Skip to main content
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease logoLink to American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease
. 2013 Aug 16;3(3):170–174.

Risk factor assessment of young patients with acute myocardial infarction

Gohar Jamil 1, Mujgan Jamil 2, Hind AlKhazraji 2, Amber Haque 4, Fares Chedid 3, Manjula Balasubramanian 1, Bahaa Khairallah 1, Anwer Qureshi 1
PMCID: PMC3751683  PMID: 23991352

Abstract

The Middle East represents an attractive area for young individuals to seek employment, where they are exposed to numerous environmental conditions. The pursuit of a better standard of living has driven hundreds to the Middle East over the recent decades. This influx has also resulted in a predisposition to premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the risk factors in patients younger than 45 years, presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Out of the 148 patients analyzed, 137 were males and 11 females. 119 were from South Asia and 29 were Arabs. Their mean age was 36 ± 4.2 years. Smoking was the most prevalent risk factor in both groups at 67.6%. This was followed by hypertension, family history of CAD, hyperlipidemia and Diabetes mellitus. There was no significant difference in the clinical risk factor profile between these two groups. ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was noted in 67.6%, while 32.4% patients suffered a Non ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). 84.5% received coronary stents, 8.8% had lone thrombus aspiration or balloon angioplasty only, while the rest were treated by conservative medical management or referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the CAD risk profile between young South Asian and Arab patients. Preventive strategies focused on risk factor reduction, especially smoking cessation, should be implemented to protect young adults in the most productive years of their life.

Keywords: Young patients, acute myocardial infarction, smoking

Introduction

CAD is the leading cause of death in the western world [1,2]. Advancing age is a well-recognized risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Studies show a 2 to 10% incidence of AMI in patients age 45 years or younger [3-7,10]. Compared to older patients the reported incidence of MI is 8 times lower in younger population. The protection offered by young age is slowly being taken away by increased prevalence of risk factors for CHD in the adolescents [9]. In search of livelihood the Middle East attracts young people from all over the globe. Different socio-economic and environmental conditions may predispose them to increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Ignorance of CAD and false sense of security attributable to young age prevents them from seeking medical advice. Rather than stable or worsening angina, as seen in older patients, the first onset of angina rapidly progresses to fully evolved myocardial infarction (MI) in young patients. The vast majority of young patients deny history of chest pain prior to MI. It is clear that the prevalence is bound to increase. Early recognition and risk factor modification in this population sub-set is of key importance. These patients have different risk profile, presentation, and prognosis. The lack of published literature in young immigrant population regarding CAD is the basis for our review. This information will help guide physicians for better identifying and targeting primary and secondary preventative therapies.

Materials and methods

173 patients younger than 45 years of age had cardiac catheterization at Tawam hospital over a two-year period. Only patients from South Asian and Arab origin and with angiographically proven coronary artery disease were included in our study. Medical records were analyzed for the patient’s CAD risk factor profile i.e. history of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history and smoking. Details of the coronary angiogram, laboratory investigations, and metabolic and cardiac biomarkers were reviewed.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics and laboratory investigations are shown in Table 1. The Median age was 36.4 ± SD of 4.2 years. 92.6% were male patients, 7.4% female. 80.4% patients were South Asian, while 19.6% were Arabs. 48% of the Arabs were Emiratis. 67.6% of the whole group was smokers, 29.7% had hypertension, and 23.9% had family history of coronary artery disease. Hyperlipidemia was noted in 22.3% and diabetes in 20.9% of patients. The average Body mass Index of the group was 30.39 kg/m2.The majority of patients had STEMI, accounting for 67.6% of the total, while the rest 32.4% suffered from NSTEMI.

Table 1.

Clinical Variables

Asian N = 119 Arab N = 29 All patients N = 148
Age: Mean (SD) 36.3 (4.3 SD) 35.2 (4.4 SD) 36.04 (4.2 SD)
Gender: n (%)
  Male 137 (92.6)
  Female 11 (7.4%)
Male/Female 111/8 26/3 137/11 (92.6/7.4%)
Female 8 3 11 (7.4%)
STEMI 81 (68.1%) 19 (65.5%) 100 (67.6%)
NSTEMI 38 (31.9%) 10 (34.5%) 48 (32.4%)
Diabetes 27 (22.7%) 4 (13.8%) 31 (20.9%)
Hypertension 36 (30.3%) 8 (27.6%) 44 (29.7%)
Hyperlipidemia 22 (18.5%) 11 (37.9%) 33 (22.3%)
Smoking 80 (67.2%) 16 (57.1%) 96 (67.6%)
Family history 27 (23.5%) 7 (25.9%) 34 (23.9%)
Body Mass Index 30.29 (8.48 SD) 32.08 (8.98 SD) 30.93 (8.36 SD)

Clinical variables are summarized in Table 1. The laboratory results are shown in Table 2. The mean complete blood count, kidney function tests were normal, with a slightly elevated lipid profile. Peak CPK and Troponin I was elevated due to the myocardial infarction.

Table 2.

Laboratory Results

Mean (Standard Deviation)
Hemoglobin 14.43 (1.22)
Platelets 295.86 (86.12)
Creatinine 71.36 (12.59)
Urea 3.86 (1.51)
Total Cholesterol 4.79 (1.7)
LDL Cholesterol 3.14 (1.51)
Triglycerides 2.21 (1.57)
Peak CPK 1526.71 (2201)
Peak CPK-MB 172.71 (256.36)
Peak Troponin I 53.14 (87.23)

Table 3 shows the vessel involved and type of treatment received. Single vessel disease was noted in 85.1% of the patients, two vessels in 11.5% and three-vessel disease was seen in 3.4% patients. The Left anterior descending artery was the most common single vessel involved at 48% followed the right coronary involved 18.2% of the time and Left circumflex artery 17.6%. 42.6% patient’s received drug eluting stents, 41.9% received bare metal stents, and while 8.8% had either lone thrombus aspiration or balloon angioplasty only. Conservative medical management and coronary artery bypass surgery was recommended for 4.1% and 2.7% patients respectively.

Table 3.

Vessel Involved and treatment

Asian N = 119 Arab N = 29 All patients N = 148
Left Anterior Descending 57 (47.9%) 14 (48.3%) 71 (48%)
Right Coronary Artery 23 (19.3%) 4 (13.8%) 27 (18.2%)
Left Circumflex 19 (16%) 7 (24.1%) 26 (17.6 %)
Left Main 2 (1.7%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.4%)
2 Vessel 13 (9.9%) 4 (13.8%) 17 (14.9%)
Three Vessel 5 (4.2%) 0 (0%) 5 (3.4%)
DES 42 (35.3%) 21 (72.4%) 63 (42.6%)
BMS 55 (46.2%) 7 (24.1%) 62 (41.9%)
Thrombus aspiration only 12 (10.1%) 0 (0%) 12 (8.1%)
Medical management 5 (4.2%) 1 (3.4%) 6 (4.1%)
Coronary artery bypass surgery 4 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 4 (2.7%)
Balloon angioplasty only 1 (0.8%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%)

Discussion

Studies have shown substantial differences in risk factors, management and outcomes of myocardial infarction among young and old patients [10]. Compared to healthy, age matched control subjects, young patients with myocardial infarction have a higher percentage of smoking, and other coronary artery disease risk factors [11-14]. This has not been yet addressed in the young immigrant population of UAE.

Stable angina and multivessel disease is uncommon in the young [15]. The first onset of angina in the young rapidly progresses to fully evolved MI [16]. Up to one third of the young patients deny history of chest pain prior to MI [17]. In Contrast, older patients usually have multivessel disease [12,18-23]. The Long-term prognosis of patients depends upon the number of diseased vessels, and the degree of LV dysfunction [24-26]. Our study was in line, showing the majority having first episode of acute coronary syndrome without prior symptoms and 85% had single vessel disease. The lack of warning signs stresses the need for primary preventative measures. Contradictory data exists in literature regarding the frequency of coronary artery involved in AMI in young individuals [18,19,27-29]. Our study shows the left anterior descending to be involved 48% of time, followed by and equal RCA and LCx involvement at approximately 18%.

Smoking is traditionally recognized as the most common risk factor for heart disease and is associated with MI at young age [20,29]. In patients with PCI proven CHD the prevalence of smoking is higher among patients younger than age 45 compared to over 60 (58.7 vs. 43%) [30]. History of smoking is has been reported in 73% to 90% of young patients with MI [11-13,19-21,28,29]. The high incidence of smoking noted in our patients was 68%. It was equally high in the South Asian and Arab patients. Our data and others [32] support the need of promoting smoking prevention programs in the young population.

Oral contraceptives in combination with smoking have been associated with MI in young women [33,34]. Fortunately compared to the west, where smoking in girls has been shown to be more prevalent and persistent (they smoker for longer time) reaching up to 9% [35], there was no history of cigarette smoking in our female patients.

Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance is found in two thirds of the young patients with MI [36]. Obesity is on the rise worldwide with a threefold increase in UK in the past two decades [35,37,38]. Lipid abnormalities, insulin resistance and obesity are more common in patients with family history of premature CHD [39]. Our patient population somewhat differs, many of these young people are physically active by virtue of their professions of being manual laborers. The average BMI at 30.1 kg/m2 does not seem to be the major contributing factor to the MI. In patients with known CAD, studies have shown an inconsistent incidence of hyperlipidemia and hyper-triglyceridemia in young vs. older patients [20,21,31,34,40]. Our study showed 30% patients were hypertensive, 22% had hyperlipidemia and 21% were diabetics.

Compared to normal subjects, family history of cad is prevalent patients with known CAD [20,31]. This finding is inconsistent, as other studies do not find the same association [12,19]. In a study by Zimmerman et al, family history of CAD was more common only in young men [40], while in young patients with MI, positive family history of premature coronary artery disease was found in 39% participants [15]. Family history of cad was noted in 24% of our patient population. This is somewhat equal to generally found in normal population.

Conclusion

MI at youthful (early) age raises the disconcerting/alarming/disturbing potential of malignant atherosclerosis disease and subsequent adverse prognosis. It has devastating effects on patients, their families and community at large. Risk factor modification is a challenging task in young patients. A particular challenge that remains for the health care worker is the high/alarming incidence of smoking noted in our young patients. Smoking is traditionally recognized as the most common risk factor for heart disease. Preventive educational programs along side with smoking cessation clinics need to be established. Smoking cessation, diabetic and cholesterol education should be a priority of the medical community. If not treated appropriately, long-term mortality may reach 30%. The limitation for the current study is that this is a retrospective study.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Department of Health. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. 2000 http://www.doh.gov.uk/publications.
  • 2.Office of National Statistics. Indicators of the nation’s health—ischemic heart disease: male and female death rates by special causes. 2002 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/mortality.
  • 3.Lamm G. The epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in young age groups. In: Roskamm H, editor. Myocardial infarction at young age. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1981. pp. 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zimmerman FH, Cameron A, Fisher LD, Ng G. Myocardial infarction in young adults: angiographic characterization, risk factors and prognosis (Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registry) J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:654–661. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00254-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choudhury L, Marsh JD. Myocardial infarction in young patients. Am J Med. 1999;107:254–261. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Füllhaas JU, Rickenbacher P, Pfisterer M, Ritz R. Long-term prognosis of young patients after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Clin Cardiol. 1997;20:993–998. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960201204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pfeffer MA, McMurray J, Leizorovicz A, Maggioni AP, Rouleau JL, Van De Werf F, Henis M, Neuhart E, Gallo P, Edwards S, Sellers MA, Velazquez E, Califf R for the VALIANT investigators. Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial [VALIANT] : rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2000;140:727–750. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.108832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choudhry L, Marsh JD. Myocardial infarction in young patients. Am J Med. 1999;107:254–261. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, Tamborlane WV, Banyas B, Allen K, Savoye M, Rieger V, Taksali S, Barbetta G, Sherwin RS, Caprio S. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:802–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morillas P, Bertomeu V, Pabón P, Ancillo P, Bermejo J, Fernández C, Arós F PRIAMHO II Investigators. Characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in young patients. The PRIAMHO II study. Cardiology. 2007;107:217–25. doi: 10.1159/000095421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moret P, Gutzwiller F, Junod B. Coronary artery disease in young adults under 35 years old: risk factors. pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gohlke H, Sturzenhofecker P, Thilo A, Droste C, Gornandt L, Roskamm H. Coronary angiographic findings and risk factors in postinfarction patients under the age of 40. pp. 61–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nussel E, Buchholz L, Scheidt R. Myocardial infarction in young men in the Heidelberg register area. pp. 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Walker WJ, Gregoratos G. Myocardial infarction in young men. Am J Cardiol. 1967;19:339–343. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90445-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen L, Chester M, Kaski JC. Clinical factors and angiographic features associated with premature coronary artery disease. Chest. 1995;108:364. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gaeta G, De Michele M, Cuomo S, Guarini P, Foglia MC, Bond MG, Trevisan M. Arterial abnormalities in the offspring of patients with premature myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:840–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009213431203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Butler R, Webster MW, Davies G, Kerr A, Bass N, Armstrong G, Stewart JT, Ruygrok P, Ormiston J. Spontaneous dissection of native coronary arteries. Heart. 2005;91:223–4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.014423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Burkart F, Salzmann C. Angiographic findings in postinfarction patients under the age of 35. pp. 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wolfe MW, Vacek JL. Myocardial infarction in the young. Chest. 1988;94:926–930. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.5.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hoit BD, Gilpin EA, Henning H, Maisel AA, Dittrich H, Carlisle J, Ross J Jr. Myocardial infarction in young patients: an analysis by age subsets. Circulation. 1986;74:712–721. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.4.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sheldon WC, Razavi M, Lim YJ. Coronary arteriographic findings in younger survivors of acute myocardial infarction including those with normal coronary arteries. pp. 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Virmani R, McAllister HA. Myocardial infarction in patients under the age of 40: autopsy findings. pp. 92–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roubin GS, Harris PJ, Bernstein L, Kelly DT. Coronary anatomy and prognosis after myocardial infarction in patients 60 years of age and younger prognosis after myocardial infarction in patients 60 years of age and younger. Circulation. 1983;67:743–749. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.4.743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cole JH, Miller JI 3rd, Sperling LS, Weintraub WS. Long-term follow-up of coronary artery disease presenting in young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:521–8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02862-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moccetti T, Malacrida R, Pasotti E, Sessa F, Genoni M, Barlera S, Turazza F, Maggioni AP. Epidemiologic variables and outcome of 1972 young patients with acute myocardial infarction. Data from GISSI-2 database. Investigators of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvienza nell’Infarto Miocardico [GISSI-2] . Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Porter A, Wurzel M, Ben-Gal T, Sulkes J, Sagie A. Long term prognosis of 210 patients who underwent coronary angiography before 40 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:1168. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00087-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Davia JE, Hallal FJ, Cheitlin MD, Gregoratos G, McCarty R, Foote W. Coronary artery disease in young patients: arteriographic and clinical review of 40 cases aged 35 and under. Am Heart J. 1974;87:689–696. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(74)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roth O, Berki A, Wolff GD. Long range observations in fifty-three young patients with myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1967;19:331–338. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90444-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kennelly BM. Etiology and risk factors in young patients with recent acute myocardial infarction. S Afr Med J. 1982;61:503–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mukherjee D, Hsu A, Moliterno DJ, Lincoff AM, Goormastic M, Topol EJ. Risk factors for premature coronary artery disease and determinants of adverse outcomes after revascularization in patients less than 40 years old. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1465–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uhl GS, Farrel PW. Myocardial infarction at young age: risk factors and natural history. pp. 29–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Salem BI, Haikal M, Zambrano A, Bollis A, Gowda S. Acute myocardial infarction with “normal” coronary arteries: clinical and angiographic profiles, with ergonovine testing. Tex Heart Inst J. 1985;12:1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Waters DD, Halphen C, Theroux P, Paul-Robert D, Mizgala HF. Coronary artery disease in young women: clinical and angiographic features and correlation with risk factors. Am J Cardiol. 1978 Jul;42:41–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90982-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Engel HJ, Engel E, Lichtlen PR. Acute myocardial infarction in young women: evidence for spontaneous lysis of a coronary thrombus. pp. 122–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.British Heart Foundation. 2003. BHF coronary heart disease statistics. http://www.bhf.org.uk/professionals/statistics. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Curren PJ, Chung EH, Chauhan MS. Metabolic syndrome: an under recognized risk factor for myocardial infarction in the young. [Abstract] . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:24. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ebbeling CB. Pawlak BB. Ludwig DS. Lancet. 2002;360:473–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09678-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horton R. Who pays in the obesity war? Lancet. 2003;363:339. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15469-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP 3rd, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults: the Bogalusa heart study. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1650–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806043382302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zimmerman FH, Cameron A, Fisher LD, Ng G. Myocardial infarction in young adults: angiographic characterisation, risk factors and prognosis (Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registry) J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:654–661. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00254-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES