Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct 21;206(5):390–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.858

Gynecologic care for breast cancer survivors: assisting in the transition to wellness

Ritu Salani 1, Barbara L Andersen 1
PMCID: PMC3752900  NIHMSID: NIHMS501890  PMID: 22177185

Abstract

Currently, there are >2 million survivors of breast cancer in the United States. Two years after cancer treatment, patients may transition to primary care providers and/or gynecologists. Many of these survivors may have difficulties with menopausal symptoms. If they do not know already, some of these women may want or need risk assessment for hereditary-or treatment-induced second cancers. At least 20% will also have significant psychologic, sexual, and/or relationship difficulties that require attention. All of the women will need assistance to learn and follow recommendations for surveillance, detecting recurrence, and promoting wellness. Thus, gynecologists play a critical role in helping these patients in their health care transitions. To assist the gynecologists, we have reviewed the evaluation and management of common sequelae of breast cancer diagnoses and treatments.

Keywords: breast cancer, depression, menopause, sexuality


More than 200,000 women in the United States are diagnosed with breast cancer annually, which ranks it the most common noncutaneous cancer in women.1 Although the incidence of breast cancer climbed from 1994–1999, rates have declined approximately 2% annually from 1999–2006. Hypotheses for the decline have centered on the 2002 publication of the Women’s Health Initiative data that showed a link between the increased risk for coronary heart disease and breast cancer and the use of estrogen plus progestin hormonal replacement therapy.2 Currently, the 5-year relative survival rates for breast cancer are 98% for stage I disease and 84% for regional disease.3 As a result, survivors of breast cancer account for 23% of all cancer survivors and 40% of the 5.8 million female survivors alive today.4 Many survivors will continue to receive care from oncologists, although this will become more difficult as the oncology workforce shrinks and the survivor population grows.5,6 Therefore, care for many survivors will transition to the primary care setting; for many women, that care will come from the obstetrician-gynecologist. However, providers may believe that they are unprepared to address the concerns of patients with cancer and patients with breast cancer in particular.7,8

One proposal to ease this transition has been the suggestion that oncologists should provide patients with an individualized cancer treatment summary (a synopsis of all treatments received, dates, and dosages) and a care plan (diseasespecific screening and follow-up interval recommendations, information on possible late effects/symptoms, health behavior recommendations, and any psychologic and social concerns) that the patient can then share with other providers.9 Thus far, implementation has been modest, with studies showing that <20% of patients receive this information.10 In this context, we highlight salient issues in comprehensive gynecologic care for the survivor of breast cancer.

Genetic testing and surveillance

Although hereditary cases account for only a small proportion of breast cancer cases (up to 10%), the identification of women with a family history of breast cancer is critical because of the significantly heightened risk for secondary cancers and premature death for themselves and, potentially, their relatives.11 Unfortunately, personal and family histories may not have been obtained, and the gynecologist may need to record a history on the patient’s return for care. If a patient is deemed high risk, she may benefit from genetic counseling and evaluation.12 Table 1 provides a list of factors that should be assessed for familial risks, which should evaluate both maternal and paternal lineages.12

TABLE 1.

High-risk factors for genetic predisposition

History Factor
Personal Breast cancer
Ovarian cancera
  Close relative with ovarian
cancer or premenopausal
breast cancer
  Ashkenazi Jewish
Ancestry
Early age (<40 y) onset
breast cancer
≥2 breast primaries
Family ≥2 breast primaries or breast
and ovarian cancer in close
relatives of the same parental
lineage
Family member with known
Mutation
Male breast cancer
a

Ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Salani. Gynecologic care for breast cancer survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012.

The most common genetic mutations are attributed to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These mutations place patients at increased risk for not only breast cancer but also ovarian and fallopian tube cancers. In high-risk patients, surveillance recommendations include semiannual breast examinations, annual mammograms, and annual magnetic resonance imaging, typically beginning at age 25 years.13 Coordination of care with medical oncologists and breast surgeons may also provide risk-reducing strategies such as the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators or prophylactic mastectomy.14

Because these patients are at increased risk for the development of ovarian and fallopian tube cancers, the gynecologist must be aware of the options that are available to decrease morbidity and mortality rates in these patients.15 Depending on patient age and preference, this may range from screening evaluation to medical or surgical intervention.

General recommendations for screening for ovarian cancer in BRCA carriers include the evaluation of CA-125 levels and transvaginal ultrasound beginning between ages 30–35 years or 5–10 years before the earliest age of diagnosis. However, patients should be aware of limitations for ovarian cancer screening, including failure to reduce mortality rates.1517

Medical intervention includes the use of oral contraceptives; however, their use in patients with a history of breast cancer is controversial.17 Because the risk of ovarian cancer increases after the age of 40 years, patients who are BRCA mutation carriers should be offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after the completion of childbearing or when the patient reaches ≥35 years of age. This procedure is associated with a risk reduction of 85–96% for gynecologic cancers, because there is a continued risk of primary peritoneal cancer and a 40–70% risk reduction of breast cancer.18,19 The added removal of the uterus should be an individualized decision. Patients should be counseled on the benefits of the removal of the fallopian tube, a simplified hormone replacement plan, and the elimination of the risk of uterine cancer (particularly in women receiving tamoxifen therapy). Risks for the additional surgery include the possibility of increased surgical morbidity, a longer operative time, and an inpatient stay.20

Menstrual function and fertility

Alterations in menstrual function and fertility may occur in women who receive chemotherapy for breast cancer. Typically, women <35 years old will resume menses 2 years after treatment, with outcomes more variable for the women ≥35 years old.21 Women who receive selective estrogen receptor modulators may experience menstrual dysfunction and hot flashes. However, these agents do not affect fertility (and may even enhance it) and are contraindicated in pregnancy.21 Therefore, during and after cancer treatment, reproductive-age women should consider the use of nonhormonal contraception such as barrier methods, an intrauterine device, or sterilization (if desired).

Although safety data of these approaches are limited in survivors of breast cancer, if a patient desires continued fertility, options to be considered before the start of cancer therapy include assisted reproductive technology, embryo fertilization, and ova harvesting.22 Data show that survivors of breast cancer who become pregnant within 6 months of treatment have a poor prognosis; however, the 5-year survival rate is 54%, compared with 78% for those who became pregnant between 6 months to 2 years.21 Therefore, general recommendations are for survivors to wait at least until the 2-year disease-free point before attempting pregnancy.21

Management of menopausal symptoms

Early studies reported that hormone therapy was acceptable for use in survivors of breast cancer.2325 However, in a randomized controlled trial (Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer—is it safe?), an increase in breast cancer events was found in the hormone replacement group (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–7.4).26 Another trial with women with early-stage breast cancer found the 5-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer of 22.2% in the hormone replacement arm far exceeded the 8.0% risk in the control arm.27,28 Studies have also shown that megestrol acetate significantly decreased the incidence of hot flashes, compared with placebo (85% vs 21%, respectively).29 However, because of a potential association between progestational agents and breast cancer risk, their use has fallen out of favor. Thus, routine use of hormone therapy is not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer, and alternative therapies should be considered.30

With these findings, attention has turned to nonhormonal therapies. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors have also been used for the amelioration of hot flashes. Favorable results have been demonstrated with paroxetine, fluoxetine, citalopram, and venlafaxine in the reduction of hot flashes, anxiety, and sleep disturbances.31,32 All practitioners should be aware that certain medications, such as fluoxetine and paroxetine, inhibit the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 function and may interfere with the metabolism of tamoxifen, possibly increasing the risk of breast cancer recurrence.

Venlafaxine has minimal effect on CYP2D6 function and is the recommended selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for women receiving tamoxifen therapy.33,34 Clonidine, a centrally acting alpha-adrenergic agonist, has been shown to reduce the incidence of tamoxifen-induced hot flashes by 15%. Another agent, gabapentin, which is structurally similar to γ-aminobutyric acid, was comparable with estrogen and superior to placebo in the reduction of hot flashes. However, the benefits of these agents are often overshadowed by their side-effects and other agents (such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) typically are preferred.3436

Physicians might also consider complementary and/or alternative therapies for vasomotor symptoms. The plant, black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa), which originally was used by Native Americans for menstrual-related disorders, has been used but failed to demonstrate superiority compared with placebo.37 Soy food, which contains phytoestrogens that are structurally similar to estradiol, have also been evaluated. Thus far, the literature is inconclusive, although trials are ongoing.38 Other complementary therapies that have been or are being studied include red clover, flaxseed, vitamin E, primrose oil, dong quai, ginseng, and wild yam.31 Furthermore, the use of acupuncture and stress reduction methods (progressive muscle or biofeedback-assisted relaxation training, yoga, hypnosis) and exercise have been evaluated.31 Small trials have shown promising results; however, larger studies and randomized trials are needed to evaluate efficacy.31

Complicated survivorship: psychological, social, and sexual issues

Most women who are treated and remain disease free have a quality of life trajectory much like that of women with no cancer history.39,40 However, 20–40% of all patients will have their survivorship complicated by poor adjustment, quality of life, or persistent morbidities from the disease or its treatment.

Mood and anxiety disorders

Mood disorders are common, disabling, and unremitting. More than16%ofpeo-ple will experience a major depressive disorder (MDD) in their lifetime, with 6.6% of people will meet the criteria for depression within a 12-month period.41 It is also the case that depression and anxiety cooccur, so upward of 50% of patients with MDD will have a comorbid anxiety disorder and vice versa.42,43 The most common disorders (MDD and generalized anxiety) are more common for women than men, and depression is the leading cause of disease-related disability among women.44 For patients with cancer, metaanalysis shows the point prevalence of MDD to be 12.5%, which is 4 times the rate of 3.3% in the general population (Wu SM and Andersen BL. Prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personal communication.). When the primary diagnostic categories are considered, the point prevalence estimates are extremely high: 23.2% for all mood disorders, 18% for all anxiety disorders, and 14.1% for all adjustment disorders. With base rates being so high, one might expect that patients with psychiatric comorbidity would be identified readily, but they are not. Health care professionals miss symptoms in two-thirds of the patients with these disorders, under estimate the severity of the disorder, and thus undertreat the disorder.4549 Mood disorders are associated with lowered quality of life, a loss of work productivity, and soaring health care costs.50,51 In the context of cancer, the concerns are magnified, and the outcomes are worsened.52,53 The sequelae include more symptom distress, poorer quality of life, greater fatigue, less meaning in life, maladaptive coping, and employment absenteeism, among others.5463 Clinical depression is also associated with heightened risk for premature mortality (relative risk, 1.22–1.39).64,65 For patients with breast cancer, both cancer death (relative risk, 1.18) and all-cause death rates (relative risk, 1.31) are elevated.65,66 Conversely, a decrease in depressive symptoms is associated with longer survival.67

There are recommendations and clinical guidelines for depression screening for adults in primary care.6870 Practitioner awareness of risk factors for depressive and anxiety disorders is an important first step; Table 2 provides a summary and useful first level questions that, when answered in the affirmative, can then be followed with reliable and valid self-report measures. Further, the questions are brief, understandable, readable, and face valid. If significant symptoms are identified, referral to specific resources or professionals (pharmacotherapist, psychologist) who are trained to treat psychiatric disorders is essential. Triage and staff-assisted care support referral follow US Preventive Service Recommendations (2009) and is the only method that has been found to significantly impact subsequent levels of distress; screening alone, even with patient feedback, is insufficient.68,69,71

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of risk and screening for significant emotional distress

Factor Assessment strategies
Risk Other psychiatric disorders (eg, substance use)
Familial psychiatric history (1st degree relative)
≥2 chronic illnesses (including chronic pain)
Obesity
Social isolation (eg, no spouse or partner)
Recent (<6 mo) major stressor (eg, child loss, divorce, death of
close family member)
Lower socioeconomic status, unemployment, and/or financial strain
Older or elderly age
Assessment
  Depressed mood First level
  “Do you often feel sad or depressed?”
  “In the past 2 years, have you been bothered by depressed mood
  most of the day, on more days than not?”
Second level
  Beck Depression Inventory or Geriatric Depression Scale
  Anxiety
First level
  “Do you feel tense, anxious, or nervous on most days?”
  “Do you worry all the time?”
Second level
  General: Beck Anxiety Inventory
  Generalized anxiety disorder: Pennsylvania State Worry
  Questionnaire

Salani. Gynecologic care for breast cancer survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012.

Efficacious treatments for disorders exist. Generally, the primary options for MDD, for example, are antidepressant medication or cognitive behavior therapy.72,73 However, there are only 5 random controlled trials with antidepressant medications with patients with cancer, and the available data are not compelling.74,75 In 3 trials, mianserin and paroxetine were associated with symptom improvement compared with placebo, but the remaining 2 trials found null effects for fluoxetine and worse effects for desipramine or paroxetine.7680 We note, however, that venlafaxine is at least as efficacious as any of the other widely used antidepressants and has the additional advantage of reducing the frequency and intensity of hot flashes for these patients.81 Considering psychotherapy, in studies of patients with no cancer, cognitive behavior therapy is as effective as antidepressant medication during the acute phase of MDD treatment; however, patients who undergo cognitive behavior therapy are at lower risk for relapse.82 Results of cognitive behavior therapy combined with cancer-specific elements to reduce stress are promising.83

Sexual concerns and sexual dysfunction

There is extensive literature on the sexual morbidities after breast cancer, most of which focus on the newly diagnosed patient who is coping with mastectomy and adjuvant treatments.84 For these women, there is an immediate reduction in sexual activity and responsiveness; for most of the women, this disruption does not resolve.85 For example, we followed patients (n = 163) longitudinally.86 Patients with partners reported that, before diagnosis, the frequency of intercourse was approximately once per week. The frequency dropped by one-half (1–2 times/month) when chemotherapy was initiated; during the next 5 years, there was no return to precancer levels and was little improvement overall. The same trajectory was found with data on sexual satisfaction. Thus, by the time a patient returns to her gynecologist, it is likely that sexuality has declined and stabilized at a level below that before cancer diagnosis.74,87 This is generally true for all, but particularly so for those women who undergo radical surgeries rather than segmental mastectomy. An even more difficult trajectory is seen for women with recurrence. In these cases, sexual activity declines once again at diagnosis and continues to do so thereafter.88 There are individual differences among patients, with the greatest disruption for those with disseminated (distant) disease and/or those younger (<55 years).86 For many women who are treated for breast cancer, a contributor to their sexual difficulties is the stress with body changes.89 Significantly higher levels of traumatic stress over breast changes are found with women who have received a modified radical mastectomy vs those who received breast conservation. There is considerable variability in cosmetic outcomes for those women who undergo reconstructive surgery, and data show that it is not a panacea. In fact, the data show worse outcomes (lower levels of sexual activity and less sexual responsiveness) for patients who undergo reconstruction compared with outcomes for patients who do not.85

There are limited interventions that the gynecologist may use that can produce significant relief.90 First, acknowledgment to the patient that sexual problems after breast cancer are common may be of some help. In particular, the most frequent symptom is a loss of sexual desire. Fatigue can be a powerful contributor, because it remains a significant problem; full recovery takes upwards of 2 years after all cancer treatments to end.91 Patients are unaware that recovery time is this lengthy. Also, useful sexual educational materials are available (the American Cancer Society’s Sexuality and Cancer booklet). Second, managing menopausal symptoms relevant to vaginal health should be addressed for all patients. The most common symptom is vaginal dryness, which can be reduced with instructions to use vaginal moisturizers or vaginal lubricants.92 Another consideration is the use of vaginal estrogen therapy (creams, tablets, estrogen- releasing ring), which have minimal systemic absorption and high patient satisfaction rates.93,94 Although studies are limited, these local therapy options have a high success rate (80%) and have been used safely in survivors of breast cancer.92,93 However, the use of local estrogen therapy may negate the benefit of aromatase inhibitors and should not be recommended in patients who undergo this therapy.95,96 Vaginal dryness may be accompanied by diminished sensation and pleasure and possibly dyspareunia with partnered activity. For pervasive sexual difficulties, referral of patients to professionals with training in behavioral sex therapies is advised.

Many women with mood or sexual difficulties may be doubly burdened if the difficulties arise in the context of a troubled partnered relationship. Mood disorders, typically depression, are a particular problem.97 Marital distress is usually a chronic problem.98,99 Among patients with cancer whose marriages fail, it is not because relationships become discontented after cancer diagnosis. Divorce and breakups occur primarily among those women who report that marital difficulties predated their diagnosis.39,100 For patients who remain partnered, marital distress is associated with continued stress and slowed post-treatment recovery. All patients have stress when diagnosed with cancer, but stress declines more slowly and can remain elevated for years for the maritally distressed.101 Also, maritally distressed patients have more symptoms/signs of illness and treatment side-effects. Thus, referral of patients for psychologic assistance is made all the more important when mood and/or sexual difficulties are accompanied by marital distress.

Surveillance and late onset morbidities

The appropriate follow-up examinations and tests must be conducted to minimize morbidity and death. The first 5 years after cancer treatment is the period of highest risk for recurrence. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggest surveillance should consist of a physical examination every 4–6 months for 5 years and an annual mammography.21 Additional tests, such as bone scans and chest radiographs, should be ordered only if disease recurrence is suspected.21 Patients should be counseled on signs and symptoms, including bone pain and shortness of breath, that may be signs of metastatic disease that requires further evaluation. Therefore, gynecologists should be comfortable with performing a comprehensive breast examination, following surveillance guidelines, and evaluating for recurrent disease. Table 3 provides a list of recommendations for follow-up care for survivors of breast cancer.

TABLE 3.

Surveillance and screening recommendations for survivors of breast cancer

Variable Screening Examination Additional considerations
Breast cancer Annual mammography Every 4–6 mo for 5 y Consider magnetic resonance imaging
and genetic testing
Gynecologic care Cervical cytologic tests Annual examination Assess for menopausal symptoms
Uterine cancer evaluation Assess for abnormal bleeding,
particularly in tamoxifen users
Endometrial sampling if bleeding
present
BRCA carriers: ovarian cancer
evaluation
Ultrasound and CA-125 yearly Semiannual examination Risk-reducing surgery and genetic
Testing
Colorectal cancer screening Colonoscopy every 5–10 y,
beginning at age 50 y
Hemoccult testing annually
Osteoporosis: postmenopausal
women
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
scan every 2 y
Prevention with calcium/vitamin D and
bisphosphonates

Salani. Gynecologic care for breast cancer survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012.

Lymphedema

One of the mostcommon surgical complications for patients with breast cancer is lymphedema, which has been reported in upwards of 60% of cases.102 Patients should be counseled that the risk of lymphedema could be reduced by performing arm exercises, wearing a compression sleeve, and minimizing trauma (intravenous medications, blood pressure) in the affected arm. If lymphedema develops, early intervention with compression sleeves and physical therapy may reduce its severity. As recent data have shown, regarding the comparable survival for patients who are treated with sentinel lymph node dissection (when compared with patients who are treated with standard axillary lymph node dissection), the incidence of this chronic morbidity, hopefully, will decline.103

Osteoporosis

Patients who undergo premature menopause are at high risk for osteoporosis. Additionally, the use of tamoxifen, which may be used in the prevention and treatment of receptor positive breast cancer, has been shown to promote osteoporosis in premenopausal women.104 More recently, aromatase inhibitors (letrozole and arimidex), which are also used in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis.104 Patients who are at increased risk should be advised to use calcium (1200–1500 mg daily) and vitamin D (400–800 international units) and should be monitored with bone density testing. If the development of osteoporosis occurs, patients may be candidates for bisphosphonate therapy or raloxifene, which unlike tamoxifen, has been shown to reduce the osteoporosis risk.105,106

Uterine cancer

Because of estrogenic effects on the endometrium, tamoxifen is associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of uterine cancer in women ≥ 50 years old.104 Thus, the gynecologist plays a critical role in counseling and assessing patients with abnormal uterine/vaginal bleeding with tamoxifen therapy. Gynecologists should be aware of the limited role of ultrasound scans in tamoxifen users because of development of endometrial polyps and increased endometrial thickness.107 Screening with ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy have been shown to be low yield. However, if a patient experiences bleeding, the gynecologist readily should perform an evaluation with endometrial sampling.108 Although endometrial cancers are often diagnosed in the early stages, reports of aggressive histologic subtypes, which include sarcomas, have been reported.

Summary

As the number of cancer survivors grows, more patients with breast cancer will be transitioning (and doing so more rapidly) to primary care for all their needs, including gynecologic. In preface, we note the importance of identifying the risk for breast cancer for all gynecology patients. For patients who are returning after completing cancer therapies, gynecologists have a multifaceted role in their care.

First, the gynecologist should obtain personal and family histories to identify the patients who are at high risk for hereditary breast cancer if that has not already been done. This will insure timely interventions, if needed, to reduce cancer risk. Second, management of menopausal symptoms is needed commonly, but assessment for uterine bleeding with tamoxifen use may be necessary as well. Gynecologists may need to be alert to psychologic, social, and sexual difficulties, which are likely for at least 20% of returning patients. Last, continued surveillance for breast cancer, routine health maintenance, and promotion of wellness are integral to comprehensive care for the survivor of breast cancer.

Acknowledgments

Supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (2KO5 CA098133).

Footnotes

The authors report no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Can J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease: ten-year follow-up from the nurses’ health study. N Engl J Med. 199;325:756–762. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109123251102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, Inc; 2010. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National Cancer Institute. [Accessed Sept. 9, 2011];Stat bite: Number of cancer survivors by site. 2003 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj435. Available at: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/prevalence.html#susrvivor. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Erickson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Buuinooge BA, Goldstein M. Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3:79–86. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0723601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patlak M, Levit L. Ensuring quality cancer care through the oncology workforce: Institute of Medicine, National Cancer Policy Forum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mao JJ, Bowan MA, Stricker CT, et al. Delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: the perspective of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:933–938. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1447–1451. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, et al. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buzaglo J. Summary report: cancer survivor registry: the Breast Cancer MAP (mind affects the physical) project. Philadelphia, PA: Cancer Support Community; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Foulkes WD. Inherited susceptibility to common cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;13:2143–2153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0802968. 359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins: Gynecology; ACOG Committee on Genetics; Society of Gynecologic Oncologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 103: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:957–966. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a106d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daly MB, Axilbund JE, Buys S, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/ familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:562–594. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, et al. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA. 1997;277:997–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1331–1337. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: prevention and observation of surgical endpoints study group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1616–1622. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, et al. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1609–1615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–975. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, et al. Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy inBRCA1 and BRCA2 mutationcarriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:223–229. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70585-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lu KH, Kauff ND. Does a BRCA mutation plus tamoxifen equal a hysterectomy? Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:3–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, et al. Breast cancer: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7:122–192. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Venn A, Watson L, Bruinsma F, Giles G, Healy D. Risk of cancer after use of fertility drugs with in-vitro fertilization. Lancet. 1999;354:1586–1590. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.DiSaia PJ, Brewster WR, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Breast cancer survival and hormone replacement therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23:541–545. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200012000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Col NF, Kim JA, Chlebowski RT. Menopausal hormone therapy after breast cancer: a meta-analysis and critical appraisal of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:535–540. doi: 10.1186/bcr1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet. 2003;362:419–427. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14065-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Holmberg L, Anderson H for the HABITS steering and data monitoring committees. HABITS (hormonal replacement therapy after breast cancer-is it safe?), a randomized comparison: trial stopped. Lancet. 2004;363:453–455. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15493-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Holmberg L, Iversen O-E, Rudenstam CM, et al. Increased risk of recurrence after hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:475–482. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Von Schoultz E Rutqvist LE on behalf of the Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group. Menopausal hormone therapy after breast cancer: the Stockholm randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:533–535. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loprinzi CL, Michalak JC, Quella SK, et al. Megestrol acetate for the prevention of hot flashes. N Engl J Med. 1994;12:155–158. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Women’s Health Care Physicians. Breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(suppl 4):11S–16S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000138803.56286.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pachman DR, Jones JM, Loprinzi CL. Management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: current treatment options, challenges and future directions. Int J Womens Health. 2010;9:123–135. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s7721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Loprinzi CL, Pisansky TM, Fonseca R, et al. Pilot evaluation of venlafaxine hydrochloride for the therapy of hot flashes in cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2377–2381. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sideras K, Ingle JN, Ames MM, et al. Coprescription of tamoxifen and medications that inhibit CYP2D6. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2768–2776. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thacker HL. Assessing risks and benefits of nonhormonal treatments for vasomotor symptoms in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Womens Health. 2011;20:1007–1016. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goldberg RM, Loprinzi CL, O’Fallon JR, et al. Transdermal clonidine for ameliorating tamoxifen-induced hot flashes. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:155–158. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reddy SY, Warner H, Guttuso T, Jr, et al. Gabapentin, estrogen, and placebo for treating hot flushes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:41–48. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000222383.43913.ed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Geller SE, Shulman LP, van Breemen RB, et al. Safety and efficacy of black cohosh and red clover for the management of vasomotor symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2009;16:1156–1166. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ace49b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Messina M, McCaskill-Stevens W, Lampe JW. Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1275–1284. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dorval M, Maunsell E, Taylor-Brown J, Kilpatrick M. Marital stability after breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:54–59. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paskett E, Alfano CM, Davidson MA, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ health-related quality of life: racial differences and comparisons to non-cancer controls. Cancer. 2008;11:3222–3230. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kessler R. Depression is a timely topic. Comp Health Prac Rev. 2003;8:6–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stark D, Kiely M, Smith A, Velikova G, House A, Selby P. Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3137–3148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shelby RA, Golden-Kreutz DM, Andersen BL. PTSD diagnoses, subsyndromal symptoms, and comorbidities contribute to impairments for breast cancer survivors. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21:165–172. doi: 10.1002/jts.20316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Evans DL, Staab JP, Petitto JM, et al. Depression in the medical setting: biopsychological interactions and treatment considerations. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:40–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Keller MB, McCullough JP, Klein DN, et al. A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1462–1470. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McDonald MV, Passik SD, Dugan W, Rosenfeld B, Theobald DE, Edgerton S. Nurses’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:593–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Bonaventura A. How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect their patients’ reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer. 1998;83:1640–1651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ashbury FD, Madlensky L, Raich P, et al. Antidepressant prescribing in community cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:278–285. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0446-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sharpe M, Strong V, Allen K, et al. Major depression in outpatients attending a regional cancer centre: screening and unmet treatment needs. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:314–320. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang PS, Simon G, Kessler RC. The economic burden of depression and the cost-effectiveness of treatment. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12:22–33. doi: 10.1002/mpr.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dausch BM, Compas BE, Beckjord E, et al. Rates and correlates of DSM-IV diagnoses in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2004;11:159–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schwartz L, Drotar D. Posttraumatic stress and related impairment in survivors of childhood cancer in early adulthood compared to healthy peers. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31:356–366. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sadler IJ, Jacobsen PB, Booth-Jones M, Belanger H, Weitzner MA, Fields KK. Preliminary evaluation of a clinical syndrome approach to assessing cancer-related fatigue. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23:406–416. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00388-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Smith EM, Gomm SA, Dickens CM. Assessing the independent contribution to quality of life from anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2003;17:509–513. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm781oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L. Assessment of anxiety and depression in advanced cancer patients and their relationship with quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1825–1833. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4324-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Deshields T, Tibbs T, Fan MY, Taylor M. Differences in patterns of depression after treatment for breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:398–406. doi: 10.1002/pon.962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peters L, Sellick K. Quality of life of cancer patients receiving inpatient and home-based palliative care. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:524–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03754.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, et al. Quality of life, depression, and stress in breast cancer women outpatients receiving active therapy in Taiwan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60:147–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Carver CS, Antoni MH. Finding benefit in breast cancer during the year after diagnosis predicts better adjustment 5 to 8 years after diagnosis. Health Psychol. 2004;23:595–598. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Simonelli LE, Fowler J, Maxwell GL, Andersen BL. Physical sequelae and depressive symptoms in gynecologic cancer survivors: meaning in life as a mediator. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:275–284. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9029-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, et al. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:375–390. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shelby RA, Golden-Kreutz DM, Andersen BL. PTSD diagnoses, subsyndromal symptoms, and comorbidities contribute to impairments for breast cancer survivors. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21:165–172. doi: 10.1002/jts.20316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Satin JR, Linden W, Phillips MJ. Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2009;115:5349–5361. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pinquart M, Duberstein PR. Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2010;40:1797–1810. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hjerl K, Andersen EW, Keiding N, Mouridsen HT, Mortensen PB, Jørgensen T. Depression as a prognostic factor for breast cancer mortality. Psychosomatics. 2003;44:24–30. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.44.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Giese-Davis J, Collie K, Rancourt KM, Neri E, Kraemer HC, Spiegel D. Decrease in depression symptoms is associated with longer survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a secondary analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:413–420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.4455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Williams SB, O’Connor EA, Eder M, Whitlock EP. Screening for child and adolescent depression in primary care settings: a systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e716–e735. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pignone MP, Gaynes BN, Rushton JL, et al. Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:765–776. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sharp LK, Lipsky MS. Screening for depression across the lifespan: a review of measures for use in primary care settings. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:1001–1008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Carlson LE, Groff SL, Maciejewski O, Bultz BD. Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4884–4891. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Delgado PL, Zarkowski P. Treatment of mood disorders. In: Panksepp J, editor. Textbook of biological psychiatry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Lis Inc; 2004. pp. 231–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Marangell LB. Augmentation of standard depression therapy. Clin Ther. 2000;22:A25–A38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ng CG, Boks MP, Zainal NZ, de Wit NJ. The prevalence and pharmacotherapy of depression in cancer patients. J Affect Disord. 2011;131:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rodin G, Katz M, Lloyd N, Green E, Mackay JA, Wong RK. Treatment of depression in cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2007;14:180–188. doi: 10.3747/co.2007.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Costa D, Mogos I, Toma T. Efficacy and safety of mianserin in the treatment of depression of women with cancer. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1985;320:85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb08081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.van Heeringen K, Zivkov M. Pharmacological treatment of depression in cancer patients: a placebo-controlled study of mianserin. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169:440–443. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.4.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, et al. Differential effects of paroxetine on fatigue and depression: a randomized, double-blind trial from the University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4635–4641. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, et al. Effect of paroxetine hydrocholoride (Paxil) on fatigue and depression in breaset cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89:243–249. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-2175-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Musselman DL, Somerset WI, Guo Y, et al. A double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study of paroxetine, desipramine, or placebo in breast cancer patients (stages I, II, III, and IV) with major depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:288–296. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Carpenter JS, Storniolo AM, Johns S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials of venlafaxine for hot flashes after breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12:124–135. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ, Shelton RC, et al. Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:417–422. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Brothers B, Yang HC, Strunk D, Andersen BL. Cancer patients with major depressive disorder: testing a biobehavioral/cognitive behavioral intervention. J Consult Clin Psych. 2011;79:253–260. doi: 10.1037/a0022566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Frierson GM, Andersen BL. The psychological aspects of cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. In: Sarwer D, Pruzinsky T, Cash T, Persing J, Whitaker L, editors. Breast reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkens; 2006. pp. 173–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:697–709. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.68.4.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Andersen BL. In sickness and in health: maintaining intimacy following breast cancer recurrence. Cancer J. 2009;15:70–73. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318198c742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Van’t Spijker A, Trijsburg RW, Duiven-voorden HJ. Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: a meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med. 1997;59:280–293. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199705000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Andersen BL, Carpenter KM, Yang HC, Shapiro CL. Sexual well-being among partnered women with breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3151–317. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Frierson GM, Thiel DL, Andersen BL. Body change stress for women with breast cancer: the Breast-Impact of Treatment Scale. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32:77–81. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3201_9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Krychman ML, Pereira L, Carter J, Amsterdam A. Sexual oncology: sexual health issues in women with cancer. Oncology. 2006;71:18–25. doi: 10.1159/000100521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Thornton LM, Carson WE, III, Shapiro CL, Farrar WB, Andersen BL. Delayed emotional recovery after taxane-based chemotherapy. Cancer. 2008;113:638–647. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Grady D. Management of menopausal symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2338–2347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp054015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.SGO Breast Cancer Task Force. Orr J, Jr, Kelley J, 3rd, et al. Society of Gynecologic On- cologists position paper: breast cancer care. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bachmann G. Estradiol-releasing vaginal ring delivery system for urogenital atrophy: experience over the past decade. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:991–998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kendall A, Dowsett M, Folkerd E, Smith I. Caution: vaginal estradiol appears to be contraindicated in postmenopausal women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:584–587. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pfeiler G, Glatz C, Konigsberg R, et al. Vaginal estriol to overcome side-effects of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients. Climacteric. 2011;14:339–344. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2010.529967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Beach SR, Fincham FD, Katz J. Marital therapy in the treatment of depression: toward a third generation of therapy and research. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18:635–661. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mead DE. Marital distress, co-occurring depression, and marital therapy: a review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2002;28:299–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb01188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Saxbe DE, Repetti RL, Nishina A. Marital satisfaction, recovery from work, and diurnal cortisol among men and women. Health Psychol. 2008;27:15–25. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:1–30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yang HC, Schuler TA. Marital quality and survivorship: slowed recovery for breast cancer patients in distressed relationships. Cancer. 2009;115:217–228. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mclauglin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: patient perceptions and precautionary behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5213–529. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569–575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371–188. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ettinger B, Black D, Mitlak B, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with ralox-ifene: results form a 3 year randomized clinical trial. 1999;282:637–645. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al. Randomized trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet. 1996;348:1535–1541. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fisher B, Constantino JP, Redmond CK, et al. Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients: findings from the National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP) B-14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:527–537. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.7.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hann LE, Gess CS, Bach Am, et al. Endometrial thickness in tamoxifen treated patients: correlation with clinical and pathologic findings. AMJ Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:657–661. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES