Skip to main content
Genes & Development logoLink to Genes & Development
. 2013 Aug 1;27(15):1650–1655. doi: 10.1101/gad.219287.113

Tango7 directs cellular remodeling by the Drosophila apoptosome

Alejandro D'Brot 1, Po Chen 1, Mahesh Vaishnav 1, Shujun Yuan 2, Christopher W Akey 3, John M Abrams 1,4
PMCID: PMC3744723  PMID: 23913920

In addition to mediating caspase-dependent cell death, the apoptosome can drive nonapoptotic caspase activation to remodel cells. D'Brot et al. find that Tango7 collaborates with the Drosophila apoptosome to drive a caspase-dependent remodeling process needed to resolve individual sperm from a syncytium. Tango7 localizes to the active apoptosome compartment and stimulates its activity. These findings suggest that Tango7 specifies the Drosophila apoptosome for cellular remodeling.

Keywords: apoptosome, cellular remodeling, caspase activity, apoptosis, cell death

Abstract

It is now well appreciated that the apoptosome, which governs caspase-dependent cell death, also drives nonapoptotic caspase activation to remodel cells. However, the determinants that specify whether the apoptosome acts to kill or remodel have yet to be identified. Here we report that Tango7 collaborates with the Drosophila apoptosome to drive a caspase-dependent remodeling process needed to resolve individual sperm from a syncytium. In these cells, Tango7 is required for caspase activity and localizes to the active apoptosome compartment via its C terminus. Furthermore, Tango7 directly stimulates the activity of this complex in vitro. We propose that Tango7 specifies the Drosophila apoptosome as an effector of cellular remodeling.


Apoptosis is the most common form of programmed cell death (PCD) and is intimately involved in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease (Fuchs and Steller 2011). Throughout the animal kingdom, execution of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway relies on the activation of the apoptosome. In Drosophila, this involves oligomerization of the initiator caspase pro-Dronc with the adaptor protein Dark to form the apoptosome complex (Ryoo and Baehrecke 2010). Apoptosome assembly converts the pro-Dronc zymogen into active Dronc, which subsequently activates executioner caspases Drice and Dcp-1. Upon dissociation from Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (DIAP1), these caspases then cleave a specific subset of cellular substrates that, through a variety of mechanisms, leads to cell suicide and engulfment by macrophages (Hay and Guo 2006).

Paradoxically, apoptosome activity has recently been shown to drive diverse cellular processes without promoting cell death (Feinstein-Rotkopf and Arama 2009). Examples of cellular remodeling such as enucleation of erythroblasts (Carlile et al. 2004), keratinocytes (Lippens et al. 2000) and lens fiber cells (Ishizaki et al. 1998); differentiation of macrophages (Sordet et al. 2002); formation of platelet cells from megakaryocytes (De Botton et al. 2002); dendritic pruning (Kuo et al. 2006; Williams et al. 2006); and, most recently, synaptic plasticity in the developing brain (Chen et al. 2012) have all been shown to require the apoptosome and/or caspase activity. An early precedent for caspase-dependent cellular remodeling came from studies of spermatid individualization in Drosophila (Arama et al. 2003, 2006; Huh et al. 2004). During this process, active caspases that can be visualized as syncytial spermatids are resolved into mature individual sperm through a specialized cytoskeletal structure known as the individualization complex (IC), which eliminates excess cytoplasmic content and encapsulates each sperm in plasma membrane (Fabrizio et al. 1998). In vivo, this process requires the apoptosome and caspase activity, since mutations in Dark or Dronc prevent normal caspase activation and coordinated IC movement, resulting in spermatogenesis defects and male sterility (Rodriguez et al. 1999; Huh et al. 2004; Arama et al. 2006).

These and other studies establish an essential role for the apoptosome, but whether this complex might be converted from a machine that demolishes cells to an engine that remodels them is not known. Furthermore, because the apoptosome is often sufficient for killing, prevailing models do not adequately explain how this complex functions without provoking apoptotic cell death. Through genetic and biochemical analysis, we found that Tango7, previously described by our group as an effector of cell death (Chew et al. 2009), collaborates with the apoptosome to remodel syncytial spermatid cysts during the individualization process. Collectively, our observations suggest that Tango7 physically recruits the apoptosome to specify this complex for nonapoptotic remodeling of spermatids.

Results and Discussion

In order to characterize Tango7 function in vivo, we accessed a community resource (Cooper et al. 2008) to screen a heavily mutagenized second chromosome collection for deleterious point mutations in the Tango7 locus. Ten Tango7 variants were recovered and placed in trans to deficiencies that delete the Tango7 locus (see the Materials and Methods). One variant was lethal, another was viable but male-sterile, and the remaining variants had no obvious phenotypes. We confirmed the lethal variant to be nonsense mutation Q135* and the male-sterile variant to be nonsense mutation W358*, which we designated Tango7E and Tango7L, respectively. Complementation studies revealed that Tango7E is a null allele and Tango7L is a hypomorphic allele. Specifically, Tango7E is lethal at the first instar larval stage when tested in trans to itself and Df(2R)Exel7130, a deficiency that uncovers Tango7. Tango7L, however, is viable but male-sterile in all allelic combinations (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, tango7L/L flies are healthier than tango7L/E flies, which mostly die during eclosion or soon thereafter. To confirm that Tango7L produces a truncated protein, we blotted lysates from wild-type, heterozygous mutant, or homozygous mutant tissue with a monoclonal Tango7 antibody (Fig. 1C; for antibody, see the Materials and Methods). Samples from cultured Kc167 cells, wild-type embryos, and wild-type testes all showed a prominent band at the expected ∼44-kD size (Fig. 1C). The premature stop in the Tango7E allele eliminates the epitope recognized by anti-Tango7, but as seen in Figure 1C, heterozygous Tango7L/+ testes produced both the full-length protein and the predicted shorter variant at ∼40 kD. Furthermore, the homozygous tango7L/L testes produced only the shorter variant, as expected (Fig. 1C). Taken together, we conclude that Tango7E is a null allele and Tango7L is a hypomorphic allele expressing a truncated variant that lacks the C-terminal 30 amino acids.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Tango7 is an essential gene, and its C terminus is required for male fertility. (A) Tango7 encodes a 387-amino-acid protein with a conserved PCI domain. Two nonsense mutaions were recovered by FLY-TLL (arrowheads above gene structure). Gray boxes are exons, and white boxes are untranslated regions. (B) Tango7L is viable but male-sterile in all allelic combinations. Tango7E is lethal in trans to itself and Df(2R)Exel7130 and semiviable in trans to Tango7L. Viable tango7 mutants also exhibited a “wrinkled” wing phenotype characteristic of W1 mutants, a dominant Hid allele (Abbott and Lengyel 1991). A genomic fragment rescue, Tango7VK006, rescued viability, male sterility, and the wrinkled wing phenotype of tango7 mutants. (C) Lysates from Kc167 cultured cells, wild-type embryos, and testes of various genotypes were blotted with anti-Tango7 (see the Materials and Methods). Note that the mutant Tango7L protein was stably expressed in both heterozygote and mutant testes in lanes 3 and 4, respectively. (Lane 5) One copy of the Tango7VK006 rescue (R) in the mutant background effectively expresses the full-length protein in the testes.

Like dark and dronc mutants (Rodriguez et al. 1999; Chew et al. 2004; Huh et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2005; Arama et al. 2006), all viable tango7 mutants were male-sterile and exhibited several wing phenotypes (Fig. 1B). A wrinkled wing phenotype characteristic of cell death mutants (Abbott and Lengyel 1991; Grether et al. 1995) appears at a modest frequency in tango7L/L adults and at higher frequencies in tango7L/E and tango7L/Df(2R)Exel7130 flies (Fig. 1B; Supplemental Fig. 1). We also noted a low penetrance of mild blemishing and upward curved wings (Supplemental Fig. 1), similar to mutants for Dark and Dronc (Chew et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2005).

Although viable tango7 mutants exhibit wing phenotypes characteristic of apoptotic mutants (Abbott and Lengyel 1991; Chew et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2005), we did not observe global cell death defects in zygotic null embryos as examined by acridine orange staining (Abrams et al. 1993). It is possible that, like dark and dronc embryos, zygotic expression of Tango7 might be dispensable for embryonic PCD because of maternally loaded transcript (Chew et al. 2004; Akdemir et al. 2006). In support of this, we detected abundant Tango7 transcript in Df(2R)Exel7130 homozygous embryos that genetically lack the Tango7 locus (Supplemental Fig. 2). Therefore, like other apoptosome mutants (Chew et al. 2004; Akdemir et al. 2006), zygotic sources of Tango7 are not rate-limiting for most cell deaths in the embryo. To test for more subtle phenotypes, we stained for markers that detect supernumerary cells in known cell death-defective mutants (Rogulja-Ortmann et al. 2007). In tango7L/E embryos produced by tango7L/L females, extra dHb9+ neurons were detected, but persisting Kr+ cells were not seen (Supplemental Fig. 2C–F). Therefore, Tango7L exhibits maternal effect PCD-associated phenotypes in some but not all contexts.

To determine whether the sterility of tango7 males, like apoptosome mutants (Rodriguez et al. 1999; Huh et al. 2004; Arama et al. 2006), might be caused by defective caspase activation prior to spermatid individualization, we stained wild-type, tango7L/L, and tango7L/E testes with cleaved Caspase-3 antibody (anti-CC3), a marker of Dronc substrate cleavage (Fan and Bergmann 2010). Strikingly, tango7 mutant testes completely failed to stain for anti-CC3, indicating that Dronc fails to cleave its substrates in tango7 mutant cysts (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, wild-type and tango7 mutant spermatids were similarly positive for AXO49 (Fig. 2B), a marker for advanced spermatogenesis (Bressac et al. 1995). Therefore, the absence of anti-CC3 staining in tango7 mutants reflects an authentic and specific failure in caspase activation rather than developmental arrest.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

tango7 mutants are defective for caspase activity and apoptosome-dependent cellular remodeling. (AE) Confocal micrographs of immunofluorescence on whole-mount testes. (A) Testes stained with anti-CC3, a surrogate for Dronc substrate cleavage (Fan and Bergmann 2010). Spermatid cysts in wild-type testes are positive for anti-CC3, but >90% of tango7 mutant cysts failed to stain, reflecting a defect in Dronc activity (∼10% stained weakly for anti-CC3). (B) Testes stained with anti-AXO49, which binds polyglycated β2 tubulin at the onset of individualization (Bressac et al. 1995). tango7 mutant cysts are positive for anti-AXO49, indicating that spermatogenesis proceeds normally in these mutants. Signal here was pseudocolored cyan. (C) Testes stained with phalloidin, which binds to the actin in ICs (open arrowheads). Wild-type ICs form at the basal end of cysts and then migrate toward the distal end, whereas tango7 mutant ICs form at the basal end but then either stall or move in an asynchronous fashion (see also Fig. 3F). (D,E) One copy of the Tango7VK006 rescue fragment restored fertility, caspase activation (anti-CC3), and individualization (phalloidin) in spermatid cysts of tango7L/L (D) and tango7E/E (E) testes. (F) Schematic of spermatid individualization in the testes. Each spermatid cyst (gray lines) contains 64 syncytial spermatids. Caspase activation occurs upon formation of the IC at spermatid nuclei and is most prominent at the cystic bulge, which forms as the IC translocates through the syncytia. The inset shows a more detailed view of the cystic bulge, where 64 syncytial spermatids (only four are shown for simplicity) are resolved into individual sperm by the IC and wrapped in their own plasma membrane (black lines). Arrows represent direction of individualization. (Red) caspase activation; (blue) nuclei; (yellow) IC. Bars, 150 μm.

To examine whether failure in caspase activation was coupled to spermatid individualization defects, we stained wild-type and tango7 mutant testes with phalloidin, which binds to the actin of the investment cones that make up the IC. In wild-type testes, ICs form at the nuclei of spermatids and then migrate synchronously through the syncytia toward the opposite end of the cyst, expelling cytoplasmic content and wrapping each sperm in plasma membrane (Fig. 2F). However, like animals compromised for dronc and dark (Huh et al. 2004), tango7 mutant ICs do form properly but either stall at the nuclei or move asynchronously through the syncytia (Figs. 2C, 3F).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Tango7 localizes to the active apoptosome compartment via its C terminus in individualizing spermatids. Confocal micrographs of immunofluorescence on whole-mount testes. (AC″) Wild-type testes stained with anti-Tango7 and anti-CC3, a marker of Dronc substrate cleavage (Fan and Bergmann 2010). (AA″) Tango7 colocalizes with anti-CC3 in the cystic bulge (white box) and in waste bags (yellow box), which harbor active Dronc caspase (Huh et al. 2004). (BB″) Higher magnification of the cystic bulge in A. (CC″) Higher magnification of a waste bag from a different wild-type testis. (DF) Testes stained with DAPI (blue), anti-Tango7 (green), and phalloidin (red). (D) In wild-type testes, Tango7 is associated with the IC in the cystic bulge (white box) and the waste bag (yellow box). (E) Higher magnification of the cystic bulge in D. (Inset) Within the cystic bulge, Tango7 is discretely localized to the upper edge of investment cones (yellow arrow). (F) In tango7L/L testes, the C-terminal truncated Tango7L protein failed to localize to the upper edge of investment cones (inset, yellow arrow), and ICs move asynchronously (white arrows). Bars: A–A″,D, 150 μm; B–C″, 50 μm; E,F, 25 μm. Curved arrows represent direction of individualization.

To definitively assign these phenotypes to Tango7, we generated a rescue strain by site-specific integration of a 20-kb bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) spanning the Tango7 locus into the fly genome, which we named Tango7VK006. One copy of this genomic fragment expresses full-length Tango7 in the testes at levels comparable with wild-type (Fig. 1C) and can effectively rescue sterility (Fig. 1B) as well as caspase activation and individualization defects in tango7L/L and tango7E/E males (Fig. 2D,E). Additionally, Tango7VK006 reversed the lethality of the Tango7E allele, the semiviability of tango7L/E adults, and all of the observed wing phenotypes (Fig. 1B). Taken together, these genetic data demonstrate that, like the apoptosome components Dronc and Dark, Tango7 is similarly required for nonapoptotic caspase activation and individualization in the Drosophila testes.

In spermatids that are being remodeled, the active apoptosome localizes to the IC at the nuclei and the cystic bulge, as indicated by active Dronc staining (Huh et al. 2004). To determine whether Tango7 also localizes to this structure, we stained wild-type testes with anti-Tango7. Indeed, Tango7 conspicuously localized to the cystic bulge and the waste bag (Fig. 3A–E, white and yellow boxes). Furthermore, this protein notably colocalized with anti-CC3 at these structures but not at other regions (Fig. 3A–C″), suggesting that Tango7 plays a role in caspase activation specifically at the IC. We further observed that Tango7 discretely localized to the leading edge of wild-type investment cones in the cystic bulge (Fig. 3E, yellow arrow). In contrast, the truncated Tango7L protein (which lacks C-terminal 30 amino acids) was notably absent from the leading edge of asynchronously moving investment cones in tango7L/L spermatids (Fig. 3F, yellow arrow). These findings suggest that the extreme C terminus of Tango7 is required for its localization to the IC and thus its function in cellular remodeling.

Our in vivo observations suggest that Tango 7 genetically interacts with the apoptosome to regulate nonapoptotic caspase function. To test whether Tango7 might directly affect apoptosome activity, we reconstituted the apoptosome in vitro using recombinant Dronc and Dark in the presence or absence of recombinant Tango7 and assayed for caspase activity using catalytically dead pro-DriceC/A as a substrate. As seen in Figure 4A, the presence of Tango7 stimulated cleavage of pro-DriceC/A by the apoptosome in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). This enhancing effect was heat-sensitive (Fig. 4B, lane 3) and was not seen when a catalytically dead active site Dronc mutant (Meier et al. 2000) was used (Fig. 4B, lane 4). Furthermore, consistent with previous studies on the fly apoptosome (Yuan et al. 2011), cytochrome c was not similarly active in these assays (Supplemental Fig. 3C). To probe whether Tango7 interacts with the apoptosome directly, we tested for interactions between recombinant proteins in vitro. Tango7 did not interact with an irrelevant His-tagged protein (Supplemental Fig. 3G) but did bind to Dronc or Dark individually or together (Fig. 4C). Combined, these results show that Tango7 can directly stimulate apoptosome activity in vitro.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Tango7 interacts with components of the apoptosome and stimulates apoptosome activity. (A,B) Apoptosome activity assays detecting cleavage of pro-Drice substrate by the apoptosome. In A and B, filled arrowheads denote substrate (pro-DriceC/A-6xHis), and open arrowheads indicate product (cleaved DriceC/A-6xHis). (A) Tango7 stimulates cleavage of Drice by the apoptosome in a dose-dependent manner. The top blot in A is a lighter exposure of the pro-DriceC/A band, indicated by an asterisk. (B) This stimulation effect by Tango7 was heat-sensitive (lane 3), and the appearance of product required wild-type Dronc (lanes 4,5). H in lane 3 indicates that Tango7 was heat-inactivated before it was added to the reaction. M in lanes 4 and 5 indicates that recombinant active site mutant Dronc, DroncC/A, was used. (C) Tango7 directly interacts with Dark and Dronc in vitro. Recombinant 6xHis-Dark-6xHis, Dronc-6xHis, and Tango7-V5-6xHis were incubated together in the combinations indicated. Complexes were immunoprecipitated using anti-V5 and detected using anti-His. This interaction is specific, as Tango7 does not pull down an irrelevant protein control (Supplemental Fig. 3C). An asterisk indicates a cross-reacting background band. (D,E) Tango7 physically interacts with Dark and Dronc in cultured cells. (D) Flag-Dronc interacted with Tango7-V5 in cultured cells. Notice that Flag-Dronc also bound a post-translationally modified form of Tango7, Tango7-V5*. This modified form of Tango7 was not affected by phosphatase treatment (data not shown). (E) Tango7-V5 interacted with Dark-Myc in cultured cells. Input controls for A–C and reciprocal immunoprecipitations for D and E can be found in Supplemental Figure 3.

To test whether similar physical interactions occurred in vivo, we performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments in cultured S2R+ cells cotransfected with Tango7-V5 and either Flag-Dronc or Dark-Myc constructs. In these experiments, Tango7 interacted with Dronc (Supplemental Fig. 3A) and with Dark (Fig. 4E). Likewise, in reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments, these same interactions were detected (Fig. 4D; Supplemental Fig. 3B). In these assays, we also observed that Dronc and Dark interacted with a modified form of Tango7 (Fig. 4D; Supplemental Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results demonstrate that Tango7 interacts with the apoptosome components Dark and Dronc in vitro and in vivo.

Like animals mutated for apoptosome genes, we show here that viable Tango7 males are sterile because they fail to initiate a caspase-dependent process that remodels syncytial cysts to produce individualized sperm. These characteristic defects established a classic precedent for how apoptosome activation does not inevitably drive cell killing but can instead be repurposed for nonapoptotic processes during spermatogenesis (Arama et al. 2003; Huh et al. 2004; Feinstein-Rotkopf and Arama 2009). How might Tango7 collaborate with the apoptosome as spermatids are remodeled? Since Tango7 was originally described in a collection of targets linked to Golgi organization (Bard et al. 2006), we examined a Golgi marker in tango7L/L tissue but found no indication that this organelle was affected (Supplemental Fig. 4). Studies of Tango7 orthologs in Caenorhabditis elegans (Luke-Glaser et al. 2007) and in yeast (Zhou et al. 2005) suggest that the protein could also act as a noncore factor associated with the COP9 signalosome complex and/or the eIF3 translation complex. These modalities could certainly be relevant in vivo, but the in vitro activities seen here with recombinant Tango7 (Fig. 4A,B) suggest functions independent from these multiprotein complexes. Furthermore, since tango7L/L mutants are fully viable, it seems doubtful that systemic defects in either of these complexes can account for caspase-dependent spermatogenesis defects seen in these animals. Instead, we propose that Tango7 directly engages the apoptosome to specify this holoenzyme for cellular remodeling. Several pivotal observations support this. First, the action of Tango7 is clearly required for apoptosome-dependent caspase activity and remodeling of spermatids. Second, Tango7 localizes to the active holoenzyme compartment in vivo and physically binds apoptosome proteins in vitro and in cultured cells. Third, Tango7 is one of few proteins (and the first of its kind in Drosophila) able to stimulate apoptosome activity in vitro. Together these observations suggest that Tango7 functions as a direct regulatory component of this complex, acting also perhaps as a scaffold or chaperone that could promote remodeling by recruiting the active apoptosome to the IC. Consistent with this, Tango7L (which truncates 30 amino acids from the C terminus) fails to localize to the IC in caspase-defective tango7L/L testes. Furthermore, like active Dronc, Tango7 localized to the investment cones of migrating ICs and correlated with active caspases at this structure but not with anti-CC3 staining elsewhere in the testes. To further explore this scenario, we sought to localize active Dronc in tango7 spermatids, but unfortunately, this particular antisera is no longer available. Nevertheless, combined with our genetic observations, these data establish that the C terminus of Tango7 is dispensable for viability but required for apoptosome-dependent remodeling and localization to the IC. Hence, Tango7L is an allele-specific variant that uncouples essential functions from nonessential functions. Consistent with this, Tango7L clones grew normally, but Tango7E clones arrested after several cell divisions (Supplemental Fig. 5).

Mechanisms that recruit the apoptosome to a subcellular structure, together with restraints imposed by the ubiquitin–proteasome system (Kuo et al. 2006; Arama et al. 2007; Kaplan et al. 2010), could limit caspase activity within discrete subcellular compartments. This scenario explains how partial demolition of subcellular structures might occur, but conceivably, the apoptosome could also exert constructive roles during remodeling as well. Therefore, it will be interesting to investigate whether properties of the apoptosome (e.g., substrate specificity) are affected by Tango7. Likewise, it would also be interesting to test whether Tango7 is generally needed to remodel cells in other tissues (Geisbrecht and Montell 2004; Kuo et al. 2006) or whether Tango7 counterparts might be similarly required in other species. Viewed from this perspective, the Tango7L truncation allele opens unique opportunities for investigating how the apoptosome is diverted from cell suicide functions toward cell remodeling activity.

Materials and methods

Fly strains and husbandry

CantonS flies were used as wild-type controls. Tango7L and Tango7E alleles were recovered by the Seattle Drosophila TILLING Project (Cooper et al. 2008), which screened for point mutations in the second chromosome CantonS-derived Hawley lines. Variants were placed in trans to Df(2R)Exel7130 and Df(2R)50C-38, which uncover the Tango7 locus.

Immunofluorescence

Whole-mount testes were dissected in PBS, fixed, and stained as described in Arama et al. (2003), except that PBT (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween) was used for washes, and PBTA (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween, 1.5% BSA) was used for blocking and incubations with antibodies. The following antibodies and dilutions were used: rabbit anti-CC3 (Cell Signaling) at 1:500, mouse anti-AXO49 (Bressac et al. 1995) at 1:20, rhodamine-phalloidin (Invitrogen Molecular Probes) at 1:40; mouse anti-Tango7 (1N13) at 1:1000, and rabbit anti-GM130 at 1:500 (Abcam). Alexa-488 and Alexa-568 secondary antibodies (Invitrogen Molecular Probes) were used at 1:250. A custom monoclonal antibody (1N13) against Tango7 was raised at Abmart Antibody Company against epitope ELLGTYTADN. Micrographs were taken with Leica TCS SP5 and Zeiss LSM780 laser confocal microscopes.

Caspase activity assay

Activity assays were performed as in Yuan et al. (2011). Recombinant 6xHis-Dark-6His, Dronc-6His, and Tango7-V5-6His were mixed on ice, incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and then incubated overnight at 25°C to form the apoptosome complex. The next day, recombinant pro-DriceC/A-6His was added and incubated for 6 h at 25°C. Subsequently, the proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti-His-HRP antibody (Invitrogen).

Immunoprecipitation

For in vitro immunoprecipitations, recombinant 6His-Dark-6His, Dronc-6His, and Tango7-V5-6His were mixed on ice, incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and then incubated overnight at 25°C to form the apoptosome complex. The proteins were diluted in buffer A (20 mM HEPES-KOH at pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM sodium EDTA, 1 mM sodium EGTA, 1 mM DTT) and immunoprecipitated using anti-V5 antibody (Bethyl Laboratories) and protein G Dynabeads. For immunoprecipitations from cells, equal amounts of cell lysates were precleared with 40 μL of protein A/G Sepharose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h at 4°C. Lysates were then incubated overnight at 4°C with 2 μg of mouse anti-V5 (Bethyl Laboratories), rabbit anti-Myc (Invitrogen), or rabbit anti-Flag (Sigma). The following day, 40 μL of protein A/G Sepharose was added to the lysates, and the complexes were allowed to bind to the beads for 2 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were then washed three times with 1 mL of ice-cold Triton lysis buffer, and the bound complexes were eluted with SDS sample buffer.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoquin Tu, Nichole Link, and Leslie Durham for help with experiments and reagents. We are grateful to Marie-Hélène Bré for the AXO49 antibody, Joachim Seemann for the GM130 antibody, and Peter Michaely for the NV18-6His recombinant protein. We thank Angela Diehl for the individualization schematic. We thank the rest of the Abrams laboratory for their support and expertise, and Dr. Michael Buszczak and Dr. Robin Hiesinger for their advice and comments. This work was supported by grants to J.M.A. from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM072124), Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RP110076), the Ellison Foundation (AG-SS-2743-11), and the Welch Foundation (grant no. I-1727). This work was performed in laboratories constructed with support from NIH grant C06 RR30414.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available for this article.

References

  1. Abbott MK, Lengyel JA 1991. Embryonic head involution and rotation of male terminalia require the Drosophila locus head involution defective. Genetics 129: 783–789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrams JM, White K, Fessler LI, Steller H 1993. Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 117: 29–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akdemir F, Farkas R, Chen P, Juhasz G, Medved'ova L, Sass M, Wang L, Wang X, Chittaranjan S, Gorski SM, et al. 2006. Autophagy occurs upstream or parallel to the apoptosome during histolytic cell death. Development 133: 1457–1465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arama E, Agapite J, Steller H 2003. Caspase activity and a specific cytochrome c are required for sperm differentiation in Drosophila. Dev Cell 4: 687–697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arama E, Bader M, Srivastava M, Bergmann A, Steller H 2006. The two Drosophila cytochrome c proteins can function in both respiration and caspase activation. EMBO J 25: 232–243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arama E, Bader M, Rieckhof GE, Steller H 2007. A ubiquitin ligase complex regulates caspase activation during sperm differentiation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 5: e251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bard F, Casano L, Mallabiabarrena A, Wallace E, Saito K, Kitayama H, Guizzunti G, Hu Y, Wendler F, Dasgupta R, et al. 2006. Functional genomics reveals genes involved in protein secretion and Golgi organization. Nature 439: 604–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressac C, Bre MH, Darmanaden-Delorme J, Laurent M, Levilliers N, Fleury A 1995. A massive new posttranslational modification occurs on axonemal tubulin at the final step of spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Eur J Cell Biol 67: 346–355 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlile GW, Smith DH, Wiedmann M 2004. Caspase-3 has a nonapoptotic function in erythroid maturation. Blood 103: 4310–4316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen SX, Cherry A, Tari PK, Podgorski K, Kwong YK, Haas K 2012. The transcription factor MEF2 directs developmental visually driven functional and structural metaplasticity. Cell 151: 41–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chew SK, Akdemir F, Chen P, Lu WJ, Mills K, Daish T, Kumar S, Rodriguez A, Abrams JM 2004. The apical caspase dronc governs programmed and unprogrammed cell death in Drosophila. Dev Cell 7: 897–907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chew SK, Chen P, Link N, Galindo KA, Pogue K, Abrams JM 2009. Genome-wide silencing in Drosophila captures conserved apoptotic effectors. Nature 460: 123–127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooper JL, Greene EA, Till BJ, Codomo CA, Wakimoto BT, Henikoff S 2008. Retention of induced mutations in a Drosophila reverse-genetic resource. Genetics 180: 661–667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Botton S, Sabri S, Daugas E, Zermati Y, Guidotti JE, Hermine O, Kroemer G, Vainchenker W, Debili N 2002. Platelet formation is the consequence of caspase activation within megakaryocytes. Blood 100: 1310–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fabrizio JJ, Hime G, Lemmon SK, Bazinet C 1998. Genetic dissection of sperm individualization in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 125: 1833–1843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fan Y, Bergmann A 2010. The cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody is a marker of Caspase-9-like DRONC activity in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ 17: 534–539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feinstein-Rotkopf Y, Arama E 2009. Can't live without them, can live with them: Roles of caspases during vital cellular processes. Apoptosis 14: 980–995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuchs Y, Steller H 2011. Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell 147: 742–758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Geisbrecht ER, Montell DJ 2004. A role for Drosophila IAP1-mediated caspase inhibition in Rac-dependent cell migration. Cell 118: 111–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grether ME, Abrams JM, Agapite J, White K, Steller H 1995. The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev 9: 1694–1708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hay BA, Guo M 2006. Caspase-dependent cell death in Drosophila. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22: 623–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huh JR, Vernooy SY, Yu H, Yan N, Shi Y, Guo M, Hay BA 2004. Multiple apoptotic caspase cascades are required in nonapoptotic roles for Drosophila spermatid individualization. PLoS Biol 2: E15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishizaki Y, Jacobson MD, Raff MC 1998. A role for caspases in lens fiber differentiation. J Cell Biol 140: 153–158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaplan Y, Gibbs-Bar L, Kalifa Y, Feinstein-Rotkopf Y, Arama E 2010. Gradients of a ubiquitin E3 ligase inhibitor and a caspase inhibitor determine differentiation or death in spermatids. Dev Cell 19: 160–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuo CT, Zhu S, Younger S, Jan LY, Jan YN 2006. Identification of E2/E3 ubiquitinating enzymes and caspase activity regulating Drosophila sensory neuron dendrite pruning. Neuron 51: 283–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lippens S, Kockx M, Knaapen M, Mortier L, Polakowska R, Verheyen A, Garmyn M, Zwijsen A, Formstecher P, Huylebroeck D, et al. 2000. Epidermal differentiation does not involve the pro-apoptotic executioner caspases, but is associated with caspase-14 induction and processing. Cell Death Differ 7: 1218–1224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luke-Glaser S, Roy M, Larsen B, Le Bihan T, Metalnikov P, Tyers M, Peter M, Pintard L 2007. CIF-1, a shared subunit of the COP9/signalosome and eukaryotic initiation factor 3 complexes, regulates MEL-26 levels in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Mol Cell Biol 27: 4526–4540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier P, Silke J, Leevers SJ, Evan GI 2000. The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. EMBO J 19: 598–611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rodriguez A, Oliver H, Zou H, Chen P, Wang X, Abrams JM 1999. Dark is a Drosophila homologue of Apaf-1/CED-4 and functions in an evolutionarily conserved death pathway. Nat Cell Biol 1: 272–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rogulja-Ortmann A, Luer K, Seibert J, Rickert C, Technau GM 2007. Programmed cell death in the embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 134: 105–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryoo HD, Baehrecke EH 2010. Distinct death mechanisms in Drosophila development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 889–895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sordet O, Rebe C, Plenchette S, Zermati Y, Hermine O, Vainchenker W, Garrido C, Solary E, Dubrez-Daloz L 2002. Specific involvement of caspases in the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. Blood 100: 4446–4453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Williams DW, Kondo S, Krzyzanowska A, Hiromi Y, Truman JW 2006. Local caspase activity directs engulfment of dendrites during pruning. Nat Neurosci 9: 1234–1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xu D, Li Y, Arcaro M, Lackey M, Bergmann A 2005. The CARD-carrying caspase Dronc is essential for most, but not all, developmental cell death in Drosophila. Development 132: 2125–2134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yuan S, Yu X, Topf M, Dorstyn L, Kumar S, Ludtke SJ, Akey CW 2011. Structure of the Drosophila apoptosome at 6.9 Å resolution. Structure 19: 128–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhou C, Arslan F, Wee S, Krishnan S, Ivanov AR, Oliva A, Leatherwood J, Wolf DA 2005. PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct translation initiation factor 3 complexes. BMC Biol 3: 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Development are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES