Skip to main content
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2013 Jun 5;88(6):1163–1169. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0603

Photochemical Inactivation of Chikungunya Virus in Human Apheresis Platelet Components by Amotosalen and UVA Light

Konstantin A Tsetsarkin 1, Adam Sampson-Johannes 1, Lynette Sawyer 1, John Kinsey 1, Stephen Higgs 1, Dana L Vanlandingham 1,*
PMCID: PMC3752818  PMID: 23530077

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne alphavirus that recently re-emerged in Africa and rapidly spread into countries of the Indian Ocean basin and South-East Asia. The mean viremic blood donation risk for CHIKV on La Réunion reached 1.5% at the height of the 2005–2006 outbreaks, highlighting the need for development of safety measures to prevent transfusion-transmitted infections. We describe successful inactivation of CHIKV in human platelets and plasma using photochemical treatment with amotosalen and long wavelength UVA illumination. Platelet components in additive solution and plasma units were inoculated with two different strains of high titer CHIKV stock (6.0–8.0 logs/mL), and then treated with amotosalen and exposure to 1.0–3.0 J/cm2 UVA. Based on in vitro assays of infectious virus pre- and post-treatment to identify endpoint dilutions where virus was not detectable, mean viral titers could effectively be reduced by > 6.4 ± 0.6 log10 TCID50/mL in platelets and ≥ 7.6 ± 1.4 logs in plasma, indicating this treatment has the capacity to prevent CHIKV transmission in human blood components collected from infected donors in or traveling from areas of CHIKV transmission.

Introduction

Emergence/re-emergence of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) in new geographic ranges poses a considerable challenge for transfusion medicine worldwide. Highlighted by the West Nile virus (WNV) epidemics in North America, dengue virus (DENV) epidemics in Puerto Rico, Brazil, and Honduras, and the establishment of DENV transmissions in Florida, arboviruses are now considered as “significant transfusion-transmissible pathogens.”1 The 2012 WNV data for the United States include over 240 presumptive viremic blood donors—already exceeding the total of 137 for 20112; although both WNV and DENV are members of the Flaviviridae, chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is in the Alphavirus genus of the family Togaviridae. Beginning in 2004, an epidemic of CHIKV emerged in coastal areas of East Africa3,4 and rapidly spread into countries of the Indian Ocean basin,59 South-East Asia,1013 India,14 China,15 and Europe.1618 The total number of CHIKV infections remains undetermined, although in India alone it has been estimated that it has recently caused between 2 and 6.5 million cases of arthritic disease.19 In addition, fatalities were repeatedly documented in association with CHIKV infection, although involvement of underlying medical conditions or coinfections with other pathogens in fatal cases could not be disregarded.2025 There are no antivirals or licensed vaccines available to control CHIKV outbreaks.

Enzootic in tropical regions of Africa, CHIKV relies on transmission between non-human primates and sylvatic, primatophilic mosquitoes (Aedes furcifer-taylori, Aedes africanus, Aedes luteocephalus, and Aedes neoafricanus).26,27 Occasional spillovers result in CHIKV introduction into rural areas causing outbreaks transmitted by highly anthropophilic Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. The CHIKV is also endemic in South-East Asia where it is maintained in a strictly urban cycle involving Ae. aegypti and most recently, Ae. albopictus.26 The genetic adaptation of CHIKV to transmission by Ae. albopictus was postulated as one of the major factors that contributed to the magnitude and geographic dispersal of the recent CHIKV epidemics.28,29 Aedes albopictus is now present on all continents except Antarctica and continues to expand its range,30 posing the threat of introduction and possible establishment of CHIKV in new geographic areas including the Americas. The CHIKV outbreaks in Northern Italy in 2007 and France in 201016–18 underscore the plausibility of future expansion of CHIKV.

Although CHIKV infection by transfusion of donated blood products has not been documented, the explosive global CHIKV expansion in recent years warrants a considerable revision of blood management systems in affected regions.1 Thus, during the Italian CHIKV outbreak of 2007 and the 2005–2006 epidemic in the French island La Réunion, all blood collections were suspended,3133 and the required blood was delivered from unaffected regions of Italy or continental France. However, the 5-day shelf life of platelet components precluded their being delivered to La Réunion from France and pathogen inactivation was instituted on an emergency basis to provide safe platelets for patients there.32 The relatively short duration of the viremic period (6–7 days) and low rates of asymptomatic infections (3% to 25%)3436 have been proposed as factors that decrease the risk of contamination of donated blood with CHIKV.1 However, the extremely high attack rates observed during CHIKV epidemics (34–75%) probably equalize these factors, resulting in an overall increase in the transfusion risk of CHIKV.3,5,37 Using mathematical models, it was estimated that during the 2005–2006 outbreak in La Réunion, the mean viremic blood donation risk was 0.132% and reached 1.5% at the height of the outbreak.33 Analysis of donated platelets for the presence of CHIKV RNA in Italy revealed a 0.4% contamination rate, which is in agreement with the mathematical model prediction (0.7%).31

The photochemical treatment of therapeutic units of human platelet and plasma components using amotosalen, a synthetic psoralen, and UVA (320–400 nm; INTERCEPT Blood System [IBS]; Cerus Corporation, Concord, CA) is a highly efficient method for inactivation of a broad variety of blood borne pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and leukocytes.3846 The inactivation technology is based on the ability of psoralens to intercalate into double-stranded forms of RNA or DNA, or hairpins of single-stranded RNA or DNA. Treatment of the resultant complexes with UVA illumination leads to the formation of inter- and cross-strand links between pyrimidine bases, which prevents pathogen replication and transcription.47 In vitro studies have shown that photochemical treatment with amotosalen and UVA does not substantially affect platelet or plasma function40,41,48,49 and clinical trials indicated that transfusion of psoralen-treated platelets or plasma to patients does not result in adverse immunologic or hemorrhagic responses.5053 More than a million kits to prepare IBS platelets and plasma have been sold since the introduction of the system in Europe. Detailed haemovigilance and post marketing surveillance in Europe since 2003 continues to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the treated products.5458

Although high levels of inactivation have been demonstrated for a number of viruses including single-stranded RNA viruses,38,40 the efficacy of amotosalen and UVA treatment of inactivation of high CHIKV doses had not been tested. Here, we describe the successful inactivation of high doses of CHIKV in apheresis platelet concentrates and plasma components using the amotosalen and UVA treatment process.

Materials and Methods

CHIKV strain LR2006 OPY1 (GenBank accession no.: DQ443544.2), was obtained from the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses (WRCEVA) at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. The strain was originally isolated in 2006 from a febrile patient who returned to France from La Réunion. The strain was passed five times on Vero cell culture and once in suckling mice. The stock virus was prepared by infecting confluent monolayers of Vero76 cells (obtained from ATCC, Rockville, MD) in 150 cm2 flasks. Virus was propagated in Vero cells at 37°C in Liebovitz's L-15 medium (1X L-15, 10% fetal bovine serum, 10% tryptose phosphate broth, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM L-Glutamine), harvested at 3 days post infection, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C. The CHIKV strain S27 was obtained from the ATCC and was propagated in Vero76 cells as described previously, using Earle's Minimal Essential Medium (EE) in place of L-15. This strain was originally isolated from patient serum in Tanganyika, East Africa in 1953. The use of two different strains isolated decades apart shows that viruses containing different mutations accumulated over time are equally sensitive to the inactivation protocol presented here.

Apheresis platelet concentrates, collected with the Amicus cell separator (Fenwal Inc., Lake Zurich, IL) from randomly selected routine donors, were suspended in ∼110 mL autologous plasma and 180 mL of InterSol platelet additive solution (NaAcetate·3H2O, 4.42 g/L; Na3Citrate·2 H2O, 3.18 g/L; NaH2PO4·2H2O, 1.05 g/L; Na2HPO4, 3.05 g/L; NaCl, 4.52 g/L, Fenwal Inc.). Each platelet concentrate was collected in acid citrate dextrose anticoagulant according to AABB (formerly the “American Association of Blood Banks”) standards to contain ∼2.8 × 1011 to 4.2 × 1011 platelets per unit. Platelets were supplied by The Memorial Blood Center (St. Paul, MN). Plasma components were collected in sodium citrate anticoagulant on the Haemonetics PCS (Haemonetics Corp., Braintree, MA) and were obtained as fresh-frozen plasma from Plasma Biological Services (Memphis, TN).

Four replicate experiments were performed in platelet and plasma components. For each replicate two ABO-matched platelet units or two thawed, fresh-frozen plasma units were pooled. The volume of each platelet pool was adjusted to ∼610 mL, as determined by weight (density is 1.01 g/mL), with 37% autologous plasma/63% InterSol. The volume of each plasma pool was adjusted to ∼1,200 mL (density 1.023 g/mL). Approximately 30 mL was removed from each pool and set aside. An aliquot of a previously prepared frozen stock of CHIKV was quickly thawed in a 37°C water bath and 0.5 mL was collected for titer determination. Six mL of CHIKV stock was added to the platelet pool by a Luer lock and 13 mL was added to the plasma pool, resulting in a titer of ∼106 and 108 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50)/mL, respectively. The previously withdrawn 30 mL of blood component was then returned to the appropriate container through the same Luer lock, rinsing any residual virus through the docking tube and into the container. After mixing, each pool was split into two units, generating a unit 1 and unit 2 for each experimental replicate. Each platelet unit was ∼285 mL and each plasma unit ∼585 mL.

Each platelet and plasma unit was sterilely connected to the appropriate INTERCEPT processing set (Cerus Corporation) and the contents were passed through a PL 2411 plastic container holding 15 mL of 3 mM (platelets) or 6 mM (plasma) amotosalen, and into a PL 2410 plastic illumination container, resulting in a final amotosalen concentration of ∼150 μM. Samples were collected to determine the initial virus titer.

Each unit 1 received a single 3.0 J/cm2 UVA treatment, and each unit 2 received two consecutive 1.03 J/cm2 treatments. These doses are equal to or less than the treatment doses used commercially. Illumination was performed using an INTERCEPT illuminator (INT100, Cerus Corporation) according to the instrument manual. The single 3.0 J/cm2 UVA treatment reflects the commercial INTERCEPT process, whereas the 1.0 and 2.1 cm2 UVA treatments were used to demonstrate inactivation kinetics. Following each illumination (single 1.0 J/cm2, cumulative 2.1 J/cm2, and single 3.0 J/cm2), samples were withdrawn for CHIKV titer determination. All samples were frozen at −80°C until assayed.

To assess and quantify CHIKV viability, pre-illumination and stock virus samples were 10-fold serially diluted in L-15 medium with 5 U/mL heparin (platelet samples) or EE medium with 5 U/mL heparin (plasma samples). Heparin was included in the diluents to prevent the formation of clots when the anticoagulant in the blood product comes in contact with the divalent cations in the culture medium. Clots are disruptive to the cells and may cause a loss of assay sensitivity. Post-illumination samples were diluted 1:5 (platelets) or 1:4 (plasma), 1:10, and 1:100 in the same diluents. For platelet samples, 100 μL of each 1:10 and 1:100 dilution were added to 8 wells of a 96-well plate and 100 μL of each 1:5 dilution was added to 240 wells. One hundred μL of L-15 growth medium with 5 U/mL heparin containing ∼5 × 105 cells/mL of Vero cells were added to each well of the plate and plates were incubated at 37°C for 7 days before fixing and staining with a fixative containing amido black. The plates were then scored manually for infection by evaluating the cell monolayer for cytopathic effect. For plasma samples, 100 μL of each dilution of the pre-illumination samples was added to each of 6 wells of a 96-well plate containing Vero76 cells. The 1:4 dilution of each post-illumination plasma sample was added to 216 wells (unit 1) or 72 wells (unit 2), and the 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of all post-illumination plasma samples were added to 12 wells of a 96-well plate containing Vero76 cells. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified CO2 atmosphere and the cytopathic effect was evaluated using a light microscope every 1–2 days starting on Day 3 and continuing through Day 7 or 8. Each well was scored as positive or negative for cytopathic effect. Following scoring, a titer was calculated for each sample using the method of Reed and Muench59 based on the number of positive and negative wells in each dilution. For samples in which no viable CHIKV was detected in any of the wells inoculated (post-UVA samples), the titer was calculated as less than what the titer would be if one infectious virion were present in the total volume of blood product assayed. A large number of wells were inoculated with the 1:4 and 1:5 dilutions to maximize the total amount of treated blood product evaluated and thus to maximize the dynamic range of the assay and the level of inactivation demonstrated. Mean titers and SD for four replicates were expressed as TCID50/mL of sample.

Results

To evaluate CHIKV inactivation in human apheresis platelet concentrates and plasma components by photochemical treatment with amotosalen (150 μM) and UVA, CHIKV was added to platelet concentrates to titers of ∼6 log10TCID50/mL (strain OPY1) and to plasma components to a titer of ∼8 log10 TCID50/mL (strain S27). The two titers used represent the highest titers attainable for each strain tested. Vanlandingham and others60 recently published the molecular characterization of the OPY1 strain of CHIKV using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay and have correlated the infectivity with the genomic equivalents per mL (gEq/mL). A 200:1 relationship was found indicating that the molecular titer in platelets was ∼8 log gEq/mL. If the ratio of gEq to infectious titer is similar for the S27 strain as expected, molecular titers of ∼10 log gEq/mL were achieved in plasma since the starting titer of CHIKV S27 was higher. The components were then treated with amotosalen and 3.0, 2.1, or 1.0 J/cm2 UVA. The CHIKV was completely inactivated to the limit of detection (< −0.7 Log10TCID50/mL) at all experimental conditions in platelet components, resulting in inactivation of > 6.4 ± 0.6 log10TCID50 (Table 1). In plasma components, which were inoculated with 100-fold more CHIKV because of the higher stock virus titers achievable with strain S27, some residual viable virus was detected in some replicates of all experimental conditions (Table 2). However, inactivation to below the limit of detection in the assay was observed in half of the replicates following 3.0 J/cm2 UVA treatment and fewer than 1.3 log10 TCID50/mL was detected in the remaining replicates. Overall, inactivation of ≥ 7.6 ± 1.4 log TCID50 of CHIKV in plasma was observed (Table 2). Given the 200:1 ratio between the TCID50 and gEq/mL, levels of inactivation of > 8.7 and > 9.9 log gEq can be calculated for platelets and plasma, respectively, indicating a level of protection comparable to the highest levels of viremia observed in infected blood samples.6163 Pre-illumination titers of CHIKV in both blood components were in the range of expected values based on the titer of the stock virus, indicating that neither amotosalen alone nor the blood products alone inactivated CHIKV, nor did the blood products interfere with the sensitivity of detection of viable CHIKV (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Chikungunya virus (strain OPY1) inactivation in platelet concentrates after photochemical treatment with 150 μM amotosalen and varying UVA treatments

Replicate Titer (Log10TCID50/mL) Log reduction*
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 1 Unit 2
Pre-UVA Post 3.0 J/cm2 Pre-UVA Post 1.0 J/cm2 Post 2.1 J/cm2 3.0 J/cm2 1.0 J/cm2 2.1 J/cm2
1 4.8 < −0.7 4.6 < −0.7 < −0.7 > 5.5 > 5.2 > 5.2
2 6.1 < −0.7 5.8 < −0.7 < −0.7 > 6.7 > 6.5 > 6.5
3 6.1 < −0.7 5.9 < −0.7 < −0.7 > 6.7 > 6.6 > 6.6
4 6.1 < −0.7 5.7 < −0.7 < −0.7 > 6.7 > 6.3 > 6.3
Mean ± SD† 5.7 ± 0.6 < −0.7 5.5 ± 0.6 < −0.7 < −0.7 > 6.4 ± 0.6 > 6.2 ± 0.6 > 6.2 ± 0.6
*

Log reduction was calculated as log (pre-UVA titer ÷ post-UVA titer) where titers are expressed as log10TCID50/mL. Log reduction was calculated from numbers that were not rounded.

Means and standard deviations (SD) were determined from numbers that were not rounded.

Table 2.

Chikungunya virus (strain S27) inactivation in plasma after photochemical treatment with 150 μM amotosalen and varying UVA treatments

Replicate Titer (Log10TCID50/mL)* Log reduction
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 1 Unit 2
Pre-UVA Post 3.0 J/cm2 Pre-UVA Post 1.0 J/cm2 Post 2.1 J/cm2 3.0 J/cm2 1.0 J/cm2 2.1 J/cm2
1 8.8 < −0.7 8.8 1.0 to 1.3 1.0 to 1.3 > 9.5 7.5 to 7.8 7.5 to 7.8
2 6.9 < −0.7 7.3 1.1 to 1.3 < −0.3 > 7.6 6.0 to 6.3 > 7.6
3 8.4 1.0 to 1.3 8.5 1.1 to 1.3 −0.3 7.1 to 7.4 7.2 to 7.4 8.8
4 7.5 1.0 to 1.3 7.5 1.1 to 1.3 1.0 to 1.3 6.2 to 6.5 6.1 to 6.4 6.2 to 6.4
Mean ± SD‡ 7.8 ± 0.8 ≤ 0.3 ± 1.2 8.0 ± 0.8 1.1 to 1.3 ≤ 0.4 ± 0.7 ≥ 7.6 ± 1.4 6.7 to 7.0 ≥ 7.5 ± 1.1
*

Best and worst case titers were determined for samples in which at least one but less than half of the wells were positive in the most concentrated dilution plated (1:4). The worst case assumed that all the wells at the next lower dilution (undiluted) would have been positive if plated, and the best case assumed that 50% of the undiluted wells would have been positive if plated. Ranges in log reduction data are the result of using both best and worst case titers in log reduction calculations. When no virus was detected in the lowest dilution plated, the titer was determined to be < 1 in the total volume of blood product assayed.

Log reduction was calculated as log (pre-UVA titer ÷ post-UVA titer) where titers are expressed as Log10 TCID50/mL. Log reduction was calculated from numbers that were not rounded.

Means and standard deviations (SD) were determined from numbers that were not rounded. Only worst case determinations were used in the calculations of means and SDs that were ≥ or ≤ the stated value.

Discussion

Over the course of the last several years CHIKV has become one of the most important human pathogens in the alphavirus family. The CHIKV epidemic, which started in coastal Kenya in 2004,4 rapidly spread into countries of South-East Asia, Indian Ocean basin,513 and India14 affecting millions of people. In addition, CHIKV was introduced into Europe where it caused its first autochthonous outbreaks in 2007 and 2010.1618 Vectored by domestic Ae. aegypti and peridomestic Ae. albopictus mosquitoes widely distributed in the Old World and the Americas, CHIKV could potentially expand its range into the New World, where immunologically naive human populations could facilitate rapid spread of the virus. The consequences of such an event would have a considerable adverse effect on transfusion medicine.1

In many regards, the potential impact of CHIKV on transfusion medicine is similar to that of WNV, except that assays for screening CHIKV in blood products, such as detection of CHIKV RNA, have not been developed and implemented, leaving deferral of donors based on travel history as the only option for reducing the CHIKV transfusion risk in non-endemic regions and no real options for risk reduction in endemic regions.1 Although the majority of CHIKV infections are associated with febrile illness (> 75%)34,35 and these donors can be easily deferred, the viremic phase of CHIKV infections begins 1–2 days before the onset of symptoms, and about 6–20% of infections remain asymptomatic.33 In addition, the extremely high attack rate during CHIKV outbreaks suggests that a considerable proportion of donated blood may be contaminated with CHIKV in epidemic areas.

In this study, we showed that photochemical treatment of human apheresis platelet and plasma components with amotosalen and UVA effectively inactivates high concentrations of CHIKV. In fact, the virus is sufficiently sensitive to this photochemical treatment that complete inactivation was achieved in platelet components with as little as one-third the UVA dose used in the commercial treatment process. In addition, the use of two different CHIKV strains, which were isolated several decades apart shows that the virus retains its sensitivity to inactivation, regardless of whatever mutations may have accumulated over that time. The robust inactivation achieved is particularly noteworthy in light of the fact that CHIKV is highly platelet associated.64 As observed by Chernesky and others64 and Larke and Wheelock,65 mixing of human platelets with CHIKV leads to the sequestration of viral particles inside platelets aggregates in a way that stabilizes the infectivity of the virus. The sequestration is time dependent at 37°C. Therefore, the fact that the virus used in these studies is not produced in vivo does not appear to affect this property of the virus. It is not known whether the virus is physically located inside human platelets, or if the platelets aggregate and form a protective coating for the viral aggregates.64,65 The results of similar studies of the photochemical inactivation of CHIKV using riboflavin and UV light (Mirasol Pathogen Reduction [PR] System) in platelet components in platelet additive solution and in plasma components were recently published by Vanlandingham and others.60 Using the same strain of CHIKV used in the platelet studies presented here, 2.2 and 2.1 log reductions of CHIKV infectivity were observed in platelets and plasma, respectively, treated with the Mirasol system. Interestingly, higher inactivation was observed in cell culture media indicating an inhibitory effect on the Mirasol PR system in the presence of plasma and platelets. This may indicate protein interference or it may be a result of the known sequestration of CHIKV in platelets. This is in stark contrast to the results obtained for this study, where high levels of inactivation were achieved in the presence of platelets and of plasma, and may be the result of mechanistic differences between the two systems.

Considering that human viremia does not reach levels higher than 5–7 log10TCID50/mL1,60,6567 in ill individuals, it appears that this technology will result in complete inactivation of the presumably even lower levels of CHIKV in platelet and plasma components collected from asymptomatic donors. Even though it is impossible to guarantee that an infectious titer exceeding the capacity of the system will never occur, INTERCEPT inactivation of more than 5–6 log titers offers a significant risk reduction for transfusion-transmitted infections with these pathogens. This is especially pertinent in light of recent evidence that lower titer CHIKV viremia may be associated with different clinical outcomes than high titer viremia36; additionally, routine use of the pathogen inactivation system may be a viable alternative to the deferral of donors that have traveled in CHIKV endemic areas provided they meet the other screening criteria.

In northern Italy, all blood donations were halted during the CHIKV outbreak and this resulted in an economic loss exceeding 3 million euros1,31 caused by the expense of importing blood to sustain a local supply. In this regard, photochemical treatment of blood products with amotosalen and UVA could significantly reduce the risk of CHIKV transmission, and thus, represents an attractive means to prevent the disruption of a local supply of blood products in the affected areas during CHIKV outbreaks. This is particularly true of platelets because of their limited shelf life of 5 days.68 This theory was put into practice during the La Réunion outbreak when, in 2006, French authorities implemented mandatory photochemical treatment of platelet components with the INTERCEPT Blood System to reduce the risk of CHIKV transmission on La Réunion.32 Approximately 4,000 platelet units were administered over the course of 1 year, and no transfusion related CHIKV transmissions were documented. Although pathogen inactivation obviously adds cost to blood components, in the context of the current testing paradigm and assuming that there is no established nucleic acid test assay for a specific pathogen, it has been found that pathogen inactivation is more cost effective than NAT in terms of quality-adjusted life years, a measurement of clinical and cost effectiveness. Additionally, it has been recognized that pathogen inactivation can also be seen as an insurance policy against other chronic or acutely transmitted pathogens.69 The INTERCEPT system is in fact already in use in 17 countries and under evaluation in additional areas in which CHIKV and other pathogens are endemic or epidemic.70

In summary, our study shows that photochemical treatment of human apheresis platelet concentrates and plasma components with amotosalen and UVA results in efficient inactivation of high levels of CHIKV that would reduce or eliminate transfusion-transmitted infection. This suggests that photochemical treatment of platelet or plasma components would be an effective method for prevention of transfusion-transmitted CHIKV infection in the areas of CHIKV endemic/epidemic activity.

Footnotes

Financial support: Funding for this study was provided by Cerus Corporation.

Authors' addresses: Konstantin A. Tsetsarkin, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Neurotropic Flaviviruses Section, Bethesda, MD, E-mail: tsetsarkinka@niaid.nih.gov. Adam Sampson-Johannes, Lynette Sawyer, and John Kinsey, Cerus Corporation, Concord, CA, E-mails: Dna.3@sbcglobal.net, LSawyer@cerus.com, and shotokando@aol.com. Stephen Higgs, Biosecurity Research Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, E-mail: shiggs@k-state.edu. Dana L. Vanlandingham, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, E-mail: dlvanlan@vet.k-state.edu.

References

  • 1.Petersen LR, Stramer SL, Powers AM. Chikungunya virus: possible impact on transfusion medicine. Transfus Med Rev. 2010;24:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention West Nile Virus (WNV) Human Infections Reported to ArboNET by State, United States, 2012 (as of September 18, 2012) 2012. (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount12_detailed.htm Available at. Accessed September 20, 2012.
  • 3.Sergon K, Njuguna C, Kalani R, Ofula V, Onyango C, Konongoi LS, Bedno S, Burke H, Dumilla AM, Konde J, Njenga MK, Sang R, Breiman RF. Seroprevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection on Lamu Island, Kenya, October 2004. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:333–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kariuki Njenga M, Nderitu L, Ledermann JP, Ndirangu A, Logue CH, Kelly CH, Sang R, Sergon K, Breiman R, Powers AM. Tracking epidemic chikungunya virus into the Indian Ocean from East Africa. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2754–2760. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/005413-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sergon K, Yahaya AA, Brown J, Bedja SA, Mlindasse M, Agata N, Allaranger Y, Ball MD, Powers AM, Ofula V, Onyango C, Konongoi LS, Sang R, Njenga MK, Breiman RF. Seroprevalence of chikungunya virus infection on Grande Comore Island, Union of the Comoros, 2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:1189–1193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schuffenecker I, Iteman I, Michault A, Murri S, Frangeul L, Vaney MC, Lavenir R, Pardigon N, Reynes JM, Pettinelli F, Biscornet L, Diancourt L, Michel S, Duquerroy S, Guigon G, Frenkiel MP, Brehin AC, Cubito N, Despres P, Kunst F, Rey FA, Zeller H, Brisse S. Genome microevolution of chikungunya viruses causing the Indian Ocean outbreak. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.International Society for Infectious Diseases CHIKUNGUNYA, (04): MADAGASCAR (FIANARANTSOA) 2010. http://www.promedmail.org Archive number 2010026.0639. Available at. Accessed September 25, 2012.
  • 8.Kularatne SA, Gihan MC, Weerasinghe SC, Gunasena S. Concurrent outbreaks of chikungunya and dengue fever in Kandy, Sri Lanka, 2006–07: a comparative analysis of clinical and laboratory features. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:342–346. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.066746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoosuf AA, Shiham I, Mohamed AJ, Ali G, Luna JM, Pandav R, Gongal GN, Nisaluk A, Jarman RG, Gibbons RV. First report of chikungunya from the Maldives. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sam IC, Chan YF, Chan SY, Loong SK, Chin HK, Hooi PS, Ganeswrie R, Abubakar S. Chikungunya virus of Asian and Central/East African genotypes in Malaysia. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:180–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.AbuBakar S, Sam IC, Wong PF, MatRahim N, Hooi PS, Roslan N. Reemergence of endemic chikungunya, Malaysia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:147–149. doi: 10.3201/eid1301.060617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ng LC, Tan LK, Tan CH, Tan SS, Hapuarachchi HC, Pok KY, Lai YL, Lam-Phua SG, Bucht G, Lin RT, Leo YS, Tan BH, Han HK, Ooi PL, James L, Khoo SP. Entomologic and virologic investigation of chikungunya, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1243–1249. doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rianthavorn P, Prianantathavorn K, Wuttirattanakowit N, Theamboonlers A, Poovorawan Y. An outbreak of chikungunya in southern Thailand from 2008 to 2009 caused by African strains with A226V mutation. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14((Suppl 3)):e161–e165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yergolkar PN, Tandale BV, Arankalle VA, Sathe PS, Sudeep AB, Gandhe SS, Gokhle MD, Jacob GP, Hundekar SL, Mishra AC. Chikungunya outbreaks caused by African genotype, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1580–1583. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.International Society for Infectious Diseases CHIKUNGUNYA, (30): CHINA (GUANGDONG), REUNION. Archive number 20101008.3661. 2010. http://www.promedmail.org Available at. Accessed September 25, 2012.
  • 16.Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Silvi G, Macini P, Fortuna C, Venturi G, Magurano F, Fiorentini C, Marchi A, Benedetti E, Bucci P, Boros S, Romi R, Majori G, Ciufolini MG, Nicoletti L, Rezza G, Cassone A. Chikungunya in north-eastern Italy: a summing up of the outbreak. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:E071122. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.47.03313-en. 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rezza G, Nicoletti L, Angelini R, Romi R, Finarelli AC, Panning M, Cordioli P, Fortuna C, Boros S, Magurano F, Silvi G, Angelini P, Dottori M, Ciufolini MG, Majori GC, Cassone A. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet. 2007;370:1840–1846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61779-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grandadam M, Caro V, Plumet S, Thiberge JM, Souares Y, Failloux AB, Tolou HJ, Budelot M, Cosserat D, Leparc-Goffart I, Despres P. Chikungunya virus, southeastern France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:910–913. doi: 10.3201/eid1705.101873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schwartz O, Albert ML. Biology and pathogenesis of chikungunya virus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:491–500. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mavalankar D, Shastri P, Bandyopadhyay T, Parmar J, Ramani KV. Increased mortality rate associated with chikungunya epidemic, Ahmedabad, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:412–415. doi: 10.3201/eid1403.070720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Casolari S, Briganti E, Zanotti M, Zauli T, Nicoletti L, Magurano F, Fortuna C, Fiorentini C, Grazia Ciufolini M, Rezza G. A fatal case of encephalitis associated with chikungunya virus infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40:995–996. doi: 10.1080/00365540802419055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ganesan K, Diwan A, Shankar SK, Desai SB, Sainani GS, Katrak SM. Chikungunya encephalomyeloradiculitis: report of 2 cases with neuroimaging and 1 case with autopsy findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1636–1637. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Josseran L, Paquet C, Zehgnoun A, Caillere N, Le Tertre A, Solet JL, Ledrans M. Chikungunya disease outbreak, Reunion Island. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1994–1995. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramchurn SK, Goorah SS, Makhan M, Moheeput K. Excess mortality as an epidemic intelligence tool in chikungunya mapping. Euro Surveill. 2008;13:8039. doi: 10.2807/ese.13.07.08039-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tandale BV, Sathe PS, Arankalle VA, Wadia RS, Kulkarni R, Shah SV, Shah SK, Sheth JK, Sudeep AB, Tripathy AS, Mishra AC. Systemic involvements and fatalities during chikungunya epidemic in India, 2006. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Powers AM, Logue CH. Changing patterns of chikungunya virus: re-emergence of a zoonotic arbovirus. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:2363–2377. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82858-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jupp PG, McIntosh BM. Chikungunya virus disease. In: Monath TP, editor. The Arboviruses: Epidemiology and Ecology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1988. pp. 137–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsetsarkin KA, Vanlandingham DL, McGee CE, Higgs S. A single mutation in chikungunya virus affects vector specificity and epidemic potential. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsetsarkin KA, Chen R, Leal G, Forrester N, Higgs S, Huang J, Weaver SC. Chikungunya virus emergence is constrained in Asia by lineage-specific adaptive landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7872–7877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018344108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benedict MQ, Levine RS, Hawley WA, Lounibos LP. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:76–85. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2006.0562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liumbruno GM, Calteri D, Petropulacos K, Mattivi A, Po C, Macini P, Tomasini I, Zucchelli P, Silvestri AR, Sambri V, Pupella S, Catalano L, Piccinini V, Calizzani G, Grazzini G. The chikungunya epidemic in Italy and its repercussion on the blood system. Blood Transfus. 2008;6:199–210. doi: 10.2450/2008.0016-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rasongles P, Angelini-Tibert MF, Simon P, Currie C, Isola H, Kientz D, Slaedts M, Jacquet M, Sundin D, Lin L, Corash L, Cazenave JP. Transfusion of platelet components prepared with photochemical pathogen inactivation treatment during a chikungunya virus epidemic in Ile de La Reunion. Transfusion. 2009;49:1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brouard C, Bernillon P, Quatresous I, Pillonel J, Assal A, De Valk H, Desenclos JC. Estimated risk of Chikungunya viremic blood donation during an epidemic on Reunion Island in the Indian Ocean, 2005 to 2007. Transfusion. 2008;48:1333–1341. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sissoko D, Moendandze A, Malvy D, Giry C, Ezzedine K, Solet JL, Pierre V. Seroprevalence and risk factors of chikungunya virus infection in Mayotte, Indian Ocean, 2005–2006: a population-based survey. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Queyriaux B, Simon F, Grandadam M, Michel R, Tolou H, Boutin JP. Clinical burden of chikungunya virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:2–3. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70294-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Appassakij H, Khuntikij P, Kemapunmanus M, Wutthanarungsan R, Silpapojakul K. Viremic profiles in asymptomatic and symptomatic chikungunya fever: a blood transfusion threat? Transfusion. 2012;26 doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03960.x. [Epub ahead of print] 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gerardin P, Guernier V, Perrau J, Fianu A, Le Roux K, Grivard P, Michault A, de Lamballerie X, Flahault A, Favier F. Estimating chikungunya prevalence in La Reunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: two methods for two critical times of the epidemic. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lin L, Hanson CV, Alter HJ, Jauvin V, Bernard KA, Murthy KK, Metzel P, Corash L. Inactivation of viruses in platelet concentrates by photochemical treatment with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light. Transfusion. 2005;45:580–590. doi: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2005.04316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Van Voorhis WC, Barrett LK, Eastman RT, Alfonso R, Dupuis K. Trypanosoma cruzi inactivation in human platelet concentrates and plasma by a psoralen (amotosalen HCl) and long-wavelength UV. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:475–479. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.475-479.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Singh Y, Sawyer LS, Pinkoski LS, Dupuis KW, Hsu JC, Lin L, Corash L. Photochemical treatment of plasma with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light inactivates pathogens while retaining coagulation function. Transfus. 2006;46:1168–1177. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00867.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lin L, Dikeman R, Molini B, Lukehart S, Lane R, Dupuis K, Metzel P, Corash L. Photochemical treatment of platelet concentrates with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light inactivates a broad spectrum of pathogenic bacteria. Transfusion. 2004;44:1496–1504. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grellier P, Benach J, Labaied M, Cahrneau S, Gil H, Monsalve G, Alfonso R, Sawyer L, Lin L, Steiert M, Dupuis K. Photochemical inactivation with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light of Plasmodium and Babesia in platelet and plasma components. Transfusion. 2008;48:1676–1684. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sawyer L, Hanson D, Castro G, Luckett W, Dubensky TW, Stassinopoulos A. Inactivation of parvovirus B19 in human platelet concentrates by treatment with amotosalen and ultraviolet A illumination. Transfusion. 2007;47:1062–1070. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grass JA, Hei DJ, Metchette K, Cimino GD, Weisenhahn GP, Corash L, Lin L. Inactivation of leukocytes in platelet concentrates by photochemical treatment with psoralen plus UVA. Blood. 1998;91:2180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eastman RT, Barrett LK, Dupuis K, Buckner FS, Van Voorhis WC. Leishmania inactivation in human pheresis platelets by a psoralen (amotosalen HCl) and long-wavelength ultraviolet irradiation. Transfusion. 2005;45:1459–1463. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin L, Cook DN, Wiesehahn GP, Alfonso R, Behrman B, Cimino GD, Corten L, Damonte PB, Dikeman R, Dupuis K, Fang YM, Hanson CV, Hearst JE, Lin CY, Londe HF, Metchette K, Nerio AT, Pu JT, Reames AA, Rheinschmidt M, Tessman J, Isaacs ST, Wollowitz S, Corash L. Photochemical inactivation of viruses and bacteria in platelet concentrates by use of a novel psoralen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light. Transfusion. 1997;37:423–435. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37497265344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wollowitz S. Fundamentals of the psoralen-based helinx technology for inactivation of infectious pathogens and leukocytes in platelets and plasma. Semin Hematol. 2001;38((Suppl 11)):4–11. doi: 10.1016/s0037-1963(01)90118-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Irsch J, Pinkoski L, Corash L, Lin L. INTERCEPT plasma: comparability with conventional fresh-frozen plasma based on coagulation function – an in vitro analysis. Vox Sang. 2010;98:47–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lin L, Alfonso R, Behrman B, Corten L, Damonte PB, Dikeman R, Dupuis K, Hei D, Lin CY, Londe HF, Metchette K, Phan T, Reames AA, Rheinschmidt M, Savoor A, Tessman J, Corash L. Photochemical treatment of platelet concentrates with a novel psoralen and UVA to enhance the safety of platelet transfusions. Infusther Tranfsusmed. 1998;25:39–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.McCullough J, Vesole DH, Benjamin RJ, Slichter SJ, Pineda A, Snyder E, Stadtmauer EA, Lopez-Plaza I, Coutre S, Strauss RG, Goodnough LT, Fridey JL, Raife T, Cable R, Murphy S, Howard FT, Davis K, Lin JS, Metzel P, Corash L, Koutsoukos A, Lin L, Buchholz DH, Conlan MG. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of platelets treated with a photochemical process for pathogen inactivation: the SPRINT Trial. Blood. 2004;104:1534–1541. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.de Alarcon P, Benjamin R, Dugdale M, Kessler C, Shopnick R, Smith P, Abshire T, Hambleton J, Matthew P, Ortiz I, Cohen A, Konkle BA, Streiff M, Lee M, Wages D, Corash L. Fresh frozen plasma prepared with amotosalen HCl (S-59) photochemical pathogen inactivation: transfusion of patients with congenital coagulation factor deficiencies. Transfusion. 2005;45:1362–1372. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van Rhenen D, Gulliksson H, Cazenave JP, Pamphilon D, Ljungman P, Kluter H, Vermeij H, Kappers-Klunne M, de Greef G, Laforet M, Lioure B, Davis K, Marblie S, Mayaudon V, Flament J, Conlan M, Lin L, Metzel P, Buchholz D, Corash L. Transfusion of pooled buffy coat platelet components prepared with photochemical pathogen inactivation treatment: the euroSPRITE trial. Blood. 2003;101:2426–2433. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lin L, Conlan MG, Tessman J, Cimino G, Porter S. Amotosalen interactions with platelet and plasma components: absence of neoantigen formation after photochemical treatment. Transfusion. 2005;45:1610–1620. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.ANSM French Agency for the Safety of Health Products. France Annual Haemovigilance report 2009. 2013. http://www.ansm.sante.fr/Mediatheque/Publications/Information-in-English Available at. Accessed September 20, 2012.
  • 55.Cazenave JP, Isola H, Waller C, Mendel I, Kientz D, Laforet M, Raidot JP, Kandel G, Wiesel ML, Corash L. Use of additive solutions and pathogen inactivation treatment of platelet components in a regional blood center: impact on patient outcomes and component utilization during a 3-year period. Transfusion. 2011;51:622–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02873.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Osselaer JC, Cazenave JP, Lambermont M, Garraud O, Hidajat M, Barbolla L, Tardivel R, Defoin L, Waller C, Mendel I, Raidot JP, Kandel G, De Meuter R, Fabrigli P, Dehenau D, Arroyo JL, Padron F, Gouezec H, Corral M, Jacquet M, Sundin D, Lin L, Corash L. An active haemovigilance programme characterizing the safety profile of 7437 platelet transfusions prepared with amotosalen photochemical treatment. Vox Sang. 2008;94:315–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Osselaer JC, Doyen C, Defoin L, Debry C, Goffaux M, Messe N, Van Hooydonk M, Bosly A, Lin JS, Lin L, Corash L. Universal adoption of pathogen inactivation of platelet components: impact on platelet and red blood cell component use. Transfusion. 2009;49:1412–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Devine DV, Sher GD, Reesink HW, Panzer S, Hetzel PA, Wong JK, Horvath M, Leitner GC, Schennach H, Nussbaumer W, Genoe K, Cioffi JM, Givisiez FN, Rogerson M, Howe D, Delage G, Sarappa C, Charbonneau, Fu Y, Sarlija D, Vuk T, Strauss Patko M, Balija M, Jukic I, Ali A, Auvinen MK, Jaakonsalo E, Cazenave JP, Waller C, Kientz D, David B, Walther-Wenke G, Heiden M, Lin CK, Tsoi WC, Lee CK, Barotine-Toth K, Sawant RB, Murphy W, Quirke B, Bowler P, Shinar E, Yahalom V, Aprili G, Piccoli P, Gandini G, Tadokaro K, Nadarajan VS, de Kort W, Jansen N, Flanagan P, Forsberg PO, Hervig T, Letowska M, Lachert E, Dudziak K, Antoniewicz-Papis J, de Olim G, Nascimento F, Hindawi S, Teo D, Reddy R, Scholtz J, Swanevelder R, Rovira LP, Sauleda S, Carasa MA, Vaquero MP, Ania MA, Gulliksson H, Holdsworth S, Cotton S, Howell C, Baldwin C, Cusick RM, Geele GA, Paden C, McEvoy P, Gottschall JL, McLaughlin LS, Benjamin RJ, Eder A, Draper NL, AuBuchon JP, Leon de Gonzalez G. Inventory management. Vox Sang. 2010;98:e295–e363. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method for estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938;27:493–497. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vanlandingham DL, Keil SD, McElroy Horne K, Pyles R, Goodrich RP, Higgs S. Photochemical inactivation of chikungunya virus in plasma and platelets using the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system. Transfusion. 2012;53:284–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Leo YS, Chow ALP, Tan LK, Lye DC, Lin L, Ng LC. Chikungunya outbreak, Singapore 2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:836–837. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sourisseau M, Schilte C, Casartelli N, Trouillet C, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rudnicka D, Sol-Foulon N, Le Roux K, Prevost MC, Fsihi H, Frenkiel MP, Blanchet F, Afonso PV, Ceccaldi PE, Ozden S, Gessain A, Schuffenecker I, Verhasselt B, Zamborlini A, Saïb A, Rey FA, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Desprès P, Michault A, Schwartz O. Characterization of reemerging chikungunya virus. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e89. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McIntosh BM, Paterson HE, Donaldson JM, de Sousa J. Chikungunya virus: viral susceptibility and transmission studies with some vertebrates. S Afr J Med Sci. 1963;28:45. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chemsky MA, Larke RP. Contrasting effects of rabbit and human platelets on chikungunya virus infectivity. Can J Microbiol. 1977;23:1237–1244. doi: 10.1139/m77-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Larke RP, Wheelock EF. Stabilization of chikungunya virus infectivity by human blood platelets. J Infect Dis. 1970;122:523–531. doi: 10.1093/infdis/122.6.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Parola P, de Lamballerie X, Jourdan J, Rovery C, Vaillant V, Minodier P, Brouqui P, Flahault A, Raoult D, Charrel RN. Novel chikungunya virus variant in travelers returning from Indian Ocean islands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1493–1499. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Carletti F, Bordi L, Chiappini R, Ippolito G, Sciarrone MR, Capobianchi MR, Di Caro A, Castilletti C. Rapid detection and quantification of chikungunya virus by a one-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction real-time assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:521–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tomson B, Brand A. In vivo tracking of transfused platelets for recovery and survival studies: an appraisal of labeling methods. Transfus Apheresis Sci. 2010;42:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Custer B, Agapova M, Martinez RH. The cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction technology as assessed using a multiple risk reduction model. Transfusion. 2010;50:2461–2473. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.INTERCEPT In Use Intercept Blood System. 2012. www.interceptbloodsystem.com/intercept-in-use/overview.html Available at. Accessed December 15, 2012.

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

RESOURCES