Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Org Biomol Chem. 2012 Nov 21;10(43):8654–8659. doi: 10.1039/c2ob26529j

1,8-Naphthyridine-2,7-diamine: A Potential Universal Reader of the Watson-Crick Base Pairs for DNA Sequencing by Electron Tunneling

Feng Liang a, Stuart Lindsay a,*, Peiming Zhang a,*
PMCID: PMC3748945  NIHMSID: NIHMS480331  PMID: 23038027

Abstract

With the aid of Density Functional Theory (DFT), we designed 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine as a recognition molecule to read the DNA base pairs for genomic sequencing by electron tunneling. NMR studies show that it can form stable triplets with both A:T and G:C base pairs through hydrogen bonding. Our results suggest that the naphthyridine molecule should be able to function as a universal base pair reader in a tunneling gap, generating distinguishable signatures under electrical bias for each of DNA base pairs.

Introduction

Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized many aspects of biological sciecne, ranging from human disease analyses 13,4,5 to drug discovery 6 to enviromental monitoring.7 Today, sequencing a human genome can be completed in a week and with several thousand dollars. Despite these great advances, the NGS technologies are limited by their notorious short read length and low accuracy in comparison to the conventional Sanger sequencing.8, 9 In addition, the NGS sequencers rely on delicate biochemical reagents for sequencing reactions and require sophisticated optical instruments for signal readouts (besides the Ion PGMTM from Life Technologies which electronically measures protons10). All of these can be roadblocks in further reducing the cost for their use in clinics. In parallel with NGS, nanopore-based devices have being developed as a disruptive platform to sequence single DNA molecules electronically, reagent-freely, with long read lengths.11, 12 Although steady progress has been made,13, 14 the nanopore sequencing has yet to achieve a single base resolution. To address this issue, we have recently demonstrated that a STM tip functionalized with benzamide can sense individual DNA bases in a short oligonucleotide on a gold substrate funtionalized with a benzamide monolayer.15 This sub-nanometer spatial resolution opens a door to sequencing DNA by electron tunneling. In order to sequence single DNA molecules with high accuracy, we devised a recognition scheme in a tunneling gap that is incorporated into a nanopore, as shown in Figure 1. When single stranded DNA translocates through the nanopore, each of its bases is sequentially trapped in a tunneling gap by forming a triplet complex with two electrodes that are functionalized with a base reader and a base pair reader respectively. The complicated recognition system in a nanogap is challenging to construct. However, we were able to demonstrate that the naturally occurring nucleosides can be recognized by nucleobases in the tunneling nanogap following the Watson-Crick base pairing rule.16 In this present study, we have identified a naphthyridine molecule that can interact with both Watson-Crick base pairs through hydrogen bonding, laying down the foundation for us to investigate triplexation through electron tunneling.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A concept of DNA sequencing by trans-base tunneling. The nanoelectrodes can be embedded in or laid on a nanopore using semiconductor nanotechnologies

Results and Discussion

We chose 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine (designated as N) as a candidate to read the base pairs. There are varied structures that have been investigated as motifs of triplex forming oligonucleotides (TFO) to recognize the Watson-Crick base pairs in the double stranded DNA.17 Two typical examples are shown in Figure 2a, which exhibit fair affinity and selectivity to the DNA base pairs when incorporated into TFO.18, 19 One common feature of these structures is that they are configured either by connecting two aromatic rings together through a free rotating sigma bond or by modifying the DNA base with a functional tail to match the hydrogen bonding patterns of the Watson-Crick base pairs on the major groove side. However, such flexibility results in a loss of entropy when a hydrogen bonded complex is formed because the freely rotating bonds become fixed. This would not be suitable for our recognition scheme in which the hydrogen bonding may be a dominating force for formation of a stable triplet and the important base stacking interactions may be not as effective as that in the double stranded DNA anymore. We postulate that a rigid and planar scaffold with the right geometry will have an advantage in this regard. Furthermore, if a tandem hydrogen bonding site array is constructed along one edge of the scaffold without any C–H interruption, it should increase the hydrogen bonding cooperativity. 1,8-Naphthyridine-2,7-diamine is a molecule that contains an aromatic plane composed of two fused pyridyl rings and two amines aligned with the ring nitrogen atoms to form an array of four hydrogen bonding sites (see Figure 1). It has been exploited as a moiety to create new base pairs in DNA.20, 21 In addition, the amine derivatives of naphthyridine form stable complexes with guanine 22, 23 and deaza guanine,24 and used as a fluorescnet dye to stain nucleoli in the nucleus of MDCK-cells.25 However, the interactions of 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine with the DNA base pairs have not been explored. With the aid of Density Functional Theory (DFT), we first scrutinized the structural fitness through computer modeling. As illustrated in Figure 2b, 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine can form hydrogen bonded complexes of N-T:A and N-C:G with the Watson-Crick base pairs from the major groove sides. In the computer simulation, a methyl group was placed at the 3-position of N as a prospective site for attachment, and all the sugars connected to DNA bases were substituted with methyl groups in order to reduce the computing time. Note that the methyl substitution would not exert a game changing influence on our computing results since the hydrogen bonding interactions take place on the opposite sides of the sugars. The DFT calculations show that there is a gain of ~ 15 kcal/mol in energy when N hydrogen-bonds to either T:A or C:G base pairs in vacuum, which is slightly higher than the hydrogen-bonding energy of the T:A Watson-Crick base pair (Table S1 in Supporting Information). The distance between two amino nitrogen atoms (~ 6.86 Å) of N is fairly matched to that from N-7 of adenine to O-4 of thymine (~ 6.26 Å) in the T:A base pair, resulting in formation of a well fit N-T:A triplet. In the N-C:G triplet, N is twisted out of the C:G base pair plane due to a steric hindrance between the 2-position amine of N and the 5-position hydrogen of cytosine. The DFT solvation calculation indicates that the triplets are slightly less stable in DMSO, a solvent that has a dielectric constant (ε = 46.7 D) comparable to one in the major groove of DNA (ε = 55 D).26 We believe that the hydrogen bonding interactions should prevail in the nanogap that has a local environment less hydrophilic than the bulk aqueous solution especially when it is functionalized with organic molecules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) DNA base pair recognition molecules for TFO and their hydrogen bonding interactions with DNA base pairs; (b) DFT models of the complexes of 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine with the T:A and C:G base pairs.

Following the computer modeling studies, we investigated the hydrogen bonding interactions of N with the DNA base pairs formed by individual nucleosides in solutions using different NMR techniques. To adequately dissolve these moieties into chloroform (a commonly used solvent for the hydrogen bonding studies), N was converted to an amine-acetylated derivative (Nac), and hydroxyl groups of the naturally occurring nucleosides were silylated with tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (designated as dA, dC, dG, dT, and dU). Our primary focus was on hydrogen bonding of Nac with the A:T base pair because the computer modeling showed a good fit between these two entities. First, an NMR spectrum of a mixture of dA and dT in deuterated chloroform (in a 1:1 molar ratio) was recorded to confirm the base pairing (upper spectrum in Figure 3a). It shows that the imino proton peak of dT has not only shifted downfield but also split into two with an integration ratio of 1:2, compared to that (δH = 9.8 ppm) in a dT only solution. This indicates that there were two different hydrogen-bonding interactions involved between dA and dT. By means of 1H-1H NOESY NMR (Figure S1 in Supporting Information), we found that the peak at 11.8 ppm cross-talks to the HA2 peak of dA, and the one at 11.5 ppm cross-talks to the HA8 peak of dA. The NMR data can be best explained by coexistence of both Hoogsteen (HG) and Watson-Crick (WC) base pairs in equilibrium as delineated in Scheme 1. The HG base pair has been observed in crystals of alkylated nucleobase complexes by X-ray diffraction,27, 28 and in a dA:dU (silylated 2'-deoxyuridine) solution by NMR.29 It could even exist with a 1% probability in DNA.30, 31 The early calculations predicted that the HG base pair would be slightly more stable than the WC base pair.32, 33 Our data show that the HG base pair is a preferred form in the chloroform solution. Thus, we believe that the HG base pairing is intrinsic at least to A and T bases. This may be one of reasons why it can occur even in DNA double helices where the geometry is constrained to favor the WC base pairing. Compared to the WC base pair, the HG base pair has a shorter distance from N9 of dA to N1 of dT.34 As a result, the HC base pair may not fit well with Nac to form a stable triplex.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) 1H NMR spectra of a mixture of dA and dT in a ratio of 1:1 and a mixture of dA, dT and Nac in a ratio of 1:1:1 at room temperature; (b) 2D 1H-1H NOESY NMR spectra of a mixture of dA, dT and Nac in a 1:1:1 ratio and proton correlation assignments; (c) A schematic of molecular connections in the dA, dT and Nac complex.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

When mixing Nac with dA and dT in a 1:1:1 ratio, a single imino proton peak was only observed in the NMR spectrum (lower spectrum in Figure 3a). The variable concentration of NMR showed that amide protons of Nac and amino protons of the adenine were also involved in the hydrogen-bonding interactions (Figure S2 in Supporting Information). Formation of a Nac-dA:dT triplet was confirmed by 1H-1H NOESY NMR. In the 2D NOESY spectrum (Figure 3b), we only observed the cross peaks from the dT imino proton (HT3) correlating with HA6 and HA2 of dA (see Figure 3c for designation of each proton), implying that only the WC base pair was formed in the complex. Furthermore, both Hi and He of Nac are correlated to HA8 of dA, and the Hi is correlated to HT6 of dT as well. These NMR data allow us to sketch a connection among the three molecules shown in Figure 3c. Due to crowding in the region of methyl groups at the dT end of the complex, we cannot unambiguously assign the HT5-Hi cross peak. The DFT modelling shows that the amide ends of Nac are pushed out of the dA:dT base pair plane in the triplet because of the steric hindrances between acetyl groups of Nac and methyl group of thymine and HA8 of dA (see Figure 4 for the triplet conformation from computer modeling). This may explain why Hi is correlated with HT6 in the NOESY NMR. We noticed that two amide protons of Nac appeared as a single peak in the NMR spectrum of the complex. They were split into two broad peaks when the temperature was lowered to − 55 °C in an 800 MHz NMR spectrometer (Figure S3 in Supporting Information), indicating that these two protons were in a fast exchange within the NMR timeframe at room temperature. In contrast, guanine and cytosine only form a stable WC base pair under the same conditions for the A:T base pair. The formation of a triplet between Nac and the dG:dC base pair was confirmed by 2D NOESY NMR (Figure S4 in Supporting Information)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

DFT models of hydrogen bonded triplets of Nac with dT:dA (A), dU:dA (B), and dC:dG (C) calculated by B3LYP in combination with 6-31G* basis sets in vacuum

Based on the principle of complexation-induced chemical shifts (CIS),3538 we have determined association constants of Nac with DNA bases and base pairs by NMR titration (see Table 1). The silylated nucleosides (dA, dC, dG, dT, and dU) were used as either titrants or substrates, and Nac was only used as a substrate due to its limited solubility in chloroform. In a typical NMR titration experiment, a titrant was incrementally added to a substrate solution, and a proton NMR spectrum was recorded following each addition. In general, protons directly involved in hydrogen bonding exhibit downfield chemical shifts, resulting in positive CIS values. The proton we closely monitored in the NMR titration is listed in parentheses under the substrate in Table 1. First, the complexing stoichiometries between titrants and substrates were determined using the mole ratio plot.39, 40 We found that all of these complexes were fairly close to a 1:1 binding mode (Figure S5 in Supporting Information). The association constants (Kass) were then derived from curve fitting datasets of chemical shift vs. concentration in HypNMR 2008, a program to analyze NMR titration data. All of our NMR data were best fit to a 1:1 binding isotherm. We tested the reproducibility of our experimental process by performing the reverse titration. For example, titrating dA with dT yielded a virtually identical result with that from titrating dT with dA. The Kass value (~ 40 M−1) of the dA:dT base pairing we determined is close to that reported in literature.41, 42 As shown in Table 1, Nac was titrated with a series of individual nucleosides and their mixtures. Clearly, it formed a more stable complex with dC:dG than with dA:dT. Nonetheless, Kass of Nac complexing to dA:dT is comparable to that for the dA:dT base pairing. This Kass value, may underestimate the actual stability of Nac complexing to dA:dT because the dA and dT mixture mainly exists in a HG base pairing form in chloroform so that there is a free energy penalty to convert the HG base pair to the WC base pair for formation of the Nac-dA:dT triplet. When titrating a mixture of Nac and dT with dA or a mixture of Nac and dA with dT, the Kass values (~120 M−1) derived from monitoring HA6 and HT3 in these two mixed substrates are about three times higher than that of the dA:dT base pairing. This indicates that Nac could stabilize the dA:dT base pair. It has been known that the G-C base pair is very stable in a nonpolar solvent, such as chloroform (Kass = ~ 104–5M−1).41, 43 A 1:1 mixture of dG and dC is often treated as a single component in NMR titration experiments.4447 Titrating Nac with dG:dC yielded a relatively stable complex with an association constant of Kass ~ 467 M−1. However, Nac prevents dG from base pairing with dC because it forms a very stable complex with dG (Kass ~ 3990 M−1). As a result, when titrating a Nac and dG mixture with dC, a positive CIS on the imino proton of dG was obtained, indicating that there was a hydrogen bonding interaction between dG and dC, but the resultant Kass value (~ 710 M−1) is significantly smaller than one of the normal dG:dC base pairing. Thus, we have to follow an appropriate route to assemble a Nac-dG:dC triplet. We also notice that the 5-methyl group of dT did not cause any significant steric hindrances to the formation of an Nac-dT:dA triplet because there is a negligible difference in Kass between Nac-dT:dA and Nac–dU:dA.

Table 1.

Complexation induced chemical shift (CIS, ppm) and association constants (Kass, M−1) of Nac with individual nucleosides and nucleoside pairs derived from curve fitting of NMR titration data

Titrant

dA dC dG dT dU dA:dT dA:dU dG:dC
Substrate Nac (He) CISa 2.1 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.0 3.5 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.0 1.5 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.0
Kass 6.3 ± 1.4 53 ± 9 3889 ± 833 18 ± 3 31 ± 3 59 ± 1 62 ± 11 525 ± 166
dG-Nac (HG1) CIS 1.2 ± 0.0
Kass 710 ±151
dA-Nac (HA6) CIS 0.8 ± 0.0
Kass 115 ± 11
dT-Nac(HT3) CIS 0.4 ± 0.0
Kass 126 ± 4
[a]

CIS = δmax − δinitial in ppm, which was determined from the fit titration curve.

To interpret the NMR data, we constructed molecular models for the complexes of Nac with the nucleoside pairs (Figure 4), which were optimized by DFT calculations using B3LYP in combination with 6–31G* basis sets. As shown in Figure 4, Nac forms the hydrogen bonded triplets with the Watson-Crick base pairs from the major groove side. The DFT calculation indicates that Nac-dC:dG is more stable than Nac-dT:dA and Nac-dU:dA in terms of their complexing energies (ΔETot in Table 2). This matches the results from the NMR titrations. The higher stability of the Nac-dC:dG triplet may be attributed to the strong dG:dC base pair since the calculated hydrogen bonding energy of Nac with the dG:dC pair is close to those of Nac with the dU:dA and dT:dA pairs.

Table 2.

DFT energies (Kcal/mol) of the Nac triplets

ΔETot ΔE(Nac)
Nac-dT:dA − 39.3 − 22.4
Nac-dU:dA − 40.6 − 22.8
Rac-dC:dG − 54.5 − 20.7

Δ ETot: complexing energy calculated from energy of (complex - individual monomers constituting the complex)

ΔE (Nac): Hydrogen bonding energy of Nac calculated from energy of (complex − Nac – nucleoside pair)

Conclusions

Our DFT calculations and NMR studies reveal that 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine can form the hydrogen bonded triplets with both A:T and G:C Watson-Crick base pairs, which are as stable as the A:T base pair or more so. We have found that the naphthyridine molecule has a number of unique features: it tends to stabilize the A:T Watson-Crick base pair, block the A:T Hoogsteen base pairing, and form a stable complex with guanine to prevent the G:C base pairing. Due to differences in their structures, these triplet complexes should create different pathways for electron tunneling, resulting in distinguishable electrical signals for readout of the DNA base pairs in the tunneling gap which makes it a universal base pair reader. We are developing chemistry to attach the naphthyridine molecules to the metal electrodes for the tunneling measurements.

Experimental Section

General Information

Proton NMR (1H) spectra were recorded at 400 MHz on a Varian 400 MHz spectrometer, and carbon NMR (13C) spectra were recorded at 100 MHz on a Varian 400 MHz spectrometer. HRMS spectra were recorded using the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) technique. Flash chromatography was performed using automated flash chromatography (Teledyne Isco, Inc. CombiFlash Rf). All reagents were obtained from commercial suppliers unless otherwise stated. Where necessary, organic solvents were routinely dried and/or distilled prior to use and stored over molecular sieves under nitrogen. All reactions requiring anhydrous conditions were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere.

Synthesis of N,N'-(1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diyl)diacetamide (Nac)

A mixture of 1,8-naphthyridine-2,7-diamine 48 (280 mg, 1.75 mmol) in acetic anhydride (3mL) was heated at reflux for 2.5 h. After cooling, the excess solvent was removed, and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (on silica gel with a gradient of dichloromethane / methanol from 100:0 to 100:10 to give 180 mg (42%) of the product as a yellow powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.16 (s, 6H), 8.21 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 10.77 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 24.7, 113.3, 117.7, 139.2, 154.3, 154.8, 170.5. HRMS (APCI+): found, 245.1038 (calcd. for C12H13N4O2, 245.1043).

Silylation of nucleosides

All the nucleosides were silylated with tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride following our reported method.49

Computation

DFT calculations were performed in Program Spartan’10 for Windows, Wavefunction Inc.. Individual 2D chemical structures were drawn in ChemBioDraw Ultra 11 and exported to Spartan’10 to generate the respective 3D structures, from which hydrogen bonded complexes were constructed. The geometry of each complex was first subjected to energy minimization using the built-in MMFF94s molecular mechanics, and then calculated using B3LYP/6-311++G (2df, 2p) in vacuum. All of the calculations were successfully converged and no BSSE corrections were carried out for such a large basis set. Following completion of the calculation in vacuum, the complex was solvated with DMSO using B3LYP/6-31G** based on a SM8 model.50

1H NMR Binding Studies

Proton NMR (1H) spectra were recorded at 400 MHz on a Varian 400 MHz, 500 MHz on a Varian 500 MHz or 800 MHz on a Varian 800 MHz spectrometer. All 1H NMR chemical shifts were referenced to the residual non-deuterated solvent peak as 7.26 ppm in chloroform-d (CDCl3). 2D NOE spectra were recorded at 400 MHz on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer. For VT NMR, temperature was calibrated with a standard of 100% CH3OH and regulated to an accuracy of ±0.1 °C by a Eurotherm Variable Temperature Unit on the Bruker NMR or a Highland Technologies Temperature unit on the Varian NMR System. Temperatures below zero Celsius were achieved with a Liquid Nitrogen Heat Exchanger on the Bruker and FTS Cooling System (Stone Ridge, New York) on the Varian. CDCl3 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, used as received without further purification. Volumetric flasks and syringes for preparing the stock solutions were rinsed with CDCl3 and dried in vacuum prior to use. For NMR titration, samples were prepared from stock solutions, transferred to NMR tubes using a syringe, and diluted following the method in the previous report.51 Association constants reported were averages of two or more repeats and were derived from fitting NMR titration data to a 1:1 binding isotherm using the HypNMR program.

Supplementary Material

Supplement

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by the DNA sequencing technology program of the National Institute of Human Genome Research (HG004378). We thank Dr. Brian Cherry of the magnetic resonance research center at ASU for his technical support and informative discussion during the NMR experiments.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available:. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/

Notes and references

  • 1.Bras J, Guerreiro R, Hardy J. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012;13:453–464. doi: 10.1038/nrn3271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:685–696. doi: 10.1038/nrg2841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nelson MR, Wegmann D, Ehm MG, Kessner D, St Jean P, Verzilli C, Shen J, Tang Z, Bacanu SA, Fraser D, Warren L, Aponte J, Zawistowski M, Liu X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li J, Li Y, Li L, Woollard P, Topp S, Hall MD, Nangle K, Wang J, Abecasis G, Cardon LR, Zollner S, Whittaker JC, Chissoe SL, Novembre J, Mooser V. Science. 2012;337:100–104. doi: 10.1126/science.1217876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palomaki GE, Deciu C, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Bombard AT, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Canick JA. Genet. Med. 2012;14:296–305. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, Miller CA, Koboldt DC, Welch JS, Ritchey JK, Young MA, Lamprecht T, McLellan MD, McMichael JF, Wallis JW, Lu C, Shen D, Harris CC, Dooling DJ, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Chen K, Schmidt H, Kalicki-Veizer J, Magrini VJ, Cook L, McGrath SD, Vickery TL, Wendl MC, Heath S, Watson MA, Link DC, Tomasson MH, Shannon WD, Payton JE, Kulkarni S, Westervelt P, Walter MJ, Graubert TA, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, DiPersio JF. Nature. 2012;481:506–510. doi: 10.1038/nature10738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woollard PM, Mehta NA, Vamathevan JJ, Van Horn S, Bonde BK, Dow DJ. Drug Discov. Today. 2011;16:512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hajibabaei M, Shokralla S, Zhou X, Singer GA, Baird DJ. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuczynski J, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Parfrey LW, Clemente JC, Gevers D, Knight R. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:47–58. doi: 10.1038/nrg3129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morozova O, Marra MA. Genomics. 2008;92:255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rothberg JM, Hinz W, Rearick TM, Schultz J, Mileski W, Davey M, Leamon JH, Johnson K, Milgrew MJ, Edwards M, Hoon J, Simons JF, Marran D, Myers JW, Davidson JF, Branting A, Nobile JR, Puc BP, Light D, Clark TA, Huber M, Branciforte JT, Stoner IB, Cawley SE, Lyons M, Fu Y, Homer N, Sedova M, Miao X, Reed B, Sabina J, Feierstein E, Schorn M, Alanjary M, Dimalanta E, Dressman D, Kasinskas R, Sokolsky T, Fidanza JA, Namsaraev E, McKernan KJ, Williams A, Roth GT, Bustillo J. Nature. 2011;475:348–352. doi: 10.1038/nature10242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zwolak M, Ventra MD. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2008;80:141–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, Bayley H, Benner SA, Butler T, Ventra MD, Garaj S, Hibbs A, Huang X, Jovanovich SB, Krstic PS, Lindsay S, Ling XS, Mastrangelo CH, Meller A, Oliver JS, Pershin YV, Ramsey JM, Riehn R, Soni GV, Tabard-Cossa V, Wanunu M, Wiggin M, Schloss JA. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1146–1153. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manrao EA, Derrington IM, Laszlo AH, Langford KW, Hopper MK, Gillgren N, Pavlenok M, Niederweis M, Gundlach JH. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:349–353. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cherf GM, Lieberman KR, Rashid H, Lam CE, Karplus K, Akeson M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:344–348. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang S, He J, Chang S, Zhang P, Liang F, Li S, Tuchband M, Fuhrman A, Ros R, Lindsay S. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:868–873. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chang S, He J, Kibel A, Lee M, Sankey O, Zhang P, Lindsay S. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009;4:297–301. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hari Y, Obika S, Imanishi T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012;15:2875–2887. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rusling DA, Powers VEC, Ranasinghe RT, Yang Wang1, Osborne SD, Brown T, Fox KR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:3025–3032. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Semenyuk A, Darian E, Liu J, Majumdar A, Cuenoud B, Miller PS, MacKerell AD, Jr, Seidman MM. Biochemistry. 2010;49:7867–7878. doi: 10.1021/bi100797z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuramoto K, Tarashima N, Hirama Y, Kikuchi Y, Minakawa N, Matsuda A. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:10818–10820. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13805g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ogata S, Kuramoto K, Inoue N, Minakawa N, Matsuda A. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 2006;50:153–154. doi: 10.1093/nass/nrl076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao Q, Satake H, Dai Q, Ono K, Nishizawa S, Teramae N. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 2005;49:219–220. doi: 10.1093/nass/49.1.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakatani K, Sando S, Kumasawa H, Kikuchi J, Saito I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:12650–12657. doi: 10.1021/ja0109186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li Y, Park T, Quansah JK, Zimmerman SC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:17118–17121. doi: 10.1021/ja2069278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoock C, Reichert J, Schmidtke M. Molecules. 1999;4:264–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barawkar DA, Ganesh KN. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:159–164. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mathews FS, Rich A. J. Mol. Biol. 1964;8:89–95. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80151-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoogsteen K. Acta Cryst. 1959;12:822–823. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dunger A, Limbach HH, Weisz K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:10109–10114. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nikolova EN, Gottardo FL, Al-Hashimi HM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:3667–3670. doi: 10.1021/ja2117816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O’Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Nature. 2011;470:498–502. doi: 10.1038/nature09775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Could IR, Kollman PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:2493–2499. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trollape KI, Gould IR, Hillier IH. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993;209:113–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Honig B, Rohs R. Nature. 2010;470:472–473. doi: 10.1038/470472a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Packer MJ, Zonta C, Hunter CA. J. Magn.,Reson. 2003;162:102–112. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rudiger V, Schneider HJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2000;6:3771–3776. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20001016)6:20<3771::aid-chem3771>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hunter CA, Packer MJ. Chem. Eur. J. 1999;5:1891–1897. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brouwer DH, Alavi S, Ripmeester JA. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008;10:3857–3860. doi: 10.1039/b805326j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chriswell CD, Schilt AA. Anal. Chem. 1975;47:1623–1629. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Connors KA. Binding Constants. New York Chichester Brisbabe Toroto Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sartorius J, Schneider HJ. Chem. Eur. J. 1996;2:1446–1452. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Caruso T, Capobianco A, Peluso A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:15347–11535. doi: 10.1021/ja076181n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kyogoku Y, Lord RC, Rich A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1969;179:10–17. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90116-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mertz E, Mattei S, Zimmerman SC. Org. Lett. 2000;2:2931–2934. doi: 10.1021/ol006157d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang W, Purwanto MGM, Weisz K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004;2:1194–1198. doi: 10.1039/b316077g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xiao Z, Weisz K. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2007;20:771–777. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zimmerman SC, Schmitt P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:10769–10770. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Corbin PS, Zimmerman SC, Thiessen PA, Hawryluk NA, Murray TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:10475–10488. doi: 10.1021/ja010638q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chang S, Huang S, He J, Liang F, Zhang P, Li S, Chen X, Sankey O, Lindsay S. Nano Lett. 2010;10:1070–1075. doi: 10.1021/nl1001185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marenich AV, Olson RM, Kelly CP, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007;3:2011–2033. doi: 10.1021/ct7001418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liang F, Li S, Lindsay S, Zhang P. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:5998–6007. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement

RESOURCES