Abstract

This report describes the preparation of a series of 17 novel racemic spirocyclic scaffolds that are intended for the creation of compound libraries by parallel synthesis for biological screening. Each scaffold features two points of orthogonal diversification. The scaffolds are related to each other in four ways:
Through stepwise changes in the size of the nitrogen bearing ring.
Through the oxidation state of the carbon centered point of diversification.
Through the relative stereochemical orientation of the two diversification sites in those members that are stereogenic.
Through the provision of both saturated and unsaturated versions of the furan ring in the scaffold series derived from 3-piperidone.
The scaffolds provide incremental changes in the relative orientation of the diversity components that would be introduced onto them. The scaffolds feature high sp3 carbon content which is essential for the three dimensional exploration of chemical space. This characteristic is particularly evident in those members of this family that bear two stereocenters, i.e. the two series derived from 3-piperidone and 3-pyrrolidinone. In the series derived from 3-piperidone we were able to “split the difference” between the two diastereomers by preparation of their corresponding unsaturated version.
Introduction
The exploration of chemical space is often invoked by workers in high throughput synthesis as a goal in library design. Chemical space can be envisioned as the microscopic volume enveloping a molecule. As a molecule undergoes dynamic changes the envelope follows. Flexible molecules have flexible space whereas rigid molecules have more static space.
The latter case enables controlled explorations of the relationship between spatial placement and molecular properties. Static space can be surveyed by introducing incremental changes into a well-defined molecule at its core, or scaffold, which orients its peripheral substituents. The relative placement of peripheral substituents, both to the scaffold and each other, determines the molecule’s properties. Diversity in compound libraries generally includes variation of substituents around a scaffold, imparting certain characteristics such as degrees of lipophilicity or hydrophilicity. Carefully choosing the peripheral elements reveals the effect of their associated properties and placement on the properties of the molecule.
Spirocycles are ideal for this purpose. These molecules feature structural complexity with incrementally variable placement of substituents.1,2 Accessible carbons can serve as a “hinge” for “swinging” substituents in localized arcs as illustrated in Figure 1. A substituent X can be oriented above, below or, in the unsaturated case, within the plane of the page. This is analogous to a door which rests on hinges. The wall to which the hinges are attached is rigid while the hinges serve as the point of flexibility. The three positions shown in Figure 1 define an arc of about 110° at the extremes and are distinct if the spiro carbon is stereogenic. Synthesis of all three variations will reveal the effect on this molecule’s properties of swinging X through the arc.
Figure 1.

Representation of a family of spirocyclic scaffolds
Our goal was to prepare a family of related novel spirocyclic scaffolds that would offer the opportunity to effect incremental changes in the molecular architecture of derived compound libraries. We were attracted to the idea that scaffolds having a high proportion of saturated (sp3) carbons would enable the exploration of three dimensional space.3 We chose 1-Boc-3-piperidone at the outset: first, because spirocyclization creates a stereocenter and, second, in searching the online literature we found that simple spirocyclic derivatives of 3-piperidone are relatively uncommon, especially when compared to those derived from 4-piperidone. This report details our work towards deriving both saturated and unsaturated spirocyclic scaffolds that correspond to those shown in Figure 1 from protected 2-N-substituted cyclic ketones like 1-Boc-3-piperidone and its lower homologs.
Results and Discussion
Spirocyclic tetrahydrofuran (THF) scaffolds derived from N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones
All spiro-THF scaffolds were constructed from N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones as shown in Scheme 1. The cyclic ketones 1-3 were added to homoallyl magnesium bromide4 that was preexposed to CeCl3 to furnish tertiary alcohols 4-6.5 Epoxidation with mCPBA, followed by spontaneous epoxide ring opening via a Baldwin favored 5-exo-tet nucleophilic attack,6 afforded the racemic spirocyclic THF methanols 7-9.7 In no case was any evidence observed for the formation of tetrahydropyran products via the alternative 6-endo-tet ring closure mechanism. The diastereomers of 7 and 8 were separated. Further oxidation, under different conditions, of 10a/10b, 11a/11b and 9 afforded the aldehydes 12a/12b, 13a/13b and 14 or the acids 15a/15b, 16a/16b and 17.8 The behavior of the three sets of scaffolds was sufficiently distinct that each case is described individually.
Scheme 1.
General synthesis scheme of racemic spiro-THF scaffolds from N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones
Spirocyclic THFs derived from N-Boc-3-piperidone (1)
Addition of N-Boc-3-piperidone 1 to a pre-formed mixture of freshly prepared homoallyl Grignard reagent and CeCl3 gave the tertiary alcohol 4 (Scheme 2). In the absence of CeCl3 the Grignard reagent addition to ketone 1 was lower yielding (≈25%) with the formation of significant quantities of the reduction product N-Boc-3-piperidinol.9 We were delighted to find that treatment of 4 with mCPBA at ambient temperature spontaneously afforded only the alcohols 7 as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. These were readily separated, affording 10a and 10b. The epoxide intermediate was never detected during the reaction by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The relative stereochemistries of 10a and 10b were established by correlation NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography as discussed below.
Scheme 2.

Racemic spiro-THF scaffolds derived from N-Boc-3-piperidone 1
Alcohol 10a was oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde 12a or the acid 15a under different conditions. Alcohol 10b, under the same conditions, gave evidence (1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude product) of the formation of aldehyde 12b as expected. However, we were unable to isolate 12b in satisfactory purity for full characterization purposes. It seemed that 12b was insufficiently stable to be purified by column chromatography. The acid 15b, by contrast, was stable and fully characterized. We recommend that aldehyde 12b be generated and promptly used without column chromatography.
In silico modeling of 10a and 10b using the MM2 force field indicate that H9 faces C2 in the former and C4 in the latter. In the model structure for 10a the 1H-1H distance between H9 and the pro-S H2 methylene is less than 3.3 Å, whereas the distance between H9 and either the pro-R or pro-S H4 methylene is greater than 4.5 Å, leading to the prediction of a strong or medium NOE between H9 and H2 and a weak or no NOE between H9 and H4 for 10a. On the other hand, in the model structure for 10b the 1H-1H distance between H9 and either the pro-R or pro-S H2 methylene is greater than 4.5 Å, whereas the distance between H9 and the pro-R H4 methylene is less than 3.3 Å, leading to the prediction of a strong or medium NOE between H9 and H4 and a weak or no NOE between H9 and H2 (Figure 2). On the basis of these observations, through-space interactions measured using the nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) were employed in lieu of a dihedral angle-based approach for relative diastereospecific assignment of these spirocycles. Due to spectral overlap it is not possible to unambiguously assign these diastereomers using 1D 1H selective and 2D 1H-1H NOESY at 500 and 800 MHz. Going to higher dimensionality resolves crowded spectra. A 3D 1H-13C-1H HSQC-NOESY spectrum was acquired for 10a and 10b. A 2D strip of the 3D data at the 13C frequency corresponding to C2 for 10a was generated (see SI). There was a resonance to H9, indicating that H2 and H9 are close in space for 10a. The analogous strip for 10b shows no resonance that can be assigned to H9, indicating that H2 and H9 are not close in space for 10b (see SI). 2D strips at the 13C frequency corresponding to C4 for 10a and 10b, respectively, were also generated (see SI). For 10a, there is no resonance corresponding to H9, indicating that H4 and H9 are not close in space. For 10b, there is a peak corresponding to H9, indicating that H4 and H9 are close in space. Overall, the 3D HSQC-NOESY indicates convincingly that diastereomers 10a and 10b possess the structures shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Distances between H’s on C9, C4 and C2 in Å as measured by MM2 models.
As an additional check on the 3D HSQC-NOESY data, compound 10a was converted via ester 18a to the HCl salt 19a (Scheme 3). Lyophilization of 19a followed by recrystallization afforded crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction (see SI, Figure S3), confirming the stereochemical assignment.
Scheme 3.
Preparation of 19a
Spirocyclic THFs derived from N-Boc-3-pyrrolidinone (2)
N-Boc-3-pyrrolidinone 2 was exposed to homoallyl magnesium bromide in the presence of CeCl3 as described above, giving the tertiary alcohol 5 (Scheme 4). mCPBA treatment of 5 afforded the diastereomers 8 without the intermediate epoxide being detected by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Our attempts to separate diastereomers 8 by various normal or reverse phase chromatographic methods were unsuccessful. Instead, the mixture of diastereomers 8 was converted to the corresponding p-OMe-benzoyl esters 20 which were separated by normal phase chromatography, providing the individual diastereomers 21a and 21b. Ester hydrolysis regenerated the alcohols as the single diastereomers 11a and 11b. Each diastereomer was oxidized to either its corresponding aldehyde 13a and 13b or acid 16a and 16b as shown.
Scheme 4.
Racemic spiro-THF scaffolds from N-Boc-3-pyrrolidinone 2
Aldehydes 13a and 13b, under normal handling conditions, gave evidence of instability. The two aldehydes could be prepared and isolated but storage for a few days at rt produced changes in the 1H NMR spectrum that suggested the formation of other unidentified materials. We recommend that aldehydes 13a and 13b be used soon after preparation and preferably without column chromatography. Alcohols 11a and 11b as well as acids 16a and 16b did not show evidence of similar behavior.10
The unambiguous assignment of the relative stereochemistry for the two isomers 11a and 11b by various 1D, 2D and 3D NMR experiments could not be made. Instead ester 21a was N-deprotected and converted to the HCl salt 22a, which was lyophilized to afford crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography (Scheme 5). Thus, 21a has the relative stereochemistry shown in Scheme 5 (see SI). Its precursor 11a has the relative stereochemistry shown in Scheme 4 and 11b has the opposite relative stereochemistry.
Scheme 5.

Preparation of 22a
Spirocyclic THFs derived from N-Boc-3-azetidinone (3)
N-Boc-3-azetidinone 3 was exposed to homoallyl magnesium bromide/CeCl3 as described above to afford the tertiary alcohol 6 (Scheme 6). In this case we anticipated that the ring strain present in 3 might render the use of cerium less critical than for 1. The Grignard reagent in the absence of CeCl3 afforded 6 in 53% yield. This yield was better than that obtained using the Grignard alone with 1 but the improvement was insufficient to cause discontinuation of the cerium modification. Epoxidation of 6 afforded the intermediate epoxide (not shown) which, unlike in the cases of 4 and 5, could be observed, even after 24 h, as a mixture with 9 by 1H NMR spectroscopy (epoxide: δ 2.98-2.88 (m, 1H), 2.77 (dd, J = 4.7. 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (dd, J = 4.7, 2.8 Hz, 1H)).. Aging of the reaction for 48 h was required to achieve full conversion to 9. Oxidation of 9 as described above gave the aldehyde 14 and the carboxylic acid 17.11
Scheme 6.

Racemic spiro-THF scaffolds derived from N-Boc-3-azetidinone 3
Aldehyde 14 displayed evidence of instability. During an attempt to use variable temperature NMR to coalesce rotamer populations, solutions of 14 in DMSO-d6 heated above 50 °C rapidly darkened with loss of recognizable spectral signals. Further studies showed that while 14 could be reproducibly generated and isolated, storage, even at 0 °C, led to changes in the 1H NMR spectrum that suggested decomposition. Aldehyde 14 should, when prepared, be used without delay. Alcohol 9 and acid 17 had no corresponding liability.
Spirocyclic dihydrofuran (DHF) scaffolds derived from N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones
The synthetic plan for spiro-DHF containing scaffolds is shown in Scheme 7. The sequence began with the N-Boc protected spirocyclic 3-furanones 23-25 which were prepared from N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones 1-3 as previously reported by this laboratory.12 The 3-furanones were converted to their corresponding tosylhydrazones (not shown) which were obtained as mixtures of geometric isomers. These were treated with base to give the enol ethers 26, 27 and 28, which were isolated in the indicated overall yields.13 Our plan was to lithiate 26-28 at the enol ether α position using the method of Paquette, which was the most closely related precedent, and formylate them to afford the derived aldehydes.14,15 Reduction or oxidation16 would provide the alcohols or acids respectively.
Scheme 7.
Synthesis of spiro-DHF scaffolds from N-Boc protected spirocyclic 3-furanones
Enol ether 26 was used as a model for optimizing the tert-BuLi lithiation required to complete the synthesis. Deuterium incorporation was measured by quenching the carbanion with CD3OD and examination of the relative integration of the enol ether signals in the 1H NMR spectrum. In particular, the signal of the α proton at δ 6.24 (CDCl3) was diagnostic. We developed conditions that gave both 100% deuterium incorporation and high mass recovery (90%). Application of these conditions to formylation of 26 with DMF gave aldehyde 29, although switching to N-formylpiperidine improved the yield of the reaction. Reduction of 29 afforded alcohol 32 whereas oxidation afforded acid 33. Further optimization of this sequence was not pursued.
Turning attention to enol ethers 27 and 28, neither afforded significant amounts of 30 or 31. The reasons for the behavior of these last two substrates were not systematically investigated. However, an indicator of unusual reactivity was observed during the lithiation of 28. A small amount of a compound identified by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy as 34 (Figure 3) was isolated suggesting that lithiated 28 is exceptionally reactive. This reactivity could cause unproductive processes to occur such as this unexpected Boc transfer.
Figure 3.

Byproduct from lithiation/formylation reaction of 28.
Conclusions
We have successfully synthesized a series of 17 new spirocyclic scaffolds derived from three N-Boc protected cyclic 2-aminoketones. These scaffolds can be prepared in sufficient quantities for further elaboration. This constitutes a method of constructing building blocks for exploring chemical space incrementally in three dimensions. In particular the fully saturated THF containing scaffolds could be obtained in amounts that are suitable for diversification using parallel synthesis. Syntheses of compound libraries derived from some of these core scaffolds have been completed within our laboratory and will be the subject of a separate report.
Experimental Section
General Methods
All air and moisture sensitive reactions were carried out in flame- or oven-dried glassware under argon atmosphere using standard gas tight syringes, cannula, and septa. Stirring was achieved with oven-dried, magnetic stir bars. mCPBA was purchased as a 70%–75% by weight product. CH2Cl2 was purified by passage through a purification system employing activated Al2O3. Flash column chromatography was performed with SiO2 from Sorbent Technology (30930M-25, Silica Gel 60A, 40–63 μm) or by using an automated chromatography instrument with an appropriately sized column. Thin layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60F254 plates (EM-5717, Merck). Non-UV active compounds were visualized on TLC using KMnO4 stain. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on instruments operating at 400 or 500 MHz and 100 or 125 MHz respectively. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) spectra were obtained on an ESI-TOF mass spectrometer. The analytical method utilized a Waters Aquity BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50mm, 1.7 μm) eluting with a linear gradient of 95% water (modified to pH 9.8 through addition of NH4OH) to 100% CH3CN at 0.6 mL/min flow rate where purity was determined using UV peak area at 214 nm.
3-Butenylmagnesium bromide
3-Butenylmagnesium bromide was prepared by the reported procedure.4 A 100 mL rb flask was fitted with a reflux condenser and dropping funnel with pressure equalizing side arm atop the condenser. The flask was charged with Mg powder (0.293 g, 12.1 mmol) which was activated by adding 1–2 mol% of iodine. After 5 min, THF (15 mL) was added. A solution of 4-bromobutene (1.02 mL, 10 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was added using a dropping funnel. Addition was carried out at a rate sufficient to maintain a gentle reflux. After complete addition the mixture was heated to reflux for 1 h. The solution was cooled to rt and used for further reactions.
Procedure for the preparation of alcohols (4) and (5)
A suspension of anhydrous powdered CeCl3 (2.56 g, 10.34 mmol) in THF (30 mL) was stirred at rt under argon for 18 h giving a thick, finely divided white suspension. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C and a solution of 3-butenylmagnesium bromide (10.34 mmol) in THF was added dropwise via canula. The resulting suspension was stirred at this temperature for 2 h. A solution of the ketone (1) or (2) (5.17 mmol) in THF (10.0 mL) was added dropwise by syringe and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h, then slowly warmed to rt. After 1 h at rt the mixture was quenched with 5% aq AcOH (10 mL). The organic layer was separated and the aq layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (1 × 10 mL), satd aq NaHCO3 (1 × 10 mL) and brine (1 × 10 mL), then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. Filtration of the mixture followed by evaporation of the solvent gave the crude product which was purified by flash column chromatography using 20%–40% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent to give the desired compound.
tert-Butyl 3-(but-3-en-1-yl)-3-hydroxypiperidine-1-carboxylate (4)
(0.90 g, 67%, colorless oil); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 5.85 (ddt, J = 16.8, 10.1, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (dq, J = 10.3, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.86-3.43 (m, 2H), 2.99 (br s, 2H), 2.22-2.17 (m, 2H), 1.83-1.67 (m, 3H), 1.59-1.53 (m, 3H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (DMSO, 125 MHz, 85 °C) δ 154.8, 139.9, 114.2, 78.8, 68.9, 53.8, 44.1, 37.9, 36.3, 28.7, 27.2, 21.9; IR (neat): 3405, 2977, 1671, 1407 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ C14H26NO3)+ 256.1913, found 256.1892.
tert-Butyl 3-(but-3-en-1-yl)-3-hydroxypyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (5)
(1.11 g, 90%, colorless oil, mixture of rotamers). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 5.87 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (dq, J = 10.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.57 - 3.45 (m, 2H), 3.43-3.34 (m, 1H), 3.24 (dd, J = 21.5, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (p, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.91-1.87 (m, 1H), 1.75 (ddt, J = 16.8, 11.9, 7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.7, 154.6, 138.39, 138.37, 115.2, 115.1, 79.9, 79.3, 79.1, 58.1, 57.8, 44.7, 44.2, 38.1, 37.9, 37.5, 28.9, 28.8, 28.5; IR (neat) 3406, 2979, 1671, 1407 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ C13H24NO3)+ 242.1756, found 242.1746.
tert-Butyl 3-(but-3-en-1-yl)-3-hydroxyazetidine-1-carboxylate (6)
A suspension of anhydrous powdered CeCl3 (0.493 g, 2.0 mmol) in THF (5.0 mL) was stirred for 18 h. The resulting white suspension was cooled to −78 °C and a THF solution of 3-butenylmagnesium bromide (0.203 mL, 2.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The resulting suspension was stirred for an additional 2 h at −78 °C. A solution of (3) (0.171 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL) was added dropwise at −78 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C. The reaction was allowed to warm slowly to rt with stirring over a period of 16 h. The mixture was quenched with 5% aq AcOH (5 mL). The organic layer was separated and the aq layers were extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O, satd aq NaHCO3, brine and then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. Filtration of the mixture and evaporation of the solvent provided a pale yellow solid that was purified by silica gel column chromatography (40% EtOAc/hexanes) to give alcohol (6) as a colorless oil that crystallizes on standing (0.166 g, 0.730 mmol, 73%). mp = 71.5–74.0 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 5.95 - 5.82 (m, 1H), 5.12 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (dq, J = 10.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (br d, ½ AB, J = 9.9 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (br d, ½ AB, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H), 2.22 (br dq, Jq = 9.4 Hz, Jd = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 2.25 - 2.19 (m, 2H), 2.01 (br s, 1H), 1.93 - 1.85 (m, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz, 85 °C) δ 156.4, 139.1, 114.8, 78.8, 69.5, 62.5, 38.4, 28.6, 27.8; IR (neat) 3405, 2977, 1671, 1407 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ C12H22NO3)+ 228.1600, found 228.1593.
Using the above procedure but with omission of CeCl3 gave alcohol (6) in 53% yield.
General Procedure for the Preparation of Spiro Alcohols (8), (10a), (10b)
To a solution of alcohol (4) or (5) (4.31 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) at rt was added mCPBA (1.59 g, 70 wt%, 6.45 mmol) in one portion. The resulting solution was stirred for 22 h during which time a white precipitate formed. Aliquots were withdrawn and evaporated in vacuo for 1H NMR spectroscopy to confirm consumption of the olefin (diagnostic olefin signals as reported above). Additional charges of mCPBA were added if required. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and satd aq NaHCO3 (10 mL) was added. The organic layer was removed and the aq layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with brine and then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. Filtration of the mixture followed by evaporation of the solvent gave a viscous oil which was purified by flash chromatography using 50%–80% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent.
tert-Butyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-7-carboxylate (8)
Using the above procedure with (5) as starting material, silica gel chromatography with 80% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent gave 0.95 g (83%) of an inseparable mixture of the two diastereomers (8).
tert-Butyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7-carboxylate (10a)
Using the above procedure, with (4) as starting material, the crude product was chromatographed on silica gel (60% EtOAc/hexanes) to give (10a) (0.39 g, 35%, the more retained isomer, pale yellow oil, mixture of rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 4.15 (br s, 1H), 3.70-3.66 (m, 1H), 3.53 - 3.35 (m, 3H), 3.23 - 3.08 (m, 2H), 2.01 (br s, 1H), 1.88 - 1.62 (m, 7H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.8, 81.2, 79.4, 78.5, 65.1, 52.0, 51.1, 44.3, 43.3, 36.7, 33.7, 28.4, 26.8, 23.2; IR (neat): 3444, 2933, 1688, 1670 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ C14H26NO4)+ 272.1862, found 272.1851.
tert-Butyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7-carboxylate (10b)
Using the above procedure, with (4) as starting material, the crude product was chromatographed on silica gel (60% EtOAc/hexanes) to give (10b) (0.43g, 37%, the less retained isomer, pale yellow oil); 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ 4.08 (td, J = 7.3, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.73 - 3.40 (m, 4H), 3.29 - 3.01 (m, 2H), 2.13 - 1.60 (m, 7H) 1.48 (s, 10H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz, 85 °C) δ 154.8, 80.8, 80.1, 79.0, 64.8, 53.4, 43.9, 36.4, 34.2, 28.7, 27.8, 23.1; IR (neat): 3407, 2934, 1691, 1670, 1424 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ C14H26NO4)+ 272.1862, found 272.1850.
tert-Butyl 6-(hydroxymethyl)-5-oxa-2-azaspiro[3.4]octane-2-carboxylate (9)
mCPBA (1.35 g, 70 wt%, 5.48 mmol) was added in one portion to a solution of (6) (0.5 g, 2.20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL). The resulting solution was stirred for 48 h during which time a white precipitate formed. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and satd aq NaHCO3 (10 mL) was added. The organic layer was removed and the aq layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. Filtration of the mixture followed by evaporation of the solvent in vacuo gave a viscous oil that was purified by flash chromatography (10–45% EtOAc/hexanes) to give (9) (0.23 g, 0.945 mmol, 43%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 4.15 (ddd, J = 4.8, 3.5, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J = 17.6, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 3.91 - 3.86 (m, 2H), 3.71 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (dd, J = 11.7, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.19 - 2.08 (m, 2H), 2.01 - 1.94 (m, 1H), 1.76 (dd, J = 12.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz, 85 °C) δ 156.2, 80.7, 78.9, 78.6, 64.3, 62.8, 62.2, 35.6, 28.6, 27.2; IR (neat) 3427, 2974, 1678, 1392 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (2M + H)+ (C24H43N2O8)+ 487.3019, found 487.3028 (base peak); m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C12H22NO4)+ 245.1549, found 245.1575.
tert-Butyl 2-(((4-methoxybenzoyl)oxy)methyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7-carboxylate (18a)
para-Methoxybenzoyl chloride (0.23 g, 1.38 mmol) was added to a solution of alcohol (10a) (0.187 g, 0.689 mmol) in dry py (2 mL) at rt under Ar. After 19 h, py was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was diluted with DCM (5 mL) and water (5 mL). The organic layer was recovered and the aq layer was extracted with DCM (2 × 5 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with 0.5 N aq HCl (2 × 10 mL), water (1 × 10 mL) and brine (1 × 10 mL), then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. After filtration of the mixture, all volatiles were evaporated in vacuo and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 20–40% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent to give 0.24 g (86%) of pure compound (18a) (0.24 g, 86%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.95 – 7.91 (m, 2H), 6.86 – 6.83 (m, 2H), 4.32 – 4.17 (m, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.60 – 3.35 (m, 2H), 3.03 (t, J = 14.2 Hz, 2H), 2.08 (br s, 1H), 1.90 – 1.77 (m, 2H), 1.73 – 1.54 (m, 5H), 1.38 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.2, 163.4, 155.1, 131.7, 122.5, 113.6, 81.5, 79.4, 76.1, 66.8, 55.4, 36.8, 33.1, 28.5, 27.8, 23.4; IR (neat) 2976, 1712, 1688, 1605, 1251, 1163 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C22H32NO6)+ 406.2229, found 406.2247.
2-(((4-methoxybenzoyl)oxy)methyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decan-7-ium chloride (19a)
TFA (0.31 mL, 4.05 mmol) was added to a solution of (18a) (69 mg, 0.17 mmol) in DCM (2 mL) at rt. The reaction mixture slowly became light yellow and was stirred at rt for 1 h. All volatiles were removed in vacuo. Saturated aq NaHCO3 (4 mL) was added and the solution was stirred at rt for 2 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with DCM (3 × 3 mL). The organic extracts were evaporated to give the free amine which was suspended in deionized water (1 mL) and acidified with 0.1 N aq HCl to pH ~2 (by pH meter). The mixture was stirred further for 30 min until homogenous and then lyophilized over a period of 48 h to give a clear viscous oil. The oil was layered with isopropyl acetate and heated to just below reflux, then MeOH was slowly added dropwise until homogenous. The solution was allowed to stand in a loosely capped vial in the hood for 3 d, affording X-ray quality crystals of (19a). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C17H24NO4)+ 306.1705, found 306.1720.
tert-Butyl 2-(((4-methoxybenzoyl)oxy)methyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-7-carboxylate (21a) and (21b)
para-Methoxybenzoyl chloride (4.51 g, 26.4 mmol) was added to a solution of alcohols (8) (3.40 g, 13.21 mmol) in dry py (13 mL) at rt under Ar. After 20 h, py was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was diluted with DCM (50 mL) and water (50 mL). The organic layer was recovered and the aq layer was extracted with DCM (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with 0.5 N aq HCl (2 × 50 mL), water (1 × 50 mL) and brine (1 × 50 mL), then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. After filtration of the mixture, all volatiles were evaporated in vacuo and the crude product (20) was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 30% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent to give a total of 3.72 g (72%) of pure diastereomers (21a) and (21b) (1:1 ratio).
(21a)
(1.86 g, 36%, the less retained isomer, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.95 - 7.92 (m, 2H), 6.87 - 6.84 (m, 2H), 4.30 - 4.21 (m, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.43 - 3.33 (m, 3H), 3.18 (t, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (dt, J = 13.4, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.00 - 1.88 (m, 3H), 1.88 - 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 166.2, 163.43, 163.41, 154.6, 154.5, 131.7, 122.44, 122.40, 113.6, 88.8, 88.0, 79.22, 79.18, 76.6, 66.4, 56.2, 55.7, 55.4, 45.1, 44.7, 37.4, 36.8, 33.8, 33.5, 28.5, 28.32, 28.30; IR (neat) 2972, 1712, 1693, 1606, 1403 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (2M + H)+ (C42H59N2O12)+ 783.4068, found 783.4072 (base peak); m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C21H30NO6)+ 92.2073, found 392.2071.
(21b)
(1.86 g, 36%, the more retained isomer, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.95 - 7.93 (m, 2H), 6.87 - 6.84 (m, 2H), 4.31 - 4.21 (m, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.42 - 3.22 (m, 4H), 2.08 - 1.95 (m, 3H), 1.87 - 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.73 (tt, J = 12.3, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 1.38 (s, 4.0 H), 1.37 (s, 5.0 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 166.26, 166.24, 163.4, 154.49, 154.47, 131.72, 131.71, 122.40, 122.38, 113.65, 113.64, 88.8, 88.0, 79.24, 79.18, 76.7, 66.40, 66.38, 56.6, 56.2, 55.4, 45.0, 44.6, 36.8, 36.2, 34.1, 33.9, 28.5, 28.3, 28.2; IR (neat) 2971, 1714, 1694, 1606, 1404 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C21H30NO6)+ 392.2073, found 392.2074.
tert-Butyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-7-carboxylates (11a) and (11b)
A solution of NaOMe in MeOH (0.83 mL, 25 wt%, 3.83 mmol) was added to a solution of p-methoxybenzoate (21a) or (21b) (0.75 g, 1.92 mmol) in anhyd MeOH (10 mL) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 16h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was treated with 5% aq. acetic acid (10 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with DCM (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with satd aq NaHCO3 solution (2 × 10 mL), and brine (1 × 20 mL), then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. After filtration of the mixture, all volatiles were removed and the crude product was purified by column chromatography using 80% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent.
(11a)
(0.47 g, 95%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 4.06 – 4.02 (m, 1H), 3.64 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.46 - 3.33 (m, 4H), 3.16 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 1.94 - 1.76 (m, 6H), 1.39 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.6, 154.5, 88.7, 87.9, 79.30, 79.27, 79.23, 79.0, 65.1, 64.9, 56.2, 55.6, 45.1, 44.7, 37.3, 36.9, 33.9, 33.7, 28.5, 27.31, 27.26; IR (neat) 3432, 2973, 1692, 1673, 1401 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C8H16NO2)+ 158.1181, found 158.1176.
(11b)
(0.46 g, 93%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 4.05 (dddd, J = 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.65 - 3.61 (m, 1H), 3.46 - 3.21 (m, 5H), 1.98 - 1.89 (m, 4H), 1.78 - 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.39 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.6, 154.5, 88.7, 87.9, 79.38, 79.31, 79.26, 79.16, 77.2, 65.1, 65.0, 56.6, 56.2, 45.1, 44.6, 36.7, 36.1, 34.1, 33.9, 28.5, 27.31, 27.26; IR (neat) 2972, 1692, 1673, 1402 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C8H16NO2)+ 158.1181, found 158.1171.
tert-Butyl 2-formyl-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7-carboxylate (12a)
A solution of oxalyl chloride (0.017 mL, 0.19 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) was cooled to −78 °C and a solution of DMSO (0.027 mL, 0.38 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting solution was stirred for 15 min at this temperature. A solution of the alcohol (10a) or (10b) (0.128 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C. Triethylamine (0.089 mL, 0.64 mmol) was then added dropwise and the mixture was allowed to warm slowly to rt over a period of 1 h. After 1h, the reaction was diluted with CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and water (5 mL). The organic phase was removed and the aq layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 2 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (1 × 5 mL), brine (1 × 5 mL), and dried over anhyd Na2SO4. After filtration of the mixture the solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the crude product was purified by column chromatography using 60%–80% EtOAc/hexanes as eluent. ((12a): 0.028 g, 81%; colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 9.60 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (br s, 1H), 3.46 - 3.36 (m, 2H), 3.16 - 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.25 - 2.11 (m, 1H), 2.03 (ddt, J = 13.5, 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.87 - 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.73 (dddd, J = 12.5, 8.5, 6.8, 4.1 Hz, 2H), 1.66 - 1.57 (m, 2H), 1.49 - 1.43 (m, 1H), 1.38 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 202.7, 154.9, 82.8, 82.6, 79.6, 51.9, 51.0, 44.2, 43.2, 36.3, 33.0, 28.4, 27.1, 23.2; IR (neat) 2974, 1733, 1686, 1420 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C14H24NO4)+ 270.1705, found 270.1705.
tert-Butyl 2-formyl-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-7-carboxylate (13a) and (13b)
Following the above procedure for preparation of (12a) and using either (11a) or (11b) as starting material, aldehydes (13a) or (13b) were obtained.
(13a)
0.027 g, 82%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 9.68 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.55 - 3.44 (m, 3H), 3.28 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.29 - 2.20 (m, 1H), 2.15 - 1.99 (m, 3H), 1.95 - 1.86 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 202.3, 202.1, 154.5, 154.4, 90.2, 89.4, 82.8, 82.7, 79.4, 56.0, 55.5, 45.1, 44.6, 36.9, 36.3, 33.3, 32.9, 28.5, 27.62, 27.58; IR (neat) 2974, 1733, 1691, 1403 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (2M + H)+ (C26H43N2O8)+ 511.3019, found 511.3011 (base peak); m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C13H22NO4)+ 256.1549, found 256.1562.
(13b)
(0.030 g, 87% colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 9.69 - 9.67 (m, 1H), 4.41 - 4.33 (m, 1H), 3.51 (ddt, J = 22.7, 8.8, 5.2 Hz, 3H), 3.35 (dd, J = 19.8, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 2.29 - 2.23 (m, 1H), 2.15 - 2.03 (m, 2H), 1.96 (dt, J = 14.5, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.91 - 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.47 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3,125 MHz) δ 202.5, 202.2, 154.4, 90.3, 89.5, 82.9, 82.8, 79.5, 79.4, 56.1, 55.8, 45.1, 44.6, 36.7, 36.1, 33.3, 28.5, 27.9, 27.6; IR (neat) 2974, 1733, 1692, 1403 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C13H22NO4)+ 256.1549, found 256.1561.
tert-Butyl 6-formyl-5-oxa-2-azaspiro[3.4]octane-2-carboxylate (14)
A solution of oxalyl chloride (0.185 mL, 2.14 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5.0 mL) was cooled to −78 °C and a solution of DMSO (0.304 mL, 4.27 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) was added drop wise. The resulting solution was stirred for 15 min at this temperature. A solution of (9) (0.104 g, 0.427 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL) was then added drop wise and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C. Triethylamine (0.894 mL, 6.41 mmol) was added and the mixture was allowed to warm slowly to rt. After 30 min the reaction was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and satd aq NaHCO3 (10 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aq layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), and then dried over anhyd Na2SO4. Filtration of the mixture and evaporation of the solvent, followed by flash chromatography (10–50% EtOAc/Hex), gave the aldehyde (14) (0.06 g, 0.25 mmol, 58%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 9.67 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (ddd, J = 7.9, 6.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (ddd, J = 11.8, 9.2, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (ddd, J = 9.2, 5.6, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 2.28 - 1.99 (m, 4H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 201.3, 156.4, 83.3, 79.84, 79.81, 77.2, 61.3 (broad peak), 35.2, 28.4, 26.8; IR (neat) 2972, 2876, 1730, 1698, 1399 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for negative ion (M − H)− (C12H18NO4)− 240.1236, found 240.1214.
7-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]decane-2-carboxylic acid (15a) and (15b)
NMO•H2O (0.446 g, 3.3 mmol) was added at rt to the solution of alcohol (10a) or (10b) (0.33 mmol) in CH3CN (5 mL). TPAP (11.6 mg, 0.033 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was further stirred at rt for 16 h in a closed vessel. Water (2 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was acidified with satd aq sodium hydrogen sulfate to pH ~3. DCM (10mL) was added and the organic phase was separated. The aq phase was extracted with DCM (3 × 3 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with water (1 × 10 mL), brine (1 × 10 mL) and dried over anhyd Na2SO4. The mixture was filtered and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified using 5%–20% MeOH/DCM as eluent.
(15a)
(0.050 g, 53%, white solid); mp 94.0–96.0 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 9.24 (s, 1H), 4.58 (dd, J = 8.3, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.71 – 3.41 (m, 2H), 3.24 - 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.43 (br s, 1H), 2.23 (br s, 1H), 1.94 (ddd, J = 12.3, 8.1, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 1.89 – 1.74 (m, 3H), 1.66 (dt, J = 12.2, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 1.54 - 1.46 (m, 10H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 176.1, 155.1, 154.7, 83.7, 79.8, 76.4, 51.8, 50.8, 44.2, 43.2, 36.3, 32.7, 32.5, 29.5, 28.4, 23.4, 23.22; IR (neat) 2935, 1749, 1688, 1647, 1423 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C9H16NO3)+ 186.1130, found 186.1126.
(15b)
(0.059 g, 63%, colorless oil); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 4.51 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 2H), 2.94 - 2.71 (m, 2H), 2.41 (dq, J = 13.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (dq, J = 12.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 1.94 - 1.79 (m, 3H), 1.74 (dt, J = 12.8, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 1.63 - 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.50 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 174.5, 157.8, 83.8, 80.9, 77.9, 53.4, 45.7, 35.9, 34.5, 30.5, 28.4, 22.5; IR (neat) 2936, 1751, 1689, 1659, 1423 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C9H16NO3)+ 186.1130, found 186.1136.
7-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-2-carboxylic acid (16a) and (16b)
Using the above procedure for the preparation of acids (15a/15b) with (11a) or (11b) as starting materials the acids (16a) and (16b) were obtained.
(16a)
(0.049 g, 55%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.51 (br s, 1H), 4.57 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.55 - 3.43 (m, 3H), 3.28 (t, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (dq, J = 13.0, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.31 - 2.13 (m, 2H), 2.10 - 1.81 (m, 3H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 176.5, 176.3, 154.7, 154.6, 90.6, 89.9, 79.69, 79.64, 77.2 76.6, 76.4, 56.1, 55.5, 45.1, 44.6, 36.6, 36.1, 33.2, 32.9, 30.3, 30.2, 28.5; IR (neat) 2975, 1738, 1690, 1666, 1640, 1412 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (2M + H)+ (C26H43N2O10)+ 543.2918, found 543.2925 (base peak); m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C13H22NO5)+ 272.1498, found 272.1509.
(16b)
(0.047 g, 53%, colorless oil, mixture of two rotamers); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.26 (br s, 1H), 4.57 (dt, J = 9.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.67 - 3.35 (m, 4H), 2.46 - 2.36 (m, 1H), 2.26 - 2.18 (m, 1H), 2.10 - 2.01 (m, 2H), 1.97 - 1.90 (m, 1H), 1.82 (tt, J = 12.8, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 175.8, 175.3, 154.8, 154.6, 90.8, 89.9, 79.8, 79.7, 76.5, 55.9, 55.5, 45.0, 44.5, 36.8, 36.2, 33.1, 30.2, 28.5; IR (neat) 2974, 1739, 1691, 1667, 1645, 1411 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C13H22NO5)+ 272.1498, found 272.1509.
2-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-5-oxa-2-azaspiro[3.4]octane-6-carboxylic acid (17)
A 25 mL rb flask was charged with NMO•0.21H2O (0.481 g, 4.11 mmol), water (0.037 mL, 2.0 mmol) and alcohol (9) (0.100 g, 0.41 mmol) as a solution in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL). Tetrapropylammonium perruthenate (14.5 mg, 0.041 mmol, 10 mol%) was added to this mixture at rt. The mixture was stirred for 30 min during which time the color changed from green to yellow. The reaction was quenched with 5% aq acetic acid (5 mL). The organic layer was separated and the aq layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhyd Na2SO4. After filtration of the mixture, evaporation of the solvent gave a viscous oil that was purified by flash chromatography to provide (17) (0.055 g, 0.214 mmol, 52%) as white crystalline solid. mp = 123.5–127.3 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 4.50 (dd, J = 8.1, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (ddd, J = 9.3, 4.5, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 2.36 - 2.23 (m, 1H), 2.20 - 2.00 (m, 3H), 1.37 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz, 85 °C) δ 173.80, 156.4, 80.1, 79.3, 77.5, 62.5, 61.8, 35.0, 29.5, 28.6. IR (neat) 2373, 2924, 1740, 1702, 1428 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C12H20NO5)+ 258.1341, found 258.1346.
1-Oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]nonan-2-ylmethyl 4-methoxybenzoate hydrochloride (22a)
TFA (0.31 mL, 4.05 mmol) was added to a solution of (21a) (66 mg, 0.17 mmol) in DCM (2 mL) at rt. The reaction mixture slowly became light yellow and was stirred at rt for 1 h. All volatiles were removed in vacuo. Saturated aq NaHCO3 (4 mL) was added and the solution was stirred at rt for 2 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with DCM (3 × 3 mL). The organic extracts were evaporated to give the free amine which was suspended in deionized water (1 mL) and acidified with 0.1 N aq HCl to pH ~2 (by pH meter). The mixture was stirred further for 30 min until homogenous and then lyophilized over a period of 48 h to give crystals of 22a. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M − HCl + H)+ (C16H22NO4)+ 292.1549, found 292.1532.
tert-Butyl 1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.5]dec-2-ene-7-carboxylate (26)
A solution of (23) (0.559 g, 2.189 mmol) and 4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide (0.510 g, 2.740 mmol) in EtOH (5.47 mL) was heated to reflux for 4.5 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with water and DCM, and the layers separated. The aq layer was extracted with DCM (x3) and the combined organic layers were dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The crude material was chromatographed on silica gel (20 to 40% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the tosylhydrazones (0.925 g, 85%) as a white, amorphous solid that appeared by 1H NMR spectroscopy to be a mixture of the corresponding geometric isomers. This compound was taken to the next step without further characterization.
In a procedure similar to that of Smith,13 to a solution of the tosylhydrazones derived from (23) (1.056 g, 2.493 mmol) in tert-butanol (12.5 mL) was added potassium tert-butoxide (0.582 g, 5.190 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated in a sealed pressure tube at 120 °C for 18 h (CAUTION: evolved nitrogen was vented periodically during the first 4–6 h. Ample head space in the tube was also provided). The reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with water and isopropyl acetate and the layers separated. The aq layer was extracted with isopropyl acetate (x3). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The crude material was chromatographed on silica gel (0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes) to give (26) (0.597 g, 63%) as a white solid. mp = 84.0 – 86.5 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHZ, 90 °C) δ 6.29 (bs, 1H), 4.85 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 12.8, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (m, 2H), 2.38 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 1.81 - 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.74 - 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.48 - 1.47 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz, 90 °C) δ 153.6, 143.6, 97.3, 82.6, 77.9, 50.5, 42.4, 37.2, 34.3, 27.4, 21.2; IR 2935, 1693 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C8H14NO)+ 140.1075, found 140.1067.
tert-Butyl 1-oxa-7-azaspiro[4.4]non-2-ene-7-carboxylate (27)
Following the above procedure for preparation of (26), using (24) as starting material (1.611 g, 6.680 mmol) and 4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide (1.865 g, 10.02 mmol) as reagent, the mixture of tosylhydrazones (2.240 g, 82%) was obtained as a white, amorphous solid that was used without further characterization.
Following the above procedure a solution of the tosylhydrazones derived from (24) (0.726 g, 1.772 mmol) in tert-butanol (10 mL) were reacted with potassium tert-butoxide (0.414 g, 3.690 mmol) to afford the product (27) (0.206 g, 52%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHZ) δ 6.19 (s, 1H), 4.83 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.73 - 3.36 (m, 3H), 3.23 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.65 - 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.54 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.16 - 2.12 (m, 1H), 1.85 - 1.79 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) ~1:1 mixture of rotamers; δ 154.3, 144.1, 98.8, 98.7, 90.8, 90.1, 79.2, 79.1, 57.4, 56.9, 45.1, 44.6, 37.8, 37.2, 36.7, 36.5, 28.4; IR (neat) 2976, 1692 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C12H20NO3)+ 226.1443, found 226.1459.
tert-Butyl 5-oxa-2-azaspiro[3.4]oct-6-ene-2-carboxylate (28)
Following the above procedure for preparation of (26) with (25) as starting material (0.562 g, 2.473 mmol) and 4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide (0.691 g, 3.710 mmol) as reagent, the derived tosylhydrazones (0.678 g, 69%) were obtained as a white, amorphous solid.
Following the above procedure, a solution of the tosylhydrazones derived from (25) (0.602 g, 1.523 mmol) in tert-butanol (10 mL) were reacted with potassium tert-butoxide (0.355 g, 3.170 mmol) to afford the product (28) (0.140 g, 44%) as a white solid. mp = 58.1 – 60.4 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 6.24 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (dd, J = 2.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (dd, J = 2.4, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 156.2, 144.5, 99.1, 80.0, 79.6, 63.7, 39.8, 28.3; IR (neat) 2977, 1700 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C11H18NO3)+ 212.1287, found 212.1292.

tert-Butyl 2-deutero-1-oxa-8-azaspiro[4.5]dec-2-ene-8-carboxylate (35)
A −78 °C solution of (26) (0.102 g, 0.428 mmol) in dry THF (3 mL) was treated with t-butyllithium (0.660 mL of a 1.42 M solution in pentane, 0.941 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min then warmed to −45 °C and stirred for an additional 2 h. The reaction mixture was cooled back to −78 °C and anhyd methanol-d4 (1 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred for 10 min then warmed to rt. The reaction mixture was diluted with toluene and concentrated under vacuum. Toluene was again added giving a white suspension that was filtered and concentrated under vacuum to give compound (35) (0.092 mg, 90%) as a white solid. 1H NMR indicated complete conversion to the deuterated species as evidenced by the absence of the enol ether α proton signal at δ 6.24. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHZ) δ 4.83 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.43 - 3.29 (m, 4H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 2.31 (dd, J = 15.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 1.92 - 1.65 (m, 3H), 1.55 - 1.40 (m, 10H); HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C13H21DNO3)+ 241.1662, found 241.1680.
tert-Butyl 2-formyl-1-oxa-8-azaspiro[4.5]dec-2-ene-8-carboxylate (29)
To a −78 °C solution of (26) (0.094 g, 0.391 mmol) in THF (2.60 mL) was added t-butyllithium (0.560 mL of a 1.55 M solution in pentane, 0.860 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min then warmed to −45 °C and stirred for an additional 2 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled back to −78 °C and N-formylpiperdine (1 mL) was added dropwise over 3–4 min. The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min then warmed to −45 °C and stirred for 18 h. The mixture was slowly warmed to 0 °C in 15 °C increments over 2 h and then stirred at 0 °C for an additional 1 h. The reaction was then quenched with satd aq NaHCO3. The mixture was diluted with water and MTBE and the layers separated. The aq layer was extracted with MTBE (x3) and the combined organic layers were washed with water (x2) and brine (x1). The organic layer was dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The crude material was chromatographed on silica gel (0 to 20% EtOAc in hexanes) to give the product (29) (0.053 g, 51%) as a viscous brown oil and recovered starting material (0.005 g, 5%) as a white solid. Reaction of (26) (0.102 mg), t-butyllithium (0.620 mL of a 1.51 M solution in pentane, 0.934 mmol) and DMF (1 mL) in the same fashion also afforded the product (29) (0.041 mg, 36%) with no recovered starting material. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHZ, −45 °C), ~1:1 mixture of rotamers; δ 9.39 (s, 0.56 H), 9.36 (s, 0.44H), 6.09 (s, 0.56H), 6.06 (s, 0.44H), 3.95 - 3.56 (m, 2H), 3.10 - 2.79 (m, 2H), 2.79 - 2.51 (m, 2H), 1.85 - 1.74 (m, 3H), 1.45 - 1.38 (m, 1H), 1.37 (br s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, −45 °C) ~1:1 mixture of rotamers; δ 182.4, 154.9, 154.6, 154.5, 154.4, 121.7, 121.2, 85.6, 79.9, 50.8, 49.7, 43.2, 42.1, 38.8, 38.6, 35.1, 34.9, 28.0, 22.2, 21.9; IR (neat) 2976, 1686 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H)+ (C14H22NO4)+ 268.1549, found 268.1571.
di-tert-Butyl 5-oxa-2-azaspiro[3.4]oct-6-ene-2,6-dicarboxylate (34)
Following the above procedure for preparation of (29), compound (31) (0.103 g, 0.488 mmol) was reacted with t-butyllithium (0.886 mL of a 1.21 M solution in pentane, 1.073 mmol) and N-formylpiperdine (1 mL, excess). The by-product (34) (0.003 mg, 2%) was isolated as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 5.84 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (dd, J = 9.6, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H), 2.97 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.25 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 198.0, 156.2, 153.9, 109.4, 81.4, 80.0, 43.5, 40.2, 29.7, 28.3, 25.9; IR (neat) 2928, 1707, 1608 cm−1. No molecular ion was observed.
tert-Butyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxa-8-azaspiro[4.5]dec-2-ene-8-carboxylate (32)
To a solution of (29) (0.030 g, 0.111 mmol) in absolute ethanol (1.11 mL) was added sodium borohydride (0.005 g, 0.133 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min then diluted with toluene, filtered through a pad of celite and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was redissolved in a 1:1 solution of DCM:EtOAc and filtered through a 1 g silica gel SPE that had been pretreated with a solution of 2% triethylamine in hexanes. Further elution was done with EtOAc, affording the pure product (32) (0.019 g, 65%) as a viscous brown oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHZ) δ 4.82 (br s, 1H), 4.08 (br s, 2H), 3.93 - 3.06 (br m, 4H), 2.79 - 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.39 - 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.05 - 1.73 (br m, 2H), 1.72 - 1.70 (m, 1H), 1.58 - 1.50 (m, 1H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, −45 °C) ~2:1 mixture of rotamers; Rotamer 1: δ 156.6, 154.5, 97.8, 84.8, 80.0, 57.6, 50.2, 44.6, 38.1, 34.0, 28.1, 22.1; Rotamer 2: δ 154.8, 154.3, 95.7; 84.0, 79.8, 58.1, 51.3, 42.4, 38.2, 35.1, 28.2, 22.0; IR: 3426, 2933, 1676 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C9H16NO2)+ 170.1181, found 170.1203.
8-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-1-oxa-8-azaspiro[4.5]dec-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid (33)
In a manner similar to Snider,16 to a solution of (29) (0.027 mg, 0.099 mmol) and 2-methyl-2-butene (0.238 mL or a 2M solution in THF, 0.476 mmol) in tert-butanol (0.90 mL) at 0 °C was added a solution of sodium chlorite (0.012 mg of an 80 wt% solid, 0.109 mmol) and monobasic sodium phosphite hydrate (0.015 g, 0.109 mmol) in water (0.10 mL). The reaction mixture was warmed to rt and stirred for 90 min. The mixture was diluted with water and acidified to pH ~3.00 with 0.1 M aq HCl as determined by pH meter. The mixture was extracted into EtOAc (x3) and the combined organic layers were dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum. The crude material was chromatographed on silica gel (1% AcOH, 30% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford (33) (0.013 g, 45%) as an amorphous white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHZ, 50 °C) δ 5.95 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.51 - 3.43 (m, 2H), 3.41 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 3.32 - 3.28 (m, 1H), 2.65 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.06 - 1.78 (m, 4H), 1.60 - 1.42 (m, 10H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, 50 °C) δ 162.4, 155.4, 146.7, 111.2, 85.9, 80.2, 51.4, 43.7, 39.3, 35.5, 28.5, 22.4; IR (neat) 3480, 2950, 1693, 1633 cm−1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for (M + H−Boc)+ (C9H14NO3)+ 184.0974, found 184.0961.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Frank Schoenen, Associate Director of the University of Kansas Specialized Chemistry Center, for kindly reviewing this manuscript. We acknowledge Mr. Patrick Porubsky, KU-CMLD Purification Chemist and Compound Curator as well as Dr. Victor W. Day of the KU Molecular Structures Group, X-ray crystallography. Financial support for the KU-CMLD was provided under NIGMS Grant #5P50GM069663. Support for the KU-NMR Center (JTD) was provided under Grant #NIH 1S10RR024664-01. Support for the KU-X-Ray facility (VWD) was provided under NSF-MRI Grant CHE-0923449.
Footnotes
Supporting Information. Complete discussion of stereochemistry of 10a and 10b by 3D NMR spectroscopy, X-ray structures of compounds 19a and 22a, 1H and 13C NMR spectral data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.For selected examples of spirocycle synthesis, see: Castaldi MP, Troast DM, Porco JA. Org Lett. 2009;11(15):3362–3365. doi: 10.1021/ol901201k.Badillo JJ, Arevalo GE, Fettinger JC, Franz AK. Org Lett. 2011;13(3):418–421. doi: 10.1021/ol1027305.Dohi T, Nakae T, Ishikado Y, Kato D, Kita Y. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9(20):6899–6902. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06199b.Kang FA, Sui Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52(32):4204–4206.Li DB, Rogers-Evans M, Carreira EM. Org Lett. 2011;13(22):6134–6136. doi: 10.1021/ol2025313.Burkhard JA, Guerot C, Knust H, Carreira EM. Org Lett. 2012;14(1):66–69. doi: 10.1021/ol2028459.Liu TL, He ZL, Tao HY, Wang CJ. Chem Eur J. 2012;18(26):8042–8046. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103876.
- 2.For reviews on spirocycle syntheses, see: Kotha S, Deb AC, Lahiri K, Manivannan E. Synthesis. 2009;(2):165–193.Rios R. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(3):1060–1074. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15156h.
- 3.a Lovering F, Bikker J, Humblet C. J Med Chem. 2009;52(21):6752–6756. doi: 10.1021/jm901241e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Burke MD, Schreiber SL. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:46–58. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Meijere A, Winsel H, Stecker B. Org Synth. 2005;81:14–25. [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Imamoto T, Kusumoto T, Tawarayama Y, Sugiura Y, Mita T, Hatanaka Y, Yokoyama M. J Org Chem. 1984;49(21):3904–3912. [Google Scholar]; (b) Imamoto T, Takiyama N, Nakamura K, Hatajima T, Kamiya Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111(12):4392–4398. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baldwin JE. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1976:734–736. [Google Scholar]
- 7.For selected examples of mCPBA mediated cyclizations of 5-hydroxy-1-pentenes, see: Bartlett PA, Chapuis C. J Org Chem. 1986;51(14):2799–806.Maertens F, Toppet S, Compernolle F, Hoornaert GJ. Eur J Org Chem. 2004;(12):2707–2714.Perez-Hernandez N, Febles M, Perez C, Perez R, Rodriguez ML, Foces-Foces C, Martin JD. J Org Chem. 2006;71(3):1139–1151. doi: 10.1021/jo052237p.Shoji M, Akiyama N, Tsubone K, Lash LL, Sanders JM, Swanson GT, Sakai R, Shimamoto K, Oikawa M, Sasaki M. J Org Chem. 2006;71(14):5208–5220. doi: 10.1021/jo0605593.Willot M, Radtke L, Koenning D, Froehlich R, Gessner VH, Strohmann C, Christmann M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48(48):9105–9108. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905032.Guo L, Ye Z, Liu J, He S, Bakshi RK, Sebhat IK, Dobbelaar PH, Hong Q, Jian T, Dellureficio JP, Tsou NN, Ball RG, Weinberg DH, MacNeil T, Tang R, Tamvakopoulos C, Peng Q, Chen HY, Chen AS, Martin WJ, MacIntyre DE, Strack AM, Fong TM, Wyvratt MJ, Nargund RP. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20(16):4895–4900. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.068.Peng F, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52(17):2104–2106. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.11.029.
- 8.Schmidt AKC, Stark CBW. Org Lett. 2011;13(16):4164–4167. doi: 10.1021/ol2014335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Ashby EC, Bowers J, Depriest R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980;21(37):3541–3542. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ashby EC, Goel AB. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103(16):4983–4985. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang Y, Wenderoth B, Su WY, Ashby EC. J Organomet Chem. 1985;292(1–2):29–37. [Google Scholar]
- 10.An online search for compounds 16a and 16b returns a commercial supplier and a CAS number but no reported preparation or defined stereochemistry.
- 11.An online search for compound 17 returns a commercial supplier and a CAS number but no reported preparation.
- 12.Painter TO, Bunn JR, Schoenen FJ, Douglas JT, Day VW, Santini C. J Org Chem. 2013;78:3720–3730. doi: 10.1021/jo400077m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith AB, III, Sulikowski GA, Sulikowski MM, Fujimoto K. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(7):2567–2576. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paquette LA, Schulze MM, Bolin DG. J Org Chem. 1994;59:2043–2051. [Google Scholar]
- 15.For selected examples of syntheses using α-lithiated enol ethers see: Hedtmann U, Welzel P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26(23):2773–2774.Yeates C, Street SDA, Kocienski P, Campbell SF. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1985;(20):1388–1389.Braish TF, Saddler JC, Fuchs PL. J Org Chem. 1988;53(16):3647–3658.Smith AB, III, Empfield JR, Vaccaro HA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989;30(52):7325–7328.Le MP, Fargeas V, Poisson J, Ardisson J, Lallemand JY, Pancrazi A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35(42):7767–70.Parker KA, Mindt TL, Koh Y-h. Org Lett. 2006;8(9):1759–1762. doi: 10.1021/ol060206q.
- 16.Gao X, Matsuo Y, Snider BB. Org Lett. 2006;8(10):2123–2126. doi: 10.1021/ol0605777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




