Skip to main content
Mædica logoLink to Mædica
. 2013 Mar;8(1):43–48.

Tropomyosin-Receptor-Kinases Signaling in the Nervous System

Bogdan STOLERU a,*, Alisa Madalina POPESCU a,*, Daniela Elise TACHE a, Oana Maria NEAMTU a, Ghazaleh EMAMI a, Ligia Gabriela TATARANU b,c, Alice Sandra BUTEICA d, Anica DRICU a, Stefana Oana PURCARU a
PMCID: PMC3749761  PMID: 24023598

ABSTRACT

The development and function of the nervous system is dependent on many growth factors and their signaling. Tropomyosin-receptor-kinase receptor family controls synaptic strength and plasticity in the mammalian nervous system. Dysregulation of Tropomyosin-receptor-kinase receptors signaling can lead to neural developmental disorders and has been reported in certain diseases of the nervous system. Apart from their role in the nervous system, these tyrosine kinase receptors are also involved in cancer biology. Tropomyosin-receptor-kinases and their ligands, neurotrophins, are also involved in neural precursor stem cells differentiation. This review focuses on Tropomyosin-receptor-kinases, the most abundant receptors in mammalian nervous system.

INTRODUCTION

Tropomyosin-receptor-kinase (Trk) receptors belong to a family of growth factor receptors with tyrosine kinase activity that controls synaptic strength and plasticity of the mammalian nervous system. Growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases (GFR-TK) are transmembrane proteins that are involved in cell growth, survival, differentiation and apoptosis.

The first tyrosine kinase receptor, Bcr-Abl, which is a result of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation, was discovered more than three decades ago, by Janet Rowley (1). Since that moment on, many members of this family of cell-surface receptors have become known as key regulators of critical cellular processes, such as proliferation and differentiation, cell survival and metabolism, cell migration, and cell-cycle control (2-4). Over the past 30 years, a number of 58 GFR-TKs has been identified in human, which have been divided into 20 subfamilies (4).

There is high similarity in molecular structure of GFR-TKs, all of them consisting of ligand-binding domains in the extracellular section of the protein, one transmembrane helix, a cytoplasmic section that has the protein tyrosine kinase activity and a regulatory domain, adjacent to the cell membrane (4). The whole topology of GFR-TKs, their mechanism and key components of the intracellular signaling pathways are highly preserved in evolution from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to humans. Moreover, many maladies are triggered by genetic alterations or abnormalities that modify the action, frequency, cellular spreading, or regulation of GFR-TKs. Diabetes and cancer are the most frequent diseases, related to abnormal function of GFR-TKs and their signaling transduction pathways.

GFR-TKs are activated by ligand binding through receptor dimerization (3). It is important to mention that a subset of GFR-TKs forms oligomers even in the absence of ligand, however, receptor activation required ligand binding.

For instance, the insulin receptor (IR) and insulin like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) are expressed on the extracellular side as disulfide-linked (αβ)2 dimers (5). Structural changes within these dimeric receptors are induced by binding of insulin or IGF-1. These act on tyrosine kinase activity and cell signaling.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) binding to pre-existing oligomers of its receptor, has been proposed by several reports (6,7). But, the exact nature and size of these oligomers have not yet been identified. Furthermore, activation of certain GFR-TKs, such as Tie2 and Eph receptors, may evidently require the formation of larger oligomers (8,9). Activation of the receptor still asks for the bound ligand to stabilize a specific relationship between individual receptor molecules in an "active" dimer or oligomer, even if the "inactive" state is monomeric or oligomeric. A more accurate view of how ligand binding can induce receptor dimerization has been provided by structural studies of the GFR-TK proteins. Although its exact role is not known yet, the single membrane-spanning α helix may participate to receptor dimerization in several cases. It has also been suggested that in the ligand- receptor complex association of the cell surface domain controls the intracellular regions to form a dimeric structure which in turn stimulates the catalytic tyrosine kinase domains.

A theoretically simple mechanism for ligand-induced dimerization was suggested to be the concomitant bivalent interactions between ligand and two receptors that can facilitate the cross-linking of the receptors into a single dimeric complex. This type of receptor dimerization is proposed to be held by crystal arrangements of several pieces of the ligand-binding domains from GFR-TKs bound to their appropriate ligands. This theory is supported by molecular structure of several receptors, such as: stem cell factor receptor KIT, (10), the Flt1 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (11,12), the nerve growth factor (NGF)/neurotrophin receptor TrkA (13), Axl (14), Tie2 (8), and Eph receptors (9).

Tropomyosin-receptor-kinases and their ligands neurotrophins

Trks are part of the GFR-TK family of receptors, regulating synaptic strength and plasticity in the vertebrate nervous system (15). Like all GFR-TKs members, structure of Trks receptors consists of an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic section that have tyrosine kinase activity (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Structure of Trks Receptor.

Figure 1

In general, neuronal existence and differentiation are dependent on all Trk receptors, through numerous signal cascades (16). The oncogene trk was first identified in colon cancer, and has been reported to be activated in approximately 25% of thyroid papillary cancer (17). Its identification led to the discovery of the first member of TRKs family, the TrkA (15).

Trk receptor family is composed by three transmembrane receptors TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC (15). Trk receptors are activated by neurotrophic factors known as protein nerve growth factors or neurotrophins that are present in a family of growth factors, critically involved in the function of the nervous system (18). In addition, the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR), which belong to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, is also activated by neurotrophins (19).

Neurotrophins are involved in neuronal development, growth, and differentiation in nervous system and play an important role in neurons apoptosis (20).

The neurotrophins family is composed of four classes of neurotrophic factors: Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Neurotropin 3 (NT-3), and Neurotrophin 4/5 (NT-4/5) (18). There is a different binding affinity for each type of neurotrophin considering its corresponding Trk receptor. Binding of neurotrophin ligand to Trk leads to receptors activation, starting a signal cascades that result in promoting cell survival. The neurotrophins are produced in an immature undeveloped forms, proneurotrophins, and then changed in the final processed form, by intracellular protease cleavage. Undeveloped neurotrophins have high specificity to p75NTR. In a processed final form, neurotrophins, bind with low affinity to p75NTR and high affinity to their corresponding Trk receptors (18). Neurotrophins exercise their effect by binding to specific Trk receptors. The binding affinity of neurotrophins is specific to each Trk receptor, and generates different intracellular signaling. The differences in signaling are very important because they can generate a large variety of biological events.

There is a high affinity between TrkA and the binding nerve growth factor (NGF) (21,22). The NGF/TrkA complex undergoes internalization and endocytosis and then trafficked retrogradely from the periphery into the cell where it activates an NGF-dependent transcriptional program.

Several studies have reported that NGF binding to TrkA and p75, and both NGF/TrkA and NGF/p75 complexes, control neuronal survival, differentiation, and the level of innervation, during the development of the central and peripheral nervous system (21,22). The neurotrophin/TrkA complex promotes cell growth and survival via two major pathways: the Ras/MAPK and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathways (22,23).

Referring to TrkB, it has the highest affinity to the binding of BDNF and NT-4 (24). BDNF is a growth factor that plays important roles in the survival and function of neurons in the central nervous system. BDNF is also reported to improve the survival of neurons in the hippocampus and cortex, cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain and affects the survival and function of neurons in the central nervous system, particularly in brain regions susceptible to degeneration in Alzheimer's Disease (25). The binding of the BDNF to TrkB, activates many intercellular proteins, which control motor neurons development, survival, plasticity, and apoptosis (26). Even if both BDNF and NT-4 have high specificity to TrkB, the BDNF/ TrkB and NT-4/ TrkB complexes exercise different function in the cell (27). For example, when BDNF expression was replaced by NT-4 in a mouse model study, the mouse exhibited reduced body weight and decreased fertility (27). Data from several research studies showed that BDNF enhances the differentiation of EGF-generated neuronal precursors (28).

In the recent studies, it has been demonstrated that TrkB receptor is associated with Alzheimer's disease (26).

TrkC was reported to be activated by binding to NT-3 and to have little affinity for other ligands. NT-3 was shown to be involved in both in vivo and in vitro viability and differentiation of neurons.

It was shown that proprioceptive sensory neurons express the majority of TrkCs. In an animal model, a substantial loss of proprioceptiveness was found in NT-4 knockout mice (18). The binding affinity and specificity of Trk receptors to their neurotrophins ligands is affected by p75NTR (29). Even if the dissociation constants of p75NTR and TrkA are almost the same, their kinetics is quite different. In a study by D Esposito et al, it has been reported that the formation of high-affinity binding sites on TrkA is prevented by mutations in genes that encode the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of either TrkA or p75NTR (30). The ligands binding to p75NTR is not demanded to support high-affinity binding. The conformation of TrkA, especially the form with high-affinity binding site for NGF, is influenced by the presence of p75NTR (18).

Apart from their role in the nervous system, the Trks are also involved in cancer biology. TrkA and p75 were reported to be expressed in human colon cancer and melanoma, respectively (31,32). NGF expression was found in sarcoma and its alteration was also found in other several cancer types: neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, pancreatic carcinoma etc. (33-35).

Tropomyosin-receptor-kinase activation

The activation of Trks is induced by neurotrophins ligand binding or by transactivation, in response to G-protein coupled receptor signaling (36). In a study by Lee and Chao, it was reported that the ligands of the G-protein-coupled receptor can activate TrkA and TrkB, in the absence of NGF or BDNF (37).

Recently, Geng-Xian Shi et al. demonstrated that pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), a neuropeptide with neurotrophic and neurodevelopmental properties, was involved in Src family kinase-dependent TrkA receptor transactivation by Rit GTP-ase and contributes to PACAP-dependent neuronal differentiation (38).

Trks activation can also occur in presence of adenosine and adenosine agonists, by a mechanism involving the adenosine A2A receptor. In addition, Trks transactivation by adenosine was suggested to increase neuronal cell survival (23, 39).

The mechanism behind Trks transactivation effects is not well understood, but the ability of several receptors to activate each other, was suggested to cross-activate several intracellular signaling proteins, such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (40).

Trk signal transduction includes several proteins: SH2 containing proteins, Grb2, APS, FRS2, and phospholipase Cg (PLC-g). Trk activation by neurotrophins was also shown to induce overphosphorylation of Src, which in turn activates the PI3K/Akt and the Ras-MAPK pathways (23,25,41).

Trks activation by neurotrophin has also been reported to induce phosphorylation of phospholipase C (PLC). The breakdown of lipids to diacylglycerol and inositol (1,4,5) is catalyzed by an enzyme, induced by this phosphorylation of PLC.

PI3 kinase or other protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms may be indirectly activated by diacyglycerol, whereas the release of calcium from intracellular stores is promoted by inositol (1,4, 5) (18).

The activation of Ras family of intracellular proteins (H-Ras and K-Ras) and RAP is determined by phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the Trk receptors (18).

Two alternative MAP kinase pathways have been proved to be induced as a result of Trks activation, both of them being mediated by PI3K. In addition, PI3K activation by trk/neurothrophin complexes can also induce the activation of PDK-1 and Akt kinases pathways which, in turn, activate FRK, BAD, and GSK-3 signaling proteins (18).

The signaling pathway K-Ras, Raf1, and MEK 1,2 activates Erk 1,2 protein, while the B-Raf, MEK5, and Erk 5 pathway stimulates ERK5. It has also been reported that TrkA/NGF complex, preferential activates the Ras/MAPK pathway, while TrkC/NT3 complex activates the PI3 pathway coupling (18). The Trks activity is controlled by ubiquitination and recent studies which indicate that these receptors are differentially regulated by ubiquitination to modulate the survival of neurons (42).

After activation, Trk receptors are subjected to internalization process, undergoing axonal transport, endocytosis and finally they will be either recycled or degraded (43,44). Abnormal phosphorylation of Trks, induced by binding of neurotrophins, has been shown in several types of cancer, including CNS tumors. In vitro and in vivo evidence of Trk inhibitors efficacy in the treatment of cancer has been reported by many research groups (45-49). ❑

CONCLUSIONS

Tropomyosin-receptor-kinases are a family of transmembrane receptors with a key role in function and survival of the neurons in the central nervous system. Trks function is complex, their activation inducing many intracellular changes that regulate neuronal plasticity, neuronal regeneration and apoptosis, both in vitro and in vivo. Disregulation of Trks function has frequently been observed in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Trks are also involved in cancer biology. Trks alterations were found in several human neoplasms: neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, pancreatic carcinoma. For this reason, many pharmacological strategies have been developed to inactivate TRKs or to suppress their expression in several diseases and disorders. ❑

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

none declared.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This article was supported by UEFISCDI Romania [134/2011].

References

  • 1.Rowley JD. Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature. 1973;243:290–293. doi: 10.1038/243290a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature. 2001;411:355–365. doi: 10.1038/35077225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ullrich A, Schlessinger J. Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell. 1990;61:203–212. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2010;141:1117–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ward CW, Lawrence MC, Streltsov VA, et al. The insulin and EGF receptor structures: new insights into ligand-induced receptor activation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clayton AH, Walker F, Orchard SG, et al. Ligand-induced dimer-tetramer transition during the activation of the cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor-A multidimensional microscopy analysis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30392–30399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504770200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gadella TWJr, Jovin TM. Oligomerization of epidermal growth factor receptors on A431 cells studied by time-resolved fluorescence imaging microscopy. A stereochemical model for tyrosine kinase receptor activation. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:1543–1558. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barton WA, Tzvetkova-Robev D, Miranda EP, et al. Crystal structures of the Tie2 receptor ectodomain and the angiopoietin-2-Tie2 complex. Nat Struct Biol. 2006;13:524–532. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Himanen JP, Nikolov DB. Eph signaling: a structural view. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:46–51. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)00005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu H, Chen X, Focia PJ, et al. Structural basis for stem cell factor-KIT signaling and activation of class III receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 2007;26:891–901. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leppanen VM, Prota AE, Jeltsch M, et al. Structural determinants of growth factor binding and specificity by VEGF receptor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2425–2430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914318107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wiesmann C, Fuh G, Christinger HW, et al. Crystal structure at 1.7 A resolution of VEGF in complex with domain 2 of the Flt-1 receptor. J Cell. 1997;91:695–704. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80456-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiesmann C, Ultsch MH, Bass SH, et al. Crystal structure of nerve growth factor in complex with the ligand-binding domain of the TrkA receptor. Nature. 1999;401:184–188. doi: 10.1038/43705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sasaki T, Knyazev PG, Clout NJ, et al. Structural basis for Gas6-Axl signalling. EMBO J. 2006;25:80–87. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Trk receptors: roles in neuronal signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:609–642. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martin-Zanca D, Hughes SH, Barbacid M. A human oncogene formed by the fusion of truncated tropomyosin and protein tyrosine kinase sequences. J Nature. 1986;319:743–748. doi: 10.1038/319743a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barbacid M, Lamballe F, Pulido D, et al. The trk family of tyrosine protein kinase receptors. BBA. 1991;1072:115–127. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(91)90010-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Segal RA. Selectivity in neurotrophin signaling: theme and variations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:299–330. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hempstead BL. The many faces of p75NTR. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:260–267. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00321-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Senger DL, Campenot RB. Rapid retrograde tyrosine phosphorylation of trkA and other proteins in rat sympathetic neurons in compartmented cultures. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:411–421. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.2.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hendry IA, Stockel K, Thoenen H, et al. The retrograde axonal transport of nerve growth factor. Brain Res. 1974;68:103–121. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90536-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.DiStefano PS, Friedman B, Radziejewski C, et al. The neurotrophins BDNF, NT-3, and NGF display distinct patterns of retrograde axonal transport in peripheral and central neurons. J Neuron. 1992;8:983–993. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90213-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu rev Neurosci. 2001;24:677–736. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bronfman FC, Tcherpakov M, Jovin TM, et al. Ligand-induced internalization of the p75 neurotrophin receptor: a slow route to the signaling endosome. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3209–3220. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03209.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cotman CW, Berchtold NC. Exercise: a behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:295–301. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02143-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen Z, Simmons MS, Perry RT, et al. Genetic association of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 2 (NTRK2) With Alzheimer's disease. Am J Med Genet. 2008;147:363–369. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan G, Egles C, Sun Y, et al. Knocking the NT4 gene into the BDNF locus rescues BDNF deficient mice and reveals distinct NT4 and BDNF activities. Nature Neurosci. 2000;3:350–357. doi: 10.1038/73921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ahmed S, Reynolds BA, Weiss S. BDNF enhances the differentiation but not the survival of CNS stem cell-derived neuronal precursors. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5765–5778. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-08-05765.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yano H, Chao MV. Biochemical characterization of intracellular membranes bearing Trk neurotrophin receptors. Neurochem Res. 2005;30:767–777. doi: 10.1007/s11064-005-6870-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Esposito D, Patel P, Stephens RM, et al. The cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of the p75 and Trk A receptors regulate high affinity binding to nerve growth factor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32687–32695. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011674200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shooter EM. Early days of the nerve growth factor proteins. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:601–629. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marano N, Dietzschold B, Earley JJr, et al. Purification and amino terminal sequencing of human melanoma nerve growth factor receptor. J Neurochem. 1987;48:225–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1987.tb13151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hansen K, Wagner B, Hamel W, et al. Autophagic cell death induced by TrkA receptor activation in human glioblastoma cells. J Neurochem. 2007;103:259–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04753.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhu Z, Kleeff J, Kayed H, et al. Nerve growth factor and enhancement of proliferation, invasion, and tumorigenicity of pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2002;35:138–147. doi: 10.1002/mc.10083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Greco A, Miranda C, Pierotti MA. Rearrangements of NTRK1 gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Moll Cell Endocrinog. 2010;321:44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Daub H, Weiss FU, Wallasch C, et al. Role of transactivation of the EGF receptor in signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors. J Nature. 1996;379:557–560. doi: 10.1038/379557a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee FS, Rajagopal R, Chao MV. Distinctive features of Trk neurotrophin receptor transactivation by G protein-coupled receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002;13:11–17. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(01)00024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shi GX, Jin L, Andres DA. Src-dependent TrkA transactivation is required for pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38-mediated Rit activation and neuronal differentiation. Moll Biol Cell. 2010;21:1597–1608. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rajagopal R, Chen ZY, Lee FS, et al. Transactivation of Trk neurotrophin receptors by G-protein-coupled receptor ligands occurs on intracellular membranes. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6650–6658. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0010-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wetzker R, Bohmer FD. Transactivation joins multiple tracks to the ERK/MAPK cascade. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2003;4:651–657. doi: 10.1038/nrm1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jin W, Yun C, Jeong J, et al. c-Src is required for tropomyosin receptor kinase C (TrkC)-induced activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1391–1400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705052200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arevalo JC, Waite J, Rajagopal R, et al. Cell survival through Trk neurotrophin receptors is differentially regulated by ubiquitination. J Neuron. 2006;50:549–559. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ginty DD, Segal RA. Retrograde neurotrophin signaling: Trk-ing along the axon. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002;12:268–274. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00326-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Haglund K, Di Fiore PP, Dikic I. Distinct monoubiquitin signals in receptor endocytosis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:598–603. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamashita T, Tohyama M. The p75 receptor acts as a displacement factor that releases Rho from Rho-GDI. Nature Neurosci. 2003;6:461–467. doi: 10.1038/nn1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jones LW, Haykowsky M, Peddle CJ, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile of patients with HER2/neu-positive breast cancer treated with anthracycline-taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab. Cancer Epidemol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1026–1031. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Miknyoczki SJ, Chang H, Klein-Szanto A, et al. The Trk tyrosine kinase inhibitor CEP-701 (KT-5555) exhibits significant antitumor efficacy in preclinical xenograft models of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 1999;5:2205–2212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Festuccia C, Muzi P, Gravina GL, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor CEP-701 blocks the NTRK1/NGF receptor and limits the invasive capability of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Int J Oncol. 2007;30:193–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Weeraratna AT, Dalrymple SL, Lamb JC, et al. Pan-trk inhibition decreases metastasis and enhances host survival in experimental models as a result of its selective induction of apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. Clinical Cancer Research. 2001;7:2237–2245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mædica are provided here courtesy of Amaltea Medical, Editura Magister

RESOURCES