Abstract
Lysinibacillus sphaericus is a heterogeneous species that includes strains that produce mosquitocidal toxin proteins. Herein, we report the 4.56-Mb draft genome sequence of the nonpathogenic L. sphaericus strain KCTC 3346T, which provides clues for the phylogenetic reassessment of L. sphaericus species and an understanding of its physiological properties.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Lysinibacillus was first proposed as a novel genus related to Bacillus, owing to its distinctive peptidoglycan composition, phylogenetic analyses, and physiology (1). Lysinibacillus sphaericus (formerly known as Bacillus sphaericus) and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis produce insecticidal toxin proteins against mosquito larvae, and therefore, they have long been used for the biological control of vector species that transmit tropical diseases (2, 3). L. sphaericus strains are subdivided into five major groups (I to V) on the basis of their DNA homologies (4). Though these groups likely represent separate species, there are few phenotypic tests that are available to distinguish them. All mosquito-pathogenic strains belong to groups IIA and IIB (5), while the nonpathogenic strain KCTC 3346T (=ATCC 14577 = DSM 28 = IAM 13420) belongs to group I.
There is currently only one available complete genome sequence of L. sphaericus (that of strain C3-41) that has significantly higher activity against Culex spp. than the commercialized strain L. sphaericus 2362 (6). In this study, we chose the type strain of L. sphaericus for sequencing to provide genomic information that is indispensable for understanding the relatedness of L. sphaericus strains and their characteristics as potent agents for biological control.
KCTC 3346T was purchased from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures, and genome sequencing was carried out using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system by the National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management at Seoul National University (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Paired-end reads of 101 bp (3.33 Gb) produced from an ~450-bp genomic library were processed and de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench v6.0.4 (CLC bio). We obtained 75 scaffolds (≥179 bp) composed of 90 contigs (total contig length excluding scaffolded regions, 4,561,354 bp; 37.1% G+C content). The maximum contig length and N50 were 421,037 bp and 213,522 bp, respectively. No putative plasmid sequences were found in the assembly.
Automatic genome annotation was performed using the RAST server (7), which contains 4,499 protein-coding sequences and 86 tRNA genes, with 1,331 sequences (29.6%) annotated as hypothetical proteins. The closest neighbors suggested by the RAST server were Bacillus sp. NRRL B-14905 (8) and L. sphaericus C3-41 (6). However, the average nucleotide identity values between KCTC 3346T and B-14095 or C3-41, as calculated using the JSpecies program (9), were as low as ca. 78.5%. Moreover, genes encoding insecticidal toxins, such as Mtx and BinA/BinB, could not be identified from the assembled sequence. A 16-kb nonribosomal peptide synthetase/polyketide synthase (NRPS/PKS) gene cluster was found in contig 6_2, but no antibiotic activity was demonstrated against Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, Micrococcus luteus, or Escherichia coli. Plant growth-promoting activity against Arabidopsis thaliana was also not shown.
In summary, our analysis results further support that the species L. sphaericus should be dissected into different groups, as the aforementioned DNA homology studies and other experimental evidences have suggested. The availability of their genome sequences will provide insight into the relationships and functionalities of L. sphaericus strains.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AUOZ00000000. The version described in this paper is version AUOZ01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the Export Promotion Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, the Industrial Source Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (no. 10044909), and the KRIBB Research Initiative Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea.
Footnotes
Citation Jeong H, Jeong D-E, Sim YM, Park S-H, Choi S-K. 2013. Genome sequence of Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain KCTC 3346T. Genome Announc. 1(4):e00625-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00625-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ahmed I, Yokota A, Yamazoe A, Fujiwara T. 2007. Proposal of Lysinibacillus boronitolerans gen. nov. sp. nov., and transfer of Bacillus fusiformis to Lysinibacillus fusiformis comb. nov. and Bacillus sphaericus to Lysinibacillus sphaericus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:1117–1125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Berry C. 2012. The bacterium, Lysinibacillus sphaericus, as an insect pathogen. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 109:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Baumann P, Clark MA, Baumann L, Broadwell AH. 1991. Bacillus sphaericus as a mosquito pathogen: properties of the organism and its toxins. Microbiol. Rev. 55:425–436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Krych VK, Johnson JL, Yousten AA. 1980. Deoxyribonucleic acid homologies among strains of Bacillus sphaericus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:476–484 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rippere KE, Johnson JL, Yousten AA. 1997. DNA similarities among mosquito-pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of Bacillus sphaericus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:214–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hu X, Fan W, Han B, Liu H, Zheng D, Li Q, Dong W, Yan J, Gao M, Berry C, Yuan Z. 2008. Complete genome sequence of the mosquitocidal bacterium Bacillus sphaericus C3-41 and comparison with those of closely related Bacillus species. J. Bacteriol. 190:2892–2902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Siefert JL, Larios-Sanz M, Nakamura LK, Slepecky RA, Paul JH, Moore ER, Fox GE, Jurtshuk P., Jr. 2000. Phylogeny of marine Bacillus isolates from the Gulf of Mexico. Curr. Microbiol. 41:84–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:19126–19131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
