Abstract
Many common neoplasms are still noncurative with current standards of cancer therapy. More therapeutic modalities need to be developed to significantly prolong the lives of patients and eventually cure a wider spectrum of cancers. Oncolytic virotherapy is one of the promising new additions to clinical cancer therapeutics. Successful oncolytic virotherapy in the clinic will be those strategies that best combine tumor cell oncolysis with enhanced immune responses against tumor antigens. The current candidate oncolytic viruses all share the common property that they are relatively nonpathogenic to humans, yet they have the ability to replicate selectively in human cancer cells and induce cancer regression by direct oncolysis and/or induction of improved anti-tumor immune responses. Many candidate oncolytic viruses are in various stages of clinical and preclinical development. One such preclinical candidate is myxoma virus (MYXV), a member of the Poxviridae family that, in its natural setting, exhibits a very restricted host range and is only pathogenic to European rabbits. Despite its narrow host range in nature, MYXV has been shown to productively infect various classes of human cancer cells. Several preclinical in vivo modeling studies have demonstrated that MYXV is an attractive and safe candidate oncolytic virus, and hence, MYXV is currently being developed as a potential therapeutic for several cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, ovarian cancer, melanoma, and hematologic malignancies. This review highlights the preclinical cancer models that have shown the most promise for translation of MYXV into human clinical trials.
Keywords: Myxoma Virus, Oncolytic Virotherapy, Hematological Malignancies, Pancreatic Cancer
Introduction
Cancer remains a major public health problem worldwide. For example, one out of four deaths in the United States is due to cancer [1]. Current standards of cancer therapy include resection surgery (if applicable), radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or biological therapy. However, available treatments for many common cancers remain noncurative and in many cases prolong survival rates only in the short term. Therefore, development of more efficacious treatments is much needed in order to significantly prolong the lives of cancer patients and eventually cure a wider spectrum of cancers. One of the newer and promising cancer therapeutic strategies is oncolytic virotherapy, and the first candidate viruses are rapidly approaching licensure in North America and Europe [2]. Successful oncolytic virotherapy in the clinic will possess two closely inter-related properties: the ability to destroy cancer cells directly but also the capacity to enhance acquired immune responses against tumor antigens, i.e., oncolytic virotherapy and anti-tumor immunostimulation are inextricably linked to each other. In general terms, a replication-competent virus, which spares normal tissues but selectively replicates in cancer cells, is used to specifically infect and eliminate cancerous tissues [3]. Viruses with demonstrated oncolytic potential include numerous candidates that are relatively nonpathogenic to humans but have a biologic proclivity to replicate selectively in human cancer cells. Examples of viruses that are in various stages of clinical and preclinical development include measles virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, adenovirus, reovirus, herpes simplex virus and two poxviruses, vaccinia virus and myxoma virus (MYXV) (Reviewed in [4-9]). Vaccinia virus, a prototypic member of the Poxviridae family, has been widely developed as a vaccination platform, and more recently is being tested as an oncolytic virotherapeutic in Phase II clinical trials for various late stage cancers, including liver cancer and malignancies that metastasize to the liver [4, 10-14]. Vaccinia virus, long used in the worldwide vaccination program against smallpox, is of unknown origin in terms of its evolutionary host, but has been tested extensively in humans.
In general, poxviruses infect a wide range of hosts including humans, monkeys, mice, rabbits and insects, but individual members can be highly species-specific in terms of the hosts that they can infect [15, 16]. For example, vaccinia virus infects a wide variety of vertebrate hosts whereas MYXV is completely restricted to lagomorphs and is only pathogenic in the European rabbit [17-19]. MYXV is the prototypic member of the Leporipoxvirus genus within the Poxviridae family [20-22]. The MYXV Lausanne strain genome is 161.8 kbp in size, encoding about 171 genes [23]. The central region of the genome encodes less than 100 genes that are highly conserved in all poxviruses while the terminal genomic regions are enriched for more unique genes that encode immunomodulatory and host-interactive factors that are involved in subverting the host immune system and other anti-viral responses [20, 24-26]. A more detailed background on MYXV and its history has been described in recent reviews [21, 27].
MYXV causes a lethal disease called myxomatosis in European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) but the virus actually co-evolved within lagomorphs of the Sylvilagus genus, such as the Brazilian tapeti [21, 28]. In the tapeti, MYXV replicates robustly and transmits efficiently from host-to-host but causes no overt disease [28]. The basis for the extreme virulence of MYXV in the European rabbit, and absence of pathogenesis in the tapeti, is not well understood but the virus is essentially nonpathogenic for any host outside the lagomorph family [17-19, 21]. Indeed, the virus fails to replicate to any appreciable extent in any non-rabbit host tested to date, including highly immunodeficient mice [21, 29]. MYXV can successfully replicate in rabbits due to the ability of MYXV to escape multiple diverse host innate and adaptive immune responses [20, 22, 25, 26]. Despite its narrow host range in nature, MYXV has been shown to productively infect various classes of human cancer cells due to several factors, including: I) the failure of most cancer cells to induce appropriate anti-viral responses, such as the synergistic interferon and tumor necrosis factor pathways that efficiently aborts MYXV replication in normal primary human cells [30, 31] and II) the constitutive activation of intracellular pathways related to cellular transformation, such as the phosphorylation of Akt, commonly found in many human cancer cells [32]. A detailed study has shown that MYXV-encoded ankyrin-repeat host range factor, M-T5, interacts with Akt and this interaction is required for the enhanced phosphorylation of Akt [32, 33]. Pharmacologic manipulation of Akt activation affects MYXV tropism, indicating a direct correlation between endogenous activated signal transduction pathways and the permissiveness of MYXV to target human cancer cells [34]. Additionally, our laboratory has demonstrated an important role for the IFN signaling in the permissiveness of MYXV to certain specific cell types [35]. Co-treatment of primary human fibroblasts with type I IFN and TNF induces a synergystic antiviral state that aborts MYXV infection [31]. Importantly, a wide spectrum of human cancer cells has been shown to unable to induce the synergistic antiviral state, which may allow for selective/productive MYXV infection in a wide variety of human cancer cells [30].
Attractive features of MYXV as an oncolytic agent include its ability to productively infect various human cancer cells and its consistent safety in all non-rabbit hosts tested, including mice and humans [17-19, 21, 36]. The work from our laboratory and of others clearly demonstrates that MYXV is an attractive candidate oncolytic virus (Reviewed in [22, 37, 38]), and hence, MYXV is currently being developed as a candidate therapeutic for several cancers, including ovarian cancer, glioblastoma, myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma (MM), melanoma, and pancreatic cancer. This review updates the current status in the oncolytic potential of MYXV for the treatment of these cancers in preclinical animal models (Table 1) and highlights the projected path towards human clinical trials with this virus.
Table 1.
Type of Cancer | Animal Model | Tumor establishment | MYXV Administration | Outcome (References) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | NSG | Human AML cells in bone marrow xenograft | ex vivo * | 90% of mice free of human AML cells in BM [40] |
Multiple Myeloma (MM) | NSG | Human MM cells in bone marrow xenograft | ex vivo * | 100% of mice free of human MM cells in BM [44] |
Pancreatic Cancer | NOD/SCID C57BL/6 |
Human pancreatic cancer cells in intraperiotoneal cavity Murine pancreatic cancer cells in intraperiotoneal cavity |
Intraperitoneal Intraperitoneal |
Reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival [51] 100% survival when combined with gemcitabine [51] |
Glioma | CD-1 nude Fischer 344 rats |
Human gliomas in mouse brain Racine gliomas in rat brain |
Intratumoral Intratumoral |
92% of mice cleared of tumors and cured [66] Prolonged survival when combined with Rapamycin [29] |
Rhabdoid tumors | CD-1 nude | Human rhabdoid tumor cells in mouse brain Human rhabdoid tumor cells in hind flank of mice |
Intratumoral Intratumoral |
Reduced tumor mass; 66.7% of mice had long-term survival [71] Reduced tumor mass [71] |
Medulloblastoma | CD-1 nude | Human medulloblastoma in mouse brain | Intratumoral | Prolonged survival; 60% of mice had long-term survival when combined with rapamycin [72] |
Melanoma | C57BL/6 C57BL/6 |
Subcutaneous murine melanoma Murine melanoma |
Intratumoral Intravenous ex vivo* |
Reduced tumor mass [81] Decreased development of lung metastasis [81] Prevented tumor implantation [81] |
ex vivo treatment of samples with MYXV prior to implantation/engraftment
Hematological malignancies: Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma
Hematological malignancies under consideration here include acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), and lymphomas that mainly affect adults. Approximately 10% of Americans diagnosed with cancer each year will have one of these blood cancers (National Cancer Institute, Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results). For high-risk patients with AML, either autologous or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been used to rescue immune function following myeloablative therapy with high dosages of chemotherapeutics. Autologous stem cell transplants are safer than allogeneic transplants but suffer the downside of being potentially contaminated with residual cancer cells from the donor that can potentially re-seed the cancer following engraftment. Various purging strategies have been attempted in the past to selectively kill off cancer cells in contaminated autologous transplant samples ex vivo, while preserving the normal CD34+ stem cell needed for immune reconstitution (Reviewed in [37, 39]). However, current purging methods do not selectively remove all cancer cells or enrich CD34+ stem cells that would yield transplant samples completely free of contaminating cancer cells, which can still initiate relapse. One suitable purging strategy exploits an oncolytic virus, provided that the candidate virus excels in both properties, namely the ability to recognize and kill cancer cells even at low levels of contamination, and the inability to infect or perturb normal CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells.
Kim et al. reported that MYXV efficiently infects and kills primary leukemic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from patients with acute myeloid leukemia without altering the ability of the normal human CD34+ HSPCs to differentiate into the expected leukocyte lineages in vitro [40]. Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells or selected CD34+ cells derived from normal human donors, following treatment with MYXV ex vivo, still efficiently engrafted into the bone marrow of highly immunodeficient NOD/scid/IL2 receptor gamma chain knock out (NSG) mice, indicating that MYXV pretreatment ex vivo did not perturb the engraftment/differentiation potential of normal donor human HSPCs. It was recently reported that the completion of the viral replication cycle is not necessary for the prevention of leukemic cell engraftment [41]. It was speculated that binding of virus to the surface of leukemic cells could provoke an early anti-viral response that prevents the engraftment, but other potential explanations are still formally possible.
MM is a malignancy of plasmacytoid cells and is most prevalent in adults. One standard treatment for MM patients is a high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While this treatment significantly prolonged survival compared to patients treated with chemotherapy alone, it does not cure the disease and generally leads to relapse [42, 43]. Bartee et al. observed that MYXV infected and killed all human MM cell lines tested efficiently in culture by inducing rapid cellular apoptosis [44]. Treatment of human MM cell lines with MYXV prior to xenotransplantation into NSG mice prevented engraftment of the input MM cells [44].
The studies summarized above clearly show that MYXV has the ability to discriminate cancerous myeloid cells from the normal CD34+ HSPCs found within complex bone marrow transplant samples, and is thus an attractive candidate to be exploited as an ex vivo purging agent for AML and MM from autologous stem cell transplant specimens. However, the reason MYXV selectively binds and infects so many types of human cancer cells while the virus fails to bind to normal CD34+ HSPCs has not yet been molecularly defined. It is important to next characterize the mechanism by which MYXV selectively purges various classes of cancer cells from autologous bone marrow transplant samples because it will provide a more mechanistic basis for understanding why primary human CD34+ HSPCs cannot bind MYXV, and thus are not infected by this virus.
Pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic cancer was reported to be the fourth leading cause of cancer related deaths in the US [1]. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer, although many patients are not candidates for resection because of the late stage of disease diagnosis. Current treatment of pancreatic cancer is resection of tumors, if resectable, followed by radiation and/or chemotherapy with gemcitabine (a nucleoside analog) [45-47]. Unfortunately, current treatments are not sufficiently effective and 5 year survival statistics remain grim. Therefore, it would be beneficial to have new therapies to combine with current therapeutics for an efficient treatment to prolong survival [48].
It is known that activated Akt, an inhibitor of apoptosis, is upregulated in many pancreatic cancer cells and acquired resistance to gemcitabine is associated with increased levels of activated Akt [49]. Given a direct correlation between activated Akt and the permissiveness of cancer cells to MYXV, the abnormal signaling repertoire of pancreatic cancer cells led to the idea of testing the oncolysis of MYXV against human pancreatic cancer cells [32]. Permissiveness of various pancreatic cancer cells to MYXV infection was directly related to the level of endogenous phosphorylated Akt, suggesting that MYXV may represent a potential alternative therapeutics for pancreatic cancer, especially those that are gemcitabine-resistant [49, 50].
Detailed studies by Wennier et al. revealed that all five pancreatic cancer cell lines tested were permissive to MYXV in vitro [51]. Replication of MYXV within transplanted tumors was also observed when MYXV was intratumorally injected into subcutaneous human or murine cancer cells implanted into immunodeficient or immunocompetent mice, respectively [51]. In an intraperitoneal dissemination (IPD) model of late stage metastatic carcinamatosis, MYXV was found to reduce tumor burden and prolong survival. Therefore, this study demonstrates that MYXV is an effective oncolytic agent in the disseminated pancreatic cancer model. Combined MYXV and gemcitabine therapy enhanced survival more than either treatment alone In this immunocompromised IPD model [51]. Even more dramatically, in the immunocompetent IPD model, sequential treatment with MYXV followed by gemcitabine resulted in 100% survival of all tumor-bearing mice, indicating that MYXV infection of pancreatic cancer cells in situ made the tumors more sensitive to gemcitabine therapy. However, an intact immune response appeared to be required for the enhanced survival following the sequential virus-gemcitabine treatment regimen [51].
More work is needed in order to determine the molecular mechanism underlying the clearance of disseminated pancreatic cancer by the MYXV-gemcitabine strategy, and the apparently immunostimulatory mechanisms responsible for the enhanced survival in immunocompetent models. But potential explanations include the improved antigen presentation of tumor epitopes in tumor beds bearing replicating MYXV and/or selective depletion of immune suppressor cells, such as regulatory T cells that dampen the immune responses against pancreatic cancer cells. Indeed, the future for oncolytic virotherapy of pancreatic cancer in general will likely hinge upon the successful integration of viral oncolysis with the subsequent enhancement of anti-tumor immune responses.
Ovarian cancer
Ovarian cancer is the fifth most prevalent cancer in women [1]. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) constitutes approximately 90% of diagnosed ovarian tumors [52]. Lack of clinical symptoms makes early detection problematic and late diagnosis is a major contributor of the poor survival of most ovarian cancer patients. Current standard treatment includes surgery, followed by chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can be initially effective at inducing regression, but most patients subsequently develop chemo-resistant disease. Therefore, the development of new therapeutics is necessary and to date, various virotherapeutics have been applied to EOC [53-59].
MYXV has been shown to productively infect a variety of human EOC cell lines [60]. Additionally, MYXV can infect primary human EOC cells, isolated directly from patient ascites, cultured as suspension EOC or spheroids that mimic EOC dissemination in ascites fluid. Spheroids are multicellular spheres that resemble those observed in patients and are often found in a semi-dormant state with reduced proliferation, and hence, are relatively chemotherapy-resistant. Infected spheroids had reduced ability to adhere and disperse upon attachment, indicating MYXV has a potential to interfere with EOC secondary metastasis [60]. Importantly, primary patient ascites samples were shown to be susceptible to MYXV infection [60]. This is the first report to show that MYXV is oncolytic to primary EOC cells and to suggest that MYXV can effectively target ovarian cancer stem cells and spheroids residing in the ascites fluids. It will be important to next test MYXV against primary EOC in appropriate animal models that best mimic the human disease.
Brain cancer: Glioma, rhabdoid, and medulloblastoma cancers
Malignant gliomas are highly invasive and rapidly growing brain tumors [61]. Current treatment of malignant glioma patients includes surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy [62]. But the standard of care treatment is not effective and most patients survive for only one year on average [62]. To date, a variety of oncolytic viruses have been tested as therapeutics for glioma, and several clinical trials are ongoing to test efficacy in patients [2, 63-65]. The oncolytic potential of MYXV for malignant gliomas has been evaluated more extensively in preclinical models than any other types of cancers described in this review.
Six established malignant human glioma cell lines and two racine cell lines were shown to be permissive to MYXV infection and killed, albiet with different efficiencies [66]. . A single intratumoral administration of MYXV led to a long-term survival and cure of disease in an orthotopic mice model in which human glioma xenografts were implanted into the putamen [66]. Importantly, MYXV was shown to efficiently infect and kill primary human gliomas obtained from surgical specimens cultured ex vivo [66]. Therefore, these data demonstrate that MYXV is a potentially effective virotherapeutic for human gliomas, at least in xenograft mice models.
However, MYXV could only eliminate the tumor mass in the hemisphere in which MYXV was administered [66]. It did not kill distant tumors implanted in the contralateral hemisphere, indicating that MYXV did not appear to efficiently spread to the contralateral hemisphere. Josiah et al. investigated if adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) are suitable therapeutic vehicles to deliver MYXV to brain tumors since ADSC were susceptible to MYXV and supported productive multi-cycle MYXV infection in vitro [67]. Progeny MYXV produced from ADSC cross-infected glioma cells and caused oncolysis of glioma cells, leading to the survival of all mice injected with glioma cells with MYXV-infected ADSC in an orthotopic malignant brain tumor model [67]. Furthermore, multiple injections of MYXV-infected ADSC resulted in long-term survival of mice bearing established orthotopic human malignant gliomas. This is the only report to show that cellular carriers are suitable to be used as therapeutic delivery vehicles for MYXV to cancer tissues.
While MYXV was very effective in eliminating malignant gliomas in the immunocompromised xeno-implanted mice model, MYXV monotherapy did not have a significant effect on the survival of immunocompetent rats bearing racine gliomas [29]. However, survival was markedly prolonged when MYXV was administered in combination with rapamycin. The enhanced effect of rapamycin was due to reduced type I IFN responses and the infiltration of natural killer cells and macrophages into MYXV-treated gliomas [29]. This suggests that host innate immune response barrier(s) might be a major challenge for the effectiveness of virotherapeutic for malignant gliomas, at least in terms of direct oncolytic killing. Whether MYXV replication within a glioma tumor bed might also potentiate anti-glioma immune responses is currently unknown, but would clearly be highly desirable.
Rhabdoid tumors are rare aggressive neoplasms that occur in infants and children under 2 years old. They have been described as kidney tumors but they can develop in various tissues, including the liver, lung, and brain [68-70]. Current available treatments are unsatisfactory for rhabdoid tumors. Wu et al. found that MYXV productively infected and killed four human rhabdoid tumor cell lines in vitro [71]. Intratumoral administration of MYXV to human rhabdoid tumors xeno-implanted either in the hind flank or in the brain of CD-1 nude mice reduced the tumor mass [71]. MYXV treatment dramatically prolonged the survival of mice bearing human rhabdoid tumors in the brain, indicating that MYXV can efficiently eliminate rhabdoid brain tumors [71]. However, the efficacy of MYXV for malignant rhabdoid tumors in immunocompetent models remains to be determined.
Unlike rhabdoid tumors, medulloblastoma is the most commom malignant brain tumor in children but it is very difficult to treat due to its invasive nature. Lun et al. observed that nine of the ten medulloblastoma cell lines tested were permissive to MYXV and MYXV oncolysis was enhanced by treating cells with rapamycin prior to infection. This enhancement was correlated with increased levels of endogenous activated Akt [72]. Intratumoral injection of MYXV prolonged the survival of mice bearing human medullablastoma. Consistent with in vitro observations, administration of rapamycin in conjunction with MYXV enhanced MYXV oncolysis [72]. These data indicate that MYXV will be an effective virotherapeutic agent for the treatment of human medulloblastoma and that combined MYXV and rapamycin therapies will improve the oncolytic potential of MYXV. Again, the efficiency of MYXV for malignant medulloblastoma in immunocompetent models, where host immune response may affect the oncolysis of MYXV, has not been tested yet. More work is needed to determine the mechanisms by which MYXV kills human medulloblastoma and the mechanisms as to how rapamycin enhances oncolysis of MYXV.
Melanoma
Melanoma is a particularly dangerous type of skin cancer and is the leading cause of death from skin disease [1]. Malignant cutaneous melanoma can further develop into metastatic melanoma brain tumors. Patients with metastasized melanoma currently have very poor prognoses [73]. One current promising method of treating metastatic melanoma is adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells [74]. While the treatment is still at the investigational stage, recurrence occurs due to various mechanisms: for example, the escape of antigen-loss variant tumor cells from the killing of antigen-specific T cells [75-79]. Combination therapies with other various treatment modalities might be more efficacious at preventing tumor recurrence. For example, the oncolytic potential of vesicular stomatitis virus has been tested in treating melanoma [80].
Stanford et al. tested the permissiveness of murine melanoma cell lines to MYXV infection in vitro and found a correlation between the permissiveness and the level of endogenous phosphorylated Akt [81]. It was shown that pre-treatment of B16F10 melanoma cells with MYXV prevented the cells from developing primary tumors and lung metastasis in a syngeneic immunocompetent mouse model. In mice bearing established primary subcutaneous tumors, intratumoral injection of MYXV decreased the tumor size. Additionally, systemic intravenous administration of MYXV in series inhibited the development of lung metastasis [81]. Rapamycin, an immunosuppressant that also inhibits growth of tumors and prevents angiogenesis, enhanced the effectiveness of MYXV in the B16F10 lung metastasis mouse model by attenuating the neutralizing antibodies against MYXV from prior administrations [81]. These data demonstrate that MYXV is a promising virotherapeutic for melanoma-derived lung metastasis in immunocompetent animal tumor models, with improved efficacy when combined with rapamycin treatment.
As stated above, adoptive transfer of activated antigen-specific T cells alone was not sufficient to cure disease because tumors recur from the antigen-loss variant tumor cells that evade the killing of antigen-specific T cells [82]. Adoptive transfer of activated antigen-specific T cells has been shown to prolong the survival of C57BL/6 and C57BL/6 RAG1-/- mice infused intracranially with B16.SIY melanoma cells [82]. Thomas et al. tested the efficiency of combined MYXV virotherapy and adoptive T cell therapy in treating metastatic melanoma brain tumor in pre-clinical syngeneic mouse model. Intratumoral injection of MYXV led to specific infection of tumor cells with the virus in the brain [82]. It has been shown that intraventricular administration of MYXV exhibits transient expression of viral proteins in a small population of normal neural stem cells, ependymal and subventricular cells, in mouse brain [83]. However, there was no evidence of those cells undergoing apoptosis despite the occurrence of early-stage replication of MYXV [83]. These studies suggest that MYXV is safe for use as virotherapeutic agent for the treatment of brain tumors [29, 66, 82, 83].
Whereas pre-treatment of B16.SIY with MYXV prior to infusion increased survival of mice, long-term survival was not achieved [82]. This suggests that there exists anti-viral mechanism(s) that prevent the spread of virus in vivo and/or the virus was cleared rapidly due to the recruitment of immune cells to the site of viral replication. It was found that the levels of IFNb and TNF were significantly increased in response to virus, indicating that viral replication maybe blocked due to the cytokine responses, therefore, preventing the virus spread [82]. It was indeed shown that injection of neutralizing antibodies against IFNb along with MYXV and adoptive 2C T cells transfer significantly prolonged survival of mice compared to those receiving MYXV injection and 2C T cells, demonstrating that IFNb induced in response to MYXV dampened the MYXV oncolytic potential [82]. Including rapamycin increased the survival of established tumor-bearing mice, as rapamycin treatment reduced the local IFNb production. Therefore, these data indicate the beneficial effect of combined immunotherapy, virotherapy, and rapamycin in treating metastatic melanoma brain tumors.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
MYXV is a relatively new oncolytic virus candidate compared to other viruses being evaluated for oncolytic properties in clinical trials. Based on the literature reviewed here, it is clear that MYXV possesses significant oncolytic potential for many types of cancers, particularly AML, MM, pancreatic cancer, and gliomas, in the pre-clinical models tested to date. Since it is well known that all animal models of cancer suffer various degrees of variance from true human cancers in situ, and the oncolytic efficacy of any virus in either immunocompetent or immunodeficient models does not necessarily predict their oncolytic behavior in humans, it will be important to next conduct properly controlled human clinical trials to test MYXV oncolytic potential to investigate if any one virus is superior to others for specific type of target cancers, and which clinical indication is best suited for each candidate virus.
In certain cases, engineered oncolytic viruses have been demonstrated to exhibit improved oncolytic potential [84-86]. In the case of MYXV, a panel of targeted gene knockout mutant viruses has been constructed and the functions of the various gene products have been studied [87]. Many of these mutant viruses have lost the ability to infect certain cultured cells (i.e., host-range restricted), and yet, they still have the ability to infect human cancer cells in vitro [88]. These single-gene deletion MYXV mutants are nonpathogenic for all known vertebrate hosts, including rabbits, and represent attractive candidates for the testing of MYXV as an oncolytic agent in human clinical trials in the future. Recently, it was reported that a recombinant MYXV expressing the F11L gene from vaccinia virus makes larger plaques when tested on primary rabbit cornea cell monolayers in culture, indicating that the virus spread from cell-to-cell more efficiently than the wild type MYXV [89]. It would be informative to examine if the MYXV recombinant expressing F11 has improved oncolysis and dissemination within various cancer tissues in situ.
Highlights.
MYXV is a candidate oncolytic virus with varying efficacies of oncolytic properties.
MYXV productively infects many classes of human cancer cells.
MYXV discriminates cancerous human myeloid cells from the normal CD34+ stem cells.
MYXV is an attractive ex vivo purging agent candidate for hematological malignancies.
MYXV possesses significant oncolytic potential for pancreatic cancer and gliomas.
Acknowledgements
GM's laboratory is supported by the Bankhead Coley Foundation of Florida, and by NIH grants R01 AI080607, R01 CA138541 and R21 CA149869.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Russell SJ, Peng KW, Bell JC. Oncolytic virotherapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jul 10;30(7):658–70. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kelly E, Russell SJ. History of oncolytic viruses: genesis to genetic engineering. Mol Ther. 2007 Apr;15(4):651–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thorne SH. Next-generation oncolytic vaccinia vectors. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;797:205–15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-340-0_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Melcher A, Parato K, Rooney CM, Bell JC. Thunder and lightning: immunotherapy and oncolytic viruses collide. Mol Ther. 2011 Jun;19(6):1008–16. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cattaneo R, Miest T, Shashkova EV, Barry MA. Reprogrammed viruses as cancer therapeutics: targeted, armed and shielded. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Jul;6(7):529–40. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ottolino-Perry K, Diallo JS, Lichty BD, Bell JC, McCart JA. Intelligent design: combination therapy with oncolytic viruses. Mol Ther. 2010 Feb;18(2):251–63. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wong HH, Lemoine NR, Wang Y. Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer Therapy: Overcoming the Obstacles. Viruses. 2010 Jan;2(1):78–106. doi: 10.3390/v2010078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bourke MG, Salwa S, Harrington KJ, Kucharczyk MJ, Forde PF, de Kruijf M, et al. The emerging role of viruses in the treatment of solid tumours. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011 Dec;37(8):618–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kirn DH, Thorne SH. Targeted and armed oncolytic poxviruses: a novel multi-mechanistic therapeutic class for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Jan;9(1):64–71. doi: 10.1038/nrc2545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kochneva GV, Sivolobova GF, Iudina KV, Babkin IV, Chumakov PM, Netesov SV. [Oncolytic poxviruses]. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 2012;(1):8–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parato KA, Breitbach CJ, Le Boeuf F, Wang J, Storbeck C, Ilkow C, et al. The oncolytic poxvirus JX-594 selectively replicates in and destroys cancer cells driven by genetic pathways commonly activated in cancers. Mol Ther. 2012 Apr;20(4):749–58. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lusky M, Erbs P, Foloppe J, Acres RB. Oncolytic vaccinia virus: a silver bullet? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010 Dec;9(12):1353–6. doi: 10.1586/erv.10.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guse K, Cerullo V, Hemminki A. Oncolytic vaccinia virus for the treatment of cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2011 May;11(5):595–608. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2011.558838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McFadden G. Poxvirus tropism. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Mar;3(3):201–13. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moss B. Poxviridae: The viruses and their replication. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. Fifth ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; Philadelphia: 2007. pp. 2905–46. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenner F. Adventures with poxviruses of vertebrates. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;24(2):123–33. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andrewes CH, Harisijades S. Propagation of myxoma virus in one-day old mice. Br J Exp Pathol. 1955 Feb;36(1):18–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McCabe VJ, Tarpey I, Spibey N. Vaccination of cats with an attenuated recombinant myxoma virus expressing feline calicivirus capsid protein. Vaccine. 2002 Jun 7;20(19-20):2454–62. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kerr P, McFadden G. Immune responses to myxoma virus. Viral Immunol. 2002;15(2):229–46. doi: 10.1089/08828240260066198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kerr PJ. Myxomatosis in Australia and Europe: a model for emerging infectious diseases. Antiviral Res. 2012 Mar;93(3):387–415. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu J, Wennier S, McFadden G. The immunoregulatory properties of oncolytic myxoma virus and their implications in therapeutics. Microbes Infect. 2010 Dec;12(14-15):1144–52. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cameron C, Hota-Mitchell S, Chen L, Barrett J, Cao JX, Macaulay C, et al. The complete DNA sequence of myxoma virus. Virology. 1999 Nov 25;264(2):298–318. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barrett JW, Cao JX, Hota-Mitchell S, McFadden G. Immunomodulatory proteins of myxoma virus. Semin Immunol. 2001 Feb;13(1):73–84. doi: 10.1006/smim.2000.0298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zuniga MC. A pox on thee! Manipulation of the host immune system by myxoma virus and implications for viral-host co-adaptation. Virus Res. 2002 Sep;88(1-2):17–33. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(02)00118-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stanford MM, Werden SJ, McFadden G. Myxoma virus in the European rabbit: interactions between the virus and its susceptible host. Vet Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;38(2):299–318. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Spiesschaert B, McFadden G, Hermans K, Nauwynck H, Van de Walle GR. The current status and future directions of myxoma virus, a master in immune evasion. Vet Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;42(1):76. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fenner F. Myxomatosis. Br Med Bull. 1959 Sep;15:240–5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lun X, Alain T, Zemp FJ, Zhou H, Rahman MM, Hamilton MG, et al. Myxoma virus virotherapy for glioma in immunocompetent animal models: optimizing administration routes and synergy with rapamycin. Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):598–608. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bartee E, McFadden G. Human cancer cells have specifically lost the ability to induce the synergistic state caused by tumor necrosis factor plus interferon-beta. Cytokine. 2009 Sep;47(3):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bartee E, Mohamed MR, Lopez MC, Baker HV, McFadden G. The addition of tumor necrosis factor plus beta interferon induces a novel synergistic antiviral state against poxviruses in primary human fibroblasts. J Virol. 2009 Jan;83(2):498–511. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01376-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang G, Barrett JW, Stanford M, Werden SJ, Johnston JB, Gao X, et al. Infection of human cancer cells with myxoma virus requires Akt activation via interaction with a viral ankyrin-repeat host range factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21;103(12):4640–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509341103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Werden SJ, McFadden G. The role of cell signaling in poxvirus tropism: the case of the M-T5 host range protein of myxoma virus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Jan;1784(1):228–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Werden SJ, McFadden G. Pharmacological manipulation of the akt signaling pathway regulates myxoma virus replication and tropism in human cancer cells. J Virol. 2010 Apr;84(7):3287–302. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02020-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang F, Ma Y, Barrett JW, Gao X, Loh J, Barton E, et al. Disruption of Erk-dependent type I interferon induction breaks the myxoma virus species barrier. Nat Immunol. 2004 Dec;5(12):1266–74. doi: 10.1038/ni1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sypula J, Wang F, Ma Y, Bell J, McFadden G. Myxoma virus tropism in human tumor cells. Gene therapy and Molecular biology. 2004;(8):103–14. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rahman MM, Madlambayan GJ, Cogle CR, McFadden G. Oncolytic viral purging of leukemic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with Myxoma virus. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010 Apr-Jun;21(2-3):169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stanford MM, McFadden G. Myxoma virus and oncolytic virotherapy: a new biologic weapon in the war against cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007 Sep;7(9):1415–25. doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.9.1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bais S, Bartee E, Rahman MM, McFadden G, Cogle CR. Oncolytic virotherapy for hematological malignancies. Adv Virol. 2012;2012:186512. doi: 10.1155/2012/186512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim M, Madlambayan GJ, Rahman MM, Smallwood SE, Meacham AM, Hosaka K, et al. Myxoma virus targets primary human leukemic stem and progenitor cells while sparing normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Leukemia. 2009 Dec;23(12):2313–7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Madlambayan GJ, Bartee E, Kim M, Rahman MM, Meacham A, Scott EW, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia targeting by myxoma virus in vivo depends on cell binding but not permissiveness to infection in vitro. Leuk Res. 2012 May;36(5):619–24. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Laubach J, Richardson P, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:249–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-070209-175325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 May;12(5):335–48. doi: 10.1038/nrc3257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bartee E, Chan WM, Moreb JS, Cogle CR, McFadden G. Selective Purging of Human Multiple Myeloma Cells from Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Grafts using Oncolytic Myxoma Virus. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:1540–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heinemann V. Gemcitabine: progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2001;60(1):8–18. doi: 10.1159/000055290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Strimpakos A, Saif MW, Syrigos KN. Pancreatic cancer: from molecular pathogenesis to targeted therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008 Sep;27(3):495–522. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9134-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Burris HA, 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403–13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shi S, Yao W, Xu J, Long J, Liu C, Yu X. Combinational therapy: new hope for pancreatic cancer? Cancer Lett. 2012 Apr 28;317(2):127–35. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bondar VM, Sweeney-Gotsch B, Andreeff M, Mills GB, McConkey DJ. Inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase-AKT pathway induces apoptosis in pancreatic carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002 Oct;1(12):989–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Woo Y, Kelly KJ, Stanford MM, Galanis C, Chun YS, Fong Y, et al. Myxoma virus is oncolytic for human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Aug;15(8):2329–35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9924-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wennier ST, Liu J, Li S, Rahman MM, Mona M, McFadden G. Myxoma virus sensitizes cancer cells to gemcitabine and is an effective oncolytic virotherapeutic in models of disseminated pancreatic cancer. Mol Ther. 2012 Apr;20(4):759–68. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Auersperg N, Wong AS, Choi KC, Kang SK, Leung PC. Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology. Endocr Rev. 2001 Apr;22(2):255–88. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.2.0422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matthews KS, Alvarez RD, Curiel DT. Advancements in adenoviral based virotherapy for ovarian cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009 Aug 10;61(10):836–41. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hirasawa K, Nishikawa SG, Norman KL, Alain T, Kossakowska A, Lee PW. Oncolytic reovirus against ovarian and colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2002 Mar 15;62(6):1696–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Myers R, Greiner S, Harvey M, Soeffker D, Frenzke M, Abraham K, et al. Oncolytic activities of approved mumps and measles vaccines for therapy of ovarian cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005 Jul;12(7):593–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lin X, Chen X, Wei Y, Zhao J, Fan L, Wen Y, et al. Efficient inhibition of intraperitoneal human ovarian cancer growth and prolonged survival by gene transfer of vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein in nude mice. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Mar;104(3):540–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nguyen TL, Abdelbary H, Arguello M, Breitbach C, Leveille S, Diallo JS, et al. Chemical targeting of the innate antiviral response by histone deacetylase inhibitors renders refractory cancers sensitive to viral oncolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):14981–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803988105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hartkopf AD, Fehm T, Wallwiener M, Lauer U. Oncolytic Viruses to Treat Ovarian Cancer Patients - a Review of Results From Clinical Trials. GebFra Science. 2012;72:132–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li S, Tong J, Rahman MM, Shepherd TG, McFadden G. Oncolytic virotherapy for ovarian cancer. Oncolytic Virotherapy. 2012 doi: 10.2147/OV.S31626. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Correa RJ, Komar M, Tong JG, Sivapragasam M, Rahman MM, McFadden G, et al. Myxoma virus-mediated oncolysis of ascites-derived human ovarian cancer cells and spheroids is impacted by differential AKT activity. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):441–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen J, McKay RM, Parada LF. Malignant glioma: lessons from genomics, mouse models, and stem cells. Cell. 2012 Mar 30;149(1):36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lyons MK, Vora SA. Brain tumors: current issues in diagnosis and management. Semin Neurol. 2007 Sep;27(4):312–24. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mohyeldin A, Chiocca EA. Gene and viral therapy for glioblastoma: a review of clinical trials and future directions. Cancer J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):82–8. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182458b13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Muik A, Dold C, Geiss Y, Volk A, Werbizki M, Dietrich U, et al. Semireplication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus as a novel platform for oncolytic virotherapy. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012 Aug;90(8):959–70. doi: 10.1007/s00109-012-0863-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wollmann G, Ozduman K, van den Pol AN. Oncolytic virus therapy for glioblastoma multiforme: concepts and candidates. Cancer J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):69–81. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31824671c9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lun X, Yang W, Alain T, Shi ZQ, Muzik H, Barrett JW, et al. Myxoma virus is a novel oncolytic virus with significant antitumor activity against experimental human gliomas. Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;65(21):9982–90. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Josiah DT, Zhu D, Dreher F, Olson J, McFadden G, Caldas H. Adipose-derived stem cells as therapeutic delivery vehicles of an oncolytic virus for glioblastoma. Mol Ther. 2010 Feb;18(2):377–85. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Beckwith JB, Palmer NF. Histopathology and prognosis of Wilms tumors: results from the First National Wilms’ Tumor Study. Cancer. 1978 May;41(5):1937–48. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1937::aid-cncr2820410538>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rorke LB, Packer RJ, Biegel JA. Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood: definition of an entity. J Neurosurg. 1996 Jul;85(1):56–65. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.1.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Parham DM, Weeks DA, Beckwith JB. The clinicopathologic spectrum of putative extrarenal rhabdoid tumors. An analysis of 42 cases studied with immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Oct;18(10):1010–29. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199410000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wu Y, Lun X, Zhou H, Wang L, Sun B, Bell JC, et al. Oncolytic efficacy of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus and myxoma virus in experimental models of rhabdoid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Feb 15;14(4):1218–27. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lun XQ, Zhou H, Alain T, Sun B, Wang L, Barrett JW, et al. Targeting human medulloblastoma: oncolytic virotherapy with myxoma virus is enhanced by rapamycin. Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 15;67(18):8818–27. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sampson JH, Carter JH, Jr., Friedman AH, Seigler HF. Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma. J Neurosurg. 1998 Jan;88(1):11–20. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rosenberg SA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009 Apr;21(2):233–40. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jager E, Ringhoffer M, Karbach J, Arand M, Oesch F, Knuth A. Inverse relationship of melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in melanoma tissues and CD8+ cytotoxic-T-cell responses: evidence for immunoselection of antigen-loss variants in vivo. Int J Cancer. 1996 May 16;66(4):470–6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960516)66:4<470::AID-IJC10>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Riker A, Cormier J, Panelli M, Kammula U, Wang E, Abati A, et al. Immune selection after antigen-specific immunotherapy of melanoma. Surgery. 1999 Aug;126(2):112–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yee C, Thompson JA, Byrd D, Riddell SR, Roche P, Celis E, et al. Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16168–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242600099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Goldberger O, Volovitz I, Machlenkin A, Vadai E, Tzehoval E, Eisenbach L. Exuberated numbers of tumor-specific T cells result in tumor escape. Cancer Res. 2008 May 1;68(9):3450–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dunn GP, Koebel CM, Schreiber RD. Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Nov;6(11):836–48. doi: 10.1038/nri1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Diaz RM, Galivo F, Kottke T, Wongthida P, Qiao J, Thompson J, et al. Oncolytic immunovirotherapy for melanoma using vesicular stomatitis virus. Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;67(6):2840–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stanford MM, Shaban M, Barrett JW, Werden SJ, Gilbert PA, Bondy-Denomy J, et al. Myxoma virus oncolysis of primary and metastatic B16F10 mouse tumors in vivo. Mol Ther. 2008 Jan;16(1):52–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Thomas DL, Doty R, Tosic V, Liu J, Kranz DM, McFadden G, et al. Myxoma virus combined with rapamycin treatment enhances adoptive T cell therapy for murine melanoma brain tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011 Oct;60(10):1461–72. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1045-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.France MR, Thomas DL, Liu J, McFadden G, MacNeill AL, Roy EJ. Intraventricular injection of myxoma virus results in transient expression of viral protein in mouse brain ependymal and subventricular cells. J Gen Virol. 2011 Jan;92(Pt 1):195–9. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.026690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gaddy DF, Lyles DS. Oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus induces apoptosis via signaling through PKR, Fas, and Daxx. J Virol. 2007 Mar;81(6):2792–804. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01760-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Stojdl DF, Lichty BD, tenOever BR, Paterson JM, Power AT, Knowles S, et al. VSV strains with defects in their ability to shutdown innate immunity are potent systemic anti-cancer agents. Cancer Cell. 2003 Oct;4(4):263–75. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00241-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wollmann G, Robek MD, van den Pol AN. Variable deficiencies in the interferon response enhance susceptibility to vesicular stomatitis virus oncolytic actions in glioblastoma cells but not in normal human glial cells. J Virol. 2007 Feb;81(3):1479–91. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01861-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Johnston JB, McFadden G. Technical knockout: understanding poxvirus pathogenesis by selectively deleting viral immunomodulatory genes. Cell Microbiol. 2004 Aug;6(8):695–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Barrett JW, Alston LR, Wang F, Stanford MM, Gilbert PA, Gao X, et al. Identification of host range mutants of myxoma virus with altered oncolytic potential in human glioma cells. J Neurovirol. 2007 Dec;13(6):549–60. doi: 10.1080/13550280701591526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Irwin CR, Evans DH. Modulation of the myxoma virus plaque phenotype by vaccinia virus protein F11. J Virol. 2012 Jul;86(13):7167–79. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06936-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]