Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2013 Sep;51(9):3107–3109. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01324-13

Prevalence of 10 Human Polyomaviruses in Fecal Samples from Children with Acute Gastroenteritis: a Case-Control Study

Ke Li a, Junhua Guo b, Rong Zhao a, Ying Xue a, Lihong Chen a, Jian Yang a, Junping Peng a,, Qi Jin a,
PMCID: PMC3754648  PMID: 23824769

Abstract

We conducted a case-control study to explore the prevalence of 10 human polyomaviruses in fecal specimens from hospitalized children with diarrhea and asymptomatic control subjects by using multiplex PCR detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. The differences between cases and controls were not statistically significant.

TEXT

Polyomaviruses (PyVs) are small and encapsidated and contain a double-stranded, circular DNA genome of approximately 5 kbp that can infect mammals and birds. Until 2007, only two human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) were known: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) and JC polyomavirus (JCPyV), which were coincidentally isolated in 1971 (1, 2). Thanks to the advances in molecular biology, remarkable discoveries have added several new HPyVs in the past 6 years, including KI polyomavirus (KIPyV), WU polyomavirus (WUPyV), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), human polyomavirus 6 (HPyV6), HPyV7, trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus (TSPyV), HPyV9, MW polyomavirus (MWPyV), HPyV10, and MX polyomavirus (MXPyV) (311). Multiple sequence alignment analysis revealed that MWPyV, HPyV10, and MXPyV were different variants of the same species (11), so we use MWPyV to represent this species. While we were preparing this report, STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) and HPyV12 were detected in human stool specimens (12) and in resected human liver tissue (13), respectively. Numerous studies have indicated that HPyV infection is common in humans and associated with a broad spectrum of diseases, including nephropathy, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, Merkel cell carcinoma, and trichodysplasia spinulosa (14). Although many groups have tried to establish an association between disease and the presence of HPyV species, no associations have been established to date for KIPyV, WUPyV, HPyV6, HPyV7, HPyV9, MWPyV, STLPyV, and HPyV12 (1216).

The detection of MWPyV in stool samples obtained from children with diarrhea, many of whom have no known infectious etiology, raises the possibility that MWPyV might play a role in the development of human diarrhea (9, 11). Diarrheal illnesses caused by pathogenic enteric bacteria and viruses remain among the top five causes of death worldwide, especially in developing countries. Many viruses have been shown to cause diarrhea either directly or indirectly (17, 18). However, the etiologic agents of many diarrheal cases remain unknown. Thus, we conducted a case-control study to explore the prevalence of 10 HPyV (BKPyV, JCPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV, MCPyV, HPyV6, HPyV7, TSPyV, HPyV9, and MWPyV) strains in China by testing fecal specimens from the Hunan and Hebei provinces of China by using multiplex PCR detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (PCR-MS). PCR-MS is a powerful tool for microbial detection and confirmation (1922).

Stools from 211 hospitalized children with diarrhea and from 208 asymptomatic control subjects were collected between April 2011 and January 2012. The selection of hospitalized children with diarrhea and healthy children was made according to methods described in a previous report (23). Briefly, diarrhea was defined as ≥3 loose stools in the previous 24 to 72 h. Control subjects were asymptomatic children who visited the hospital for a routine examination and did not have diarrhea, fever, vomiting, or a respiratory illness in the previous 3-week period. All children were <5 years of age, and their parents were interviewed to determine the children's symptoms. We collected the information on use of antibiotics during the previous 3-week period of these children. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all of the children who provided specimens, and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Clinical characteristics of the children are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the case and control children

Characteristic Value
Case
Control
Positive (n = 72 children) Negative (n = 139 children) Total (n = 211 children) Positive (n = 63 children) Negative (n = 145 children) Total (n = 208 children)
Age 9.93 ± 6.30 11.78 ± 8.43 11.15 ± 7.84a 10.59 ± 8.79 11.64 ± 8.03 11.32 ± 8.30
Sex
    Female 20 58 78b 27 52 79
    Male 52 81 133 36 93 129
No. of children with fever 27c 60 87 i
No. of children with respiratory symptoms 24d 50 74
No. of children with vomiting 26e 63 89
Duration of diarrhea (no. of days)h 3.60 ± 2.26f 4.08 ± 3.60 3.91 ± 3.22
Frequency of diarrhea (no. of times per day) 5.47 ± 2.56g 5.04 ± 2.44 5.18 ± 2.50
a

P > 0.4, by Student's t test.

b

P = 0.83, by χ2 test.

c

P = 0.43, by χ2 test.

d

P = 0.70, by χ2 test.

e

P = 0.20, by χ2 test.

f

P > 0.7, by Student's t test.

g

P > 0.8, by Student's t test.

h

Duration of diarrhea indicates the time from the first day with diarrhea to the day of sample collection.

i

–, absent.

Optimal primers and extension primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) to target the VP1 gene were designed using the Assay Design software, version 4.0 (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA). The PCR-MS assay was performed according to methods described in a previous report (20). Plasmids containing the full-length VP1 sequence of 10 representative human polyomaviruses were used to determine the analytical sensitivity of the PCR-MS assay (see Table S1). The specificity of the PCR-MS method was analyzed by using 1,000 plasmids/reaction with specific inserts of each target HPyV strain. The results showed that this method accurately identified 10 HPyVs (data not shown). Using a standard 10-fold serial dilution of 1 to 10,000 plasmids/reaction, we determined that the detection limit per PCR was approximately 10 copies (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Throughout the PCR-MS testing, there were no results from the negative controls, thereby ensuring the validity of the results.

HPyV detection via PCR-MS was performed in a blinded fashion. In the case group, a total of 211 fecal samples were analyzed via PCR-MS. As shown in Table 2, four HPyV strains (KIPyV, WUPyV, MCPyV, and MWPyV) were detected, whereas the remaining six were not. Infections by a single HPyV were found in 67 (31.8%) samples, and dual HPyV infections were found in five (2.4%) samples. The highest prevalence of the viruses investigated here was 30.3%, which was determined for MCPyV. Of the five dual infections, four (1.9%) were WUPyV-MCPyV and one (0.5%) was MCPyV-MWPyV. In the control group, a total of 208 fecal specimens were analyzed, of which 63 (30.3%) were positive for WUPyV, MCPyV, and/or MWPyV, 59 (28.4%) were positive for a single virus, and three (1.4%) were identified as having dual infections, including one of WUPyV-MCPyV, one of WUPyV-MWPyV, and one of MCPyV-MWPyV. Only one sample (0.5%) was identified as having a triple infection (WUPyV-MCPyV-MWPyV). The MCPyV may come from the gastrointestinal epithelium or ingested skin/tissues of animals. In the future, we also need to study whether MCPyV can colonize in rectal epithelium.

Table 2.

Detection of human polyomaviruses

Human polyomavirush No. (%) of positive results
Hebei
Hunan
Total
Case (n = 151 total samples) Control (n = 150 total samples) Case (n = 60 total samples) Control (n = 58 total samples) Case (n = 211 total samples) Control (n = 208 total samples)
KIPyV 0 0 1 (1.7) 0 1 (0.5) 0
WUPyV 3 (2.0)a 4 (2.7) 6 (10.0) 0 9 (4.3)e 4 (1.9)
MCPyV 48 (31.8)b 42 (28.0) 16 (26.7)c 16 (27.6) 64 (30.3)f 58 (27.9)
MWPyV 0 4 (2.7) 3 (5.0)d 2 (3.4) 3 (1.4)g 6 (2.9)
All 51 (33.8) 50 (33.3) 26 (43.3) 18 (31.0) 77 (36.5) 68 (32.7)
a

χ2 = 7.91 × 10−5; P = 0.99, by χ2 test.

b

χ2 = 0.52; P = 0.47, by χ2 test.

c

χ2 = 0.01; P = 0.91, by χ2 test.

d

χ2 = 0.002; P = 0.97, by χ2 test.

e

χ2 = 1.21; P = 0.27, by χ2 test.

f

χ2 = 0.30; P = 0.58, by χ2 test.

g

χ2 = 0.48; P = 0.49, by χ2 test.

h

KIPyV, KI polyomavirus; WUPyV, WU polyomavirus; MCPyV, Merkel cell polyomavirus; MWPyV, MW polyomavirus.

HPyV was not more prevalent among children with gastroenteritis than among the asymptomatic children (34.1% versus 30.3%; χ2 = 0.71, P = 0.40). Among children with gastroenteritis, when HPyV-positive and -negative groups were compared, the rates of fever, respiratory symptoms, and vomiting among patients were not significantly different (P = 0.43, 0.70, and 0.20, respectively, by χ2 test). In addition, the mean duration and frequency of diarrhea did not differ significantly (P > 0.7 and 0.8, respectively, by Student's t test).

MWPyV was not more prevalent among the case group than the control group (1.4% versus 2.9%; P = 0.34, by Fisher's exact test). When MWPyV-positive and -negative groups were compared, the rates of fever and vomiting among the patients were not significantly different (P = 0.07 and 1, respectively, by Fisher's exact test). In addition, the mean duration and frequency of diarrhea did not differ significantly (P > 0.7 and 0.6, respectively, by Student's t test). MWPyV loads were quantified according to methods described in a previous report (9). The target was LTAg, and the resulting amplicon was 73 bp. The mean MWPyV load in the case and control groups was 5.49 × 106 and 4.53 × 106 copies/ml, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the mean values of these two groups (P > 0.05, by log-normal Student's t test). In this regard, our results were generally consistent with previous findings (11). However, we cannot preclude the possibility of MWPyV as an etiologic agent of diarrhea. Yu et al. (11) reported that six MWPyV-positive diarrheal samples tested negative using a broad-spectrum viral microarray and specific PCR assays for all known diarrheal viruses. Thus, further research is warranted to detect all known diarrheal viruses and pathogenic bacteria in MWPyV-positive samples. Lim et al. (12) detected MWPyV and STLPyV in three serial fecal samples collected from the same patient, who had received a lung transplant 3 years previously. To further clarify the pathogenicity of MWPyV, samples from immunocompromised individuals should be screened.

In summary, we performed a case-control study to investigate the correlation between 10 HPyV species and the occurrence of gastroenteritis but found none. Despite the frequent detection of HPyV in fecal samples, our data did not support a causative role of HPyV in gastroenteritis, although more studies are needed in the future. We also need to perform a study among outpatient children with diarrhea to test the possibility that HPyVs are linked to community-acquired, self-resolving diarrheal cases.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of People's Republic of China (2011ZX10004-001), a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation award (OPP1016839), and the Institute of Pathogen Biology, PUMC-CAMS (2013IPB102).

We give special thanks to Zhaojun Duan for kindly providing the clinical samples.

Junping Peng, Junhua Guo, and Qi Jin have a pending patent application (201310174312.X; People's Republic of China) related to this report.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 3 July 2013

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01324-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gardner SD, Field AM, Coleman DV, Hulme B. 1971. New human papovavirus (B.K.) isolated from urine after renal transplantation. Lancet i:1253–1257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Padgett BL, Walker DL, ZuRhein GM, Eckroade RJ, Dessel BH. 1971. Cultivation of papova-like virus from human brain with progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy. Lancet i:1257–1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Allander T, Andreasson K, Gupta S, Bjerkner A, Bogdanovic G, Persson MA, Dalianis T, Ramqvist T, Andersson B. 2007. Identification of a third human polyomavirus. J. Virol. 81:4130–4136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buck CB, Phan GQ, Raiji MT, Murphy PM, McDermott DH, McBride AA. 2012. Complete genome sequence of a tenth human polyomavirus. J. Virol. 86:10887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. 2008. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science 319:1096–1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gaynor AM, Nissen MD, Whiley DM, Mackay IM, Lambert SB, Wu G, Brennan DC, Storch GA, Sloots TP, Wang D. 2007. Identification of a novel polyomavirus from patients with acute respiratory tract infections. PLoS Pathog. 3:e64. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schowalter RM, Pastrana DV, Pumphrey KA, Moyer AL, Buck CB. 2010. Merkel cell polyomavirus and two previously unknown polyomaviruses are chronically shed from human skin. Cell Host Microbe 7:509–515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scuda N, Hofmann J, Calvignac-Spencer S, Ruprecht K, Liman P, Kuhn J, Hengel H, Ehlers B. 2011. A novel human polyomavirus closely related to the African green monkey-derived lymphotropic polyomavirus. J. Virol. 85:4586–4590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siebrasse EA, Reyes A, Lim ES, Zhao G, Mkakosya RS, Manary MJ, Gordon JI, Wang D. 2012. Identification of MW polyomavirus, a novel polyomavirus in human stool. J. Virol. 86:10321–10326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van der Meijden E, Janssens RW, Lauber C, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Gorbalenya AE, Feltkamp MC. 2010. Discovery of a new human polyomavirus associated with trichodysplasia spinulosa in an immunocompromized patient. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001024. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu G, Greninger AL, Isa P, Phan TG, Martinez MA, de la Luz Sanchez M, Contreras JF, Santos-Preciado JI, Parsonnet J, Miller S, Derisi JL, Delwart E, Arias CF, Chiu CY. 2012. Discovery of a novel polyomavirus in acute diarrheal samples from children. PLoS One 7:e49449. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lim ES, Reyes A, Antonio M, Saha D, Ikumapayi UN, Adeyemi M, Stine OC, Skelton R, Brennan DC, Mkakosya RS, Manary MJ, Gordon JI, Wang D. 2013. Discovery of STL polyomavirus, a polyomavirus of ancestral recombinant origin that encodes a unique T antigen by alternative splicing. Virology 436:295–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Korup S, Rietscher J, Calvignac-Spencer S, Trusch F, Hofmann J, Moens U, Sauer I, Voigt S, Schmuck R, Ehlers B. 2013. Identification of a novel human polyomavirus in organs of the gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One 8:e58021. 10.1371/journal.pone.0058021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feltkamp MC, Kazem S, van der Meijden E, Lauber C, Gorbalenya AE. 2013. From Stockholm to Malawi: recent developments in studying human polyomaviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 94:482–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang M, Abend JR, Johnson SF, Imperiale MJ. 2009. The role of polyomaviruses in human disease. Virology 384:266–273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krumbholz A, Bininda-Emonds OR, Wutzler P, Zell R. 2009. Phylogenetics, evolution, and medical importance of polyomaviruses. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:784–799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khan MA, Bass DM. 2010. Viral infections: new and emerging. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 26:26–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramani S, Kang G. 2009. Viruses causing childhood diarrhoea in the developing world. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 22:477–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oeth P, del Mistro G, Marnellos G, Shi T, van den Boom D. 2009. Qualitative and quantitative genotyping using single base primer extension coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MassARRAY). Methods Mol. Biol. 578:307–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peng J, Gao L, Guo J, Wang T, Wang L, Yao Q, Zhu H, Jin Q. 2013. Type-specific detection of 30 oncogenic human papillomaviruses by genotyping both E6 and L1 genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:402–408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Peng J, Yang F, Xiong Z, Guo J, Du J, Hu Y, Jin Q. 2013. Sensitive and rapid detection of viruses associated with hand foot and mouth disease using multiplexed MALDI-TOF analysis. J. Clin. Virol. 56:170–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ross P, Hall L, Smirnov I, Haff L. 1998. High level multiplex genotyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 16:1347–1351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng WX, Jin Y, Duan ZJ, Xu ZQ, Qi HM, Zhang Q, Yu JM, Zhu L, Jin M, Liu N, Cui SX, Li HY, Fang ZY. 2008. Human bocavirus in children hospitalized for acute gastroenteritis: a case-control study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:161–167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES