Abstract
Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the transsulfuration pathway, which is critical for eukaryotes to synthesize cysteine from methionine. CBS uses a coenzyme pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP) for catalysis and S-adenosylmethionine regulates the activity of human CBS, but not yeast CBS. Human and fruit fly CBS contain heme; however, the role for heme is not clear. This paper reports biochemical and spectroscopic characterization of CBS from fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (DmCBS) and the CO/NO gas binding reactions of DmCBS and human CBS. Like CBS enzymes from lower organisms (e.g. yeast), DmCBS is intrinsically highly active and is not regulated by AdoMet. The DmCBS heme coordination environment, reactivity and the accompanying effects on enzyme activity are similar to those of human CBS. The DmCBS heme bears histidine and cysteine axial ligands, and the enzyme becomes inactive when the cysteine ligand is replaced. The Fe(II)heme in DmCBS is less stable than that in human CBS, undergoing more facile reoxidation and ligand exchange. In both CBS proteins, the overall stability of the protein is correlated with the heme oxidation state. Human and DmCBS Fe(II) hemes react relatively slowly with CO and NO, and the rate of the CO-binding reaction is faster at low pH than at high pH. Together the results suggest that heme incorporation and AdoMet regulation in CBS are not correlated, possibly providing two independent means to regulate the enzyme.
Introduction
Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS, EC 4.2.1.22) catalyzes the condensation of homocysteine and serine to cystathionine (Scheme 1, Reaction 1). This reaction is the first and rate-limiting step in the transsulfuration pathway (1), a metabolic pathway critical for eukaryotes to synthesize cysteine from the essential amino acid methionine. Deficiency in CBS activity leads to a pathological homocystinuria (1–4). In addition to the canonical cystathionine synthesis reaction, CBS also catalyzes several other β-replacement reactions, including two cysteine synthesis reactions (Scheme 1, Reaction 2 and 3). Reaction 3 is responsible for cysteine biosynthesis in bacteria and plants, which is catalyzed by a related enzyme cysteine synthase (CS, EC 2.5.1.47, other commonly used names: O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase, O-acetylserine(thio)lyase).
Scheme 1.
Human CBS (hCBS) is a homotetramer and each monomer (63kDa, 551 amino acids) has a modular structure comprising an N-terminal heme binding domain (residues 1–70), a catalytic core region containing the PLP coenzyme (residues 71–413) and a C-terminal auto-inhibitory domain (residues 414–551). The C-terminal domain of CBS binds the allosteric regulator S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet). AdoMet binding increases the enzyme activity approximately 4-fold (5–7). A truncated dimeric variant of hCBS (hCBS45, residues 1–413, 45kDa) lacking the C-terminal region has been crystallized (8, 9). In the crystal structure, the PLP coenzyme binds to Lys119 in the core region; the heme is coordinated to Cys52 and His65 in the N-terminal domain. The catalytic core is highly conserved among the CBS enzymes and related CS enzymes, and displays significant structural conservation with several other members of the fold-II family of PLP-dependent enzymes (10, 11).
CBS is the only known enzyme to have both PLP and heme cofactors. The catalytic chemistry of CBS can be solely explained by a typical PLP-dependent mechanism (12). In fact, CBS proteins from lower organisms such as S. cerevisiae and T. cruzi do not have heme and are still highly active (13–15). While the heme does not have a catalytic role, there is clear evidence that changes in the heme environment in hCBS affect enzyme activity. For example, even though heme is not responsible for the catalytic chemistry, hCBS requires heme to achieve maximum activity (16). Furthermore, in all cases studied, disruption of the bond between the heme and its cysteine-thiolate ligand results in loss of enzyme activity (17–22). One plausible hypothesis is that heme and AdoMet regulation act in concert to regulate PLP affinity and enzyme activity. For example, yeast CBS (yCBS) does not bind heme and is not regulated by AdoMet (13–15), whereas hCBS has heme and responds to AdoMet stimulation. Yeast CBS has a significantly lower in vitro affinity for PLP than hCBS, and an hCBS variant with the heme binding N-terminal domain deleted exhibits a similarly low affinity for PLP (14, 16). Despite these correlations, the exact function of heme in CBS remains unknown.
It is of interest to know whether there is a connection between heme binding, enzyme activity and AdoMet regulation. One way to investigate this question is to take an evolutionary approach, looking at CBS enzymes from organisms that fall between Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the evolutionary tree of life. Drosophila melanogaster is such an organism; therefore it is valuable to ask whether or not its CBS contains heme and responds to AdoMet. Drosophila melanogaster CBS (DmCBS) is similar to yet different from hCBS. Unlike hCBS, which is a tetramer, DmCBS is a dimer shown by X-ray crystallography (23) and native gel electrophoresis. The catalytic core region (residues 40–380) of DmCBS exhibits high sequence similarity (85% homology, 62% sequence identity) to hCBS; the C-terminal domain (residues 381–522) of DmCBS is almost the same size as that of hCBS but is less conserved (59% homology, 24% sequence identity); the N-terminal domain (residues 1–39) of DmCBS is significantly shorter, but does contain residues (Cys22 and His34, Figure 1) analogous to those that serve as heme ligands in hCBS. In the recently reported crystal structures of DmCBS, heme indeed is coordinated to these residues. The 3-D structures of the heme-binding domain and the catalytic core of DmCBS are very similar to those of hCBS45.
Figure 1.
Sequence alignment of hCBS, DmCBS, Entamoeba histolytica cysteine synthase (EhCS), Salmonella typhimurium cysteine synthase (StCS) and an O-acetylserine-dependent CBS-like protein from Bacillus subtilis (BsMccA). Asterisks indicate identical amino acids, small dots indicate semi-conservative replacement. Residues in black background form the active site pocket in the crystal structures (8, 23–26) as identified by castP (27). The PLP and heme binding residues are marked with ▲. The residues hydrogen bonded to the PLP or heme in the crystal structures are marked with ●. The residues hydrogen bonded to the substrates/products in the crystal structures are marked with ○.
Here we report the biochemical and spectroscopic characterization of DmCBS and study of the CO and NO gas binding reactions of hCBS, hCBS45 and DmCBS. We demonstrate that DmCBS is active both in the canonical cystathionine synthesis reaction and two alternative cysteine synthesis reactions, but does not respond to AdoMet stimulation. The DmCBS heme exhibits characteristics similar to those of hCBS. Fe(II)DmCBS undergoes pH- mediated redox and thermal ligand switching, but the reduced heme of DmCBS is less stable than that of hCBS. CO binds slowly to Fe(II)DmCBS and to Fe(II)hCBS, with rates that vary with pH. In the CO adducts, the heme-cysteine thiolate bond is disrupted and the enzyme activity is lost. Based on these findings, we conclude that incorporation of heme into CBS and AdoMet regulation of CBS are not correlated, and are characteristics that emerged separately in the course of evolution.
Materials and methods
Materials
Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or Fluka and were used as received. Nitric oxide (NO) gas was generated in situ by reaction of NaNO2, CuCl2 and l-ascorbic acid. Ninhydrin reagent was prepared by dissolving 0.25 g ninhydrin in 4 mL concentrated HCl and 6 mL glacial acetic acid.
Cloning of DmCBS
The DmCBS sequence was subcloned into a pGEX-6P1 vector following a similar strategy to that used for the human CBS expression construct (28). The resulting pGEX-6P1-DMCBS enabled us to express DmCBS as a fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase (GST), from which GST could be cleaved off with HRV 3C protease (AG Scientific) leaving a single extra residue (Gly) at the N-terminus of DmCBS polypeptide. Briefly, the DmCBS sequence was amplified by PCR from a first strand cDNA using a forward primer containing an ApaI site (5′-ctagGGGCCCcaaccgaagccatacgagagg) and a reverse primer containing a NotI site (5′-ctagGCGGCCGCgatcagaactggagaacgc). After cleavage with ApaI and NotI (NEB Biolabs), the DmCBS fragment was purified and isolated by excision from a 1% agarose gel, and cleaned up using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen). Subsequently, DmCBS was ligated into the ApaI-NotI linearized pGEX-6P1 vector, in which an internal ApaI site was abolished previously by site directed mutagenesis (28). The construct pGEX-6P1-DMCBS was transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue cells (Stratagene) and its authenticity was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Verified plasmid was transformed into E. coli Rosetta2 (DE3) expression host cells (Novagen).
Expression and Purification of CBS
Human CBS (hCBS) was expressed and purified as described previously (29). DmCBS was purified in an otherwise identical fashion with the following specific modifications. After cleavage of the fusion protein with HRV 3C protease, GST was removed chromatographically on DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow (GE Healthcare). The column was equilibrated in 15 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 10% ethylene glycol. Under these conditions, both GST and DmCBS proteins bind to the DEAE Sepharose resin. The separation of the GST from DmCBS was achieved by elution with a linear gradient from 15 to 75 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 10% ethylene glycol. Unlike hCBS, DmCBS elutes prior to the GST. Protein-containing fractions were analyzed by electrophoresis on 9% SDS–PAGE. The DmCBS-rich fractions were pooled and subsequently concentrated on YM-30 membrane (Millipore). The buffer was exchanged by pressure dialysis to 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 1 mM TCEP and 0.01% Tween 20.
CBS Activity Assays
The activities of hCBS, hCBS45, yCBS and DmCBS in the canonical cystathionine synthesis reaction (Reaction 1) were determined using a radiochemical assay as described previously (13). The activities in the two alternative cysteine synthesis reactions (Reaction 2 and 3) were measured using a colorimetric reaction described by Gaitonde (30) with the following modifications. To monitor cysteine synthesis, the reaction mixture (600 µL) contained: 0.5 mg/mL BSA, 10 mM DTT, 0.0168 mg/mL enzyme, 24 mM l-serine or O-acetyl-l-serine, 25.5 mM Na2S and optionally 0.5 mM PLP and/or 0.36 mM AdoMet in 200 mM Tris (pH 8.6) buffer. The reaction temperature was 37 °C and the reaction was initiated by adding the enzyme. At five different time points 100 µL of the reaction mixture was taken and mixed with 20 µL 50% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The precipitated protein was removed by centrifugation. The supernatant (100 µL) was combined with 100 µL acetic acid and 100 µL ninhydrin reagent; the mixture was heated in a boiling water bath for 3 minutes and immediately cooled in ice water. The absorbance at 560 nm was measured to determine the amount of cysteine produced. A standard curve was generated by the same method using cysteine solutions of known concentration and containing all other reagents except enzyme. Under these conditions, the enzymes were fully saturated with substrates ([substrate]>10Km, data not shown).
Mass Spectrometry
As-isolated and AdoMet-treated DmCBS and hCBS were analyzed by mass spectrometry for the presence of AdoMet. As-isolated DmCBS and hCBS were diluted directly into 0.1% acetic acid in 5:95 methanol/water. AdoMet-treated DmCBS and hCBS were diluted into and incubated with 0.36 mM AdoMet in 200 mM Tris (pH 8.6) buffer at 37°C for 20 min. All samples were then desalted at room temperature using two consecutive detergent removal spin columns (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to manufacturer instructions. Columns were pre-equilibrated with 0.1% acetic acid in 5:95 methanol/water, and the CBS samples were eluted off the column in the same solvent. Prior to mass spectrometry analysis, the CBS samples were diluted with acetic acid and methanol to achieve 1% acetic acid in 50:50 methanol/aqueous sample. Mass spectrometry data were acquired using a 7T linear trap/FT-ICR (LTQ FT Ultra) hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., Bremen, Germany) equipped with an automated chip-based nano-ESI source (Triversa NanoMate, Advion BioSciences, Ithaca, NY). The resolving power of the FT-ICR mass analyzer was set at 200,000. The spray voltage was 1.3–1.5 kV relative to the inlet of the mass spectrometer.
Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy
Electronic absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary 4 Bio spectrophotometer. The spectral bandwidth was set to 0.5 nm. Temperature was controlled by a Peltier temperature controller at 20 °C, unless otherwise stated. CBS samples (200 µL, 5 µM heme) were prepared in 200 mM buffers unless otherwise indicated. Tris buffer (pH 8.6, 9.0) and MES buffer (pH 6.0) were used in these experiments. All buffer solutions contained an additional 100 mM NaCl and were degassed with argon before use. The samples were placed in septum-sealed quartz microcuvettes purged with argon gas. Addition of other reagents was done by injecting the reagents into a sealed cuvette using a gas-tight syringe followed by gently mixing on a vortex mixer. Solutions of sodium dithionite (60 mM Na2S2O4) in Ar-degassed Tris buffer (pH 8.6, 9.0) or MES buffer (pH 6.0) were prepared and used within 20 min of preparation. These dithionite solutions were added to Fe(III)CBS to achieve a final concentration of 10 mM dithionite in the cuvette. CO was supplied in the form of CO gas-saturated buffer (100 µL); the appropriate pH buffer was deoxygenated with argon prior to saturation with CO. NO gas (100 µL) was injected to the headspace of the cuvette using a gas-tight syringe. Spectra were recorded immediately after addition and mixing of reagents. Absorbance data were corrected for the concentration change caused by dilution when appropriate. At the concentration used (10 mM Na2S2O4), the dithionite ion concentration is expected to remain essentially unchanged for at least 2 hours at pH 6.0.(31, 32) Data for 60 minutes of CO binding were analyzed at this low pH, and were sufficient for the reaction to go to completion. All other experiments that utilized dithionite solutions at pH 6.0 were completed in less than 2 hours.
Thermal Characterization
To characterize the thermal stability of CBS proteins, the absorption spectra of an anaerobic protein sample (200 µL, 5 µM) in 200 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.6) were monitored between 20°C and 92°C at 2°C intervals. A full spectrum was recorded at each temperature after thermal equilibration for 3 minutes. A steady decrease in absorbance is followed by a steep increase due to light scattering of precipitated protein around the melting point. The absorbance drops again after the precipitates fall to the bottom of the cuvette. The Tm was defined as the inflection point when absorbance was plotted against temperature, averaged from three independent experiments. Errors in the observed Tm are determined by the temperature interval used and are no more than ±2°C.
Kinetic Analysis
Electronic absorption spectral data for the CO binding reactions was analyzed to determine the apparent mechanism of CO binding. Briefly, the CO binding reactions were followed spectrophotometrically; complete spectra were recorded at 15 sec intervals until no further changes were observed. Because Fe(III)CBS, Fe(II)CBS and Fe(II)CBS-CO have distinct Soret absorption maxima, changes in their Soret absorbances over time were fitted simultaneously using SciPy (33) to a biexponential equation ΔA = a1exp(b1t) + a2exp(b2t) − (a1+a2) derived from the following model unless otherwise stated:

The rate constants k1 and k2 are pH-dependent; k3 is [CO]-dependent. b1, b2 are functions of k1, k2, k3 and b1+b2 = −(k1+k2+k3), b1b2 = k1k3 (see Supporting Information for details).
Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis
Protein sequences were obtained from UniProt (34). Multiple sequence alignment was done using Clustal Omega (35) and edited in JalView (36). Crystallographic data were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (37) and visualized in PyMol (38).
Results
Enzyme Activity
The activity of DmCBS is higher than or comparable to that of hCBS in the three different reactions; however, AdoMet does not simulate DmCBS activity. Table 1 compares the activity of DmCBS and hCBS in the classical cystathionine synthesis reaction (Reaction 1) and the two alternative cysteine synthesis reactions (Reaction 2 and 3). DmCBS is more active in cystathionine synthesis than hCBS in the absence of AdoMet, exhibiting activity comparable to yCBS and the hCBS45 variant lacking the C-terminal autoinhibitory domain when exogenous PLP is present. In cysteine synthesis, DmCBS is less active than yCBS or hCBS45, with activity comparable to hCBS in the absence of AdoMet. Unlike hCBS, DmCBS does not respond to AdoMet stimulation; the activity of DmCBS in each of the three different reactions was not altered upon addition of a 1200-fold molar excess of AdoMet (0.36 mM). Even at 5.0 mM AdoMet (17000-fold excess), no stimulation of DmCBS activity was observed. DmCBS is somewhat more active than hCBS in catalyzing Reaction 3, possibly due to better accommodation of the O-acetylserine substrate.
Table 1.
Specific activities of hCBS, hCBS45, DmCBS and yCBS at pH 8.6, 37 °C (U/mg of protein) under Vmax conditions. One unit of activity is defined as formation of 1 µmol product in 1 hour. The assay mixture (in 200 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.6) contained: 0.5 mg/mL BSA, 10 mM DTT, 0.0168 mg/mL enzyme, 10 mM l-serine and 10 mM L-homocysteine for Reaction 1, 24 mM L-serine or O-acetyl-l-serine and 25.5 mM Na2S for Reactions 2 and 3, and when indicated, 0.5 mM PLP and/or 0.36 mM AdoMet. The AdoMet response is defined as the ratio of specific activities with and without AdoMet, respectively.
| Specific Activity (U/mg of protein) | AdoMet Response | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLP | − | − | + | + | −PLP | +PLP |
| AdoMet | − | + | − | + | ||
| Reaction 1: serine + homocysteine → cystathionine + H2O | ||||||
| hCBS | 81±9 | 228±16 | 106±4 | 424±27 | 2.8±0.4 | 4.0±0.3 |
| hCBS45 | 980±51 | 1070±25 | 1104±38 | 1152±29 | 1.09±0.06 | 1.04±0.04 |
| DmCBS | 576±5 | 529±17 | 1227±94 | 1279±33 | 0.92±0.03 | 1.04±0.08 |
| yCBS | 831±45 | 894±39 | 1245±155 | 1260±170 | 1.08±0.07 | 1.0±0.2 |
| Reaction 2: serine + H2S → cysteine + H2O | ||||||
| hCBS | 37±2 | 60±4 | 31±4 | 109±1 | 1.6±0.1 | 3.5±0.4 |
| hCBS45 | 136±15 | 140±0 | 200±5 | 196±3 | 1.0±0.1 | 0.98±0.03 |
| DmCBS | 38±2 | 36±2 | 42±1 | 41±3 | 0.94±0.08 | 0.98±0.08 |
| yCBS | 226±6 | 219±14 | 223±3 | 219±15 | 0.97±0.07 | 0.98±0.07 |
| Reaction 3: O-acetylserine + H2S → cysteine + CH3COOH | ||||||
| hCBS | 13±1 | 21±1 | 14±1 | 32±1 | 1.6±0.1 | 2.3±0.2 |
| hCBS45 | 104±1 | 107±3 | 140±5 | 137±3 | 1.03±0.03 | 0.98±0.04 |
| DmCBS | 31±2 | 30±2 | 36±1 | 37±3 | 1.0±0.1 | 1.03±0.09 |
| yCBS | 148±3 | 152±3 | 148±1 | 145±1 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.98±0.01 |
To test whether DmCBS binds to AdoMet, as-isolated and AdoMet-treated DmCBS samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Ion trap mass spectra of DmCBS, with and without preincubation with AdoMet, are shown in Figure 2. The FT data reveal a mass of 56877 Da for the DmCBS protein (Figure S1); the calculated mass of the heme-free protein is 56882 Da. Heme dissociates upon ionization and appears as a characteristic mass peak at 616 (FePPIX calculated mass 616.487). Control AdoMet solutions under similar experimental conditions exhibit a peak at m/z 399 (AdoMet calculated mass 398.14). Neither DmCBS sample showed a mass peak at 399, suggesting that DmCBS does not bind to AdoMet. The same mass spectrometric analysis was performed using hCBS as a control, since hCBS is known to bind AdoMet. The AdoMet mass peak was absent in the as-isolated hCBS spectrum, but present in the AdoMet-treated hCBS spectrum (data not shown). These results show that DmCBS and hCBS were isolated free of AdoMet; upon incubation with AdoMet, hCBS bound AdoMet but DmCBS did not.
Figure 2.
Ion trap mass spectra of as-isolated (A) and AdoMet-treated (B) DmCBS. The mass peak at 616 is heme. Lack of a mass peak at 399 indicates the absence of AdoMet. The other low mass peaks at 239 and 409, are common plasticizers that were present in the respective background solvent samples.
pH-dependent Redox Behavior of DmCBS
The DmCBS heme exhibits spectral features and pH dependent redox behaviors that are similar to those of hCBS and hCBS45 (Figure 3). The electronic absorption spectrum of as-isolated DmCBS at pH 8.6 is shown as a solid line in Figure 3, DmCBS panel, with absorption bands at 367 (δ band), 429 (Soret or γ band) and 552nm (α–β bands). Identical heme absorption features are observed at pH 6.0 (Figure 4(B), solid line). The A429/A282 ratio is 1.02, which is similar to that of hCBS (1.07). Based on the spectral similarity to Fe(III)hCBS (39), the asisolated DmCBS contains a low-spin Fe(III) heme with one cysteine thiolate ligand and additional neutral donor ligand, presumably histidine. At pH 8.6, Fe(III)DmCBS is readily reduced by sodium dithionite to give a new, Fe(II)DmCBS species with a spectrum similar to that of Fe(II)hCBS. Upon reduction, the Soret band sharpens and red shifts to 448 nm and the broad α/β absorption envelope sharpens, to give two unsymmetrical α and β bands at 574 and 540 nm (dashed line in Figure 3, DmCBS panel) indicative of a six-coordinate, low-spin, thiolate-ligated heme. At pH 6.0, Fe(III)DmCBS did not appear to react with dithionite, as there was no change observed in the electronic absorption spectrum (Figure 4(B), solid line and dashed line). This result suggested that the protein remained in the Fe(III) state even in the presence of excess reducing agent. This result is in contrast to hCBS; transient formation of Fe(II)hCBS was observed followed by pH-dependent reoxidation to Fe(III)hCBS (39). When Fe(II)DmCBS at pH 8.6 and in the presence of excess dithionite was subjected to a pH shift by addition of concentrated pH 6.0 buffer, the protein immediately reoxidized to Fe(III)DmCBS (Figure 4(A), dashed line to dotted line). Conversely, when Fe(III)DmCBS at pH 6.0 and in the presence of excess dithionite was subjected to a pH shift by addition of concentrated pH 8.6 buffer, the protein immediately reduced to Fe(II)DmCBS (Figure 4(B), dashed line to dotted line). At an intermediate pH (7.4), the electronic absorption spectrum in the presence of excess dithionite showed a mixture of Fe(III) and Fe(II) species (Figure S2). These observations suggest that the DmCBS heme behaves similarly to the hCBS heme, with pH-dependent redox processes that are fully reversible (39). The difference is that DmCBS never appears to be reduced at low pH, presumably because the reoxidation process is very fast and the equilibrium position favors the reoxidized species.
Figure 3.
Optical spectra of the Fe(III)- (solid line), Fe(II)- (dashed line) and ligand-switched (dotted line) states of hCBS (pH 9.0), hCBS45 (pH 9.0) and DmCBS (pH 8.6). In the case of DmCBS, the ligand-switch is incomplete and the spectrum shows a mixture of switched and unswitched species (see text). Peak positions are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 4.
Electronic absorption spectra showing pH-dependent reversible conversion between Fe(III)-and Fe(II)DmCBS. Peak positions are summarized in Table 2. (A) solid line: 5 µM Fe(III)DmCBS in 200 mM pH 8.6 Tris buffer; dashed line: the heme iron is reduced to Fe(II) state by 10 mM sodium dithionite; dotted line: the heme iron is reoxidized to Fe(III) after lowering the pH to 6.0 by adding 1.5M pH 6.0 MES buffer. (B) solid line: 5 µM Fe(III)DmCBS in 200 mM pH 6.0 MES buffer; dashed line: the heme iron stays in Fe(III) state after adding dithionite; dotted line: the heme iron is reduced to Fe(II) state after raising the pH to 8.6 by adding 1.5 M pH 8.6 Tris buffer.
Thermal stability of DmCBS
Fe(III)DmCBS is as thermally stable as Fe(III)hCBS, but the heme of Fe(II)DmCBS is significantly less stable than that of Fe(II)hCBS. Two different thermal stabilities were examined: 1) the thermal stability of the heme ligation environment, and 2) the thermal stability of the entire protein (thermal unfolding melting temperature). The reduced CBS heme undergoes a thermally induced ligand-switch process in which the cysteine thiolate is replaced by an unidentified neutral ligand, leading to a blue-shifted Soret at 424 nm (Figure 3). Fe(II)hCBS and Fe(II)hCBS45 undergo this ligand-switch process with midpoint transition temperatures of 44°C and 43°C, respectively; the same process occurs very slowly at 37°C (18, 40). Fe(II)DmCBS showed a similar ligand-switch process which proceeds with a midpoint transition temperature of 37°C (Figure S5). When held at 37°C, the rate of ligand switching is significantly faster for Fe(II)DmCBS than for Fe(II)hCBS. Even at 30°C, a full, clean conversion cannot be achieved because during the ligand switch process, as both the newly formed ligand switched species (Fe(II)DmCBS-424) and the original Fe(II)DmCBS protein denature upon extended heating (>3 hr). Because DmCBS appeared to denature before the ligand switch process was complete, we compared the melting temperature of DmCBS to that of hCBS to identify differences in the protein stabilities. Thermal denaturation was measured by light scattering at 800 nm; the unfolding is irreversible and the protein visibly precipitates. The melting temperatures (Tm) for Fe(II)DmCBS and Fe(II)hCBS are comparable – the transition midpoints occur at 52°C and 51°C, respectively (see Supporting Information). The melting temperature of Fe(III)DmCBS is 59°C, which is slightly higher than the reported Tm of 55°C for Fe(III)hCBS (41). These observations suggest that the overall stabilities of human and DmCBS proteins are influenced by the heme oxidation state. When the heme is oxidized, DmCBS is more stable than hCBS; however, the when the heme is reduced the two proteins exhibit fairly comparable stabilities. In contrast, the heme environment stabilities are comparable in the Fe(III) state, but differ in the reduced, Fe(II) state, where reoxidation and ligand switching are more facile for DmCBS.
Gas-binding Reactions of CBS
Fe(II)DmCBS, Fe(II)hCBS and Fe(II)hCBS45 react with CO in a pH dependent manner. Three proteins, DmCBS, hCBS and hCBS45 were reacted with CO at high and low pH. None showed appreciable gas binding in the oxidized, Fe(III) state; no changes were observed in the electronic absorption spectra after addition of CO. When dithionite was present, all three proteins reacted with and bound CO on time scales of hours. The CO-bound CBS proteins show no detectable activity. For each of the three proteins, under all pH conditions, the CO-bound product was the same regardless of the order of addition of dithionite and CO; the spectra of the final CO-adducts are characteristic of low-spin Fe(II) CO-bound hemes with blue-shifted Soret peaks and symmetrical, flattened α and β bands (Figure 5 and Table 2). The Soret peak positions (414 nm, DmCBS; 420 nm, hCBS) indicate that the cysteine thiolate ligand is no longer bound to the heme iron in these CO adducts (40). The rate of CO binding was monitored at high pH, where the hemes appeared to be fully reduced, and at low pH, where the hemes appear to be oxidized even in the presence of dithionite. The high pH condition was chosen so as to be high enough to stabilize the reduced protein: pH 8.6 for DmCBS, pH 9.0 for hCBS and hCBS45. The electronic absorption changes were monitored as a function of time, after addition of dithionite and CO in either addition order (CO, dithionite; dithionite, CO). At high pH, DmCBS, hCBS and hCBS45 were all reduced immediately upon addition of dithionite; the product Fe(II) species then bound CO at a slower rate. This two-phase process was observed regardless of the order of addition of the reagents and for all three proteins (DmCBS, hCBS, hCBS45). The CO binding process was different at low pH (6.0). None of the proteins were ever present in a fully reduced state, even when dithionite was added first (vide supra, and see (39)). When CO was added, and regardless of the order of addition, DmCBS and hCBS reacted with CO to form the same low-spin Fe(II)-CO-bound product species seen at high pH (identical visible spectra); however, the rate of CO binding was faster at low pH than at high pH. Although the dominant species observed spectroscopically are the Fe(III) and Fe(II)CO forms of DmCBS and hCBS, it is evident from the presence of a small amount of Fe(II) that the reaction must proceed via the reduced species. In contrast with DmCBS and hCBS, the CO adduct of hCBS45 appears to be unstable at pH 6.0; the intensity of the Soret absorption due to the Fe(III) species diminishes without a concomitant increase in other bands.
Figure 5.
Electronic absorption spectra of the CO adducts (solid lines) and NO adducts (dashed lines) of hCBS (pH 9.0), hCBS45 (pH 9.0) and DmCBS (pH 8.6). In the case of DmCBS, a small amount of unreacted Fe(II)DmCBS remains present, as evidenced by the shoulder at 450 nm and greater intensity in the α band.
Table 2.
Peak positions (nm) in the absorption spectra of DmCBS, hCBS and hCBS45.
| hCBS | hCBS45 | DmCBS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soret/γ, β, α | Soret/γ, β, α | Soret/γ, β, α | |
| Fe(III) form | 430, 553 | 429, 552 | 429, 552 |
| Fe(II) form | 449, 540, 573 | 449, 540, 573 | 448, 540, 574 |
| Ligand switched form | 424, 528, 559 | 424, 529, 558 | 424 (only partially converted) |
| CO adduct | 420, 539, 570 | 419, 537, 568 | 414, 539, 570 |
| NO adduct | 397, 539, 566 | 395, 540, 570 | 397, 540, 573 |
A kinetic analysis of the absorbance data for these CO binding reactions was carried out as described in the Experimental section. The results are tabulated in Table S1. The data for the reaction of Fe(III)hCBS, with dithionite added before CO at pH 9.0, are best fitted by a single exponential equation. This fit gives k3 = 0.016 min−1, the rate constant for CO binding to the reduced CBS heme. This rate is remarkably slow, presumably due to the fact that the thiolate ligand must dissociate from the heme in order for CO to bind. In all other cases, a biexponential equation is necessary to fit the data. The biexponential equation models a system consisting of a reversible redox process, between the Fe(III)/Fe(II) oxidation states, and an irreversible gas binding process where CO binds only to the Fe(II) state. That this model is required to fit the data implies that even after addition of excess dithionite and with no visual evidence in the electronic absorption spectrum, a portion of the protein remains in the Fe(III) state. Consistent with a requirement for protonation and loss of the thiolate ligand prior to CO binding, the observed rate constant (kobs=k1k3) for CO binding is significantly faster at low pH (hCBS 0.053 min−1, DmCBS 0.094 min−1) than at high pH (hCBS 0.0064 min−1, DmCBS 0.0015 min−1). These two proteins show fairly comparable behavior in the absolute rates of CO binding. In contrast, hCBS45 reacts more rapidly with CO at high pH (0.29 min−1) than hCBS and DmCBS, and the Fe(II)hCBS45-CO adduct is not stable at low pH. No effect of the order of addition of dithionite and CO is seen with any of the proteins, suggesting that the gas-binding step is rate-limiting.
The ligand-switched, thiolate-free forms Fe(II)DmCBS-424, Fe(II)hCBS-424 and Fe(II)hCBS45-424 bind CO gas at a very high rate, much faster than the Fe(II) forms that bear the native thiolate ligands. The 424 nm Soret of the ligand-switched species disappeared immediately after CO-saturated buffer was added, and the binding process was too fast to follow on a conventional spectrophotometer. The product CO adducts had identical electronic absorption spectra (data not shown) to the corresponding CO adducts formed from non-ligand switched, native thiolate-ligated Fe(II) species (Figure 5). Since the ligand-switching process for DmCBS did not go to completion, CO was added to a mixture of converted, Fe(II)DmCBS-424 (Soret 424 nm) and unconverted, Fe(II)DmCBS species (Soret 448 nm) (Figure 3). Immediately upon addition of CO, the 424 nm Soret disappeared with the appearance of a new peak at 414 nm. The remaining unconverted Fe(II)DmCBS (448 nm Soret) also bound CO to give the same product, but at a much slower rate. These observations strongly support the conclusion that it is the presence of the thiolate ligand that impedes CO binding in native, thiolate-coordinated CBS proteins.
The three proteins, DmCBS, hCBS, and hCBS45 reacted with NO to form similar, 5-coordinate heme-NO adducts. The same NO adducts were obtained regardless of whether the starting point was the Fe(III) or dithionite-generated Fe(II) species. The resulting NO adducts exhibit poorly resolved spectra with the Soret at 395–397 nm and a broad flat band in the α–β region (Table 2 and Figure 5). These spectra are indicative of a 5-coordinate heme with bearing a single NO axial ligand in each of the three proteins.
Discussion
There are several lines of evidence suggesting correlation between heme binding, AdoMet regulation, PLP affinity and enzyme activity in CBS. The yeast CBS enzyme does not contain heme and does not respond to AdoMet, while the human CBS does contain heme and is activated approximately 4-fold by AdoMet. Yeast CBS is always highly active, while hCBS reaches a high activity level only in the presence of heme and AdoMet. The hemeless Δ1-70 hCBS variant is not AdoMet-responsive, although this protein is active (with ~20% activity relative to the wild-type enzyme) and possesses an intact C-terminal regulatory region (16). These three pieces of evidence plausibly implicate correlation between the presence of heme and responsiveness to AdoMet. There is also evidence for a connection between heme and PLP affinity. The affinity of hCBS for the PLP coenzyme in vitro is higher than that of yeast CBS, and a variant human enzyme with the heme-binding N-terminal domain deleted exhibits a low affinity for PLP (14, 16). Further evidence points to a structural role for heme in maintaining enzyme activity. The heme in hCBS bears a cysteine thiolate ligand, which must remain bound for the enzyme to be active. Small molecules such as CO and NO bind to the hCBS heme, replacing the cysteine ligand, and the gas-bound forms of the enzyme are inactive (19, 42). The hCBS cysteine thiolate ligand can be replaced by another neutral ligand, or removed with HgCl2 and the resulting enzymes are inactive (17, 18, 21, 43). The Fe(III) in the heme can be replaced with Co(III) while retaining the His/Cys ligation and the resulting Co(III)hCBS enzyme has comparable activity to that of Fe(III)hCBS. Reduction of Co(III) to Co(II) induces loss of the cysteine ligand and loss of enzyme activity (17).
Other results are inconsistent with a correlation between heme, AdoMet, PLP and enzyme activity. AdoMet is known to interact with the C-terminal domain of hCBS (44); specifically, the CBS1 and CBS2 domains in the C-terminus are identified as the AdoMet binding sites (45, 46). When an hCBS fragment composed of residues 416−551 is expressed in E. coli, the pair of C-terminal CBS domains alone are sufficient to bind AdoMet (46), an observation inconsistent with a role for the heme in AdoMet binding. Furthermore, yeast CBS, which does not contain heme, binds AdoMet with very high affinity, yet the enzyme does not respond to AdoMet with a change in activity (13, 14). Given these inconsistencies, we chose to further explore the biochemical consequences of the heme in CBS through comparative studies of CBS proteins from human and fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster).
DmCBS contains heme but does not respond to AdoMet stimulation, suggesting that these two characteristics are not correlated with one another. DmCBS is isolated as a heme-containing protein; the crystal structure revealed that His34 and Cys22 are ligands to the heme, with Arg235 and Trp24 within hydrogen bonding distance of the Cys22 sulfur (23). This coordination sphere and associated hydrogen bonding network, as well as the spectral characteristics of Fe(III)DmCBS reported herein, are essentially identical to those of Fe(III)hCBS. DmCBS is active in all three reactions tested, but the enzyme does not respond to AdoMet stimulation in catalyzing any of these reactions. In this regard, DmCBS is more like yeast CBS, which also does not respond to AdoMet stimulation. The lack of response to AdoMet, combined with the fact that DmCBS contains heme, suggests that heme and AdoMet are not functionally or evolutionarily connected.
It seems likely that DmCBS does not bind AdoMet. There are multiple reasons why a CBS enzyme may appear unresponsive to AdoMet stimulation: it may be unable to bind AdoMet, it may be locked in a conformation that cannot be activated even though AdoMet binds, or it may have a high affinity for AdoMet such that AdoMet is always bound and it therefore does not respond to exogenous AdoMet. For example, the C431S variant of hCBS is not activated by AdoMet because it does not bind AdoMet (45). On the other hand, the hCBS S466L variant binds AdoMet, but because this variant enzyme is constitutively activated, its activity does not increase in response to AdoMet binding (41). Yeast CBS is similar to S466L hCBS, where constitutively high activity is paired with high AdoMet binding affinity but no AdoMet-dependent activation (13, 14). There is no example yet known of a CBS protein where AdoMet is tightly bound at all times. No evidence of AdoMet was seen in the DmCBS crystal structure (23); furthermore, when an AdoMet molecule was docked into the C-terminal domain of the protein, there was insufficient space to accommodate the guest molecule (23). Thus, DmCBS is not crystallized with a tightly bound AdoMet molecule and the crystallography implies that AdoMet may not bind at all. Our mass spectrometry experiment confirmed that DmCBS is isolated free of tightly-bound AdoMet. In addition, we see no evidence of AdoMet-binding when DmCBS is incubated with AdoMet. These results suggest that the high activity of DmCBS is an intrinsic property of the enzyme and not a consequence of the enzyme being saturated by AdoMet when isolated. The mass spectroscopy results suggest that DmCBS does not respond to AdoMet stimulation because the enzyme cannot bind AdoMet; however, we cannot rule out low affinity binding that does not survive the sample preparation procedures.
The CBS enzymes, yCBS, hCBS, hCBS45 and DmCBS, can utilize both serine and O-acetylserine as substrate to synthesize cysteine (Reactions 2 and 3), whereas cysteine synthase (CS) must use Oacetylserine (Reaction 3 only). CBS enzymes are approximately two orders of magnitude slower than CS enzymes, whose rates are on the order of 103–104 U/mg protein (47–58). Furthermore, a CBS-like protein BsMccA from Bacillus subtilis, catalyzes a cystathionine synthesis reaction analogous to the CBS canonical reaction (Reaction 1) using O-acetylserine and homocysteine (59). CBS and CS enzymes have very similar active site structures in the vicinity of the PLP coenzyme in both the resting state and the intermediate states; the structure of the mouth of the channel shows greater variability in size and shape (8, 23–26). Differences in the active site pocket and the channel through which the substrates get to this pocket may affect whether and how a certain substrate binds. The presence or absence of specific residues as general acid/base catalysts may also influence the reaction rate and substrate selectivity. Consistent with this model, multiple residues in the yCBS active site were shown influence kinetics of and specificity toward cystathionine synthesis and serine deamination (60) and active site variants of hCBS exhibit differential effects on cystathionine synthesis from serine and cysteine (61).
The CBS heme was postulated to be a gas sensor because the gas-bound enzyme is inactive (19, 62); however, the slow rate and complexity of the gas binding reactions suggest that such a role is less likely. When the heme iron is reduced, all three CBS proteins (hCBS, hCBS45 and DmCBS) bind CO and NO on time scales of hours. For comparison, the CO sensor CooA and NO sensor sGC, which undergo significant conformational changes in response to gas binding, react completely within minutes with CO and NO, respectively (63, 64). The gas binding process in CBS is pH-dependent; therefore, were the heme to function as a gas sensor, sensing would be coupled with pH. Among the hemoproteins that bind small molecule ligands for sensing or transport, few are known to exhibit pHsensitive ligand binding processes. Typically, in these pH-sensitive proteins the binding rate is faster at high pH (65–69). There are also cases reported where the ligand dissociation rate is faster at high pH (65, 69–73). The CBS proteins are distinct in that the apparent binding rate is faster at low pH and the rate decreases as the pH increases. Mechanistic considerations and kinetic analysis of CO binding suggest that the CO-Fe bond only forms after the cysteine thiolate ligand has departed; therefore, the binding rate is limited by the rate of thiolate dissociation. The departing thiolate ligand must be protonated, a process that is faster at low pH. This explanation is consistent with our observation that the apparent CO binding rate of ligand-switched CBS, in which the thiolate ligand is absent, is exceedingly fast. Although it is rare for the ligand binding rate to increase with decreased pH, CBS is not the only example. The rates of CO binding to neuroglobin and Nassa mutabilis myoglobin increase with decreasing pH due to protonation of histidine ligands that are replaced by CO (74, 75). Protonation of a heme propionate group is proposed to account for decreases in the binding rate with decreasing pH of Cl− to Tokunagayusurika akamusi hemoglobin (76) and CO to heme-H and heme-GH model complexes (77).
Previous studies suggested that the heme is critical for human CBS folding and assembly. Improper folding and degradation of hCBS enzyme are observed in heme-deficient expression systems (78) and addition of heme to heme-deficient CBS after expression cannot restore either the activity or the absorption spectrum (79). Expression of human CBS in heme biosynthesis-deficient systems can be rescued by addition of heme analogs or a chemical chaperone (78) resulting in normal enzyme activity and AdoMet-responsiveness (17). When a CBS-GST fusion protein was expressed in heme-biosynthesis-deficient E. coli cells, it was possible to isolate modest amounts of a heme-free fusion protein. This heme–free protein was deficient in PLP and exhibited 3% of the activity of the hemecontaining fusion protein (78). Together, these results support a proposed role for heme in establishing CBS structure (80, 81). While heme may be necessary for proper folding during expression, our results also indicate that the global stabilities of properly folded CBS enzymes (both human and Drosophila) are affected by changes at the heme. It is a phenomenological observation that disruption of the cysteine thiolate-to-iron bond correlates with complete loss of enzyme activity. In cases where it was shown that this bond was broken, no CBS activity was observed (17–19, 21, 42, 43). This observation suggests communication between the heme-binding domain and the catalytic PLP; however, the nature of this communication is not known. The results herein show that, just like human CBS, DmCBS loses activity once the cysteine thiolate ligand is removed from the heme, further strengthening the postulated correlation between heme and enzyme activity. It is possible that heme serves multiple roles: first in maintaining protein structure during translation and folding and then in regulating stability and activity in the mature protein.
Conclusion
We conclude that in human and Drosophila CBS, heme and AdoMet regulation are not correlated. Like yeast CBS, DmCBS is active both in the canonical cystathionine synthesis reaction and two alternative cysteine synthesis reactions and does not respond to AdoMet stimulation. At the same time, DmCBS is a heme protein, with spectroscopic characteristics similar to those of human CBS. Fe(II)DmCBS undergoes pH-mediated redox and thermal ligand switching, but the reduced heme in DmCBS is less stable than that in hCBS. CO binds slowly to Fe(II)DmCBS and to Fe(II)hCBS, with rates that vary with pH. In the CO adducts, the heme-cysteine thiolate bond is disrupted and the enzyme activity is lost. Based on these findings, we conclude that the incorporation of heme and AdoMet regulation in CBS are unrelated, and presumably emerged separately in the course of evolution.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the UW-Madison Human Proteomics Program funded by the Wisconsin partnership fund for a healthy future for support in obtaining mass spectrometry data.
This work was supported by N.I.H. grant HL-065217 to J.P.K and J.N.B, by American Heart Association Grant In-Aid 09GRNT2110159 to J.P.K and by Postdoctoral Fellowship 0920079G from the American Heart Association to T. M.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available
High resolution FT-IC MS analysis of as-isolated and AdoMet-treated DmCBS (Figure S1). Electronic absorption spectra of Fe(III) and Fe(II)DmCBS at pH 7.4 (Figure S2). Thermal denaturation of Fe(II)hCBS, Fe(III)DmCBS and Fe(II)DmCBS (Figure S3–S5). Mathematical derivation of the kinetic model for CBS CO-binding reaction. CO-binding process of DmCBS at pH 6.0 monitored by electronic absorption spectroscopy (Figure S6). Apparent rate constants for CO-binding reactions of hCBS, hCBS45 and DmCBS (Table S1). Supporting materials may be accessed free of charge online at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Mudd SH, Levy HL, Kraus JP. Disorders of transulfuration. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, editors. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 2007–2056. [Google Scholar]
- 2.McCully KS. Homocysteine and vascular disease. Nat. Med. 1996;2:386–389. doi: 10.1038/nm0496-386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.denHeijer M, Koster T, Blom HJ, Bos GMJ, Briet E, Reitsma PH, Vandenbroucke JP, Rosendaal FR. Hyperhomocysteinemia as a risk factor for deep-vein thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334:759–762. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603213341203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clarke R, Daly L, Robinson K, Naughten E, Cahalane S, Fowler B, Graham I. Homocysteinemia: A Risk Factor for Vascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:966–967. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104253241701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Finkelstein JD, Kyle WE, Martin JJ, Pick A-M. Activation of cystathionine synthase by adenosylmethionine and adenosylethionine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1975;66:81–87. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(75)80297-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kutzbach C, Stokstad ELR. Feedback inhibition of methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase in rat liver by S-adenosylmethionine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Enzymol. 1967;139:217–220. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(67)90140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roper MD, Kraus JP. Rat cystathionine β-synthase: Expression of four alternatively spliced isoforms in transfected cultured cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992;298:514–521. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90443-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meier M, Janosik M, Kery V, Kraus JP, Burkhard P. Structure of human cystathionine β-synthase: a unique pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent heme protein. EMBO J. 2001;20:3910–3916. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.15.3910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Taoka S, Lepore BW, Kabil O, Ojha S, Ringe D, Banerjee R. Human cystathionine β-Synthase is a heme sensor protein. Evidence that the redox sensor is heme and not the vicinal cysteines in the CXXC motif seen in the crystal structure of the truncated enzyme. Biochemistry. 2002;41:10454–10461. doi: 10.1021/bi026052d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alexander FW, Sandmeier E, Mehta PK, Christen P. Evolutionary relationships among pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enzymes. Regio-specific alpha, beta and gamma families. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;219:953–960. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grishin NV, Phillips MA, J GE. Modeling the spatial structure of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylases. Protein Sci. 1995;4:1291–1304. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Banerjee R, Evande R, Kabil Ö, Ojha S, Taoka S. Reaction mechanism and regulation of cystathionine β-synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2003;1647:30–35. doi: 10.1016/s1570-9639(03)00044-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jhee K-H, McPhie P, Miles EW. Yeast cystathionine β-synthase is a pyridoxal phosphate enzyme but, unlike the human enzyme, is not a heme protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:11541–11544. doi: 10.1074/jbc.c000056200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maclean KN, Janosik M, Oliveriusova J, Kery V, Kraus JP. Transsulfuration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not dependent on heme: purification and characterization of recombinant yeast cystathionine β-synthase. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000;81:161–171. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(00)00100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jhee K-H, McPhie P, Miles EW. Domain Architecture of the Heme-Independent Yeast Cystathionine β-Synthase Provides Insights into Mechanisms of Catalysis and Regulation. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10548–10556. doi: 10.1021/bi001020g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oliveriusová J, Kery Vr, Maclean KN, Kraus JP. Deletion Mutagenesis of Human Cystathionine β-Synthase - Impact on activity, oligomeric status, and S-adenosylmethionine regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:48386–48394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207087200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Smith AT, Majtan T, Freeman KM, Su Y, Kraus JP, Burstyn JN. Cobalt Cystathionine β-Synthase: A Cobalt-Substituted Heme Protein with a Unique Thiolate Ligation Motif. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50:4417–4427. doi: 10.1021/ic102586b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cherney MM, Pazicni S, Frank N, Marvin KA, Kraus JP, Burstyn JN. Ferrous Human Cystathionine β-Synthase Loses Activity during Enzyme Assay Due to a Ligand Switch Process. Biochemistry. 2007;46:13199–13210. doi: 10.1021/bi701159y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Taoka S, Banerjee R. Characterization of NO binding to human cystathionine β-synthase: possible implications of the effects of CO and NO binding to the human enzyme. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2001;87:245–251. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(01)00335-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shintani T, Iwabuchi T, Soga T, Kato Y, Yamamoto T, Takano N, Hishiki T, Ueno Y, Ikeda S, Sakuragawa T, Ishikawa K, Goda N, Kitagawa Y, Kajimura M, Matsumoto K, Suematsu M. Cystathionine β-synthase as a carbon monoxide–sensitive regulator of bile excretion. Hepatology. 2009;49:141–150. doi: 10.1002/hep.22604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Taoka S, Green EL, Loehr TM, Banerjee R. Mercuric chloride-induced spin or ligation state changes in ferric or ferrous human cystathionine β-synthase inhibit enzyme activity. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2001;87:253–259. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(01)00336-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Celano L, Gil M, Carballal S, Durán R, Denicola A, Banerjee R, Alvarez B. Inactivation of cystathionine β-synthase with peroxynitrite. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009;491:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Koutmos M, Kabil O, Smith JL, Banerjee R. Structural basis for substrate activation and regulation by cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) domains in cystathionine β-synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:20958–20963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011448107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chinthalapudi K, Kumar M, Kumar S, Jain S, Alam N, Gourinath S. Crystal structure of native O-acetyl-serine sulfhydrylase from Entamoeba histolytica and its complex with cysteine: Structural evidence for cysteine binding and lack of interactions with serine acetyl transferase. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2008;72:1222–1232. doi: 10.1002/prot.22013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burkhard P, Jagannatha Rao GS, Hohenester E, Schnackerz KD, Cook PF, Jansonius JN. Three-dimensional structure of O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase from Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;283:121–133. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Burkhard P, Tai C-H, Ristroph CM, Cook PF, Jansonius JN. Ligand binding induces a large conformational change in O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase from Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;291:941–953. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W116–W118. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frank N, Kent JO, Meier M, Kraus JP. Purification and characterization of the wild type and truncated human cystathionine β-synthase enzymes expressed in E. coli. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;470:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Majtan T, Freeman KM, Smith AT, Burstyn JN, Kraus JP. Purification and characterization of cystathionine β-synthase bearing a cobalt protoporphyrin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011;508:25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gaitonde MK. A spectrophotometric method for the direct determination of cysteine in the presence of other naturally occurring amino acids. Biochem. J. 1967;104:627–633. doi: 10.1042/bj1040627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Münchow V, Steudel R. The Decomposition of Aqueous Dithionite and its reactions with polythionates SnO62− (n = 3–5) studied by ion-pair chromatography. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1994;620:121–126. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Danehy JP, Zubritsky CW. Iodometric method for the determination of dithionite, bisulfite, and thiosulfate in the presence of each other and its use in following the decomposition of aqueous solutions of sodium dithionite. Anal. Chem. 1974;46:391–395. doi: 10.1021/ac60339a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P, et al. SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. 2001 http://www.scipy.org. [Google Scholar]
- 34.The UniProt Consortium. Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D71–D75. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2 — a Multiple Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schrodinger LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Version 1.3r1. 2010 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pazicni S, Lukat-Rodgers GS, Oliveriusova J, Rees KA, Parks RB, Clark RW, Rodgers KR, Kraus JP, Burstyn JN. The redox behavior of the heme in cystathionine β-synthase is sensitive to pH. Biochemistry. 2004;43:14684–14695. doi: 10.1021/bi0488496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pazicni S, Cherney MM, Lukat-Rodgers GS, Oliveriusova J, Rodgers KR, Kraus JP, Burstyn JN. The heme of cystathionine β-synthase likely undergoes a thermally induced redox-mediated ligand swtich. Biochemistry. 2005;44:16785–16795. doi: 10.1021/bi051305z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Janosik M, Kery V, Gaustadnes M, Maclean KN, Kraus JP. Regulation of Human Cystathionine β-Synthase by S-Adenosyl-L-methionine: Evidence for Two Catalytically Active Conformations Involving an Autoinhibitory Domain in the C-Terminal Region. Biochemistry. 2001;40:10625–10633. doi: 10.1021/bi010711p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Taoka S, West M, Banerjee R. Characterization of the heme and pyridoxal phosphate cofactors of human cystathionine β-synthase reveals nonequivalent active sites. Biochemistry. 1999;38:2738–2744. doi: 10.1021/bi9826052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Singh S, Madzelan P, Stasser J, Weeks CL, Becker D, Spiro TG, Penner-Hahn J, Banerjee R. Modulation of the heme electronic structure and cystathionine β-synthase activity by second coordination sphere ligands: The role of heme ligand switching in redox regulation. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009;103:689–697. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sen S, Yu J, Yamanishi M, Schellhorn D, Banerjee R. Mapping Peptides Correlated with Transmission of Intrasteric Inhibition and Allosteric Activation in Human Cystathionine β-Synthase. Biochemistry. 2005;44:14210–14216. doi: 10.1021/bi051046d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Frank N, Kery V, Maclean KN, Kraus JP. Solvent-Accessible Cysteines in Human Cystathionine β-Synthase: Crucial Role of Cysteine 431 in S-Adenosyl-L-methionine Binding. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11021–11029. doi: 10.1021/bi060737m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Scott JW, Hawley SA, Green KA, Anis M, Stewart G, Scullion GA, Norman DG, Hardie DG. CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J. Clin. Investig. 2004;113:274–284. doi: 10.1172/JCI19874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Borup B, Ferry JG. O-Acetylserine Sulfhydrylase from Methanosarcina thermophila. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:45–50. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.1.45-50.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Droux M, Martin J, Sajus P, Douce R. Purification and characterization of O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase from spinach chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992;295:379–390. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90531-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ikegami F, Kaneko M, Kamiyama H, Murakoshi I. Purification and characterization of cysteine synthases from Citrullus vulgaris. Phytochemistry. 1988;27:697–701. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kredich NM, Becker MA, Herbert Tabor CWT. Methods Enzymol. Academic Press; 1971. Cysteine biosynthesis: Serine transacetylase and O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase (Salmonella typhimurium) pp. 459–470. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kuske CR, Ticknor LO, Guzmán E, Gurley LR, Valdez JG, Thompson ME, Jackson PJ. Purification and characterization of O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase isoenzymes from Datura innoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:6223–6232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mino K, Ishikawa K. Characterization of a Novel Thermostable O-Acetylserine Sulfhydrylase from Aeropyrum pernix K1. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:2277–2284. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2277-2284.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nagasawa T, Yamada H, William B, Jakoby OWG. Methods Enzymol. Academic Press; 1987. O-Acetylserine sulfhydrylase from Bacillus sphaericus; pp. 474–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nakamura T, Iwahashi H, Eguchi Y. Enzymatic proof for the identity of the S-sulfocysteine synthase and cysteine synthase B of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 1984;158:1122–1127. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.3.1122-1127.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sugihara Y, Yamagata S, Mizuno Y, Ezaki T. Characterization of O-Acetyl-L-serine Sulfhydrylase Purified from an Alkaliphilic Bacterium. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000;64:2352–2359. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yamagata S, Takeshima K. O-Acetylserine and O-Acetylhomoserine Sulfhydrylase of Yeast Further Purification and Characterization as a Pyridoxal Enzyme. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1976;80:777–785. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yamaguchi T, Masada M. Comparative studies on cysteine synthase isozymes from spinach leaves. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1995;1251:91–98. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(95)00085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yamaguchi T, Zhu X, Masada M. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Cysteine Synthase Isozyme from Spinach Hydrated Seeds. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998;62:501–507. doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hullo M-F, Auger S, Soutourina O, Barzu O, Yvon M, Danchin A, Martin-Verstraete I. Conversion of Methionine to Cysteine in Bacillus subtilis and Its Regulation. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:187–197. doi: 10.1128/JB.01273-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lodha PH, Shadnia H, Woodhouse CM, Wright JS, Aitken SM. Investigation of residues Lys112, Glu136, His138, Gly247, Tyr248, and Asp249 in the active site of yeast cystathionine β-synthase. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009;87:531–540. doi: 10.1139/o09-003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ozaki S-i, Sakaguchi C, Nakahara A, Yoshiya M. Mutagenesis Studies of Human Cystathionine β-Synthase: Residues Important for Heme Binding and Substrate Interactions. Protein Pept. Lett. 2010;17:351–355. doi: 10.2174/092986610790780233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Puranik M, Weeks CL, Lahaye D, Kabil Ö, Taoka S, Nielsen SB, Groves JT, Banerjee R, Spiro TG. Dynamics of Carbon Monoxide Binding to Cystathionine β-Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:13433–13438. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600246200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Puranik M, Nielsen SB, Youn H, Hvitved AN, Bourassa JL, Case MA, Tengroth C, Balakrishnan G, Thorsteinsson MV, Groves JT, McLendon GL, Roberts GP, Olson JS, Spiro TG. Dynamics of carbon monoxide binding to CooA. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:21096–21108. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400613200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhao Y, Brandish PE, Ballou DP, Marletta MA. A molecular basis for nitric oxide sensing by soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:14753–14758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fago A, Romano M, Tamburrini M, Coletta M, D'Avinno R, Prisco G. A polymerising Root-effect fish hemoglobin with high subunit heterogeneity. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993;218:829–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Murphy EJ, Maréchal A, Segal AW, Rich PR. CO Binding and Ligand Discrimination in Human Myeloperoxidase. Biochemistry. 2010;49:2150–2158. doi: 10.1021/bi9021507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ciaccio C, De Sanctis G, Marini S, Sinibaldi F, Santucci R, Arcovito A, Bellelli A, Ghibaudi E, Ferrari Rosa P, Coletta M. Proton Linkage for CO Binding and Redox Properties of Bovine Lactoperoxidase. Biophys. J. 2004;86:448–454. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bidwai AK, Ok EY, Erman JE. pH Dependence of Cyanide Binding to the Ferric Heme Domain of the Direct Oxygen Sensor from Escherichia coli and the Effect of Alkaline Denaturation†. Biochemistry. 2008;47:10458–10470. doi: 10.1021/bi800872d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kwiatkowski LD, Hui HL, Wierzba A, Noble RW, Walder RY, Peterson ES, Sligar SG, Sanders KE. Preparation and Kinetic Characterization of a Series of βW37 Variants of Human Hemoglobin A:.. Evidence for High-Affinity T Quaternary Structures. Biochemistry. 1998;37:4325–4335. doi: 10.1021/bi970866q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hargrove MS, Barry JK, Brucker EA, Berry MB, Phillips GN, Olson JS, Arredondo-Peter R, Dean JM, Klucas RV, Sarath G. Characterization of recombinant soybean leghemoglobin a and apolar distal histidine mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 1997;266:1032–1042. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kaneko Y, Yuda M, Iio T, Murase T, Chinzei Y. Kinetic analysis on nitric oxide binding of recombinant Prolixin-S, a nitric oxide transport protein from the bloodsucking bug, Rhodnius prolixus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1999;1431:492–499. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(99)00082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Andersen JF, Ding XD, Balfour C, Shokhireva TK, Champagne DE, Walker FA, Montfort WR. Kinetics and Equilibria in Ligand Binding by Nitrophorins 1.4:.. Evidence for Stabilization of a Nitric Oxide.Ferriheme Complex through a Ligand-Induced Conformational Trap. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10118–10131. doi: 10.1021/bi000766b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Swails JM, Meng Y, Walker FA, Marti MA, Estrin DA, Roitberg AE. pH-Dependent Mechanism of Nitric Oxide Release in Nitrophorins 2 and 4. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:1192–1201. doi: 10.1021/jp806906x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fago A, Mathews AJ, Dewilde S, Moens L, Brittain T. The reactions of neuroglobin with CO: Evidence for two forms of the ferrous protein. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006;100:1339–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Coletta M, Ascenzi P, Smulevich G, Mantini AR, Gaudio RD, Piscopo M, Geraci G. Alteration of the proximal bond energy in the unliganded form of the homodimeric myoglobin from Nassa mutabilis Kinetic and spectroscopic evidence. FEBS Lett. 1992;296:184–186. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80375-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yamamoto Y, Koshikawa K, Terui N, Mita H, Matsuoka A, Shikama K. 1H-NMR study of dynamics and thermodynamics of Cl- binding to ferric hemoglobin of a midge larva (Tokunagayusurika akamusi) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2003;1652:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.De Sanctis G, Fasciglione G, Marini S, Sinibaldi F, Santucci R, Monzani E, Dallacosta C, Casella L, Coletta M. pH-dependent redox and CO binding properties of chelated protoheme-l-histidine and protoheme-glycyl-l-histidine complexes. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11:153–167. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0060-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Majtan T, Singh LR, Wang L, Kruger WD, Kraus JP. Active Cystathionine β-Synthase Can Be Expressed in Heme-free Systems in the Presence of Metal-substituted Porphyrins or a Chemical Chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:34588–34595. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805928200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kery V, Bukovska G, Kraus JP. Transsulfuration depends on heme in addition to pyridoxal 5'-phosphate. Cystathionine β-synthase is a heme protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:25283–25288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Janosik M, Oliveriusova J, Janosikova B, Sokolova J, Kraus E, Kraus JP, Kozich V. Impaired heme binding and aggregation of mutant cystathionine β-synthase subunits in homocystinuria. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001;68:1506–1513. doi: 10.1086/320597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kery V, Elleder D, Kraus JP. D-Aminolevulinate increases heme saturation and yield of human cystathionine β-synthase expressed in Escherichia coli. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1995;316:24–29. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






