Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2013 Jun 19;54(33):4467–4470. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.06.042

Construction of functionalized tricyclic dihydropyrazino-quinazolinedione chemotypes via an Ugi/N-acyliminium ion cyclization cascade

Steven Gunawan 1,2, Christopher Hulme 2,*
PMCID: PMC3755472  NIHMSID: NIHMS496421  PMID: 23997316

Abstract

Dihydropyrazino-quinazolinedione chemotypes are complex and structurally challenging structures of biological interest, being found in the marine alkaloids such as brevianamide M-N and fumiquinazolines A-C. Herein we report the synthesis of this tricyclic system in three synthetic operations by means of an Ugi multi-component reaction (MCR) followed by a tandem N-acyliminium ion cyclization-intramolecular nucleophilic addition reaction sequence. Additional structural diversification for further library enrichment was also accomplished via sequential N-alkylation and N-acylation/sulfonation.

Keywords: Peptidomimetics, Ugi reaction, multi-component reaction, N-acyliminium ion, heterocycles


The compelling quest to discover novel small molecules that modulate protein function has enabled access to ever-growing regions of chemical space.1 Over the past 20 years, isocyanide-based MCRs (IMCRs) have proven to be a convenient and versatile approach toward expeditious molecular diversity generation, allowing the generation of numerous unique, drug-like small molecules for biological evaluation.2 In particular, the Ugi IMCR (Scheme 1), which proceeds through reaction of an aldehyde or ketone, amines, isocyanides and carboxylic acids to produce the dipeptide-like adduct 1, has undergone many post-condensation modifications, accessing numerous new scaffolds. To cite a few examples, these post-MCR transformations comprise Ugi/deprotection/cyclization (UDC),3 Ugi/Heck,4 Ugi/Pictet-Spengler,5 Ugi/RCM,6 Ugi/Knoevenagel,7 Ugi/cycloaddition,8 Ugi/Diels-Alder,9 Ugi/Pd-catalyzed arylation,10 Ugi/Mitsunobu11 and, most recently, elegant Ugi/Aldol methodologies.12 In this context, Ugi/N-acyliminium ion sequences used to expand our toolbox of heterocyclic chemotypes are relatively underexploited, and only one article has been published that describes the synthesis of Δ5-2-oxopiperazines 3 (Scheme 2) using aminoacetaldehyde diethylacetal 2 as the carbonyl surrogate.13 However, reports do exist of N-acyliminium ion strategies being employed with other MCRs.14 Herein, post-condensation modifications of the Ugi adduct driven by N-acyliminium ion cascade reactions are reported to prepare ketopiperazine containing tricyclic chemotypes 7 (Scheme 3) whose unusual core structure is found in the marine alkaloids brevianamide M-N15 8 and 9 and fumiquinazolines A-C16 10, 11 and 12 possessing insecticidal and antineoplastic activity, respectively (Figure 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The Ugi MCR.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of Δ5-2-oxopiperazines 3

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

General Ugi/N-acyliminium ion cyclization sequences.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Brevianamide M-N (8 and 9) and fumiquinazolines A-C (1012).

Thus, studies began with evaluation of reagent compatibility for the Ugi MCR (Scheme 4). Specifically, mixing an aldehyde, 2-fluoro-5-nitro-benzoic acid 4, the ammonia surrogate 2,4-dimethoxybenzylamine 517 and 1,1-diethoxy-2-isocyanoethane 618 rendered Ugi products 13 upon overnight stirring at ambient temperature in moderate to good yields (43–82%, Table 1). It is worth noting that isocyanide 6 can be readily synthesized in two steps and has also been reported to be an extremely valuable building block for the preparation of several families of heterocycles that include imidazoles19 and thiazoles.20 Subsequent displacement of the fluorine group in 13 by a primary amine was achieved under mild conditions in DCE and afforded 14, which was subjected without purification to an acid-mediated double cyclization generating tricyclic system 7 (Table 1). Mechanistically, this pathway is presumably initiated by the generation of an oxonium ion and concomitant removal of the acid labile 2,4-dimethoxybenzyl moiety 15 (Scheme 4). Closure of the amidic nitrogen onto the oxonium ion thus leads to the formation of hemiaminal 16, which under the acidic reaction conditions affords N-acyliminium ion 18 with the associated loss of a molecule of ethanol. The sequence concludes through nucleophilic attack of the anilinic amine onto the newly formed N-acyliminium ion 18 to give the desired dihydropyrazino-quinazolinedione 7.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of dihydropyrazino-quinazolinedione 7.

Table 1.

Tricyclic analogs 7af.

Entry Ugi product R1 Yield (%) 7 R2 Yield (%)*
1 13a propyl 67 7a isobutyl 67
2 13b phenyl 78 7b isobutyl 79
3 13c 3-(methylthio)ethyl 43 7c isobutyl 41
4 13d cyclopropyl 82 7d 2-methoxyethyl 41
*

two-step yield for fluoride displacement and acid treatment

Scaffold 7 is likely to exist as an anti-diastereomer in which the two hydrogens of the two chiral centers, ‘a’ and ‘b’, are predicted to be in a pseudo-trans relationship (Figure 2). Molecular dynamics studies reveal that both enantiomers of 7a exist in a lower energy state than the corresponding pair of enantiomers (20 and 22) of the alternate diastereomer, thus suggesting preferential formation of 7a.21 Observed stereoselectivity may be explained by the steric hindrance between the propyl group and the approaching anilinic nitrogen of intermediate 19 (R-enantiomer) at the si-face that negates formation of 20 (R,R), affording 7a (R,S) as the strongly preferred product (Figure 2). In analogous fashion, si-attack on the intermediate 21 (S-enantiomer) affording 7a (S,R) (Figure 2) is suggested to be favored [Note that comparison of the relative energies of two diastereomers is only justified when assuming reversibility of reactions going through either 19 or 21, with product 7 preferred over 20 under thermodynamic control]. This configuration is in accordance with a report by Patek et al. describing the assembly of 1-acyl-3-oxopiperazines via a multi-step solid-phase synthesis.22 Unequivocal structural confirmation of 7a was also provided by X-ray crystallography (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Stereoselectivity and calculated energy for each diastereomer.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Definitive structural confirmation by X-ray crystallography of 11a.

With 7a in hand as the ‘model study’ molecule, a small collection of compounds was prepared to demonstrate the generality of the reaction sequence utilizing different aldehydes and primary amines (Table 1). Concurrently, further functionalization of 7 was also enabled via N-alkylation on the amidic nitrogen and by N-acylation and/or sulfonation upon reduction of the nitro group, leading to the addition of two further diversity points (Scheme 5). Tables 2 and 3 summarize selected alkyl bromides and acyl/sulfonyl chlorides employed to attain 23 and 24, respectively, in high overall yields.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of dihydropyrazino-quinazolinedione 7.

Table 2.

Functionalized tricyclic chemotype 23.

Entry 7 R3 23 Yield (%)
1 7a 3-methoxybenzyl 23a 94
2 7a 4-fluorophenethyl 23b 87
3 7a cyclobutylmethyl 23c 87
4 7b 3-methoxybenzyl 23d 71
5 7b 4-fluorophenethyl 23e 46

Table 3.

Functionalized tricyclic chemotype 24.

Entry 23 R4 24 Yield (%)*
1 23a CO-Ph 24a 85
2 23b SO2Me 24b 83
3 23b CO-Ph 24c 75
4 23c SO2Me 24d 80
5 23c CO-Ph 24e 89
*

two-step yield for hydrogenation and N-acylation

In summary, a concise three-step synthesis of a collection of tricyclic dihydropyrazino-quinazolinediones 7 has been successfully established with only one diastereomer formed utilizing an Ugi/N-acyliminium ion cyclization-intramolecular nucleophilic addition reaction cascade. Moreover, this scaffold can be readily diversified via sequential N-alkylation and N-acylation and/or sulfonation, adding two further variety points by means of commercially available alkyl bromides and acyl and/or sulfonyl chlorides. Due to the uniqueness of the chemotypes produced, their favorable drug-like properties, and the potential for structural diversification, this procedure represents a practical and enticing approach for the enrichment of small molecules libraries in a high-throughput and operationally friendly manner.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Sue Roberts for X-ray crystallography work, Drs. Fabio De Moliner and David M. Bishop for proofreading, and the National Institutes of Health (P41GM086190) for financial support.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.(a) Hulme C, Maggiora GM. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:257–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.04.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Burke MD, Berger EM, Schreiber SL. Science. 2003;302:613–618. doi: 10.1126/science.1089946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Dömling A, Wang W, Wang K. Chem Rev. 2012;112:3083–3135. doi: 10.1021/cr100233r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hulme C, Gore V. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:51–80. doi: 10.2174/0929867033368600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Hulme C, Peng J, Morton G, Salvino JM, Herpin T, Labaudiniere R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:7227–7230. [Google Scholar]; (b) Marcaccini S, Torroba T. Post-Condensation Modifications of the Passerini and Ugi Reactions. In: Zhu J, Bienaymé H, editors. Multicomponent Reactions. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; Weinheim: 2005. pp. 33–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Gracias V, Moore JD, Djuric SW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:417–420. [Google Scholar]; (b) Umkehrer M, Kalinski C, Kolb J, Burdack C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2391–2393. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) El Kaim L, Gageat M, Gaultier L, Grimaud L. Synlett. 2007:500–502. [Google Scholar]; (b) Znabet A, Zonneveld J, Janssen E, De Kanter FJJ, Helliwell M, Turner NJ, Ruijter E, Orru RVA. Chem Commun. 2010;46:7706–7708. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02938f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu H, Domling A. J Org Chem. 2009;74:6895–6898. doi: 10.1021/jo900986z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Banfi L, Basso A, Guanti G, Riva R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:7655–7658. [Google Scholar]; (b) Krelaus R, Westermann B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:5987–5990. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ribelin TP, Judd AS, Akritopoulou-Zanze I, Henry RF, Cross JL, Whittern DN, Djuric SW. Org Lett. 2007;9:5119–5122. doi: 10.1021/ol7023373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Beck B, Larbig G, Mejat B, Magnin-Lachaux M, Picard A, Herdtweck E, Dömling A. Org Lett. 2003;5:1047–1050. doi: 10.1021/ol034077e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marcaccini S, Pepino R, Pozo MC, Basurto S, García-Valverde M, Torroba T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:3999–4001. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Akritopoulou-Zanze I, Gracias V, Moore JD, Djuric SW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:3421–3423. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pirali T, Tron GC, Zhu J. Org Lett. 2006;8:4145–4148. doi: 10.1021/ol061782p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) El Kaïm L, Gizolme M, Grimaud L. Synlett. 2007:227–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Paulvannan K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:1851–1854. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ilyin A, Kysil V, Krasavin M, Kurashvili I, Ivachtchenko AV. J Org Chem. 2006;71:9544–9547. doi: 10.1021/jo061825f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Basso A, Banfi L, Riva R. Eur J Org Chem. 2010;2010:1831–1841. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Bonnaterre F, Bois-Choussy M, Zhu J. Org Lett. 2006;8:4351–4354. doi: 10.1021/ol061755z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ma Z, Xiang Z, Luo T, Lu K, Xu Z, Chen J, Yang Z. J Comb Chem. 2006;8:696–704. doi: 10.1021/cc060066b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Banfi L, Basso A, Guanti G, Lecinska P, Riva R. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:4236–4240. doi: 10.1039/b613056a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Banfi L, Basso A, Giardini L, Riva R, Rocca V, Guanti G. Eur J Org Chem. 2011;2011:100–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu Z, De Moliner F, Cappelli AP, Hulme C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:8037–8040. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cheng J, Chen M, Arrhenius T, Nadzan A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:6293–6295. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Airiau E, Girard N, Mann A, Salvadori J, Taddei M. Org Lett. 2009;11:5314–5317. doi: 10.1021/ol902279m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Numata A, Takahashi C, Matsushita T, Miyamoto T, Kawai K, Usami Y, Matsumura E, Inoue M, Ohishi H, Shingu T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:1621–1624. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Sheehan SM, Masters JJ, Wiley MR, Young SC, Liebeschuetz JW, Jones SD, Murray CW, Franciskovich JB, Engel DB, Weber WW, II, Marimuthu J, Kyle JA, Smallwood JK, Farmen MW, Smith GF. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:2255–2259. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00462-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Thompson MJ, Chen B. J Org Chem. 2009;74:7084–7093. doi: 10.1021/jo9014529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tangirala RS, Curran DP. Org Synth. 2005;82:18–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Bossio R, Marcaccini S, Pepino R, Polo C, Torroba T. Heterocycles. 1990;31:1287–1300. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bossio R, Marcaccini S, Pepino R. Liebigs Ann Chem. 1993;1993:1229–1231. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kazmaier U, Ackermann S. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:3184–3187. doi: 10.1039/b507028g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Molecular dynamics calculations were performed on ChemBio3D Ultra 12.0. MMF94 was performed on each molecule with maximum number of iterations of 5,000 and minimum RMS gradient of 0.100, followed by energy and gradient calculations. Finally, MMF94 molecular dynamics were performed at 2 fs (step interval), 1,000 fs (frame interval), 100,000 steps (number of iterations), 1 kcal/atom/ps (heating/cooling rate) and 300K (target temperature). Upon completion, MMF94 energy minimizations were reiterated and provided the numbers displayed in Figure 2.
  • 21.Vojkovský T, Weichsel A, Pátek M. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3162–3163. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES