Abstract
Background
Little is known about the impact of comorbidity on HRQOL in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the association of comorbidity and health-related HRQOL among participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS).
Materials & Methods
In 2006, we queried NARCOMS participants regarding physical and mental comorbidities and HRQOL, using the Short Form-12. We summarized physical HRQOL using the aggregate Physical Component Scale (PCS-12) score, and mental HRQOL using the aggregate Mental Component Scale (MCS-12) score. We assessed multivariable associations between comorbidity and HRQOL using a general linear model, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results
Among 8983 respondents, the mean (SD) PCS-12 was 36.9 (11.8) and MCS-12 was 45.6 (11.6). After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors, participants with any physical comorbidity had a lower PCS-12 (37.2; 95% CI: 36.4-38.1) than those without any physical comorbidity (40.1; 95% CI: 39.0-41.1). As the number of physical comorbidities increased PCS-12 scores decreased (r = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.23- -0.27) indicating lower reported HRQOL. Participants with any mental comorbidity had a lower MCS-12 (40.7; 95% CI: 39.8-41.6) than those without any mental comorbidity (48.5; 95% CI: 47.7-49.4).
Conclusions
Comorbidity is associated with reduced HRQOL in MS. Further research should evaluate whether more aggressive treatment of comorbidities improves the HRQOL of MS patients.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis, epidemiology, comorbidity, quality of life
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients score lower on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures as compared to the general population.(1, 2) They also score lower on HRQOL measures when compared to patients with other chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease.(3) Identification of modifiable factors which affect HRQOL could potentially improve the lives of MS patients.
In MS, factors which affect HRQOL are similar to those in other diseases and the general population and include age, sex, socioeconomic status, disability, and symptoms such as fatigue.(4) Although comorbidity is common in MS,(5) and comorbidity is associated with reduced HRQOL in other chronic diseases,(6) little is known about the impact of comorbidity on HRQOL in MS. One study suggested that MS patients with musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions had poorer physical HRQOL, but that small study was restricted to persons with relapsing-remitting MS.(7)
We investigated the association of comorbidity and HRQOL among participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS). We hypothesized that participants with comorbidities would have lower HRQOL than those without comorbidities, and that the magnitude of the effect would vary across comorbidities. We further hypothesized that physical comorbidities would predominantly affect physical rather than mental aspects of HRQOL based on reports in other disease populations.(8)
Materials & Methods
The methods for this study are detailed elsewhere.(5) Briefly, we surveyed active participants in the NARCOMS Registry, a voluntary self-report registry for patients with MS.(9) The NARCOMS registry is approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. At enrollment, participants provide demographic and clinical information, including date of birth; age of initial symptom onset; and age and year of MS diagnosis. Semiannually participants complete update questionnaires to update their information regarding disability, HRQOL, and treatment status. These update questionnaires also capture information about topics which vary from one questionnaire to the next.
In 2006, we queried NARCOMS participants about physical comorbidities, specifically hypertension, cancer (breast, lung, colon, rectal, skin), diabetes, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, lung disease, cataracts, glaucoma, uveitis, peptic ulcer disease, liver disease, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune thyroid disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren’s disease, kidney disease, arthritis, fibromyalgia, anemia, and knee/hip replacements.(5) We also queried participants regarding mental comorbidities including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Participants indicated the presence or absence of each comorbidity.
We measured HRQOL using the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) version 2.0, a shortened version of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). The SF-12 consists of 12 items, each capturing an aspect of one of the eight subscales in the SF-36. The SF-12 captures approximately 90% of the variance of the SF-36,(10) is recommended for use in large surveys, and has been used in MS populations.(11) The generic nature of the SF-12 permits comparison of results regarding the impact of comorbidities on MS HRQOL with those of comorbidities on HRQOL in other patient populations. An aggregate Physical Component Scale (PCS-12) score summarizes physical HRQOL, with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). An aggregate Mental Component Scale (MCS-12) score summarizes mental HRQOL, with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The PCS-12 and MCS-12 are standardized to reflect a general population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. We calculated effect sizes for comorbidities under study by calculating the difference in mean scores in the affected and unaffected groups, and dividing by a standard deviation of 10.(4) Effect sizes are measures of the magnitude of effect in terms of standard deviation units which facilitate comparisons between populations.(12) As suggested elsewhere, we defined effect sizes of 0.2 as small, 0.5 as moderate, and 0.8 as large.(12)
We measured disability using Patient Determined Disease Steps, a validated self-report measure which correlates well with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).(13) It is scored ordinally from 0 to 8, where a score of 0 approximates an EDSS score of 0, a score of 3 represents early gait disability without needing an assistive device and approximates an EDSS score of 4.0 to 4.5; and scores of 4, 5, and 6 represent EDSS scores of 6 to 6.5.
Of 18,000 active participants, 16037 met the inclusion criteria for the primary study: residence in the United States with complete data regarding date of birth, age of MS symptom onset, age of MS diagnosis; and age of symptom onset ≥16 years and <60 years. The inclusion criteria aimed to reduce heterogeneity in diagnostic testing and access to care, and to limit heterogeneity due to differences in prognosis among persons with very early or late onset MS.(14, 15)
Initially, we evaluated the association between reporting any of the physical comorbidities or any of the mental comorbidities queried and PCS-12 scores. Then we evaluated the association of individual comorbidities with a frequency of 5% or more in this population and PCS-12 scores, to focus on those conditions likely to be important at the population level. We summarized continuous variables using means and standard deviations (SD) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percents. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess univariate associations between comorbidity and the PCS-12. Multivariable associations between comorbidity and the PCS-12 were assessed using a general linear model. We used the linear model to calculate mean SF-12 scores, adjusting for the following potential confounders derived from existing literature:(7) age; sex; race; socioeconomic status as measured by education, annual household income, and health insurance status; marital status; region of residence in the United States; disability status; year of symptom onset; and treatment status. We then repeated this analysis for MCS-12 scores.
Race was included as indicator variables for White (reference group), African-American, and Other. Education was included as indicator variables for <12 years (reference group), high school diploma, Associate’s Degree or Technical Degree, Bachelor’s Degree, post-graduate degree. Annual household income was included as indicator variables for <$15000 (reference group), $15000-30000, $30000-50000, $50000-100000, >$100000. Insurance status was included as indicator variables for private, public (reference group), or none. Region of residence was included as indicator variables for West (reference group), Midwest, South, and East as defined by the US Census bureau. Marital status was dichotomized as married/co-habiting versus single/divorced/widowed/living alone (reference group). Age was included as a continuous variable. Using PDDS, participants were classified as having mild (EDSS ≤3, reference group), moderate (EDSS 4 to 5.5), or severe (EDSS ≥ 6) disability.(16) Year of symptom onset was categorized as <1986, 1986-1995, ≥1996 because of non-linearity with HRQoL. Ever treatment with any of the approved disease-modifying therapies (IFNß-1a (Avonex), IFNß-1b (Betaseron), IFNß-1a (Rebif), Glatiramer Acetate (Copaxone), or Natalizumab (Tysabri)) was dichotomized as yes or no. Ever treatment with immunosuppressive therapies was dichotomized as yes or no.
All statistical analyses used SAS V9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results
As reported previously, 8983 (55.7%) of eligible participants responded to the questionnaire.(5) Their characteristics are outlined in Table 1, and were similar to other MS populations.(17) Survey responders were more likely to be white, women, and of higher socioeconomic status than non-responders.(5)
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of responders to the NARCOMS Fall 2006 questionnaire
Characteristic | Responders |
---|---|
Sex, n (%) | |
Female | 6811 (75.8) |
Male | 2172 (24.2) |
Race, n (%) | |
White | 8442 (94.3) |
Black | 218 (2.4) |
Other | 293 (3.3) |
Education, n (%) | |
<12 yrs | 165 (1.9) |
High school diploma | 3128 (35.0) |
Associate’s or Technical degree | 1448 (16.2) |
Bachelor’s degree | 2395 (26.8) |
Post-graduate degree | 1790 (20.1) |
Annual Income, n (%) | |
<$15000 | 888 (11.9) |
$15000-30000 | 1292 (17.3) |
$30000-50000 | 1605 (21.5) |
$50000-100000 | 2418 (32.3) |
>$100,000 | 1276 (17.1) |
Health Insurance, n (%) | |
Private | 6601 (75.2) |
Public | 2057 (23.4) |
None | 126 (1.4) |
Current age (years), mean (SD) | 52.7 (10.4) |
Age of symptom onset (years), mean (SD) | 31.2 (9.0) |
Age of diagnosis (years), mean (SD) | 38.2 (9.5) |
Clinical Course, n (%) | |
Relapsing | 7602 (88.5) |
Progressive | 991 (11.5) |
Patient Determined Disease Steps (categorized), n (%) | |
Mild | 3178 (35.4) |
Moderate | 1067 (11.9) |
Severe | 4738 (52.7) |
These participants frequently reported physical comorbidities,(5) including hypercholesterolemia (37.0%), hypertension (30.1%), arthritis (16%), irritable bowel syndrome (13.2%), chronic lung disease (13.0%), anemia (12.6%), cataracts (12.1%), thyroid disease (10.0%), peptic ulcer disease (7.8%), heart disease (6.9%), diabetes (6.1%), fibromyalgia (4.9%). The remaining comorbidities were reported by fewer than 5% of participants. Mental comorbidities were also common, particularly depression (46.0%) and anxiety (16.5%).(18)
Physical HRQOL
The mean (SD) PCS-12 was 36.9 (11.8). The mean PCS-12 was more than 5 points lower in participants with any physical comorbidity (35.7 (11.5)) than in participants without any physical comorbidity (40.9 (12.1), p<0.0001). The mean PCS-12 score was less than 1 point lower in participants with any mental comorbidity (36.5 (11.3)) than in participants without any mental comorbidity (37.3 (10.4), p = 0.007).
After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, region of residence, year of symptom onset, MS disability level, clinical course, and treatment status, participants with any physical comorbidity still had a lower PCS-12 (37.3; 95% CI: 36.4-38.2) than those without any physical comorbidity (39.8; 95% CI: 38.8-40.8). Participants with any mental comorbidity had a slightly lower PCS-12 (38.2; 95% CI: 37.3-39.2) than those without any mental comorbidity (38.9; 95% CI: 38.0-39.8), but of unlikely clinical significance. Race was not associated with HRQOL, and we did not identify any interaction between comorbidity and sex, nor between physical and mental comorbidity on HRQOL. There was an interaction between comorbidity and disability status such that the impact of physical comorbidity on HRQOL diminished with increasing disability. Among the mildly disabled the difference between PCS-12 scores in those with physical comorbidity as compared to those without physical comorbidity was 2.5, while among the severely disabled the difference was 1.7. Among the mildly disabled the difference between PCS-12 scores in those with mental comorbidity as compared to those without mental comorbidity was 1.6, while among the severely disabled the difference was -0.5.
We proceeded to evaluate the associations of individual comorbidities with physical HRQOL, focusing on comorbidities with a frequency of 10% or more in this population. All comorbidities evaluated were associated with reduced PCS-12 scores (all p<0.0001, Table 2). In a multivariable model simultaneously including individual comorbidities, hypertension, heart disease, lung disease, thyroid disease, peptic ulcer disease, arthritis, irritable bowel syndrome, anemia, and fibromyalgia were each independently associated with reduced PCS-12 scores. Depression and anxiety were not associated with reduced PCS-12 scores. In the multivariable model, the interaction noted previously between comorbidity and disability status remained evident for heart disease (p = 0.015), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.026), and arthritis (p = 0.0002).
Table 2.
Unadjusted mean (standard deviation) and adjusted mean Physical Component Scores (PCS-12) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in NARCOMS participants with and without comorbidities (adjusted for age, sex, education, income, health insurance status, disability status, year of symptom onset, clinical course, and treatment status)
Comorbidity | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Adjusted p-value |
Effect Sizea |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Unadjusted Mean (SD) | Unadjusted Mean (SD) | Adjusted Mean | 95% CI | Adjusted Mean | 95% CI | |||
Hypercholesterolemiab | 38.2 (12.1) | 34.8 (12.1) | 31.2 | 29.8, 32.7 | 30.6 | 29.1, 32.0 | 0.027 | 0.06 |
Cataracts | 37.6 (11.9) | 32.4 (10.3) | 31.2 | 29.8, 32.6 | 30.6 | 29.1, 32.1 | 0.16 | 0.06 |
Hypertension | 38.2 (12.1) | 33.7 (10.6) | 31.2 | 29.8, 32.7 | 30.5 | 29.1, 32.0 | 0.013 | 0.07 |
Diabetes | 37.3 (11.9) | 32.0 (10.4) | 31.0 | 29.7, 29.1 | 30.7 | 29.1, 32.4 | 0.57 | 0.03 |
Thyroid | 37.1 (11.8) | 35.6 (11.6) | 31.4 | 30.0, 32.8 | 30.4 | 28.9, 31.9 | 0.019 | 0.10 |
Anemia | 37.0 (11.9) | 36.0 (11.6) | 31.5 | 30.0, 32.9 | 30.3 | 28.8, 31.8 | 0.002 | 0.12 |
Irritable bowel syndrome | 37.2 (11.8) | 35.2 (11.7) | 31.5 | 30.1, 32.9 | 30.3 | 28.8, 31.8 | 0.002 | 0.12 |
Lung disease | 37.3 (11.9) | 34.3 (11.2) | 31.6 | 30.2, 33.1 | 30.2 | 28.7, 31.7 | 0.0004 | 0.14 |
Heart diseaseb | 37.3 (11.9) | 31.7 (10.1) | 31.9 | 30.6, 28.2 | 29.9 | 28.2, 31.5 | 0.0007 | 0.20 |
Peptic ulcer disease | 37.2 (11.8) | 33.8 (11.7) | 31.5 | 30.2, 32.9 | 30.2 | 28.7, 31.8 | 0.005 | 0.13 |
Arthritisb | 37.7 (11.9) | 33.0 (10.6) | 31.7 | 30.3, 33.2 | 30.0 | 28.6, 31.5 | <0.0001 | 0.17 |
Fibromyalgia | 37.2 (11.8) | 31.3 (10.3) | 33.0 | 31.6, 34.3 | 28.8 | 27.2, 30.5 | <0.0001 | 0.42 |
Depressionb | 37.3 (12.2) | 36.4 (11.3) | 31.1 | 29.6, 32.5 | 30.7 | 29.3, 32.1 | 0.23 | 0.04 |
Anxiety | 36.9 (11.9) | 37.1 (11.4) | 30.7 | 29.3, 32.1 | 31.0 | 29.6, 32.5 | 0.36 | 0.03 |
Difference of means divided by standard deviation of 10. Effect sizes of 0.2 are small, 0.5 are moderate, and 0.8 are large.(12)
Interaction with disability status: heart disease (p = 0.015), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.026), arthritis (p = 0.0002), depression (p <0.0001)
As the number of physical comorbidities increased PCS-12 scores decreased (r = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.23- -0.27) indicating lower reported HRQOL. This dose-response relationship remained after adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, region of residence, year of symptom onset, disability, clinical course, and treatment status (Table 3, χ2 for linear trend 207.3, p<0.0001).
Table 3.
Unadjusted mean (standard deviation) and adjusted mean Physical Component Scores (PCS-12) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in NARCOMS participants according to the number of physical comorbidities reported
Number of Comorbidities | Number of Affected Participants | Unadjusted Mean (SD) | Adjusted Mean* | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2076 | 40.8 (12.1) | 40.2 | 39.2, 41.1 |
1 | 2097 | 38.5 (12.1) | 38.8 | 37.8, 39.8 |
2 | 1766 | 36.7 (11.3) | 37.7 | 36.7, 38.7 |
3 | 1141 | 36.2 (10.9) | 35.7 | 36.0, 38.2 |
4 | 789 | 33.5 (10.7) | 34.6 | 34.6, 37.0 |
5 | 478 | 32.3 (10.2) | 33.8 | 33.3, 35.9 |
≥6 | 636 | 30.3 (9.4) | 34.3 | 32.5, 35.1 |
adjusted for age, sex, education, income, health insurance status, year of symptom onset, clinical course, region of residence, disability status, and treatment status; all p <0.0001
Mental HRQOL
The mean (SD) MCS-12 was 45.6 (11.6). The unadjusted mean MCS-12 was only slightly lower in participants with any physical comorbidity (45.3 (11.7)) than in participants without any physical comorbidity (46.7 (11.3), p<0.0001). The mean MCS-12 score was more than 8 points lower in participants with any mental comorbidity (41.4 (11.3)) than in participants without any mental comorbidity (49.6 (10.4), p<0.0001).
After adjustment for age, socioeconomic status, clinical course, and treatment status, participants with one or more physical comorbidities had a similar MCS-12 (44.5; 95% CI: 44.2-45.8) to those without any physical comorbidity (44.8; 95% CI: 45.8-47.7). Participants with any mental comorbidity had a lower MCS-12 (40.7; 95% CI: 39.8-41.6) than those without any mental comorbidity (48.5; 95% CI: 47.7-49.4). There was no interaction between physical and mental comorbidity, nor between comorbidity and disability status. We evaluated the associations of individual comorbidities with mental HRQOL. Fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, depression and anxiety were all independently associated with lower MCS-12 scores (Table 4).
Table 4.
Unadjusted mean (standard deviation) and adjusted mean Mental Component Scores (MCS-12) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in NARCOMS participants with and without comorbidities (adjusted for age, sex, education, income, year of symptom onset, age of symptom onset, clinical course, and treatment status)
Comorbidity | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Adjusted p-value |
Effect Size* |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Unadjusted Mean (SD) | Unadjusted Mean (SD) | Adjusted Mean | 95% CI | Adjusted Mean | 95% CI | |||
Depression | 49.7 (10.3) | 41.1 (11.3) | 45.0 | 43.9, 46.2 | 38.0 | 37.0, 39.1 | <0.0001 | 0.70 |
Anxiety | 47.0 (11.2) | 39.1 (11.3) | 43.7 | 42.6, 44.7 | 39.4 | 38.2, 40.6 | <0.0001 | 0.43 |
Irritable bowel syndrome | 46.1 (11.5) | 42.8 (11.6) | 42.1 | 41.1, 43.2 | 40.9 | 39.7, 42.1 | 0.006 | 0.12 |
Fibromyalgia | 45.8 (11.5) | 41.7 (11.9) | 42.5 | 41.6, 43.5 | 40.5 | 39.0, 42.0 | 0.003 | 0.20 |
Sensitivity Analyses
Our findings were unchanged when we repeated our analyses restricting them to participants reporting a relapsing course at onset, or to participants with an age of symptom onset between 16 and 50 years.
Discussion
With a mean PCS-12 score of 36.9, physical HRQOL in the NARCOMS population was similar to that reported by the Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study (36.2),(4) and as expected, substantially lower than that reported for the general population. After accounting for potentially confounding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics,(4, 7) factors we found that participant reports of any physical comorbidity had an independent, negative impact on physical HRQOL, while mental comorbidity did not have a clinically significant impact.
Although not universally, similar findings are reported in other chronic diseases.(19) In a study of 15,000 patients from eight datasets, the presence of comorbidities was associated with poorer HRQOL regardless of the primary condition.(19) One study of 262 MS patients beginning disease-modifying therapy found that the concurrent presence of musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions reduced physical QOL.(7) When evaluated using effect sizes, the impact of comorbidity on physical HRQOL in the NARCOMS population was minimal for most individual conditions, with only heart disease having a small effect (effect size 0.20) and only fibromyalgia (effect size 0.42) having a moderate effect. In the general population, conditions such as angina have moderate to large effects on HRQOL (effect size 0.70), and fibromyalgia has large effects (effect size 2.0).(20-22) This suggests that these comorbid conditions impact HRQOL less in the MS population than in the general population, or at least that they do not have an additive effect. This may reflect a floor effect given the already substantial impact of MS on HRQOL. Similar observations have been made in a study of 615 persons with inflammatory bowel disease,(23) where the severity of the inflammatory bowel disease was the most important determinant of HRQOL. Similarly, we observed that the impact of comorbidity on physical HRQOL was greater in patients with mild to moderate disability than in patients with severe disability.
We observed a substantial dose-response relationship (Table 2) between comorbidity and quality of life, with physical HRQOL decreasing steadily with an increasing number of comorbidities. Studies of comorbidity in asthma, cancer and other chronic diseases have also observed such dose-response relationships.(8, 24, 25) The only previous study examining a dose-response relationship between comorbidity and HRQOL in MS was negative.(26) Warren et al. examined the association between comorbidity and HRQOL, as measured using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 version, among 335 persons with MS responding to the Canadian Community Health Survey. The mean HRQOL score of participants with no comorbidity was 0.12 points higher than the mean score of participants with any comorbidity, but there was no association with the number of comorbidities. That study differed from the present study in several important respects; it had a smaller sample size, was conducted solely in Canada, and did not distinguish between comorbidities and complications of disease.
Mental comorbidity adversely influenced mental HRQOL, as did irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia. The impact of mental comorbidity is not surprising.(27) Turpin et al. reported that persons with relapsing remitting MS and digestive system problems had worse mental HRQOL.(7) Irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia are both conditions which are frequently comorbid with depression and anxiety. Persons who seek care for irritable bowel syndrome are more likely to have psychiatric disorders than those who do not seek care and remain undiagnosed. Further, irritable bowel syndrome and mental comorbidity may share a common neurobiology.(28) Patients with fibromyalgia report worse mental HRQOL than patients with rheumatoid arthritis.(29) Our findings suggest that MS patients with any of depression, anxiety, irritable bowel syndrome or fibromyalgia should be considered at particular risk for poor mental HRQOL.
Physical and mental comorbidities are common in MS, and physical comorbidities increase in frequency with age. We evaluated comorbidities affecting 5% or more of the NARCOMS population to focus on comorbidities likely to be commonly identified in other MS populations. The finding that the effects of physical comorbidities were cumulative suggests that aggressively managing comorbidities may be an avenue for improving HRQOL in MS, and that integrated approaches to care should be given stronger emphasis. Emerging disease-modifying therapies for MS may increase the risk of developing comorbidities,(30) raising questions as to whether these comorbidities may ultimately negate expected improvements in HRQOL from these therapies. Studies of interventions designed to improve HRQOL in MS should measure comorbidities, and consider evaluating the impact of those interventions on the comorbidities and on MS.
An important analytic consideration was potential confounders of the association between comorbidity and HRQOL. After adjusting for confounders, the mean PCS-12 score improved among participants reporting comorbidities, but minimally worsened among participants without comorbidities. Persons with MS and physical comorbidities are more likely to be male, older, and of lower socioeconomic status than persons with MS who do not report physical comorbidities.(5) Persons with MS of lower socioeconomic status are at increased risk of mental comorbidity.(31) By identifying a person with MS and comorbidity the health care provider is likely identifying an individual who has multiple factors adversely affecting HRQOL. Future studies should consider examining the relative impact of the various determinants of HRQOL, and how the effects of these determinants are mediated,(32) as part of a broader strategy to improve HRQOL.
Limitations of this study should be noted. Our response rate was 55.7%, slightly lower than the mean response rate of 60% among published mail surveys.(33) Non-responders tended to have lower SES than responders, and the NARCOMS Registry is a volunteer registry which does not represent the entire MS population in the United States. Nonetheless, the registry population has similar characteristics to those reported for MS patients from the National Health Interview Survey.(34) The NARCOMS population is large, socio-demographically diverse, represents all regions of the US, and reflects MS patients with a broad range of disease duration and disability status. Comorbidity data were self-reported, but testing of the questionnaire among 404 persons with MS suggested that they can accurately report several common comorbidities.(35) Further, some studies suggest self-report data predict HRQoL as well or better than comorbidity data from medical records.(36, 37) The study was cross-sectional thus we cannot establish a causal relationship between MS, comorbidity, and HRQOL.
Physical comorbidity is associated with substantially lower physical HRQOL in MS. Future studies in population-based cohorts are needed to determine if the impact of comorbidity differs by domain of HRQOL, to determine if changes in HRQOL over time differ in the presence of comorbidity, and to establish whether treating comorbidities can improve HRQOL in MS. We did not investigate the mechanisms by which comorbidity influences HRQOL, which could reflect either the effects of the comorbidity, or the effects of the treatment for the comorbidity on MS, or both. Little is known about the effects of concomitant therapy on the health and well being of MS patients, and this also deserves investigation.
Acknowledgments
Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Career Development Programs Grant K12 HD049091. Supported in part by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- 1.Hermann B, Vickrey B, Hays RD, et al. A comparison of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy, diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Epilepsy Research. 1996;25:113–118. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(96)00024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr K-M, Nyland HI. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Measuring the disease effects more broadly. Neurology. 1999;53:1098–1103. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.5.1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rudick RA, Miller DM, Clough JD, Gragg LA, Farmer RG. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Comparison with inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Archives of Neurology. 1992;49:1237–1242. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360035014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu N, Minden SL, Hoaglin DC, Hadden L, Frankel D. Quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: data from the Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. 2007;30:233–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marrie RA, Horwitz R, Cutter G, et al. Comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis. 2008;14:1091–1098. doi: 10.1177/1352458508092263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, et al. Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Quality of Life Research. 2006;15:83–91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-8661-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Turpin KV, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hader WJ. Deterioration in the health-related quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis: the possible warning signs. Multiple Sclerosis. 2007;13:1038–1045. doi: 10.1177/1352458507078393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baumeister H, Balke K, Härter M. Psychiatric and somatic comorbidities are negatively associated with quality of life in physically ill patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2005;58:1090–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. NARCOMS Multiple Sclerosis Registry 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:1171–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr KM, Nyland HI. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Medical Care. 2000;38:1022–1028. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, et al. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:141–155. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hohol MJ, Orav EJ, Weiner HL. Disease Steps in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study comparing disease steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression. Multiple Sclerosis. 1999;5:349–354. doi: 10.1177/135245859900500508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Polliack ML, Barak Y, Achiron A. Late-onset multiple sclerosis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49:168–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gusev E, Boiko A, Bikova O, et al. The natural history of early onset multiple sclerosis: comparison of data from Moscow and Vancouver. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2002;104:203–207. doi: 10.1016/s0303-8467(02)00039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marrie RA, Cutter G, Tyry T, Vollmer T, Campagnolo D. Does multiple sclerosis-associated disability differ between races? Neurology. 2006;66:1235–1240. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208505.81912.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Collins JG. Prevalence of selected chronic conditions, United States, 1986-88. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics. 1993;10:1–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marrie RA, Horwitz RI, Cutter G, et al. The burden of mental comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: Frequent, underdiagnosed, and under-treated. Multiple Sclerosis. 2009;15:385–392. doi: 10.1177/1352458508099477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sprangers MAG, de Regt EB, Andries F, et al. Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53:895–907. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00204-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grandy S, Chapman RH, Fox KM for the SHIELD Study Group. Quality of life and depression of people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus and those at low and high risk for type 2 diabetes: findings from the Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD) International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2008;62:562–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01703.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reisine S, Fifield J, Walsh S, Dauser D. Employment and quality of life outcomes among women with fibromyalgia compared to healthy controls. Women & Health. 2004;39:1–20. doi: 10.1300/J013v39n04_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Tountas Y. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007;5:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pizzi LT, Weston CM, Goldfarb NI, et al. Impact of chronic conditions on quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2006;12:47–52. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000191670.04605.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Erickson SR, C RD, Jr, Kirking DM, Halman LJ. Relationship between patient and disease characteristics, and health-related quality of life in adults with asthma. Respiratory Medicine. 2002;96:450–460. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Stommel M, Given CW, Given B. Loss of physical functioning among geriatric cancer patients: relationships to cancer site, treatment, comorbidity and age. European Journal of Cancer. 1997;33:2352–2358. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00323-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Warren SA, Turpin KV, Pohar SL, Jones CA, Warren KG. Comorbidity and health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care. 2009;11:6–16. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Janssens ACJW, van Doorn PA, de Boer JB, et al. Anxiety and depression influence the relation between disability status and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis. 2003;9:397–403. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms930oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lydiard RB. Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Anxiety, and Depression: What Are the Links? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2001;62:38–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Girolimetti R, et al. Health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia patients: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients and the general population using the SF-36 health survey. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2009;27:S67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cohen JA. Emerging Therapies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Archives of Neurology. 2009;66:821–828. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marrie RA, Horwitz RI, Cutter G, et al. The burden of mental comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: Frequent, underdiagnosed, and under-treated. Neurology. 2008;70(Suppl 1) doi: 10.1177/1352458508099477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirchner T, Lara S. Stress and depression symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: the mediating role of the loss of social functioning. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997;50:1129–1136. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marrie RA, Hadjimichael O, Vollmer T. Predictors of alternative medicine use by multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis. 2003;9:461–466. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms953oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Horton M, Rudick RA, Hara-Cleaver C, Marrie RA. Validation of a Self-Report Comorbidity Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;35:83–90. doi: 10.1159/000311013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bayliss EA, Ellis JL, Steiner JF. Subjective assessments of comorbidity correlate with quality of life health outcomes: initial validation of a comorbidity assessment instrument. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2005;2:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Voaklander D, Kelly KD, Jones CA, Suarez-Almazor ME. Self report co-morbidity and health related quality of life - a comparison with record based co-morbidity measures. Social Indicators Research. 2004;66:213–228. [Google Scholar]