Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a halophile present in marine and estuarine environments, ecosystems characterized by fluctuations in salinity and temperature. One strategy to thrive in such environments is the synthesis and/or uptake of compatible solutes. The V. parahaemolyticus genome contains biosynthesis systems for both ectoine and glycine betaine, which are known to act as compatible solutes in other species. We showed that V. parahaemolyticus had a 6% NaCl tolerance when grown in M9 minimal medium with 0.4% glucose (M9G) with a >5-h lag phase. By using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) analysis, we determined that cells synthesized ectoine and glutamate in a NaCl-dependent manner. The most effective compatible solutes as measured by a reduction in lag-phase growth in M9G with 6% NaCl (M9G 6% NaCl) were in the order glycine betaine > choline > proline = glutamate > ectoine. However, V. parahaemolyticus could use glutamate or proline as the sole carbon source, but not ectoine or glycine betaine, which suggests that these are bona fide compatible solutes. Expression analysis showed that the ectA and betA genes were more highly expressed in log-phase cells, and expression of both genes was induced by NaCl up-shock. Under all conditions examined, the ectA gene was more highly expressed than the betA gene. Analysis of in-frame deletions in betA and ectB and in a double mutant showed that the ectB mutant was defective for growth, and this defect was rescued by the addition of glycine betaine, proline, ectoine, and glutamate, indicating that these compounds are compatible solutes for this species. The presence of both synthesis systems was the predominant distribution pattern among members of the Vibrionaceae family, suggesting this is the ancestral state.
INTRODUCTION
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a halophile that is abundant in the aquatic environment and has been isolated from the water column and sediment and in association with crustaceans, mollusks, fish, and planktonic copepods (1–4). In the marine and estuarine environments, V. parahaemolyticus must navigate changing salinities, temperatures, and nutrient limitations and is known to proliferate during the warmer months of the year when the salinity and temperature are elevated (2, 5–9). Vibrio parahaemolyticus levels in marine and estuarine waters are linearly dependent on both salinity and water temperature, and in the winter, the bacterium is rarely isolated from the water column and is typically only found in small numbers in sediment (2, 5, 10).
Global climate change has resulted in an overall increase in ocean temperatures as well as the acidification of these waters, which also impacts the distribution of marine species (11–16). In recent years, occurrences of V. parahaemolyticus have been documented as far north as Alaska, and this northward migration trend may be attributed to the rise in ocean temperature (8, 9, 17). Interestingly, it was demonstrated that growth in differing NaCl concentrations alters the susceptibility of V. parahaemolyticus to other environmental stresses (18). It has been documented that growth of V. parahaemolyticus in 3% NaCl compared to 1% NaCl increased survival under both inorganic (HCl) and organic (acetic acid) acid conditions. In addition, at 42°C and −20°C, growth in 1% NaCl compared to 3% NaCl had a detrimental effect (18). It has also been suggested that temperature may play a role in virulence gene regulation (19).
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is of significant medical importance, as it is the leading cause of seafood-associated bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide (20–23). Generally, the bacterium infects the host through the gastrointestinal tract, where it encounters stress conditions such as low pH, bile salts, antimicrobial peptides, and low salinity as well as challenges from the host immune system. Most infections of V. parahaemolyticus occur as a result of consumption of raw or undercooked contaminated seafood.
Bioinformatics analysis has shown that the V. parahaemolyticus genome contains two compatible solute biosynthesis gene clusters, ectoine (encoded by ectABC-aspK) and glycine betaine (encoded by betIBA) biosynthesis gene clusters (24–26). In addition to these synthesis systems, the genome encodes two putative glutamine synthetase genes (VP0121 and VP1781), a glutamate synthetase gene (VPA0765), and a glutamate synthase gene cluster (VP0481-VP0484) as well as a putative bifunctional proline dehydrogenase/pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase that can perform the reversible reaction of glutamate to proline. Six putative compatible solute transporters, including four betaine/carnitine/choline transporters (BCCTs) and two ProVWX (also known as ProU) transporters are also contained within the genome (24–26). In many proteobacteria, the response to osmotic stress has two phases. The first phase is the short-term response resulting in the accumulation of K+. The second phase is the more long-term strategy, the synthesis and/or accumulation of compatible solutes that can be amassed in high concentrations without disturbing vital cellular functions (27). Compatible solutes include but are not limited to trehalose, glycerol, mannitol, free amino acids such as glutamate, glutamine, and proline and their derivatives betaine, glycine betaine, and ectoine (27–33). It has been proposed that most bacteria use the trimethylammonium compound glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine) as their preferred compatible solute (30, 34). However, one of the most widespread compatible solutes is ectoine (1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2-methyl-4-pyrimidinecarboxylic acid) (30, 34). Ectoine is the only compatible solute synthesized in Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio fischeri, and in V. cholerae, it was shown to play a role in osmotolerance (35). Previously, we demonstrated using comparative physiological analysis that V. parahaemolyticus compared with Vibrio vulnificus YJ016, V. cholerae N16961, and V. fischeri ES114, which all contain fewer compatible solute systems, had a growth advantage under different salinity concentrations and temperatures (25). We showed using one-dimension 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) that at high salinity V. parahaemolyticus is capable of de novo synthesis of ectoine whereas a ΔectB strain is not (25). In a broader context, it has been shown that compatible solutes and solute activities can protect against nonosmotic stresses, for example high-pressure stress can be countered by kosmotropes (36), while some studies have shown that compatible solutes can cross-protect against heat and cold-temperature stress (27, 37, 38).
In this study, we examined the role of compatible solute synthesis in the V. parahaemolyticus NaCl tolerance response and determined the compatible solutes synthesized and utilized to greatest effect by this bacterium. It was determined by using 1H-NMR analysis the major compatible solutes synthesized by V. parahaemolyticus when the cells were osmotically challenged. We examined whether V. parahaemolyticus could synthesize both ectoine and glycine betaine in the presence of their precursors aspartic acid and choline, respectively. The conditions under which the ectoine and glycine betaine biosynthesis genes are expressed and whether NaCl induces expression were established. Using a molecular genetic approach, constructed deletions in each of the biosynthesis systems was examined for their effect on growth and survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 serotype O3:K6 (39) and generated mutants were routinely grown at 37°C with aeration in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) with 3% NaCl (wt/vol), or in M9 minimal medium containing 47.8 mM Na2HPO4, 22 mM KH2PO4, 18.7 mM NH4Cl, 8.6 mM NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 0.4% (wt/vol) glucose as the sole carbon source (M9G) with 3% NaCl (wt/vol) (M9G 3% NaCl). To recreate conditions of elevated osmotic strength, LB and M9G media were prepared with increasing concentrations of NaCl ranging from 1% to 11% NaCl (wt/vol). Compatible solutes or their precursors were added to growth media at the following concentrations: 100 μM glycine betaine, 100 μM ectoine, 1,000 μM choline, 1,000 μM aspartic acid, 1,000 μM glutamate, 1,000 μM glutamine, and 1,000 μM proline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Escherichia coli DH5α λpir used in this study was grown in LB medium containing 1% NaCl (wt/vol) at 37°C under aerobic conditions and E. coli β2155, an auxotroph for diaminopimelic acid (DAP), was grown at 37°C in LB containing 1% NaCl (LB 1% NaCl) broth supplemented with 0.3 mM DAP. All antibiotics were used at the following concentrations (wt/vol): ampicillin (Amp), 100 μg/ml; chloramphenicol (Cm), 25 μg/ml; and streptomycin (Str), 200 μg/ml.
Table 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Strain or plasmid | Description or relevant characteristic(s) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| V. parahaemolyticus strains | ||
| RIMD2210633 | O3:K6 clinical isolate | 39 |
| ΔbetA | RIMD2210633 ΔbetA (VPA1112) | This study |
| ΔectB-ΔbetA | RIMD2210633 ΔbetA (VPA1112) ΔectB (VP1721) | This study |
| ΔectB | RIMD2210633 ΔectB (VP1721) | 25 |
| Escherichia coli strains | ||
| DH5α λpir | λpir ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 recA1 hsdR17 deoR thi-1 supE44 gyrA96 relA1 | This study |
| DH5α λpir ΔbetA | DH5α λpir containing pDS132ΔbetA | This study |
| β2155 DAP | Donor for bacterial conjugation; thr1004 pro thi strA hsdS lacZΔM15 (F′ lacZΔM15 lacTRQJΔ36 proA+ proB+) ΔdapA Ermr pirRP4 (Kmr from SM10) | This study |
| β2155 DAP-ΔbetA | β2155 harboring pDS132ΔbetA | This study |
| β2155 DAP-ΔectB | β2155 harboring pDS132ΔectB | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pJET1.2 | General cloning vector; Ampr | |
| pΔbetA | betA mutant cloned into pJET1.2 | This study |
| pDS132 | Suicide vector for conjugal transfer and integration; R6K γori mobRP4 sacB Cmr | 54 |
| pDS132ΔbetA | pDS132 harboring truncated betA gene | This study |
| pDS132ΔectB | pDS132 harboring truncated ectB gene | 25 |
Growth analysis.
Growth analysis of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 and mutants was performed in a 96-well Tecan Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan US Inc., Durham, NC) in LB or M9G medium adjusted to the desired NaCl concentration and in the presence or absence of compatible solute or their precursors. Briefly, precultures of V. parahaemolyticus were grown overnight in LB or M9G medium, and a 2% inoculum of stationary-phase cells was used to inoculate fresh medium and grown for 5 h at 37°C with aeration. A 1:40 dilution of this inoculum was subsequently used to inoculate a 96-well microliter plate filled with 200 μl/well of medium adjusted to different NaCl concentrations. Bacterial growth was monitored hourly by measuring the optical densities (optical density at 595 nm [OD595]) for a period of 24 h or longer. All measurements were done in triplicate using at least two biological replicates. The data obtained were then computed statistically and plotted as the averages of means using Origin 8.5 software program (OriginLab Corporation, MA, USA).
NMR analysis of cellular extracts.
Cellular extracts of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 were prepared for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) analysis as previously described (25, 35). In brief, V. parahaemolyticus was cultured to log or stationary phase at 37°C in M9G supplemented to a NaCl concentration as indicated. Bacterial cells were then pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g, and the cell pellets were washed one time with fresh medium of equal salinity. Cells were then lysed by freeze-thaw cycles three times in dry ice and subsequently resuspended in 750 μl of ethanol. After centrifugation at 4,000 × g, ethanol extracts free of cellular debris were transferred into clean tubes, and ethanol was removed by evaporation in a Savant SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 3 h. The resulting dried pellet material was suspended in 500 μl of deuterium oxide (D2O) solvent (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Andover, MA), and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The suspended organic materials were transferred into a 5-mm NMR tube (Wilmad LabGlass, Vineland, NJ), and 1H-NMR spectral data were obtained by running samples in a Bruker Avance 400 NMR spectrometer at 400 MHz. Acquired 1H-NMR spectra were processed and analyzed by ACD/NMR Processor Academic Edition software version 12.01 (ACD/Labs, Canada).
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis.
Wild-type V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 was grown overnight at 37°C with aeration in LB or M9G medium containing 3% NaCl (wt/vol). A 2% aliquot of the overnight culture was then used to inoculate fresh LB 3% NaCl (wt/vol) or M9G 3% NaCl (wt/vol) and allowed to grow for 4 h (exponential/log phase) or 10 h (stationary phase). Cells grown in LB 3% NaCl (wt/vol) or M9G 3% NaCl (wt/vol) medium to either log or stationary phase were then subjected to osmotic up-shock conditions in 6% NaCl (wt/vol) for 30 min at 37°C. For all conditions examined, total RNA was isolated by adding 2 volumes of RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen kit; Valencia, CA) to the cell culture according to the manufacturer's instructions. Isolated RNA was quantified by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and examined by gel electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose to assess quality. RNA was treated with a DNase kit (Turbo DNase; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to remove any genomic DNA contaminant per the manufacturer's protocol. The first-strand cDNA synthesis reaction was initiated with 500 ng of purified RNA as a template in a reaction primed with 200 ng of random hexamers, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Superscript II reverse transcriptase kit; Invitrogen).
Gene expression analysis.
Transcriptional analysis was performed to assess the expression levels of ectoine and glycine betaine synthesis genes of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 in response to both high NaCl concentrations and different growth phases (log- and stationary-phase cells). Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) gene-specific primers were designed to amplify a 250- to 270-bp region of ectA and betA (Table 2). RT-PCR assays were then performed on cDNA diluted to 1:25 and 1:125. To ensure equal loading of the cDNA template in the RT-PCR and to correct for sampling errors, the expression level of each gene was compared to the level of the 16S rRNA (VPr001) control. Following RT-PCR amplification, the expression levels of the genes tested were assayed by running the samples on 1.8% agarose gel. RT-PCR cycling conditions used in these experiments were as follows: 3 min at 95°C; 29 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at72°C; and 5 min at 72°C. To quantify expression levels of ectA and betA after NaCl up-shock, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed. qPCR analysis was performed in a 20-μl reaction mixture to assess the fold change in expression levels of ectA and betA transcripts after salt up-shock in log- and stationary-phase cultures of V. parahaemolyticus. In brief, diluted cDNA template was mixed with HotStart-IT SYBR green qPCR master mix (USB, Santa Clara, CA) in a 96-well plate, and qPCR analysis was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Foster City, CA). The following cycling conditions were used for the real-time PCR assay: 2 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 10 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C. At the completion of the assay, the generated threshold cycle (CT) mean values were normalized across the samples with the 16S rRNA control, and the gene expression levels relative to culture grown in 3% NaCl for 4 h were calculated by using the ΔΔCT method (40). Two technical replicates and at least two biological replicates were performed for all assays. The significance of the different treatments was statistically computed using an unpaired Student's t test.
Table 2.
Primer pairs used in this study
| Target | Primera | Sequence (5′–3′)b | Product (bp)c |
|---|---|---|---|
| VPA1112 | VPA1112-A | TCTAGACCACGTACAGCAAGAGATCT | SOE-AB (379) |
| VPA1112-B | cagctgagatctggtaccTTTCATTTTGTGTCTCCTA | ||
| VPA1112-C | ggtaccagatctcagctgTCTTAATCTTTAAAAACTG | SOE-CD (334) | |
| VPA1112-D | GAGCTCTCGTTGGCATCCAGTTACC | ||
| VPA1112FL-F | AACCGTATTTATCGAC | SOE-AD* (713) | |
| VPA1112FL-R | TTCCAGGTCAGCAAAGCTC | ||
| VPr001 | VPr001-RT-F | ACCGCCTGGGGAGTACGGTC | 234 |
| VPr001-RT-R | TTGCGCTCGTTGCGGGACTT | ||
| VPA1112 | cbetA-F | AAAGAGGCGGGCTATCCAGAAACT | 264 |
| cbetA-R | TTTCTCAAATTCAACGCCGACCGC | ||
| VP1721 | cectA-F | CCAATGGCGGTTGTACTGCTGAAA | 269 |
| cectA-R | TCACCGTGAATACACTCGATGCCA |
At the end of the primer designations, F stands for forward and R stands for reverse.
Lowercase bold letters indicate complementary sequence tags.
SOE-AB, product of SOE PCR using VPA1112-A and VPA1112-B primers; SOE-CD, product of SOE PCR using VPA1112-C and VPA1112-D primers; SOE-AD*, product of SOE PCR using VP1112FL-F and VP1112FL-R primers.
Mutant construction.
A mutant harboring an in-frame nonpolar deletion in the choline dehydrogenase gene (betA) of V. parahaemolyticus was constructed by splicing by overlap extension (SOE) PCR and homologous recombination (41). The 1,746-bp gene sequence for choline dehydrogenase encoded by vpa1112 (betA) located within chromosome II of V. parahaemolyticus was retrieved from the NCBI GenBank (reference sequence NC_004605.1). SOE PCR primers along with screening primers were then designed and analyzed using Primer Quest from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, USA) (Table 2). The VPA1112-A primer was designed to include an XbaI restriction site at the 5′ end, while the VPA1112-B primer was modified at the 5′ end by the addition of a 18-nucleotide tag. The VPA1112-C primer was modified at the 5′ end to include a complementary sequence of the 18-nucleotide tag. Finally, the VPA1112-D primer was designed to include a SacI restriction site at the 5′ end (Table 2). For SOE PCR amplification, V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 genomic DNA was used as a template. Two rounds of PCR amplifications (5 min at 95°C; 29 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 51°C, and 2 min at 72°C; 10 min at 72°C) were performed first by using primer pairs VPA1112-A/VPA1112-B and VPA1112-C/VPA1112-D, generating products AB of 379 bp and CD of 334 bp. In the subsequent PCR amplification, primer pair VPA1112-A/VPA1112-D was used to generate a final product (betA-AD*) of 713 bp in size containing restriction sites for XbaI and SacI at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively. The purified betA-AD* DNA fragment was subcloned into the pJET1.2 vector (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD). The resulting recombinant plasmid pΔbetA was then transformed into E. coli DH5α λpir strain and cloned into a suicide vector, pDS132 (37). The resulting recombinant plasmid pDS132ΔbetA was subsequently used to transform E. coli β2155 λpir DAP auxotroph strain, which was conjugated into V. parahaemolyticus using a contact-dependent biparental mating by cross-streaking the two strains on LB agar with 1% NaCl and 0.3 mM DAP. Following a series of selections on chloramphenicol and sucrose plates, the recombinant clones that underwent double crossover (ΔbetA) were selected for the phenotype SacBr Cms and confirmed by colony PCR and DNA sequencing. Similarly, a ΔectB ΔbetA strain, devoid of both betA and ectB genes, was constructed by conjugating E. coli β2155 λpir pDS132ΔectB with V. parahaemolyticus betA mutant strain using the same protocol. The generated ΔectB ΔbetA strain was confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing.
Phylogenetic tree construction.
Detection of homologous protein sequences from compatible solute biosynthesis pathways was performed using EctA (VP1722) and BetA (VPA1112) sequences as probes in searches performed with the BLASTP program at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Sequences with minimum E values of 0.0001 without filtering were identified. We constructed a phylogenetic tree based on three housekeeping genes of all species of the Vibrionaceae family whose genome sequence is complete. The three housekeeping genes used were RNA polymerase subunit beta (rpoB), malate dehydrogenase (mdh), both present on chromosome I, and dihydrorotase (pyrC) present on chromosome II. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using complete concatenated sequences aligned by Clustal W 2.0, and the neighbor-joining (NJ) method was used for tree construction as implemented in MEGA5 (42). The bootstrap values for NJ trees were obtained after 1,000 generations, and MEGA5 tree viewer was used to visualize the trees and calculate confidence values (42). The locus tags for each of the genes examined are as follows: for rpoB, VSAL_I2866, VHA_000316, VAS14_19156, V12G01_00020, VAA_00351, VIBR0546_19107, VIBC2010_11541, VC0328, VIC_000047, VcycZ_010100012493, VF_2414, VFA_003646, VME_32530, VIBHAR_00225, VII00023_15976, VII_003403, VINI7043_00277, VordA3_010100006710, ZP_VIA_004104, VPMS16_1850, VP2922, VrotD_010100000953, VIS19158_14047, VISI1226_14532, AND4_18793, VEJY3_14765, VEA_002173, MED222_00572, VIBRN418_07985, VCJ_000034, VS_2963, VT1337_16523, and VV3159; for mdh, VSAL_I0359, VHA_002058, VAS14_08310, V12G01_12048, VAA_01685, VIBR0546_19297, VIBC2010_15622, VC_0432, VIC_004828, VcycZ_010100009988, VF_0276, VFA_000332, VME_16640, VIBHAR_00795, VII00023_17031, VII_003296, VINI7043_19588, VordA3_010100015387, VIA_003995, VPMS16_415, VP0325, VrotD_010100003320, VIS19158_04331, VISI1226_19579, AND4_18426, VEJY3_01590, VEx25_0219, MED222_17215, VIBRN418_11585, VCJ_000156, VS_0358, VT1337_16653, and VV0467; and for pyrC, VSAL_II0468, VHA_002563, VAS14_0095, V12G01_05941, VAA_00972, VIBR0546_14415, VIBC2010_09342, VCA0925, VIC_003248, VcycZ_010100004852, VF_A0412, VFA_003087, VME_35630, VIBHAR_05227, VII00023_05282, VII_000508, VINI7043_04290, VordA3_010100001797, VIA_000879, VPMS16_875, VPA0408, VrotD_010100021328, VIS19158_18031, VISI1226_03785, AND4_06254, VEJY3_22466, VEA_001337, MED222_08928, VIBRN418_08787, VCJ_003244, VS_II0272, VT1337_19727, and VVA0407.
RESULTS
Vibrio parahaemolyticus has a higher salt tolerance in nutrient-rich media.
To determine the role of nutrient availability in salt stress tolerance of V. parahaemolyticus, growth was analyzed in the presence of increasing salinity (3% to 11% NaCl) in LB medium at 37°C with aeration (Fig. 1A). It was found that under these conditions V. parahaemolyticus can grow in up to 10.5% NaCl (wt/vol). Next, we examined the NaCl tolerance range of V. parahaemolyticus in M9G containing 3 to 9% NaCl (wt/vol) at 37°C with aeration (Fig. 1B). Under these conditions in M9G, where compatible solutes and their precursors were not exogenously present, V. parahaemolyticus could grow at an upper maximum of 6% NaCl but with an extended lag phase of 5 h (Fig. 1B). This extended lag phase was reduced to 2.5 h or less when ectoine or glycine betaine or their precursors aspartic acid or choline were exogenously supplied (Fig. 1C). These data showed that V. parahaemolyticus cells had a broad salt stress tolerance range when grown in complex media compared with defined media. In addition, these data suggested that V. parahaemolyticus can synthesize both ectoine and glycine betaine, since the addition of their precursors to the media reduced the lag phase in M9G 6% NaCl.
Fig 1.
Growth of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 in LB medium containing 3 to 11% NaCl (A), M9 medium with 0.4% glucose (M9G) containing 3 to 9% NaCl (wt/vol) (B), and M9G with 6% NaCl (M9G 6% NaCl) (C) in the absence or presence of compatible solutes (CS) or their precursors. Symbols: in panel A, open squares, 3% NaCl; closed squares, 6% NaCl; closed stars, 9% NaCl; closed triangles, 10.5% NaCl; open triangles, 11% NaCl; in panel B, open squares, 3% NaCl; open circles, 5.5% NaCl; closed squares, 6% NaCl; filled stars, 9% NaCl; in panel C, closed squares, 6% NaCl; closed triangles, glycine betaine added; closed circles, choline added; open circles, aspartic acid added; open triangles, ectoine added. Values represent the mean optical densities at 595 nm from triplicate technical replicates and at least two biological replicates, and error bars show the standard deviations and may be obscured by symbols.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus synthesizes glutamate and ectoine in response to NaCl stress.
The major compatible solutes synthesized by stationary-phase V. parahaemolyticus cells were investigated by proton NMR (1H-NMR) at 400 MHz in the presence of deuterium oxide (D2O) as the solvent. From cells grown in M9G 1% NaCl, no known major compatible solutes were found to be present (Fig. 2A). Protons corresponding to alanine and other organic compounds were noted, which are likely metabolic products produced in these stationary-phase cells (Fig. 2). In M9G 3% or 6% NaCl, protons peaks corresponding to ectoine and glutamate, as illustrated by their chemical shift values expressed in ppm, were identified (Fig. 2B and C). It also appears that in M9G 6% NaCl, the intensity and peak size increase for ectoine and decrease for glutamate, suggesting that ectoine is produced in a NaCl-dependent manner. Also, an examination of exponential-phase V. parahaemolyticus cells was performed by 1H-NMR, and a similar pattern was found for all three conditions (data not shown).
Fig 2.
400-MHz 1H-NMR spectroscopy of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633. The spectral peaks were recorded for cells grown in M9G 1% NaCl (A), M9G 3% NaCl (B), and M9G 6% NaCl (C). The chemical environments of each type of proton or chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in ppm in the figure. The spectral peaks corresponding to the different compounds are labeled with the names of the compounds.
We determined whether the reduction in the lag phase seen when cells were grown in the presence of choline or aspartic acid was due to conversion of these two precursors to glycine betaine or ectoine, respectively, and not the result of these compounds being used as carbon and energy sources (Fig. 1B). To examine this, V. parahaemolyticus was cultured in M9G 6% NaCl supplemented with 1 mM choline or aspartic acid, and the presence of glycine betaine and ectoine was evaluated by 1H-NMR. It was found that both glycine betaine and ectoine were synthesized in the presence of their respective precursors (data not shown). To address the question of whether V. parahaemolyticus can simultaneously synthesize both ectoine and glycine betaine, V. parahaemolyticus cells were grown in M9G 6% NaCl supplemented with 1 mM choline and 1 mM aspartic acid. By NMR analysis, it was shown that V. parahaemolyticus was able to synthesize both compatible solutes; however, the normalized intensities of the proton peaks corresponding to glycine betaine were much larger than those of the ectoine peaks, suggesting that more glycine betaine was produced than ectoine (Fig. 3).
Fig 3.
400-MHz 1H-NMR spectroscopy of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 grown in the presence of compatible solute precursors. The spectral peaks were recorded for V. parahaemolyticus grown in M9G 6% NaCl supplemented with aspartic acid and choline. The chemical environments of each type of proton or chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in ppm in the figure. The spectral peaks corresponding to the different compounds detected are labeled with the names of the compounds.
To examine whether compatible solutes or their precursors can be used as the sole carbon and energy sources, V. parahaemolyticus cells were grown in M9 1% NaCl medium supplemented with glycine betaine, choline, ectoine, aspartic acid, proline, glutamate, or glutamine as the sole carbon source. We found that glutamate, aspartic acid, and proline could be used as the sole carbon sources. After an 18-h lag phase, V. parahaemolyticus grew poorly in M9 1% NaCl medium supplemented with glutamine. There was no detectable growth from cultures containing choline, ectoine, or glycine betaine as the carbon source. This indicates that ectoine and glycine betaine are bona fide compatible solutes and that choline is used solely as a precursor for glycine betaine synthesis (Fig. 4).
Fig 4.
Growth of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 in M9 1% NaCl supplemented with 20 mM compatible solutes or their precursors as the sole carbon sources. Symbols: closed squares, glucose; open squares, glutamate; closed diamonds, aspartic acid; open triangles, proline; open inverted triangles, glutamine. Some of the following symbols that represent no growth may be obscured; closed circles, no glucose; closed triangles, choline; closed inverted triangles, glycine betaine; open circles, ectoine.
Ectoine synthesis gene ectA is highly expressed in V. parahaemolyticus cells during salt stress.
To determine whether there is differential expression of the ectoine and glycine betaine synthesis genes, we examined expression of ectA and betA genes from cells grown under different salinity conditions. First, we examined expression from log- and stationary-phase cells grown in LB 3% NaCl (Fig. 5A). Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) were utilized to determine the transcript levels of ectA and betA. It was found that both genes in LB were more highly expressed in log-phase cells than in stationary-phase cells (Fig. 5A). Then, expression of these genes was examined under the same conditions after a 30 min up-shock in 6% NaCl. The ectA gene showed increased expression in log- and stationary-phase cells after NaCl up-shock. The betA gene also showed increased expression after NaCl up-shock in log-phase cells, but not in stationary-phase cells (Fig. 5A).
Fig 5.
Expression analysis of ectA and betA genes. (A and B) RT-PCR of ectA and betA from V. parahaemolyticus cells grown to log or stationary phase in LB (A) or M9G (B) and subjected to 30 min up-shock in 6% NaCl. The cDNA templates were diluted 1:25 and 1:125 as indicate by triangles. The 16S rRNA control is shown for each sample. (C) qPCR of ectA and betA from cells grown to log or stationary phase in LB and subjected to 30 min up-shock in 6% NaCl. (D) qPCR of ectA and betA from cells grown to log or stationary phase in M9G and subjected to 30 min up-shock in 6% NaCl. Bars represent the expression of the indicated genes normalized to 16S rRNA and are relative to those of log-phase cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations. P values were calculated using an unpaired Student's t test with a 95% confidence interval. Asterisks denote significant differences as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.02.
Next the expression pattern of ectA and betA was examined in log- and stationary-phase cells grown in M9G 3% NaCl (Fig. 5B). It was found that in defined media, the expression level of ectA was induced in log-phase cells compared to stationary-phase cells, whereas betA showed low levels of expression in log-phase and stationary-phase cells. Similarly, we found differential expression under the same conditions after a 30-min up-shock in 6% NaCl. Both ectA and betA showed increased expression after the NaCl up-shock during log-phase growth with ectA showing the higher level of expression. In stationary-phase cells after the 30 min up-shock in 6% NaCl only, the ectA gene was expressed (Fig. 5B). Using qPCR, we quantified these expression patterns and demonstrated that the ectA gene was statistically more highly expressed under all conditions examined (Fig. 5C and D). For example, ectA showed approximately 200-fold and 60-fold change in expression after NaCl up-shock in complex and defined media, respectively (Fig. 5C and D), whereas under the same conditions, betA showed a 14-fold and 1.75-fold change. Together, these results demonstrated that the expression of both genes was growth phase dependent and induced by NaCl (Fig. 5C and D).
Ectoine synthesis is essential for V. parahaemolyticus growth in high-salt, low-nutrient stress conditions.
We determined whether synthesis of both ectoine and glycine betaine was critical for V. parahaemolyticus growth under osmotic stress. To achieve this, growth of a ΔbetA strain defective in glycine betaine synthesis, a ΔectB strain defective in ectoine synthesis, and a ΔectB-ΔbetA strain defective in both glycine betaine and ectoine synthesis were examined. Growth of the wild-type strain was compared with that of the betA mutant in M9G 6% NaCl medium, and both strains showed comparable growth (Fig. 6A). However, when the ΔbetA strain was cultured in the presence of the precursor choline, no growth occurred, indicating that choline was toxic to the cells, and further examination of these cultures determined that choline was bacteriostatic. To investigate whether this bacteriostatic effect was due to internal accumulation of choline, NMR analysis was performed. Cells were grown to exponential phase in M9G 6% NaCl, pelleted, and resuspended in M9G 6% NaCl supplemented with 1 mM choline for 1 h, and then NMR analysis was performed. Our results indicated that choline had accumulated internally in the betA mutant cells, but no choline was present in wild-type cells grown under the same conditions (data not shown). In M9G 6% NaCl supplemented with glycine betaine, the betA mutant grew better than the wild-type strain, which was demonstrated by a reduction in the lag phase from ∼5 h to ≤1 h (Fig. 6A). In the same medium supplemented with either ectoine or asparatic acid, the ΔbetA strain also had a reduced lag phase but not to the same extent as when the medium was supplemented with glycine betaine (Fig. 6A). Overall, these data suggest that the betaine synthesis system is not essential for growth in high-salt, low-nutrient media. However, glycine betaine is a more effective compatible solute than ectoine in V. parahaemolyticus.
Fig 6.
Growth of ΔbetA (A), ΔectB (B), and ΔbetA-ΔectB (C) strains in M9G 6% NaCl in the presence or absence of compatible solute or their precursors. Symbols: in panel A, closed squares, wild type; open squares, ΔbetA strain; closed circles, ΔbetA strain with choline added; open circles, ΔbetA mutant with ectoine added; closed triangles, ΔbetA strain with glycine betaine added; open triangles, ΔbetA strain with aspartic acid added; in panel B, closed squares, wild type; open squares, ΔectB strain; closed circles, ΔectB strain with choline added; open circles, ΔectB strain with aspartic acid added; closed triangles, ΔectB strain with glycine betaine added; open triangles, ΔectB strain with ectoine added; in panel C, closed squares, ΔbetA ΔectB strain with proline added; open squares, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain with ectoine added; open circles, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain with glycine betaine added; closed circles, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain; closed triangles, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain with glutamate added; closed inverted triangles, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain with choline added; diamonds, ΔbetA-ΔectB strain with aspartic acid added. Values represent the mean optical densities at 595 nm from triplicate technical replicates and at least two biological replicates, and error bars show the standard deviations.
Next, the role of the ectoine synthesis system in the growth of V. parahaemolyticus under high-salt and low-nutrient conditions was investigated. A deletion mutation was constructed previously in the ectB gene, which knocked out the synthesis system (15). This deletion mutant grew similar to the wild-type strain in M9G 3% NaCl, demonstrating that there is no overall growth defect (data not shown). However, it was found that, unlike the betA mutant, the ΔectB strain could not grow in M9G 6% NaCl, suggesting that ectoine synthesis is essential (Fig. 6B). We investigated the importance of both synthesis systems by examination of growth of the ΔectB-ΔbetA strain under the same growth conditions described above. The double mutant grew similar to the wild type in M9G 3% NaCl but showed no growth in M9G plus 6% NaCl (Fig. 6C). The ability of different compatible solutes (glycine betaine, ectoine, proline, glutamate, and glutamine) and their precursors (aspartic acid and choline) to rescue growth of the double mutant in M9G 6% NaCl was tested (Fig. 6C). It was found that in the presence of glycine betaine (open circles), proline (closed squares), ectoine (open squares), or glutamate (closed triangles), the double mutant strain grew (Fig. 6C). The compatible solutes demonstrated the following effectiveness as determined by lag phase time reduction and overall final OD: glycine betaine > proline > ectoine > glutamate. In the presence of ectoine, there was a slight defect in the ΔectB-ΔbetA strain, since the mutant did not show the same reduction in the lag phase as the ΔectB strain (Fig. 6C). In summary, under the conditions examined herein, our data show that the ectoine synthesis system is essential for growth under osmotic stress conditions and ectoine, glycine betaine, and proline are effective compatible solutes used by this species.
The presence of both ectoine and glycine betaine biosynthesis systems is widely distributed among Vibrio spp.
Of the 33 species of the family Vibrionaceae whose complete genome sequences are available in the NCBI genome database, we identified the ectoine cluster alone in 7 species, the glycine betaine cluster alone in 5 species, both gene clusters in 20 species, and neither gene cluster in 1 species (Fig. 7). Depending on the species, the ectoine synthesis system could be present in either chromosome I or II, although for most species it was present in chromosome II. Only in Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and Vibrio harveyi was it contained in chromosome I where it was always adjacent to a BCCT transporter. The ectoine genes were present among all strains of a given species with the exception of V. harveyi HY01 and two strains of Vibrio splendidus. In V. harveyi HY01, the genes appear to be deleted, as we found partial sequence of aspK and a homologue of the BCCT transporter encoded by VP1723 in the expected location on the genome as is present in V. parahaemolyticus. The two strains of V. splendidus have incomplete genome sequences so we cannot speculate on their absence. In cases where it could be determined from the genome sequence, the glycine betaine gene cluster was always present on chromosome II. The genes were present in all representatives of the species. We reconstructed the evolutionary history based on three housekeeping genes, rpoB, mdh, and pyrC, of the 33 species examined. We mapped the distribution of ectoine and betaine biosynthesis gene clusters onto this tree. The predominant distribution is the presence of both systems in most species. This is true for the most divergent species within the group analyzed, Photobacterium angustum and Grimontia hollisae, which strongly suggests that both systems are ancestral (Fig. 7). The presence of only the ectoine system in both V. cholerae and Vibrio mimicus but the presence of both synthesis systems in their close relative Vibrio furnissii suggests that deletion of the betaine synthesis system occurred in the last common ancestor to give rise to these species. A similar evolutionary scenario can be proposed for the presence of only the ectoine system in Vibrio ichthyoenteri, Vibrio sp. strain N418, and Vibrio scophthalmi. It is of interest to note that V. fischeri also contains only the ectoine system, but its closest relative on the tree, Vibrio salmonicida, contains neither the ectoine nor betaine synthesis system. This is the only species examined within this family that contained neither system. Interrogation of the genome sequence of V. salmonicida did uncover a potential proline synthesis system, ProAB and ProI, which would allow the conversion of glutamate to proline for use as a compatible solute.
Fig 7.
Phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated sequences of three housekeeping genes, rpoB, mdh, and pyrC, for 33 species from the family Vibrionaceae. Almost all the species shown in the tree are Vibrio species. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method (55). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1,000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (42). E, ectoine cluster; B, betaine cluster; B1 and E1, chromosome 1; B2 and E2, chromosome 2.
DISCUSSION
Synthesis and accumulation of compatible solutes are widely used by bacteria as a strategy to relieve the growth constraints imposed by increased osmolarity (27, 30, 34, 43, 44). This study showed that the addition of exogenous compatible solutes and their precursors to M9G 6% NaCl resulted in reduction of lag-phase growth, indicating that V. parahaemolyticus is able to transport, accumulate, and synthesize compatible solutes (Fig. 1). Using 1H-NMR analysis, we showed that ectoine and glutamate were synthesized in M9G 6% NaCl. The role of glutamate in osmotic stress has been described, for example in E. coli it acts as a K+ counter anion during the early stage of NaCl stress (45, 46). The moderate halophile Halobacillus halophilus, under moderate salinities accumulates glutamate and glutamine to adjust turgor (47). In this organism, one of the major roles of glutamate is to induce proline synthesis at high-salinity conditions (48). However, in V. parahaemolyticus, the accumulation of glutamate is not sufficient for long-term survival, since the ectB mutant cannot grow in defined media under high-NaCl stress, but the betA mutant can, indicating that ectoine is the main compatible solute synthesized de novo. We examined the NMR profile of wild-type cells grown in the presence of equal concentrations of the precursors aspartic acid and choline and found that both ectoine and glycine betaine can be synthesized simultaneously. We demonstrated that ectoine and glycine betaine are bona fide compatible solutes that along with choline cannot be used as the sole carbon and energy sources, whereas glutamate, aspartic acid, proline, and to a much lesser extent glutamine can be used as the sole carbon sources. The use of choline and glycine betaine as the sole carbon sources in Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been documented and is facilitated in this species by the presence of high-affinity choline and glycine betaine transporters (49–51). This species can also use these substrates as effective compatible solute but cannot synthesize them de novo.
V. parahaemolyticus can synthesize ectoine and can synthesize glycine betaine from choline and does so quite effectively but cannot use these compounds as the sole carbon sources. However, as our data have shown, V. parahaemolyticus can use proline as the sole carbon source and an effective compatible solute, but it cannot synthesize it de novo. Since V. parahaemolyticus contains at least six putative compatible solute transporters, uptake of proline may be an important osmotic tolerance strategy for this organism, which needs to be examined further (18, 25, 52).
We showed that both ectA and betA are constitutively expressed in LB and M9 media, and both are more highly expressed in log-phase cells than in stationary-phase cells. Although we did find that the NaCl up-shock induces expression of both genes under all conditions examined, it was found that the ectA gene was always more highly expressed than betA. Together with the growth assay and NMR analyses, these data demonstrated that ectoine synthesis is critical for growth under osmotic stress conditions.
The contribution of both V. parahaemolyticus synthesis systems to high-salt stress survival was examined via the use of in-frame single and double deletion mutants. These data indicated that the glycine betaine synthesis system was not essential for growth under osmotic stress conditions. We found that the ΔectB strain did not grow under high-NaCl stress conditions, indicating that this system is essential. To determine whether there was any cumulative effect in deleting both ectB and betA, we examined the double mutant and found that the addition of glycine betaine restored growth similar to wild-type levels. We also found that the addition of proline was highly effective in rescuing the double mutant, indicating that this is a powerful osmotic tolerance solute in this species. Glutamate could rescue the double mutant somewhat, but the data suggest that this solute is likely not an important compatible solute for this organism. Overall, these data indicate that glycine betaine, proline, ectoine, and to a much lesser extent glutamate can act as compatible solutes in V. parahaemolyticus.
Previously, it was suggested that the ability to synthesize ectoine is specific for halophilic bacteria and the results of our analysis suggest that it is essential for moderate halophile survival (27, 53). In our analysis of the distribution of EctA and BetA among the family Vibrionaceae, we found that of 33 species examined, 20 species contained both systems with nearly 70% containing the ectoine system. Of 284 species of Gammaproteobacteria species examined, we found 43% contained the ectoine synthesis genes, indicating that its prevalence is much higher in Vibrio species. We did find that most species examined did encode both systems, including P. angustum and G. hollisae, the two most divergent species, which suggests that both systems are ancestral and important for these diverse marine organisms.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Steve Bai at the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Core Facility, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, for help and assistance with NMR analysis. We thank Megan R. Carpenter for constructing the housekeeping gene tree.
This work was funded by the Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) in Membrane Protein Production and Characterization at the University of Delaware (grant P30 GM103519). Research on Vibrio stress response mechanisms is supported by National Science Foundation grant IOS-0918429 to E.F.B.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 14 June 2013
REFERENCES
- 1. Krantz GE, Colwell RR, Lovelace E. 1969. Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the blue crab Callinectes sapidus in Chesapeake Bay. Science 164:1286–1287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kaneko T, Colwell RR. 1973. Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay. J. Bacteriol. 113:24–32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kaneko T, Colwell RR. 1975. Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay. Appl. Microbiol. 30:251–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Colwell RR, Kaper JB, Joseph A. 1977. Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and other vibrios: occurrence and distribution in Chesapeake. Science 198:394–396 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Joseph SW, Colwell RR, Kaper JB. 1982. Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related halophilic vibrios. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 10:77–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. DePaola A, Kaysner CA, Bowers J, Cook DW. 2000. Environmental investigations of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters after outbreaks in Washington, Texas, and New York (1997 and 1998). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4649–4654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. DePaola A, Nordstrom JL, Bowers JC, Wells JG, Cook DW. 2003. Seasonal abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Alabama oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1521–1526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Johnson CN, Bowers JC, Griffitt KJ, Molina V, Clostio RW, Pei S, Laws E, Paranjpye RN, Strom MS, Chen A, Hasan NA, Huq A, Noriea NF, III, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR. 2012. Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in the coastal and estuarine waters of Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, and Washington (United States). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:7249–7257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Turner JW, Paranjpye RN, Landis ED, Biryukov SV, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Nilsson WB, Strom MS. 2013. Population structure of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the Pacific Northwest coast of the United States. PLoS One 8:e55726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ellis CN, Schuster BM, Striplin MJ, Jones SH, Whistler CA, Cooper VS. 2012. Influence of seasonality on the genetic diversity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in New Hampshire shellfish waters as determined by multilocus sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:3778–3782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Colwell RR. 1996. Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science 274:2025–2031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Colwell RR, Epstein PR, Gubler D, Maynard N, McMichael AJ, Patz JA, Sack RB, Shope R. 1998. Climate change and human health. Science 279:968–969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Constantin de Magny G, Colwell RR. 2009. Cholera and climate: a demonstrated relationship. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 120:119–128 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Harvell CD, Kim K, Burkholder JM, Colwell RR, Epstein PR, Grimes DJ, Hofmann EE, Lipp EK, Osterhaus AD, Overstreet RM, Porter JW, Smith GW, Vasta GR. 1999. Emerging marine diseases—climate links and anthropogenic factors. Science 285:1505–1510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lobitz B, Beck L, Huq A, Wood B, Fuchs G, Faruque AS, Colwell R. 2000. Climate and infectious disease: use of remote sensing for detection of Vibrio cholerae by indirect measurement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:1438–1443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pascual M, Rodo X, Ellner SP, Colwell R, Bouma MJ. 2000. Cholera dynamics and El Nino-Southern Oscillation. Science 289:1766–1769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. McLaughlin J, DePaola A, Bopp C, Martinek K, Napolilli N, Allison C, Murray S, Thompson E, Bird M, Middaugh J. 2005. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:1463–1470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Whitaker WB, Parent MA, Naughton LM, Richards GP, Blumerman SL, Boyd EF. 2010. Modulation of responses of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 to pH and temperature stresses by growth at different salt concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:4720–4729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mahoney JC, Gerding MJ, Jones SH, Whistler CA. 2010. Comparison of the pathogenic potentials of environmental and clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains indicates a role for temperature regulation in virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7459–7465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Daniels NA, Ray B, Easton A, Marano N, Kahn E, McShan AL, Del Rosario L, Baldwin T, Kingsley MA, Puhr ND, Wells JG, Angulo FJ. 2000. Emergence of a new Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype in raw oysters: a prevention quandary. JAMA 284:1541–1545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Daniels NA, MacKinnon L, Bishop R, Altekruse S, Ray B, Hammond RM, Thompson S, Wilson S, Bean NH, Griffin PM, Slutsker L. 2000. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973–1998. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1661–1666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Su Y, Liu CY. 2007. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol. 24:549–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yeung PS, Boor KJ. 2004. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 1:74–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Boyd EF, Cohen ALV, Naughton LM, Ussery DW, Binnewies TT, Stine OC, Parent MA. 2008. Molecular analysis of the emergence of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiol. 8:110. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Naughton LM, Blumerman SL, Carlberg M, Boyd EF. 2009. Osmoadaptation among Vibrio species: unique genomic features and physiological responses of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:2802–2810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Reen FJ, Almagro-Moreno S, Ussery D, Boyd EF. 2006. The genomic code: inferring Vibrionaceae niche specialization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:697–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. da Costa MS, Santos H, Galinski EA. 1998. An overview of the role and diversity of compatible solutes in Bacteria and Archaea. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 61:117–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Galinski E, Oren A. 1991. Isolation and structure determination of a novel compatible solute from the moderately halophilic purple sulfur bacterium Ectothiorhodospira marismortui. Eur. J. Biochem. 198:593–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Galinski EA. 1995. Osmoadaptation in bacteria. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 37:272–328 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sleator RD, Hill C. 2002. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26:49–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Roberts MF. 2004. Osmoadaptation and osmoregulation in archaea: update 2004. Front. Biosci. 9:1999–2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Roberts MF. 2005. Organic compatible solutes of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms. Saline Systems 1:5. 10.1186/1746-1448-1-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bhaganna P, Volkers RJ, Bell AN, Kluge K, Timson DJ, McGrath JW, Ruijssenaars HJ, Hallsworth JE. 2010. Hydrophobic substances induce water stress in microbial cells. Microb. Biotechnol. 3:701–716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wood JM. 2007. Bacterial osmosensing transporters. Methods Enzymol. 428:77–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pflughoeft KJ, Kierek K, Watnick PI. 2003. Role of ectoine in Vibrio cholerae osmoadaptation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5919–5927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chin JP, Megaw J, Magill CL, Nowotarski K, Williams JP, Bhaganna P, Linton M, Patterson MF, Underwood GJ, Mswaka AY, Hallsworth JE. 2010. Solutes determine the temperature windows for microbial survival and growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:7835–7840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hoffmann T, Bremer E. 2011. Protection of Bacillus subtilis against cold stress via compatible-solute acquisition. J. Bacteriol. 193:1552–1562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kuhlmann AU, Bursy J, Gimpel S, Hoffmann T, Bremer E. 2008. Synthesis of the compatible solute ectoine in Virgibacillus pantothenticus is triggered by high salinity and low growth temperature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4560–4563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T, Tagomori K, Iijima Y, Najima M, Nakano M, Yamashita A, Kubota Y, Kimura S, Yasunaga T, Honda T, Shinagawa H, Hattori M, Iida T. 2003. Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V. cholerae. Lancet 361:743–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pfaffl M. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45. 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731–2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wood JM, Bremer E, Csonka LN, Kraemer R, Poolman B, van der Heide T, Smith LT. 2001. Osmosensing and osmoregulatory compatible solute accumulation by bacteria. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 130:437–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kempf B, Bremer E. 1998. Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch. Microbiol. 170:319–330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. McLaggan D, Naprstek J, Buurman E, Epstein W. 1994. Interdependence of K+ and glutamate accumulation during osmotic adaptation of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1911–1917 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lucht JM, Bremer E. 1994. Adaptation of Escherichia coli to high osmolarity environments: osmoregulation of the high-affinity glycine betaine transport system proU. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 14:3–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Saum SH, Müller V. 2008. Regulation of osmoadaptation in the moderate halophile Halobacillus halophilus: chloride, glutamate and switching osmolyte strategies. Saline Systems 4:4. 10.1186/1746-1448-4-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Saum SH, Müller V. 2007. Salinity-dependent switching of osmolyte strategies in a moderately halophilic bacterium: glutamate induces proline biosynthesis in Halobacillus halophilus. J. Bacteriol. 189:6968–6975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen C, Malek AA, Wargo MJ, Hogan DA, Beattie GA. 2010. The ATP-binding cassette transporter Cbc (choline/betaine/carnitine) recruits multiple substrate-binding proteins with strong specificity for distinct quaternary ammonium compounds. Mol. Microbiol. 75:29–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Malek AA, Chen C, Wargo MJ, Beattie GA, Hogan DA. 2011. Roles of three transporters, CbcXWV, BetT1, and BetT3, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa choline uptake for catabolism. J. Bacteriol. 193:3033–3041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wargo MJ, Hogan DA. 2009. Identification of genes required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa carnitine catabolism. Microbiology 155:2411–2419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Whitaker WB, Boyd EF. 2012. Adaptations to environmental changes: stress response mechanisms among Vibrio species, p 201–227 In Requena JM. (ed), Stress response in microbiology. Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
- 53. Pastor JM, Salvador M, Argandona M, Bernal V, Reina-Bueno M, Csonka LN, Iborra JL, Vargas C, Nieto JJ, Canovas M. 2010. Ectoines in cell stress protection: uses and biotechnological production. Biotechnol. Adv. 28:782–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Philippe N, Alcaraz JP, Coursange E, Geiselmann J, Schneider D. 2004. Improvement of pCVD442, a suicide plasmid for gene allele exchange in bacteria. Plasmid 51:246–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







