Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2013 Aug;195(16):3672–3681. doi: 10.1128/JB.00473-13

The agr Locus Regulates Virulence and Colonization Genes in Clostridium difficile 027

Melissa J Martin a, Simon Clare b, David Goulding b, Alexandra Faulds-Pain a, Lars Barquist c,d, Hilary P Browne e, Laura Pettit b, Gordon Dougan b, Trevor D Lawley e, Brendan W Wren a,
PMCID: PMC3754575  PMID: 23772065

Abstract

The transcriptional regulator AgrA, a member of the LytTR family of proteins, plays a key role in controlling gene expression in some Gram-positive pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. AgrA is encoded by the agrACDB global regulatory locus, and orthologues are found within the genome of most Clostridium difficile isolates, including the epidemic lineage 027/BI/NAP1. Comparative RNA sequencing of the wild type and otherwise isogenic agrA null mutant derivatives of C. difficile R20291 revealed a network of approximately 75 differentially regulated transcripts at late exponential growth phase, including many genes associated with flagellar assembly and function, such as the major structural subunit, FliC. Other differentially regulated genes include several involved in bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) synthesis and toxin A expression. C. difficile 027 R20291 agrA mutant derivatives were poorly flagellated and exhibited reduced levels of colonization and relapses in the murine infection model. Thus, the agr locus likely plays a contributory role in the fitness and virulence potential of C. difficile strains in the 027/BI/NAP1 lineage.

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, anaerobic bacterium that is arguably the most frequent cause of antibiotic-associated colitis and health care-acquired diarrhea worldwide. Disease-causing isolates can produce two exotoxins, TcdA and TcdB, encoded by the 19-kb pathogenicity locus (PaLoc), which interact with the intestinal epithelium and potentially precipitate an acute inflammatory response and even cell death (13). Colonization of the intestine by toxigenic C. difficile can be asymptomatic, but following antibiotic treatment, a variety of symptoms, including diarrhea or life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis, can ensue (4). Relapsing disease occurs in up to 20% of patients following termination of treatment with certain first-line antimicrobials, such as vancomycin or metronidazole (5). The global increase in incidence and severity of C. difficile infection over the last decade is linked to the emergence of certain lineages, including the epidemic 027/BI/NAP1 variants (611). Transcontinental dissemination of the 027 variant occurred through at least two distinct fluoroquinolone-resistant lineages, with clinical outcomes resulting in longer colonization duration, increased toxin production, and increased relapse and mortality rates (6, 12, 13). This increased disease severity was typified by multiple outbreaks of C. difficile disease between 2003 and 2006, affecting over 300 patients at the Stoke Mandeville hospital, United Kingdom, from which the representative 027 strain, R20291, was isolated (14, 15).

Gene regulatory networks can enable pathogenic bacteria to rapidly adapt to their environment and modulate the expression of virulence-associated factors. So-called two-component systems (TCSs) can play a key role in linking environmental and internal sensing to the control of gene expression. Interestingly, genes with similarity to TCSs, transcriptional regulators, and signaling proteins comprise approximately 10% of C. difficile genomes, yet their contribution to the regulatory mechanisms and virulence within C. difficile are poorly understood (14, 16). The RolA/B TCS of C. difficile has been shown to negatively regulate the luxS gene and, consequently, the synthesis of the putative quorum-sensing signaling molecule, autoinducer 2 (AI-2) (1618). Other classes of regulators reported in C. difficile include the transcriptional regulators CcpA (19), CodY (20), and SigH (21), which influence the expression of the exotoxins, TcdA and TcdB, and Spo0A, which is a key regulator of sporulation and is important for persistence and transmission within the host (2224). Furthermore, the C. difficile flagellar regulon modulates toxin production in vitro (25) in addition to having a contributory role in adhesion and colonization in vivo (26).

Analysis of the genome sequence of the C. difficile 027 isolate R20291 identified a locus with similarity to the agr operon, which is a conserved determinant in many Gram-positive bacteria (14). In Staphylococcus aureus, the global regulation of virulence genes is coordinated by the agr quorum-sensing locus, agrACDB (2729). The agrD and agrB genes encode the precursor to the small secreted cyclic autoinducing peptide (AIP) and a transmembrane protein involved in processing and exporting of AIP, respectively. Extracellular accumulation of AIP activates a typical bacterial TCS by binding to AgrC, a sensor kinase, subsequently resulting in the phosphorylation of the AgrA response regulator. Phosphorylated AgrA binds to DNA via its C-terminal LytTR domain and can activate the transcription of both the RNAII (agrBDCA) transcript, creating a positive feedback loop, and the divergent RNAIII transcript encoding a regulatory RNA effector molecule (30, 31). The C. difficile agr locus carries the requisite genes for a functional agr operon, agrACDB. Interestingly, this complete locus is absent from the first reported C. difficile 630 genome, ribotype 012, and it was originally termed “agr2”. All analyzed C. difficile genomes contain the so-called agr1 locus, encoding a partial agr-like locus of agrDB (14).

Originally thought to be specific to 027, a comparative genomic hybridization study identified the complete agr locus, agrACDB, in other clinical isolates, suggesting that this locus is prevalent within the species (32). Here, we undertake further analysis of C. difficile R20291 to determine the network of genes under the regulatory control of the agr locus. We identify a number of characteristics, including flagellar biosynthesis, TcdA production, and bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) signaling proteins that are influenced by the agr locus and show that it has a contributory role for colonization in the C. difficile murine model of infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial growth conditions and strains.

All strains and plasmids used in this study are summarized in Table 1. C. difficile strains were routinely cultured at 37°C under anaerobic conditions (Mini-Mac 250; Don Whitley Scientific) using brain heart infusion (BHI; Oxoid) medium or Brazier's CCEY agar supplemented with 4% egg yolk (Bioconnections). Where appropriate, C. difficile agar was supplemented with d-cycloserine (250 μg · ml−1) and cefoxitin (8 μg · ml−1), 15 μg/ml thiamphenicol (Sigma), or 20 μg/ml lincomycin (Sigma). Escherichia coli strains were cultured aerobically at 37°C using Luria-Bertani (LB) media (Sigma). Where appropriate, media were supplemented with 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol (Alfa Aesar). Spore enumeration was performed by inoculating cultures 1:1 with 100% (vol/vol) ethanol for 1 h at room temperature to kill the vegetative cells. Total CFU were enumerated by serial dilution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and plating on BHI plates supplemented with 0.5% taurocholate (Sigma) to stimulate germination (33).

Table 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Characteristic(s) Source
C. difficile strains
    R20291 Epidemic PCR ribotype 027, Stoke Mandeville hospital outbreak, United Kingdom, 2005 14
    R20291 agrA R20291 agrA76a::CT This study
    R20291 agrA complement C. difficile R20291 agrA complemented with pMTL-84151-agrA This study
E. coli CA434 Conjugation donor for E. coli HB101 [F mcrB mrr hsdS20(rB mB) recA13 leuB6 ara-14 proA2 lacY1 galK2 xyl-5 mtl-1 rpsL20(Smr) glnV44 λ] containing plasmid R702 41
Plasmids
    pMTL007-CE2 ClosTron plasmid (ColE1, pCD6, catP) 37
    pMTL007-CE2-agrA76a pMTL007-CE2 derivative retargeted to agrA This study
    pMTL-84151 E. coli-C. difficile shuttle plasmid (pCD6, catP, ColE1+tra) 42
    pMTL-84151-agrA pMTL-84151 containing 0.768-kb agrA coding sequence and 0.372-kb putative upstream promoter region This study

Library preparation and genomic DNA sequencing.

Genomic C. difficile DNA was isolated as previously described (34). Paired-end multiplexed libraries were created as previously described (35), and the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform was used for whole-genome sequencing of C. difficile R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT. Sequencing reads were mapped to the R20291 genome (14) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (36).

Mutagenesis and genetic complementation studies.

The ClosTron system was used to insertionally inactivate the R20291 agrA gene as previously described (37, 38). Briefly, using the Perutka algorithm (39), plasmid pMTL007C-E2 was retargeted to the antisense strand of agrA between positions 76 and 77, and the resultant plasmid, pMTL007C-E2-agrA76a, was synthesized by DNA 2.0 (Menlo Park). This plasmid was conjugated into wild-type R20291 as previously described (40) using the electrocompetent E. coli CA434 donor strain (41). Transconjugants were selected on agar plates in the presence of thiamphenicol to select for the plasmid and cycloserine/cefoxitin to select against E. coli. ClosTron integrants then were isolated by their resistance to lincomycin, and loss of the plasmid was confirmed by sensitivity to thiamphenicol. Insertions in agrA were confirmed by PCR screening using the primers pairs agrA76a-Fw/agrA76a-Rv, agrA76a-R/EBS, and RAM-Fw/RAM-Rv and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. For complementation studies, the agrA coding sequence and putative promoter region, 372 bp upstream, was PCR amplified from wild-type R20291 template using oligonucleotides agrAcNdeI_Fw and agrAcHindIII_Rv and inserted into the modular vector pMTL84151 by restriction and ligation cloning into the NdeI/HindIII sites (42), creating the complementation vector pMTL-84151-agrA. The plasmid was confirmed by DNA sequencing, and pMTL-84151-agrA was conjugated into C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT as described previously (40).

RNA preparation and cDNA synthesis.

Bacterial cells were harvested in RNAprotect bacteria (Qiagen), and total RNA was extracted using the FastRNA Pro blue kit (MP Biomedical) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was eluted in nuclease-free water and quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Genomic DNA was removed using one treatment of Turbo DNase (Applied Biosystems), and PCR analyses using primer pairs that amplified housekeeping genes dxr, sigA1, and sigB were performed to confirm DNA depletion. Equal amounts of total DNA-free RNA (5 μg) were reverse transcribed using random hexamer primers (Invitrogen) and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized in the presence of actinomycin D to prevent spurious second-strand cDNA synthesis, which inhibits DNA-dependent DNA synthesis (43).

cDNA sequencing and expression profiling.

cDNA sequencing was performed using an Illumina HiSeq platform from 150- to 250-bp multiplexed cDNA libraries. Seventy-five cycles of paired-end sequencing from approximately 169 million cDNAs yielded 12,786 Mb of sequencing data and 15 to 45 million reads per library (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). cDNA sequence reads were aligned to the C. difficile R20291 genome reference (14) using BWA with a quality parameter (−q) of 15, resulting in 76 to 82% of total reads aligned per library. Reads were mapped to annotated coding sequences (CDSs) and intergenic regions to account for possible unannotated noncoding RNAs. Raw read counts were calculated per nucleotide for each gene and intergenic region from three biological replicates of wild-type R20291 and the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant. Differential expression analyses were performed using R version 2.15.0 and the DESeq statistical analysis package (44). P values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, and a q value threshold of 0.1 was used to define differentially regulated genes with an expected false discovery rate of <10% (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

Relative expression levels of target transcripts were determined using Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Invitrogen) by following the manufacturer's protocol. Specific primer pairs for tcdA, fliC, CDR20291_1514 (KEGG accession number) and the rpoA internal control were designed using Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu). RNA from three biological replicates, independent of the RNA-seq samples, was prepared from R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT isolated from late exponential growth phase. Comparative threshold cycle (CT) analysis was performed, and the mean expression from three biological replicates and three replicates of each for target transcripts was calculated (45). Mean CT values were normalized to the internal control housekeeping gene, rpoA. Relative mRNA expression was represented by fold change (see Fig. 3).

Oligonucleotides.

The complete list of oligonucleotides used in this study is provided in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

Bioinformatics.

Multiple sequence alignments were created using ClustalW2 (46, 47).

TEM.

Negative staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were performed to visualize C. difficile flagella. R20291, R20291 agrA76a::CT, and agrA complement strains were grown under the same conditions as samples prepared for RNA processing and TcdA quantification. Cultured colonies were mixed with distilled water to create a slightly turbid suspension and applied to Formvar/carbon-coated EM grids. An equal volume of 3% ammonium molybdate with 1% trehalose was added to negative stain. Images were taken on an FEI Spirit Biotwin 120-kV TEM with a Tietz F415 charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera.

TcdA quantification.

C. difficile cultures were grown in BHI broth with shaking to late exponential phase, and culture supernatants were removed. TcdA quantification was performed by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described (23). CFU were determined to ensure equal numbers of vegetative cells in all samples and replicates.

CI experiments.

The C. difficile murine model of infection was used to perform competitive index (CI) experiments as previously described (23). Wild-type C57BL/6 mice (n = 5) were infected with 5 × 106 spores via gavage in 0.2 ml PBS. Equal amounts of spores from the parental R20291 and isogenic R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant derivative were used. Fecal samples were collected and enumerated by plating on C. difficile CCYE agar, with and without lincomycin, and incubated for 48 h. Agar supplemented with lincomycin selected for the knockout containing the ermB cassette. The CI number was determined using the following ratio: (R20291 agrA76a::CT/R20291 wild-type)output/(R20291 agrA76a::CT/R20291 wild-type)input. Statistical testing was performed using the Mann-Whitney test applied to log10 values of the CI ratios. All animal infections were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986.

RNA-seq data accession number.

RNA-seq data generated in this work are available online at ArrayExpress under accession number E-ERAD-97.

RESULTS

The distribution of the C. difficile agr locus.

It has previously been shown that the agr locus is absent from some C. difficile isolates (14, 32). To better understand the prevalence of agr within the C. difficile species, we carried out comparative genomic analysis to determine its distribution within sequenced and fully annotated C. difficile isolates (Table 2) (14, 48). This revealed that the agr locus is not limited to the ribotype 027 strains but is present in multiple disease-causing C. difficile lineages, including PCR ribotypes 001 and 017.

Table 2.

Distribution of agr locus in fully annotated C. difficile genomes

Strain and presence of agr locus Ribotype Source Year and source of origin Reference Accession no.
agr locus positive
    BI-9 001 Human 2001, United States 48 FN668944
    M68 017 Human 2006, Ireland 48 FN668375
    CF5 017 Human 1995, Belgium 48 FN665652
    BI-1 027 Human 1988, United States 48 NC_017179
    2007855 027 Bovine 2007, United States 48 FN665654
    R20291 027 Human 2006, United Kingdom 14 NC_013316
    CD196 027 Human 1985, France 14 NC_013315
agr locus negative
    630 012 Human 1982, Switzerland 16 AM180355
    M120 078 Human 2007, United Kingdom 48 FN665653

Analysis of the genome of C. difficile R20291 revealed that the agr locus included agrA, agrC, agrD, and agrB, respectively (14). Interestingly, in the S. aureus agr operon these genes are in the reverse order (agrBDCA) (Fig. 1a). The C. difficile R20291 agrA-encoded protein shares 28% amino acid identity with the equivalent S. aureus AgrA and contains both a predicted N-terminal REC signal receiver domain and C-terminal LytTR-DNA binding domain (Fig. 1b). The C. difficile R20291 agrC-encoded protein and agrB-encoded proteins share 23 and 25% amino acid identity, respectively, with the equivalent S. aureus orthologues. The putative 46-amino-acid C. difficile R20291 AgrD polypeptide shares no significant similarity with S. aureus. This is consistent with the highly variable nature of this peptide observed among S. aureus isolates (49). A RNAIII divergent transcript has not been identified in C. difficile.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Genetic organization of the C. difficile 027 agr locus. (a) The complete R20291 agr locus (upper panel) compared to the agr locus of S. aureus. Arrows indicate genes and direction of transcription. The length of each protein is indicated above (aa, amino acids), and the percent identity to the respective S. aureus orthologue is indicated below. The location of the group II intron target site, according to the ClosTron delivery system, used to construct the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant strain is shown. (b) ClustalW2 multiple sequence alignment of AgrA from C. difficile and S. aureus. Symbols: *, identical amino acids; :, strongly similar; ., weakly similar. AgrA shares 28% amino acid identities, as determined by BLAST search. The two domains of AgrA are outlined: 5′ REC signal receiver domain, green box; 3′ LytTR-DNA binding domain, red box. The structure of the S. aureus AgrA LytTR-DNA binding domain (residues 137 to 238) is indicated (72). The secondary structure is indicated: helices, blue bars; strands, black bars.

To determine if the C. difficile R20291 agr region is transcribed when grown under standard laboratory conditions, RT-PCR analysis of R20291 was performed using primer pairs specific to the C. difficile R20291 agrACDB coding sequences. This confirmed that the full locus is expressed at exponential (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] = 0.3) and late exponential (OD600 = 0.7) phase in BHI media.

Insertional inactivation of C. difficile R20291 agrA.

To study the role of the agr locus in C. difficile R20291, an isogenic mutant of agrA was constructed using the ClosTron system (37). The genotype of the C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant derivative was confirmed by PCR analysis exploiting specific primers (data not shown). Illumina sequencing of whole-genome DNA purified from the C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant derivative revealed that no secondary mutations were acquired, and the genetic background was otherwise identical to the parental R20291 aside from the anticipated single intron insertion. Characterization of the growth kinetics of C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT and R20291 revealed no obvious differences under the conditions tested (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

RNA-seq analysis of the regulon in the C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant.

As the S. aureus agr locus plays a key role in controlling the coordinated expression of virulence genes, we used RNA-seq analysis to begin to define the regulon under the control of the C. difficile R20291 agr locus. To this end, total RNA was isolated from C. difficile R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT grown to late exponential phase. The log2 fold change of transcript abundance between these RNA populations was obtained (P ≤ 0.1) (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), and transcripts were visualized by mapping the coverage per base pair to the reference R20291 genome (Fig. 2a). In total, 75 transcripts were found to be significantly differentially expressed in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant. The differentially regulated transcripts were categorized according to their functional class, and the enrichment of each represented class was determined. The functional classes of flagellar regulon and pathogenicity, regulators, and macromolecule degradation were enriched for differentially expressed genes in R20291 agrA76a::CT compared to R20291 (P ≤ 0.05 by hypergeometric test) (Fig. 2b). Validation of RNA sequencing results was performed by qRT-PCR. In agreement with the R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome, tcdA, fliC, and CDR20291_1514 transcripts all were underrepresented (−1.39-, −5.64-, and −2.93-fold change, respectively) compared to wild-type R20291 (Fig. 3).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Chromosomal representation of R20291 agrA76a::CT differentially expressed genes. (a) The log2 fold change of differentially expressed transcripts mapped per base pair to C. difficile R20291 whole-genome sequence in DNA plotter (73). The outermost circles represent the CDSs of the forward strand (first circle) and the reverse strand (second circle) colored by functional classes assigned. The inner circle represents differentially expressed transcripts (P ≤ 0.1) (red peaks, underexpressed; green peaks, overexpressed). (b) Categorization of differentially expressed transcripts according to functional classes. The percentages of each functional class represented relative to the whole genome are listed. Three functional classes were enriched relative to background distributions: flagellar regulon and pathogenicity (P = 6.38 × 10−22), regulators (P = 0.002), and macromolecule degradation (P = 0.001) (P ≤ 0.05 by hypergeometric test).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Validation of RNA-seq by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Relative mRNA levels of transcripts corresponding to tcdA, fliC, and CDR20291_1514. Data are from three independent experiments performed in triplicate, and error bars indicate standard deviations. Fold change of R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant mRNA levels are indicated relative to wild-type R20291 levels.

The transcript of agrC, encoding the cognate sensor kinase directly downstream of agrA, was underexpressed in the R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome (P = 2.17 × 10−18). There may be a regulatory role of AgrA in agrC expression causing this decrease. Alternatively, it is possible that the ClosTron insertion in the agrA gene affects the transcription of the subsequent gene in the locus, in this case agrC. Polar effects resulting from insertional inactivation using the ClosTron system have been described previously in independent mutants located in the C. difficile flagellar region (fliF, fliG, and flhB-flhR), which resulted in 8- to 20-fold downregulation of the downstream transcript, fliA (25, 50).

Of the 75 differentially expressed transcripts, 64 were determined to be underrepresented in the R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Most strikingly, the transcripts of the majority of genes involved in flagellum formation were underexpressed. Of the 54 genes believed to be involved in flagellum formation, 50 were affected, including all of the regulatory and structural genes, with the exception of fliN, encoding the hypothetical C-ring protein. The flagellin, the major structural protein of flagella, encoded by fliC, was underexpressed 6.5-fold (P = 2.05 × 10−20). The anti-sigma factor encoded by flgM and alternative sigma factor encoded by fliA were underrepresented 6.2- and 4.2-fold, respectively, and may be direct targets of the transcriptional regulator AgrA. Three of the six flagellin modification genes found in the 027 strains were also found to be underexpressed, including two putative glycosyl transferases, CDR20291_0242 and CDR20291_0243 (3.7- and 2.7-fold change, respectively).

Expression of mRNA encoding TcdA was underexpressed 2.4-fold (P = 3.0 × 10−4) in R20291 agrA76a::CT compared to that in R20291 (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The reason for this altered expression cannot be determined from these data, but it is interesting that the C. difficile flagellar regulon has been reported recently to modulate toxin A production (25). TcdB was not as highly expressed as TcdA in the R20291 wild-type and R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant transcriptomes and was not differentially regulated in the R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome.

Ten genes annotated as regulatory proteins were differentially expressed in R20291 agrA76a::CT compared to wild-type R20291. These included three genes linked to c-di-GMP signaling, CDR20291_0685, CDR20291_1268, and CDR20291_1514, which were underrepresented in R20291 agrA76a::CT and encode proteins that contain GGDEF or EAL domains (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Furthermore, three transcripts encoding putative TCSs, CDR20291_3126 to CDR20291_3128, were also underexpressed in the R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome (see Table S3 in the supplemental material).

C. difficile is predicted to contain 234 putative small noncoding RNAs (51). In this study, 10 intergenic regions were differentially regulated in R20291 agrA76a::CT (see Tables S3 and S4 in the supplemental material). Each intergenic sequence was searched against a nonredundant nucleotide collection using NCBI BLAST, but no evidence of sequence conservation outside the Clostridium genus was found. Additionally, each sequence was searched against the Rfam database (52), but no Rfam matches were identified for 9/10 differentially regulated intergenic regions. However, the 5′ untranslated intergenic region upstream of the flagellar operon where the C. difficile c-di-GMP riboswitch, Cd1, is located was underexpressed 5.3-fold (P = 1.22 × 10−13). Due to its location, Cd1 is suggested to regulate flagellar biosynthesis genes and motility by responding to cyclic di-GMP concentrations (53).

agr locus positively regulates C. difficile flagellar biosynthesis and TcdA in vitro.

Based on the RNA-seq transcriptome data, we hypothesized that the C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant would be unable to form flagellar filaments. Consequently, cultures of R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT were prepared as described for the RNA-sequencing analysis and examined using electron microscopy for the formation of flagella. This analysis revealed that while peritrichous flagellar filaments were abundant on the cell surface of R20291, equivalent structures were absent from similarly treated R20291 agrA76a::CT cultures (Fig. 4).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Visualization of C. difficile flagellar filaments. Electron microscopy reveals the absence of flagella in R20291 agrA76a::CT. Cultures were grown to late exponential phase in BHI broth. Scale bar, 1 μm.

A sandwich ELISA was used to determine the levels of TcdA expressed in R20291 or R20291 agrA76a::CT culture supernatants grown under conditions equivalent to those used for RNA preparation (Fig. 5). C. difficile R20291 cultures harbored detectable TcdA at 7.42 ng/ml, which is comparable to R20291 agrA76a::CT at 3.32 ng/ml when cultured under equivalent conditions.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

agr locus positively regulates TcdA levels. Relative amounts of TcdA produced by C. difficile R20291, R20291 agrA76a::CT, and agrA complement grown to late exponential phase in BHI broth are shown. C. difficile R20291 produced TcdA at 7.42 ng/ml, the agrA strain produced it at 3.32 ng/ml, and the agrA complemented strain produced it at 8.11 ng/ml. Data represent four independent experiments performed in triplicate. Error bars represent standard errors of the means. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (**, P < 0.01 by Student's t test).

The agrA complementation vector (pMTL-84151-agrA) was introduced into the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant to confirm that the observed phenotypes were the result of the ClosTron insertion in the agrA gene (see Materials and Methods). Growth kinetics for wild-type R20291, R20291 agrA76a::CT, and agrA complemented strains revealed similar growth dynamics between all three strains (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The agrA complementation vector did not restore the flagellar filaments to the cell surface in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant strain. It is possible that the complementation vector did not express wild-type levels of agrA; therefore, it failed to complement the flagella. However, the agrA complemented strain successfully restored TcdA production to 8.11 ng/ml, comparable to wild-type R20291 levels (P = 0.008) (Fig. 5).

C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT exhibits an early colonization defect in mice.

C. difficile R20291 can establish a chronic intestinal infection in the murine model, with relapse infection consistently occurring after cessation of vancomycin treatment (5456). To assess any role of the agr locus in the murine model of infection, direct fitness comparisons using competitive index (CI) experiments were performed. Here, healthy C57BL/6 mice (n = 5 per group) were orally infected after clindamycin treatment with equal numbers of viable R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT spores (5 × 106 CFU), and C. difficile CFU in fecal sheddings were monitored for 8 days after the challenge. C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT was shed at significantly lower levels than R20291 at 1, 4, 6, and 8 days postchallenge (Fig. 6a). To determine if the agr locus influences relapse, the mice from similar CI challenges were treated with a clinically relevant dose of oral vancomycin for 7 days (Fig. 6b), and C. difficile fecal shedding was again monitored. Fecal shedding of C. difficile returned in both groups within 3 days of vancomycin cessation. However, while the R20291 fecal shedding levels returned to pre-vancomycin-treatment levels, those of R20291 agrA76a::CT were consistently reduced. Statistical analysis confirmed that R20291 agrA76a::CT is relatively attenuated in terms of relapse infection.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

C. difficile R20291 agr locus mediates efficient colonization and relapsing infection in the murine model of infection. Mice were treated with clindamycin (clind; represented as a gray line) for 7 days prior to infection via gavage with equal amounts of C. difficile R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT. Fecal shedding of R20291 and the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant was monitored. Data are representative of two independent experiments (n = 5 per group). (a) Competitive index (CI) course of R20291 and R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant monitored over 8 days. Open circles indicate CI values from individual mice, and the red horizontal bars represent the geometric means. R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant is attenuated at 1, 4, 6, and 8 days postinfection as determined by Mann-Whitney test. (b) To test whether the mutation in the R20291 agrA locus influences relapsing infection, mice received a 7-day course of vancomycin (vanco; represented as a green line) following the initial infection, during which fecal shedding of C. difficile decreased to below the detection limit (represented as a dashed horizontal line). Fecal shedding of C. difficile relapsed in both groups; however, R20291 agrA76a::CT levels were consistently reduced. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001) and were determined by two-way analysis of variance.

DISCUSSION

Previous whole-genome sequencing analysis of the epidemic 027, R20291, identified the C. difficile agr locus (agrACDB), which showed similarity to the agr genes of S. aureus. Comparative genomic analysis with disease-causing ribotypes 017 and 001 confirmed that this locus is not specific to ribotype 027, as previously thought (48). The agr genes of C. difficile are in the reverse order from the agr genes of S. aureus, while the agr-like genes of Enterococcus faecalis (fsrABDC) are also different (57). The genetic organization of agr genes varies between different species (57, 58). This work aimed to identify the role of this locus in the virulence of C. difficile R20291; therefore, we generated an insertion mutant in the transcriptional regulator, AgrA.

In this study, we report the first RNA sequencing analysis of a C. difficile strain to investigate the regulatory network controlled by the agr locus. Similar to other studies reporting transcriptional profiling of relevant agr loci, we investigated the regulon in the 027 agrA mutant when grown to late exponential phase (59). Consequently, we identified 75 genes that were differentially regulated in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant transcriptome. The genes positively and negatively regulated by the agr locus included flagellar biosynthesis genes, tcdA, c-di-GMP regulatory protein genes, and uncharacterized two-component regulatory systems.

The majority of the flagellar biosynthesis genes were underexpressed in the C. difficile R20291 agrA76a::CT transcriptome. This could explain the inability of the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant to produce cell surface-anchored filaments in vitro as observed by TEM analysis. Experimental investigations have shown that insertional inactivation of the major flagellin subunit, FliC, results in the inability to produce flagellar filaments, resulting in a nonmotile phenotype and 10-fold less adherence to the murine cecum layer (60) (26). Interestingly, recent studies have shown that the C. difficile flagellar regulon has a role in the modulation of toxin A production (25). We have shown that the tcdA transcript is underexpressed in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant, and reduced levels of TcdA were produced in vitro compared to those of the parental wild-type strain, R20291. The reduced TcdA phenotype may relate to the differential expression of the flagellar regulon.

The small-molecule bacterial secondary messenger bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) is an important signaling molecule in bacteria, mediating the transition between sessile and motility lifestyles (61). C. difficile R20291 is predicted to encode up to 31 proteins involved in c-di-GMP turnover (62). C-di-GMP is synthesized by diguanylate cyclase enzymes that contain GGDEF domains, while phosphodiesterases that contain EAL or HD-GYP domains stimulate degradation of the messenger (63). The three underexpressed c-di-GMP signaling proteins (CDR20291_0685, CDR20291_1268, and CDR20291_1514) in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant transcriptome are solely phosphodiesterase enzymes due to a predicted catalytically inactive GGDEF domain. The protein orthologues have been experimentally characterized in C. difficile strain 630 (CD0757, CD1421, and CD1616, respectively) (62). Purified CD0757 was confirmed to have enzymatic activity when overexpressed in Vibrio cholerae, resulting in enhanced motility on soft agar (62). Conversely, mutating the glutamic acid residue of the EVLxR motif, important for enzymatic activity of the phosphodiesterase, abolished this enhanced motility phenotype (62). The agr-regulated c-di-GMP EAL-containing proteins, encoded by CD1421 and CD1616 in strain 630, also exhibited enhanced motility phenotype when overexpressed in V. cholerae. In agreement, Purcell and colleagues demonstrated that artificial elevation of c-di-GMP levels negatively regulated motility and flagellar biosynthesis genes (flgB, fliA, and flgM) in C. difficile 630 (64). Furthermore, our data reveal the differential expression of novel C. difficile transcriptional regulators and two-component systems, such as the sensor histidine kinase and cognate response regulator encoded by CDR20291_3424 and CDR20291_3425, respectively. Transcriptional regulators are commonly associated with the signaling network of c-di-GMP; in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, the response regulator CsgD activates the expression of diguanylate cyclase-containing protein, AdrA, in turn triggering cellulose biosynthesis (65, 66). It is possible that the levels of c-di-GMP in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant are increased due to the underexpression of the EAL-containing regulatory proteins, which stimulate degradation of the small cyclic molecule. The elevated c-di-GMP levels may be negatively affecting the flagellar biosynthesis genes, similar to the findings from Purcell et al. (64).

In addition to S. aureus, orthologous agr systems have been shown to be relevant for virulence in pathogenic firmicute species (57, 67). The inactivation of the agrA gene of L. monocytogenes attenuates virulence of the bacterium in the murine model, causing a 50% lethal dose (LD50) 10-fold higher than that of the wild-type strain (67). Furthermore, isogenic mutant strains of the agr-like locus in E. faecalis were attenuated for virulence in the rabbit endophthalmitis model (68, 69), in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans model (70), and in the mouse peritonitis model (57). Here, we have demonstrated that the 027 agr locus contributes to colonization and relapsing infection in the C. difficile murine infection model. The mechanism by which the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant has reduced colonization and reduced relapse infection is difficult to speculate, as the mutation affects 75 genes in vitro. The inability of the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant to form flagellar filaments may contribute to the attenuated colonization and relapse infection observed; similarly, TcdA may be necessary for efficient colonization of C. difficile R20291 in the murine model. A direct comparison in the murine infection model between defined agrA, tcdA, and aflagellate mutants may help to define the relative contribution of these determinants in colonization.

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant confirmed that the observed phenotypic differences were due solely to the insertional inactivation of the agrA gene and not acquired secondary mutations. The variation in the effectiveness of complementation may result from relatively low expression of AgrA from the complementing plasmid, allowing AgrA to bind only to the highest affinity sites. Furthermore, polar effects resulting from the AgrA mutation in downstream coding sequences may have inhibited effective complementation studies. The insertional deletion of agrA resulted in the underexpression of the downstream coding region of agrC, suggesting that agrAC form a single transcriptional unit. Similarly, the C. acteobutylicum agr cluster is also predicted to comprise two transcriptional units, agrBD and agrCA (71). However, the complete C. difficile agr locus is significantly underrepresented in the R20291 agrA76a::CT mutant at exponential phase in BHI broth (data not shown), suggesting that agrACDB is a single transcript, similar to S. aureus agr RNAII.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that the agr locus modulates known C. difficile virulence factors in vitro and has a contributory role in colonization and relapse of epidemic C. difficile 027 in vivo. We propose that this is due to the transcriptional regulatory control of the agr locus and have demonstrated its effect on the expression of multiple determinants by RNA sequencing.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant numbers 086418/Z, 098051, and 086418) and a Medical Research Council New Investigator Research Grant (T.D.L.; grant 93614).

We are grateful to John Heap and Nigel Minton for plasmids pMTL007C-E2 and pMTL-84151.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 14 June 2013

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00473-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lyras D, O'Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, Phumoonna T, Poon R, Adams V, Vedantam G, Johnson S, Gerding DN, Rood JI. 2009. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature 458:1176–1179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 467:711–713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shen A. 2012. Clostridium difficile toxins: mediators of inflammation. J. Innate Immun. 4:149–158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Johnson S, Gerding DN. 1998. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:1027–1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kelly CP, LaMont JT. 2008. Clostridium difficile—more difficult than ever. N. Engl. J. Med. 359:1932–1940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC, Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. 2005. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:2433–2441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hubert B, Loo VG, Bourgault AM, Poirier L, Dascal A, Fortin E, Dionne M, Lorange M. 2007. A portrait of the geographic dissemination of the Clostridium difficile North American pulsed-field type 1 strain and the epidemiology of C. difficile-associated disease in Quebec. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:238–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, Bourgault AM, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson TJ, Horn R, Rene P, Monczak Y, Dascal A. 2005. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:2442–2449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Redelings MD, Sorvillo F, Mascola L. 2007. Increase in Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates, United States, 1999–2004. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:1417–1419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Goorhuis A, Van der Kooi T, Vaessen N, Dekker FW, Van den Berg R, Harmanus C, van den Hof S, Notermans DW, Kuijper EJ. 2007. Spread and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 027/toxinotype III in The Netherlands. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:695–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT, Wilcox MH. 2007. Clostridium difficile: changing epidemiology and new treatment options. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 20:376–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Warny M, Pepin J, Fang A, Killgore G, Thompson A, Brazier J, Frost E, McDonald LC. 2005. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 366:1079–1084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. He M, Miyajima F, Roberts P, Ellison L, Pickard DJ, Martin MJ, Connor TR, Harris SR, Fairley D, Bamford KB, D'Arc S, Brazier J, Brown D, Coia JE, Douce G, Gerding D, Kim HJ, Koh TH, Kato H, Senoh M, Louie T, Michell S, Butt E, Peacock SJ, Brown NM, Riley T, Songer G, Wilcox M, Pirmohamed M, Kuijper E, Hawkey P, Wren BW, Dougan G, Parkhill J, Lawley TD. 2012. Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile. Nat. Genet. 45:109–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stabler RA, He M, Dawson L, Martin M, Valiente E, Corton C, Lawley TD, Sebaihia M, Quail MA, Rose G, Gerding DN, Gibert M, Popoff MR, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Wren BW. 2009. Comparative genome and phenotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile 027 strains provides insight into the evolution of a hypervirulent bacterium. Genome Biol. 10:R102. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Healthcare Commission 2007. Investigation into outbreaks of Clostridium difficile at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sebaihia M, Wren BW, Mullany P, Fairweather NF, Minton N, Stabler R, Thomson NR, Roberts AP, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Wang H, Holden MT, Wright A, Churcher C, Quail MA, Baker S, Bason N, Brooks K, Chillingworth T, Cronin A, Davis P, Dowd L, Fraser A, Feltwell T, Hance Z, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Moule S, Mungall K, Price C, Rabbinowitsch E, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Stevens K, Unwin L, Whithead S, Dupuy B, Dougan G, Barrell B, Parkhill J. 2006. The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nat. Genet. 38:779–786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dapa T, Leuzzi R, Ng YK, Baban ST, Adamo R, Kuehne SA, Scarselli M, Minton NP, Serruto D, Unnikrishnan M. 2013. Multiple factors modulate biofilm formation by the anaerobic pathogen Clostridium difficile. J. Bacteriol. 195:545–555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lee AS, Song KP. 2005. LuxS/autoinducer-2 quorum sensing molecule regulates transcriptional virulence gene expression in Clostridium difficile. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 335:659–666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Antunes A, Martin-Verstraete I, Dupuy B. 2011. CcpA-mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 79:882–899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dineen SS, Villapakkam AC, Nordman JT, Sonenshein AL. 2007. Repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression by CodY. Mol. Microbiol. 66:206–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Saujet L, Monot M, Dupuy B, Soutourina O, Martin-Verstraete I. 2011. The key sigma factor of transition phase, SigH, controls sporulation, metabolism, and virulence factor expression in Clostridium difficile. J. Bacteriol. 193:3186–3196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rosenbusch KE, Bakker D, Kuijper EJ, Smits WK. 2012. C. difficile 630Deltaerm Spo0A regulates sporulation, but does not contribute to toxin production, by direct high-affinity binding to target DNA. PLoS One 7:e48608. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Deakin LJ, Clare S, Fagan RP, Dawson LF, Pickard DJ, West MR, Wren BW, Fairweather NF, Dougan G, Lawley TD. 2012. The Clostridium difficile spo0A gene is a persistence and transmission factor. Infect. Immun. 80:2704–2711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Underwood S, Guan S, Vijayasubhash V, Baines SD, Graham L, Lewis RJ, Wilcox MH, Stephenson K. 2009. Characterization of the sporulation initiation pathway of Clostridium difficile and its role in toxin production. J. Bacteriol. 191:7296–7305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Aubry A, Hussack G, Chen W, KuoLee R, Twine SM, Fulton KM, Foote S, Carrillo CD, Tanha J, Logan SM. 2012. Modulation of toxin production by the flagellar regulon in Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 80:3521–3532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tasteyre A, Barc MC, Collignon A, Boureau H, Karjalainen T. 2001. Role of FliC and FliD flagellar proteins of Clostridium difficile in adherence and gut colonization. Infect. Immun. 69:7937–7940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Recsei P, Kreiswirth B, O'Reilly M, Schlievert P, Gruss A, Novick RP. 1986. Regulation of exoprotein gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by agar. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:58–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Novick RP, Ross HF, Projan SJ, Kornblum J, Kreiswirth B, Moghazeh S. 1993. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 12:3967–3975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tegmark K, Morfeldt E, Arvidson S. 1998. Regulation of agr-dependent virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus by RNAIII from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 180:3181–3186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Koenig RL, Ray JL, Maleki SJ, Smeltzer MS, Hurlburt BK. 2004. Staphylococcus aureus AgrA binding to the RNAIII-agr regulatory region. J. Bacteriol. 186:7549–7555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Leonard PG, Bezar IF, Sidote DJ, Stock AM. 2012. Identification of a hydrophobic cleft in the LytTR domain of AgrA as a locus for small molecule interactions that inhibit DNA binding. Biochemistry 51:10035–10043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Marsden GL, Davis IJ, Wright VJ, Sebaihia M, Kuijper EJ, Minton NP. 2010. Array comparative hybridisation reveals a high degree of similarity between UK and European clinical isolates of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile. BMC Genomics 11:389. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wilson KH. 1983. Efficiency of various bile salt preparations for stimulation of Clostridium difficile spore germination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:1017–1019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wren BW, Tabaqchali S. 1987. Restriction endonuclease DNA analysis of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:2402–2404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, Chantratita N, Gardete S, Tavares A, Day N, Lindsay JA, Edgeworth JD, de Lencastre H, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Bentley SD. 2010. Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327:469–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Heap JT, Kuehne SA, Ehsaan M, Cartman ST, Cooksley CM, Scott JC, Minton NP. 2010. The ClosTron: mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined. J. Microbiol. Methods 80:49–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST, Carter GP, Minton NP. 2007. The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. J. Microbiol. Methods 70:452–464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Perutka J, Wang W, Goerlitz D, Lambowitz AM. 2004. Use of computer-designed group II introns to disrupt Escherichia coli DExH/D-box protein and DNA helicase genes. J. Mol. Biol. 336:421–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Purdy D, O'Keeffe TA, Elmore M, Herbert M, McLeod A, Bokori-Brown M, Ostrowski A, Minton NP. 2002. Conjugative transfer of clostridial shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium difficile through circumvention of the restriction barrier. Mol. Microbiol. 46:439–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Williams DR, Young DI, Young M. 1990. Conjugative plasmid transfer from Escherichia coli to Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:819–826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST, Minton NP. 2009. A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 78:79–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Perocchi F, Xu Z, Clauder-Munster S, Steinmetz LM. 2007. Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:e128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Anders S, Huber W. 2010. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11:R106. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 3:1101–1108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Goujon M, McWilliam H, Li W, Valentin F, Squizzato S, Paern J, Lopez R. 2010. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:W695–W699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. He M, Sebaihia M, Lawley TD, Stabler RA, Dawson LF, Martin MJ, Holt KE, Seth-Smith HM, Quail MA, Rance R, Brooks K, Churcher C, Harris D, Bentley SD, Burrows C, Clark L, Corton C, Murray V, Rose G, Thurston S, van Tonder A, Walker D, Wren BW, Dougan G, Parkhill J. 2010. Evolutionary dynamics of Clostridium difficile over short and long time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:7527–7532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ji G, Beavis R, Novick RP. 1997. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 276:2027–2030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kuehne SA, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2010. The emergence of “hypervirulence” in Clostridium difficile. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300:387–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chen Y, Indurthi DC, Jones SW, Papoutsakis ET. 2011. Small RNAs in the genus Clostridium. mBio 2:e00340-00310. 10.1128/mBio.00340-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Burge SW, Daub J, Eberhardt R, Tate J, Barquist L, Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR, Gardner PP, Bateman A. 2013. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D226–D232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Sudarsan N, Lee ER, Weinberg Z, Moy RH, Kim JN, Link KH, Breaker RR. 2008. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science 321:411–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW, Goulding D, Stabler RA, Croucher N, Mastroeni P, Scott P, Raisen C, Mottram L, Fairweather NF, Wren BW, Parkhill J, Dougan G. 2009. Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infect. Immun. 77:3661–3669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, Nanthakumar N, Cheknis A, Gerding DN, Kelly CP. 2008. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135:1984–1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW, Stares MD, Connor TR, Raisen C, Goulding D, Rad R, Schreiber F, Brandt C, Deakin LJ, Pickard DJ, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Clark TG, Parkhill J, Dougan G. 2012. Targeted restoration of the intestinal microbiota with a simple, defined bacteriotherapy resolves relapsing Clostridium difficile disease in mice. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002995. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2000. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence. Infect. Immun. 68:2579–2586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wuster A, Babu MM. 2008. Conservation and evolutionary dynamics of the agr cell-to-cell communication system across firmicutes. J. Bacteriol. 190:743–746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bourgogne A, Hilsenbeck SG, Dunny GM, Murray BE. 2006. Comparison of OG1RF and an isogenic fsrB deletion mutant by transcriptional analysis: the Fsr system of Enterococcus faecalis is more than the activator of gelatinase and serine protease. J. Bacteriol. 188:2875–2884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Dingle TC, Mulvey GL, Armstrong GD. 2011. Mutagenic analysis of the Clostridium difficile flagellar proteins, FliC and FliD, and their contribution to virulence in hamsters. Infect. Immun. 79:4061–4067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Simm R, Morr M, Kader A, Nimtz M, Romling U. 2004. GGDEF and EAL domains inversely regulate cyclic di-GMP levels and transition from sessility to motility. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1123–1134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Bordeleau E, Fortier LC, Malouin F, Burrus V. 2011. c-di-GMP turn-over in Clostridium difficile is controlled by a plethora of diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002039. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Srivastava D, Waters CM. 2012. A tangled web: regulatory connections between quorum sensing and cyclic Di-GMP. J. Bacteriol. 194:4485–4493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Purcell EB, McKee RW, McBride SM, Waters CM, Tamayo R. 2012. Cyclic diguanylate inversely regulates motility and aggregation in Clostridium difficile. J. Bacteriol. 194:3307–3316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Garcia B, Latasa C, Solano C, Garcia-del Portillo F, Gamazo C, Lasa I. 2004. Role of the GGDEF protein family in Salmonella cellulose biosynthesis and biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol. 54:264–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Zogaj X, Nimtz M, Rohde M, Bokranz W, Romling U. 2001. The multicellular morphotypes of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli produce cellulose as the second component of the extracellular matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1452–1463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Autret N, Raynaud C, Dubail I, Berche P, Charbit A. 2003. Identification of the agr locus of Listeria monocytogenes: role in bacterial virulence. Infect. Immun. 71:4463–4471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Engelbert M, Mylonakis E, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB, Gilmore MS. 2004. Contribution of gelatinase, serine protease, and fsr to the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. Infect. Immun. 72:3628–3633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Mylonakis E, Engelbert M, Qin X, Sifri CD, Murray BE, Ausubel FM, Gilmore MS, Calderwood SB. 2002. The Enterococcus faecalis fsrB gene, a key component of the fsr quorum-sensing system, is associated with virulence in the rabbit endophthalmitis model. Infect. Immun. 70:4678–4681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sifri CD, Mylonakis E, Singh KV, Qin X, Garsin DA, Murray BE, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB. 2002. Virulence effect of Enterococcus faecalis protease genes and the quorum-sensing locus fsr in Caenorhabditis elegans and mice. Infect. Immun. 70:5647–5650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Steiner E, Scott J, Minton NP, Winzer K. 2012. An agr quorum sensing system that regulates granulose formation and sporulation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:1113–1122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Sidote DJ, Barbieri CM, Wu T, Stock AM. 2008. Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR domain bound to DNA reveals a beta fold with an unusual mode of binding. Structure 16:727–735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. 2009. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 25:119–120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES