylation in endothelial cells is dependent on ATP levels after stimulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 1893–1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Xiong Y, Huo Y, Chen C, Zeng H, Lu X, et al. (2009) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 tyrosine 1175 signaling controls VEGF-induced von Willebrand factor release from endothelial cells via phospholipase C-gamma 1- and protein kinase A-dependent pathways. J Biol Chem 284: 23217–23224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lu Y, Xiong Y, Huo Y, Han J, Yang X, et al. (2011) Grb-2-associated binder 1 (Gab1) regulates postnatal ischemic and VEGF-induced angiogenesis through the protein kinase A-endothelial NOS pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 2957–2962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Liao XD, Wang XH, Jin HJ, Chen LY, Chen Q (2004) Mechanical stretch induces mitochondria -dependent apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and G2/M accumulation in cardiac fibroblasts. Cell Res 14: 16–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.