There is an error in the information presented in Table 2. The 11th species should not be listed and the information for the 12th and 13th species in columns 4–6 of the table was incorrectly placed on the species directly above. Table 2 is a summary table and the data miss-attributed are correctly displayed in Figure 2.
Table 2.
A summary of subnival zone plant species' abundances, number of significant bacterial clade-associations and model fits.
| Plant species | Average (plants/site) | SD | Positives | Negatives | Avg str cor (r) | Correlation with remote index (r) | Total cor remote upweight | Avg corr rm up | Total cor remote downweight | Avg corr rm down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geum rossii | 8.3 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0.44 | −0.2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.60 |
| Bryophytes | 7.6 | 13.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 |
| Deschampsia caespitosa | 5.7 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0.39 | −0.27 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Trisetum spicatum | 3.9 | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.42 |
| Kobresia myosuroides | 3.5 | 15.3 | 2 | 0 | 0.39 | −0.16 | 1 | 0.05 | 5 | 0.41 |
| Carex nardina | 3.2 | 5.7 | 2 | 1 | 0.31 | −0.25 | 1 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.43 |
| Festuca rubra | 2.9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 4 | 0.42 | 6 | 0.06 |
| Trifolium Nanum | 2.7 | 10.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Senecio fremontii | 2 | 6.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.26 | −0.132 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.43 |
| Silene acaulis | 1.9 | 6.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.34 |
| Elymus scriberneri | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 2 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 |
| Carex phaeocephala | 0.9 | 2.9 | 2 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 3 | 0.40 | 0 | 0 |