Skip to main content
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI logoLink to Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI
. 2013 Aug;20(8):1150–1154. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00243-13

Development of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Ringworm Infection in Cattle

Elena Tatiana Băguţ a,b, Ludivine Cambier b, Marie-Pierre Heinen b, Vasile Cozma a, Michel Monod c, Bernard Mignon b,
PMCID: PMC3754514  PMID: 23740921

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the serological diagnosis of ringworm infection in cattle. We used available recombinant forms of Trichophyton rubrum dipeptidyl peptidase V (TruDppV) and T. rubrum leucin aminopeptidase 2 (TruLap2), which are 98% identical to Trichophyton verrucosum orthologues. Field serum samples from 135 cattle with ringworm infection, as confirmed by direct microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and PCR, and from 55 cattle without any apparent skin lesions or history of ringworm infection that served as negative controls were used. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were determined to evaluate the diagnostic value of our ELISA. Overall, the ELISAs based on recombinant TruDppV and TruLap2 discriminated well between infected animals and healthy controls. Highly significant differences (P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) were noted between optical density values obtained when sera from infected versus control cattle were tested. The ELISA developed for the detection of specific antibodies against DppV gave 89.6% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, a 96.8% positive predictive value, and a 78.4% negative predictive value. The recombinant TruLap2-based ELISA displayed 88.1% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity, a 95.9% positive predictive value, and a 75.7% negative predictive value. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ELISA based on recombinant antigens for assessing immune responses to ringworm infection in cattle; it is particularly suitable for epidemiological studies and also for the evaluation of vaccines and/or vaccination procedures.

INTRODUCTION

The zoophilic dermatophyte Trichophyton verrucosum is the most common agent of dermatophytosis (commonly known as ringworm infection) in cattle, which represent its natural reservoir (1). Although T. verrucosum has been reported to be one of the most important morbidity factors in calves, there have also been reports of infections in sheep, goats, and horses (2). Ringworm infection in cattle has received particular attention due to not only its contagiousness among animal communities but also its zoonotic transmission to humans (3).

To date, there have been few studies devoted to assessing the immune responses to ringworm infection in cattle. Both antibody- and cell-mediated immune responses have been found in cattle after experimental infection (4) or vaccination (5, 6). Although one study in experimentally infected calves indicated that a combination of cell-mediated and humoral immune responses is associated with T. verrucosum immunity and clearance of the infection (4), the antidermatophyte antibody response is commonly considered not to be protective (79). In another study, vaccinated cows developed immunity which was not transferred to their progeny (10). The production of specific antibodies has also been detected in domestic carnivores (1114), guinea pigs (15), rabbits (16), and humans (17, 18), and their potential use for monitoring dermatophyte infections has been demonstrated. The development of an antibody response as a consequence of dermatophyte infection offers the possibility of using serological diagnosis as a screening method for detection of the infection. To our knowledge, several enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been developed for the evaluation of antibody responses in animal dermatophytosis, but only a few focused on detecting specific antibodies in cattle infected with T. verrucosum. For these reasons, the aim of this study was to develop an in-house ELISA based on two available Trichophyton rubrum (Tru) recombinant antigens consisting of secreted exopeptidases, dipeptidyl peptidase V (DppV) and leucin aminopeptidase 2 (Lap2), for serological diagnosis of ringworm infection in cattle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and sera.

Between January and April 2010, 135 beef and dairy cattle with suspected ringworm infection, from intensive breeding systems in Romania and ranging in age from 3 months to 3 years, underwent clinical examination. To confirm the infection, samples consisting of scales and hairs were collected by skin scraping. A part of each sample was analyzed using lactophenol followed by direct microscopic examination and with 20% KOH associated with calcofluor white (fluorescent brightener 28, F3543; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) followed by fluorescence microscopy (19). The remainder of the sample was tested in parallel by PCR using primers reported in the literature as specific for fungi belonging to the genus Trichophyton (20), i.e., Trich302for (5′-TTG CTA AAC GCT CAG ACT GAC AGC-3′) and Trich302rev (5′-CGG AAG GAT CAT TAA CGC GCA GGC C-3′) (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Evidence of fungal infection was found in all 135 samples according to the methods employed.

Under the national program for surveillance, control, and eradication of animal diseases in Romania, blood samples were collected by jugular vein puncture. The serum samples were separated by centrifugation and stored at −20°C until they were assayed. The 135 serum samples from cattle with confirmed ringworm infection were referred to as “positive sera” (group A, n = 135). The control “negative sera” (group B, n = 55) consisted of 55 serum samples collected from beef and dairy cattle from an intensive breeding system in Belgium, with ages ranging from 3 months to 3 years, without any apparent skin lesions or history of ringworm infection. These animals were examined by a veterinarian and considered clinically healthy.

All activities were performed according to European Welfare Legislation (directive 2010/63/EU).

Antigens.

Although several secreted proteases from dermatophytes have been obtained as recombinant proteins, no T. verrucosum-secreted proteases are currently available in recombinant form. In spite of their different ecologies, the genome of T. rubrum (21) proved to be most closely related to the genomes of T. verrucosum and Arthroderma benhamiae, two phylogenetically closely related dermatophytes that induce highly inflammatory cutaneous infections in humans (22, 23). In addition, most Trichophyton species revealed similar secreted protein profiles (24). For these reasons, recombinant TruDppV and TruLap2, which have already been characterized (25), were selected for use as coating antigens in this assay.

The T. rubrum antigens were produced as recombinant proteins using the Pichia pastoris expression system with the GS115 strain (25). Briefly, the culture supernatant was separated from the cells by centrifugation (10 min at 1,500 × g), concentrated by ultrafiltration using an Amicon cell (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and a filtration membrane with a size threshold of 30 kDa, and then dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). All procedures were carried out at 4°C. The protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay (26). The clear supernatants were analyzed by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions, and the presence of each recombinant protein was confirmed by visualization as a single individual protein band. The P. pastoris supernatants were stored at −20°C until use.

The nontransformed P. pastoris strain GS115, which did not secrete any DppV or Lap2 activities into the culture medium, was grown under the same conditions described above, and the culture supernatant, also prepared as described above, was used as a control.

ELISAs.

Initially, checkerboard titrations were performed to optimize the required concentrations of the coating antigens, primary antibody, and conjugate (data not shown). Polystyrene microtiter 96-well plates (Microlon 600; Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmuenster, Austria) were coated with 100 μl/well of 10 μg/ml antigen solution in PBS (pH 7.2) as a coating buffer and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Odd rows of the plates were sensitized with the antigen, while even rows were coated with P. pastoris GS115 supernatant as control wells. After being washed with PBS, unoccupied protein-binding sites were blocked by the addition of 200 μl/well of a 3.6% solution of casein hydrolysate (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) for 1 h at 37°C. According to the linear range of the dilution curves of the ELISAs, triplicate serum samples were diluted 1:500 in PBS-T, and 50 μl of each was added over 1 h at 37°C to both the antigen-coated and control wells. After being washed with PBS-T, 50 μl of peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-cow immunoglobulin G (IgG) (polyclonal anti-cow immunoglobulins/horseradish peroxidase [HRP]; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), diluted 1:1,000, was added to each well. After a further 1-h incubation at 37°C and 3 subsequent washes with PBS-T, the peroxidase activity was revealed by the addition of 100 μl of a solution containing tetramethylbenzidine and hydrogen peroxide. The reaction was stopped after 5 min by adding 100 μl of 1 N phosphoric acid, and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured directly with a Multiskan RC spectrophotometer (Thermo Labsystems, Vantaa, Finland). On each ELISA plate, a positive reference consisting of serum from one 6-month-old calf with extensive ringworm lesions, two negative references consisting of serum from one 6-month-old calf without evidence or history of ringworm infection and fetal calf serum (Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) diluted 1:500, and wells without added sera as reaction blanks were processed alongside the samples in triplicate.

Assay evaluation.

Optical density (OD) was defined as the difference between the mean absorbance for each triplicate serum sample tested and the control wells. The cutoff was obtained as the mean OD + 2 times the standard deviation (SD) of sera from group B. All sera (from groups A and B) were classified as true positive (TP) (sera from group A that presented OD values above the cutoff in the serological test), false positive (FP) (sera from group B that presented OD values above the cutoff in the serological test), true negative (TN) (sera from group B that presented OD values below the cutoff in the serological test), and false negative (FN) (sera from group A that presented OD values below the cutoff in the serological test). Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were obtained using the following formulas: sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN), specificity = TN/(TN + FP), positive predictive value = TP/(TP + FP), and negative predictive value = TN/(TN + FN).

The Mann-Whitney nonparametric U test was used for statistical comparison of OD results obtained from sera from infected animals versus those from the control group, with significance defined as a P value of <0.0001.

RESULTS

In this study, we developed an in-house ELISA for the serodiagnosis of ringworm infection in cattle based on the available recombinant peptidases TruDppV and TruLap2, produced using the P. pastoris expression system, because BLAST analysis revealed that TruDppV and TruLap2 are 98% identical and 99% similar to T. verrucosum orthologues (27). DppV was used because Aspergillus fumigatus DppV has been identified as a major antigen with great potential in the serodiagnosis of aspergillosis (28, 29). Lap2 was also tested because it is the major peptidase secreted by various dermatophyte species during in vitro growth in the presence of keratin (25), the principal component of host structures preferentially colonized by dermatophytes, i.e., stratum corneum, nails, claws, and hair. The levels of specific antibodies were measured in field serum samples from cattle with confirmed ringworm infection (group A, n = 135) and healthy control animals (group B, n = 55) (Fig. 1). A highly significant difference (P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) was noted in the OD values between group A and group B.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Distribution of optical density (OD) values obtained from the sera of cattle with confirmed ringworm infection (group A) and healthy control cattle (group B) using the recombinant proteases Trichophyton rubrum DppV (TruDppV) and Lap2 (TruLap2) as coating antigens. For the TruDppV-based ELISA, the mean ODs of sera from groups A and B were 0.791 ± 0.32 and 0.173 ± 0.089, respectively, and the cutoff value obtained as the mean OD + 2SD of sera from group B was 0.353. For the TruLap2-based ELISA, the mean ODs of sera from groups A and B were 0.994 ± 0.511 and 0.157 ± 0.085, respectively, while the cutoff point was fixed at 0.327 as described above. With both antigens, a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) was noted between OD values obtained when sera from group A versus those from group B were tested. Details about sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values are given in Results. The horizontal bars represent the mean ODs, and the dashed bars represent the cutoff.

In total, 190 serum samples were first assessed by recombinant TruDppV-based ELISAs employing the protocol described above. The sera from group B assessed using recombinant TruDppV gave OD values ranging from 0.023 to 0.413. The cutoff value, determined as the mean OD + 2SD of these sera, was fixed at 0.353. The mean OD of sera from group B was 0.173 ± 0.089. Of the serum samples from group B, 51/55 (92.7%) had ODs below the cutoff value (Fig. 1), indicating the absence of specific antibodies in the vast majority of the healthy animals. Among cattle from group A, 121/135 (89.6%) had OD values above the cutoff point (Fig. 1), indicating detection of specific antibodies against DppV in individuals in which ringworm infection had been confirmed. The mean OD of sera from group A was 0.791 ± 0.32. A cutoff value of 0.353 gave 89.6% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, a 96.8% positive predictive value, and a 78.4% negative predictive value. It is well known that higher cutoff values increase the specificity of a test but reduce its diagnostic sensitivity and might lead to false-negative results. As a compromise, a cutoff value of 0.442, determined as the mean OD + 3SD, for the recombinant TruDppV-based ELISA displayed 86.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, a 100% positive predictive value, and a 75.3% negative predictive value. Thus, the sensitivities and negative predictive values of the test were reduced while the specificities and positive predictive values were maximized.

In parallel, the sera from groups A and B were assessed by the recombinant TruLap2-based ELISA. The sera from group B showed OD values ranging from 0.08 to 0.433. The mean OD + 2SD for these sera was 0.327, which represented the cutoff value. Among the cattle from group B, 50/55 (90.9%) had OD values below the cutoff point (Fig. 1), indicating the absence of specific antibodies in most noninfected animals. The mean OD of these sera was 0.157 ± 0.085. Of the naturally infected group A cattle, 119/135 (88.1%) had OD values above the cutoff point (Fig. 1), confirming the presence of specific antibodies against Lap2 in the sera of most cattle naturally infected with ringworm. The mean OD value was 0.994 ± 0.511. The 14 FN and 4 FP serum samples obtained when recombinant TruDppV was used were among the 16 FN and 5 FP sera identified when recombinant TruLap2 was used. A cutoff value of 0.327 resulted in 88.1% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity, a 95.9% positive predictive value, and a 75.7% negative predictive value. By increasing the cutoff value to 0.412 (as the mean OD + 3SD of sera from group B), the specificity and positive predictive value of the test were improved to 96.3% and 98.3%, respectively, and the sensitivity was slightly reduced to 87.4%, while the negative predictive value remained unchanged.

To rule out laboratory errors, sera classified as either FP or FN were retested under the same conditions and confirmed to yield the same results.

DISCUSSION

Assessment of dermatophyte antibodies is routinely performed by ELISAs, especially when large numbers of samples need to be examined. The in vitro production of recombinant antigens is an inexpensive and fast method for obtaining proteins of high and constant quality, bypassing the time-consuming in vitro culture and further purification steps necessary to achieve sufficient native antigens. Using an in-house ELISA based on the T. rubrum recombinant exoproteases DppV and Lap2, we confirmed the presence of specific antibodies in the sera of cattle naturally infected with ringworm. The test discriminated well between infected animals and healthy controls, with good intrinsic validity when either recombinant TruDppV (89.6% sensitivity and 92.7% specificity) or recombinant TruLap2 (88.1% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity) was used. Serological reactivity in the noninfected control group (group B) was observed in only a minority of animals, with most of them reacting to both TruDppV and TruLap2. This might reflect a previous nonreported asymptomatic infection with T. verrucosum or other dermatophyte species, as there is evidence for interspecies and intergeneric cross-reactions (30). Exposure to environmental nondermatophyte fungal antigens might also be the source of the cross-reactions, as cattle stables are environments with high levels of exposure to such antigens. Cross-reactions with other mucosal and/or skin fungal commensal organisms such as Candida albicans and Malassezia pachydermatis were also not totally excluded, even if they have been reported for neither cattle nor other animal dermatophytoses (11).

In spite of confirmed infections, several serum samples from group A had levels of antibodies below the cutoff point. A window exists between the onset of infection and seroconversion during dermatophytosis. Therefore, sampling of serologically negative cattle with clinical lesions might have occurred, especially because IgM, the first Ig to appear in response to initial fungal exposure, was not detected with the in-house ELISA that we developed. With regard to the cattle in group A for which the ELISA results were positive, it is not clear if antibodies were produced before or after the onset of clinical lesions. In calves experimentally infected with T. verrucosum, specific antibodies appeared between days 33 and 55 postinfection (p.i.) (4). During experimental Microsporum canis infection, levels of specific IgG antibodies were detectable at different intervals after the lesions appeared, either at 14 to 21 days p.i. in dogs (11) or at 14 days p.i. in guinea pigs (15, 30). In M. canis-infected cats, specific IgG levels were high in some animals when the first lesions appeared and were high in others 4 weeks later (31).

To date, ELISAs have not yet been established for the serological diagnosis of ringworm infection in cattle. Conversely, serological assays for the detection of some invasive fungal infections are commercially available. Several ELISA kits have been developed for the detection of both circulating antibodies and antigens for the diagnosis of fungal infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus, which are major pathogens in immunocompromised individuals. The tests developed for the detection of mannan or galactomannan antigens revealed good specificities but variable sensitivities (32). The most data are available for the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen using the Platelia ELISA format. Although several studies indicated that this biomarker has good specificity for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis, the sensitivities have varied, ranging from 17% to 100% (33, 34).

The results obtained in the present study provide basic support for the postulate that the two T. rubrum exoproteases used as antigens are exposed to the immune system of the host during ringworm infection. The dermatophyte-secreted exoproteases (Dpps and Laps) interfere with compact keratinized tissue degradation after initial sulfitolysis (35) and endoprotease (subtilisins and fungalysins) digestion (36). So far, the expression of genes encoding the dermatophyte-secreted exoproteases DppV and Lap2 has been shown only in vitro in the presence of keratin (37). The general basis of the pathogenicity of dermatophytes is still far from being elucidated, but it is likely that DppV and Lap2 are secreted by dermatophytes at a late stage of infection during keratin degradation.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ELISA based on recombinant antigens for assessing the humoral immune response in cattle with ringworm infection. This assay may be valuable in screening large numbers of samples, making it particularly suitable not only for epidemiological studies but also for the evaluation of vaccines and/or vaccination procedures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grant 3.4558.10 from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale (FRSM, Belgium) and grant 594/2012 from the Executive Unit for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI, Romania). This publication was possible thanks to the agreement that binds Wallonia-Brussels (WBI) and Romania. E.T.B. was the recipient of a research grant provided by the University of Liège. L.C. is the recipient of a studentship from Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA), Brussels, Belgium.

We thank Claude Saegerman and Aline Baldo for useful discussions and Françoise Maréchal for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 5 June 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Papini R, Nardoni S, Fanelli A, Mancianti F. 2009. High infection rate of Trichophyton verrucosum in calves from central Italy. Zoonoses Public Health 56:59–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chermette R, Ferreiro L, Guillot J. 2008. Dermatophytoses in animals. Mycopathologia 166:385–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Seebacher C, Bouchara JP, Mignon B. 2008. Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Mycopathologia 166:335–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pier AC, Ellis JA, Mills KW. 1992. Development of immune response to experimental bovine Trichophyton verrucosum infection. Vet. Dermatol. 3:131–138 [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Elad D, Segal E. 1995. Immunogenicity in calves of a crude ribosomal fraction of Trichophyton verrucosum: a field trial. Vaccine 13:83–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Faldyna M, Oborilova E, Krejci J, Tesarik R, Krejci E, Pavlova B, Rybnikáø A. 2007. A correlation of in vitro tests for the immune response detection: a bovine trichophytosis model. Vaccine 25:7948–7954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Calderon RA, Hay RJ. 1984. Cell-mediated immunity in experimental murine dermatophytosis. II. Adoptive transfer of immunity to dermatophyte infection by lymphoid cells from donors with acute or chronic infections. Immunology 53:465–472 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Almeida SR. 2008. Immunology of dermatophytosis. Mycopathologia 166:277–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mignon B, Tabart J, Baldo A, Mathy A, Losson B, Vermout S. 2008. Immunization and dermatophytes. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 21:134–140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rybnikár̆ A, Chumela J, Vrzal V. 2001. Immunisation of pregnant cows against ringworm and its effect on the progeny. Acta Vet. Brno 70:421–423 [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pinter L, Noble WC, Ellis J, Ciclitira PJ. 1992. The value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serodiagnosis of canine dermatophytosis due to Microsporum canis. Vet. Dermatol. 3:65–70 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. DeBoer DJ, Moriello KA. 1993. Humoral and cellular immune responses to Microsporum canis in naturally occurring feline dermatophytosis. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 31:121–132 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mignon BR, Coignoul F, Leclipteux T, Focant C, Losson BJ. 1999. Histopathological pattern and humoral immune response to a crude exo-antigen and purified keratinase of Microsporum canis in symptomatic and asymptomatic infected cats. Med. Mycol. 37:1–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Peano A, Rambozzi L, Galo MG. 2005. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the serodiagnosis of canine dermatophytosis caused by Microsporum canis. Vet. Dermatol. 16:102–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mignon B, Leclipteux T, Focant C, Nikkels A, Pierard G, Losson B. 1999. Humoral and cellular immune response to a crude exo-antigen and purified keratinase of Microsporum canis in experimentally infected guinea pigs. Med. Mycol. 37:123–129 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zrimsek P, Kos J, Pinter L, Drobnic-Kosorok M. 1999. Detection by ELISA of the humoral immune response in rabbits naturally infected with Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Vet. Microbiol. 70:77–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Svejgaard E. 1986. Humoral antibody responses in the immunopathogenesis of dermatophytosis. Acta Derm. Venereol. Suppl. (Stockh.) 121:85–91 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Woodfolk JA. 2005. Allergy and dermatophytes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18:30–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Monod M, Baudraz-Rosselet F, Ramelet AA, Frenk E. 1989. Direct mycological examination in dermatology: a comparison of different methods. Dermatologica 179:183–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Brillowska-Dąbrowska A, Swierkowska A, Saunte DL, Arendrup MC. 2010. Diagnostic PCR tests for Microsporum audouinii, M. canis and Trichophyton infections. Med. Mycol. 48:486–490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Burmester A, Shelest E, Glöckner G, Heddergott C, Schindler S, Staib P, Heidel A, Felder M, Petzold A, Szafranski K, Feuermann M, Pedruzzi I, Priebe S, Groth M, Winkler R, Li W, Kniemeyer O, Schroeckh V, Hertweck C, Hube B, White TC, Platzer M, Guthke R, Heitman J, Wöstemeyer J, Zipfel PF, Monod M, Brakhage AA. 2011. Comparative and functional genomics provide insights into the pathogenicity of dermatophytic fungi. Genome Biol. 12:R7. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fumeaux J, Mock M, Ninet B, Jan I, Bontems O, Léchenne B, Lew D, Panizzon RG, Jousson O, Monod M. 2004. First report of Arthroderma benhamiae in Switzerland. Dermatology 208:244–250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Grunewald S, Paasch U, Gräser Y, Glander HJ, Simon JC, Nenoff P. 2006. Scarring tinea profunda in the pubic area due to Trichophyton verrucosum (in German). Hautarzt 57:811–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Giddey K, Favre B, Quadroni M, Monod M. 2007. Closely related dermatophyte species produce different patterns of secreted proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 267:95–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Monod M, Léchenne B, Jousson O, Grand D, Zaugg C, Stocklin R, Grouzmann E. 2005. Aminopeptidases and dipeptidyl-peptidases secreted by the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. Microbiology 151:145–155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Martinez DA, Oliver BG, Graser Y, Goldberg JM, Li W, Martinez-Rossi NM, Monod M, Shelest E, Barton RC, Birch E, Brakhage AA, Chen Z, Gurr SJ, Heiman D, Heitman J, Kosti I, Rossi A, Saif S, Samalova M, Saunders CW, Shea T, Summerbell RC, Xu J, Young S, Zeng Q, Birren BW, Cuomo CA, White TC. 2012. Comparative genome analysis of Trichophyton rubrum and related dermatophytes reveals candidate genes involved in infection. mBio 3:e00259–12. 10.1128/mBio.00259-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Biguet J, Tran Van Ky P, Fruit J, Andrieu S. 1967. Identification of chymotryptic activity in remarkable fractions of an antigenic extract of Aspergillus fumigatus. Significance for the immunologic diagnosis of aspergillosis (in French). Rev. Immunol. Ther. Antimicrob. 31:317–328 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sarfati J, Monod M, Recco P, Sulahian A, Pinel C, Candolfi E, Fontaine T, Debeaupuis JP, Tabouret M, Latgé JP. 2006. Recombinant antigens as diagnostic markers for aspergillosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 55:279–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pier AC, Hodges AB, Lauze JM, Raisbeck M. 1995. Experimental immunity to Microsporum canis and cross reactions with other dermatophytes of veterinary importance. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 33:93–97 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sparkes AH, Stokes CR, Grufydd-Jones TJ. 1995. Experimental Microsporum canis infection in cats: correlation between immunological and clinical observations. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 33:177–184 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Musher B, Fredricks D, Leisenring W, Balajee SA, Smith C, Marr KA. 2004. Aspergillus antigen enzyme immunoassay and quantitative PCR for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:5517–5522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Buchheidt D, Hummel M, Schleiermacher D, Spiess B, Schwerdtfeger R, Cornely OA, Wilhelm S, Reuter S, Kern W, Südhoff T, Mörz1 Hehlmann HR. 2004. Prospective clinical evaluation of a LightCycler-mediated polymerase chain reaction assay, a nested-PCR assay and a galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of IA in neutropenic cancer patients and haematological stem cell transplant recipients. Br. J. Haematol. 125:196–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Costa C, Costa JM, Desterke C, Botterel F, Cordonnier C, Bretagne S. 2002. Real-time PCR coupled with automated DNA extraction and detection of galactomannan antigen in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2224–2227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kunert J. 1972. Keratin decomposition by dermatophytes: evidence of the sulphitolysis of the protein. Experientia 28:1025–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Monod M. 2008. Secreted proteases from dermatophytes. Mycopathologia 166:285–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Staib P, Zaugg C, Mignon B, Weber J, Grumbt M, Pradervand S, Harshman K, Monod M. 2010. Differential gene expression in the pathogenic dermatophyte Arthroderma benhamiae in vitro versus during infection. Microbiology 156:884–895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES