Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2013 Jul 26;14:509. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-509

KEGG orthology-based annotation of the predicted proteome of Acropora digitifera: ZoophyteBase - an open access and searchable database of a coral genome

Walter C Dunlap 1,2, Antonio Starcevic 4, Damir Baranasic 4, Janko Diminic 4, Jurica Zucko 4, Ranko Gacesa 4, Madeleine JH van Oppen 1, Daslav Hranueli 4, John Cullum 5, Paul F Long 2,3,
PMCID: PMC3750612  PMID: 23889801

Abstract

Background

Contemporary coral reef research has firmly established that a genomic approach is urgently needed to better understand the effects of anthropogenic environmental stress and global climate change on coral holobiont interactions. Here we present KEGG orthology-based annotation of the complete genome sequence of the scleractinian coral Acropora digitifera and provide the first comprehensive view of the genome of a reef-building coral by applying advanced bioinformatics.

Description

Sequences from the KEGG database of protein function were used to construct hidden Markov models. These models were used to search the predicted proteome of A. digitifera to establish complete genomic annotation. The annotated dataset is published in ZoophyteBase, an open access format with different options for searching the data. A particularly useful feature is the ability to use a Google-like search engine that links query words to protein attributes. We present features of the annotation that underpin the molecular structure of key processes of coral physiology that include (1) regulatory proteins of symbiosis, (2) planula and early developmental proteins, (3) neural messengers, receptors and sensory proteins, (4) calcification and Ca2+-signalling proteins, (5) plant-derived proteins, (6) proteins of nitrogen metabolism, (7) DNA repair proteins, (8) stress response proteins, (9) antioxidant and redox-protective proteins, (10) proteins of cellular apoptosis, (11) microbial symbioses and pathogenicity proteins, (12) proteins of viral pathogenicity, (13) toxins and venom, (14) proteins of the chemical defensome and (15) coral epigenetics.

Conclusions

We advocate that providing annotation in an open-access searchable database available to the public domain will give an unprecedented foundation to interrogate the fundamental molecular structure and interactions of coral symbiosis and allow critical questions to be addressed at the genomic level based on combined aspects of evolutionary, developmental, metabolic, and environmental perspectives.

Keywords: Acropora digitifera, KEGG orthology, Database, Annotation, Proteome, Genome, Coral, Symbiosis, Cnidaria

Background

All of the reef-building corals (Scleractinia; phylum Cnidaria) that create the vast calcium carbonate deposits of coral reefs have evolved an endosymbiotic partnership with photosynthetic dinoflagellates of the genus Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae), commonly known as zooxanthellae, which reside within the gastrodermal cells of their scleractinian host [1-3]. Coral-algal symbiosis is a cooperative metabolic adaptation necessary for survival in the shallow oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) waters of tropical and subtropical marine environments [4,5] that drives the productivity of coral reefs [6]. Coral reefs provide habitat and trophic support for many thousands of marine species, the richness of which rival the biological biodiversity of tropical rainforests [7]. Underlying the basic requirements of corals for growth, reproduction and survival are special needs to accommodate symbiont-specific host recognition, to control innate and responsive immune systems, and what is likely to emerge from future research is the extent to which the host is involved in direct regulation of its endosymbiont populations. Much is understood about the cellular biology of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis (reviewed in [8]), but less is known at the molecular level of coral symbiology. There is little opposition to the contention that environmental and anthropogenic disturbances are causing alarming losses to coral reefs ([9] and reference therein). Threats to productivity are being imposed by the disruption of coral symbiosis (apparent as “coral bleaching”) caused in response to increasing thermal stress attributed to global warming [10,11], from an increase in stress-related coral disease [12-14], from the discharge of domestic and industrial wastes, pollutants from agricultural development and the transport of sediments in terrestrial runoff [15,16], and potentially from imminent declines in coral calcification owing to rising ocean acidification [17-19]. Accordingly, we require a better understanding of the molecular stress responses and adaptive potential of corals. Such information is necessary to predict bleaching events and so better inform effective management policies for the conservation of coral reef ecosystems [20-24].

To understand how coral holobionts respond to environmental change at the molecular level, the identification of genes that may respond by transcription to stress is of primary importance [25]. Thus, the use of transcriptomic methodologies to identify stress-responsive genes has been highly successful [26-32]. Transcriptome high-throughput profiling has allowed changes in gene expression across thousands of genes to be measured simultaneously. Fuelled by data-generating power, the number of coral based studies utilising transcriptomics to investigate molecular responses to environmental stressors has expanded greatly by the acquisition of expressed sequence tag (EST) gene libraries, the fabrication of microarray biochips used to estimate levels of mRNA expression, and by direct analysis using next-generation, high-throughput sequencing. However, much of this work has been conducted using the aposymbiotic state of pre-settlement coral larvae, so transcribed genes relevant to metamorphosis and the cytobiology of the adult polyp are limited to a few recent studies [33-36]. The transcriptome additionally does not provide the structural framework and essential regulatory elements of the functional genome for comprehensive evaluation. Recently, deep metatranscriptomic sequencing of two adult coral holobiomes has been made available on searchable databases: PocilloporaBase for Pocillopora damicornis[36] and PcarnBase for Platygyra carnosus[37]. In contrast, high-throughput metaproteomic analyses to quantify the product yield of stress-response genes of the coral holobiome are yet to be widely adopted by the coral reef scientific community, despite the proteome being the ultimate measure of the coral phenotype [38,39].

The early accumulation of transcriptomic data revealed that a small proportion of coral ESTs matched genes known previously only from other kingdoms of life, implying that the ancestral animal genome contained many genes traditionally regarded as ‘non-animal’ that have been lost from most animal genomes [40]. Furthermore, an unexpected revelation from EST data is the greater extent to which coral sequences resemble human genes than those of the Drosophila and Caenorhabditis model invertebrate genomes [41,42]. Comparative genomic analysis has revealed higher genetic divergence and massive gene loss within the ecdysozoan lineages. Hence, many genes assumed to have much later evolutionary origins are likely to have been present in an ancestral or early-diverged metazoan [43]. While much of the animal kingdom remains yet to be explored, examples of the metazoan phylum Cnidaria provide a unique insight into the deep evolutionary origins of at least some vertebrate gene families [42]. Thus, the complete genomic sequence of a coral is likely to reveal many genes previously assumed to be strictly vertebrate innovations. To date, cnidarian genomes have been published for the sea anemone N. vectensis[42] and the hydroid Hydra magnipapillata[44]. Only the coral genome of Acropora digitifera is available without restriction on use of its published sequence [45], but the compiled sequence has not been fully annotated. At the time of this writing, the genome assembly of Acropora millepora has been released to the public domain [46], also without full annotation, but an embargo is imposed on use of this data that is highly restrictive to the progress of further studies. Understanding how genomic variation affects molecular and organismal biology is the ultimate justification of genome sequencing, and annotation is an essential step in this process. We envisage that unrestricted access to annotation of the A. digitifera genome will provide an unprecedented foundation to freely interrogate the generic molecular structure, possible endobiotic interactions and the response of coral to environmental stress. Accordingly, we offer annotation of the predicted proteome of A. digitifera on the open access and searchable database, ZoophyteBase [47]. Use of the ZoophyteBase search engines will allow genes of encoded proteins to be identified that can be examined in context of the cellular physiology, processes of ecological significance, the evolutionary and developmental biology of corals and the functional metabolism of the holobiont that collectively underpin the health of coral reefs.

Construction and content

ZoophyteBase is an open access and searchable database of complete annotation of the predicted proteome of the coral A. digitifera[48]. It was constructed using the MEGGASENSE system, which is a general system for constructing annotation databases with different sorts of input data (DNA reads, assembled genomes, predicted proteomes) and the possibility of using different combinations of analysis tools to create the annotation (Gacesa et al, in preparation). In the case of ZoophyteBase, hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles [49] were chosen as the annotation tool rather than the more common BLAST searches [50]. HMM profiles are constructed from multiple alignments of protein families and contain information about conserved differences in amino acid residues as well as deletions and insertions [49]. This is particularly important for a coral database, as corals are evolutionarily distant to most other organisms. This means that known homologous sequences present in the databases will usually have relatively low similarity, making BLAST searches inaccurate. The statistical information in an HMM profile gives more sensitive and accurate detection of sequence homology. An additional advantage of HMM profiles is that the statistical significance of hits (the expected value) is much more accurate than that calculated by BLAST programs.

The quality of sequence annotation is limited by the accuracy of information provided in any database used. It is well known that there are many problems with annotation in the large uncurated databases such as the NCBI GenBank nr sequences. Widely accepted, the most accurate database for functional annotation is the KEGG database [51]. The KEGG database organises sequences as groups of KEGG orthologues. These are sets of homologous sequences from as wide a range of organisms as possible having an assigned molecular function. These functions are arranged in a hierarchical fashion and grouped in biological pathways. The sequences belonging to KEGG orthologues were used to construct HMM profiles for annotating the coral sequences. Accordingly, the 23,524 predicted proteins encoded in the coral genome were analysed using HMM profiles. If a protein showed a highly significant correlation (“hit”) to a single HMM profile, this was used to create a “trusted” annotation of the sequence. Choosing a cut-off for this criterion is not trivial, because longer sequences tend to have more significant e-values. For construction of ZoophyteBase the criterion 1e-5 was used. This resulted in 19,044 predicted proteins giving “trusted” sequence annotation. For many of these proteins there were two or more highly significant hits to established HMM profiles. In these cases, the most significant correlation was used to construct our “best-fit” annotation file, but other hits can be viewed by the database user so that expert knowledge can be employed to override the automatic annotation function. In 8,004 out of 19,044 predicted proteins which were annotated, more than one annotation was assigned based on non-overlapping regions within the protein which were used to construct the “best-fit” annotation file. We interpreted these as “fusion” events generated by the in silico protein prediction method used, and these proteins were treated as multiple instead of single encoded proteins. Hence, this analysis resulted in the annotation of 33,195 proteins in total, generated from the original 23,524 predicted coral proteins. This is a very conservative annotation scheme, so it can be assumed that most of the annotations are biologically meaningful. Almost 81% (19,044 out of 23,524) of the predicted proteome was assigned using this method.

Utility

The MEGGASENSE system was used to generate a web interface for ZoophyteBase. The home page (Figure 1A) allows the use of several functions. A text version of the entire annotation can be downloaded for manual inspection. There is a proteome overview that gives statistics about the database and a breakdown of the annotated functions into different categories of genes. A particularly useful feature of ZoophyteBase is the ability to use text queries employing a search engine that provides a relevant inquiry in the absence of an exact match between key words of a search and those described for a functional protein. The search engine uses text from the KEGG-database, PubMed and other sources to establish links between query words to access protein data using an intelligent Google-like search engine implemented by the search platform Lucene/Solr [52]. This helps to overcome the common problem that different terminology is used by different groups of researchers. The use of this search function is illustrated by using the query “phagocytosis” (Figure 1B). This inquiry finds 42 hits to KEGG orthologue profiles. One of the hits corresponds to amphiphysin (a synaptic vesicle protein) with annotation of two protein homologues encoded in the coral genome. On the data page there is a brief description of the function of amphiphysin together with a PUBMED literature reference. The sequences of the predicted coral proteins (Figure 1C) can be retrieved, and it is also possible to analyse such data with computer aided drug design methods [53] to look for conserved domains. There are also two tools for the user to examine matches to protein sequences. The user can carry out a BLAST search against the coral protein sequence or analyse the predicted sequence against HMM profiles used to annotate the coral proteome. These tools require only the user to paste their queury into the sequence window.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Graphical overview of the user-web interface for ZoophyteBase during a typical search. The home page allows several search functions (A). Text queries using an intelligent Google-like search engine is illustrated by using the query “phagocytosis” (B). This finds 42 hits to KEGG orthologue profiles. One of the hits corresponds to amphiphysin with annotation of two protein homologues encoded in the coral genome. On the data page there is a brief description of the function of amphiphysin together with a PUBMED literature reference. The sequences of the predicted coral proteins can be retrieved (C).

In this manuscript we demonstrate the utility of ZoophyteBase by presenting predicted gene-encoded proteins revealed by annotation of the A. digitifera genome that have physiological, biological and environmental significance. We discuss features of importance in coral physiology: (1) regulatory proteins of symbiosis, (2) planula and early developmental proteins, (3) neural messengers, receptors and sensory proteins, (4) calcification and Ca2+-signalling proteins, (5) plant-derived proteins, (6) proteins of nitrogen metabolism, (7) DNA repair proteins, (8) stress response proteins, (9) antioxidant and redox-protective proteins, (10) proteins of cellular apoptosis, (11) microbial symbioses and pathogenicity proteins, (12) proteins of viral pathogenicity, (13) toxins and venom, (14) proteins of the chemical defencesome and (15) coral epigenetics.

Discussion

Regulatory proteins of symbiosis

Metabolic cooperation is a key feature of coral-algal symbiosis that allows reef-building corals to inhabit the often nutrient-poor waters of tropical oceans [54]. In this phototropic symbiosis, fixed carbon produced by resident algae is released to the host for nutrition, and the algal symbionts benefit by acquiring the inorganic nutrient wastes of host metabolism [2,55]. The symbiotic dinoflagellates reside and proliferate within a specialised phagosome (the symbiosome) maintained within host gastrodermal cells. This arrangement requires complex biochemical coordination by the coral at various metabolic stages that includes endocytosis (phagocytosis) by post-settlement polyps to acquire algal symbionts, accord symbiosome recognition to arrest phagosomal maturation for sustained organelle homeostasis, activate symbiophagy or exocytosis to eliminate damaged symbionts [56,57], and regulate apoptotic or exocytotic pathways to remove excess or impaired populations, all of which have long been recognised as essential to preserve the stability of coral symbiosis [58]. Although these processes are poorly understood in corals, it has been realised from studies of the sea anemone Aiptasia pulchella, a related anthozoan also containing Symbiodinium sp. endosymbionts, that the persistence of algal-containing symbiosomes in Cnidaria relies on the exclusion or retention of small Rab GTPase family proteins that are key regulatory components of vesicular trafficking and membrane fusion in eukaryotic cells [59]. Significantly, ApRab3 and ApRab4 accumulate in the biogenesis of maturing symbiosomes of A. pulchella[60,61], and mature symbiosomes enveloping healthy dinoflagellates have tethered ApRab5 [62], a checkpoint antagonist of downstream ApRab7 and ApRab11 proteins that would otherwise direct autophagy of the symbiont cargo [63,64].

Our annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals sequences encoding putative Rab homologues of the Ras superfamily of proteins (Table 1). In a comparison of cnidarian Rab proteins, eight proteins of A. digitifera matched homologues of Aiptasia pulchella, twenty-nine matched proteins encoded by the aposymbiotic freshwater H. magnipapillata and the aposymbiotic anemone N. vectensis genomes, while seven Rab and Rab-interacting proteins of A. digitifera did not match other cnidarian proteins (Table 2). Significantly, the eight homologues of A. digitifera that matched exclusively Rab proteins of A. pulchella included homologues of the aforementioned ApRab3, ApRab4 and ApRab5 proteins attributed to the maintenance of healthy symbiosomes in Aiptasia, while homologues of the autophagic ApRab7 and ApRab11 proteins are found also in N. vectensis. While Rab GTPase proteins and their effector proteins coordinate consecutive stages of endocytic vesicular transport [65,66], soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins are essential for Rab assembly to complete endosomal fusion of vesicle membranes [67], a process by which Rab proteins impart specificity by binding distinct Rab and SNARE partner proteins prior to membrane fusion [68]. Genes encoding syntaxin-like SNARE proteins have been unambiguously identified [69] from coral EST database libraries constructed from expressed mRNA isolated from various early life stages of Acropora aspera, A. millepora, A. palmata and Orbicella faveolata (= Monastraea faveolata), as well as from the genome of the sea anemone N. vectensis[70]. In metazoans, vacuolar r-SNARE receptor proteins comprise the syntaxin, synaptobrevin and VAMP family proteins, of which there are eight syntaxin and syntaxin-binding proteins (plus two plant-like syntaxins). Additionally, there are one t-SNARE target protein to direct vacuolar morphogenesis, two synaptosomal proteins, one synaptosomal complex ZIP1 protein (yeast homologue), one synaptobrevin membrane protein of secretory vesicles, ten vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMPs), a vacuolar protein-8 regulator of autophagy, four vacuolar-sorting proteins and two SEC22 vesicle trafficking protein encoded in the genome of A. digitifera (Table 1), many of which may interact to provide metabolic transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus [71]. Included in this vast but yet unexplored repertoire of vacuolar-acting proteins are the syntaxin-binding amisyn and tomosyn regulators of SNARE complex assembly and disassembly [72,73], which may control membrane fusion in the phagocytic establishment and dis-sociation of coral symbiosis.

Table 1.

Regulatory proteins of symbiosis in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.06849
K06110
Exocyst complex component 3
v1.00063; v1.01826
K06111
Exocyst complex component 4
v1.06336; v1.06337; v1.15354
K07195
Exocyst complex component 7
v1.04340 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K14966
Host cell factor
v1.01629; v1.19166
K12481
Rabenosyn-5
v1.18447 [+ 26 other sequence copies]
K07976
Rab family, other (similar to Rab-6B)
v1.02380
K12480
Rab GTPase-binding effector protein-1
v1.01032
K13883
Rab-interacting lysosomal protein
v1.14682; v1.03256; v1.07709
K12484
Rab11 family-interacting protein-1/2/5
v1.13055; v1.13176; v1.16348
K12485
Rab11 family-interacting protein-3/4
v1.01275
K07932
Rab-like protein-2B
v1.17629 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K07933
Rab-like protein-3
v1.03299; v1.09653
K07934
Rab-like protein-4
v1.08498
K07935
Rab-like protein-5
v1.16155 [+5 other sequence copies
K07874
Ras-related protein Rab-1A
v1.09098
K07875
Ras-related protein Rab-1B
v1.13558; v1.08983
K07877
Ras-related protein Rab-2A
v1.14260
K07878
Ras-related protein Rab-2B
v1.07500; v1.20532; v1.07498
K07884
Ras-related protein Rab-3D
v1.21242; v1.07502
K07880
Ras-related protein Rab-4B
v1.01341; v1.05619
K07888
Ras-related protein Rab-5B
v1.07125
K07889
Ras-related protein Rab-5C
v1.09239
K07893
Ras-related protein Rab-6A
v1.10443; v1.13335
K07897
Ras-related protein Rab-7A
v1.03086; v1.17122; v1.07231
K07916
Ras-related protein Rab-7 L1
v1.02275 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K07901
Ras-related protein Rab-8A
v1.24612
K07899
Ras-related protein Rab-9A
v1.00411
K07900
Ras-related protein Rab-9B
v1.10697; v1.01515
K07903
Ras-related protein Rab-10
v1.22278; v1.04408; v1.12528
K07905
Ras-related protein Rab-11B
v1.07033; v1.23028
K07881
Ras-related protein Rab-14
v1.02275
K07908
Ras-related protein Rab-15
v1.16455; v1.14911; v1.14959
K07910
Ras-related protein Rab-18
v1.04714
K07911
Ras-related protein Rab-20
v1.01878; v1.12184
K07890
Ras-related protein Rab-21
v1.09930
K06234
Ras-related protein Rab-23
v1.13579; v1.12841
K07912
Ras-related protein Rab-24
v1.10183
K07913
Ras-related protein Rab-26
v1.08199
K07885
Ras-related protein Rab-27A
v1.13978; v1.18893
K07917
Ras-related protein Rab-30
v1.03085; v1.06007; v1.07729
K07918
Ras-related protein Rab-32
v1.24721
K07919
Ras-related protein Rab-33A
v1.18892
K07920
Ras-related protein Rab-33B
v1.16060
K07876
Ras-related protein Rab-35
v1.15894
K07922
Ras-related protein Rab-36
v1.03080
K07923
Ras-related protein Rab-38
v1.21391
K07924
Ras-related protein Rab-39A
v1.14786
K07928
Ras-related protein Rab-40
v1.05611 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K08502
Regulator of vacuolar morphogenesis (t-SNARE domain)
v1.18253
K08520
SEC22 vesicle trafficking protein A/C
v1.15499
K13814
t-SNARE domain-containing protein 1
v1.05749
K08516
Synaptobrevin homologue YKT6
v1.13229
K12768
Synaptonemal complex protein ZIP1
v1.16533; v1.17141
K08508
Synaptosomal-associated protein, 23 kDa
v1.05301
K08509
Synaptosomal-associated protein, 29 kDa
v1.19071
K04560
Syntaxin 1A
v1.04614; v1.22747
K08486
Syntaxin 1B/2/3
v1.16462
K08490
Syntaxin 5
v1.20758; v1.21534
K08498
Syntaxin 6
v1.22836; v1.15499
K08488
Syntaxin 7
v1.01959; v1.24227
K08501
Syntaxin 8
v1.02007; v1.06683; v1.12727
K08491
Syntaxin 17
v1.21308; v1.11830; v1.01582
K08492
Syntaxin 18
v1.22100; v1.09457
K08518
Syntaxin binding protein 5 (tomosyn)
v1.18555
K08519
Syntaxin binding protein 6 (amisyn)
v1.12938
K08500
Syntaxin of plants SYP6
v1.06575
K08506
Syntaxin of plants SYP7
v1.14699
K08507
Unconventional SNARE in the endoplasmic reticulum protein 1
v1.23782 [+ 38 other sequence copies]
K08332
Vacuolar protein 8
v1.15282; v1.24603; v1.01672
K12196
Vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 4
v1.17791 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K12479
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 45
v1.20907
K11664
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 72
v1.15996 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K12199
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein VTA1
v1.15614
K08510
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 1 (synaptobrevin)
v1.13353
K13504
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (synaptobrevin)
v1.12458; v1.07528
K13505
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 3 (cellubrevin)
v1.19735; v1.21831; v1.07186
K08513
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 4 (Golgi transport)
v1.05299
K08514
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 5 (exocytosis)
v1.13557; v1.24610
K08515
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (exocytosis)
v1.12279
K08512
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (endobrevin)
v1.00261; v1.08699; v1.04334
K06096
Vesicle-associated membrane protein A
v1.20177
K10707
Vesicle-associated membrane protein B
v1.15472; v1.03568
K06027
Vesicle-fusing ATPase
v1.11431; v1.10487
K08517
Vesicle transport protein SEC22
v1.06393; v1.13003; v1.08735; v1.04261 K08493 Vesicle transport interaction with t-SNAREs 1

Table 2.

Distribution of Rab homologues of Aiptasia puchella, Hydra magnipapillata and Nematostella vectensis in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

A. digitiferaRab protein Cnidarian encoding Rab homologue
Rab-like protein- 2B, Rab-2B Rab-3D, Rab-4B, Rab-5B, Rab-26, Rab-32, Rab-38
A. puchella
Rab-like protein-3, Rab-36
N. vectensis
Rab-2A, Rab-23
A. puchella, H. magnipapillata
Rab-like protein-6B, Rab-6A, Rab-7 L1, Rab-10, Rab11B, Rab-30, Rab-33B
A. puchella, N. vectensis
Rab effector protein-1, Rab11-interacting protein-3/4
H. magnipapillata, N. vectensis
Rab-like protein-4, Rab-like protein-5, Rab-1A, Rab5C, Rab-7A, Rab-8A, Rab-9A, Rab-14, Rab-18, Rab-20, Rab-21, Rab-24, Rab-27A, Rab-35
A. puchella, H. magnipapillata, N. vectensis
Rab-interacting lysomal protein, Rab11-interacting protein-1/2/5, Rab-1B, Rab-9B, Rab-3A, Rab-39A, Rab-40 No match

In the final step of exocytosis there is a cytosolic influx of calcium which binds to synaptotagmin to actuate completion of membrane SNARE protein assembly with exocytic docking to form the conducting channel for trans-membrane vesicular transport on activation by vesicle-fusing ATPase [74]. As synaptotagmin proteins are not included in the KEGG database, Zoophytebase was used for BLAST searches with all known synaptotagamin sequences [27]. Synaptotagamin proteins from A. digitifera were found having similarity to homologues from diverse invertebrate and vertebrate organisms, including one from the human genome (Table 3). Other Ca2+-sensing proteins of A. digitifera, such as calmodulin and the calcium binding protein CML, are given with calcification and Ca2+-signalling proteins.

Table 3.

Synaptotagmin proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence GenBank Accession Genome encoded homologue
v1.08623
GI:268530614
Caenorhabditis briggsae: XP_002630433 (worm)
v1.20682; v1.10560; v1.02080; v1.10015
GI:150416761
Platynereis dumerilii: ABR68850 (worm)
v1.10269; v1.04412
GI:288869516
Nasonia vitripennis: NP_001165865 (wasp)
v1.01508
GI:29378331
Lymnaea stagnalis: AA093847 (snail)
v1.18613
GI:391339919
Metaseiulus occidentalis: XP_003744294 (mite)
v1.07402
GI:260834895
Branchiostoma floridae: XP_002612445 (lancelet)
v1.01542
GI:149067023
Rattus norvegicus: EDM16756 (rat)
v1.20683
GI:383860584
Megachile rotundata: XP_003705769 (bee)
v1.17688
GI:48529130
Oreochromis niloticus; XP_003452067 (fish)
v1.15777; v1.14902
GI:269785031
Saccoglossus kowalevskii: NP_001161667 (worm)
v1.17175; v1.11521
GI:11559313
Halocynthia roretzi: BAB18864 (ascidian)
v.1.03344; v1.03345
GI:12658419
Manduca sexta; AF331039 (moth)
v1.16152
GI:395729192
Pongo abelii: XP_003780414 (orangutan)
v1.10268
GI:327283049
Anolis carolinensis: XP_003226254 (lizard)
v10.2778
GI:125984480
Drosophila pseudoobscura XP_001356004.1 (fly)
v1.02083; v1.02777
GI:226490194
Schistosoma japonicum: CAX69339.1 (fluke)
v1.04326
GI:167744962
Homo sapiens: 2R83_A (human)
v1.14682; v1.04180 GI:241704658 Ixodes scapularis: XP_002411967 (tick)

Intriguingly, annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals a host cell factor (K14966), but this is not related to the elusive “host factor” of symbiosis demonstrated to be present in tissue homogenates of corals and other marine invertebrates that harbor Symbiodinium spp. endosymbionts [75-77]. Instead, this mammalian transcriptional coactivator host cell factor (HFC-1) is known to mediate the enhancer-promoter assemblies of herpes simplex (HSV) and varicella zoster (VZV) viruses for activation of the latent state for replication [78], such that the coral HCF homologue may have similar relevance as a viral checkpoint transcriptional coactivator of virulence in A. digitifera. HCF-1 expression is coupled also to chromatin modification [79,80] suggesting that the coral protein homologue may have an additional role in epigenetic reprogramming of the chromatin histone-DNA complex at different stages of development.

Planula and early developmental proteins

In this section we discuss predicted proteins encoded in the A. digitifera genome having functional homology to known proteins are specific to early embryonic development, planula larvae function and morphogenesis, which are given in Table 4. Annotation of the coral genome reveals a large set of homeobox proteins involved in the regulation of anatomical development during morphogenesis. The homeobox is a highly conserved DNA sequence (homeodomain) within genes that binds to DNA in a sequence-specific manner [81] often at the promoter region of their target gene to affect transcription in the developing embryo. Amonst these transcriptional regulators, Hox genes are essential to metazoan development as their expressed proteins differentiate embryonic regions along the anterior-posterior axis (the Hox code) and are recognised for their contribution to the evolution of morphological diversity [82]. Hox genes are well characterised in cnidarians and, given their importance in embryonic development, it is not surprising that molecular evidence from the Cnidaria reveal that the genetic origins of Hox genes predate the cnidarian-bilaterian divergence [83-85] yet had evolved after divergence of the sponge and eumetazoan lineages [86]. Hox genes of cnidarians are typically located in a conserved genomic collinear cluster, which is apparent also for A. digitifera, whereby the order of the genes on the chromosome is the same as that of gene expression in the developing embryo. Included in our annotation are genes encoding two LIM homeobox proteins and a LIM homeobox transcription factor (Lhx) having conserved roles in neuronal development [87], which in N. vectensis are responsible for the development of neural networks in developing larvae and juvenile polyps [88]. Unlike N. vectensis[89], the coral genome expresses a homeobox BarH-like protein that in vertebrates directs neurogenesis [90]. Distinct from homeodomain proteins, but serving similar functions, are various protein activators, regulators and receptors of cellular morphogenesis. Annotation of the coral genome has revealed multiple sequence alignments to a protein homologue of the dishevelled-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (Daam1) that initiates cytoskeleton formation via the control of actin assembly. Daam1 was found crucial for gastrulation in Xenopus[91], wherein Daam1 mutants of Drosophilia exhibit trachea defects [92], and in mammals Daam1 is highly expressed in multiple developing organs and is deemed essential for cardiac morphogenesis [93]. Similar morphogenetic genes express regulatory proteins that are necessary for vacuole biogenesis in yeasts [94]. Others express bone morphogenetic proteins (and their BMP receptors), which are potent multi-functional growth activators that belong to the transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) cytokine superfamily of proteins that in humans have various functions during embryogenesis, skeletal formation, neurogenesis and haematopoiesis [95]. However, since many of the homeobox and morgenetic proteins (Table 4) are homologues of proteins with functions ascribed to higher organisms, their precise function in A. digitifera cannot be ascertained by KEGG orthology alone.

Table 4.

Planula and early developmental proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.09797; v1.11180; v1.08414
K03776
Aerotaxis receptor (oxygen sensing)
v1.07838 [+5 other sequence copies]
K07822
Archaeal flagellar protein FlaC
v1.14039; v1.11310; v1.11309
K05502
Bone morphogenetic protein 1
v1.01025; v1.17008; v1.15796; v1.23658
K04662
Bone morphogenetic protein 2/4
v1.02299; v1.07696; v1.10675
K04663
Bone morphogenetic protein 5/6/7/8
v1.06335; v1.01763
K04673
Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-1A
v1.13481
K13578
Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-1B
v1.10550 [+4 other sequence copies]
K04671
Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-2
v1.00912 [+4 other sequence copies]
K13579
Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-1, invertebrate
v1.19370
K14624
C-C motif chemokine 2
v1.23163
K12499
C-C motif chemokine 5
v1.08576
K05511
C-C motif chemokine 15/23
v1.09229
K05512
C-C motif chemokine 19/21
v1.09305
K08373
C-C chemokine receptor-like 2
v1.04942
K04179
C-C chemokine receptor type 4
v1.02658
K04245
Chemokine-like receptor 1
v1.21300
K12671
C-X-C motif chemokine 10
v1.16396; v1.21991
K10035
C-X-C motif chemokine 16
v1.23712
K11522
Chemotaxis family two-component system response regulator PixG
v1.09435
K13490
Chemotaxis family, histidine kinase sensor response regulator (WspE-like)
v1.14142; v1.05300
K05874
Chemotaxis protein I, serine sensor receptor (MCP family)
v1.07361
K05877
Chemotaxis protein IV, peptide sensor receptor (MCP family)
v1.17411
K03414
Chemotaxis protein CheZ
v1.16104
K00575
Chemotaxis protein methyltransferase CheR
v1.15537 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K08482
Circadian clock protein KaiC
v1.14925 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K02223
Circadian locomoter output cycles kaput protein
v1.06432 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K04512
Dishevelled associated activator of morphogenesis
v1.17637 [+ 70 other sequence copies]
K10408
Dynein heavy chain, axonemal
v1.00202 [+5 other sequence copies]
K10409
Dynein intermediate chain 1, axonemal
v1.04986; v1.09649; v1.23645
K11143
Dynein intermediate chain 2, axonemal
v1.08695; v1.09481; v1.23153
K10411
Dynein light chain 1, axonemal
v1.11684
K10412
Dynein light chain 4, axonemal
v1.23322; v1.01131; v1.04207
K10410
Dynein light intermediate chain, axonemal
v1.14083
K02401
Flagellar biosynthetic protein FlhB
v1.16997
K02420
Flagellar biosynthetic protein FliQ
v1.02867
K02396
Flagellar hook-associated protein 1 FlgK
v1.18101; v1.13427
K02408
Flagellar hook-basal body complex protein FliE
v1.04339; v1.07633
K06603
Flagellar protein FlaG
v1.17895[+5 other sequence copies]
K02383
Flagellar protein FlbB
v1.21111
K02413
Flagellar protein FliJ
v1.17651 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K02415
Flagellar protein FliL
v1.01971 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K02418
Flagellar protein FliO/FliZ
v1.14031
K02423
Flagellar protein FliT
v1.08025
K02394
Flagellar P-ring protein precursor FlgI
v1.02396; v1.15777
K02409
Flagellar M-ring protein FliF
v1.20693
K09451
Homeobox protein aristaless-like 4
v1.24732 [+5 other sequence copies]
K09452
Homeobox protein aristaless-related
v1.15788; v1.19334; v1.04164
K09313
Homeobox protein cut-like
v1.01801
K09319
Homeobox protein engrailed
v1.16835; v1.06323
K09320
Homeobox even-skipped homologue protein
v1.0412; v1.054771
K09354
Homeobox protein expressed in ES cells 1
v1.13604
K09324
Homeobox protein goosecoid
v1.06346; v1.08163
K09325
Homeobox protein goosecoid-like
v1.17295; v1.17294
K09361
Homeobox protein, BarH-like (vertebrate neurogenesis)
v1.07457
K09316
Homeobox protein DLX, invertebrate
v1.11157; v1.08573; v1.15250
K09317
Homeobox protein EMX
v1.01800
K09321
Homeobox protein GBX
v1.10929; v1.06346; v1.05443; v1.07458
K09310
Homeobox protein GSH
v1.13684; v1.24444
K08025
Homeobox protein HB9
v1.16254; v1.16064
K08024
Homeobox protein HEX
v1.07458; v1.06706; v1.06705
K09339
Homeobox protein HLX1
v1.06347; v1.06348; v1.17294
K09302
Homeobox protein HoxA/B2
v1.06125
K09306
Homeobox protein HoxA/B/C6
v1.19818
K09304
Homeobox protein HoxA/B/C/D4
v1.06706
K09301
Homeobox protein HoxA/B/D1
v1.02056
K09353
Homeobox protein LBX
v1.06347; v1.06348
K09328
Homeobox protein Unc-4
v1.24342; v1.04552
K09318
Homeobox protein ventral anterior
v1.03823; v1.10070; v1.04435
K09309
Homeobox protein Nkx-1
v1.12852 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K08029
Homeobox protein Nkx-2.2
v1.21630
K09345
Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5
v1.10625
K09347
Homeobox protein Nkx-2.8
v1.10625; v1.13865; v1.05476
K09348
Homeobox protein Nkx-3.1
v1.21628; v1.05475; v1.05477
K09995
Homeobox protein Nkx-3.2
v1.06135; v1.10071
K09349
Homeobox protein Nkx-5
v1.14702
K08030
Homeobox protein Nkx-6.1
v1.14917; v1.11907
K09350
Homeobox protein Nkx-6.2
v1.00777; v1.21453
K09322
Homeobox protein MOX
v1.00602 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K09326
Homeobox protein OTX
v1.16722; v1.12785
K09374
LIM homeobox protein 3/4
v1.11281; v1.05135
K09375
LIM homeobox protein 6/8
v1.07988; v1.22037
K09371
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1
v1.09328 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K10394
Kinesin family member 3/17
v1.09196; v1.12479
K11525
Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein PixJ (MCP family)
v1.17028; v1.13473
K08473
Nematode chemoreceptor
v1.13159; v1.00655
K09330
Paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2
v1.15178; v1.10962; v1.16587; v1.01557
K02633
Period circadian protein
v1.23288; v1.13857
K04627
Pheromone a factor receptor
v1.22464; v1.17135
K11213
Pheromone alpha factor receptor
v1.05611 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K08502
Regulator of vacuolar morphogenesis
v1.04431
K09333
Retina and anterior neural fold homeobox-like protein
v1.17636
K09331
Short stature homeobox protein
v1.14704
K09340
T-cell leukemia homeobox protein
v1.11765
NA1
Tektin
v1.04154 K02669 Twitching motility protein PilT

1NA KEGG orthology designation not assigned.

Another protein encoded in the A. digitifera genome is a retina and anterior neural fold homeobox-like (RAX) protein that may activate the development of primitive coral photoreceptors [96,97], including a blue light-sensing, cryptochrome photoreceptor that in A. millepora is implicated in the detection of light from the lunar cycle of night time illumination to signal synchronous coral spawning [98,99]. Photosensitive behaviours and the circadian rhythms of corals are well described, and diurnal cycles of gene transcription that regulate circadian biological processes in the coral A. millepora have been reported [100]. Such traits in A. millepora appear regulated by an endogenous biological clock entrained to daily cycles of solar illumination [101]. Annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals a circadian timekeeper protein KaiC [102] that in cyanobacteria is activated during the diurnal phosphorylation rhythm [103,104]. In Synechococcus elongatus, KaiC regulates the rhythmic expression of all other proteins encoded in the genome [105], yet no homologue of any of the prokaryotic clustered circadian kiaABC genes has been identified in eukaryotes [106]. In Drosophila, KaiC together with a homologue of the eukaryotic period (Per) circadian protein drives circadian rhythms in eclosion (hatching) and locomotor activity [107]. Nevertheless, a circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) homologue (Table 4) was found in our annotation. Since CLOCK proteins serve as an essential activator of downstream elements in pathways critical to the regulation of circadian rhythms in eukaryotes [108], it would be worthy to examine how transcription of the RAX-like homeobox protein in this coral contributes to the development of circadian functions by activation of kaiC, per and Clock genes. Such a study might reveal that components of the animal circadian clock are more ancient than data previously suggested [109].

Broadcast-spawning corals, such as A. digitifera, release gametes, and the fertilised eggs develop into planula larvae within the water column until they have reached settlement competency, find a suitable hard substrate, attach and develop into the polyp on metamorphosis. Coral sperm and planula larvae achieve motility using flagella (sperm) or cilia (larvae) as their locomotor organelles. The eukaryotic axonemal proteins of cilia and flagella are composed of a dynein ATPase protein to provide mechanochemical energy transduction together with the principle structural proteins of the ciliary/flagellar microtubules [110]. The flagellar/ciliary microtubules consist of filaments composed of α- and β-tubulins, microtubule-stabilising tektins and kinesin motor proteins [111-113]. The coral genome encodes members of the dynein axonemal (flagella and cilia) proteins (Table 4) and many of the dynein cytoplasmic proteins (not tabulated), the latter being involved in intracellular organelle transport and centrosome assembly. The coral genome encodes α- and β-tubulins and members of the eukaryotic kinesin superfamily proteins (not tabulated). Amongst the many kinesin proteins encoded in the coral genome is the kinesin family member 3/17 protein, which is a direct homologue of the kinesin-II intraflagellar transport protein FLA10 essential for flagella assembly in the alga Chlamydomonas[114]. The microtubule-stabilising tektin protein, which is required for cilia and flagella assembly [113], is also encoded in the coral genome [note: there is no KEGG orthology identifier assigned to this protein]. It was a surprise, however, to find a large complement of prokaryotic flagellar proteins encoded in the coral genome consisting of archaeal flagellar (FlaC and FlaG), bacterial filament (FibB, FlliE, FliF, FliJ, FliK, FliO/FliZ, FliQ and FliT) homologue components (Table 4). Included also are the prokaryote homologues FlgN and FlbB that regulate transcriptional activation of flagellar assembly [115,116] and FlhB which controls the substrate specificity of the entire prokaryotic flagellar apparatus [117]. Encoded in the coral genome is a flagella-independent Type IV twitching mobility protein PilT that affords social gliding translocation in many prokaryotic organisms controlled by complex signal transduction systems that include two-component sensor regulators [118]. It is unlikely that these genes are derived from contamination from bacterial DNA. Such contamination would manifest itself by the random occurrence of bacterial genes from the whole genome including many housekeeping genes. In this case, the genes occur as members of groups with specialised functions, suggesting that multiple horizontal gene transfers between bacteria and the coral genome have occurred [119]. Their precise function in A. digitifera remains unknown; homologues of these prokaryotic genes have not been described previously in any other eukaryote genome.

Linked closely with flagellar/ciliary proteins are the sensory receptors that signal chemoattraction or avoidance to direct cellular motility. The coral genome reveals a variety of genes that encode chemoreceptor and chemotaxis proteins (Table 4). The chemoreceptor proteins of A. digitifera include an oxygen-sensing aerotaxis receptor that in bacteria invokes an avoidance response to anoxic micro-environments [120]. Encoded also are a nematode sensory chemoreceptor homologue [121], two homologous pheromone factor receptor proteins that in fungi activate a species-specific mating response [122], three chemotaxis protein sensor receptors belonging to the methyl-accepting chemotaxis family of proteins (MCPs) in bacteria and archaea [123], and two proteins (CheZ and CheR) and two regulators (PixG and WspE) of the two-component signal transduction (TCST) system for activation of gene expression. In bacteria and archea, as well as some plants, fungi and protozoa [124], TCST systems mediate many cellular processes that respond to a broad range of environmental stimuli via activation of a specific histidine (or serine) kinase sensor and its cognate response regulator [125]. There are 77 sequence matches to various elements of the TCST family of proteins in the A digitifera genome (data not tabulated). Included also are genes encoding members of the chemotactic cytokine (chemokine) family of sensory proteins that on secretion directs chemotaxis in nearby responsive cells by stimulating target chemokine receptors; both chemokine and chemokine receptor proteins are encoded in the coral genome. Significantly, sensory chemokines/chemokine receptors are found in all vertebrates, some viruses and some groups of bacteria, but none have been described previously for invertebrates [126].

Neural messengers, receptors and sensory proteins

Corals and other cnidarians are the earliest extant group of organisms to have a primitive nervous system network [127] thought to be evolved from a eumetazoan ancestor prior to the divergence of Cnidaria and the Bilateria [128,129]. Unlike marine sponges (Porifera) that predate synaptic innovation [130], cnidarians possess a homogenous nerve net that, although lacking any form of cephalization, accommodates fundamental neurosensory transmission across the nerve net to end in a motoneural junction to coordinate tentacle movement required for feeding and predator avoidance [131]. The nervous systems of cnidarians consist of both ectodermal sensory cells and their effector cells and endodermal multipolar ganglions capable of neurotransmission [132]. At the functional level, synaptic transmission in cnidarians relies on fast neurotransmitters (glutamate, GABA, glycine) and slow neurotransmitters (catecholamine, serotonin, neuropeptides) for sensory-signal conduction [133]. At the ultrastructural level, many cnidarian neurons have multifunctional traits of sensory, neurosecretory and stimulatory attributes [134]. Significantly, the genome of A. digitifera encodes the expression of a ciliary neurotrophic factor, which is a polypeptide hormone and nerve growth factor that promotes neurotransmitter synthesis, neurite outgrowth and regeneration [135]. Additionally, the coral genome encodes nerve growth factor and neurotrophic kinase receptors, a survival motor neuron protein, a survival neuron splicing factor, the neural outgrowth protein neurotrimin, and a neurotrophin growth factor attributed to signalling neuron survival, differentiation and growth (Table 5). Encoded for neuron regulation and development are several neuron cation-gated channels, a neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor, a neurotransmitter Na+ symporter, several neurogenic differentiation proteins, a neuronal PAS domain transcription factor for activation of neurogenesis, the axon guidance protein neurophilin-2, a neural crest protein of embryonic neural development, neural ELAV-like transcription proteins of neurogenesis, a Notch protein (79 sequence domain matches) and a neutralized protein subset of the Notch signalling pathway that promotes neuron proliferation in early neurogenic development. Structural elements of the coral nerve net include neurofilament polypeptides and neuronal adhesion proteins.

Table 5.

Neuronal and sensory proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.01918 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K01049
Acetylcholinesterase
v1.18087; v1.14516
K04136
Adrenergic receptor alpha-1B
v1.06394
K04137
Adrenergic receptor alpha-1D
v1.09628; v1.15688; v1.00966
K04140
Adrenergic receptor alpha-2C
v1.19831; v1.20450
K04142
Adrenergic receptor beta-2
v.17293
K00910
beta-Adrenergic-receptor kinase
v1.13740 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K04828
Amiloride-sensitive cation channel 1, neuronal (degenerin)
v1.23541 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K04829
Amiloride-sensitive cation channel 2, neuronal
v1.09323 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04439
beta-Arrestin
v1.07723; v1.22465
K04641
Bacteriorhodopsin
v1.08062
K05420
Ciliary neurotrophic factor
v1.03288 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K02295
Cryptochrome
v1.20011; v1.20036; v1.20084; v1.18607
K04948
Cyclic nucleotide gated channel alpha 1
v1.21470
K04951
Cyclic nucleotide gated channel alpha 4
v1.21783; v1.01466; v1.01466; v1.01466
K05326
Cyclic nucleotide gated channel, invertebrate
v1.03645
K05391
Cyclic nucleotide gated channel, other eukaryote
v1.21256
K08762
Diazepam-binding inhibitor (GABA receptor, acyl-CoA-binding protein)
v1.22156 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K00503
Dopamine beta-monooxygenase
v1.21775: v1.15989
K04148
Dopamine D1-like receptor
v1.14160; v1.01697
K04144
Dopamine receptor D1
v1.05089; v1.20018
K04145
Dopamine receptor D2
v1.14030; v1.23273
K04146
Dopamine receptor D3
v1.20536
K13088
ELAV-like protein 1
v1.18658 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K13208
ELAV-like protein 2/3/4
v1.05774 [+ 18 other sequence copies]
K04313
G protein-coupled receptor 6
v1.00572; v1.18152
K08404
G protein-coupled receptor 17
v1.23842
K04316
G protein-coupled receptor 19
v1.03948
K08411
G protein-coupled receptor 26
v1.09271
K08383
G protein-coupled receptor 34
v1.05595
K04243
G protein-coupled receptor 37 (endothelin receptor type B-like)
v1.04019
K08409
G protein-coupled receptor 45
v1.19913; v1.09821; v1.04291
K08450
G protein-coupled receptor 56
v1.05404
K04321
G protein-coupled receptor 63
v1.02179; v1.10397
K08451
G protein-coupled receptor 64
v1.23269 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K08408
G protein-coupled receptor 68
v1.21091
K08421
G protein-coupled receptor 84
v1.11008
K04302
G protein-coupled receptor 85
v1.21884; v1.01951
K08452
G protein-coupled receptor 97
v1.03243 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K08378
G protein-coupled receptor 103
v1.13790; v1.18939
K08453
G protein-coupled receptor 110
v1.09442; v1.14019
K08455
G protein-coupled receptor 112
v1.24009
K08456
G protein-coupled receptor 113
v1.04290
K08459
G protein-coupled receptor 114
v1.06608; v1.24223
K08457
G protein-coupled receptor 115
v1.10800 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K08458
G protein-coupled receptor 116
v1.07662 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K08462
G protein-coupled receptor 125
v1.09663; v1.08981
K08463
G protein-coupled receptor 126
v1.24252
K08464
G protein-coupled receptor 128
v1.02750 [+ 26 other sequence copies]
K08465
G protein-coupled receptor 133
v1.05774 [+ 11 other sequence copies]
K08466
G protein-coupled receptor 144
v1.05497; v1.13272; v1.01323
K08436
G protein-coupled receptor 152
v1.08653 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K08467
G protein-coupled receptor 157
v1.11807; v1.10392; v1.10394
K08469
G protein-coupled receptor 158
v1.07294; v1.00247
K08439
G protein-coupled receptor 161
v1.05167
K08442
G protein-coupled receptor 176
v1.08677; v1.23465; v1.19865; v1.06986
K12762
G protein-coupled receptor GPR1
v1.13395
K08291
G protein-coupled receptor kinase
v1.18529; v1.07599; v1.05558
K12487
G protein-coupled receptor kinase interactor 2
v1.02481
K04619
G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member B
v1.22242
K04622
G protein-coupled receptor family C group 6 member A
v1.08625; v1.13650; v1.13048; v1.18694
K04599
G protein-coupled receptor Mth (Methuselah protein)
v1.07465; v1.10540
K08341
GABA(A) receptor-associated protein (autophagy-related protein 8)
v1.09831 [+ 30 other sequence copies]
K05270
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor, invertebrate
v1.18702; v1.11701
K05183
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor beta-3
v1.04252 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K05185
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor epsilon
v1.06325
K05186
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor gamma-1
v1.00048
K05188
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor gamma-3
v1.07506 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K04615
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor 1
v1.07506 [+ 24 other sequence copies]
K04616
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor 2
v1.06426; v1.10563; v1.01138
K05192
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor theta
v1.15485
K05198
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 2
v1.09807
K05200
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 4
v1.04764
K05207
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, delta 2
v1.15247 [+ 12 other sequence copies]
K05313
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, invertebrate
v1.15247 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K05202
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 2
v1.00617
K05203
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 3
v1.09688 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K05208
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 1
v1.21204 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K05212
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl-D-aspartate 2D
v1.01622
K05214
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl-D-aspartate 3B
v1.01418 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K05387
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, other eukaryote
v1.04275
K05194
Glycine receptor alpha-2
v1.10737; v1.06885
K05195
Glycine receptor alpha-3
v1.05488
K05271
Glycine receptor alpha-4
v1.08900; v1.06885
K05196
Glycine receptor beta
v1.18634
K05397
Glycine receptor, invertebrate
v1.14569; v1.14570
K09071
Heart-and neural crest derivatives-expressed protein
v1.16783 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K02168
High-affinity choline transport protein
v1.13837
K07608
Internexin neuronal intermediate filament protein, alpha
v1.01671
K04309
Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 4
v1.09480; v1.05605
K04308
Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5
v1.15300 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K08399
Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 6
v1.17524 [+ 14 other sequence copies]
K04306
Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 7
v1.21700; v1.03578; v1.17196
K04307
Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 8
v1.16104
K08396
Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member X
v1.08718; v1.02042; v1.02042
K04604
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1/5
v1.22794 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K04605
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3
v1.15331
K04607
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 4
v1.01418
K04608
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 6/7/8
v1.21698; v1.04544; v1.21739
K14636
MFS transporter, solute carrier family 18 (acetylcholine transporter) 3
v1.05751; v1.19720; v1.22165; v1.02336
K04134
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor
v1.11550
K04129
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1
v1.01913 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04131
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3
v1.18723
K04132
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4
v1.08171
K04133
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5
v1.07408 [+ 34 other sequence copies]
K02583
Nerve growth factor receptor (TNFR superfamily member 16)
v1.15265 [+ 91 other sequence copies]
K06491
Neural cell adhesion molecule
v1.13789; v1.24010; v1.03980
K09038
Neural retina-specific leucine zipper protein
v1.24586; v1.16386; v1.16387
K08052
Neurofibromin 1
v1.05520; v1.15407; v1.07950
K04572
Neurofilament light polypeptide
v1.19724
K04573
Neurofilament medium polypeptide (neurofilament 3)
v1.15787 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K09081
Neurogenin 1 (neurogenic differentiation protein)
v1.00345; v1.05338; v1.10997
K08033
Neurogenic differentiation factor 1
v1.07355; v1.14517
K09078
Neurogenic differentiation factor 2
v1.08832
K09079
Neurogenic differentiation factor 4
v1.06678; v1.06677
K01393
Neurolysin
v1.16238 [+ 19 other sequence copies]
K06756
Neuronal cell adhesion molecule
v1.20460; v1.16967
K06757
Neurofascin NFASC (cell adhesion molecule CAMs)
v1.22060; v1.03561
K07525
Neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor
v1.03908
K09098
Neuronal PAS domain-containing protein 1/3
v1.00089
K05247
Neuropeptide FF-amide peptide
v1.21565
K08375
Neuropeptide FF receptor 2
v1.06392 [+ 11 other sequence copies]
K04209
Neuropeptide Y receptor, invertebrate
v1.08609 [+ 31 other sequence copies]
K06819
Neuropilin 2
v1.11492 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K03308
Neurotransmitter:Na+ symporter, NSS family
v1.16744 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K06774
Neurotrimin
v1.05353
K03176
Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1
v1.20055
K04360
Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 2
v1.03803
K04356
Neurotrophin 3
v1.09523
K04803
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-1 (muscle)
v1.11940
K04806
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-4
v1.01548
K04808
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-6
v1.05056; v1.12097
K04809
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-7
v1.07222; v1.11069
K04810
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-9
v1.18231 [+ 32 other sequence copies]
K05312
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, invertebrate
v1.24404
K04813
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta-2 (neuronal)
v1.06514; v1.23640
K04815
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta-4
v1.18634
K04816
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor delta
v1.18231 [+ 32 other sequence copies]
K05312
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, invertebrate
v1.05293 [+ 78 other sequence copies]
K02599
Notch protein
v1.15348 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04256
c-Opsin protein
v1.01972
K08385
G0-Opsin protein
v1.13345 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K04255
r-Opsin protein
v1.00749; v1.03435
K00504
Peptidylglycine monooxygenase
v1.12323 [+ 11 other sequence copies]
K00678
Phosphatidylcholine-retinol O-acyltransferase
v1.18340 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K09624
Protease, serine, 12 (neurotrypsin, motopsin)
v1.08030 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K01931
Protein neuralized
v1.04431
K09333
Retina and anterior neural fold homeobox-like protein
v1.01789; v1.06542
K00061
Retinol dehydrogenase
v1.05804 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K11150
Retinol dehydrogenase 8
v1.22340; v1.14029
K11151
Retinol dehydrogenase 10
v1.24399; v1.07017
K11154
Retinol dehydrogenase 16
v1.19667; v1.16885; v1.24371
K00909
Rhodopsin kinase
v1.12432; v1.15302; v1.07505
K09516
all-trans-Retinol 13,14-reductase
v1.09104 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K05613
Solute carrier family 1 (glial high affinity glutamate transporter), member 2
v1.19779; v1.08769; v1.22032
K05617
Solute carrier family 1 (high affinity Asp/glutamate transporter), member 6
v1.19293; v1.19292
K14387
Solute carrier family 5 (high affinity choline transporter), member 7
v1.10901; v1.19493
K05336
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), invertebrate
v1.24615 [+ 10 other sequence copies]
K05034
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, GABA) member 1
v1.07932
K05046
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, GABA) member 13
v1.01817
K05036
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, dopamine) member 3
v1.20691; v1.16333; v1.15484; v1.02123
K05038
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, glycine) member 5
v1.15484; v1.15484
K05042
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, glycine) member 9
v1.18461; v1.09068; v1.02237; v1.20880
K05333
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter) member 18
v1.02239; v1.13836; v1.09067
K05334
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter) member19
v1.21997 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K12839
Survival of motor neuron-related-splicing factor member 30
v1.21997 [+ 6 other sequence copies] K13129 Survival motor neuron protein

Cnidarians differentiate highly specialised sensory and mechanoreceptor cells involved in the capture of prey and for defence against predators. Their stinging cells, termed nematocysts or cnidocytes, are stimulated by adjacent chemosensory cells. Nematocysts trigger the release of a stinging barb (cnidae tubule) via ultra-fast exocytosis on physical contact with ciliary mechanoreceptors of the cnidocyte to deliver the discharge of its venom [136]. Despite considerable advances in the sensory biology of cnidarians, knowledge of the specific receptor genes that regulate cnidocyte function remains incomplete. In Hydra, and perhaps other cnidarians, cnidocyte discharge is controlled by an ancient light-activated, opsin-mediated phototransduction pathway [137] that precedes the evolution of cubozoan (box jellyfish) eyes [138]; cubozoans are the most basal of animals to have eyes containing a lens and ciliary-type visual cells similar to that of vertebrate eyes [139]. These G-coupled opsin photoreceptors of the retinylidene-forming protein family encoded in the genome of A. digitifera include rhodopsin, bacteriorhodopsin, c-opsin, r-opsin and G0-opsin (Table 5), but not the Gs-subfamily of opsin receptors reported to be present in sea anemones, hydra and jellyfish [140], that together with cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channel proteins, arrestin (β-adrenergic receptor inhibitor) and other retino-protein receptors, are usual components of the bilaterian phototransduction cascade. Present also are genes to express rhodopsin kinase and β-adrenergic receptor kinase which are related members of the serine/threonine kinase family of proteins that specifically initiate deactivation of G-protein coupled receptors. Additional proteins of retinol metabolism of the phototransduction pathway encoded in the A. digitifera genome are retinol dehydrogenase, all-trans-retinol 13,14 reductase and phosphatidylcholine (lichthin)-retinol O-acyltransferase, a neural retina-specific leucine zipper protein that is an intrinsic regulator of photoreceptor development and function, and a retina and anterior neural fold homeobox-like protein that modulates the expression of photoreceptor genes within the rhodopsin promoter. The genome of A. digitifera encodes also a blue light-sensing, cryptochrome photoreceptor thought to signal synchronous coral spawning by detecting illumination from the lunar cycle [98,99].

The A. digitifera genome reveals genes to express a broad array of neurotransmitter receptor proteins (Table 5), including glycine and glutamate neuroreceptors, adrenergic receptors that target non-dopamine catecholamines (i.e., epinephrine and norepinephrine), dopamine, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, sensory G protein-coupled receptors and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ligand-gated ion channel and G protein-coupled receptors (and inhibitors), several of which are encoded in high copy numbers. Cellular trafficking of neurotransmitters to presynaptic terminals is essential for neurotransmission, and significantly the genome of A. digitifera encodes a wide range of solute carrier neurotransmitter transporters, including a high affinity choline transporter and an acetylcholine-specific protein belonging to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of secondary transporters. Encoded also is dopamine β-monooxygenase that catalyses the conversion of dopamine to norepinephrine in the catecholamine biosynthetic pathway, which is necessary for cross-activation of adrenergic neuroreceptors [141]. Notably, the A. digitifera genome encodes acetylcholinesterase that is expressed at neuromuscular junctions and cholinergic synapses where its protease activity serves to terminate synaptic transmission.

The primitive nervous networks of cnidarians are strongly peptidergic with at least 35 neuropeptides identified from different cnidarian classes [142]. Our annotation of the sequenced A. digitifera genome, however, revealed only the neuropeptide FF-amide neurotransmitter, a RF amide related peptide, and its neuropeptide FF and Y receptors (Table 5). Neuropeptides are usually expressed as large precursor proteins which comprise multiple copies of “immature” neuropeptides. Our annotation did not readily reveal these precursor neuropeptide proteins, but we did find enzymes required for their processing, for example, a variety of carboxypeptidase enzymes (not tabulated) that remove propeptide carboxyl residues at basic peptidase sites, and the mature peptide neurotransmitters that are finished by consecutive modification by peptidylglycine (α-hydroxylating) monooxidase (PHM) and peptidyl α-hydroxyglycine α-amidating lyase (PAL) enzymes, both of which are commonly expressed in mammals as a single bifunctional peptidylglycine monooxygenase (K00504/EC 1.14.17.3) [143]. Our extensive catalogue of animal-like neural and sensory proteins revealed by genome annotation is testament that essential neurobiological features were developed in the primitive neural networks of early eumetazoan evolution.

Calcification and Ca2+-signalling proteins

The massive structures of coral reefs evident today are a construction of aggregated calcium carbonate deposited over long geological time by scleractinian corals and other calcifying organisms, yet our understanding of the molecular processes that regulate the biological processes of coral calcification is limited [144]. Ca2+ transfer from seawater to the calicoblastic site of coral calcification occurs by passive diffusion through the gastrovascular cavity [145] and by active calcium transport [146]. Active entry of Ca2+ through the oral epithelial layer is regulated by voltage-dependent calcium channels, such as demonstrated by the L-type alpha protein cloned from the reef-building coral Stylophora pistillata[147]. Ca2+ transport across the calioblastic ectoderm to the extracellular calcifying site is facilitated by the plasma-membrane ATP-dependent calcium pump that in S. pistillata resemble the Ca2+-ATPase family of mammalian proteins [148]. By 2H+/Ca2+-exchange at the calioblastic membrane, Ca2+-ATPase removes H+ (from the net reaction Ca2+ + CO2 + H2O ⇒ CaCO3 + 2H+) thereby increasing the saturation state of CaCO3 to sustain calcium precipitation [146]. Importantly, located also at the calicoblastic membrane is carbonic anhydrase [149] which is required to catalyse the intermediate step of calcification by the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide (CO2 + H2O ⇒ HCO3- + H+). In coral phototrophic symbiosis, despite numerous studies describing the well-known phenomenon of light-enhanced calcification, the relationship linking symbiont photosynthesis to coral calcification has been elusive [150,151]. Nonetheless, efforts to better understand the calcifying response of scleractinian corals to environmental change and ocean acidification are gaining traction [149,152,153].

Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) have been examined extensively in mammalian physiology for converting membrane potential into intracellular Ca2+ transients for signalling transduction pathways (reviewed in [154]). VGCC signalling affects cellular processes to include muscle contraction, neuronal excitation, gene transcription, fertilisation, cell differentiation and development, proliferation, hormone release, activation of calcium-dependent protein kinases, cell death via necrosis and apoptosis pathways, phagocytosis and endo/exocytosis. Remarkably, annotation of the genome of A. digitifera reveals sequences encoding homologues of all the VGCC (α, αδ, β, and γ) subunits of the molecular (L, N, P/Q and R) phenotypes expressed in mammalian physiology (Table 6). There are multiple sequences encoding three variants of Ca2+-transporting ATPase, of which at least one is necessary for coral calcification. There is only one sequence match for expressing carbonic anhydrase in the genome of A. digitifera, which may reflect the high catalytic efficiency of this calcifying enzyme [155], although a BLAST search of ZoophyteBase does reveal scaffolds with low e-values which on future experimental inspection might uncover multiple copies of this enzyme essential for calcification. There are multiple sequences that express solute carrier Na+/Ca2+- and Na+/K+/Ca2+-exchange families of transport proteins that with expression of the coral Ca2+/H+-antiporter may regulate cellular pH and Ca2+ homeostasis.

Table 6.

Calcification and Ca2+-signalling proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.06452; v1.06451; v1.24424; v1.16923
K07300
Ca2+:H+ antiporter
v1.01669 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K01537
Ca2+−transporting ATPase
v1.22367; v1.22366; v1.22365
K05850
Ca2+ transporting ATPase, plasma membrane
v1.19074
K05853
Ca2+ transporting ATPase, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum
v1.22416; v1.22417; v1.15682; v1.00750
K14757
Calbindin D28
v1.24568 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K01672
Carbonic anhydrase
v1.09241
K08272
Calcium binding protein 39
v1.02323 [+ 39 other sequence copies]
K13448
Calcium-binding protein CML
v1.05162 [+ 21 other sequence copies]
K13412
Calcium-dependent protein kinase
v1.09352
K07359
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase
v1.06475; v1.07555;v1.00945; v1.00159; v1.21122
K08794
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I
v1.06475; v1.01061; v1.21150; v1.22443
K04515
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
v1.00159
K05869
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV
v1.21927; v1.01218; v1.22226; v1.06623; v1.13703
K06103
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase
v1.13460
K08284
Calcium channel MID1
v1.20738; v1.01401
K12841
Calcium homeostasis endoplasmic reticulum protein
v1.22794 [+ 11 other sequence copies]
K04612
Calcium-sensing receptor
v1.10079 [+ 17 other sequence copies]
K02183
Calmodulin
v1.10994
K14734
S100 calcium binding protein G
v1.02488 [+ 14 other sequence copies]
K05849
Solute carrier family 8 (sodium/calcium exchanger)
v1.23153 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K13749
Solute carrier family 24 (sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger)
v1.14863
K12304
Soluble calcium-activated nucleotidase 1
v1.18656 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K04858
Voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha-2/delta-1
v1.13222
K04860
Voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha-2/delta-3
v1.08078 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K05315
Voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha 1, invertebrate
v1.03896 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K05316
Voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha-2/delta, invertebrate
v1.04798
K05317
Voltage-dependent calcium channel beta, invertebrate
v1.22788
K04863
Voltage-dependent calcium channel beta-2
v1.09999
K04872
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-7
v1.02505
K04873
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-8
v1.03648[+ 6 other sequence copies]
K04850
Voltage-dependent calcium channel L type alpha-1C
v1.03648; v1.17267
K04851
Voltage-dependent calcium channel L type alpha-1D
v1.03648; v1.13219; v1.21895
K04857
Voltage-dependent calcium channel L type alpha-1S
v1.06313; v1.01656; v1.23096
K04344
Voltage-dependent calcium channel P/Q type alpha-1A
v1.08078 [+ 10 other sequence copies]
K04849
Voltage-dependent calcium channel N type alpha-1B
v1.07968
K04852
Voltage-dependent calcium channel R type alpha-1E
v1.01364; v1.13467; v1.08705
K04854
Voltage-dependent calcium channel T type alpha-1G
v1.15414; v1.14241; v1.09595 K04855 Voltage-dependent calcium channel T type alpha-1H

Implicit to coral calcification is Ca2+ regulation that affects signalling of other vital cellular functions. Cellular Ca2+ is mediated by the calcium-sensing receptor calmodulin (18 sequence matches) and other messenger calcium-binding effectors (Table 6), including the calcium-binding protein CML (40 protein domain sequence matches). Calcium/calmodulin-protein kinase proteins are arguably key to Ca2+-signalling in coral symbiosis but, with the exception of activation of sperm flagellar motility [156], their precise role has not been elaborated.

Plant-derived proteins

Endosymbiosis has contributed greatly to eukaryotic evolution, most notably to the genesis of plastids and mitochondria derived from prokaryotic antecedents. Genetic integration by endosymbiont-to-host transfer (EGT) or replacement (EGR) has been a significant force in early metazoan innovation, whereby nuclear transferred genes may even adopt novel functions in the host cell or replace existing versions of the protein that they encode [157]. Prokaryote-to-eukaryotic gene transfer has been widespread in evolution, but examples of genetic exchange between unrelated eukaryotes, such as between algal symbionts and their multicellular eukaryote host, are considered rare (reviewed by [158,159]). One such example is aroB (3-dehydroquinate synthase) transferred to the genome of the sea anemone N. vectensis, which sequence best fits that of the dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina[119]. Close inspection of the amino acid sequence of the aroB gene product, as reported by Shinzato et al. [45], clearly shows this protein to be 2-epi-5-epi-valiolone synthase (EVS), a sugar phosphate cyclase orthologue that catalyses the conversion of sedoheptulose 7-phosphate to 2-epi-5-epi-valiolone found to be a precursor of the mycosporine-like amino acid (MAA) sunscreen shinorine in the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis[160]. Additionally, the EVS gene of N. vectensis has a distinctive O-methytransferase fusion that is identical in O. marina[161]. The shikimate pathway is essential to apicomplexan parasites of the genera Plasmodium, Toxoplasma and Cryptosporidium and of Tetrahymena ciliates to express a pentafunctional aroM gene similar to that of Ascomycetes, which is thought to have been conveyed by fungal gene transfer to a common ancestral progenitor [162]. In a separate example, H. viridis expresses a plant-like ascorbate peroxidase gene (HvAPX1) during oogenesis in both symbiotic and aposymbiotic individuals [163], whereby peroxidase activity is coincident with oogenesis and embryogenesis that in Hydra acts as a ROS scavenger to protect the oocyte from apoptotic degradation [164]. The sacoglossan (sea slug) molluscs Elysia chlorotica and E. viridis (Plakobranchidae) acquire plastids on ingestion of the siphonaceous alga Voucherea litorea (termed “kleptoplasty”) and, by maintaining sequestered plastids in an active photosynthetic state, has emerged as a model organism for the transfer of nuclear-encoded plant genes from algal symbiont to its animal host [165]. In this symbiosis, the family of light-harvesting genes psbO, prk (phosphoribokinase) and chlorophyll synthase (chlG) are entrained in the genome of Elysia chlorotica (reviewed in [166,167]), although there is debate whether these genes are transcriptionally expressed (compare [168] and [169]). Also, phylogenomic analysis of the predicted proteins of the aposymbiotic unicellular choano-flagellate Monosiga brevicollis, considered to be a stem progenitor of the animal kingdom [170,171], reveals 103 genes having strong algal affiliations arising from multiple phototrophic donors [172]. Such notable examples illustrate the transfer of algal genes to animal recipients.

KEGG orthology-based annotation of the predicted proteome of A. digitifera reveals a plethora of sequences presumed to be of algal origin (Table 7). Like E. chlorotica, the coral genome has encoded the photosystem II (PSII) protein PsbO of the oxygen-evolving complex of photosynthesis, as well as the PSII light-harvesting complex protein PsbL that is important in protecting PSII from photo-inactivation [173]. Encoded also are the photosystem I subunit proteins PsaI and PsaO. Additionally encoded are the photosystem P840 reaction center cytochrome c551 (PscC) protein and the photosynthetic reaction center M subunit protein, the light-harvesting proteins complex 1 alpha (PufA), the complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 6 (LHCB6), the cyanobacterial phycobilisome proteins AcpF and AcpG, the phycocyanin-associated antenna protein CpcD, the phycocyanobilin lyase protein CpcF and the phycoerythrin-associated linker protein CpeS. Like E. chlorotica, the coral genome encodes chlorophyll synthase (ChlG), a chlorophyll transporter protein PucC, a light-independent nitrogenase-like protochlorophyllide reductase enzyme that is sensitive to oxygen [174] and a red chlorophyll reductase essential to the detoxification of photodynamic chlorophyll catabolites arising from plant/algal senescence [175]. Three chlorosome proteins of the photosynthetic antenna complex of green sulphur bacteria, a bacteriochlorophyll methyltransferase involved in BChl c biosynthesis [176] and the retinylidene bacteriorhodopsin of phototrophic Archaea are also encoded in the coral genome. Present are genes encoding subunit 6 of the cytochrome B6f complex that links PSII and PSI via the plastoquinone pool, together with chloroplast ferredoxin-like NapH and NapG proteins and their 2Fe-2S cluster protein. The coral genome, however, encodes sequences for NAD+-ferredoxin reductase (HcaD; not tablulated), rather than the required NADP+-ferredoxin reductase of photosynthesis. Annotation of the A. digitifera genome revealed genes unexpectedly encoding ferredoxin hydrogenase [EC:1.12.7.2] and that of its small subunit protein (Table 7) involved in light-dependent production of molecular hydrogen having its [Fe-Fe]-cluster coupled to the photosynthetic transport chain via a charge-transfer complex with ferredoxin (see [177]).

Table 7.

Plant-derived proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.14452
K09843
(+)-Abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase
v1.18868
K14496
Abscisic acid receptor PYR/PYL family (PYL)
v1.21983; v1.05890
K03342
p-Aminobenzoate synthetase / 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase (PabBC)
v1.15436
K02822
Ascorbate-specific IIB component, PTS system (PTS-Ula-EiiB)
v1.11187; v1.13966
K00423
L-Ascorbate oxidase
v1.20081; v1.22465
K13604
Bacteriochlorophyll C20 methyltransferase (BchU)
v1.07723
K04641
Bacteriorhodopsin (BoP)
v1.21858
K04040
Chlorophyll synthase (ChlG)
v1.01742
K08945
Chlorosome envelope protein A (CsmA)
v1.04797; v1.14208
K08946
Chlorosome envelope protein B (CsmB)
v1.18698
K08948
Chlorosome envelope protein D (CamD)
v1.18637
K02642
Cytochrome b6f complex subunit 6 (PetL)
v1.21101; v1.14192; v1.14548
K01735
3-Dehydroquinate synthase (AroB)
v1.05796
K10210
4,4′-Diaponeurosporene oxidase (carotenoid biosynthesis; CrtP)
v1.11730
K04755
Ferredoxin, 2Fe-2S (FdX)
v1.19154; v1.00014
K00532
Ferredoxin hydrogenase
v1.00014
K00534
Ferredoxin hydrogenase small subunit
v1.17698; v1.06031; v1.16647
K02574
Ferredoxin-type protein (NapH)
v1.23058
K02573
Ferredoxin-type protein (NapG)
v1.08414
K08926
Light-harvesting complex 1 alpha chain (PufA)
v1.21458
K08917
Light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 6 (LHCB6)
v1.03743
K08226
MFS transporter, BCD family, chlorophyll transporter (PucC)
v1.13030; v1.08678
K13413
Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4/5, plant ((MKK4_5P)
v1.02429; v1.10744; v1.03340
K08929
Photosynthetic reaction center M subunit (PufM)
v1.03631
K02696
Photosystem I subunit VIII (PsaI)
v1.11432
K14332
Photosystem I subunit (PsaO)
v1.17422
K02713
Photosystem II protein (PsbL)
v1.18303
K02716
Photosystem II oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 1 (PsbO)
v1.12300; v1.21136
K08942
Photosystem P840 reaction center cytochrome c551 ((PscC)
v1.00280
K02097
Phycobilisome core component 9 (AcpF)
v1.10967
K02290
Phycobilisome rod-core linker protein (AcpG)
v1.02166
K02287
Phycocyanin-associated, rod protein (CpcD)
v1.19642; v1.07305; v1.19572; v1.01248
K02289
Phycocyanobilin lyase beta subunit (CpcF)
v1.10441
K05382
Phycoerythrin-associated linker protein (CpeS)
v1.13406
K10027
Phytoene dehydrogenase (desaturase; CrtI)
v1.18809; v1.06199
K02291
Phytoene synthase (CrtB)
v1.20411; v1.02037; v1.14064; v1.21095
K09060
Plant G-box-binding factor (GBF)
v1.10035
K00218
Protochlorophyllide reductase [NifEN-like; Por]
v1.21846
K05358
Quinate dehydrogenase (QuiA)
v1.03127
K13545
Red chlorophyll catabolite reductase (ACD2)
v1.05899
K00891
Shikimate kinase (AroK, AroL)
v1.21101; v1.14192; v1.05899
K13829
Shikimate kinase / 3-dehydroquinate synthase (AroKB)
v1.12938
K08500
Syntaxin of plants (SYP6)
v1.06575
K08506
Syntaxin of plants (SYP7)
v1.04929
K09834
Tocopherol cyclase (VTE1, SXD1)
v1.01022
K05928
Tocopherol O-methyltransferase
v1.05457 K09838 Zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP, ABA1)

Like N. vectensis and the dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina, the genome of A. digitifera encodes an O-methyltransferase which is immediately downstream of EVS, but the two genes are not fused. Using a ZoophyteBase BlastP search, the O-methyltransferase showed little sequence homology with the corresponding protein of A. variabilis (e-value of 6.972E-2 and Bit score of 34.27), whereas the EVS protein shared 87% absolute sequence identity to the A. variabilis EVS protein. What role, if any, these two genes play in mycosporine-like amino acid (MAA) biosynthesis in A. digitifera has yet to be determined, although it has been suggested from the transcriptome of Acropora microphthalma that MAA biosynthesis proceeds from a branch point at 3-dehydroquinate of the shikimic acid pathway as a shared metabolic adaptation between the coral host and its symbiotic zooxanthellae [40]. The 3-dehydroquinate synthase enzyme of the shikimic acid pathway, thought to be a key intermediate in an alternative MAA biosynthetic pathway in A. variabilis[178], is instead encoded by the fused aroKB gene of A. digitifera (Table 7). Additional shikimate proteins of the predicted proteome, although not limited to phototrophs, are shikimate kinase (AroK), quinate dehydrogenase (QuiA) and the conjoined p-aminobenzoate synthase and 4-amino-4-deoxychlorismate lysate (PabBC) enzyme necessary for folate biosynthesis [179]. Other plant-related gene homologues include the phytohormone abscisic acid receptor protein (PabBC) and its cytochrome P450 monooxygenase abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase, L-ascorbate oxidase and PTS system degrading enzymes, the unique SYP6 and SYP7 syntaxins of plant vesicular transport, tocopherol cyclase and a tocopherol O-methyltransferase enzyme that converts γ-tocopherol to α-tocopherol. Essential for carotene biosynthesis are phytoene synthase (CrtB) and phytoene dehydrogenase (CrtI) enzymes. Significantly, encoded within the coral genome is zeaxanthin epoxidase that is essential for abscisic acid biosynthesis and is a key enzyme in the xanthophyll cycle of plants and algae to impart oxidative stress tolerance.

Given that viruses often mediate gene transfer processes, it is intriguing that certain bacteriophages of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus cyanobacteria are reported to carry genes encoding the photosynthesis D1 (psbA), and D2 (psbD) proteins, a high-light inducible protein (HLIP) [180,181] and the photosynthetic electron transport plastocyanin (petE) and ferredoxin (petF) proteins thought to enhance the photosynthetic fitness of their host [182-184]. Accordingly, it has been suggested that the transfer of psbA by viruses associated with Symbiodinium could lessen the severity of thermal impairment to PSII and the response of corals to thermal bleaching [185]. It is yet unknown if phages or dinoflagellate-infecting viruses [186], particularly those of Symbiodinium[187], may affect gene transfer leading to complementary (or “shared”) metabolic adaptations of symbiosis [119,188].

Proteins of nitrogen metabolism

It is well accepted that intracellular Symbiodinium spp. provide reduced carbon for coral heterotrophic metabolism by photosynthetic carbon fixation. Because of this metabolic relationship, light is a critical feature in the bioenergetics of coral symbiosis [189]. The algal photosynthate translocated to corals, however, is deficient in nitrogen at levels necessary to sustain autotrophic growth. While corals can assimilate fixed nitrogen from surrounding seawater [190], “recycled” nitrogen within the symbiosis may account for as much as 90% of the photosynthetic nitrogen demand [191]. It would not be surprising then that light would have a strong influence on the uptake and retention of ammonium by symbiotic corals. Consequently, corals excrete excess ammonium in darkness [192], and in light excretion is induced by treatment with the photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3-(3,4-diclorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) [193]. Since ammonia is the product of nitrogen fixation, these observations suggest that the coral holobiont may fix nitrogen in the dark, or when photosynthesis is repressed, during which coral tissues are hypoxic [194], and nitrogenase activity is not inactivated by molecular oxygen [195].

Tropical coral reefs are typically surrounded by low-nutrient oceanic waters of low productivity but, paradoxically, the waters of coral reefs often have elevated levels of inorganic nitrogen [196,197] attributed to high rates of nitrogen fixation. While nitrogen fixation from diazotrophic epiphytes of the coral reef substrata and sediments [197,198] and diazotrophic bacterioplankton of the coral reef lagoon [199] provide substantial quantities of fixed nitrogen for assimilation by the coral reef, mass-balance estimates show this input to be less than the community’s annual nitrogen demand [200]. Endolithic nitrogen-fixingbacteria are abundant in the skeleton of living corals where they benefit from organic carbon excreted by overlaying coral tissues to provide a ready source of energy for dinitrogen reduction [201]. Additionally, intracellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are reported to coexist with dinoflagellate symbionts in the tissues of Monastraea cavernosa and to functionally express nitrogenase activity [202]. Corals also harbour a diverse assemblage of heterotrophic microorganisms in their skele-ton, tissues and lipid-rich mucus (reviewed in [203]), and these communities include large populations of diazo-trophic bacteria [204,205], and archaea [206]. Apart from nitrogen fixation, the coral microbiota contributes to other nitrogen-cycling processes, such as nitrification, ammonification and denitrification [207,208]. We were surprised to find several nitrogen fixation and cycling proteins encoded in the genome of A. digitifera (Table 8), notably a nitrogen fixation NifU-like protein, the Nif-specific regulatory protein (NifA), the regulatory NAD(+)-dinitrogen-reductase ADP-D-ribosylastransferase protein, a nitrifying ammonia monooxy-genase enzyme and nitrate reductase, which are usually expressed only by prokaryotic microorganisms.

Table 8.

Proteins of nitrogen metabolism in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.23444; v1.09133; v1.23443
K05521
ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase (DraG)
v1.09202
K10944
Ammonia monooxygenase subunit A
v1.03645 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K03320
Ammonium transporter, Amt family
v1.12268; v1.12269
K06580
Ammonium transporter Rh
v1.02406
K01954
Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (CPS)
v1.01524; v1.18283; v1.18284
K01948
Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (CPS, ammonia)
v1.01615
K04016
Formate-dependent nitrite reductase (NrfA)
v1.16277; v1.23483; v1.13667; v1.22675
K00261
Glutamate dehydrogenase (NAD(P)+)
v1.17166; v1.11089
K01745
Histidine ammonia-lyase
v1.22825; v1.08034;v1.o8520
K05123
Integration host cell factor (INF) subunit beta
v1.11343
K05951
NAD+−dinitrogen-reductase ADP-D-ribosyltransferase (DraT)
v1.00547
K02584
Nif-specific regulatory protein (NifA)
v1.18869
K00371
Nitrate reductase 1, beta subunit
v1.06763
K08346
Nitrate reductase 2, beta subunit
v1.14858; v1.00685; v1.23148
K05916
Nitric oxide dioxygenase
v1.16954 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K02448
Nitric oxide reductase NorD protein
v1.06115
K02164
Nitric oxide reductase NorE protein
v1.17629 [+ 12 other sequence copies]
K04748
Nitric oxide reductase NorQ protein
v1.24077 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K13125
Nitric oxide synthase-interacting protein
v1.21801; v1.05719; v1.23577; v1.19464
K13253
Nitric-oxide synthase, invertebrate
v1.05980
K00363
Nitrite reductase (NAD(P)H) small subunit
v1.00101
K02598
Nitrite transporter NirC
v1.02355; v1.18772
K04488
Nitrogen fixation protein NifU
v1.17812
K02589
Nitrogen regulatory protein PII 1
v1.09150
K02570
Periplasmic nitrate reductase NapD
v1.01560
K02571
Periplasmic nitrate reductase NapE
v1.10035
K00218
Protochlorophyllide reductase [NifEN-like]
v1.08939
K03737
Pyruvate-flavodoxin reductase (NifJ)
v1.17373
K00365
Urate oxidase
v1.13217
K01427
Urease
v1.16409 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K03187
Urease accessory protein
v1.13217
K01429
Urease subunit beta
v1.13217
K14048
Urease subunit gamma/beta
v1.12211 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K00106
Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase
v1.12212 K13481 Xanthine dehydrogenase small subunit

(Excluding amino acid and pyrimidine/purine nucleotide synthesis or metabolism).

The presence of genes encoding proteins involved in nitrogen fixation raises speculation that corals may contribute directly to, or perhaps co-regulate, certain processes that catalyse the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH3) by the enzyme nitrogenase reductase (NifH). The functional NifH enzyme is a binary protein composed of a molybdenum-iron (MoFe) protein (NifB/NifDK), or its NifEN homologue, fused with a FeMo-cofactor (FeMoco) protein [209]. While genes encoding NifB, NifDK (or NifEN) and their FeMo-cofactor do not appear in the genome of A. digitifera, a gene encoding the NifEN-like protein protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) is present (Table 8). POR has all three subunits with high similarity to the assembled MoFe nitrogenase [210], but this homologue is unlikely to be effective in nitrogen reduction [211,212] since its activity is light dependent [213] when tissues are highly oxic [193]. The NifU protein encoded in the coral genome preassembles the metallocatalytic Fe-S clusters for maturation of nitrogenase [214], but its assemblage without NifS, a cysteine desulfurase needed for [Fe-S] cluster assembly [215], would be incomplete, and its pre-nitrogenase receptor is also missing. Yet, the coral does have the nifJ gene that encodes pyruvate:flavodoxin oxidoreductase required for electron transport in nitrogenase reduction [216]. The regulatory NifA protein encoded in the coral genome might activate, on stimulation by the integration host factor (INF), transcription of nitrogen fixation (nif) operons of RNA polymerase [217], and both of these proteins are encoded in the coral genome. Additional to this transcriptional control, post-translational nitrogenase activity is controlled by reversible ADP-ribosylation of a specific arginine residue in the nitrogenase complex [218]. NAD(+)-dinitrogen-reductase ADP-D-ribosyltransferase (DraT) inactivates the nitrogenase complex while ADP-ribosylgly-cohydrolase (DraG) removes the ADP-ribose moiety to restore nitrogenase activity, and both of these enzymes are encoded in the coral genome. Given that genes encoding essential constituent proteins of nitrogenase assembly appear incomplete, corals are unlikely to fix nitrogen per se, but co-opted elements of the coral genome to regulate processes of nitrogen fixation by its diazotrophic consortia is a prospect worthy of exploration [219].

Nitrofying/nitrifying bacteria and archaea express the enzyme ammonia monooxygenase that converts fixed ammonia to nitrite (via hydroxylamine) and the enzyme nitrite (oxido)reductase completes the oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, and both of these enzymes are entrained in the genome of A. digitifera (Table 8). The ammonia monooxygenase subunit A (amoA) of archaeal consorts has been described in nine species of coral from four reef locations [220], but the presence of amoA in the coral genome, together with encoded ammonium transport proteins, was not anticipated. Another protein of prokaryotic origin encoded in the coral genome is nitrate reductase (periplasmic, assimilatory and respiratory), the latter being required for anaerobic respiration by bacteria [221], and unlike the nitrate reductase family of sulphite oxidase enzymes in eukaryotes, the nitrate reductases of prokaryotes (K00363) belong to the DMSO reductase family of enzymes. Also encoded in the coral genome are a nitrite transporter (NirC) and a formate-dependent nitrite reductase (NrfA) required for nitrite ammonification [222]. In addition to nitrite reduction, NrfA reduces nitric oxide, hydroxylamine, nitrous oxide and sulphite, the last providing a metabolic link between nitrogen and sulphur cycling in coral metabolism. Other enzymes of nitrogen metabolism encoded in the coral genome are the carbamoyl-phosphate synthase family of enzymes [223] that catalyses the ATP-dependent synthesis of carbamoyl phosphate used for the production of urea (ornithine cycle) to provide a ready store of fixed-N in the urea-nitrogen metabolism of corals [224]. Another nitrogen source comes from glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) that reversibly converts glutamate to α-ketoglutarate with liberation of ammonia, and as expected [225], this enzyme is encoded in the coral genome, together with the prokaryotic nitrogen regulatory protein PII of glutamine synthase, which in bacteria is activated in response to nitrogen availability. Encoded also is histidine ammonia-lyase (histidase) that liberates ammonia (and urocanic acid) from cytosolic stores of histidine. It is now accepted that uric acid deposits accumulated by symbiotic algae provide a significant store of nitrogen for the coral holobiont [226], so it is noteworthy that the coral genome encodes urate oxidase (uricase) to catalyse uric acid oxidation to allanotoin from which urea and ureidoglycolate are produced in a reaction catalysed by allantoicase (allantoate amidinohydrolase), both of which known isoforms are present in the coral genome. Encoded in the coral genome is also urease to catalyse the hydrolysis of urea, presumably excreted by its algal symbionts, with the release of carbon dioxide and ammonia to meet the nitrogen demand of the coral holobiont during periods of low nitrogen availability. Similarly, xanthine dehydrogenase (xanthine: NAD+-oxidoreductase) acts by oxidation on a variety of purines, including hypoxanthine, to yield urate for the recycling of nitrogen in coral nutrition. Many of the aforementioned proteins of nitrogen metabolism, including Nif proteins, have been detected in the proteome of an endosymbiont-enriched fraction of the coral S. pistillata[39].

Notwithstanding consideration of the rapid diffusion rate of nitric oxide (NO) or its apparent short biological half-life [227], there is debate about the provenance of endogenously produced NO in signalling the bleaching of corals in response to environmental stress. Elevated nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and NO production in algal symbionts has been attributed to the thermal stress response of corals [228,229], whereas the host is ascribed to be the major source of NO during exposure to elevated temperature [230,231]. While our annotation may not resolve this dispute, we show (Table 8) that nitric oxide synthase enzymes (Nor D, Nor E, Nor Q and an invertebrate NOS protein) are encoded in the genome of A. digitifera, together with a nitric oxide-interacting protein (NOIP) that in higher animals regulates neuronal NOS activity [232]. Nitric oxide is an intermediate of nitrite reduction catalysed by nitrite reductase (NIR), which by further reduction produces ammonia. The coral genome also encodes nitric oxide dioxygenase (NOD) that converts nitric oxide to nitrate. Accordingly, enhanced expression of NIR (NO reduction) or NOD (NO oxidation) could ameliorate the NO-signalling response of coral bleaching presumed activated by environmental stress.

DNA repair

Cellular DNA is prone to damage caused by the products of normal metabolism and by exogenous agents. Damage to DNA from metabolic processes include the oxidation of nucleobases and strand interruptions by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), from alkylation of nucleotide bases, from the hydrolysis of bases causing deamination, depurination and depyrimidination, and from the mismatch of base pairs from errors in DNA replication. Damage affected by external agents include exposure to UV light causing pyrimidine dimerization and free radical-induced damage, exposure to ionising radiation causing DNA strand breaks, thermal disruption causing hydrolytic depurination and single-strand breaks, and by xenobiotic contamination to cause DNA adduct formation, nucleobase oxidation and DNA crosslinking. Most of these lesions affect structural changes to DNA that alter or prevent replication and gene transcription at the site of DNA damage. Thus, recognition and repair of DNA abnormalities are vital processes essential to maintain the genetic integrity of the coral genome. Since there are multiple pathways causing DNA damage at diverse molecular sites, there are likewise diverse and overlapping processes available to repair cellular DNA damage. Of the many nuclear repair processes, photoreactivation (photolyase), base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair are the main elements for the repair of cellular DNA damage.

Exposure to sunlight is an absolute requirement for phototrophic symbiosis, but excessive exposure of corals to solar ultraviolet radiation can inflict direct damage to DNA by pyrimidine dimerization and 6-4 photoadduct formation and cause indirect damage by the production of ROS to initiate free-radical damage. While there have been abundant studies on the sensitivity of corals to solar ultraviolet radiation, only a few have examined the effects of solar UV to cause DNA damage. Photoreactivation has been shown to be an important repair pathway for reversing UV-activated DNA damage in adult coral [233] and coral planulae [234]. UV damage to DNA was first demonstrated by the detection of unrepaired cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in the host tissues and algal symbionts of the coral Porities porites, in which CPDs had increased in a UV dose-dependent manner [235], whereas CPDs and 6-4 pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoadducts in the coral Montipora verrucosa holobiont were correlated inversely with levels of coral “sunscreen” protection [236]. The effects of solar UV radiation causing DNA lesions in coral have been determined by use of the comet assay [237], and UV-induced DNA damage and repair has been examined in the symbiotic anemone Aiptasia pallida[238]. The comet assay showed also that DNA lesions in coral planulae had increased on acquiring algal symbionts, presumably from greater ROS production resulting as a by-product of photosynthesis [239]. Iron-induced oxidative stress was found likewise to enhance DNA damage in the coral Pocillopora damicornis as determined by the occurrence of DNA apurinic/apyrimidinic sites caused by hydrolytic lesions [240]. Significantly, DNA damage in the host and algal symbionts of the coral Montastraea faveo-lata was found to occur simultaneously during thermal “bleaching” stress, and DNA damage is further enhanced on exposure to greater irradiances of solar radiation [241]. Nevertheless, despite the serious risk of unrepaired DNA damage to coral survival, the DNA repair processes of corals to mitigate the detrimental effects of environmental stress have not been adequately characterised at the transcriptome level of expression [29,242].

Our annotation of the sequenced genome of A. digitifera has revealed genes encoding a large repertoire of DNA repairing enzymes and their adaptor proteins (Table 9). Given strong evidence for DNA photoreactivation in corals having been reported [233,234], it was surprising to find only one gene in single copy that encodes a sole photolyase enzyme for reversing pyrimidine dimer and 6-4 photoadduct formation. Notably, we found genes encoding 6 members of the ERCC family of nucleotide excision repair enzymes, together with the UV excision repair protein RAD23, for the repair of UV-induced DNA damage. More abundant are the DNA mismatch repair enzymes from the MLH, MSH, Mut and PMS protein families and related glycosylase/lyase proteins for repairing erroneous insertion, deletion and mis-incorporation of bases to arise during DNA replication and recombination. There is additionally a specific gene that encodes a 3′-endonuclease protein that has a preference to correct mispaired nucleotide sequences. Abundant also are other members of the RAD-family of DNA repair proteins, including 28 sequence copies of a gene encoding the RAD50 protein for DNA double-strand break repair that, together with members of the MRE, Rec, REV, Swi5/Sae3, XRCC and XRS families of recombination and polymerase proteins, have complementary roles in DNA repair. Apparent also in the genome are the DNA helicase proteins, including RuvB–like proteins, which are primarily involved in DNA replication and transcription, but assist also in the repair of DNA damage by separating double strands at affected sites of DNA damage to facilitate repair. Of the multiple families of ATP-dependent DNA helicase proteins encoded in the coral genome, RecQ and helicase Q predominate. Encoded in the coral genome are 5 homologues of the DNA repair alkB proteins that reverse damage to DNA from alkylation caused by chemical agents by removing methyl groups from 1-methyl adenine and 3-methyl cytosine products in single-stand DNA. Annotated also are genes encoding DNA ligase 3 for repairing single-strand breaks, DNA ligase 4 to repair double-strand breaks, and a DNA cross-link repair 1C protein with single-strand specific endonuclease activity that may serve in a proofreading function for DNA polymerase. Taken together, expressing this arsenal of DNA protection may provide corals with limited ability to transcribe gene-encoded adaptation to a changing global environment.

Table 9.

DNA repair proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.02961; v1.13402
K03575
A/G-specific adenine glycosylase (MutY)
v1.11766
K03919
Alkylated DNA repair protein
v1.04821
K10765
Alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homologue 1
v1.02479
K10766
Alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homologue 4
v1.20302
K10767
Alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homologue 5
v1.24450
K10768
Alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homologue 6
v1.02766; v1.09413
K10770
Alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homologue 8
v1.01590 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K10884
ATP-dependent DNA helicase 2 subunit 1
v1.18810; v1.03166; v1.08449
K10885
ATP-dependent DNA helicase 2 subunit 2
v1.08013
K03722
ATP-dependent DNA helicase DinG
v1.03542
K14635
ATP-dependent DNA helicase MPH1
v1.06737 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K15255
ATP-dependent DNA helicase PIF1
v1.17360; v1.21235
K10899
ATP-dependent DNA helicase Q1
v1.01081 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K10730
ATP-dependent DNA helicase Q4
v1.16859
K10902
ATP-dependent DNA helicase Q5
v1.11661 [+ 19 other sequence copies]
K03654
ATP-dependent DNA helicase RecQ
v1.20397
K03656
ATP-dependent DNA helicase Rep
v1.18049; v1.07731; v1.05830
K10905
ATR interacting protein
v1.01679
K01669
Deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase
v1.03410; v1.12968; v1.00865; v1.16876
K10887
DNA cross-link repair 1C protein
v1.07474; v1.07473; v1.01809
K10610
DNA damage-binding protein 1
v1.13116; v1.03378; v1.16328
K10140
DNA damage-binding protein 2
v1.17099 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K11885
DNA damage-inducible protein 1
v1.05469
K06663
DNA damage checkpoint protein
v1.02859; v1.14719; v1.21030; v1.10920
K04452
DNA damage-inducible transcript 3
v1.02191
K10844
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-2
v1.19108 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K10843
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-3
v1.22267 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K10848
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-4
v1.15137 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K10846
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-5
v1.18550; v1.02606; v1.14935; v1.08831
K10841
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-6
v1.20045; v1.01844; v1.11724; v1.03203
K10570
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-8
v1.15430; v1.03058
K03658
DNA helicase IV
v1.00228 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K11665
DNA helicase INO80
v1.00136; v1.0678; v1.21529
K10776
DNA ligase 3
v1.23293; v1.19418; v1.23430; v1.15721
K10777
DNA ligase 4
v1.19248
K07458
DNA mismatch endonuclease, patch repair protein
v1.19011
K08739
DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3
v1.11513; v1.11449
K08735
DNA mismatch repair protein MSH2
v1.14781
K08736
DNA mismatch repair protein MSH3
v1.05696; v1.22444; v1.19162
K08740
DNA mismatch repair protein MSH4
v1.04904
K08741
DNA mismatch repair protein MSH5
v1.15360; v1.19426; v1.08585
K08737
DNA mismatch repair protein MSH6
v1.02429 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K03572
DNA mismatch repair protein MutL
v1.03990
K03555
DNA mismatch repair protein MutS
v1.14015
K07456
DNA mismatch repair protein MutS2
v1.08443
K10864
DNA mismatch repair protein PMS1
v1.15229
K10858
DNA mismatch repair protein PMS2
v1.08658; v1.14152; v1.01681
K15082
DNA repair protein RAD7
v1.16407 [+ 27 other sequence copies]
K10866
DNA repair protein RAD50
v1.22193
K04482
DNA repair protein RAD51
v1.02646; v1.22076
K10958
DNA repair protein RAD57
v1.15671 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04483
DNA repair protein RadA
v1.16193; v1.19033
K04485
DNA repair protein RadA/Sms
v1.16079; v1.07685
K04484
DNA repair protein RadB
v1.21363; v1.22360; v1.02900
K03584
DNA repair protein RecO (recombination protein O)
v1.18390
K03515
DNA repair protein REV1
v1.04705
K10991
DNA repair protein Swi5/Sae3
v1.13920; v1.03800; v1.16133
K10803
DNA repair protein XRCC1
v1.15052
K10879
DNA repair protein XRCC2
v1.09315 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K10886
DNA repair protein XRCC4
v1.02733; v1.24592
K10868
DNA repair protein XRS2
v1.14551; v1.23176
K10873
DNA repair and recombination protein RAD52
v1.20503 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K10875
DNA repair and recombination protein RAD54
v1.23173; v1.16050
K10877
DNA repair and recombination protein RAD54B
v1.07227; v1.08907; v1.09439; v1.02644
K10847
DNA repair protein complementing XP-A cells
v1.11534 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K10865
Double-strand break repair protein MRE11
v1.07939
K03660
N-glycosylase/DNA lyase
v1.16163
K03652
3-Methyladenine DNA glycosylase
v1.07231
K10726
Replicative DNA helicase Mcm
v1.05482
K04499
RuvB-like protein 1 (pontin 52)
v1.19813
K11338
RuvB-like protein 2
v1.06890
K15080
Single-strand annealing weakened protein 1
v1.17193; v1.14087
K03111
Single-strand DNA-binding protein
v1.15575
K10800
Single-strand monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase
v1.07134
K10992
Swi5-dependent recombination DNA repair protein 1
v1.13860
K03649
TDG/mug DNA glycosylase family protein
v1.14423; v1.14399; v1.05070
K03648
Uracil-DNA glycosylase
v1.23838
K10791
Three prime repair exonuclease 2
v1.19522 K10839 UV excision repair protein RAD23

Stress response proteins

Annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals a wide assortment of thermal shock proteins, molecular chaperones and other stress response elements that are given in (Table 10), excluding antioxidant and redox-protective proteins which are described in the next section. Heat shock proteins 70 kDa, 90 kDa, 110kDA, HspQ and HspX (the last two proteins being homologues of the bacterial heat shock factor sigma32 and α-crystallin, respectively) are encoded in the coral genome, together with several HSP gene transcription factors. HSPs play a role in various cellular functioning such as protein folding, intracellular protein trafficking and resistance to protein denaturation. HSP expression is usually increased on exposure to elevated temperatures and other conditions of biotic and abiotic stress that include infection, inflammation, metabolic hyperactivity, exposure to environmental toxicants, ultraviolet light exposure, starvation, hypoxia and desiccation [243]. HSPs and chaperones are transcriptionally regulated and are induced by heat shock transcription factors [244], of which there are several encoded in the coral genome. Since HSPs are found in virtually all living organisms, it is not surprising that cnidarian hsp transcription and protein expression (HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90) have been profiled as a stress determinant [245-250] and early warning indicator of coral bleaching [251-254]. The coral genome reveals also a cold shock protein encoded by the cspA gene family, but profiling its expression with other stress response proteins activated by sub-optimum cold temperatures [255] has not been reported. Additionally, the coral genome encodes transcription of a homologue of the universal stress protein A (UspA), a member of an ancient and conserved group of stress-response proteins [256,257], which have been studied mostly in bacteria [258] but have been described also in several plants [259] and animals, including members of the Cnidaria [260]. Usp transcripts have been quantified in the thermal stress response of the coral Montastraea faveolata[261] and its aposymbiotic embryos [262]. Another gene product of potential interest is a homologue of the oxidative-stress responsive protein 1 (OXSR1) that belongs to the Ser/Thr kinase family of proteins, as do other mitogen-stress activated protein kinases (MAPKs), that regulate downstream kinases in response to environmental stress [263] by interacting with the Hsp70 subfamily of proteins [264]. Another significant response protein encoded in the coral genome (Table 10) is a homologue of the stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (30 domain sequence alignments), known also as the Hsp70-Hsp90 organising protein (HOP) belonging to the stress inducible (STI1) family of proteins, which is a principle adaptor protein that mediates the functional cooperation of molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90 [265,266]. It is yet to be determined if Hop1 transcription may serve as a primary indicator of environmental stress in corals.

Table 10.

Stress response proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.04616; v1.06277
K03694
ATP-dependent Clp protease subunit ClpA
v1.04617; v1.23486; v1.23484; v1.10207
K03695
ATP-dependent Clp protease subunit ClpB
v1.13464
K03697
ATP-dependent Clp protease subunit ClpE
v1.06903; v1.11461
K06891
ATP-dependent Clp protease adaptor protein ClpS
v1.12577; v1.09531; v1.17184
K03544
ATP-dependent Clp protease subunit ClpX
v1.09407
K08054
Calnexin (protein-folding chaperone)
v1.16781
K08057
Calreticulin (Ca2+-binding chaperone)
v1.04005
K10098
Calreticulin 3 (Ca2+-binding chaperone)
v1.02702[+ 5 other sequence copies]
K03704
Cold shock protein (beta-ribbon, CspA family)
v1.01907; v1.18998
K07213
Copper chaperone
v1.23457; v1.01713; v1.19228
K04569
Copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase
v1.08719; v1.19128
K09502
DnaJ homologue subfamily A member 1
v1.08719; v1.18432
K09503
DnaJ homologue subfamily A member 2
v1.16210; v1.22054
K09504
DnaJ homologue subfamily A member 3
v1.19128
K09505
DnaJ homologue subfamily A member 4
v1.04818 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K09506
DnaJ homologue subfamily A member 5
v1.02841; v1.02842
K09507
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 1
v1.00368; v1.13308; v1.16977; v1.03340
K09508
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 2
v1.11537; v1.09205; v1.08628; v1.02840
K09511
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 5
v1.24549 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
K09512
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 6
v1.01573
K09513
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 7
v1.00352; v1.09196; v1.06645
K09514
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 8
v1.18536 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K09515
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 9
v1.14710
K09517
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 11
v1.14959
K09518
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 12
v1.09205
K09519
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 13
v1.16242
K09520
DnaJ homologue subfamily B member 14
v1.20109; v1.03468
K09521
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 1
v1.07111 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K09522
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 2
v1.21077 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K09523
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 3
v1.07739; v1.22910
K09524
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 4
v1.01239 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K09525
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 5
v1.17629 [+ 29 other sequence copies]
K09527
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 7
v1.18619; v1.08300; v1.23789
K09528
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 8
v1.13575; v1.04213
K09529
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 9
v1.05956; v1.05955; v1.21265; v1.21205
K09530
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 10
v1.13525; v1.04120
K09531
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 11
v1.09496 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K09533
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 13
v1.24546
K09534
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 14
v1.05866
K09536
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 16
v1.16151; v1.08307; v1.14980
K09537
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 17
v1.16309
K09539
DnaJ homologue subfamily C member 19
v1.05241; v1.22999; v1.17372
K14258
Facilitated trehalose transporter (anhydrobiosis)
v1.12967; v1.19789
K14590
FtsJ methyltransferase [heat shock protein]
v1.02247
K09414
Heat shock transcription factor 1
v1.24112
K09416
Heat shock transcription factor 3
v1.05839
K09419
Heat shock transcription factor, other eukaryote
v1.12890 [+ 10 other sequence copies]
K03283
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1/8
v1.07996
K09489
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4
v1.02854; v1.07452; v1.01623
K09490
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 5
v1.14149; v1.14150
K09487
Heat shock protein 90 kDa beta
v1.07995; v1.07996; v1.16399; v1.11283
K09485
Heat shock protein 110 kDa
v1.08943; v1.05577
K11940
Heat shock protein HspQ
v1.00537; v1.00043
K03799
Heat shock protein HtpX
v1.01623
K04046
Hypothetical chaperone protein
v1.16216
K08268
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha
v1.08869; v1.15120
K09097
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 beta
v1.22724
K09095
Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha
v1.23698 [+ 16 other sequence copies]
K06711
Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase
v1.16737; v1.22345
K09486
Hypoxia up-regulated 1 (heat shock protein 70 family)
v1.10188
K08900
Mitochondrial chaperone BCS1
v1.17197; v1.04394
K04445
Mitogen-stress activated protein kinases
v1.16301; v1.21224; v1.19344
K04043
Molecular chaperone DnaK
v1.09682; v1.16748; v1.07471; v1.13624
K03687
Molecular chaperone GrpE
v1.01621; v1.04945; v1.15919
K04044
Molecular chaperone HscA
v1.18210
K04083
Molecular chaperone Hsp33
v1.17478; v1.16977; v1.10289; v1.19907
K04079
Molecular chaperone HtpG
v1.08895; v1.18099
K11416
Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase sirtuin 6
v1.02024
K11411
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1
v1.04813
K11412
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 2
v1.22049; v1.22211; v1.02221
K11413
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 3
v1.11849; v1.02221
K11414
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 4
v1.05495
K11415
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 5
v1.04868
K11417
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 7
v1.15070 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K08835
Oxidative-stress responsive protein 1 (OXSR1)
v1.04503
K11875
Proteasome assembly chaperone 1
v1.01531
K11878
Proteasome assembly chaperone 4
v1.01210
K11879
Proteasome chaperone 1
v1.18611
K11880
Proteasome chaperone 2
v1.00599 [+ 29 other sequence copies]
K09553
Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 (HOP1)
v1.08830
K13057
Trehalose synthase (anhydrobiosis)
v1.22042
K03533
TorA specific chaperone
v1.16986 [+ 7 other sequence copies] K06149 Universal stress protein A

Molecular chaperones are a diverse family of proteins expressed by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms that serve to maintain correct protein folding in a 3-dimensional functional state, assist in multiprotein complex assembly and protect proteins from irreversible aggregation at synthesis and during conditions of cellular stress [267]. Additionally, heat shock proteins and their co-chaperones may regulate cell death pathways by inhibition of apoptosis [268]. The coral genome encodes a large number of DnaJ subfamily (J-domain) chaperones (Hsp40) that with co-chaperone GrpE (Table 10) regulates the ATPase activity of Hsp70 (DnaK in bacteria) to enable correct protein folding [269]. The coral genome encodes homologues of the molecular chaperones HscA (specialised Hsp70), the redox-regulated chaperone Hsp33, HtpG (high temperature protein G), members of the calnexin/calreticulin chaperone system of the endoplasmic reticulum, a mitochondrial chaperone BCS1 protein necessary for the assembly of the respiratory chain complex III and a specific chaperone of trimethyl N-oxide reductase (TorA). The coral genome also encodes hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) that moderate the deleterious effects of hypoxia on cellular metabolism (reviewed in [270]). In the HIF signalling cascade, the alpha subunits of HIF are hydroxylated at conserved proline residues by HIF prolyl-hydroxylases allowing their recognition for pro-teasomal degradation, which occurs during normoxic conditions but is repressed by oxygen depletion. Hypoxia-stabilised HIF1 upregulates the expression of enzymes principally of the oxygen-independent glycolysis pathway, and in higher animals promotes vascularisation, whereas the mammalian HIF2 paralogue regulates erythropoietin control of hepatic erythrocyte production in response to hypoxic stress [271]. The roles of HIF1 and HIF2 homologues in corals have been established, with HIF1 regulation of glycolysis critical to metabolic function during the dark diurnal anoxic state of coral respiration [193,272].

Heat shock proteins that repair unfolded or misfolded protein have a complementary function to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (ubiquitins not tabulated) that selects damaged protein for degradation [273], such that HSP chaperones and the proteasome act jointly to preserve cellular proteostasis [274,275]. Thus, several proteasome chaperones and assembly chaperones are encoded in the A. digitifera genome (Table 10). While proteasome chaperones serve to target aberrant proteins for ubiquination, the proteasome chaperones facilitates 20S assembly for biogenesis of the multiunit 26S proteasome that is activated in response to stress [276,277], possibly by FtsJ (aka RrmJ), a well-conserved heat shock protein having novel ribosomal methyltransferase activity that targets methylation of 26S rRNA under heat shock control [278,279]. The HspQ protein encoded in the coral genome, although studied almost exclusively in bacteria, is known to stimulate degradation of denatured proteins caused by hyperthermal stress, particularly DnaA that initiates DNA replication in prokaryotes [280]. Specifically, HspQ (heat shock factor sigma32) regulates the expression of Clp ATPase-dependent protease family enzymes [281,282], of which ClpA, ClpB, ClipE, the protease adaptor protein ClpS [283] and the unfoldase ClpX protein [284] are encoded in the coral genome (Table 10). HspX is a small 16 kDa α-crystallin chaperone (Acr) protein belonging to the Hsp20 family of proteins [285] that suppresses thermal denaturation and aggregation of proteins [285]. Significantly, Acr proteins are known to bind with carbonic anhydrase [286] and may have importance in moderating stress-induced loss of calcium deposition. Thus, HspX/Acr expression may account for differences in the thermal sensitivity of corals to calcification that varies among genera [287]. In a different context, HspX is attracting considerable attention for its potential to elicit long-term protective immunity against human Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by chaperoning a host-protective antigen [288] that by extension, but yet untested, may likewise repress virulence in the initiation and progression of microbial coral disease [289,290].

The coral genome encodes complete membership of the human sirtuin (SIRT1-7) family of NAD(+)-dependent protein deacetylases and ADP-ribosyltransferases. Mammalian SIRT1 (a homologue of yeast Sir2) is an important regulator of metabolism, cell differentiation, stress response transcription and pathways of cellular senescence (reviewed in [291]). SIRT proteins regulate chromatin function through deacetylation of histones that promote subsequent alterations in the methylation of histones and DNA to affect, via deactivation of nuclear transcription factors and co-regulators, epigenetic control of nuclear transcription. As NAD+-dependent enzymes, SIRT1 can regulate gene expression in response to cellular NAD+/NADH redox status providing a metabolic template for epigenetic transcriptome reprogramming [292,293]. In the human genome repertoire, SIRT1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylation of HIF1α [294] and inhibits nitric oxide synthesis by suppression of the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) signalling pathway [295], SIRT2 promotes oxidative stress resistance by deacetylation of forkhead box O (FOXO) proteins [296], SIRT3 decreases ROS production in adipocytes [297], SIRT4 regulates fatty acid metabolism and stress-response elements of mitochondrial gene expression [298], SIRT5 is a protein lysine desuccinylase and demalonylase of unknown function [299], SIRT6 activates base-excision repair [300] and SIRT7 inhibits apoptosis induced by oxidative stress by deacylation of p53 [301,302]. The significance of coral SIRT proteins, by analogy, to exert stress tolerance is yet to be examined.

Metallochaperones are an important class of enzymes that transport co-factor metal ions to specific proteins [303]. The copper chaperone protein ATX1 (human ATOX1) delivers cytosolic copper to Cu-ATPase proteins and serves as a metal homeostasis factor to prevent Fenton-type production of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals. ATX1, which is strongly induced by molecular oxygen, functions additionally as an antioxidant to protect cells against the toxicity of both the superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide [304]. Encoded also is a specific copper chaperone essential to the activation of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase [305,306] that is enhanced by photooxidative stress in scleractionian corals [307], although reported to be less pronounced in the host than in symbiotic algae [308]. In addition to high light exposure, reef-building corals of shallow reef flats are occasionally exposed to the atmosphere for periods that can last several hours during extreme low tides. Hence, species that are adapted to withstand acute desiccation (anhydrobiosis) have a better chance of surviving such conditions. The disaccharide trehalose is an osmolyte that in some plants and animals allows them to survive prolonged periods of desiccation [309]. The hydrated sugar has high water retention that forms a gel phase when cells dehydrate, which on rehydration allows normal cellular activity to resume without damage that would otherwise follow a dehydration/rehydration cycle. Furthermore, trehalose is highly effective in protecting enzymes in their native state from inactivation from thermal denaturation [310]. Given that A. digitifera is endemic on shallow reef flats prone to exposure at low tides [311], it is not surprising that the coral genome encodes trehalose synthase and a facilitated trehalose transporter for protection against dehydration.

Antioxidant and redox-protective proteins

Oxygen is vital for life, but it can also cause damage to cells, particularly at elevated levels. In coral symbiosis, the photosynthetic endosymbionts of corals typically produce more oxygen than the holobiont is able to consume by respiration, so that coral tissues are hyperoxic with tissue pO2 levels often exceeding 250% of air saturation during daylight illumination [193]. Furthermore, because algal symbionts reside within the endodermal cells of their host, coral tissues must be transparent to facilitate the penetration of downwelling light required for photosynthesis by their algal consorts. In clear shallow waters this entails concurrent exposure to vulnerable molecular sites of both partners to damaging wavelengths of ultraviolet radiation. The synergistic effects of tissue hyperoxia and UV exposure can cause oxidative damage to the symbiosis via the photochemical production of cytotoxic oxygen species [312] that are produced also during normal mitochondrial function [313]. Consequently, protective proteins (antioxidant enzymes) are expressed to maintain the fine balance between oxygen metabolism and the production of potentially toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). If this balance is not maintained by regulation of oxidative and reductive processes (redox regulation), oxidative stress occurs by the generation of excess ROS, causing damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids. Corals elaborate a variety of molecular defences that including the production of UV-protective sunscreens, (MAAS), antioxidants, antioxidant enzymes, chaperones and heat shock proteins, which are often inducible under conditions of enhanced oxidative stress [307], including conditions that elicit coral bleaching [314,315]. An excellent review on the formation of ROS and the role of antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes in the field of redox biology is given by Halliwell [316].

Annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals sequences encoding two isoforms of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) from both the Cu/Zn and Fe/Mn families of SOD (Table 11). These metalloprotein enzymes catalyse the dismutation of superoxide to yield molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, the latter being less harmful than superoxide. Superoxide can oxidize proteins, denature enzymes, oxidize lipids and fragment DNA. By removing superoxide, SOD protects also against the production of reactive peroxynitrite formed by the combination of superoxide and nitric oxide, which is a precursor reactant for production of the supra-reactive hydroxyl radical. Hydrogen peroxide per se is a mild oxidant, but it readily oxidises free cellular ferrous iron to ferric iron with production of hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction. Accordingly, both the removal of hydrogen peroxide and the expression of proteins, such as transferrin, (bacterio)ferritins and metallothioneins, that bind reactive (transition) metal ions is important to protect cellular components from acute oxidative damage. Oddly, only a metallothionein expression activator was found encoded in the coral genome without finding a sequence to activate transcription of the actual metallothionein protein gene.

Table 11.

Antioxidant and redox-protective proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.10918
K04756
Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit D
v1.11551
K03387
Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit F
v1.07812
K03594
Bacterioferritin
v1.21362 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K00429
Catalase (bacterial)
v1.17525 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K03781
Catalase (peroxisonal)
v1.23457; v1.01713; v1.19228
K04569
Copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase
v1.20153; v1.20154
K10528
Hydroperoxide lyase
v1.19687; v1.19688; v1.18796; v1.18795
K00522
Ferritin heavy chain
v1.06441
K03674
Glutaredoxin 1
v1.19449
K03675
Glutaredoxin 2
v1.14929 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K03676
Glutaredoxin 3
v1.13285; v1.03722; v1.03688; v1.10496
K00432
Glutathione peroxidase
v1.13174; v1.13775; v1.05473
K00383
Glutathione reductase (NADPH)
v1.14344; v1.19399; v1.01421
K01920
Glutathione synthase
v1.02173
K09238
Metallothionein expression activator
v1.09719; v1.16134; v1.18608
K07390
Monothiol glutaredoxin
v1.14890; v1.17685
K07305
Peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase
v1.14909
K00435
Peroxiredoxin
v1.14106
K13279
Peroxiredoxin 1
v1.08691
K11187
Peroxiredoxin 5, atypical 2-Cys peroxiredoxin
v1.01410
K11188
Peroxiredoxin 6, 1-Cys peroxiredoxin
v1.03688
K05361
Phospholipid-hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase
v1.05148
K05905
Protein-disulfide reductase
v1.02922; v1.22772; v1.24164
K05360
Protein-disulfide reductase (glutathione)
v1.06810
K12260
Sulfiredoxin
v1.01713 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04565
Superoxide dismutase, Cu/Zn family
v1.09974; v1.20324
K04564
Superoxide dismutase, Fe/Mn family
v1.02378
K11065
Thiol peroxidase, atypical 2-Cys peroxiredoxin
v1.22324 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K03671
Thioredoxin 1
v1.05148; v1.03230; v1.20699
K03672
Thioredoxin 2
v1.17881 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K13984
Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5
v1.04532; v1.24501
K09585
Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 10
v1.11551; v1.19049
K00384
Thioredoxin reductase (NADPH)
v1.10930 K14736 Transferrin

As expected from the foregoing, the genome of A. digitifera encodes the antioxidant enzyme catalase (CAT) that is highly efficient in decomposing hydrogen peroxide to yield molecular oxygen and water. Two isoforms of CAT are encoded at multiple sites. One is a peroxisomal eukaryotic CAT enzyme that targets the removal of hydrogen peroxide formed as a by-product of oxidase enzymes, and the other is a related catalase domain-containing protein presumed also to decompose hydrogen peroxide. Glutathione peroxidise (GPx) reduces both hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides, the latter of which are formed by radical-induced lipid autoxidation. Phototrophic organisms, including higher plants, utilise ascorbate peroxidase (APx) as a primary catalyst for the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides. However, unlike the freshwater cnidarian H. viridis[164], there is no evidence for transfer of APx-encoding genes to A. digitifera. The antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT, GPx and APx are well characterised in the algal and animal partners of coral symbiosis (reviewed in [317]). Additionally, the coral genome has sequences encoding alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, hydroperoxide lyase, phospholipid-hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase, thiol peroxidase and multiple isoforms of peroxiredoxin, all of which function in the detoxification of organo-hydroperoxides that are produced as a by-product of aerobic metabolism. Additionally, sulfiredoxin (Table 11) repairs peroxiredoxins when these enzymes are inhibited by over-oxidation [318].

Thioredoxins and glutaredoxins have important secondary roles in regulating multiple pathways in many biological processes, including redox signalling of apoptotic pathways, which have been attributed to processes involved in coral bleaching [56]. Other enzymes that regulate cellular thiol-disulfide homeostasis in this coral are monothiol glutaredoxin and protein-disulfide reductase. The coral genome encodes the ubiquitous thioredoxin system of antioxidant proteins (Table 11) that act as electron donors to peroxidases and ribonucleotide reductase (the latter not tabulated). By cysteine thiol-disulfide exchange, thioredoxins function as a protein thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase [319]. In the thioredoxin system, thioredoxins are maintained in their reduced state by NADPH-dependent, flavoenzyme thioredoxin reductase [320]. Peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase can additionally rescue thioredoxin from oxidative inactivation by disulfide reduction. Related glutaredoxins share many of the functions of thioredoxins but are reduced directly by glutathione, rather than by a specific reducing enzyme, while in turn glutathione is kept in its native state by NADPH: glutathione reductase.

In recent years there has been a particular focus on the role of ROS in coral bleaching, fuelled by dire prediction of future catastrophic episodes caused by environmental change affected by global warming [321]. Early predictions of coral bleaching were based principally on physical environmental parameters, rather than on the determination of the physiological state of coral populations to such conditions. While gene expression markers are being developed to monitor sub-bleaching levels of stress in situ (e.g., [261]), Kenkel et al. [322] opined that the current challenge for implementing expression-based methods lies in identifying coral genes demonstrating the most pronounced and consistent stress response, preferably with a large dynamic range to enable reliable quantification. To this end, we offer in Table 11 the annotation of novel redox-related genes for examination as potential candidate biomarkers to monitor the physiological response of A. digitifera to environmental stress.

Proteins of cellular apoptosis

Apoptosis is the signalling of programmed cell death (PCD) that occurs in multicellular organisms in response to cellular injury. A key feature of apoptosis is the activation of endogenous endonucleases causing nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation and chromosomal DNA fragmentation, which typically presents in affected cells by the morphological appearance of plasma membrane blebbing and cell shrinkage. Caspases and related family member proteases are described as “executioners” of apoptosis that on post-translational activation degrade the regulatory proteins that prevent DNA degradation. Fragmentation of nuclear DNA is one of the hallmarks of apoptotic cell death that occurs by PCD stimuli in a wide variety of proliferating cells. NF-κB is a protein complex that controls the transcription of DNA that can induce the expression of nitric oxide synthesis (NOS) to produce NO that is a well-known promoter of the of the pro-apoptotic transcription factor p53 cell-cycle gatekeeper of the caspase cascade. In contrast to necrosis, which is the outcome of PCD, apoptosis mediates the fragmentation of damaged cells, which by phagocytosis are removed or degraded in phagolysosomes to spare surviving cells from the uncontrolled release of cytotoxic agents. Proteins of the caspase-mediated apoptotic cascade are regarded as products of constituent housekeeping genes that are necessary to maintain healthy multicellular function [323]. In the progression of cnidarian bleaching, apoptotic pathways are activated [322-325], but not all corals that suffer bleaching are destined to die [326,327]. Coral survival has been attributed to having a high level of apoptotic protection at the onset of coral bleaching [328] and during post-bleaching recovery [329] by specific activation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins in surviving cells [330].

Cnidarians have a complex apoptotic protein network that has exceptional ancestral complexity and is comparable to that of higher vertebrates [331,332]. Cnidarian metamorphosis is tightly coupled with caspase-dependent apoptosis [333] and subsequent host-symbiont selection by post-phagocytic winnowing of Symbiodinium genotypes during the establishment of coral-dinoflagellate mutualism [334]. As expected, the coral genome of A. digitifera encodes multiple isoforms of genes that transcribe the caspase family of apoptotic effectors (Table 12). Included in this signalling pathway are the pro- and anti-apoptotic Bax/Bcl regulators and Bcl-2 athanogene (DNA-binding) activators of apoptosis. Notable in our annotation dataset are multiple genes that encode the protein domains of the apoptotic protease-activating factor (Apaf) that triggers assembly of the apoptosome leading to caspase activation [335]. Additional to this arsenal of cell cycle regulators are the death associated protein-6 (DAXX), a Fas-binding adaptor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation [336], death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), a mediator of calcium/calmodulin-regulated Ser/Thr kinase [337], and the programmed cell death 6-interacting protein (PDCD6IP), which binds to PDCD-6 for execution of apoptosis via the caspase-3 pathway [338]. PDCD6IP activation of apoptosis is an enigma since PDCD-6 is not encoded in the coral genome, nor is caspase-3. Other cell cycle regulators are the p53 binding and p53-associated parkin-like proteins, and the activating TP53 regulating kinase protein and TP53 apoptosis effector of TP53 gene expression.

Table 12.

Proteins of cellular apoptosis in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.17521; v1.02505; v1.20702; v1.05077
K02159
Apoptosis regulator BAX (BCL2-associated)
v1.05086; v1.20659
K02161
Apoptosis regulator BCL-2
v1.17522; v1.00181; v1.10817; v1.20703
K02163
Apoptosis regulator BCL-W
v1.05147 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K12875
Apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer
v1.22264 [+ 72 other sequence copies]
K02084
Apoptotic protease-activating factor (Apaf)
v1.17326; v1.20305; v1.11586
K09555
BCL2-associated athanogene 1
v1.08601
K09558
BCL2-associated athanogene 4
v1.02839
K09559
BCL2-associated athanogene 5
v1.01518
K13087
BCL2-associated transcription factor 1
v1.20278; v1.00172; v1.07858
K14021
BCL-2 homologueous antagonist/killer
v1.09624
K02561
BCL2-related (ovarian) killer protein
v1.17749
K08573
Calpain-3
v1.00595; v1.14671; v1.00040
K08574
Calpain-5
v1.00040
K08575
Calpain-6
v1.19153; v1.17749
K08576
Calpain-7
v1.15226
K04740
Calpain-12
v1.02951
K08582
Calpain-15
v1.11167; v1.06681; v1.20230; v1.01376
K08585
Calpain, invertebrate
v1.0312 7 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K08583
Calpain, small subunit 1
v1.17229; v1.00023; v1.09976
K02186
Caspase 2
v1.11989 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K04397
Caspase 7
v1.02756 [+ 27 other sequence copies]
K04398
Caspase 8
v1.01818
K04399
Caspase 9
v1.00817 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04400
Caspase 10
v1.02005
K04741
Caspase 12
v1.00818 [+ 11 other sequence copies]
K04489
Caspase apoptosis-related cysteine protease
v1.13260
K07367
Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 11
v1.06297 [+ 44 other sequence copies]
K02832
CASP2 and RIPK1 adaptor with death domain
v1.21531
K02308
Death-associated protein 6 (DAXX)
v1.09448; v1.15529; v1.20164
K08803
Death-associated protein kinase (DAPK)
v1.23110; v1.14222; v1.03658
K12366
Engulfment and motility protein 1 (phagocytosis/apoptosis)
v1.18448 [+ 78 other sequence copies]
K02373
Fas (TNFRSF6)-associated via death domain (FADD)
v1.24288 [+ 66 other sequence copies]
K10130
Leucine-rich repeats and death domain-containing protein
v1.20620
K04734
NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha
v1.01706
K14214
NF-kappa-B inhibitor delta
v1.10378; v1.10729; 1.05609; v1.05609
K05872
NF-kappa-B inhibitor epsilon
v1.17893; v1.22419; v1.00700; v1.08415
K09256
NF-kappa-B inhibitor-like protein 1
v1.04158 [+ 211 other sequence copies]
K09257
NF-kappa-B inhibitor-like protein 2
v1.05320; v1.06979; v1.04467; v1.21371
K02580
Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit
v1.20334; v1.22743
K11970
p53-Associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein
v1.14920; v1.11864; v1.15271; v1.11865
K06643
p53-Binding protein
v1.04289
K06708
Programmed cell death 1 ligand 2
v1.05882 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K12200
Programmed cell death 6-interacting protein (PDCD6!P)
v1.10959; v1.04994
K04727
Programmed cell death 8 apoptosis-inducing factor
v1.16714
K06875
Programmed cell death protein 5 (PDCD-5)
v1.13112
K03171
Tnfrsf1a-associated via death domain
v1.24655; v1.12385
K10136
TP53 apoptosis effector
v1.09087
K08851
TP53 regulating kinase
v1.05030; v1.07044
K11859
Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3
v1.22799
K04389
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 6
v1.05776
K05470
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 7
v1.13754
K05472
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 9
v1.21776 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K04721
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10
v1.04001
K05473
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11
v1.19776
K05474
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 12
v1.09015; v1.14041
K03158
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A
v1.07010
K05141
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B
v1.19735
K05142
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4
v1.13754
K03160
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 5
v1.22577
K05143
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6B
v1.20003
K05144
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 7
v1.23750; v1.17970; v1.19022
K05146
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9
v1.07527
K05148
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11B
v1.10221
K05151
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13C
v1.14826; v1.01054
K05152
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 14
v1.09514
K05156
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19
v1.01640
K05161
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 26
v1.08207; v1.16237; v1.14824 K10133 Tumor protein p53-inducible protein 3

Our genome annotation reveals 73 sequence matches for expressing the Apaf protein domain that, in conjunction with a high copy number for expressing caspase-8 (28 protein sequence matches), may enhance coral survival during embryogenesis by suppressing receptor-induced protein kinase (45 sequence matches) during early development [339]. The most conserved function of the CAPS2/RIPK adaptor (45 sequence matches) encoded in the coral genome is its essential regulation of apoptosis [340]. We find a wide repertoire of genes that additionally encode proteins that mediate apoptosis (Table 12). Amongst these are the calpain Ca+2-sensing family of proteins that initiate the signalling of apoptotic pathways [341]. There are 79 matches to sequences that encode the tumor necrosis Fas superfamily member 6 (TNFRSF6) receptor, which coupled with the death domain (FADD) protein is a cell signalling mediator for recruitment of caspase-8 that activates the apoptotic cysteine protease cascade. Coincident in the genome are 67 sequences encoding the leucine-rich repeat and death domain-containing (LRDD) adaptor that, by interacting with other p53-inducible death domain-containing (PIDD) proteins such as FADD, induces the caspase-2 pathway of apoptosis in response to DNA damage [342]. Elements of the NF-κB signalling pathway of cnidarians are highly conserved traits [343], which includes the caspase cascade and the pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family of proteins [344]. The coral genome of A. digitifera encodes the pleiotropic nuclear factor NF-κB p105 subunit, and astonishingly there are 212 sequence matches to the NF-κB inhibitor-like protein 2 domain with fewer matches to the NF-κB inhibitor-like protein 1 and NF-κB family inhibitors alpha, delta and epsilon. Evident in our genome annotation is the tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3), a cytokine produced by activated (inflammatory) macrophages. Although TNF cytokines are a major extrinsic mediator of cellular apoptotic pathways, the precise function of the superfamily members of TNF ligands and receptors (Table 12) remains elusive in coral symbiology.

Microbial symbiosis and pathogenicity

It is well established that corals associate with a vast consortia of microbes, including phototrophic symbionts (Symbiodinium spp.) and other eukaryotic microbionts, cyanophytes, heterotrophic bacteria, archaea and viruses [345]. Corals harbour diverse and abundant prokaryotic communities with distinct populations residing in separate habitats of the host skeleton, tissues and surface mucus layer (reviewed in [203]). Microbial populations are dominated by a few coral-specific taxonomic traits [346], but the majority of the population comprises a high number of taxonomically diverse, low-abundance ribotypes [347] with much of the diversity within the coral microbiome belonging to the “rare” biosphere [348,349]. The coral microbiome is vital to the nutrition and health of the holobiont [350] and contributes significantly to the protection of coral reef ecosystems against the detrimental effects of organic enrichment [351,352]. One emerging threat to coral reefs is the outbreak of infectious diseases (reviewed in [353]). Although highly subjective and with little experimental evidence to date, the coral probiotic hypothesis [354] suggests that the coral prokaryotic microbiome can adapt to changing environmental conditions by selective microbial reorganisation to impart greater resistance to disease and pathogen-mediated bleaching [355]. Whether the coral microbiome can respond to changing environmental conditions more rapidly than by host genetic mutation and selection based on contemporary phenotypic evolution on ecological time-scales [356], is a topic of current debate [357].

Corals, like other invertebrates, have an innate immune system based on self-histocompatibility recognition (reviewed in [358]), but to date few adaptive components have been identified [359]. Corals do not produce antibodies and thus lack a true adaptive immune system. Nonetheless, corals once susceptible to infection and bleaching caused by a specific bacterial agent can become immune to the invading pathogen by a phenomenon termed “experience-mediated tolerance”, a precept of the hologenome theory of evolution [360], although how this process occurs is largely unknown. In our annotation of the genome sequence of A. digitifera we uncovered genes encoding the expression of disease resistance proteins (Table 13), two of which match the plant RPM1 and RPS2 pathogen resistance proteins that guard against disease by binding with pathogen avirulence receptors [360,361]. Significant also is a gene to express the pathogenesis-related protein PR-1 (29 sequence domain matches) that is inducible in plants for systemic acquired resistance to pathogenic invasion [362]. We uncovered also multiple genes encoding the expression of myeloperoxidase (MPO) enzymes. MPOs produce hypochlorous acid from hydrogen peroxide and chloride ion (requiring heme as a cofactor), and it oxidizes tyrosine to the tyrosyl radical using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizing agent. Hypochlorous acid and tyrosyl radicals are strong cytotoxic agents that in higher organisms are used as a primary defence by neutrophils to protect against invading pathogens. Phenoloxidase (tyrosinase) activity is reported to contribute to the innate defence system of A. millepora and Porites sp. [363] via activation of the melanin-signalling pathway that is induced in response to coral bleaching and localised disease [364,365]. Three genes of A. digitifera encode tyrosinase enzymes (data not tabulated) to account for the phenoloxidase activity reported in corals.

Table 13.

Microbial symbiosis and pathogenicity proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.06126
K13061
Acyl homoserine lactone synthase
v1.19990
K01372
Bleomycin hydrolase
v1.00209; v1.06178
K03587
Cell division protein FtsI (penicillin-binding protein 3)
v1.18860
K13458
Disease resistance protein
v1.16231; v1.00374; v1.08191
K13457
Disease resistance protein RPM1
v1.13482 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K13459
Disease resistance protein RPS2
v1.07889
K12090
Cag pathogenicity island protein 5
v1.24345
K12091
Cag pathogenicity island protein 6
v1.18924; v1.17622
K12093
Cag pathogenicity island protein 8
v1.05278
K12096
Cag pathogenicity island protein 11
v1.02083
K12104
Cag pathogenicity island protein 19
v1.12907
K12109
Cag pathogenicity island protein 24
v1.00209; v1.06178
K03587
Cell division protein FtsI (penicillin-binding protein 3)
v1.13874
K07259
Carboxy/endopeptidase (penicillin-binding protein 4)
v1.12514; v1.09758
K04127
Isopenicillin-N epimerase
v1.21332
K04126
Isopenicillin-N synthase
v1.07742
K02547
Methicillin resistance protein
v1.17478; v1.16977; v1.10289; v1.19907
K04079
Molecular chaperone HtpG (anti-bacterial)
v1.08255
K13651
Motility quorum-sensing regulator, GCU-specific toxin
v1.14792 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K10789
Myeloperoxidase
v1.02333 [+ 26 other sequence copies]
K13449
Pathogenesis-related protein 1
v1.05017
K03693
Penicillin-binding protein
v1.17507
K12556
Penicillin-binding protein 2X
v1.13874
K07259
Penicillin-binding protein 4
v1.16655
K02171
Penicillinase repressor
v1.14688
K15126
Type III secretion system cytotoxic effector protein
v1.20647
K03980
Virulence factor, integral membrane protein
v1.18964 K03810 Virulence factor, oxidoreductase domain

The genome of A. digitifera also reveals homologues of genes that promote bacterial pathogenicity (Table 13), including virulence factors that are expressed and excreted by invading pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa) to inhibit certain protective functions of the host. Such are the bacterial Type III cytotoxic effector protein and multiple Type IV Cag pathogenicity island proteins encoded in the coral genome. Many Gram-negative bacteria utilize Type III secretion proteins, which are regulated by quorum sensing, to deliver cytotoxic effector proteins into eukaryote host cells during infection. Cag (cytotoxin-associated) pathogenicity island (PAI) proteins are encoded by mobile genetic elements of the Type IV system secreting both proteins and large nucleoprotein complexes [366] that may be transferred between prokaryotes to enhance selected traits of virulence [367]. Our annotation reveals genes encoding six pathogenicity island proteins (Table 13) with similarity to the Cag PAI proteins of the human Heliobacter pylori, an infectious bacterium causing peptic ulcers that may lead to the development of stomach cancer. While many properties of Type III and IV secretion system proteins have been well characterized in bacteria, the functional purpose of homologous genes in A. digitifera, if expressed, are unknown.

The genome of A. digitifera contains genes of bacterial origin that encode the motility quorum-sensing regulator of the GCU-specific mRNA interferase toxin and acyl homoserine lactone synthesis used for the communication of quorum sensing between bacteria to enable the coordination of group behaviour based on collective population density. Apparent in our annotation (Table 13) is a wide array of microbial penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) that have an affinity for β-lactam antibiotics that by binding to PBPs prevent bacteria from constructing a cell wall. There are genes also to enhance antibiotic resistance, including potential expression of a penicillinase repressor, a methicillin resistance protein and bleomycin hydrolase (cysteine peptidase). Additionally, isopenicillin-N synthase and an isopenicillin-N epimerase, both of which catalyse key steps in the biosynthesis of penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics, are encoded in the coral genome. Taken as a whole, we demonstrate an extensive presence of ancient non-metazoan genes that are maintained in the genome of A. digitifera, as is reported in the genomes of A. millepora and the anemone N. vectensis[368]. Recent thought on genome evolution places these ancestral conserved domains as ‘orphan’ or ‘taxonomically restricted’ genes [352,369,370], rather than acquired later by horizontal gene transfer. There is, of course, little knowledge of how or when, if at all, these non-metazoan genes are expressed or even their function to mediate pathogenicity in the coral holobiont.

Proteins of viral pathogenicity

Marine viruses were of minor interest until 1989, when it was realised that virus-like particles (VLPs) are the most abundant biological entities to occupy aquatic environments with variable numbers reaching ~108 VLPs ml-1[371]. Typically, VLPs surpass the number of marine bacteria by an order of magnitude in coastal waters [372]; their diversity is extremely high and many are specific to the marine environment [373,374]. Significant VLP numbers are reported from the surrounding waters of oceanic coral reef atolls [375], in waters flowing across the reef substratum [376] and in samples taken within the close vicinity of coral colonies [377,378]. The viral load within the surface microlayer of scleractinian corals is enumerated as being 107-108 VLPs mL-1[379] and, based on VLP morphological diversity, is attributed to infecting various microbial hosts (bacteria, archaea, cyanobacteria, fungi and algae) residing within the coral mucus [380]. VLPs have been observed in the epidermal and gastrodermal tissues of corals and occasionally occur in the mesogloea [381]. Latent viruses were found to infect Symbiodinium isolated from several scleractinian corals [382-384] with a preponderance of eukaryotic algae-infecting phycodnaviruses suggested [385]. A wide range of bacteriophage and eukaryotic virus families have been identified within scleractinians using metagenomic analyses [207,386-388], with bacteriophages being by far the most abundant entities (Wood-Charlson EM, Weynberg KD, Suttle CA, Roux S, van Oppen MJH: Methodological biases in coral viromics, submitted).

The importance of the coral-virus interactome in bleaching and disease (reviewed in [185,389]) is founded on reports showing that VLP abundances are higher in the seawater immediately surrounding diseased compared to that of healthy corals [378], that latent viruses are induced by heat stress in symbiotic dinoflagellates of the sea anemone Anemonia virdis[382] and the coral Pavona danai[383], and that UV exposure induces a latent virus-like infection in cultured Symbiodinium[187]. Quantitative 454 pyrosequence analysis of the coral Porites compressa on exposure to reduced pH, elevated nutrients or thermal stress showed that the abundance of its viral consortia varied across treatments, but notably a novel herpes-like virus increased by up to 6 orders of magnitude on exposure to abiotic stress [387], although some caution may be warranted in assessing the reliability of such determinations [Wood-Charlson et al., submitted]. Unexpectedly, the proteome of an endosymbiont-enriched fraction of the coral Stylophora pistillata showed a significant 114-fold increase in a viral replication protein on thermal bleaching [39], which is consistent with the finding of VLP induction in P. compressa by similar treatment [387].

General aspects of histocompatibility [390-393] and the genetic structure of innate immune receptors of the Cnidaria [363,394-401], including the immune response effected by coral disease and bleaching [364,402], have been examined extensively, hence further elaboration here is unnecessary. Instead, we focus on proteins that directly regulate the pathogenicity of coral-associated microbes and viruses. The A. digitifera genome encodes protein homologues having either putative antiviral and virus-promoting activities (Table 14). These homologues include the antiviral “superkiller” helicase SKI2 protein that acts by blocking viral mRNA translation [403] and, together with the superkiller proteins SKI3 (69 sequence alignments) and SKI8 of the exosome complex, function in a 3′-mRNA degradation pathway [404]. The coral genome encodes also three exoribonuclease (RNase) enzymes (XRN, XRN2 and RNB) with antiviral RNA-degrading properties [405,406]. Annotation of the coral genome reveals homologues to four interferon proteins (IFNB, IFNG, IFNW1 and IFNT1). Interferons are potent and selective antiviral cytokines [407], which are induced by viral infection or by sensing dsRNA, a by-product of viral replication, leading to the transcription of interferon-stimulated genes whose products have antiviral activities and others having antimicrobial, antiprolifera-tive/antitumor or immumomodulatory effects [408,409]. Included in the coral antivirus defence system are three members of the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF1, IRF2 and IRF8) family proteins. IRF1 and IRF2 are transcriptional activators of cytokines and other target genes [410]; IRF1 is known to trans-activate the tumor suppressor protein p53 [411] while IRF2 regulates post-transcriptional induction of NO synthase [412]. Conversely, IRF8 is an interferon consensus sequence-binding protein that is a negative (interference) regulator of enhancer elements common to interferon-inducible genes [413]. The coral genome additionally includes an interferon-stimulated 20 kDa protein (ISG20) RNase specific to deactivation of singled-stranded RNA viruses [414]. The coral genome encodes several interferon-inducible proteins, notably interferon gamma induced GTPase (IGTP) that accumulates in response to IFNB [415], the interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 that is a key element of host antiviral defence [416], the interferon-induced helicase C domain-containing protein1 (aka MDA-5), which is an immune receptor that senses viral dsRNA to activate the interferon antiviral-response cascade [417] and the interferon-induced transmembrane protein (IFITM1) that suppresses cell growth [418]. The coral genome encodes the interferon-gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2) transmembrane protein that activates downstream signal transduction cascades that control cell proliferation and apoptosis [419]. Encoded also is a homologue of the human bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST2) that inhibits retrovirus infection by preventing VLP release from infected cells [420]. Additionally encoded is a mitochondrial antiviral-signalling protein (MAVS) that triggers the host immune response by activation of the nuclear transcription factor NF-kB and the interferon regulatory transcription factor IRF3 which coordinates the expression of type-1 interferons such as IFNB [421].

Table 14.

Regulatory and related proteins of viral pathogenicity in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.20647; v1.06188; v1.21287
K12599
Antiviral helicase SKI2
v1.18443 [+ 40 other sequence copies]
K12807
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 1 (BIRC1)
v1.06263 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K04725
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 2/3/4 (BIRC2/3/4)
v1.14355
K08731
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (BIRC5)
v1.04171 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K10586
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 6 (BIRC6)
v1.12348; v1.01945; v1.16612
K06731
Bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (antiviral BST2)
v1.01539 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K04012
Complement component receptor 2 (CR2)
v1.17305
K04462
Ecotropic virus integration site 1 protein (EVI1)
v1.1496 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K12618
5′-3′ Exoribonuclease 1 (antiviral XRN1)
v1.22746; v1.19002; v1.12850; v1.21216
K12619
5′-3′ Exoribonuclease 2 (antiviral XRN2)
v1.09005
K01147
Exoribonuclease II (antiviral RNB)
v1.22793; v1.12978; v1.19008; v1.20838
K09239
HIV virus type I enhancer-binding protein (HIVEP)
v1.02776 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K15046
Influenza virus NS1A-binding protein (NS1A-BP)
v1.09829; v1.13077
K05415
Interferon beta (IFNB)
v1.11946; v1.21512; v1.11221; v1.11927
K04687
Interferon gamma (IFNG)
v1.21512
K14140
Interferon gamma induced GTPase (ITGP)
v1.11946
K05133
Interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2)
v1.01539 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K04012
Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1
v1.10782; v1.23797; v1.17119; v1.03221
K12647
Interferon-induced helicase C domain-containing protein 1
v1.06274; v1.15849; v1.05943
K06566
Interferon induced transmembrane protein (IFITM1)
v1.21327; v1.24081
K05440
Interferon, omega 1 (IFNW1)
v1.11817
K09444
Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1)
v1.11816; v1.07639
K10153
Interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF2)
v1.11421
K10155
Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8)
v1.02158
K12579
Interferon-stimulated gene 20 kDa protein (ISG20)
v1.15947
K05442
Interferon tau-1 (IFNT1)
v1.22825; v1.08034; v1.08520
K05788
Integration host factor subunit beta (IHFB)
v1.14899
K08220
MFS transporter, FLVCR family virus subgroup C receptor
v1.04514; v1.04513; v1.16929
K12648
Mitochondrial antiviral-signalling protein (MAVS)
v1.17718; v1.08002; v1.08001; v1.22382
K06081
Poliovirus receptor-related protein 1 (PVRL1)
v1.21413; v1.06637
K06531
Poliovirus receptor-related protein 2 (PVRL2)
v1.11740; v1.21467; v1.11410; v1.17135
K06592
Poliovirus receptor-related protein 3 (PVRL3)
v1.15077
K06593
Poliovirus receptor-related protein 4 (PVRL4)
v1.04158 [+ 68 other sequence copies]
K12600
Superkiller protein 3 (antiviral SHI3)
v1.18238 [+ 4 other sequence copies] K12601 Superkiller protein 8 (antiviral SHI8)

The coral genome encodes a full set of baculoviral IAP repeat-containing proteins BIRC 1-6 (Table 14). The IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) family proteins were first identified secreted by baculovirus to protect infected cells from death in the progression of viral replication [422]. Expressed by most eukaryotic organisms (reviewed in [423]), their IAP function is presumably conserved in corals. The coral genome encodes a full set of poliovirus receptor-related proteins (PVRL1-4) of the immunoglobulin superfamily, which bind and transport herpesviruses at the cellular membrane in the establishment of latent infections (reviewed in [424]). Encoded also is a complement component (3d/Epstein Barr virus) receptor 2 (CR2) protein that binds to the Epstein-Barr virus Herpes viridae with antigenic activity for disease prevention [425]. Another encoded protein is a homologue of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enhancer-binding protein (HIVEP; aka EBP1) that attaches to the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) region to activate transcription via the HIV LTR [426]. Present in the coral genome is also a homologue of the influenza virus non-structural binding protein NS1A-BP that interacts with the NS1 virulence factor of the influenza A virus Orthomyxoviridae to interfere with NS1-inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing within the host nucleosome [427]. NS1A-BP inhibits NS1A-mediated disruption of the host immune response caused by restricting interferon production and the antiviral effects of IFN-induced proteins [428]. The genome of A. digitifera encodes an integration host factor subunit beta (IHFB), first discovered as a host factor for bacteriophage λ integration of mobile genetic elements, that in E. coli is involved in multiple processes of DNA replication, site-specific recombination and gene expression [429]. A homologue of the MFS transporter feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor (FLVCR) cell surface protein is encoded in the coral genome, which in cats confers susceptibility to FeLV-C infection [430]. Encoded also is a viral integration site 1 (EVI1) that in humans is an oncogenic transcription factor, often activated by viral infection, to cause proliferation of invasive tumours [431]. Arguably, these homologue proteins typically expressed in such distantly related species may have similar relevance in viral interactions of the coral holobiome.

How these regulatory proteins and viral receptors interact and respond to viral infection in corals is yet to be realised. The absence of virion-specific sequences (e.g. for nucleic acid replication or capsid structure) suggests that proviral DNA is absent from the coral genome, or it may be an artefact of the limited number of marine viral sequences deposited in public databases. Discovery of viral activity through proteomics [39] may, therefore, suggest that viral proteins are synthesised from a lytic infection, but this requires confirmation.

Toxins and venom

A review of protein sequences deposited in the UniProt database in October 2012 shows that there are 150 known cnidarian toxins. These toxins have diverse biological activities (neurotoxins, pore-forming cytolysins and venom phospholipases) used to capture prey and for protection against predators [432] that are best characterised in sea anemones (Actiniaria) with 141 sequences deposited [433,434]. The cytotoxin MCTx-1 isolated from the Net Fire Coral Millepora dichotoma is the only toxin from a coral deposited in Uniprot (accession number A8QZJ5). However, our initial examination of the predicted proteome of A. digitifera shows 18 proteins with similarity to bacterial toxins and associated regulatory proteins (Table 15). Unlike reports from proteomic examination of the coral S. pistillata[39] and nematocysts (stinging organelles) of the jellyfish Olindias samba-quiensis[435], Tamoya haplonema, Chiropsalmus quadrumanus, Chrysaora lactea (PF Long et al., pers comm), by sea anemones [434] and by the highly dangerous box jellyfish Chironex fleckeri[436,437], no venoms typical of higher animals were found in the A. digitifera genome. This was because our annotation was carried out using the KEGG database (release v58 [53]) to relate A. digitifera protein sequences to KEGG orthologues. The KEGG database is a collection of proteins from well characterised and ubiquitous biochemical pathways. Animal venoms, however, are highly specialised proteins for which this release of the KEGG database does not contain any described orthologues.

Table 15.

Proteins homologous to bacterial toxins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.20214
K11029
Anthrax edema toxin adenylate cyclase (CyaA)
v1.17686
K10921
Cholera toxin transcriptional activator (ToxR)
v1.13017
K11020
Exotoxin A (ToxA)
v1.23507
K13655
HTH-type transcriptional regulator (MsqA) antitoxin for MqsR
v1.21184
K11009
Murine toxin (Ymt)
v1.04313
K11033
Non-hemolytic enterotoxin A (NheA)
v1.08011
K11034
Non-hemolytic enterotoxin B/C (NheBC)
v1.08255
K13651
Motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR) interferase toxin
v1.15986
K11059
Probable enterotoxin A (EntA)
v1.13046
K04392
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1)
v1.13966
K11007
Shiga toxin subunit B (StxB)
v1.23958
K11063
Toxin A/B (TcdAB)
v1.21174
K10930
Toxin co-regulated pilin (TCP)
v1.05802
K10961
Toxin co-regulated pilus biosynthesis protein I (TcpI)
v1.21783
K10964
Toxin co-regulated pilus biosynthesis protein S (TcpS)
v1.14688
K15126
Type III secretion system cytotoxic effector protein (BteA)
v1.05520
K11028
Vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA)
v1.06590 K10954 Zona occludens toxin (Zot)

KEGG orthology-based annotation of the A. digitifera genome reveals genes encoding protein homologues of 10 bacterial toxins, 7 regulatory toxin proteins and a botulinum protein substrate (Table 15). Of the 9 toxin homologues, one with similarity to anthrax edema factor (EF) adenylate cyclase (CyaA) is one of three proteins that comprise the anthrax toxin of Bacillus anthracis, the other two being a protective antigen (PA) and lethal factor (LF). Without the LF protein, anthrax CyaA has no known toxic effects in animals [438], although the EF protein does play an important role in disabling cellular functions vital for microbial host defences [439]. The A. digitifera genome encodes a secretion virulence factor exotoxin A-like protein produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which for this bacterium affects local tissue damage, bacterial invasion and immunosuppression within their eukaryote host [440] with pathogenicity similar to that of the diphtheria toxin [441]. Another encoded protein is a murine-like toxin (Ymt) produced by the enterobacterium Yersinia pestis, which is the causative agent responsible for transmission of the notorious bubonic plague [442]. Additionally, two hemolytic enterotoxins similar to NheA and NheBC produced by Bacillus cereus[443], an enterotoxin (EntA) similar to that of Staphylococcus aureus[444], a Shiga-like enterotoxin (StxB) produced by Shigella dysenteria, the diarrhoea-causing toxin A/B (TcdAB) such as that secreted by Clostridium difficile[445], and a protein similar to the zonula occludens (tight junction) enterotoxin (Zot) secreted by Vibrio cholera[446] are encoded in the A. digitifera genome. Within the predicted proteome is also a homologue of the vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA) produced by Helicobacter pylori that colonises the gastric mucosa of the human stomach epithelium [447].

Although a direct homologue of the cholera toxin (CT) was not found encoded in the A. digitifera genome (Table 15), a protein similar to its transcriptional activator ToxR was. ToxR not only controls the expression of CT in Vibrio cholera[448], but also a co-regulated pilin (TcpA) protein that is under control of the ToxR regulon cascade [449]. Bacterial TcpA protein is assembled into toxin-coregulated pili that induce the transfer of DNA by horizontal exchange of genetic material during conjugation [450]. TcpA and two toxin co-regulated biosynthetic proteins (TcpI and Tcps) of the bacterial virulence-associated pilus appendage [451] are encoded in the coral genome. Entrained also are the motility quorum-sensing interference regulator MsqR and its transcriptional regulator MsqA that in Eschericia coli controls biofilm formation by inhibiting quorum-sensing motility, and together the MqsR/MqsA complex represses the lethal cold shock-like protein cspD gene [452] that on expression impairs DNA replication [453]. The A. digitifera genome likewise encodes a Type III secretion system T3SS cytotoxic effector (BteA) protein [454] that in Gram-negative invasive bacteria is translocated into host cells to suppress innate immunity to enhance virulence [455,456]. However, the ecophysiological significance of these toxigenic proteins and allied regulators, if indeed expressed by the coral genome, is unknown.

In addition to using the KEGG database, we undertook a BLAST search of the predicted proteome of A. digitifera against peptide sequences for all animal venoms using the annotated UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Tox-Prot program [457]. This search revealed a large number of accession hits from the predicted proteome, although these are unlikely to be true multiple copies given that the genome sequence has yet to be completely assembled. However, just taking a single accession number from each annotation reveals a complex array of 83 toxins that represents the predicted venom of A. digitifera (Table 16); UniProt BLAST E-values are given in Additional file 1: Table S16b. These venoms are highly diverse and are significantly homologous to toxins from a wide variety of venomous marine and terrestrial creatures such as fish, reptiles, other cnidarians, cone-snails, stinging insects and even a venomous mammal (Shrew), covering the complete range of pharmacological properties known in venoms, including cytolytic, neurotoxic, haemotoxic, phospholipase, proteinase and proteinase inhibitor activities. Both the number of toxins predicted in the venom of A. digitifera and the degree of homology to such widely divergent phyla is remarkable. Accordingly, cnidarian venoms may possess unique biological properties that might generate new leads in the discovery of novel pharmacologically active drugs. Gene duplication followed by mutation and natural selection is widely held as the key mechanism whereby the large diversity of toxins found within a single venom could have evolved [458,459]. Conversely, primary mRNA splicing patterns have been shown to account for the diversity of metallopro-teinases in the pit viper Bothrops neuwiedi[460]. Variations in peptide processing have also been shown by proteomics and transcriptomics to explain how a limited set of genes transcripts could generate thousands of toxins in a single species of cone snail [461]. Despite these various processes that could account for the evolution of toxin diversity, it has never been demonstrated how gene duplications or variations in transcript or peptide processing could have radiated across the very different poisonous creatures found on Earth. Our data (Table 16) reveal that the predicted toxins of A. digitifera venom are orthologues to all of the most important superfamilies of peptide/protein venoms found in diverse taxa. We posit that the origins of toxins in the venoms of higher organisms may have arisen from deep eumetazoan innovations and that the molecular evolution of these venom super gene families can now be addressed taking an integrated venomics approach using Cnidaria such as the jellyfish as model systems [462].

Table 16.

UniProt-predicted homologues of animal venom proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

Gene sequence UniProt toxin accession Animal with closest homology
v1.01916 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
Q92035; Acetylcholinesterase
Bungarus fasciatus (Banded Krait)
v1.06761; v1.08075; v1.09840; v1.20323
Q9IAM1; Agkisacutacin (subunit anticoagulant protease)
Deinagkistrodon acutus (Sharp-nosed Viper)
v1.04809
A8QL52; L-Amino acid oxidase
Bungarus fasciatus (Banded Krait)
v1.06380
Q4JHE1; L-Amino acid oxidase
Pseudechis australis (Mulga Snake)
v1.10291
P81383; L-Amino acid oxidase
Ophiophagus hannah (King Cobra)
v1.14412
A6MFL0; L-Amino acid oxidase
Demansia vestigiata (Lesser Black Whipsnake)
v1.16469
P81383; L-Amino acid oxidase
Ophiophagus hannah (King Cobra)
v1.23477
P81382; L-Amino acid oxidase
Calloselasma rhodostoma (Malayan Pit Viper)
v1.16440
C5NSL2; Bandaporin (haemolysin)
Anthopleura asiatica (Sea Anemone)
v1.16571 [+ 10 other sequence copies]
Q76B45 ; Blarina toxin (vasoactive protease)
Blarina brevicauda (Northern Short-Tailed Shrew)
v1.06055 [+ 20 other sequence copies]
Q593B6; Coagulation factor V
Pseudonaja textilis (Eastern Brown Snake)
v1.07831; v1.10094 ; v1.20732
P14530; Coagulation factor IX
Protobothrops flavoviridis (Okinawa Habu Snake)
v1.01708 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
Q4QXT9; Coagulation factor X
Tropidechis carinatus (Rough-Scaled Snake)
v1.09601; v1.10410
Q93109; Equinatoxin-5 (cytolysin)
Actinia equina (Beadlet Anemone)
v1.06821
Q08169 ; Hyaluronidase
Apis mellifera (European Honey Bee)
v1.08924
I0CME7; Hyaluronidase, Conohyal-Cn1
Conus consors (Singed Cone)
v1.06189 [+ 112 other sequence copies]
Q9XZC0; α-Latrocrustotoxin Lt1a (neurotoxin)
Latrodectus tredecimguttatus (Mediterranean Black Widow Spider)
v1.02942 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
G0LXV8; α-Latrocrustotoxin Lh1a (neurotoxin)
Latrodectus hasseltii (Australian Redback Spider)
v1.00644 [+ 32 other sequence copies]
Q25338; Δ- Latroinsectotoxin Lt1a (neurotoxin)
Latrodectus tredecimguttatus (Mediterranean Black Widow Spider)
v1.07446
A7X3X3; Lectin, Lectoxin Enh4 (platelet binding)
Enhydris polylepis (Macleay’s Water Snake)
v1.20653
A7X3Y6; Lectin, Lectoxin Enh7 (platelet binding)
Enhydris polylepis (Macleay’s Water Snake)
v1.02561,v1.11493; v1.16681
A7X3Z4; Lectin, Lectoxin Lio1 (platelet binding)
Liophis poecilogyrus (Water Snake)
v1.13597; v1.08696; v1.10757; v1.20654
A7X3Z7; Lectin, Lectoxin Lio2 (platelet binding)
Liophis poecilogyrus (Water Snake)
v1.18386, v1.15479
A7X413; Lectin, Lectoxin Lio3 (platelet binding)
Liophis poecilogyrus (Water Snake)
v1.06094
A7X406; Lectin, Lectoxin Phi1 (platelet binding)
Philodryas olfersii (Green Cobra)
v1.06416; v1.16248; v1.23712
A7X3Z0; Lectin, Lectoxin Thr1 (platelet binding)
Thrasops jacksonii (Black Tree Snake)
v1.17681
Q6TPG9; Lectin, Mucrocetin (platelet binding)
Protobothrops mucrosquamatus (Brown Spotted Pit Viper)
v1.00077 [+ 14 other sequence copies]
Q66S03; Lectin, Nattectin (platelet binding)
Thalassophryne nattereri (Toad Fish)
v1.12241; v1.02332; v1.12298
Q71RQ1; Lectin, Stejaggregin-A (platelet binding)
Trimeresurus stejnegeri (Bamboo Viper)
v1.02245 [+ 19 other sequence copies]
A0FKN6; Metalloprotease, Astacin-like toxin
Loxosceles intermedia (Recluse Spider)
v1.03638; v1.14772
Q90391; Metalloprotease, Atrolysin
Crotalus atrox (Western Diamondback Rattlesnake)
v1.13106
D3TTC2; Metalloproteinase, Atragin
Naja atra (Chinese Cobra)
v1.11132
Q7T1T4; Metalloproteinase, BjussuMP-2
Bothrops jararacussu (Jararacussu Pit Viper)
v1.02168
O73795; Metalloproteinase, Disintegrin
Gloydius brevicaudus (Chinese Mamushi Snake)
v1.06910
Q7SZE0; Metalloproteinase, Disintegrin
Gloydius saxatilis (Rock Mamushi Snake)
v1.22282
P14530; Metalloproteinase, Disintegrin
Protobothrops flavoviridis (Okinawa Habu Snake)
v1.03804
Q2UXQ5; Metalloproteinase, EoVMP2
Echis ocellatus (West African Carpet Viper)
v1.02016
Q91511; Mucrofibrase-5, Hypotensive serine protease
Protobothrops mucrosquamatus (Brown Spotted Pit Viper)
v1.09026
Q7ZZN8; Natrin-2 (neurotoxin)
Naja atra (Chinese Cobra)
v1.04153; v1.04595; v1.12730; v1.04157
A0ZSK3; Neoverrucotoxin (haemolysin)
Synanceia verrucosa (Reef Stone Fish)
v1.12433 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
A2VBC4; Phospholipase A1
Polybia paulista (Neotropical Social Wasp)
v1.00019; v1.13757
Q06478; Phospholipase A1 1
Dolichovespula maculata (Bald-Faced Hornet)
v1.09322; v1.09961; v1.13629
P0CH47; Phospholipase A1, Magnifin
Vespa magnifica (Giant Hornet)
v1.03556
P53357; Phospholipase A1 2
Dolichovespula maculata (Bald-Faced Hornet)
v1.13015; v1.16921
D2X8K2; Phospholipase A2
Condylactis gigantean (Giant Caribbean Sea Anemone)
v1.18628
Q9TWL9; Phospholipase A2, Conodipine-M
Conus magus (Magical Cone)
v1.11796
Q9PUH9; Phospholipase A2, Acidic S9-53 F
Austrelaps superbus (Lowland Copperhead Snake)
v1.09883
Q8AXW7; Phospholipase A2, Basic
Micrurus corallinus (Painted Coral Snake)
v1.14874
Q90WA8; Phospholipase A2, Basic 2
Bungarus fasciatus (Banded Krait)
v1.11797
P20256; Phospholipase A2, Basic PA-12C
Pseudechis australis (Mulga Snake)
v1.07278 [+ 34 other sequence copies]
Q7SZN0; Prothrombin activator Pseutarin-C
Pseudonaja textilis (Eastern Brown Snake)
v1.11045
P83370; Prothrombin activator Hopsarin-D
Hoplocephalus stephensii (Stephen’s Branded Snake)
v1.04104 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
Q58L94; Prothrombin activator Notecarin D2
Notechis scutatus (Tiger Snake)
v1.00387 [+ 9 other sequence copies]
Q58L90; Prothrombin activator Omicarin C
Oxyuranus microlepidotus (Inland Taipan )
v1.02137 [+ 38 other sequence copies]
Q58L91; Prothrombin activator Omicarin C
Oxyuranus scutellatus (Coastal Taipan)
v1.00618 [+ 10 other sequence copies]
Q58L93; Prothrombin activator Porpharin D
Pseudechis porphyriacus (Red-Bellied Black Snake)
v1.09896
P81428; Prothrombin activator Trocarin D
Tropidechis carinatus (Rough-Scaled Snake)
v1.13726
A6MFK7; Prothrombin activator Vestarin D1
Demansia vestigiata (Lesser Black Whipsnake)
v1.02129; v1.05362; v1.20273
Q6T269; Protease inhibitor, Bitisilin-3 (neurotoxic)
Bitis gabonica (Gaboon Viper)
v1.06980; v1.09028
Q3SB05; Pseudechetoxin (neurotoxin)
Pseudonaja textilis (Eastern Brown Snake)
v1.21284 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
D8VNS7; Ryncolin-1 (haemostasis inhibitor)
Cerberus rynchops (Dog-Faced Water Snake)
v1.18895 [+ 20 other sequence copies]
D8VNS8; Ryncolin-2 (haemostasis inhibitor)
Cerberus rynchops (Dog-Faced Water Snake)
v1.14251; v1.10489; v1.14254
D8VNS9; Ryncolin-3 (haemostasis inhibitor)
Cerberus rynchops (Dog-Faced Water Snake)
v1.06759 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
D8VNT0; Ryncolin-4 (haemostasis inhinitor)
Cerberus rynchops (Dog-Faced Water Snake)
v1.01273
Q9YGN4; Salmorin toxin (haemostasis inhibitor)
Gloydius brevicaudus (Chinese Mamushi Snake)
v1.09855; v1.09856
B2DCR8; SE-Cephalotoxin
Sepia esculenta (Golden Cuttlefish)
v1.16247
O13060; Serine protease, 2A
Trimeresurus gramineus (Bamboo Viper)
v1.08397; v1.09733
Q9DF66; Serine protease, 3 (haemostasis inhibitor)
Protobothrops jerdonii (Jerdon’s Pit Viper)
v1.03275
Q9DG84; Serine protease, Serpentokallikrein-2 (haemostasis inhibitor)
Protobothrops mucrosquamatus (Brown Spotted Pit Viper)
v1.16638
Q7SYF1; Serine protease, Cerastocytin (platelet binding)
Cerastes cerastes (Saharan Horned Viper)
v1.22320
P0C5B4; Serine protease, Gloshedobin (platelet binding)
Gloydius shedaoensis (Shedao Pit Viper)
v1.15074 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
B2D0J4; Serine protease, Venom dipeptidyl peptidase 4
Apis mellifera (European Honey Bee)
v1.05361
B6RLX2; Serine protease inhibitor, TCI (neurotoxin)
Ophiophagus hannah (King Cobra)
v1.10994
B7S4N9; Serine protease inhibitor, Taicatoxin (neurotoxin)
Oxyuranus scutellatus (Coastal Taipan)
v1.11218; v1.23374
Q90WA0; Serine protease inhibitor, Textilinin-2 (thrombin inhibitor)
Pseudonaja textilis (Eastern Brown Snake)
v1.17856; v1.22256
Q8T3S7; Serine protease inhibitor, U1-aranetoxin-Av1a (neurotoxin)
Araneus ventricosus (Devil Spider)
v1.04154 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
Q98989; Stonustoxin (haemostasis inhibitor)
Synanceia horrida (Estuarine Stonefish)
v1.09427; v1.16619; v1.19446
Q76DT2; Toxin AvTX-60A (cytolysin)
Actineria villosa (Okinawan Sea Anemone)
v1.12311
Q9GV72; Toxin CrTX-A (haemolysin)
Carybdea rastonii (Jimble Jellyfish)
v1.07546 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
P58911; Toxin PsTX-60 (haemolysin)
Phyllodiscus semoni (Night Anemone)
v1.11270; v1.14265
E2IYB3; Veficolin-1 (complement activator)
Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon)
v1.02115 Q98993; Verrucotoxin (cytolysin) Synanceia verrucosa (Reef Stonefish)

Detoxification proteins of the chemical defensome

There have been considerable advancements made to better understand the effects of pollution on coral reef habitats. The three main categories of environmental pollutants from anthropogenic sources are nutrient enrichment (eutrophication), hydrocarbon pollution and heavy metal contamination. Eutrophication from terrestrial inputs are a significant threat to coral reefs stemming from the discharge of treated sewage, the runoff of agricultural fertilizers (plus herbicides and pesticides), and by sedimentation caused by the erosion of organic-rich soils [463]. Notwithstanding that eutrophication can shift coral reef communities towards macroalgae domination [19], nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment can diminish coral growth and affect the photosynthetic performance of their algal symbionts [464]. Nutrient enhancement alters multiple pathways of primary metabolism that in coral is complicated by the photosynthetic demands of its symbiotic partners. While corals respond to hypertrophic levels of nutrients by activating general stress-response proteins [465], there are no specific proteins known to mitigate the cellular effects of nutrient enrichment on corals per se, and we have not attempted to identify such in this study.

Gene families and their regulators that defend against chemical stressors comprise the chemical defensome encoding a network of detoxifying proteins that allows an organism to sense, transform and eliminate potentially toxic endogenous metabolites and xenobiotic contaminants [466]. Expressed proteins of the chemical defensome include the biotransformation cytochrome P450 (CYP) family of enzymes, conjugating enzymes, efflux transporters, heavy metal membrane pump exporters and their transcriptional activators. Annotation of the genome of A. digitifera reveals multiple genes encoding 20 hemoproteins belonging to the Phase II cytochrome P450 superfamily of monooxidase enzymes that catalyse the oxidation of diverse organic substances (Table 17). The substrates of CYP enzymes include intermediates of lipid metabolism and sterol/steroid biosynthesis, and include the detoxification of exogenous xenobiotics. Of significance are the CYP1A-type (aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase) enzymes that have been studied widely in the hepatic response of fishes to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination (from crude or fuel oil) and exposure to polychlorinated biphenyl and dibenzodioxin toxicants (reviewed in [467]). CYP450 activity has been detected in the corals Favia fragum[468], Siderastrea siderea[469], Montastraea faveolata[470] and Pocillopora damicornis, [471]. Furthermore, CYP encoding sequences have been extracted from the genome of N. vectensis[472] and the transcriptome of A. millepora[29]. As well as providing chemical defence, mixed-function CYPs perform multiple endogenous tasks that are often taxon-specific. Hence, the orthology and substrate specificity of coral CYP enzymes cannot be predicted solely on homology to CYPs of known function assigned to higher metazoans. Similar to the function of CPY enzymes, there are genes encoding p-hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase, an oxidoreductase catalyzing aryl oxidation and the soluble and microsomal forms of epoxide hydrolase that converts epoxides, formed by the degradation of aromatic compounds, to trans-diols that by conjugation are readily excreted. Conjugating enzymes to eliminate hydroxylated substrates are the detoxifying UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and sulfotransferase families of enzymes. Estrone sulfotransferase is significant for inactivation of exogenous (contraceptive) estrogens [473] and similar endocrine-disruptive contaminants released from treated wastewater [474]; their occurrence in marine waters are known to disrupt the reproduction and development of fish [475] and corals [476]. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes catalyse the addition of reduced glutathione to the reactive sites of electrophilic toxins [477]. Surprisingly, only two isoforms of GST were detected in the A. digitifera genome (Table 17), whereas 18 distinct GST-encoding genes (6 classes + 1 fungal-type) were classified from genome sequences of N. vectensis[472]. This unexpected genome reduction of GST elaboration in A. digitifera begs further examination.

Table 17.

Proteins of the chemical defensome in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.06127; v1.06128
K01015
Alcohol sulfotransferase
v1.09267
K00537
Arsenate reductase
v1.24496; v1.24495; v1.03953
K03893
Arsenical pump membrane protein
v1.10691
K07755
Arsenite methyltransferase
v1.20443
K11811
Arsenical resistance protein ArsH
v1.14972
K01551
Arsenite-transporting ATPase
v1.17644; v1.00480; v1.08150; v1.22865
K01014
Aryl sulfotransferase
v1.21535; v1.11835; v1.02456
K01534
Cd2+/Zn2+-exporting ATPase
v1.03485; v1.21926; v1.05686
K01533
Cu2+-exporting ATPase
v1.22646 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K07408
Cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily A, polypeptide 1
v1.01284
K07421
Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily T
v1.10544; v1.02314, v1.17490
K07422
Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily U
v1.23039 [+ 13 other sequence copies]
K07422
Cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A
v1.07750
K07425
Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily A
v1.22798; v1.23000
K07426
Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily B
v1.02020 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K07427
Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily V
v1.19495
K07428
Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily X
v1.15382
K15002
Cytochrome P450, family 6
v1.16427
K07430
Cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily B
v1.17631
K00498
Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily A
v1.08074 [+ 4 other sequence copies]
K15004
Cytochrome P450, family 12
v1.02478 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K00512
Cytochrome P450, family 17, subfamily A
v1.06713
K07435
Cytochrome P450, family 20, subfamily A
v1.22414 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K07436
Cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily A
v1.20153
K12665
Cytochrome P450, family 26, subfamily C
v1.08074 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K00488
Cytochrome P450, family 27, subfamily A
v1.06537
K07439
Cytochrome P450, family 39, subfamily A
v1.22302 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K07440
Cytochrome P450, family 46, subfamily A
v1.16335
K09832
Cytochrome P450, family 710, subfamily A
v1.18439; v1.02594; v1.02593
K01016
Estrone sulfotransferase
v1.07758 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K00699
Glucuronosyltransferase
v1.00764
K13299
Glutathione S-transferase kappa 1
v1.17188
K00799
Glutathione S-transferase
v1.04140
K07239
Heavy-metal exporter, HME family
v1.10181
K00481
p-Hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase
v1.16748; v1.07471
K08365
MerR family transcriptional regulator, mercuric resistance
v1.04382; v1.24424
K13638
MerR family transcriptional regulator, Zn(II)-responsive
v1.12760
K08363
Mercuric ion transport protein
v1.04179; v1.01891; v1.00145
K03284
Metal ion transporter, MIT family
v1.21500 [+ 5 other sequence copies]
K01253
Microsomal epoxide hydrolase
v1.08005
K08970
Nickel/cobalt exporter
v1.03484
K08364
Periplasmic mercuric ion binding protein
v1.05406
K07245
Putative copper resistance protein D
v1.14635
K08726
Soluble epoxide hydrolase
v1.01929; v1.19296
K05794
Tellurite resistance protein TerC
v1.10880; v1.15709; v1.12348 K07803 Zinc resistance-associated protein

Many toxicological studies on the effects of pollution on cnidarian fitness have focused on their response to heavy metal contamination, including copper, cadmium, mercury and zinc [478,479]. In scleractinian corals the uptake and toxic effects of copper [480-483], cadmium [482] and mercury [484,485] have been studied at the metabolic level with specific studies to examine the effects of heavy metal toxicity on coral fertilisation [486-488], settlement [487], metamorphosis [486] and in coral bleaching [489]. Yet, the identification of molecular markers to monitor the response of Cnidaria to sub-lethal levels of heavy metal exposure has been elusive [490]. We were delighted to uncover in our annotation a wide range of genes to express metal-specific (arsenic, copper, mercury, nickel/cobalt and tellurium) resistance, transportation and membrane pump exporting proteins that, together with non-specific heavy metal ion export proteins (Table 17), might prove useful for monitoring the environmental response of A. digitifera to heavy metal contamination. Included in the heavy metal defensome are the Mer-family of transcriptional regulators of Hg- and Zn-resistance proteins and a periplasmic ion-binding protein attributed to the Hg detoxification system of bacteria [491]. Enzymes specific for arsenic detoxification are an arsenate oxidoreductase for conversion of arsenate to arsenite [492] and arsenite methyltransferase for conversion of arsenite to the less toxic dimethylarsenite that is amenable to excretion [493]. Such processes may enhance the resilience of corals exposed to natural [494] and site-affected [495] levels of arsenic contamination. In contrast, there were no (organo)cyanide detoxification genes apparent in the A. digitifera genome, but one sequence (v1.01601; K10814) encodes for hydrogen cyanide synthase of unknown metabolic purpose (data not tabulated). Ancillary evidence suggests that the expression of HCN synthase could be linked to quorum sensing [496] for regulating microbial densities of the coral holobiont community.

Epigenetic and DNA-remodelling proteins

In all Kingdoms of life, DNA methylation and chromatin remodelling is pivotal to the regulation of gene transcription independent of underlying allelic variation. One such process mediated by epigenetic changes in eukaryotic biology is the all-important cellular differentiation during morphogenetic development. Epigenetic modifications cause the activation, regulation or silencing of certain genes without changing the basic DNA code. Changes in epigenetic regulation can persist during cell division and across multiple generations [497]. In addition, cytosine methylation may be associated with a higher mutation rate, because deamination of the methylated base produces thymine resulting in C/T mutations, which on reproduction may be transmitted by the germline to subsequent generations in selective processes of evolution [498]. On the other hand, environmentally induced destabilisation of the epigenome can produce epigenetic gene variants (epialleles) that activate transcription and mobilization of DNA transposable elements, which may subsequently lead to stable heritable traits of environmental adaptation, as does occur by genetic imprinting in plants [499]. Transposition has thus the potential to direct increased frequencies of permanent genetic mutations for selective adaptation.

One way by which genes are regulated at the epigenome is through the remodelling of the chromatin histone-DNA complex (the nucleosome), which by post-translational modification changes the template structure of DNA associated histone proteins. These modifications are affected by histone-lysine (and histone-arginine) N-methyltransferase enzymes (Table 18) by which these proteins may be further modified by acetylation, ADP-ribosylation, ubiquination, and phosphorylation (annotation not tabulated). The methylation pattern of histone lysine residues is highly predictive of the gene expression states of transcriptional activation and repression [500]. Necessary epigenomic reprogramming of histone modification at different stages of cell development is affected by the activation of histone and lysine-specific demethylase enzymes (Table 18). Determinants for recognition of the histone code are being revealed by a growing body of experimental data providing valuable information on the molecular tractability of binding sites involved in epigenetic signalling [501], which will enhance further insight to epigenetic function.

Table 18.

Epigenetic and DNA-remodelling proteins in the predicted proteome of A. digitifera

 
 
 
Gene sequence KEGG Orthology Encoded protein description
v1.04426; v1.02042
K02528
16S rRNA (adenine1518-N6/1519-N6)-dimethyltransferase
v1.22358; v1.00249
K14191
18S rRNA (adenine1779-N6/1780-N6)-dimethyltransferase
v1.19400; v1.04238
K00561
23S rRNA (adenine2085-N6)-dimethyltransferase
v1.05107; v1.05242
K01488
Adenosine deaminase
v1.04152; v1.09790
K14857
AdoMet-dependent rRNA methyltransferase SPB1
v1.00197
K13530
AraC family transcriptional regulator DNA methyltransferase
v1.12967; v1.19789; v1.07763
K14589
Cap-specific mRNA (nucleoside-2′-O-)-methyltransferase 1
v1.24281
K01489
Cytidine deaminase
v1.16211; v1.14952; v1.01094; v1.06983
K00558
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase
v1.19683; v1.05688; v1.04223
K11324
DNA methyltransferase 1-associated protein 1
v1.14033; v1.19860; v1.19081; v1.04188
K11420
Euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase
v1.02068
K01487
Guanine deaminase
v1.02920
K05931
Histone-arginine methyltransferase CARM1
v1.17589 [+ 7 other sequence copies]
K11446
Histone demethylase JARID1
v1.07640
K06101
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L
v1.13515; v1.18577; v1.20187; v1.19182
K09186
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MLL1
v1.08381
K09187
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MLL2
v1.24258; v1.19182
K09188
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MLL3
v1.07992; v1.10302; v1.13829
K09189
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MLL5
v1.06939; v1.15255; v1.15254
K11424
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD1/2
v1.05552
K11422
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD1
v1.07744
K11423
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD2
v1.03190
K11431
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD7
v1.21867
K11428
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD8
v1.18700 [+ 8 other sequence copies]
K11421
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB
v1.07557; v1.11409
K11419
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H
v1.24733; v1.13497
K11429
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV420H
v1.15405; v1.10291; v1.17601; v1.02845; v1.08629
K11450
Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1
v1.23155; v1.09394; v1.17624; v1.05370
K14835
Ribosomal RNA methyltransferase Nop2
v1.18460 [+ 6 other sequence copies]
K03500
Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase B
v1.07407; v1.03110
K08316
Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase D
v1.12193
K02427
Ribosomal RNA large subunit methyltransferase E
v1.11499
K11392
Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase F
v1.16053; v1.12676
K03437
RNA methyltransferase, TrmH family
v1.12453; v1.05459
K13097
Methylcytosine dioxygenase
v1.07692
K07451
5-Methylcytosine-specific restriction enzyme A
v1.21815; v1.17113
K00565
mRNA (guanine-N7-)-methyltransferase
v1.06363; v1.03360; v1.21218
K05925
mRNA (2′-O-methyladenosine-N6-)-methyltransferase
v1.09661
K07442
tRNA (adenine-N1-)-methyltransferase catalytic subunit
v1.08094; v1.04036; v1.18614
K03256
tRNA (adenine-N(1)-)-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit
v1.11456; v1.00738; v1.04577
K03439
tRNA (guanine-N7-)-methyltransferase
v1.08042
K14864
tRNA methyltransferase
v1.20501
K00557
tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase
v1.15147
K14964
Set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase subunit ASH2
v1.08925 K00571 Site-specific DNA-methyltransferase (adenine-specific)

Direct epigenetic modification of DNA (or mRNA) occurs by methylation of cytosine, and to a lesser extent adenosine and guanine, by nucleobase-specific DNA methyltranferases (Table 18) to give 5-methylcytosine (5-meC), 3-methyladenosine (3-meA) and 3-methylguanine (3-meG) nucleotides, respectively. The principal modification product, 5-methylcytosine behaves much like regular cytosine by pairing with guanine, but in areas of high cytosine methylation, genome transcription is strongly repressed (reviewed in [502]), together with the repression of other chromatin-dependent processes, including the incorporation of transposable elements [503]. Alteration in the methylation status of the entire genome, individual chromosomes or at specific gene sites is essential for normal cellular function, but processes for reprogramming methylated DNA at different stages of cell development, unlike the reversal of histone modifications, is poorly defined [504]. While there are abundant enzymes to repair DNA damage caused by spurious N-alkylation, direct nucleotide C-demethylation (via the hypothetical “DNA demethylase” [505]) is thermodynamically infeasible. Instead, removal of epigenetic C-methylated nucleobases occurs by several base-repair pathways involving DNA excision or mismatch repair enzymes. The genome of A. digitifera encodes expression of a specific DNA glycosylase enzyme [506] for excision of 3-meA, but there are no such enzymes encoded for the excision of 5-meC and 3-meG, although there is encoded a 5-methylcytosine-specific restriction enzyme. Another pathway for DNA demethylation requires base-specific deamination by the AID/Apobec family of deaminase enzymes that, for example, converts 5-meC to thymine that is replaced subsequently by cytosine by C/T mismatch repair enzymes. These methylated nucleobases are recognized for deamination by the cytosine, adenosine and guanine deaminase enzymes [507] that are encoded in the A. digitifera genome, and their deaminated bases are subsequently removed by DNA mismatch repair enzymes. Additionally, the genome of A. digitifera encodes a methlycytosine dioxygenase enzyme that converts 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethycytosine (5-hmC), which is recognized for removal by the base excision repair pathway [508] or via its 5-hmC deaminated intermediate [507]. Combined, these DNA demethylation pathways are able to remodel epigenetic modifications at different stages of cell development.

Most current knowledge on DNA and protein methylation comes from studies of mammals and plants, while our understanding of the extent and roles of DNA methylation in invertebrates, marine invertebrates in particular, is still limited [509]. Little is known about the epigenetic potential of corals to acclimatize and adapt to the thermal and synergistic stressors that cause wide-spread coral “bleaching” [510]. Yet, given that acclimatization occurs via the generation of epiallele variants that can in some instances lead to stable heritable traits of environmental adaptation, there is growing interest in the prospect that epigenetic modifications in corals or their algal symbionts [511] may drive adaptation to defend against the damaging threat imposed by rising temperatures from global climate change. It is anticipated that this field of study will rapidly accelerate with the need to better understand epigenetic processes that may contribute to the persistence of coral reefs.

Conclusions

We offer ZoophyteBase as an unprecedented foundation to interrogate the molecular structure of the predicted A. digitifera proteome. Some key findings include proteins with relevance to host-symbiont function, dysfunction and recovery including those that direct vacuolar trafficking and proteins linking symbiont photosynthesis to coral calcification. An extensive catalogue of mammalian-like proteins essential to neural function and venoms related to distant animal phyla suggests their origins lie deep in early eumetazoan evolution. Homologues of prokaryotic genes that have not been described previously in any eukaryote genome such as flagella proteins, proteins essential for nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis point towards lateral gene transfer, perhaps mediated by viruses, that may lead to “shared” metabolic adaptations of symbiosis, and provide corals with limited ability for gene-encoded adaptation to a changing global environment. It is anticipated that understanding how the genome of a coral hosts interacts with that of its vast array of symbionts, and how it may regulate its metabolic quotient, for example through biochemical or epigenetic modification, will rapidly accelerate our ability to predict the fate of coral reefs.

Availability and requirements

ZoophyteBase was constructed using the Metagenome/Genome Annotated Sequence Natural Language Search Engine (MEGGASENSE). This is a general system for the annotation of sequence collections and presentation of the results in a database that can be searched using biologically intuitive search terms. In this implementation, the predicted proteome of A. digitifera (genome assembly v. 1.0 [48]) was used as the source of protein sequences. The annotation was carried out using the KEGG database (release v58 [51]) to relate A. digitifera protein sequences to KEGG orthologues. The homologous protein sequences were used to construct hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles using the HMMER3 package [49]. The predicted proteome sequences of A. digitifera were searched with the HMM profiles to link proteins to appropriate KEGG orthologues [50,512]. A web interface was developed with various tools. The search platform Lucene/Solr [52] was used to implement natural language searches. Protein sequences provided by the user can be used for BLAST [50] searches against the coral proteome. Selected sequences of the coral proteome can be analysed with third party software (e.g. [53]) to interrogate conserved domains. ZoophyteBase is deployed using Apache-Tomcat (version 7.0.28 for Linux ×64 [513]) on the Ubuntu Linux server of the Section of Bioinformatics at the Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Croatia and is accessible at our published web address [47].

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

WCD and PFL conceived the study, and participated in its design, coordination and drafted the manuscript. AS carried out the annotation. DB, JD, JZ and RG participated in the database design and testing. WCD, MJHvO, AS and PFL performed data analysis. DH and JC participated in and coordinated the annotation, database design and testing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1: Table S16b

Predicted (UniProt) homologues of animal toxins encoded in the genome of A. digitifera.

Click here for file (40.3KB, docx)

Contributor Information

Walter C Dunlap, Email: waltdunlap@gmail.com.

Antonio Starcevic, Email: astar@pbf.hr.

Damir Baranasic, Email: dbaranasic@pbf.hr.

Janko Diminic, Email: jdiminic@pbf.hr.

Jurica Zucko, Email: jzucko@pbf.hr.

Ranko Gacesa, Email: rgacesa@pbf.hr.

Madeleine JH van Oppen, Email: M.vanoppen@aims.gov.au.

Daslav Hranueli, Email: dhranueli@pbf.hr.

John Cullum, Email: cullum@rhrk.uni-kl.de.

Paul F Long, Email: paul.long@kcl.ac.uk.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Professor Noriyuki Satoh and his research team at the Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan for making the protein sequence of A. digitifera publically available without restriction of use. We thank the following scientists from the Australian Institute of Marine Science for helpful discussions, Dr David Bourne, Dr Andrew Negri, Dr Elisha Wood-Charlson and Dr Karen Weynberg. We are also grateful to Dr Bill Leggat of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia for critically reviewing this manuscript. Financial support for this work has come from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom (BBSRC grant BB/H010009/2 to WCD and PFL); from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (WCD and MvO); from a cooperation grant of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and Ministry of Science, Education and Sports, Republic of Croatia (to JC and DH) and from the Croatian Science Foundation (grant 09/5 to DH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Initial work (in progress) was presented at the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, 9-13 July 2012.

References

  1. Freudenthal HD. Symbiodinium gen. nov. and Symbiodinium microadriaticum sp. nov., a zooxanthella: taxonomy, life cycle, and morphology. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1962;9:45–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1962.tb02579.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Muscatine L. In: Coral Reefs: Ecosystems of the World. Dubinsky Z, editor. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals; pp. 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yellowlees D, Rees TAV, Leggat W. Metabolic interactions between algal symbionts and invertebrate hosts. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31:679–694. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01802.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johannes RE, Wiebe WJ, Crossland CJ, Rimmer DW, Smith SV. Latitudinal limits of coral reef growth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1983;11:105–111. [Google Scholar]
  5. Spalding MD, Grenfell AM. New estimates of global and regional coral reef areas. Coral Reefs. 1997;16:225–230. doi: 10.1007/s003380050078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hatcher BG. Coral reef primary productivity. A hierarchy of pattern and process. Trends Ecol Evol. 1990;5:149–155. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90221-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reaka-Kudla ML. In: Biodiversity II. Understanding and Protecting Our Natural Resources. Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO, editor. Washington DC: Joseph Henry/National Academy Press; 1997. The global biodiversity of coral reefs: A comparison with rainforests; pp. 83–108. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davy SK, Allemand D, Weis VM. Cell biology of cnidarians-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:229–261. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05014-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature. 2004;429:827–833. doi: 10.1038/nature02691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoegh-Guldberg O. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Mar Freshwat Res. 1999;50:839–866. doi: 10.1071/MF99078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science. 2007;318:1737–1742. doi: 10.1126/science.1152509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Porter JW, Dustan P, Jaap WC, Patterson KL, Kosmynin V, Meier OW, Patterson ME, Parsons M. Patterns of spread of coral disease in the Florida Keys. Hydrobiologia. 2001;460:1–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1013177617800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruno JF, Selig ER, Casey KS, Page CA, Willis BL, Harvell CD, Sweatman H, Melendy AM. Thermal stress and coral cover as drivers of coral disease outbreaks. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brandt ME, McManus JW. Disease incidence is related to bleaching extent in reef-building corals. Ecology. 2009;90:2859–2867. doi: 10.1890/08-0445.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Devlin MJ, Brodie J. Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behaviour in coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;51:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fabricius KE. Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;50:125–146. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, Gnanadesikan A, Gruber N, Ishida A, Joos F, Key RM, Lindsay K, Maier-Reimer E, Matear R, Monfray P, Mouchet A, Najjar RG, Plattner GK, Rodgers KB, Sabine CL, Sarmiento JL, Schlitzer R, Slater RD, Totterdell IJ, Weirig MF, Yamanaka Y, Yool A. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature. 2005;437:681–686. doi: 10.1038/nature04095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Anthony KRN, Kline DI, Diaz-Pulido G, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17442–17446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804478105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. De’ath G, Fabricius K. Water quality as a regional driver of coral biodiversity and macroalgae on the Great Barrier Reef. Ecol Appl. 2010;20:840–850. doi: 10.1890/08-2023.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Carpenter KE, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson RB, Banks S, Bruckner A, Chiriboga A, Cortés J, Delbeek JC, Devantier L, Edgar GJ, Edwards AJ, Fenner D, Guzmán HM, Hoeksema BW, Hodgson G, Johan O, Licuanan WY, Livingstone SR, Lovell ER, Moore JA, Obura DO, Ochavillo D, Polidoro BA, Precht WF, Quibilan MC, Reboton C, Richards ZT, Rogers AD, Sanciangco J. et al. One third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science. 2008;321:560–563. doi: 10.1126/science.1159196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pendleton LH. Valuing coral reef protection. Ocean Coast Manage. 1995;26:119–131. doi: 10.1016/0964-5691(95)00007-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EM, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science. 2008;319:948–952. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Bellwood DR, Card M, Connolly SR, Folke C, Grosberg R, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jackson JB, Kleypas J, Lough JM, Marshall P, Nyström M, Palumbi SR, Pandolfi JM, Rosen B, Roughgarden J. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science. 2003;301:929–933. doi: 10.1126/science.1085046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans TG, Hofmann GE. Defining the limits of physiological plasticity: how gene expression can assess and predict the consequences of ocean change. Philos Trans R. Soc B-Biol Sci. 2012;367:1733–1745. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weis VM. The susceptibility and resilience of corals to thermal stress: adaptation, acclimatization or both? Mol Ecol. 2010;19:1515–1517. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Edge SE, Morgan MB, Gleason DF, Snell TW. Development of a coral cDNA array to examine gene expression profiles in Montastraea faveolata exposed to environmental stress. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;51:507–523. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grasso LC, Maindonald J, Rudd S, Hayward DC, Saint R, Miller DJ, Ball EE. Microarray analysis identifies candidate genes for key roles in coral development. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:540. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bay LK, Ulstrup KE, Nielsen HB, Jarmer H, Goffard N, Willis BL, Miller DJ, van Oppen MJ. Microarray analysis reveals transcriptional plasticity in the reef building coral Acropora millepora. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:3062–3075. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meyer E, Aglyamova GV, Wang S, Buchanan-Carter J, Abrego D, Colbourne JK, Willis BL, Matz MV. Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:219. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. DeSalvo MK, Sunagawa S, Voolstra CR, Medina M. Transcriptomic responses to heat stress and bleaching in the elkhorn coral Acropora palmata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;402:97–113. [Google Scholar]
  31. Portune KJ, Voolstra CR, Medina M, Szmant AM. Development and heat stress induced transcriptomic changes during embryogenesis of the scleractinian coral Acropora palmata. Mar Genom. 2010;3:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Souter P, Bay LK, Andreakis N, Császár N, Seneca FO, van Oppen MJ. A multilocus, temperature stress-related gene expression profile in Acropora millepora, a dominant reef-building coral. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:328–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02923.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ladner JT, Barshis DJ, Palumbi SR. Protein evolution in two co-occurring types of Symbiodinium: an exploration into the genetic basis of thermal tolerance inSymbiodiniumclade D. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Barshis DJ, Ladner JT, Oliver TA, Seneca FO, Traylor-Knowles N, Palumbi SR. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1387–1392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210224110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Granados-Cifuentes C, Bellantuono AJ, Ridgway T, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Rodriguez-Lanetty M. High natural gene expression variation in the reef-building coralAcropora millepora: potential for acclimative and adaptive plasticity. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Traylor-Knowles N, Granger BR, Lubinski TJ, Parikh JR, Garamszegi S, Xia Y, Marto JA, Kaufman L, Finnerty JR. Production of a reference transcriptome and transcriptomic database (PocilloporaBase) for the cauliflower coral, Pocillopora damicornis. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:585. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun J, Chen Q, Lun JC, Xu J, Qiu JW. PcarnBase: Development of a transcriptomic database for the brain coral Platygyra carnosus. Mar Biotechnol. 2013;15:244–451. doi: 10.1007/s10126-012-9482-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cossins A, Fraser J, Hughes M, Gracey A. Post-genomic approaches to understanding the mechanisms of environmentally induced phenotypic plasticity. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2328–2336. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weston AJ, Dunlap WC, Shick JM, Klueter A, Iglic K, Vukelic A, Starcevic A, Ward M, Wells ML, Trick CG, Long PF. A profile of an endosymbiont-enriched fraction of the coral Stylophora pistillata reveals proteins relevant to microbial-host interactions. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111.015487. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Starcevic A, Dunlap WC, Cullum J, Shick JM, Hranueli D, Long PF. Gene expression in the scleractinian Acropora microphthalma exposed to high solar irradiance reveals elements of photoprotection and coral bleaching. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Miller DJ, Ball EE, Technau U. Cnidarians and ancestral genetic complexity in the animal kingdom. Trends Genet. 2005;21:536–539. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Putnam NH, Srivastava M, Hellsten U, Dirks B, Chapman J, Salamov A, Terry A, Shapiro H, Lindquist E, Kapitonov VV, Jurka J, Genikhovich G, Grigoriev IV, Lucas SM, Steele RE, Finnerty JR, Technau U, Martindale MQ, Rokhsar DS. Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science. 2007;317:86–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1139158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kortschak RD, Samuel G, Saint R, Miller DJ. EST analysis of the cnidarians Acropora millepora reveals extensive gene loss and rapid sequence divergence in the model invertebrates. Curr Biol. 2003;13:2190–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Chapman JA, Kirkness EF, Simakov O, Hampson SE, Mitros T, Weinmaier T, Rattei T, Balasubramanian PG, Borman J, Busam D, Disbennett K, Pfannkoch C, Sumin N, Sutton GG, Viswanathan LD, Walenz B, Goodstein DM, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Prochnik SE, Putnam NH, Shu S, Blumberg B, Dana CE, Gee L, Kibler DF, Law L, Lindgens D, Martinez DE, Peng J, Wigge PA. et al. The dynamic genome of the Hydra. Nature. 2010;464:591–596. doi: 10.1038/nature08830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shinzato C, Shoguchi E, Kawashima T, Hamada M, Hisata K, Tanaka M, Fujie M, Fujiwara M, Koyanagi R, Ikuta T, Fujiyama A, Miller DJ, Satoh N. Using the Acropora digitifera genome to understand coral responses to environmental change. Nature. 2011;476:320–323. doi: 10.1038/nature10249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Coral genome sequence data usage policy. [ http://coralbase.org/accounts/register/]
  47. ZoophyteBase coral proteome database. [ http://bioserv7.bioinfo.pbf.hr/Zoophyte/index.jsp]
  48. Genome Sequencing/Annotation Projects. http://marinegenomics.oist.jp/genomes/download?%20project_id=3]
  49. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server Issue):W29–W37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. KEGG. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. [ http://www.genome.jp/kegg/]
  52. Apache Solr™ [http://lucene.apache.org/solr/]21097779
  53. Conserved Domain Database(CDD) [ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml]
  54. Stanley GD Jr. Photosymbiosis and the evolution of modern coral reefs. Science. 2006;312:857–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1123701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Dubinski Z, Falkowski P. In: Coral Reefs: And Ecosystem in Transition. Dubinski Z, Stambler N, editor. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011. Light as a source of information and energy in zooxanthellate corals; pp. 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dunn SR, Schnitzler CE, Wies VM. Apoptosis and autophagy as mechanisms of dinoflagellate symbiont release during cnidarian bleaching: every which way you lose. Proc Biol Soc. 2007;274:3079–3085. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Downs CA, Kramarsky-Winter E, Martinez J, Kushmaro A, Woodley CM, Loya Y, Ostrander GK. Symbiophagy as a cellular mechanism for coral bleaching. Autophagy. 2009;5:211–216. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.2.7405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Muscatine L, Pool RR. Regulation of numbers of intracellular alage. Proc R Soc B. 1979;204:131–139. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hutagalung AH, Novick PJ. Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:119–149. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00059.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hong M-C, Huang Y-S, Lin W-W, Fang L-S, Chen M-C. ApRab3, a biosynthetic Rab protein, accumulates on the maturing phagosomes and symbiosomes in the tropical sea anemone, Aiptasia pulchella. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;152:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hong M-C, Huang J-S, Song P-C, Lin W-W, Fang L-S, Chen M-C. Cloning and characterization of ApRab4, a recycling Rab protein of Aiptasia pulchella, and its implication in the symbiosome biogenesis. Mar Biotechnol. 2009;11:771–785. doi: 10.1007/s10126-009-9193-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen MC, Cheng YM, Hong MC, Fang LS. Molecular cloning of Rab5 (ApRab5) in Aiptasia pulchella and its retention in phagosomes harbouring live zooxanthellae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:1024–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Chen MC, Cheng YM, Sung PJ, Kuo CE, Fang LS. Molecular identification of Rab7 (ApRab7) in Aiptasia pulchella and its exclusion from phagosomes harboring zooxanthellae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;308:586–595. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01428-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Chen MC, Hong MC, Huang YS, Liu MC, Cheng YM, Fang LS. ApRab11, a cnidarian homologue of the recycling regulatory protein Rab11, is involved in the establishment and maintenance of the Aiptasia-Symbiodinium endosymbiosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;338:1607–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Collins RN. Rab and ARF GTPase regulation of exocytosis. Mol Membr Biol. 2003;20:105–115. doi: 10.1080/0968768031000085892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Deneka M, Neeft M, van der Sluijs P. Regulation of membrane transport by Rab GTPases. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;38:121–142. doi: 10.1080/713609214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vassilieva EV, Nusrat A. Vesicular trafficking: molecular tools and targets. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;440:3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-178-9_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ohya T, Miaczynska M, Coskun Ü, Lommer B, Runge A, Drechsel D, Kalaidzidis Y, Zerial M. Reconstruction of Rab- and SNARE-dependent membrane fusion by synthetic endosomes. Nature. 2009;459:1091–1097. doi: 10.1038/nature08107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. SNARE Database. [ http://bioinformatics.mpibpc.mpg.de/snare/snareQueryPage.jsp]
  70. Kloepper TH, Kienle CN, Fasshauer D. An elaborate classification of SNARE proteins sheds light on the conservation of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:3463–3471. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-03-0193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hay JC, Chao DS, Kuo CS, Scheller RH. Protein interactions regulating vesicle transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus in mammalian cells. Cell. 1997;89:149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Masuda ES, Huang BC, Fisher JM, Luo Y, Scheller RH. Tomosyn binds t-SNARE proteins via a VAMP-like coiled coli. Neuron. 1998;21:479–480. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80559-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Scales SJ, Hesser BA, Masuda ES, Scheller RH. Amisyn, a novel syntaxin-binding protein that may regulate SNARE complex assembly. J Biol Chem. 2002;227:28271–28279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204929200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Jahn R, Scheller RH. SNAREs – Engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:631–643. doi: 10.1038/nrm2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Muscatine L, Pool RR, Cernichiari E. Some factors influencing selective release of soluble organic material by zooxanthellae from reef corals. Mar Biol. 1972;13:298–308. doi: 10.1007/BF00348077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sutton DC, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Host-zooxanthellae interactions in four temperate marine invertebrate symbioses: assessment of the effect of host extracts on symbionts. Biol Bull. 1990;178:175–186. doi: 10.2307/1541975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Masuda K, Miyachi S, Maruyama T. Sensitivity of zooxanthellae and non-symbiotic microalgae to stimulation of photosynthate excretion by giant clam tissue homogenate. Mar Biol. 1994;118:687–693. doi: 10.1007/BF00347517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Narayanan A, Nogueira ML, Ruyechan WT, Kristie TM. Combinatorial transcription of Herpes simplex virus and Varicella zoster virus intermediate early genes is strictly determined by cellular coactivator HCF-1. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1369–1375. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410178200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lee S, Horn V, Julien E, Liu Y, Wysocka J, Bowerman B, Hengartner MO, Herr W. Epigenetic regulation of histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation status by HCF-1 proteins in C. elegans and mammalian cells. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kristie TM, Liang Y, Vogel JL. Control of α-herpesvirus IE gene expression by HCF-1 coupled chromatin modification activities. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2010;1799:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Christensen RG, Enuameh MS, Noyes MB, Brodsky MH, Wolfe SA, Stormo GD. Recognition models to predict DNA-binding specificities of homeodomain proteins. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:i84–i89. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. Hox specificity: unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:66–101. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88003-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Finnerty JR, Martindale MQ. Ancient origins of axial patterning genes: Hox genes and ParaHox genes in the Cnidaria. Evol Dev. 1999;1:16–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.99010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hislop NR, de Jong D, Hayward DC, Ball EE, Miller DJ. Tandem organisation of independently duplicated homeobox genes in the basal cnidarian Acropora millepora. Dev Genes Evol. 2005;215:268–273. doi: 10.1007/s00427-005-0468-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ryan JF, Mazza ME, Pang K, Matus DQ, Baxevanis AD, Martindale MQ, Finnerty JR. Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS One. 2007;2:e153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Larroux C, Fahey B, Degnan SM, Adamski M, Rokhsar DS, Degnan BM. The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of Hox genes. Curr Biol. 2007;17:706–710. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Dowid IB, Chitnis AB. LIM homeobox genes and the CNS: a close relationship. Neuron. 2001;30:301–303. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00307-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Srivastava M, Larroux C, Lu CD, Mohanty K, Chapman J, Degnan BM, Rokhsar DS. Early evolution of the LIM homeobox gene family. BMC Biol. 2010;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ryan JF, Burton PM, Mazza ME, Kwong GK, Mullikin JC, Finnerty JR. The cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor possessed at least 56 homeoboxes: evidence from the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R64. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Saito T, Sawamoto K, Okano H, Anderson DJ, Mikoshiba K. Mammalian BarH homologue is a potential regulator of neural bHLH genes. Dev Biol. 1998;199:216–225. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.8889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Habas S, Kato Y, He X. Wnt/Frazzled activation of Rho regulates vertebrate gastrulation and requires a novel Formin homology protein Daam1. Cell. 2001;107:843–854. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00614-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Matusek T, Djiane A, Jankovics F, Brunner D, Mlodzik M, Mihály J. The Drosophila formin DAAM regulates the tracheal cuticle pattern through organizing the actin cytoskeleton. Development. 2006;133:957–966. doi: 10.1242/dev.02266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Li D, Hallett MA, Zhu W, Rubart M, Liu Y, Yang Z, Chen H, Haneline LS, Chan RJ, Schwartz RJ, Field LJ, Atkinson SJ, Shou W. Dishevelled-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (Daam1) is required for heart morphogenesis. Development. 2011;138:303–315. doi: 10.1242/dev.055566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wada Y, Kitamoto K, Kanbe T, Tanaka K, Anraku Y. The SLP1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for vacuolar morphogenesis and function. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:2214–2223. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Bragdon B, Moseychuk O, Saldanha S, King D, Julian J, Nohe A. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a critical review. Cell Signal. 2011;23:609–620. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Martin VJ. Photoreceptors of cnidarians. Can J Zool. 2002;80:1703–1722. doi: 10.1139/z02-136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mason BM, Cohen JH. Long-wavelength photosensitivity in coral planula larvae. Biol Bull. 2012;222:88–92. doi: 10.1086/BBLv222n2p88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG. Photoreceptors in the cnidarian host allow symbiotic corals to sense blue moonlight. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002;47:309–315. doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Levy O, Appelbaum L, Leggat W, Gothlif Y, Hayward DC, Miller DJ, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Light-responsive cryptochromes from a simple multicellular animal, the coral Acropora millepora. Science. 2007;318:467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.1145432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Vize PD. Transcriptome analysis of the circadian regulatory network in the coral Acropora millepora. Biol Bull. 2009;216:131–137. doi: 10.1086/BBLv216n2p131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Brady AK, Snyder KA, Vize PD. Circadian cycles of gene expression in the coral, Acropora millepora. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Ishiura M, Kutsuna S, Aoki S, Iwasaki H, Andersson CR, Tanabe A, Golden SS, Johnson CH, Kondo T. Expression of a gene cluster kaiABC as a circadian feedback process in cyanobacteria. Science. 1998;281:1519–1523. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5382.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Nishiwaki T, Satomi Y, Nakajima M, Lee C, Kiyohara R, Kageyama H, Kitayama Y, Temamoto M, Yamaguchi A, Hijikata A, Go M, Iwasaki H, Takao T, Kondo T. Role of KaiC phosphorylation in the circadian clock system of Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13927–13932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403906101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Xu Y, Mori T, Qin X, Yan H, Egli M, Johnson CH. Intramolecular regulation of phosphorylation status of the circadian clock protein KaiC. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Nakahira Y, Katayama M, Miyashita H, Katsuna S, Iwasaki H, Oyama T, Kondo T. Global gene repression by KaiC as a master process of prokaryotic circadian system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:881–885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307411100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Kondo T, Ishiura M. The circadian clock of cyanobacteria. Bioessays. 2000;22:10–15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200001)22:1<10::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Hardin PE, Hall JC, Rosbash M. Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature. 1990;343:536–540. doi: 10.1038/343536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Dunlap JC. Molecular bases for circadian clocks. Cell. 1999;96:271–290. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80566-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Reitzel AM, Behrendt L, Tarrant AM. Light entrained rhythmic gene expression in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis: the evolution of the animal circadian clock. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Gibbons IR. Cilia and flagella of eukaryotes. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:107s–124s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.107s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Linck RW. Tektins and microtubules. Adv Mol Cell Biol. 1990;3:35–63. [Google Scholar]
  112. Fox LA, Sawin KE, Sale WS. Kinesin-related proteins in eukaryotic flagella. J Cell Sci. 1994;107:1545–1550. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.6.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Amos LA. The tektin family of microtubule-stabilizing proteins. Genome Biol. 2008;9:229. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kozminski KG, Beech PL, Rosenbaum JL. The Chlamydomonas kinesin-like protein FLA10 is involved in motility associated with the flagellar membrane. J Cell Biol. 1995;131:1517–1527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Bartlett DH, Frantz BB, Matsumura P. Flagellar activators FlbB and FlaI: gene sequences and 5′ consensus sequences of operons under FlbB and FlaI control. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:1575–1581. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.4.1575-1581.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Aldridge P, Karlinsey J, Hughes KT. The type III secretion chaperone FlgN regulates flagellar assembly via a negative feedback loop containing its chaperone substrates FlgK and FlgL. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:1333–1345. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ferris HU, Furukawa Y, Minamino T, Kroetz MB, Kihara M, Namba K, Macnab RM. FlhB regulates ordered export of flagellar components via autocleavage mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:41236–41242. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509438200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Mattick JS. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:289–314. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Starcevic A, Akthar S, Dunlap WC, Shick JM, Hranueli D, Cullum J, Long PF. Enzymes of the shikimate acid pathway encoded in the genome of a basal metazoan, Nematostella vectensis, have microbial origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:2533–2537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707388105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rebbapragada A, Johnson MS, Harding GP, Zuccarelli AJ, Fletcher HM, Zhulin IB, Taylor BL. The Aer protein and the serine chemoreceptor Tsr independently sense intracellular energy levels and transduce oxygen, redox, and energy signals for Escherichia coli behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10541–10546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Troemei ER, Chou JH, Dwyer ND, Colbert HA, Bargmann CI. Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegans. Cell. 1995;83:207–218. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90162-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sen M, Shah A, Marsh L. Two types of alpha-factor receptor determinants for pheromone specificity in the mating-incompatible yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. kluyveri. Curr Genet. 1997;31:235–240. doi: 10.1007/s002940050200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Gestwicki JE, Lamanna AC, Harshey RM, McCarter LL, Kiessling LL, Adler J. Evolutionary conservation of methyl accepting chemotaxis protein location in Bacteria and Archaea. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:6499–6502. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.22.6499-6502.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Capra EJ, Laub MT. Evolution of two-component signal transduction systems. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:325–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Koretke KK, Lupas AN, Warren PV, Rosenberg M, Brown JR. Evolution of two-component signal transduction. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:1956–1970. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. DeVries ME, Kelvin AA, Xu L, Ran L, Robertson J, Kelvin DJ. Defining the origins and evolution of the chemokine/chemokine receptor system. J Immunol. 2006;176:401–415. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.1.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Holland ND. Early central nervous system evolution: an era of skin brains? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:617–627. doi: 10.1038/nrn1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Galliot B, Quiquand M, Ghila L, de Rosa R, Miljkovic-Licina M, Chera S. Origins of neurogenesis, a cnidarian view. Dev Biol. 2009;332:2–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Nakanishi N, Renfer E, Technau U, Rentzsch F. Nervous systems of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis are generated by ectoderm and endoderm and shaped by distinct mechanisms. Development. 2012;139:347–357. doi: 10.1242/dev.071902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Sakarya O, Armstrong KA, Adamska M, Adamski M, Wang IF, Tidor B, Degnan BM, Oakley TH, Kosik KS. A post-synaptic scaffold at the origin of the animal kingdom. PLoS One. 2007;2:e506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Miljkovik-Licina M, Gauchat D, Galliot B. Neuronal evolution: analysis of regulatory genes in a first-evolved nervous system, the hydra nervous system. Biosystems. 2004;76:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Marlow HQ, Srivastava M, Matus DQ, Rokhsar D, Martindale MQ. Anatomy and development of the nervous system of Nematostella vectensis, an anthozoan cnidarian. Dev Neurobiol. 2009;69:235–254. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Kass-Simon G, Pierobon P. Cnidarian chemical neurotransmission, an updated overview. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Intergr Physiol. 2007;146:9–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Grimmelikhuijzen CJP, Westfall JA. In: The Nervous Systems of Invertebrates. An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach. Breidbach O, Kutch W, editor. Basel: Brikhäuser Verlag; 1995. The nervous systems of cnidarians; pp. 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  135. Sleeman MW, Anderson KD, Lambert PD, Yancopoulos GD, Wiegand SJ. The ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptor, CNFRTA alpha. Pharm Acta Helv. 2000;74:265–272. doi: 10.1016/S0031-6865(99)00050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Kass-Simon G, Scappaticci AA Jr. The behavioural and developmental physiology of nematocysts. Can J Zool. 2002;80:1772–1794. doi: 10.1139/z02-135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  137. Plachetzki DC, Fong CR, Oakley TH. Cnidocyte discharge is regulated by light and opsin-mediated phototransduction. BMC Biol. 2012;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Coates MM. Visual ecology and functional morphology of Cubozoa (Cnidaria) Integr Comp Biol. 2003;43:542–548. doi: 10.1093/icb/43.4.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Koyanagi M, Takano K, Tsukamoto H, Ohtsu K, Tokunaga F, Terakita A. Jellyfish vision starts with cAMP signalling mediated by opsin-GS cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15576–15580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806215105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Shichida Y, Matsuyama T. Evolution of opsins and phototransduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:2881–2895. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Beliaev A, Learmonth DA, Soares-da-Silva P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel, peripherally selective chromanyl imidazolethione-based inhibitors of dopamine beta-hydroxylase. J Med Chem. 2006;49:1191–1197. doi: 10.1021/jm051051f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Grimmelikhuijzen CJP, Williamson M, Hansen GN. Neuropeptides in cnidarians. Can J Zool. 2002;80:1690–1702. doi: 10.1139/z02-137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Attenborough RM, Hayward DC, Kitahara MV, Miller DJ, Ball EE. A “neural” enzyme in nonbilaterian animals and algae: preneural origins for peptidylglycine α-amindating monooxygenase. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:3095–3109. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Allemand D, Tambutté E, Zoccola D, Tambutté S. In: Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition. Dubinsky Z, Stambler N, editor. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. Coral calcification, cells to reefs; pp. 119–150. [Google Scholar]
  145. Bénazet-Tambutté S, Allemand D, Joubert J. Permeability of the oral epithelial layers in cnidarians. Mar Biol. 1996;126:43–53. doi: 10.1007/BF00571376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Al-Horani FA, Al-Moghrabi SM, de Beer D. The mechanism of calcification and its relation to photosynthesis and respiration in the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis. Mar Biol. 2003;142:419–429. [Google Scholar]
  147. Zoccola D, Tambutté E, Sénégas-Balas F, Michiels JF, Failla JP, Jaubert J, Allemand D. Cloning of a calcium channel α1 subunit from the reef-building coral, Stylophora pistillata. Gene. 1999;227:157–167. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00602-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zoccola D, Tambutté E, Kulhanek E, Puverel S, Scimeca JC, Allemand D, Tambutté S. Molecular cloning and localisation of a PMCA P-type calcium ATPase from the coral Stylophora pistillata. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1663:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Moya A, Tambutté S, Bertucci A, Tambutté E, Lotto S, Vullo D, Supuran CT, Allemand D, Zoccola D. Carbonic anydrase in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata: characterisation, localisation, and role in biomineralisation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25475–25484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804726200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Gattuso J-P, Allemand D, Frankignoulle M. Photosynthesis and calcification at cellular, organismal and community levels in coral reefs: A review on interactions and control by carbonate chemistry. Amer Zool. 1999;39:160–183. [Google Scholar]
  151. Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagè C, Furla P, Houlbrèque F, Puverel S, Reynaud S, Tambutté É, Tambutté S, Zoccola D. Biomineralisation in reef-building corals: from molecular mechanisms to environmental control. C R Palevol. 2004;3:453–467. doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Venn A, Tambutté E, Holcomb M, Allemand D, Tambutté S. Live tissue imaging shows corals elevate pH under their calcifying tissues relative to seawater. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Kaniewska P, Campbell PR, Kline DI, Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Miller DJ, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Major cellular and physiological impacts of ocean acidification on a reef building coral. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Catterall WA. Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:003947. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Bertucci A, Tembutté S, Supuran CT, Allemand D, Zoccola D. A new coral carbonic anhydrase in Stylophora pistillata. Mar Biotechnol. 2011;13:992–1002. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9363-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Morita M, Iguchi A, Takamura A. Roles of calmodulin and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein in flagellate motility regulation in the coral Acropora digitifera. Mar Biotechnol. 2009;11:118–123. doi: 10.1007/s10126-008-9127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Lane CE, Archibald JM. The eukaryotic tree of life: endosymbionts takes its TOL. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;32:268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Keeling PJ. Functional and ecological impacts of horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Bock R. The give-and-take of DNA: horizontal gene transfer in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Balskus EP, Walsh CT. The genetic and molecular basis for sunscreen biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Science. 2010;329:1653–1656. doi: 10.1126/science.1193637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Waller RF, Stamovits CH, Keeling PJ. Lateral gene transfer of a multigene region from cyanobacteria to dinoflagellates resulting in a novel plastid-targeted fusion protein. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:1437–1443. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Richards TA, Dacks JB, Campbell SA, Blanchard JL, Foster PG, McLeod R, Roberts CW. Evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic shikimate pathway: gene fusions, horizontal transfer, and endosymbiotic replacement. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5:1517–1531. doi: 10.1128/EC.00106-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Habetha M, Bosch TC. Symbiotic Hydra express a plant-like peroxidase gene during oogenesis. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:2157–2165. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Technau U, Miller MA, Bridge D, Steele RE. Arrested apoptosis of nurse cells during Hydra oogenesis and embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 2003;260:191–206. doi: 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Rumpho ME, Worful JM, Lee J, Kannan K, Tyler MS, Bhattacharya D, Moustafa A, Manhart JR. Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17867–17871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804968105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Rumpho ME, Pelletreau KN, Moustafa A, Bhattacharya D. The making of a photosynthetic animal. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:303–311. doi: 10.1242/jeb.046540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Pierce SK, Curtis NE. Cell biology of the chloroplast symbiosis in sacaglossan sea slugs. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2012;293:123–148. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394304-0.00009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Wägele H, Deusch O, Händeler K, Martin R, Schmitt V, Christa G, Pinzger B, Gould SB, Dagan T, Klussmann-Kolb A, Martin W. Transcriptomic evidence that longevity of acquired plastids in the photosynthetic slugs Elysia timida and Plakobranchus ocellatus does not entail lateral transfer of algal nuclear genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:699–706. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Pierce SK, Fang X, Schwartz JA, Jiang X, Zhao W, Curtis NE, Kocot KM, Yang B, Wang J. Transcriptomic evidence for the expression of horizontally transferred algal nuclear genes in the photosynthetic sea slug, Elysia chlorotica. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1545–1556. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Lang BF, O’Kelly C, Nerad T, Gray MW, Burger G. The closest unicellular relatives of animals. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1773–1778. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Ruiz-Trillo I, Roger AJ, Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF. A phylogenomic investigation into the origins of metazoa. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:664–672. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Sun G, Yang Z, Ishwar A, Huang J. Algal genes in the closest relatives of animals. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:2879–2889. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Ohad I, Dal Bosco C, Herrmann RG, Meurer J. Photosysytem II proteins PsbL and PsbJ regulate electron flow to the plastoquinone pool. Biochemistry. 2004;43:2297–2308. doi: 10.1021/bi0348260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yamazaki S, Nomata J, Fujita Y. Differential operation of dual protochlorophyllide reductases for chlorophyll biosynthesis in response to environmental oxygen levels in the cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya boryana. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:911–922. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Pruzinská A, Anders I, Aubry S, Schenk N, Tapernoux-Lüthi E, Müller T, Kräutler B, Hörtensteiner S. In vivo participation of red chlorophyll catabolite reductase in chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Cell. 2007;19:369–387. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Harada J, Saga Y, Yaeda Y, Oh-Oka H, Tamiaki H. In vitro activity of C-20 methyltransferase, BchU, involved in bacteriochlorophyll c biosynthetic pathway in green sulfur bacteria. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:1983–1987. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Long H, King PW, Ghirardi ML, Kim K. Hydrogenase/ferredoxin charge-transfer complexes: effect of hydrogenase mutations on the complex association. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:4060–4067. doi: 10.1021/jp810409z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Spence E, Dunlap WC, Shick JM, Long PF. Redundant pathways of sunscreen biosynthesis in a cyanobacterium. ChemBioChem. 2012;13:531–533. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201100737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wegkamp A, van Oorschot W, de Vos WM, Smid EJ. Characterization of the role of para-aminobenzoic acid biosynthesis in folate production by Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2673–2681. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02174-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Sharon I, Tzahor S, Williamson S, Shmoish M, Man-Aharonovich D, Rusch DB, Yooseph S, Zeidner G, Golden SS, Mackey SR, Adir N, Weingart U, Horn D, Venter JC, Mandel-Gutfreund YM, Béjà O. Viral photosynthetic reaction center genes and transcripts in the marine environment. ISME J. 2007;1:492–501. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang Q, Jantaro S, Lu B, Majeed W, Bailey M, He Q. The high light-inducible polypeptides stabilize trimeric photosystem I complex under high light conditions in Synechocystis PCC 6803. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1239–1250. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.121087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Mann NH, Cook A, Millard A, Bailey S, Clokie M. Marine ecosystems: bacterial photosynthesis genes in a virus. Nature. 2003;424:741. doi: 10.1038/424741a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Lindell D, Sullivan MB, Johnson ZI, Tolonen AC, Rohwer F, Chisholm SW. Transfer of photosynthesis genes to and from Prochlorococcus viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11013–11018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401526101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Mann NH, Clokie MRJ, Millard A, Cook A, Wilson WH, Wheatley PJ, Letarov A, Krisch HM. The genome of S-PM2, a “photosynthetic” T4-type bacteriophage that infects marine Synechococcus strains. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:3188–3200. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.9.3188-3200.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. van Oppen MJH, Leong J-A, Gates RD. Coral-virus interactions: a double-edged sword? Symbiosis. 2009;47:1–8. doi: 10.1007/BF03179964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  186. Nagasaki K, Tomaru Y, Shirai Y, Takano Y, Mizumoto H. Dinoflagellate-infecting viruses. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2006;86:469–474. doi: 10.1017/S0025315406013361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Lohr J, Munn CB, Wilson WH. Characterization of a latent virus-like infection of symbiotic zooxanthellae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2976–2981. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02449-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Moran NA. Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(Suppl 1):8627–8633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611659104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Falkowski PG, Dubinsky Z, Muscatine L, Porter JW. Light and the bioenergentics of a symbiotic coral. Bioscience. 1984;34:705–709. doi: 10.2307/1309663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  190. Muscatine L, D’Elia CF. The uptake, retention and release of ammonium by reef corals. Limnol Oceanogr. 1978;23:725–734. doi: 10.4319/lo.1978.23.4.0725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  191. Rahav O, Dubinsky Z, Achituv Y, Falkowski PG. Ammonium metabolism in the zooxanthellate coral, Stylophora pistillata. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1989;236:325–337. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  192. Kawaguti S. Ammonium metabolism of the reef corals. Biol J Okayama Univ. 1953;1:171–176. [Google Scholar]
  193. Kühl M, Cohen Y, Dalsgaard T, Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. Microenvironment and photosynthesis of zooxanthellae in scleractinian corals studied with microsensors for O2, pH and light. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995;117:159–172. [Google Scholar]
  194. Gallon JR. The oxygen sensitivity of nitrogenase: a problem for biochemists and micro-organisms. Trends Biochem Sci. 1981;6:19–23. [Google Scholar]
  195. Webb KL, DuPaul WD, Wiebe W, Sottile W, Johannes RE. Enewetak (Eniwetok) atoll: aspects of the nitrogen cycle on a coral reef. Limnol Oceanogr. 1975;20:198–210. doi: 10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  196. Crossland CJ, Barnes DJ. Dissolved nutrients and organic particulates in water flowing over coral reefs at Lizard Island. Aust J Mar Freshwat Res. 1983;34:835–844. doi: 10.1071/MF9830835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  197. Wilkinson CR, Williams DMB, Sommarco PW, Hogg RW, Trott LA. Rates of nitrogen fixation on coral reefs across the continental shelf of the central Great Barrier Reef. Reef Mar Biol. 1984;80:255–262. doi: 10.1007/BF00392820. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  198. Capone DG, Dunham SE, Horrigan SG, Duguay LE. Microbial nitrogen transformations in unconsolidated coral reef sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992;80:75–88. [Google Scholar]
  199. Hewson I, Moisander PH, Morrison AE, Zehr JP. Diazotrophic bacterioplankton in a coral reef lagoon: phylogeny, diel nitrogenase expression and response to phosphate enrichment. ISME J. 2007;1:78–91. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Larkum AWD, Kennedy IR, Muller WJ. Nitrogen fixation on a coral reef. Mar Biol. 1988;98:143–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00392669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  201. Shashar N, Cohen Y, Loya Y, Sar N. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in stony corals: evidence for coral-bacteria interactions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1994;111:259–264. [Google Scholar]
  202. Lesser MP, Mazel CH, Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG. Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in corals. Science. 2004;305:997–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.1099128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Mouchka ME, Hewson I, Harvell CD. Coral-associated bacterial assemblages: current knowledge and the potential for climate-driven impacts. Integr Comp Biol. 2010;50:662–674. doi: 10.1093/icb/icq061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Olson ND, Ainsworth TD, Gates RD, Takabayashi M. Diazotrophic bacteria associated with Hawaiian Montipora coral: diversity and abundance in correlation with symbiotic dinoflagellates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2009;371:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  205. Lema KA, Willis BL, Bourne DG. Corals form characteristic associations with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:3136–3144. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07800-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Kellogg CA. Tropical Archaea: diversity associated with the surface microlayer of corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;273:81–88. [Google Scholar]
  207. Wegley L, Edwards R, Rodriguez-Brito B, Liu H, Rohwer F. Metagenomic analysis of the microbial community associated with the coral Porites astreoides. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2707–2719. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01383.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Siboni N, Ben-Dov E, Silvan A, Kushmaro A. Global distribution and diversity of coral-associated Archaea and their possible role in the coral holobiont nitrogen cycle. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2979–2990. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Rubio LM, Ludden PW. Biosynthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:93–111. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Fujita Y, Bauer CE. Reconstitutuion of the light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase from purified Bchl and BchN-BchB subunits. In vitro confirmation of nitrogenase features of a bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:23583–23588. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002904200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Sarma R, Barney BM, Hamilton TL, Jones A, Seefeld LC, Peters JW. Crystal structure of the L protein of Rhodobacter sphaeroides light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase with MgADP bound: a homologue of the nitrogenase Fe protein. Biochemistry. 2008;47:13004–13015. doi: 10.1021/bi801058r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Muraki N, Nomata J, Ebata K, Mizoguchi T, Shiba T, Tamiaki H, Kurisu G, Fujita Y. X-ray crystal structure of the light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase. Nature. 2010;465:110–114. doi: 10.1038/nature08950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Heyes DJ, Hunter CN. Making light work of enzyme catalysis: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30:642–649. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Dean DR, Bolin JT, Zheng L. Nitrogenase metalloclusters: structure, organisation, and synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:6737–6744. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.6737-6744.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Zheng L, Dean DR. Catalytic formation of a nitrogenase iron-sulfur cluster. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:18723–18726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Shah VK, Stacey G, Brill WJ. Electron transport to nitrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:12064–12068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Hoover TR, Santero E, Porter S, Kustu S. The integration host factor stimulates interaction of RNA polymerase with FIFA, the transcriptional activator for nitrogen fixation operons. Cell. 1990;63:11–22. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90284-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Merrick MJ, Edwards RA. Nitrogen control in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1995;59:604–622. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.4.604-622.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Kneip C, Lockhart P, Voss C, Maier UG. Nitrogen fixation in eukaryotes – new models for symbiosis. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Beman JM, Roberts KJ, Wegley L, Rohwer F, Francis CA. Distribution and diversity of archaeal ammonia momooxygenase genes associated with corals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5642–5647. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00461-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Campbell WH. Nitrate reductase structure, function and regulation: Bridging the gap between biochemistry and physiology. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol. 1999;50:277–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Einsle O. Structure and function of formate-dependent cytochrome c nitrite reductase, NrfA. Methods Enzymol. 2011;496:399–422. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386489-5.00016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Holden HM, Thoden JB, Raushel FM. Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase: an amazing biochemical odyssey from substrate to product. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;56:507–522. doi: 10.1007/s000180050448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Crandall JB, Teece MA. Urea is a dynamic pool of bioavailable nitrogen in coral reefs. Coral Reefs. 2012;31:207–214. doi: 10.1007/s00338-011-0836-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  225. Catmull J, Yellowlees D, Miller DJ. NADP+-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase from Acropora formosa: purification and properties. Mar Biol. 1987;95:559–563. doi: 10.1007/BF00393099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  226. Clode PL, Saunders M, Maker G, Ludwig M, Atkins CA. Uric acid deposits in symbiotic marine algae. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32:170–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Lancaster JR Jr. Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:8137–8141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Trapido-Rosenthal H, Zielke S, Owen R, Buxon L, Boeing B, Bhagooli R, Archer J. Increased zooxanthellae nitric oxide synthase activity is associated with coral bleaching. Biol Bull. 2005;208:3–6. doi: 10.2307/3593094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Bouchard JN, Yamasaki H. Heat stress stimulates nitric oxide production in Symbiodinium microadriaticum: a possible linkage between nitric oxide and the coral bleaching phenomenon. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:641–652. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Perez S, Weis V. Nitric oxide and cnidarians bleaching: an eviction notice mediates breakdown of a symbiosis. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2804–2810. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Safavi-Hemami H, Young ND, Doyle J, Llewellyn L, Klueter A. Characterisation of nitric oxide synthase in three cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbioses. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Dreyer J, Schleicher M, Tappe A, Schilling K, Kuner T, Kusumawidijaja G, Müller-Esterl W, Oess S, Kuner R. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-interacting protein interacts with neuronal NOS and regulates its distribution and activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10454–10465. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2265-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Siebeck O. Photoactivation and depth-dependent UV tolerance in reef coral in the Great Barrier Reef/Australia. Naturwissenschaften. 1981;68:426–428. doi: 10.1007/BF01079713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  234. Reef R, Dunn S, Levy O, Dove S, Shemesh E, Brickner I, Leggat W, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Photoreactivation is the main repair pathway for UV-induced DNA damage in coral plenulae. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:2760–2766. doi: 10.1242/jeb.031286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Anderson S, Zepp R, Machula J, Santavy D, Hansen L, Mueller E. Indicators of UV exposure in corals and their relevance to global climate change and coral bleaching. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2001;7:1271–1782. doi: 10.1080/20018091094998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  236. Torregiani JH, Lesser MP. The effects of short-term exposures to ultraviolet radiation in the Hawaiian coral Montipora verrucosa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2007;340:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  237. Baruch R, Avishai N, Rabinowitz C. UV incites diverse levels of DNA breaks in different cellular compartments of a branching coral species. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:843–848. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Hudson CL, Ferrier MD. Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium. Florida; 2008. Assessing ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in field-collected Aiptasia pallida using the comet assay; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  239. Nesa B, Baird AH, Harii S, Yakovleva I, Hidaka M. Algal symbionts increase DNA damage in coral plenulae exposed to sunlight. Zool Stud. 2012;51:112–117. [Google Scholar]
  240. Vijayavel K, Downs CA, Ostrander GK, Richmond RH. Oxidative DNA damage induced by iron chloride in the larvae of the lace coral Pocillopora damicornis. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012;155:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2011.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Lesser MP, Farrell JH. Exposure to solar radiation increases damage to both host tissues and algal symbionts of corals during thermal stress. Coral Reefs. 2004;23:367–377. doi: 10.1007/s00338-004-0392-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  242. Polato NR, Vera JC, Baums IB. Gene discovery in the threatened elkhorn coral: 454 sequencing of the Acropora palmata transcriptome. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Lindquist S, Craig EA. The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:631–677. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Åkerfelt M, Morimoto RI, Sistonen L. Heat shock factors: Integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:545–555. doi: 10.1038/nrm2938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Bosch TCG Praetzel G The heat shock response in hydra: immunological relationship of hsp60, the major heat shock protein of Hydra vulgaris, to the ubiquitous hsp70 family Hydrobiologia 1991216–217513–517.11538047 [Google Scholar]
  246. Choresh O, Ron E, Loya Y. The 60-kDa hear shock protein (HSP60) of the sea anemone Anemonia virdis; a potential early warning system for environmental change. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2001;3:501–508. doi: 10.1007/s10126-001-0007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Bromage E, Carpenter L, Kaattari S, Patterson M. Quantification of coral heat shock proteins from individual coral polyps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009;376:123–132. [Google Scholar]
  248. Chow AR, Ferrier-Pagès C, Khalouei S, Reynaud S, Brown IR. Increased light intensity induces heat shock protein Hsp60 in coral species. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2009;14:469–476. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0100-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Venn AA, Quinn J, Jones R, Bodnar A. P-glycoprotein (multi-xenobiotic resistance) and heat shock protein gene expression in the coral Montastraea franksi in response to environmental toxicant. Aquat Toxicol. 2009;93:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Nakamura M, Morita M, Kurihara H, Mitarai S. Expression of hsp70, hsp90 and hsf1 in the reef coral Acropora digitifera under prospective acidified conditions over the next several decades. Biol Open. 2012;1:75–81. doi: 10.1242/bio.2011036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Hayes RL, King CM. Induction of 70-kD heat shock protein in scleractinian corals by elevated temperature: significance for coral bleaching. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1995;4:36–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Fang L-S, Huang S-P, Lin K-L. High temperature induces the synthesis of heat-shock proteins and the elevation on intracellular calcium in the coral Acropora grandis. Coral Reefs. 1997;16:127–131. doi: 10.1007/s003380050066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  253. Carpenter LW, Patterson MR, Bromage ES. Water flow influences the spatiotemporal distribution of heat shock protein 70 within colonies of the scleractinian coral Montastrea annularis (Ellis and Solander, 1786) following heat stress: Implications for coral bleaching. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2010;387:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.02.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  254. Rosic NN, Pernice M, Dove S, Dunn S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Gene expression profiles of cytosolic heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp90 from symbiotic dinoflagellates in response to thermal stress: possible implications for coral bleaching. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2011;16:69–80. doi: 10.1007/s12192-010-0222-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Roth MS, Goericke R, Deheyn DD. Cold induces acute stress but heat is ultimately more deleterious for the reef-building coral Acropora yongei. Sci Rep. 2012;2:240. doi: 10.1038/srep00240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Aravind L, Anantharaman V, Koonin EV. Monophyly of class I aminoacyl tRNA synthase, USPA, ETFP, photolyase and the PP-ATPase nucleotide-binding domains: Implications for protein evolution in the RNA world. Proteins. 2002;48:1–14. doi: 10.1002/prot.10064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Kültz D. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:225–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.103635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Kvint K, Nachin L, Diez A, Nyström T. The bacterial universal stress protein: functions and regulation. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:140–145. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Kerk D, Bulgrien J, Smith DW, Gribskov M. Arabidopsis proteins containing similarity to the universal stress protein domain of bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1209–1219. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.016006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Forêt S, Seneca F, de Jong D, Bieller A, Hemmrich G, Augustin R, Hayward DC, Ball EE, Bosch TC, Agata K, Hassel M, Miller DJ. Phylogenomics reveals an anomalous distribution of USP genes in metazoans. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:153–161. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. DeSalvo MK, Voolstra CR, Sunagawa S, Schwartz JA, Stillman JH, Coffroth MA, Szmant AM, Medina M. Differential gene expression during thermal stress and bleaching in the Caribbean coral Montastraea faveolata. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:3952–3971. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Voolstra CR, Schnetzer J, Penshkin L, Randall CJ, Szmant AM, Medina M. Effects of temperature on gene expression in embryos of the coral Montastraea faveolata. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:627. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Sone H, Akanuma H, Fukuda T. Oxygenomics in environmental stress. Redox Rep. 2010;15:98–114. doi: 10.1179/174329210X12650506623843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Pronk TE, Van Someren EP, Stierum RH, Ezendam J, Pennings JLA. Unraveling toxicological mechanisms and predicting toxicity classes with gene dysregulation networks. J Appl Toxicol. 2012. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
  265. Hernández MP, Sullivan WP, Toft DO. The assembly and intermolecular properties of the hsp70-Hop-hsp90 molecular complex. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:38294–38304. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206566200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Song Y, Masison DC. Independent regulation of Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones by Hsp70/Hsp90-organising protein Sti (Hop1) J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34178–34185. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505420200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Ellis RJ, van der Vies SM. Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:321–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Takayama S, Reed JC, Homma S. Heat-shock proteins as regulators of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003;2003(22):9041–9047. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Qiu XB, Shao YM, Miao S, Wang L. The diversity of the DnaJ/Hsp40 family, the crucial partners for Hsp70 chaperones. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:2560–2570. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6192-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Ke Q, Costa M. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) Mol Pharmacol. 2006;70:1469–1480. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.027029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Rankin EB, Biju MP, Liu Q, Unger TL, Rha J, Johnson RS, Simon MC, Keith B, Haase VH. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2) regulates erythropoietin in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1068–1077. doi: 10.1172/JCI30117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Levy O, Kaniewska P, Alon S, Eisenberg E, Karako-Lampert S, Bay LK, Reef R, Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Miller DJ, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Complex diel cycles of gene expression in coral-algal symbiosis. Science. 2011;331:175. doi: 10.1126/science.1196419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:373–428. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Parsell DA, Lindquist S. The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:437–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.002253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Imai J, Yashiroda H, Maruya M, Yahara I, Tanaka K. Proteasomes and molecular chaperones: cellular machinery responsible for folding and destruction of unfolded proteins. Cell Cycle. 2003;2:585–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Rosenzweig R, Glickman MH. Forging a proteasome α-ring with dedicated proteasome chaperones. Nat Sruct Mol Biol. 2008;15:218–220. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0308-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Murata S, Yashiroda H, Tanaka K. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:104–115. doi: 10.1038/nrm2630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Bügl H, Fauman EB, Staker BL, Zheng F, Kushner SR, Saper MA, Bardwell JC, Jakob U. RNA methylation under heat shock control. Mol Cell. 2000;6:349–360. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Caldas T, Binet E, Bouloc P, Costa A, Desgres J, Richarme G. The FtsJ/RrmJ heat shock protein of Escherichia coli is a 23S ribosomal RNA methyl transferase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16414–16419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001854200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Shimuta T, Nakano K, Yamaguchi Y, Ozaki S, Fujimitsu K, Matsunaga C, Noguchi K, Emoto A, Katayama T. Novel heat shock protein HspQ stimulates degradation of mutant DnaA protein in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells. 2004;9:1151–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2004.00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Kitagawa M, Wada C, Yoshioka S, Yura T. Expression of ClpB, an analog of the ATP-dependent protease regulatory subunit in Escherichia coli, is controlled by a heat shock sigma factor (sigma 32) J Bacteriol. 1991;173:4247–4253. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.14.4247-4253.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Squires C, Squires CL. The Clp proteins: proteolysis or molecular chaperones? J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1081–1085. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.4.1081-1085.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Lupas AN, Koretke KK. Bioinformatic anatysis of ClpS, a protein module involved in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein degradation. J Struct Biol. 2003;141:77–83. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00582-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Maillard RA, Chistol G, Sen M, Righini M, Tan J, Kaiser CM, Hodges C, Martin A, Bustamante C. ClpX(P) generates mechanical force to unfold and translocate its protein substrates. Cell. 2011;145:459–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Horwitz J. Alpha-crystallin can function as a molecular chaperone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10449–10453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Rao PV, Horwitz J, Zigler JS. α-Crystallin, a molecular chaperone, forms a stable complex with carbonic anhydrase upon heat denaturation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;190:786–793. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Carricart-Ganivet JP, Cabanillas-Terán N, Cruz-Ortega I, Blanchon P. Sensitivity of calcification to thermal stress varies among genera of massive reef-building corals. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Taylor JL, Wieczorek A, Keyser AR, Grover A, Flinkstrom R, Karls RK, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Dobos KM, Izzo AA. HspX-mediated protection against tuberculosis depends on the chaperoning of a mycobacterial molecule. Immunol Cell Biol. 2012;90:945–954. doi: 10.1038/icb.2012.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Santo Ede O, Alves N Jr, Dias GM, Mazotto AM, Vermelho A, Vora GJ, Wilson B, Beltran VH, Bourne DG, Le Roux F, Thompson FL. Genomic and proteomic analysis of the pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus reveals a diverse virulence repertoire. ISME J. 2011;5:1471–1483. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Kimes NE, Grim CJ, Johnson WR, Hasan NA, Tall BD, Kothary MH, Kiss H, Munk AC, Tapia R, Green L, Detter C, Bruce DC, Brettin TS, Colwell RR, Morris PJ. Temperature regulation of virulence factors in the pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. ISME J. 2012;6:835–846. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Zhang T, Kraus WL. SIRT1-dependent regulation of chromatin and transcription: linking NAD+ metabolism and signaling to the control of cellular functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1804;2010:1666–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Liu TF, Yoza BK, El Gazzar M, Vachharajani VT, McCall CE. NAD+-dependent SIRT1 deacetylase participates in epigenetic reprogramming during endotoxin tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:9856–9864. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.196790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Katada S, Imhof A, Sassone-Corsi P. Connecting threads: epigenetics and metabolism. Cell. 2012;148:24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Lim JH, Lee YM, Chun YS, Chen J, Kim JE, Park JW. Sirtuin 1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating hypoxia-inducible Factor 1α. Mol Cell. 2010;38:864–878. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Lee JH, Song MY, Song EK, Kim EK, Moon WS, Han MK, Park JW, Kwon KB, Park BH. Overexpression of SIRT1 protects pancreatic beta-cells against cytokine toxicity by suppressing the nuclear factor-kappaB signalling pathway. Diabetes. 2009;58:344–351. doi: 10.2337/db07-1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Wang F, Nguyen M, Qin FX, Tong Q. SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction. Aging Cell. 2007;6:505–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Shi T, Wang F, Stieren E, Tong Q. SIRT3, a mitochondrial sirtuin deacetylase, regulates mitochondrial function and thermogenesis in brown adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13560–13567. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414670200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Nasrin N, Wu X, Fortier E, Feng Y, Baré OC, Chen S, Ren X, Wu Z, Streeper RS, Bordone L. SIRT4 regulates fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial gene expression in liver and muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:31995–32002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.124164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Du J, Zhou Y, Su X, Yu JJ, Khan S, Jiang H, Kim J, Woo J, Kim JH, Choi BH, He B, Chen W, Zhang S, Cerione RA, Auwerx J, Hao Q, Lin H. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334:806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1207861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Mostoslavsky R, Chua KF, Lombard DB, Pang WW, Fisher MR, Gellon L, Liu P, Mostoslavsky G, Franco S, Murphy MM, Mills KD, Patel P, Hsu JT, Hong AL, Ford E, Cheng HL, Kennedy C, Nunez N, Bronson R, Frendewey D, Auerbach W, Valenzuela D, Karow M, Hottiger MO, Hursting S, Barrett JC, Guarente L, Mulligan R, Demple B, Yancopoulos GD. et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell. 2006;124:315–329. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Imai S, Chen D, Su F, Shiloh A, Guarente L, Gu W. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell. 2001;107:137–148. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Vakhrusheva O, Smolka C, Gajawada P, Kostin S, Boettger T, Kubin T, Braun T, Bober E. Sirt7 increases stress resistance of cardiomyocytes and prevent apoptosis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy in mice. Circ Res. 2008;102:703–710. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. O’Halloran TV, Culotta VC. Metallochaperones, an intracellular shuttle service for metal ions. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25057–25060. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R000006200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Lin SJ, Culotta VC. The ATX1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a small metal homeostasis factor that protects cells against reactive oxygen toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3784–3788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Culotta VC, Klomp LWJ, Strain J, Casareno RLB, Krems B, Gitlin JD. The copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:23469–23472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.38.23469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Wong PC, Waggoner D, Subramaniam JR, Tessarollo L, Bartnikas TB, Culotta VC, Price DL, Rothstein J, Gitlin JD. Copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase is essential to activate mammalian Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2886–2891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040461197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Shick JM, Lesser MP, Dunlap WC, Stochaj WR, Chalker BE, Wu Won J. Depth-dependent responses to solar ultraviolet radiation and oxidative stress in the zooxanthellate coral Acropora microphthalma. Mar Biol. 1995;122:41–51. doi: 10.1007/BF00349276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  308. Lesser MP, Stochaj WR, Tapley DW, Shick JM. Bleaching in coral-reef anthozoans: effects of irradiance, ultraviolet radiation, and temperature on the activities of protective enzymes against active oxygen. Coral Reefs. 1990;8:225–232. doi: 10.1007/BF00265015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  309. Crowe JH, Carpenter JF, Crowe LM. The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:73–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Sola-Penna M, Meyer-Fernandes JR. Stabilization against thermal inactivation promoted by sugars on enzyme structure and function: Why is trehalose more effective than other sugars? Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;360:10–14. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Veron JEN. Corals of Australia and the Indo-Pacific. Singapore: University of Hawaii Press; 1993. p. 644. [Google Scholar]
  312. Shick JM. In: Frontiers of Photobiology. Shima A, Ichihashi M, Fujiwara Y, Takebe H, editor. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1993. Solar UV and oxidative stress in algal-animal symbioses; pp. 561–564. [Google Scholar]
  313. Turrens JF. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J Physiol. 2003;552:335–344. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Lesser MP. Oxidative stress causes coral bleaching during exposure to elevated temperatures. Coral Reefs. 1997;16:187–192. doi: 10.1007/s003380050073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  315. Brown BE, Downs CA, Dunn RP, Gibb SW. Exploring the basis of thermotolerance in the reef coral Goniastrea aspera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;242:119–120. [Google Scholar]
  316. Halliwell B. Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:312–322. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.077073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Liñán-Cabello MA, Lesser MP, Flores-Ramírez LA, Zenteno-Savín T, Reyes-Bonilla H. In: Oxidative Stress in Aquatic Ecosystems. Abele D, Vázquez-Medina JP, Zenteno-Savín T, editor. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. Oxidative stress in coral-photobiont communities; pp. 127–138. [Google Scholar]
  318. Jönsson TJ, Lowther WT. The peroxiredoxin repair proteins. Subcell Biochem. 2007;44:115–141. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6051-9_6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Cheng Z, Zhang J, Ballou DP, Williams CH Jr. Reactivity of thioredoxin as a protein thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase. Chem Rev. 2011;111:5768–5783. doi: 10.1021/cr100006x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Arnér ESJ, Holmgren A. Physiological function of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:6102–6109. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Ainsworth TD, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Cellular processes of bleaching in the Mediterranean coral Oculina patagonica. Coral Reefs. 2008;27:593–597. doi: 10.1007/s00338-008-0355-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Kenkel CD, Aglyamova G, Alamaru A, Bhagooli R, Capper R, Cunning R, De Villers A, Haslun JA, Hédouin L, Keshavmurthy S, Kuehl KA, Mahmoud H, McGinty ES, Montoya-Maya PH, Palmer CV, Pantile R, Sánchez JA, Schils T, Silverstein RN, Squiers LB, Tang PC, Goulet TL, Matz MV. Development of gene expression markers of acute heat-light stress in reef-building corals of the genus Porites. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. Wang C, Youle RJ. The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:95–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. Richier S, Sabourault C, Courtiade J, Zucchini N, Allemand Furla P. Oxidative stress and apoptotic events during thermal stress in the sea anemone, Anemone viridis. FEBS J. 2006;273:4186–4198. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Lasi M, Pauly B, Schmidt N, Cikala M, Stiening B, Käsbauer T, Zenner G, Popp T, Wagner A, Knapp RT, Huber AH, Grunert M, Söding J, David CN, Böttger A. The molecular cell death machinery in the simple cnidarian Hydra includes an expanded caspase family and pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Cell Res. 2010;20:812–825. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Baker AC, Starger CJ, McClanahan TR, Glynn PW. Coral reefs: corals’ adaptive response to climate change. Nature. 2004;430:741. doi: 10.1038/430741a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. McClanahan T. The relationship between bleaching and mortality of common corals. Mar Biol. 2004;144:1239–1245. doi: 10.1007/s00227-003-1271-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  328. Ainsworth TD, Wasmund K, Ukani L, Seneca F, Yellowlees D, Miller D, Leggat W. Defining the tipping point. A complex cellular life/death balance in corals in response to stress. Sci Rep. 2011;1:160. doi: 10.1038/srep00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  329. Tchernov D, Kvitt H, Haramaty L, Bibby TS, Gorbunov MY, Rosenfeld H, Falkowski PG. Apoptosis and the selective survival of host animals following thermal bleaching in zooxanthellate corals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9905–9909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106924108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  330. Pernice M, Dunn SR, Miard T, Dufour S, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Regulation of apoptotic mediators reveals dynamic responses to thermal stress in the reef building coral Acropora millepora. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. David CN, Schmidt N, Schade M, Pauly B, Alexabdrova O, Böttger A. Hydra and the evolution of apoptosis. Integr Comp Biol. 2005;45:631–638. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.4.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Zmasek CM, Zhang Q, Ye Y, Godzik A. Surprising complexity of the ancestral apoptosis network. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R226. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Siepp S, Wittig K, Stiening B, Böttger A, Leitz T. Morphogenesis in Hydractina echinata (Cnidaria) is capase-dependent. Int J Dev Biol. 2006;50:63–70. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.052012ss. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Dunn SR, Weis VM. Apoptosis as a post-phagocytic mechanism in a coral-dinoflagellate mutualism. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:268–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Adrian C, Brumatti G, Martin SJ. Apoptosomes: protease activation platforms to die for. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31:243–247. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  336. Yang X, Khosravi-Far R, Chang HY, Baltimore D. Daxx, a novel Fas-binding protein that activates JNK and apoptosis. Cell. 1997;89:1067–1076. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80294-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Cohen O, Inbal B, Kissil JL, Raveh T, Berissi H, Spivak-Kroizaman T, Feinstein E, Kimchi A. DAP-kinase participates in TNF-α- and Fas-induced apoptosis and its function requires the death domain. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:141–148. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Lee JH, Rho SB, Chun T. Programmed cell death 6 (PDCD6) protein interacts with death associated protein kinase 1 (DAPk1): additive effect on apoptosis via caspase-3 dependent pathway. Biotechnol Lett. 2005;27:1011–1015. doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-7869-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Kaiser WJ, Upton JW, Long AB, Livingstone-Rosanoff D, Daley-Bauer LP, Hakem R, Caspary T, Mocarski ES. RIP3 mediates the embryonic lethality of caspase-8 deficient mice. Nature. 2011;471:368–372. doi: 10.1038/nature09857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Krumschnabel G, Sohm B, Bock F, Manzl C, Villunger A. The enigma of caspase-2: the layman’s view. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:195–207. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Khorchid A, Ikura M. How calpain is activated by calcium. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9:239–341. doi: 10.1038/nsb0402-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  342. Janssens S, Timel A, Lippens T, Tschopp J. PIDD mediates NF-κB activation response to DNA damage. Cell. 2005;123:1079–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  343. Wolenski FS, Garbati MR, Lubinski TL, Traylor-Knowles N, Dresselhaus E, Stefanik DJ, Goucher H, Finnerty JR, Gilmore TD. Characterisation of the core elements of the NF-κB signalling pathway of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:1076–1087. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00927-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  344. Dunn SR, Phillips WS, Spatafora JW, Green DR, Wies VM. Highly conserved caspase and Bcl-2 homologues from the sea anemone Aptaisia pallida: lower metazoans for the study of apoptosis evolution. J Mol Evol. 2006;63:95–107. doi: 10.1007/s00239-005-0236-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Knowlton N, Rohwer F. Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat. Am Nat. 2003;162(Suppl):S51–S62. doi: 10.1086/378684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Littman RA, Willis BL, Pfeffer C, Bourne DG. Diversities of coral-associated bacteria differ with location, but not species, for three acroporid corals on the Great Barrier Reef. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;68:152–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  347. Rohwer F, Seguritan V, Azam F, Knowlton N. Diversity and distribution of coral-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;243:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  348. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the unexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12115–12120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605127103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  349. Sunagawa S, DeSalvo MK, Voolstra CR, Reyes-Bermudez A, Medina M. Identification and gene expression analysis of a taxonomically restricted cysteine-rich protein family in reef-building corals. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  350. Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease, and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:355–362. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  351. Wild C, Huettel M, Klueter A, Kremb SG, Rasheed MY, Jørgensen BB. Coral mucus formation functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the reef ecosystem. Nature. 2004;428:66–70. doi: 10.1038/nature02344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  352. Garren M, Azam F. Corals shed bacteria as a potential mechanism of resilience to organic matter enrichment. ISME J. 2012;6:1159–1165. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Bourne DG, Garren M, Work TM, Rosenberg E, Smith GW, Harvell CD. Microbial disease and the coral holobiont. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:554–562. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Reshef L, Koren O, Loya Y, Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. The coral probiotic hypothesis. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:2068–2073. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Vollmer SV, Kline DI. Natural disease resistance in threatened staghorn corals. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  356. Carroll SP, Hendry AP, Reznick DN, Fox CW. Evolution on ecological time scales. Funct Ecol. 2007;21:387–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01289.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  357. van Oppen MJH, Souter P, Howells EJ, Heyward A, Berkelmans R. Novel genetic diversity through somatic mutations: fuel for adaptation of reef corals? Diversity. 2011;3:405–423. doi: 10.3390/d3030405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  358. Mydlarz LD, McGinty ES, Hravell CD. What are the physiological and immunological responses of coral to climate warming and disease? J Exp Biol. 2010;213:934–945. doi: 10.1242/jeb.037580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Hamada M, Shoguchi E, Shinzato C, Kawashima T, Miller DJ, Satoh N. The complex NOD-like receptor repertoire of the coral Acropora digitifera includes novel domain combinations. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:167–176. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Boyes DC, Nam J, Dangl JL. The Arabidopsis thaliana RPM1 disease resistance gene product is a peripheral plasma membrane protein that is degraded coincident with the hypersensitive response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:15849–15854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  361. Axtell MJ, Stakawicz BJ. Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell. 2003;112:369–377. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Edreva A. Pathogenesis-related proteins: research progress in the last 15 years. Gen Appl Plant Physiol. 2005;31:105–124. [Google Scholar]
  363. Palmer CV, Mydlarz LD, Willis BL. Evidence of an inflammatory-like response in non-normally pigmented tissues of two scleractinian corals. Proc Biol Sci. 2008;275:2687–2693. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Mydlarz LD, Couch CS, Weil E, Smith G, Harvell CD. Immune defenses of healthy, bleached and diseased Montastraea faveolata during a natural bleaching event. Dis Aquat Organ. 2009;87:67–78. doi: 10.3354/dao02088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Palmer C, Bythwll JC, Willis BL. A comparative study of phenoloxidase activity in diseased and bleached colonies of the coral Acropora millepora. Dev Comp Immunol. 2011;35:1098–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Cascales E, Christie PJ. The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1:137–149. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  367. Juhas M, Crook DW, Hood DW. Type IV secretion systems: tools of bacterial gene transfer and virulence. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:2377–2386. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01187.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  368. Technau U, Rudd S, Maxwell P, Gordon PM, Saina M, Grasso LC, Hayward DC, Sensen CW, Saint R, Holstein TW, Ball EE, Miller DJ. Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians. Trends Genet. 2005;21:633–639. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  369. Khalturin K, Hemmeich G, Fraune S, Augustin R, Bosch TC. More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? Trends Genet. 2009;25:404–413. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  370. Forêt S, Knack B, Houliston E, Momose T, Manuel M, Quéinnec E, Hayward DC, Ball EE, Miller DJ. New tricks with old genes: the genetic basis of novel cnidarian traits. Trends Genet. 2010;26:154–158. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  371. Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature. 1989;340:467–468. doi: 10.1038/340467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  372. Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. Enumeration and biomass estimation of planktonic bacteria and viruses by transmission electron microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:352–356. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.2.352-356.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  373. Breitbart M, Salamon P, Andressen B, Mahaffy JM, Segall AM, Mead D, Azam F, Rohwer F. Genomic analysis of uncultured marine viral communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14250–14255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202488399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Williamson SJ, Rusch DB, Yooseph S, Halpern AL, Heidelberg KB, Glass JI, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Fadrosh D, Miller CS, Sutton G, Frazier M, Venter JC. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: metagenomic characterization of viruses within aquatic microbial samples. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Bouvy M, Combe M, Bettarel Y, Dupuy C, Rochelle-Newall E, Charpy L. Uncoupled viral and bacterial distributions in coral reef waters of the Tuamotu Archipelago (French Polynesia) Mar Pollut Bull. 2012;65:506–515. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  376. Dinsdale EA, Pantos O, Smriga S, Edwards RA, Angly F, Wegley L, Hatay M, Hall D, Brown E, Haynes M, Krause L, Sala E, Sandin SA, Thurber RV, Willis BL, Azam F, Knowlton N, Rohwer F. Microbial ecology of four coral atolls in the Northern Line Islands. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  377. Seymour JR, Patten N, Bourne DG, Mitchell JG. Spatial dynamic of virus-like particles and heterotrophic bacteria within a shallow coral reef system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005;288:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  378. Patten NL, Seymour JR, Mitchell JG. Flow cytometric analysis of virus-like particles and heterotrophic bacteria within coral-associated reef water. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2006;86:563–566. doi: 10.1017/S0025315406013476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  379. Leruste A, Bouvier T, Bettarel Y. Enumerating viruses in coral mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6377–6379. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01141-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  380. Davy JE, Patten NL. Morphological diversity of virus-like particles within the surface microlayer of scleractinian corals. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2007;47:37–44. [Google Scholar]
  381. Patten NL, Harrison PL, Mitchell JG. Prevalence of virus-like particles within the staghorn scleractinian coral (Acropora muricata) from the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs. 2008;27:569–580. doi: 10.1007/s00338-008-0356-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  382. Wilson WH, Francis I, Ryan K, Davy SK. Temperature induction of viruses in symbiotic dinoflagellates. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2001;25:99–102. [Google Scholar]
  383. Wilson WH, Dale AL, Davy JE, Davy SK. An enemy within? Observation of virus-like particles in reef corals. Coral Reefs. 2005;24:145–148. doi: 10.1007/s00338-004-0448-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  384. Davy SK, Burchett SG, Dale AL, Davies P, Davy JE, Muncke C, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Wilson WH. Viruses: agents of coral disease? Dis Aquat Org. 2006;69:101–110. doi: 10.3354/dao069101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  385. Correa AM, Welsh RM, Vega Thurber RL. Unique nucleocytoplasmic dsDNA and +ssRNA viruses are associated with dinoflagellate endosymbionts of corals. ISME J. 2013;7:13–27. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Marhaver KL, Edwards RA, Rohwer F. Viral communities associated with health and bleached corals. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2277–2286. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01652.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  387. Vega Thurber RL, Barott KL, Hall D, Liu H, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Desnues C, Edwards RA, Haynes M, Angly FE, Wegley L, Rohwer FL. Metagenomic analysis indicates that stressors induce production of herpes-like viruses in the coral Porites compressa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18413–18418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808985105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. Bettarel Y, Thuy NT, Huy TQ, Hoang PK, Bouvier T. Observation of virus-like particles in thin sections of the bleaching scleractinian coral Acropora cytherea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2013;93:909–912. doi: 10.1017/S0025315411002062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  389. Wilson WH. In: Studies in Viral Ecology, Volume 2. Animal host systems. Hurst CJ, editor. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. Coral viruses; pp. 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  390. Kuznetsov SG, Bosch TC. Self/nonself recognition in Cnidaria: contact of allergenic tissue does not result in elimination of nonself cells in Hydra vulgaris. Zool (Jena) 2003;106:109–116. doi: 10.1078/0944-2006-00105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Rinkevich B. Allorecognition and xenorecognition in reef corals: a decade of interactions. Hydrobiologia. 2004;530–531:443–450. [Google Scholar]
  392. Rinkevich B. Neglected biological features in cnidarians self-nonself recognition. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;738:46–59. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1680-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  393. Bosch TCG. In: Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology. Volume 21. Innate Immunity of Plants, Animals and Humans. Heine H, editor. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2008. The path less explored: innate immune reactions in cnidarians; pp. 27–42. [Google Scholar]
  394. Wood-Charlson EM, Hollingsworth LL, Krupp DA, Weis VM. Lectin/glycan interactions play a role in recognition in a coral/dinoflagellate symbiosis. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:1985–1993. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  395. Hemmrich G, Miller DJ, Bosch TCG. The evolution of immunity: a low-life perspective. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Miller DJ, Hemmrich G, Ball EE, Hayward DC, Khalturin K, Funayama N, Agata K, Bosch TC. The innate immune repertoire in Cnidaria - ancestral complexity and stochastic gene loss. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R59. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  397. Kvennefors ECE, Leggat W, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Degnan BM, Barnes AC. An ancient and variable mannose-binding lectin from the coral Acropora millepora binds both pathogens and symbionts. Dev Comp Immunol. 2008;32:1582–1592. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  398. Bosch TCG, Augustin R, Anton-Erxleben F, Fraune S, Hemmrich G, Zill H, Rosenstiel P, Jacobs G, Schreiber S, Leippe M, Stanisak M, Grötzinger J, Jung S, Podschun R, Bartels J, Harder J, Schröder JM. Uncovering the evolutionary history of innate immunity: the simple metazoan Hydra uses epithelial cells for host defence. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009;33:559–569. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  399. Dunn SR. Immunorecognition and immunoreceptors in the Cnidaria. Invertebrate Surviv J. 2009;6:7–14. [Google Scholar]
  400. Rosenstiel P, Philipp EER, Schreiber S, Bosch TCG. Evolution and function of innate immune receptors - insights from marine invertebrates. J Innate Immun. 2009;1:291–300. doi: 10.1159/000211193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Augustin R, Bosch TCG. Cnidarian immunity: a tale of two barriers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;708:1–16. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8059-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Mydlarz LD, Jones LE, Harvell CD. Innate immunity, environmental drivers, and disease ecology of marine and freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:251–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  403. Widner WR, Wickner RB. Evidence that the SKI antiviral system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by blocking expression of viral mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:4331–4341. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.4331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Brown JT, Bai X, Johnson AW. The yeast antiviral proteins Ski2p, Ski3p and Ski8p exist as a complex in vivo. RNA. 2000;6:449–457. doi: 10.1017/S1355838200991787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  405. Houseley J, Tollervey D. The many pathways of RNA degradation. Cell. 2009;136:763–776. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  406. Arraiano CM, Matos RG, Barbas A. RNase II: The finer details of the modus operandi of a molecular killer. RNA Biol. 2010;7:276–281. doi: 10.4161/rna.7.3.11490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  407. Samuel CE. Antiviral actions of interferon. Interferon-regulated proteins and their surprisingly selective antiviral activities. Virology. 1991;183:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90112-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Haller O, Kochs G, Webe F. The interferon response circuit: Induction and suppression by pathogenic viruses. Virology. 2006;344:119–130. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  409. Fensterl V, Sen GC. Interferons and viral infections. Biofactors. 2009;35:14–20. doi: 10.1002/biof.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  410. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N. IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:623–655. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  411. Dornan D, Eckert M, Wallace M, Shimizu H, Ramsay E, Hupp TR, Ball KL. Interferon regulatory factor 1 binding to p300 stimulates DNA-dependent acetylation of p53. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:10083–10098. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.22.10083-10098.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. Salkowski CA, Barber SA, Detore GR, Vogel SN. Differential dysregulation of nitric oxide production in macrophages with targeted disruptions in INF regulatory factor-1 and -2 genes. J Immunol. 1996;156:3107–3110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  413. Weisz A, Marx P, Sharf R, Appella E, Driggers PH, Ozato K, Levi BZ. Human interferon consensus sequence binding protein is a negative regulator of enhancer elements common to interferon-inducible genes. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:25589–25596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Espert L, Degols G, Gongora C, Blondel D, Williams BR, Silverman RH, Mechti N. ISG20, a new interferon-induced RNase specific for single-stranded RNA, defines an alternative antiviral pathway against RNA genomic viruses. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:16151–16158. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209628200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Taylor GA, Jeffers M, Largaespada DA, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Vande Woude GF. Identification of a novel GTPase, the inducibly expressed GTPase, that accumulates in response to interferon γ. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20399–20405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  416. Haller O, Staeheli P, Kochs G. Interferon-induced Mx proteins in antiviral host defense. Biochimie. 2007;89:812–818. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  417. Pichlmair A, Schulz O, Tan CP, Rehwinkel J, Kato H, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Way M, Schiavo G, Reise Sousa C. Activation of MDA5 requires higher-order RNA structures generated during virus infection. J Virol. 2009;83:10761–10769. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00770-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  418. Deblandre GA, Marinx OP, Evans SS, Majjaj S, Leo O, Caput D, Huez GA, Wathelet MG. Expression cloning of an interferon-inducible 17-kDa membrane protein implicated in the control of cell growth. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23860–23866. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.40.23860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  419. Farrar MA, Schreiber RD. The molecular cell biology of interferon-gamma and its receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:571–611. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.003035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Blasius AL, Giurisato E, Cella M, Schreiber RD, Shaw AS, Colonna M. Bone marrow stromal cell antigen is a specific marker of type 1 IFN-producing cells in the native mouse, but a promiscuous cell surface antigen following IFN stimulation. J Immunol. 2006;177:3260–3265. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  421. Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK, Chen ZJ. Indentification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF3. Cell. 2005;122:669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  422. Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J Virol. 1993;67:2168–2174. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2168-2174.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  423. Yang YL, Li XM. The IAP family: endogenous caspase inhibitors with multiple biological activities. Cell Res. 2000;10:169–177. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  424. Spear PG, Longnecker R. Herpesvirus entry: an update. J Virol. 2003;77:10179–10185. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.19.10179-10185.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  425. Nemerow GR, Wolfert R, McNaughton ME, Cooper NR. Identification and characterization of the Epstein-Barr virus receptor on human B lymphocytes and its relationship to the C3d component receptor (CR2) J Virol. 1985;55:347–351. doi: 10.1128/jvi.55.2.347-351.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  426. Wu FK, Garcia JA, Harrich D, Gaynor RB. Purification of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 enhancer and TAR binding proteins EBP-1 and UBP-1. EMBO J. 1988;7:2117–2130. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03051.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  427. Lu Y, Qian XY, Krug RM. The influenza virus NS1 protein: a novel inhibitor of pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1817–1828. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.15.1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  428. Hale BG, Randall RE, Ortín J, Jackson D. The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2359–2376. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/004606-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  429. Freundlich M, Ramani N, Mathew E, Sirko A, Tsui P. The role of intergration host factor in gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:2557–2563. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  430. Tailor CS, Willett BJ, Kabat D. A putative cell surface receptor for anemia-inducing feline leukemia virus subgroup C is a member of a transporter superfamily. J Virol. 1999;73:6500–6505. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.8.6500-6505.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  431. Bard-Chapeau EA, Jeyakani J, Kok CH, Muller J, Chua BQ, Gunaratne J, Batagov A, Jenjaroenpun P, Kuznetsov VA, Wei CL, D’Andrea RJ, Bourque G, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Ecotopic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) regulates multiple cellular processes important for cancer and is a synergistic partner for FOS protein in invasive tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:2168–2173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119229109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  432. Turk T, Kem WR. The phylum Cnidaria and investigations of its toxins and venoms until 1990. Toxicon. 2009;54:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  433. Anderluh G, Macek P. Cytolytic peptide and protein toxins from sea anemones (Anthozoa: Actiniaria) Toxicon. 2002;40:111–124. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00191-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  434. Frazão B, Vasconcelos V, Antunes A. Sea anemone (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Actiniaria) toxins: an overview. Mar Drugs. 2012;10:1812–1851. doi: 10.3390/md10081812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  435. Weston AJ, Chung R, Dunlap WC, Morandini AC, Marques AC, Moura-da-Silva AM, Ward M, Padilla G, da Silva LF, Andreakis N, Long PF. Proteomic characterisation of toxins isolated from nematocysts of the South Atlantic jellyfish Olindias sambaquiensis. Toxicon. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  436. Brinkman DL, Burnell JN. Biochemical and molecular characterisation of cubozoan protein toxins. Toxicon. 2009;54:1162–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  437. Brinkman DL, Aziz A, Loukas A, Potriquet J, Seymour J, Mulvenna J. Venom proteome of the Box Jellyfish Chironex fleckeri. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  438. Leppla SH. Anthrax toxin edema factor: a bacterial adenylate cyclase that increases cyclic AMP concentrations of eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:3162–3166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  439. Tang WJ, Guo Q. The andenylyl cyclase activity of anthrax edema factor. Mol Aspt Med. 2009;30:423–430. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  440. Van Delden C, Iglewski BH. Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:551–560. doi: 10.3201/eid0404.980405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  441. Yates SP, Merrill AR. Elucidation of eukaryotic elongation factor-2 contact sites within the catalytic domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Biochem J. 2004;379:563–572. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  442. Hinnebusch BJ, Rudolph AE, Cherepanov P, Dixon JE, Schwan TG, Forsberg A. Role of Yersinia murine toxin in survival of Yersinia pestis in the midgut of the flea vector. Science. 2002;296:733–735. doi: 10.1126/science.1069972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  443. Fagerlund A, Lindbäck T, Storset AK, Granum PE, Hardy SP. Bacillus cereus Nhe is a pore-forming toxin with structural and functional properties similar to the ClyA (HlyE, SheA) family of haemolysins, able to induce osmotic lysis in epithelia. Microbiology. 2008;154:693–704. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/014134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  444. Marrack P, Kappler J. The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their relatives. Science. 1990;248:705–711. doi: 10.1126/science.2185544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  445. Voth DE, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:247–263. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.247-263.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  446. Di Pierro M, Lu R, Uzzau S, Wang W, Margaretten K, Pazzani C, Maimone F, Fasano A. Zonula occludens toxin structure-function analysis. Identification of the fragment biologically active on tight junctions and of the zonulin receptor binding domain. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:19160–19165. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009674200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  447. Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and the parthenogenesis of gastroduodenal inflammation. J Infect Dis. 1990;161:626–633. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  448. Miller VL, Taylor RK, Mekalanos JJ. Cholera toxin transcriptional activator toxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein. Cell. 1987;48:271–279. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90430-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  449. Childers BM, Klose KE. Regulation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae: the ToxR regulon. Future Microbiol. 2007;2:335–344. doi: 10.2217/17460913.2.3.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  450. Lanka E, Wilkins BM. DNA processing reactions in bacterial conjugation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:141–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  451. Iredell JR, Manning PA. The toxin-coregulated pilus of Vibrio cholerae 01: a model for type A pilus biogenesis? Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:187–192. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(94)90109-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  452. Kim Y, Wang X, Zhang X-S, Grigoriu S, Page R, Peti W, Wood TK. Escherichia coli toxin/antitoxin pair MqsR/MqsA regulate toxin CspD. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1105–1121. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02147.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  453. Yamanaka K, Zheng W, Crooke E, Wang YH, Inouye M. CspD, a novel DNA replication inhibitor induced during stationary phase in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39:1572–1584. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  454. French CT, Panina EM, Yeh SH, Griffith N, Arambula DG, Miller JF. The Bordella type III secretion system effector BteA contains a conserved N-terminal motif that guides bacterial virulence factors to lipid rafts. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11:1735–1749. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01361.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  455. Espinosa A, Alfano JR. Disabling surveillance: bacterial type III secretion effectors that suppress innate immunity. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6:1027–1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  456. Deane JE, Roversi P, Cordes FS, Johnson S, Kenjale R, Daniell S, Booy F, Picking WD, Picking WL, Blocker AJ, Lea SM. Molecular model of a type III secretion system needle: implication for host cell sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12529–12533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602689103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  457. Jungo F, Bougueleret L, Xenarios I, Poux S. The UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Tox-Prot program: a central hub of integrated venom protein data. Toxicon. 2012;60:551–557. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  458. Chang D, Duda TF Jr. Extensive and continuous duplication facilitates rapid evolution and diversification of gene family. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:2019–2029. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  459. Wong ESW, Belov K. Venom evolution through gene duplication. Gene. 2012;496:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  460. Moura-da-Silva AM, Furlan MS, Caporrino MC, Grego KF, Portes-Junior JA, Clissa PB, Valente RH, Magalhães GS. Diversity of metalloproteinases in Bothrops neuwiedi snake venom transcripts: evidences for recombination between different classes of SVMPs. BMC Genet. 2011;12:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  461. Dutertre S, Jin AH, Kaas Q, Jones A, Alewood PF, Lewis RJ. Deep venomics reveals the mechanism for expanded peptide diversity in cone snail venom. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;12:312–329. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.021469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  462. Starcevic A, Long PF. Diversification of animal venom peptides - were jellyfish amongst the first combinatorial chemists? ChemBiochem. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  463. Fabricius KE. In: Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition. Dubinsky Z, Stambler N, editor. Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht; 2011. Factors determining the resistance of coral reefs to eutrophication: A review and conceptual model; pp. 493–508. [Google Scholar]
  464. Ferrier-Pagès C, Gatusso J-P, Dallot S, Jaubert J. Effect of nutrient enrichment on growth and photosynthesis of the zooxanthellate coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs. 2000;19:103–113. doi: 10.1007/s003380000078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  465. Kramarsky-Winter E, Downs CA, Downs A, Loya Y. Cellular responses in the coral Stylophora pistillata exposed to eutrophication from fish mariculture. Evol Ecol Res. 2009;11:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  466. Goldstone JV, Hamdoun A, Cole BJ, Howard-Ashby M, Nebert DW, Scally M, Dean M, Epel D, Hahn ME, Stegeman JJ. The chemical defensome: environmental sensing and response genes in the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus genome. Dev Biol. 2006;300:366–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  467. Sarasquete C, Segner H. Cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) in teleostean fishes. A review of immunohistochemical studies. Sci Total Environ. 2000;247:313–332. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00500-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  468. Gassman NJ, Kennedy CJ. Cytochrome P-450 content and xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme activity in the scleractinian coral, Favia fragum (Esper) Bull Mar Sci. 1992;50:320–330. [Google Scholar]
  469. Garcia E, Ramos R, Bastidas C. Presence of cytochrome P450 in the Carribean corals Siderastrea sidereal and Montastaea faveolata. Cinc Mar. 2005;31:23–30. [Google Scholar]
  470. Ramos R, Garcia E. Induction of mixed-function oxygenase system and antioxidant enzymes in the coral Montastraea faveolata exposure to benzo(a)pyrene. Comp Biochem Physiol C. Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;144:348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  471. Rougée L, Downs CA, Richmond RH, Ostrander GK. Alteration of normal cellular profiles in the scleractinian coral (Pocillopora damicornis) following laboratory exposure to fuel oil. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006;25:3181–3187. doi: 10.1897/05-510R2.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  472. Goldstone JV. Environmental sensing and response genes in Cnidaria: the chemical defensome in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2008;24:483–502. doi: 10.1007/s10565-008-9107-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  473. Khanal SK, Xie B, Tompson ML, Sung S, Ong SK, Van Leeuwent J. Fate, transport and biodegradation of natural estrogens in the environmental and engineering systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:6537–6546. doi: 10.1021/es0607739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  474. Snyder SA, Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Sedlak DL. Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: Implications for the water industry. Environ Eng Sci. 2003;20:449–469. doi: 10.1089/109287503768335931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  475. Goksøyr A. Endocrine disruptors in the marine environment: mechanisms of toxicity and their influence on reproductive processes in fish. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006;69:175–184. doi: 10.1080/15287390500259483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  476. Tarrant AM, Atkinson MJ, Atkinson S. Effects of steroidal estrogens on coral growth and reproduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;269:121–129. [Google Scholar]
  477. Hayes JD, Flanagan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  478. Karntanut W, Pascoe D. The toxicity of copper, cadmium and zinc to four different Hydra (Cndaria: Hydrozoan) Chemosphere. 2002;47:1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  479. Gadelha JR, Ferreira VAM, Abreu SN, Soars AMVM, Morgado FMR. In: Interdisciplinary Studies on Environmental Chemistry - Biological Responses to Chemical Contaminants: From Molecular to Community Level. Volume 3. Hamamura N, Suzuki S, Mendo S, Barroso CM, Iwata H, Tanabe S, editor. Tokyo: Terrapub; 2010. Experimental mercury bioaccumulation trends in sea anemone Actinia equina exposed to chlor-alkali industry effluent contaminated water; pp. 149–157. [Google Scholar]
  480. Alutoin S, Boberg J, Nyström M, Tedengren M. Effects of the multiple stressors copper and reduced salinity on the metabolism of the hermatypic coral Porites lutea. Mar Environ Res. 2001;52:289–299. doi: 10.1016/S0141-1136(01)00105-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  481. Nyström M, Nordemar I, Tedengren M. Simultaneous and sequential stress from increased temperature and copper on the metabolism of the hermatypic coral Porites cylindrica. Mar Biol. 2001;138:1225–1231. doi: 10.1007/s002270100549. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  482. Mitchelmore CL, Verde EA, Weis VM. Uptake and partitioning of copper and cadmium in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Aquat Toxicol. 2007;85:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  483. Bielmyer GK, Grosell M, Bhagooli R, Baker AC, Langdon C, Gillette P, Capo TR. Differential effects of copper on three species of scleractinian corals and their algal symbionts (Symbiodinium spp.) Aquat Toxicol. 2010;97:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  484. Bastidas C, Garcia EM. Sublethal effects of mercury and its distribution in the coral Porites astreoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;267:133–143. [Google Scholar]
  485. Farina O, Ramos R, Bastidas C, García E. Biochemical response of cnidarian larvae to mercury and benzo(a)pyrene exposure. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;81:553–557. doi: 10.1007/s00128-008-9534-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  486. Negri AP, Howard AJ. Inhibition of coral fertilisation and larval metamorphosis by tributyltin and copper. Mar Environ Res. 2001;51:17–27. doi: 10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  487. Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Harrison PL. The effect of selected trace metals on the fertilzation success of several scleractinian coral species. Coral Reefs. 2005;24:524–534. doi: 10.1007/s00338-005-0013-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  488. Victor S, Richmond RH. Effect of copper on fertilisation success in the reef coral Acropora surculosa. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;50:1448–1451. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  489. Jones RJ. Zooxanthellae loss as a bioassay for assessing stress in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997;149:163–171. [Google Scholar]
  490. Reitzel AM, Sullivan JC, Traylor-Knowles N, Finnerty JR. Genomic survey of candidate stress-response genes in the estuarine anemone Nematostella vectensis. Biol Bull. 2008;214:233–254. doi: 10.2307/25470666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  491. Steele RA, Opella SJ. Structures of the reduced and mercury-bound forms of MerP, the periplasmic protein from the bacterial mercury detoxification system. Biochemistry. 1997;36:688–6895. doi: 10.1021/bi9621829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  492. Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP. Arsenate reductases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:745–748. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  493. Hyakawa T, Kobayashi Y, Cui X, Hirano S. A new metabolic pathway of arsenite:arsenic-glutathione complexes are substrates for human arsenic methyltransferase Cyt19. Arch Toxicol. 2005;79:183–191. doi: 10.1007/s00204-004-0620-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  494. Price RE, London J, Wallaschläger D, Ruiz-Chancho MJ, Pichler T. Enhanced bioaccumulation and biotransformation of As in coral reef organisms surrounding a marine shallow-water hydrothermal vent system. Chem Geol. 2012. [DOI]
  495. David CP. Heavy metal concentrations in growth bands of corals: a record of mine tailings input through time (Marinduque Island, Philippines) Mar Poll Bull. 2003;46:187–196. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00315-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  496. Pessi G, Hass D. Transcriptional control of the hydrogen cyanide biosynthetic genes hcnABC by the anaerobic regulator ANR and the quorum-sensing regulators LasR and RhlR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Baceriol. 2000;182:6940–6949. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.24.6940-6949.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  497. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447:396–398. doi: 10.1038/nature05913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  498. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. J Evol Biol. 1998;11:159–183. doi: 10.1007/s000360050073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  499. Mirouze M, Paszkowski J. Epigenetic contribution to stress adaptation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  500. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403:41–45. doi: 10.1038/47412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  501. Wang M, Mok MW, Harper H, Lee WH, Min J, Knapp S, Oppermann U, Marsden B, Schapira M. Structural genomics of histone tail recognition. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2629–2630. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  502. Goll MG, Bestor TH. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:481–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.010904.153721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  503. Slokin RK, Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:272–285. doi: 10.1038/nrg2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  504. Wolffe AP, Jones PL, Wade PA. DNA demethylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5894–5896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  505. Ooi SK, Bestor TH. The colorful history of active DNA demethylation. Cell. 2008;133:1145–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  506. Zhu JK. Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:143–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  507. Branco MR, Ficz G, Reik W. Uncovering the role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the epigenome. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;13:7–13. doi: 10.1038/nrg3080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  508. Guo JU, Su Y, Zhong C, Ming GL, Song H. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell. 2011;145:423–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  509. Roberts SB, Gavery MR. Is there a relationship between DNA methylation and phenotypic plasticity in invertebrates? Front Physiol. 2012;2:116. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  510. Brown BE, Cossins AR. In: Coral Reefs: And Ecosystem in Transition. Dubinski Z, Stambler N, editor. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011. The potential for temperature acclimatisation of reef corals in the face of climate change; pp. 421–433. [Google Scholar]
  511. Gilbert SF, McDonald E, Boyle N, Buttino N, Gyi L, Mai M, Prakash N, Robinson J. Symbiosis as a source of selectable epigenetic variation: taking the heat for the big guy. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2010;365:671–678. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  512. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen DG, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  513. Apache-Tomcat. [ http://tomcat.apache.org/download-70.cgi]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1: Table S16b

Predicted (UniProt) homologues of animal toxins encoded in the genome of A. digitifera.

Click here for file (40.3KB, docx)

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES