1-Introduction
Aging is the primary risk factor for dementia. With increasing life expectancy and the aging populations around the world, dementia is becoming a significant public health problem of the century. The most common pathology underlying dementia in older adults is Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Cerebrovascular disease and Lewy body disease pathologies are other common causes of dementia in the elderly and in many instances AD is also present in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and vascular dementia (VaD). A relatively less common type of dementia is frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), which tends to affect younger individuals compared to other dementia pathologies. The focus of this chapter is potential role of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) in these common dementias.
2- MRS in Alzheimer’s Disease
Initial magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies in Alzheimer’s disease were limited to phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) revealing alterations in membrane phospholopid metabolism 1–4. In 1992, Klunk et al. demonstrated the decrease in the neuronal metabolite N-acetylaspartate (NAA) on proton MRS using perchloric acid extracts from AD brains 4. Soon after, an in vivo MRS study revealed elevated glial metabolite myoinositol to creatine (mI/Cr) levels in patients with AD along with decreased NAA/Cr 5. Further investigations in patients with AD confirmed this finding 6–17 (Figure 1). Many of these early studies also revealed that the increase in mI/Cr and decrease in NAA/Cr in AD was not associated with a change in Cr using absolute quantification methods 10, 11, 14, 18–21. For this reason Cr is commonly used as an internal reference in MRS studies of AD to account for individual and acquisition related variability. There have been conflicting reports on choline (Cho) levels in AD. Some studies found elevated Cho or Cho/Cr levels 8, 9, 12, while others found no changes in Cho or Cho/Cr levels in AD10, 13, 19, 20 . Decreased glutamate plus glutamine levels have been found in a number of studies in AD 22, 23.
Regional alterations of 1H MRS metabolites in patients with AD appear to be wide-spread 8, 24 involving the parietal25, 26, medial and lateral temporal7, 20, 27 and the frontal lobes17, 25. Furthermore, decreases in NAA or NAA/Cr correlate with dementia severity 6, 28,cognitive function 29, 30, behavioral and psychiatric symptoms31, 32 indicating that NAA is a marker for AD severity on various clinical features.
Most of the 1H MRS studies in AD have utilized single voxel 1H MRS. Choice of the single voxel 1H MRS region for detecting and monitoring metabolite levels in AD depends both on the pathophysiology of AD and the technical considerations. The neurofibrillary pathology of AD and associated neuronal loss involves medial temporal lobes earlier and more severely than other regions of the brain. While 1H MRS from the medial temporal lobe or hippocampus yields spectra of reasonable quality using long echo times (TE =130–272 ms), it may be more difficult to achieve MR spectra of consistent quality from the hippocampus using short echo times required for quantification of the mI peak (TE <35 ms) 33, 34. At 4 Tesla using adiabatic selective refocusing for localization and TE of 46 ms it was possible to measure decreased glutamate levels from the hippocampus in AD 35. Another region that is commonly investigated in single voxel MRS studies of AD is the posterior cingulate gyrus voxel. Posterior cingulate gyrus is severely involved with the β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology of AD 36 and 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) studies suggest that the synaptic activity is reduced in this region very early in the disease process such as in cognitively normal carriers of the APOE ε4 allele who are at a higher risk for AD than non-carriers 37, 38. Recently, it was demonstrated that posterior cingulate gyrus is the hub for the resting state connectivity networks on task-free functional MRI, which are affected by AD early in the disease course 39. It is possible to consistently get acceptable quality short-echo time MR spectra from the posterior cingulate gyrus voxel for quantification of mI levels which is critical for longitudinal evaluations and multi-site studies 34.
Human tissue studies in transgenic mouse models of AD have provided some insight into the pathologic underpinnings of decreased NAA, glutamate and increased mI levels, which closely resemble the metabolic abnormalities observed in patients with AD 40–44. For example lower NAA and glutamate levels were associated with Aβ plaque load in mice with PS2APP mutation 44. Magic angle spinning 1H MRS in superior temporal cortex tissue from patients with AD showed a correlation between NAA concentration and neuronal density 41. Recently, an in vivo 13carbon (13C)-MRS and 1H MRS study suggested a link between increased glial or microglial activation and mI elevation in AD 45.
Our investigation of pathologic correlates of MRS metabolite changes in 54 cases with varying degree of AD pathology demonstrated that both NAA/Cr and mI/Cr levels measured antemortem are associated with the pathologic classification of AD severity 46. Whereas mI/Cr ratio was elevated at earlier stages of pathologic involvement (i.e. intermediate likelihood AD), NAA/Cr levels were decreased only at the late stage of pathologic involvement (i.e. high likelihood AD). A combined ratio of the two metabolites as the NAA/mI , however revealed the strongest association with pathologic severity suggesting that both NAA and mI provide complementary information on AD pathology (Figure 2).
Longitudinal MRS studies in patients with AD demonstrate gradually decreasing NAA, NAA/Cr and NAA/mI levels compared to controls 47, 48, 49. The change in NAA and NAA/Cr also correlate with the cognitive decline 48, 50. Although the data is limited, no study has yet reported a longitudinal increase in mI or mI/Cr levels in patients with AD. The reasons may be twofold: 1) Lower reliability of mI quantification compared to NAA 48, 51, 52; 2) Stage of the AD pathologic process. If the elevation of mI is an early event in the pathologic progression of AD, it is possible that a plateau is reached in the mI elevation towards the later stages of the pathologic process, which remains to be investigated.
The applications of MRS as a biomarker for treatment response in clinical trials have been limited to single-site studies. The change in NAA/Cr correlated with the change in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive part (ADAS-cog) scores during a cholinesterase inhibitor treatment trial 53. Short-term or temporary increases in NAA/Cr and Glu/C in cholinesterase inhibitor treated patients versus placebo 54–56, and one trial found no effect on NAA/Cr ratio but found a decrease in Cho/Cr and mI/Cr ratio in the hippocampus albeit in the absence of cognitive response 57. Overall, MRS appears to be a feasible biomarker in single-site clinical trials in AD. Efforts to extend these applications to multi-site clinical trials are underway 33, 51. Larger sample sizes may be needed for MRS compared to structural MRI measurements (e.g. hippocampal volumes) to detect a similar effect size 49. However, effect sizes of a single treatment may differ among imaging markers of different pathophysiological processes. For example a treatment that improves neuronal function may dramatically improve NAA levels but not significantly alter atrophy rates. Therefore effects of the intervention should be considered when comparing imaging markers of different biological sensitivity on sample size and power.
3- MRS in Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB)
Presence of Lewy bodies in substantia nigra is the pathological feature of Parkinson’s disease. Although cortical Lewy bodies can occasionally be detected in Parkinson’s disease, cortical Lewy bodies presenting with dementia is recognized as DLB; a distinct neurodegenerative disease with established clinical and pathologic criteria 58. DLB is frequently accompanied by AD in patients with dementia 59. Lewy body pathology by itself is less common than the mixed (AD and DLB) type60. In our 1H MRS series, patients clinically diagnosed as probable DLB have normal NAA /Cr levels, whereas patients with AD, vascular dementia and frontotemporal dementia have lower NAA /Cr levels than normal, in the posterior cingulate gyri 61. Normal NAA /Cr levels in the posterior cingulate gyri in patients with DLB suggest integrity of neurons in this region which is in keeping with the preserved neuronal numbers found in the in the neocortex of DLB patients at autopsy 60. Normal neocortical NAA or NAA /Cr levels may be useful in distinguishing patients with dementia with Lewy bodies from other dementia syndromes. Reduced NAA/Cr have been detected in the hippocampi of patients with DLB 62, however it is important to note that many patients with DLB may have hippocampal atrophy due to the presence of concomitant neurofibrillary tangle pathology of AD 63 making it hard to determine whether the low NAA/Cr levels in DLB is associated with the co-existent AD pathology. One study found reduced white matter NAA/Cr in patients with DLB compared to the control group suggesting white matter involvement in DLB64. The white matter involvement in DLB was later confirmed by diffusion tensor imaging studies 65, 66.
We found elevated Cho /Cr in the posterior cingulate gyri of patients with DLB (Figure 1). Elevation of Cho in DLB and AD may be the consequence of increased membrane turnover due to dying back of the neuropil. Another explanation however is down regulation of choline acetyltransferase activity which may be responsible for this change in both AD and DLB. Activity of choline acetyltransferase, the enzyme responsible for acetylcholine synthesis from free choline, is reduced earlier and more severely in the disease course of DLB than AD 67. Furthermore, patients with DLB who were treated with cholinesterase inhibitors have shown substantial cognitive improvement 68, revealing the functional significance of acetylcholine deficiency in DLB. The finding that Cho /Cr levels decrease with cholinergic agonist treatment in AD 69 raises the possibility that Cho /Cr levels may be a bio-marker of therapeutic efficacy both in AD and dementia with Lewy bodies drug trials.
4- MRS in Vascular Dementia
Cerebrovascular disease is another common pathology observed in patients with dementia in autopsy series. In most cases however, vascular pathology co-exist with the pathology of AD, and pure vascular pathology is relatively uncommon 70. Vascular lesions are more common in patients with dementia than normal elderly 71. In a patient with the clinical diagnosis of AD and cerebrovascular disease, the challenge is to identify how much if any of the two pathologies are contributing to dementia, so that appropriate therapies can be planned. MRS studies indicate that NAA and NAA /Cr levels are reduced in patients with vascular dementia. White matter NAA /Cr is lower in patients with vascular dementia than in patients with AD, reflecting the white matter ischemic damage in vascular dementia with respect to the cortical degenerative pathology in AD 72, 73. NAA levels are further decreased in patients with stroke who have cognitive impairment compared to those who are cognitively normal even in regions remote from the infarction, suggesting NAA /Cr is a marker for neuronal dysfunction which may extend beyond the region of infarction 74. Cortical mI /Cr levels on the other hand are normal in patients with vascular dementia61, 75, 76 (Figure 1). Because mI /Cr is elevated in patients with AD, mI /Cr may help identify the presence of AD in a demented patient with cerebrovascular disease. Studies that include histopathological confirmation are necessary in order to clarify the role of mI /Cr in differential diagnosis of vascular dementia, mixed dementia (vascular dementia and AD), and AD.
5- MRS in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
MRS metabolite changes in frontotemporal dementia are similar to the changes encountered in AD: lower NAA /Cr and higher mI /Cr than normal 21, 77, 78 (Figure 1). NAA /Cr is lower and mI /Cr is higher levels in the frontal cortex of patients with frontotemporal dementia than patients with early AD, suggesting that regional 1H MRS measurements may help differentiate neurodegenerative disorders that display regionally specific involvement18, 79. It should be noted however that while regional differences may be prominent during early stages of the pathological process in neurodegenerative diseases, these differences may be lost as neurodegenerative pathology involves majority of the cerebral cortex in later stages 61, 77.
Frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) is an autosomal dominant tauopathy that is linked to mutations in the gene encoding for the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) on chromosome 17 80–83. Mutations in MAPT result in filamentous accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau in neurons and glia leading to neurodegeneration and atrophy 84–86. Progressive accumulation of filamentous tau and subsequent neuronal death is central to the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and may begin years before the onset of clinical symptoms. We recently demonstrated 1H MRS metabolite abnormalities in presymptomatic carriers of mutations in the gene encoding for MAPT on chromosome 17. The severity of 1H MRS and MRI abnormalities was associated with the proximity to the estimated age of symptom onset. NAA/mI ratio was fully outside of the control range in presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers who had five years to reach or who were past the estimated age of symptom onset, indicating presence of 1H MRS metabolite abnormalities related to neurodegeneration, years before the onset of symptoms and atrophy in MAPT mutation carriers (Figure 3).
6- MRS in Mild Cognitive Impairment and other Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Groups
There are no proven treatments for AD pathology, however current efforts to arrest or slow disease progression generate the prospect for preventive interventions 87. There is considerable interest in early diagnosis by identifying individuals with cognitive difficulties who eventually progress to dementia, from those who are aging with normal cognitive function 88. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was established on clinical grounds in order to identify symptomatic individuals who do not meet the criteria for dementia 89. A majority of people with MCI develops dementia in the future.
The progression of AD pathophysiological processes start decades before the clinical diagnosis of AD and the earliest cognitive impairments occur in the memory domain 90. The syndrome of amnestic MCI represents this prodromal phase in the progression of AD 89. More recently, the construct of MCI has been broadened to include individuals with impairments in non-amnestic cognitive domains such as attention/executive, language or visual-spatial processing domains 91. The clinical presentation of this broadened definition of MCI is heterogeneous. Both the amnestic and non-amnestic subtypes of MCI may present with involvement of a single cognitive domain or multiple cognitive domains. It is clear from several independent studies that most people with the amnestic form of MCI who progress to dementia in the future, develop AD92–98. People with non-amnestic MCI on average have more vascular comorbidity and infarctions as well as a higher prevalence of extra pyramidal features, mood disorders, and behavioral symptoms than people with amnestic MCI 99, 100. The etiology of MCI is also heterogeneous. A variety of early stage dementia-associated pathophysiological processes such as AD, cerebrovascular disease and Lewy body pathology have been identified in patients with MCI at autopsy 101, 102, 103, 104. Many of these pathologies co-exist in MCI 103 and require different therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, all patients with MCI do not develop dementia at a similar rate 105, 106. The heterogeneity of MCI warrants development of non-invasive biomarkers that can predict the rate of future progression to different dementias, for early diagnosis and treatment with potential disease-specific preventive interventions.
Early 1H MRS studies in MCI included individuals who had impairments in memory function (i.e. amnestic MCI) 8, 29, 107, 108. A majority of patients with amnestic MCI develop AD in the future, and many of these individuals have early AD pathology 95. In keeping with this, the 1H MRS findings in amnestic MCI are similar to but milder than the findings in AD 8, 29, 108. However there are distinct group wise differences in MRI and 1H MRS findings between amnestic MCI and non-amnestic MCI subtypes. Patients with amnestic MCI tend to have smaller hippocampal volumes and elevated mI/Cr ratios compared to patients with non-amnestic MCI and cognitively normal controls. On the other hand, non-amnestic MCI patients have normal hippocampal volumes and normal mI/Cr ratios, but a greater proportion of these patients have cortical infarctions compared to the amnestic MCI patients 99. Both hippocampal atrophy and elevated mI/Cr are sensitive markers of early AD pathology, and the severity of these abnormalities correlate with the pathologic severity of AD 46, 109–114. For this reason, hippocampal atrophy and elevated mI/Cr most likely represent a higher frequency of early AD pathology in patients with amnestic MCI compared to non-amnestic MCI. On the contrary, normal hippocampal volumes and mI/Cr ratios in the non-amnestic MCI subtype suggest that other pathologies in addition to AD underlie non-amnestic MCI. Higher prevalence of cortical infarctions on MRI, history of TIA and stroke in non-amnestic MCI patients suggest that cerebrovascular disease is one of the pathological contributors to nonamnestic MCI.
The pathologic and clinical heterogeneity of MCI require multimodality imaging markers that are sensitive to the various dementia related pathophysiological processes for early diagnosis in patients with MCI. The most common dementia-related pathologies observed in MCI include AD, cerebrovascular disease and DLB 102–104. Lesions that are associated with cerebrovascular disease on MRI include infarctions and white matter hyperintensities on T2 weighted images. These cerebrovascular lesions are more common in patients with MCI compared to cognitively normal older adults 99. An MR marker that is highly sensitive to the pathophysiological processes of AD specifically the neurofibrillary tangle pathology-associated neurodegeneration early in the disease course is hippocampal atrophy 112, 114. Both the presence of cortical infarctions 115 and hippocampal atrophy 116 are predictors of dementia risk in MCI.
There is evidence that 1H MRS is sensitive to the pathophysiological processes associated with the risk of dementia in patients with MCI 117, 118. Decreased NAA/Cr ratio in the posterior cingulate gyrus voxel is associated with an increased risk of dementia in patients with MCI 115. Furthermore, posterior cingulate gyrus voxel NAA/Cr levels decline over time in patients with MCI who progress to AD diagnosis 48. 1H MRS is complementary in predicting future progression to dementia in MCI when considered with other strong predictors of dementia risk in MCI such as hippocampal volumes and cortical infarctions. Decreased posterior cingulate gyrus NAA/Cr increases the risk of progression to dementia in MCI patients with hippocampal atrophy and the risk of dementia increases even further if cortical infarctions are present in a patient with MCI 115 (Figure 4). The complementary role of multimodality imaging markers in predicting the risk of dementia in MCI is consistent with cross-sectional studies showing the added value of 1H MRS and hippocampal volumes for discriminating cognitively impaired but non-demented individuals from cognitively normal subjects 108 and distinguishing AD patients from cognitively normal119. Furthermore, hippocampal volumes and NAA/Cr levels are independent and complementary predictors of verbal memory on neuropsychometric testing in nondemented older adults, demonstrating that verbal memory depends on both structural and metabolic integrity of the hippocampus 120.
Recently, the diagnostic criteria for AD and MCI were revised by two separate workgroups charged by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association 121–123. A third work group was charged to define the preclinical stage of AD in light of the evidence that the pathophysiological process of AD begin decades before the diagnosis of clinical dementia 90. The change in most well validated imaging biomarkers have been hypothetically modeled for the three clinical stages of AD (i.e. preclinical AD, MCI and AD). According to this hypothetical model, the accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology imaged with PET amyloid ligands or measured with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ-42 levels precede the change in imaging markers of neurodegeneration associated with the neurofibrillary tangle pathology of AD such as hippocampal atrophy on MRI 124. The model that emerged from evidence on well validated imaging biomarkers will be critical for tracking disease progression and for assessment of primary and secondary preventive interventions in individuals at the preclinical and MCI stage of AD.
Several well validated imaging biomarkers exist for various pathologic features of the early AD pathology such as increased Aβ load on PET, atrophy on structural MRI or glucose metabolic reductions on PET. However there are other features of AD pathology for which a well-validated biomarker does not exist. For example there is no widely accepted biomarker for glial or microglial activation. The glial metabolite mI quantified with 1H MRS may potentially be useful as a biomarker for glial activation in neurodegenerative diseases including AD.
Cross-sectional studies indicate that mI/Cr is elevated in MCI and mild AD even in the absence of a decrease in NAA/Cr 6, 8, 107. Our data in a pathology-confirmed sample of older adults with a range of AD pathology further showed that the mI/Cr elevation is associated with intermediate likelihood (i.e. an earlier stage) AD pathology whereas the decrease in NAA/Cr is associated with higher likelihood (i.e. a later stage) AD pathology 46 (Figure 2). Furthermore, mI/ Cr levels increase in the pre-dementia phase of Down’s syndrome15, 125 and in pre-symptomatic individuals with familial dementia 126, 127 even in the absence of structural MRI and NAA/Cr changes127. The mI peak consists of glial metabolites that are responsible for osmoregulation 128, 129. MI levels correlate with glial proliferation in inflammatory CNS demyelination 130. Because the dense cored amyloid deposits in AD are surrounded by clusters of microglia and astrocytes 131, it is thought that the elevation of the mI peak is related to glial proliferation and microglial activation in AD 45, 132. A significant correlation between mI/Cr levels and amyloid load measured with Pittsburgh Compound-B PET imaging was found in a population-based sample of 311 cognitively normal older adults 133 (Figure 5). It is possible that the mI/Cr levels are associated with the microglial and glial activation that surround the senile amyloid plaques. However, a 1H MRS - histology correlation study in a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 found elevated mI/Cr levels even in the absence of gliosis 134. Based on limited evidence, it is not be possible to attribute elevation in mI solely to glial activation in neurodegenerative diseases. Although there is evidence that mI/Cr elevation is an early marker in sporadic AD, familial AD and FTLD even before cognitive impairment, loss of neuronal integrity and atrophy, histological confirmation is needed to better understand the pathologic basis of mI/Cr elevation in MCI.
MCI is a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous disorder. MRS may potentially provide information on the underlying pathologies in patients with MCI that is not available from other imaging biomarkers. Data from cognitively normal older adults and cognitively normal adults at risk for familial dementia suggest that MRS may be useful as a biomarker for preclinical pathological processes and potentially assessing the response to preventive interventions.
7- Future Perspectives
Although significant progress has been made on improving the acquisition and analysis techniques in 1H MRS, translation of these technical developments to clinical practice have not been effective. The main reasons for ineffective translation of technology to clinical practice or patient-oriented research are two fold: 1) Lack of standardization for multi-site applications and normative data 2) Insufficient understanding the pathologic basis of 1H MRS metabolite changes. Advances on these grounds would further increase the impact of 1H MRS as biomarker for the early pathological involvement in neurodegenerative diseases and in turn increase the use 1H MRS in clinical practice.
Key points.
Neurodegenerative dementias are characterized by elevated myoinositol and decreased N-acetylaspartate levels
The increase in myoinositol appear to precede decreasing N-acetylaspartate levels in neurodegenerative diseases
N-acetyl aspartate to myoinositol ratio in the posterior cingulate gyri decrease with increasing burden of Alzheimer’s disease pathology
1H MRS is sensitive to the pathophysiological processes associated with the risk of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment
Although significant progress has been made on improving the acquisition and analysis techniques in 1H MRS, translation of these technical developments to clinical practice have not been effective due to lack of standardization for multisite applications and normative data as well as insufficient understanding the pathologic basis of 1H MRS metabolite changes.
Acknowledgments
Grant Support: Dr. Kantarci’s research program is supported by the NIH: R01 AG40042, P50 AG16574/Project1 and R21 NS066147.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Brown GG, Levine SR, Gorell JM, et al. In vivo 31P NMR profiles of Alzheimer's disease and multiple subcortical infarct dementia. Neurology. 1989;39(11):1423–1427. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.11.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pettegrew JW, Moossy J, Withers G, et al. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study of the brain in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1988;47(3):235–248. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198805000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pettegrew JW, Panchalingam K, Moossy J, et al. Correlation of phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and morphologic findings in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(10):1093–1096. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520340047010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klunk WE, Panchalingam K, Moossy J, et al. N-acetyl-L-aspartate and other amino acid metabolites in Alzheimer's disease brain: a preliminary proton nuclear magnetic resonance study. Neurology. 1992;42(8):1578–1585. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.8.1578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miller BL, Moats RA, Shonk T, et al. Alzheimer disease: depiction of increased cerebral myo-inositol with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1993;18(7)(2):433–437. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang W, Alexander GE, Chang L, et al. Brain metabolite concentration and dementia severity in Alzheimer's disease: a (1)H MRS study. Neurology. 2001;57(4):626–632. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jessen F, Block W, Traber F, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy detects a relative decrease of N-acetylaspartate in the medial temporal lobe of patients with AD. Neurology. 2000;55(5):684–688. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.5.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kantarci K, Jack CR, Jr, Xu YC, et al. Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A 1H MRS study. Neurology. 2000;55(2):210–217. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.2.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meyerhoff DJ, MacKay S, Constans JM, et al. Axonal injury and membrane alterations in Alzheimer's disease suggested by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(1):40–47. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moats RA, Ernst T, Shonk TK, et al. Abnormal cerebral metabolite concentrations in patients with probable Alzheimer disease. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1994;32(1):110–115. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mohanakrishnan P, Fowler AH, Vonsattel JP, et al. Regional metabolic alterations in Alzheimer's disease: an in vitro 1H NMR study of the hippocampus and cerebellum. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. 1997;52(2):B111–B117. doi: 10.1093/gerona/52a.2.b111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pfefferbaum A, Adalsteinsson E, Spielman D, et al. In vivo spectroscopic quantification of the N-acetyl moiety, creatine, and choline from large volumes of brain gray and white matter: effects of normal aging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999;41(2):276–284. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199902)41:2<276::aid-mrm10>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rose SE, de Zubicaray GI, Wang D, et al. A 1H MRS study of probable Alzheimer's disease and normal aging: implications for longitudinal monitoring of dementia progression. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17(2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schuff N, Capizzano AA, Du AT, et al. Selective reduction of N-acetylaspartate in medial temporal and parietal lobes in AD. Neurology. 2002;58(6):928–935. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.6.928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shonk T, Ross BD. Role of increased cerebral myo-inositol in the dementia of Down syndrome. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1995;33(6):858–861. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rai GS, McConnell JR, Waldman A, et al. Brain proton spectroscopy in dementia: an aid to clinical diagnosis. Lancet. 1999;353(9158):1063–1064. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03759-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christiansen P, Toft P, Larsson HB, et al. The concentration of N-acetyl aspartate, creatine + phosphocreatine, and choline in different parts of the brain in adulthood and senium. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(6):799–806. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90197-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ernst T, Chang L, Melchor R, et al. Frontotemporal dementia and early Alzheimer disease: differentiation with frontal lobe H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1997;203(3):829–836. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parnetti L, Tarducci R, Presciutti O, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy can differentiate Alzheimer's disease from normal aging. Mechanisms of Ageing & Development. 1997;97(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(97)01877-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schuff N, Amend D, Ezekiel F, et al. Changes of hippocampal N-acetyl aspartate and volume in Alzheimer's disease. A proton MR spectroscopic imaging and MRI study. Neurology. 1997;49(6):1513–1521. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.6.1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shonk TK, Moats RA, Gifford P, et al. Probable Alzheimer disease: diagnosis with proton MR spectroscopy.[see comment] Radiology. 1995;195(1):65–72. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Antuono PG, Jones JL, Wang Y, et al. Decreased glutamate + glutamine in Alzheimer's disease detected in vivo with (1)H-MRS at 0.5 T. Neurology. 2001;56(6):737–742. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.6.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hattori N, Abe K, Sakoda S, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic study at 3 Tesla on glutamate/glutamine in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport. 2002;13(1):183–186. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200201210-00041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tedeschi G, Bertolino A, Lundbom N, et al. Cortical and subcortical chemical pathology in Alzheimer's disease as assessed by multislice proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Neurology. 1996;47(3):696–704. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.3.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schuff N, Amend DL, Meyerhoff DJ, et al. Alzheimer disease: quantitative H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of frontoparietal brain. Radiology. 1998;207(1):91–102. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu X, Schuff N, Kornak J, et al. Effects of Alzheimer disease on fronto-parietal brain N-acetyl aspartate and myo-inositol using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20(2):77–85. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000213809.12553.fc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frederick BB, Satlin A, Yurgelun-Todd DA, et al. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of Alzheimer's disease in the parietal and temporal lobes. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;42(2):147–150. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00242-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kwo-On-Yuen PF, Newmark RD, Budinger TF, et al. Brain N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid in Alzheimer's disease: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Brain Res. 1994;667(2):167–174. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91494-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chantal S, Braun CM, Bouchard RW, et al. Similar 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic metabolic pattern in the medial temporal lobes of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Brain Res. 2004;1003(1–2):26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.11.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kantarci K, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, et al. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, cognitive function, and apolipoprotein E genotype in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(7):934–942. doi: 10.1017/s1355617702870084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sweet RA, Panchalingam K, Pettegrew JW, et al. Psychosis in Alzheimer disease: postmortem magnetic resonance spectroscopy evidence of excess neuronal and membrane phospholipid pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(4):547–553. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shinno H, Inagaki T, Miyaoka T, et al. A decrease in N-acetylaspartate and an increase in myoinositol in the anterior cingulate gyrus are associated with behavioral and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2007;260(1–2):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jessen F, Gur O, Block W, et al. A multicenter (1)H-MRS study of the medial temporal lobe in AD and MCI. Neurology. 2009;72(20):1735–1740. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a60a20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kantarci K, Reynolds G, Petersen RC, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: comparison of 1.5 and 3 T . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(5):843–849. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rupsingh R, Borrie M, Smith M, et al. Reduced hippocampal glutamate in Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(5):802–810. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica. 1991;82(4):239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Minoshima S. Imaging Alzheimer's disease: clinical applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003;13(4):769–780. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(03)00099-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reiman EM, Caselli RJ, Yun LS, et al. Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer's disease in persons homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele for apolipoprotein E.[see comment] New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(12):752–758. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603213341202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen SQ, Wang PJ, Ten GJ, et al. Role of myo-inositol by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(6):558–566. doi: 10.1159/000261646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cheng LL, Newell K, Mallory AE, et al. Quantification of neurons in Alzheimer and control brains with ex vivo high resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and stereology. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;20(7):527–533. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00512-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dedeoglu A, Choi JK, Cormier K, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of Alzheimer's disease mouse brain that express mutant human APP shows altered neurochemical profile. Brain Res. 2004;1012(1–2):60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.02.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Marjanska M, Curran GL, Wengenack TM, et al. Monitoring disease progression in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(33):11906–11910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505513102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.von Kienlin M, Kunnecke B, Metzger F, et al. Altered metabolic profile in the frontal cortex of PS2APP transgenic mice, monitored throughout their life span. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;18(1):32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sailasuta N, Harris K, Tran T, et al. Minimally invasive biomarker confirms glial activation present in Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:495–499. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S23721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kantarci K, Knopman DS, Dickson DW, et al. Alzheimer disease: postmortem neuropathologic correlates of antemortem 1H MR spectroscopy metabolite measurements. Radiology. 2008;248(1):210–220. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Adalsteinsson E, Sullivan EV, Kleinhans N, et al. Longitudinal decline of the neuronal marker N-acetyl aspartate in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2000;355(9216):1696–1697. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02246-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kantarci K, Weigand SD, Petersen RC, et al. Longitudinal 1H MRS changes in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28(9):1330–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schott JM, Frost C, MacManus DG, et al. Short echo time proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal multiple time point study. Brain. 2010;133(11):3315–3322. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jessen F, Block W, Traber F, et al. Decrease of N-acetylaspartate in the MTL correlates with cognitive decline of AD patients. Neurology. 2001;57(5):930–932. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.5.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Traber F, Block W, Freymann N, et al. A multicenter reproducibility study of single-voxel 1H-MRS of the medial temporal lobe. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(5):1096–1103. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0108-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Okada T, Sakamoto S, Nakamoto Y, et al. Reproducibility of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in correlation with signal-to-noise ratio. Psychiatry Res. 2007;156(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Modrego PJ, Fayed N, Errea JM, et al. Memantine versus donepezil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized trial with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(3):405–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Krishnan KR, Charles HC, Doraiswamy PM, et al. Randomized, placebocontrolled trial of the effects of donepezil on neuronal markers and hippocampal volumes in Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;160(11):2003–2011. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Modrego PJ, Pina MA, Fayed N, et al. Changes in metabolite ratios after treatment with rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease: a nonrandomised controlled trial with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(10):867–877. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620100-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Penner J, Rupsingh R, Smith M, et al. Increased glutamate in the hippocampus after galantamine treatment for Alzheimer disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010;34(1):104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bartha R, Smith M, Rupsingh R, et al. High field (1)H MRS of the hippocampus after donepezil treatment in Alzheimer disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32(3):786–793. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65(12):1863–1872. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hamilton RL. Lewy bodies in Alzheimer's disease: a neuropathological review of 145 cases using alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry. Brain Pathol. 2000;10(3):378–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2000.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gomez-Isla T, Growdon WB, McNamara M, et al. Clinicopathologic correlates in temporal cortex in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 1999;53(9):2003–2009. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kantarci K, Petersen RC, Boeve BF, et al. 1H MR spectroscopy in common dementias. Neurology. 2004;63(8):1393–1398. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000141849.21256.ac. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xuan X, Ding M, Gong X. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy detects a relative decrease of N-acetylaspartate in the hippocampus of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neuroimaging. 2008;18(2):137–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kantarci K, Ferman TJ, Boeve BF, et al. Focal Atrophy on MRI and Neuropathologic Classification of Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Neurology. 2012 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826357a5. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Molina JA, Garcia-Segura JM, Benito-Leon J, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dementia with Lewy bodies. European Neurology. 2002;48(3):158–163. doi: 10.1159/000065520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Firbank MJ, Blamire AM, Krishnan MS, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Res. 2007;155(2):135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kantarci K, Avula R, Senjem ML, et al. Dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease: neurodegenerative patterns characterized by DTI. Neurology. 2010;74(22):1814–1821. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e0f7cf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Alford M, et al. Early and widespread cholinergic losses differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer disease. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2002;59(10):946–951. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McKeith IG, Grace JB, Walker Z, et al. Rivastigmine in the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies: preliminary findings from an open trial. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2000;15(5):387–392. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(200005)15:5<387::aid-gps131>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Satlin A, Bodick N, Offen WW, et al. Brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in Alzheimer's disease: changes after treatment with xanomeline, an M1 selective cholinergic agonist. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1997;154(10):1459–1461. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.10.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Holmes C, Cairns N, Lantos P, et al. Validity of current clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies.[see comment] British Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;174:45–50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.174.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, et al. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology. 2007;69(24):2197–2204. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271090.28148.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kattapong VJ, Brooks WM, Wesley MH, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of vascular- and Alzheimer-type dementia. Archives of Neurology. 1996;53(7):678–680. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550070116019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.MacKay S, Meyerhoff DJ, Constans JM, et al. Regional gray and white matter metabolite differences in subjects with AD with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia, and elderly controls with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Archives of Neurology. 1996;53(2):167–174. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550020079018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ross AJ, Sachdev PS, Wen W, et al. 1H MRS in stroke patients with and without cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(6):873–882. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Waldman AD, Rai GS, McConnell JR, et al. Clinical brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for management of Alzheimer's and sub-cortical ischemic vascular dementia in older people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;35(2):137–142. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(02)00014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shiino A, Watanabe T, Shirakashi Y, et al. The profile of hippocampal metabolites differs between Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Garrard P, Schott JM, MacManus DG, et al. Posterior cingulate neurometabolite profiles and clinical phenotype in frontotemporal dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19(4):185–189. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000213915.72395.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kantarci K. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dementia. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(Spec No 2):S146–S152. doi: 10.1259/bjr/60346217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mihara M, Hattori N, Abe K, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic study of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia/Pick complex. Neuroreport. 2006;17(4):413–416. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203353.52622.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Boeve BF, Hutton M. Refining frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: introducing FTDP-17 (MAPT) and FTDP-17 (PGRN) Arch Neurol. 2008;65(4):460–464. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.4.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5'-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature. 1998;393(6686):702–705. doi: 10.1038/31508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rademakers R, Cruts M, van Broeckhoven C. The role of tau (MAPT) in frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies. Hum Mutat. 2004;24(4):277–295. doi: 10.1002/humu.20086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Foster NL, Wilhelmsen K, Sima AA, et al. Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: a consensus conference. Conference Participants. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(6):706–715. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ingram DA, Wenning MJ, Shannon K, et al. Leukemic potential of doubly mutant Nf1 and Wv hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2003;101(5):1984–1986. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Whitwell JL, Jack CR, Jr, Boeve BF, et al. Voxel-based morphometry patterns of atrophy in FTLD with mutations in MAPT or PGRN. Neurology. 2009;72(9):813–820. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000343851.46573.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bunker JM, Kamath K, Wilson L, et al. FTDP-17 mutations compromise the ability of tau to regulate microtubule dynamics in cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(17):11856–11863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509420200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sperling RA, Jack CR, Jr, Aisen PS. Testing the right target and right drug at the right stage. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(111) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002609. 111cm133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Thal LJ, Kantarci K, Reiman EM, et al. The role of biomarkers in clinical trials for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20(1):6–15. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000191420.61260.a8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology. 2001;58(12):1985–1992. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2004;256(3):183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, et al. Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons. Neurology. 2002;59(2):198–205. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bowen J, Teri L, Kukull W, et al. Progression to dementia in patients with isolated memory loss. Lancet. 1997;349(9054):763–765. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08256-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Flicker C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B. Mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: predictors of dementia. Neurology. 1991;41(7):1006–1009. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.7.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jicha GA, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, et al. Neuropathologic outcome of mild cognitive impairment following progression to clinical dementia. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(5):674–681. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.5.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Meyer JS, Xu G, Thornby J, et al. Is mild cognitive impairment prodromal for vascular dementia like Alzheimer's disease? Stroke. 2002;33(8):1981–1985. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000024432.34557.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease.[see comment] Archives of Neurology. 2001;58(3):397–405. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.[erratum appears in Arch Neurol 1999 Jun;56(6)760] Archives of Neurology. 1999;56(3):303–308. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kantarci K, Petersen RC, Przybelski SA, et al. Hippocampal volumes, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolites, and cerebrovascular disease in mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(12):1621–1628. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mariani E, Monastero R, Ercolani S, et al. Vascular Risk Factors in Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes. Findings from the ReGAl Project. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24(6):448–456. doi: 10.1159/000110653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, et al. Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions. Neurology. 2005;64(5):834–841. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152982.47274.9E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, et al. Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(5):665–672. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.5.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, et al. The neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2009;66(2):200–208. doi: 10.1002/ana.21706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Molano J, Boeve B, Ferman T, et al. Mild cognitive impairment associated with limbic and neocortical Lewy body disease: a clinicopathological study. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 2):540–556. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Busse A, Hensel A, Guhne U, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes. Neurology. 2006;67(12):2176–2185. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fischer P, Jungwirth S, Zehetmayer S, et al. Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia. Neurology. 2007;68(4):288–291. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Catani M, Cherubini A, Howard R, et al. (1)H-MR spectroscopy differentiates mild cognitive impairment from normal brain aging. Neuroreport. 2001;12(11):2315–2317. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chao LL, Schuff N, Kramer JH, et al. Reduced medial temporal lobe N-acetylaspartate in cognitively impaired but nondemented patients. Neurology. 2005;64(2):282–289. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149638.45635.FF. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Barkhof F, Polvikoski TM, van Straaten EC, et al. The significance of medial temporal lobe atrophy: a postmortem MRI study in the very old. Neurology. 2007;69(15):1521–1527. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277459.83543.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bobinski M, Wegiel J, Tarnawski M, et al. Relationships between regional neuronal loss and neurofibrillary changes in the hippocampal formation and duration and severity of Alzheimer disease. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 1997;56(4):414–420. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199704000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Gosche KM, Mortimer JA, Smith CD, et al. Hippocampal volume as an index of Alzheimer neuropathology: findings from the Nun Study. Neurology. 2002;58(10):1476–1482. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.10.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Jack CR, Jr, Dickson DW, Parisi JE, et al. Antemortem MRI findings correlate with hippocampal neuropathology in typical aging and dementia. Neurology. 2002;58(5):750–757. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.5.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Zarow C, Vinters HV, Ellis WG, et al. Correlates of hippocampal neuron number in Alzheimer's disease and ischemic vascular dementia. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(6):896–903. doi: 10.1002/ana.20503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Jagust WJ, Zheng L, Harvey DJ, et al. Neuropathological basis of magnetic resonance images in aging and dementia. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(1):72–80. doi: 10.1002/ana.21296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kantarci K, Weigand SD, Przybelski SA, et al. Risk of dementia in MCI: combined effect of cerebrovascular disease, volumetric MRI, and 1H MRS. Neurology. 2009;72(17):1519–1525. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a2e864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Jack CR, Jr, Petersen RC, Xu YC, et al. Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 1999;52(7):1397–1403. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.7.1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Martinez-Bisbal MC, Arana E, Marti-Bonmati L, et al. Cognitive impairment: classification by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11(3):187–193. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Metastasio A, Rinaldi P, Tarducci R, et al. Conversion of MCI to dementia: Role of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27(7):926–932. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Westman E, Wahlund LO, Foy C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for detection of early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(Suppl 3):307–319. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zimmerman ME, Pan JW, Hetherington HP, et al. Hippocampal neurochemistry, neuromorphometry, and verbal memory in nondemented older adults. Neurology. 2008;70(18):1594–1600. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306314.77311.be. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Jack CR, Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Jack CR, Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119–128. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Huang W, Alexander GE, Daly EM, et al. High brain myo-inositol levels in the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down's syndrome: a 1H MRS study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(12):1879–1886. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Godbolt AK, Waldman AD, MacManus DG, et al. MRS shows abnormalities before symptoms in familial Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;66(5):718–722. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201237.05869.df. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Kantarci K, Boeve BF, Wszolek ZK, et al. MRS in presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers: a potential biomarker for tau-mediated pathology. Neurology. 2010;75(9):771–778. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f073c7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Brand A, Richter-Landsberg C, Leibfritz D. Multinuclear NMR studies on the energy metabolism of glial and neuronal cells. Developmental Neuroscience. 1993;15(3–5):289–298. doi: 10.1159/000111347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Urenjak J, Williams SR, Gadian DG, et al. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy unambiguously identifies different neural cell types. Journal of Neuroscience. 1993;13(3):981–989. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-00981.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Bitsch A, Bruhn H, Vougioukas V, et al. Inflammatory CNS demyelination: histopathologic correlation with in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1999;20(9):1619–1627. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Dickson DW. The pathogenesis of senile plaques. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56(4):321–339. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199704000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ross BD, Bluml S, Cowan R, et al. In vivo MR spectroscopy of human dementia. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1998;8(4):809–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kantarci K, Lowe V, Przybelski SA, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, beta-amyloid load, and cognition in a population-based sample of cognitively normal older adults. Neurology. 2011;77(10):951–958. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822dc7e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Oz G, Nelson CD, Koski DM, et al. Noninvasive detection of presymptomatic and progressive neurodegeneration in a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. J Neurosci. 2010;30(10):3831–3838. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5612-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]