Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2012 Jun 21;73(2):169–175. doi: 10.1002/pros.22552

A Novel Germline Mutation in HOXB13 Is Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk in Chinese Men

Xiaoling Lin 1,2, Lianxi Qu 2, Zhuo Chen 3, Chuanliang Xu 4, Dingwei Ye 5, Qiang Shao 6, Xiang Wang 2, Jun Qi 7, Zhiwen Chen 8, Fangjian Zhou 9,10, Meilin Wang 11, Zhong Wang 12, Dalin He 13, Denglong Wu 14, Xin Gao 15, Jianlin Yuan 16, Gongxian Wang 17, Yong Xu 18, Guozeng Wang 19, Pei Dong 9,10, Yang Jiao 7, Jin Yang 20, Jun Ou-Yang 21, Haowen Jiang 2, Yao Zhu 5, Shancheng Ren 4, Zhengdong Zhang 11, Changjun Yin 22, Qijun Wu 23, Ying Zheng 24, Aubrey R Turner 3, Sha Tao 3, Rong Na 2,3, Qiang Ding 2, Daru Lu 1,25, Rong Shi 26, Jielin Sun 3, Fang Liu 1,2, S Lilly Zheng 3, Zengnan Mo 27,28, Yinghao Sun 4, Jianfeng Xu 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC3755486  NIHMSID: NIHMS495863  PMID: 22718278

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A rare mutation G84E in HOXB13 was recently identified to be associated with prostate cancer (PCa) in Caucasians. The goal of this study is to test association between HOXB13 genetic variants and PCa risk in Chinese men.

METHODS

All study subjects were part of the Chinese Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (China PCa). In the first stage, we screened for mutations by sequencing the HOXB13 coding region in 96 unrelated PCa patients. In stage 2, G84E and novel mutations found in stage 1 were genotyped in 671 PCa patients and 1,536 controls. In stage 3, mutation status in 751 additional PCa patients was imputed via haplotype.

RESULTS

The G84E mutation was not detected in this study. However, a novel mutation, G135E, was identified among 96 patients in stage 1. It was also observed twice in 575 additional PCa patients but not in 1,536 control subjects of stage 2. The frequency of G135E was significantly different between cases and controls, with a P-value of 0.027, based on Fisher’s exact test. Haplotype estimation showed that G135E mutation carriers shared a unique haplotype that was not observed in other subjects. In stage 3, two more PCa patients were predicted to carry the G135E mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a novel rare mutation in the HOXB13 gene, G135E, which appears to be a founder mutation. This mutation is associated with increased PCa risk in Chinese men. Consistent with a previous report, our findings provide further evidence that rare mutations in HOXB13 contribute to PCa risk. Prostate 73: 169–175, 2013.

Keywords: HOXB13, G135E, G84E, prostate cancer, Chinese, rare mutation

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous cancer and second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States [1]. In China, although the incidence of PCa is much lower than that in the U.S., the incidence is increasing rapidly, especially in metropolitan areas [2]. With increasing life expectancy, PCa is becoming a major public health issue in China.

Despite the unclear etiology of PCa, the contributions of hereditary factors are well established. In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 40 independent SNPs that are consistently associated with PCa risk in Caucasians [315]. Some of these SNPs are also associated with PCa risk in the Chinese population [16,17]. However, most of the common SNPs identified by GWAS confer a relatively small-to-moderate effect, and the cumulative effect of risk SNPs can only account for a portion of PCa risk [18]. Other genetic variants, such as rare SNPs and copy number variants (CNV), are hypothesized to account for a substantial portion of the remaining genetic risk for PCa.

By sequencing over 200 genes in a PCa linkage region at 17q21-22 among 94 probands of PCa families, a rare but recurrent mutation, G84E (rs138213197), in the HOXB13 gene was found in four probands. The mutation co-segregated with PCa in these four families [19]. In a subsequent analysis of unrelated subjects, G84E frequency was observed to be significantly higher in PCa patients (1.4%) than in controls (0.1%; P = 8.5E–7), especially among PCa patients who had early age at diagnosis and a positive family history (3.1%) [19]. This mutation is located in a conserved functional domain of HOXB13, and the alteration from glycine to glutamic acid is predicted to affect protein function.

To investigate potential role of HOXB13 in PCa among Chinese men, we sequenced this gene in Chinese PCa patients and performed an association study between genetic variants of HOXB13 and PCa risk in unrelated Chinese PCa patients and controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

All of the participants in our study were part of a Chinese Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (China PCa), which was initiated in 2010 and designed to investigate the genetic determinants of PCa in Chinese men. Cases were recruited from 18 hospitals in Eastern and Southern China. PCa diagnosis was verified histologically for each participant. Cancer-free controls were collected from April 2010 to November 2010 in Shanghai, which is located in Southeastern China. A random cluster sampling method was used to select four districts and counties of Shanghai. For each selected district or county, one or two communities were selected. Inclusion criteria for controls were as follows: (1) age 40–79 years old, fully independent self-care, and has been a resident in Shanghai for more than 1 year; and (2) able to provide informed consent and provide a blood sample and complete a medical examination.

In stage 1, 96 PCa patients were randomly selected from China PCa for sequencing of the coding regions of the HOXB13 gene. In stage 2, the 96 subjects that were initially sequenced, as well as 575 PCa patients and 1,536 controls from China PCa were studied for G84E and novel mutations found in stage 1. In stage 3, additional 751 PCa patients from China PCa with GWAS data were studied. Characteristics of subjects in each stage are summarized in Table I.

TABLE I.

Characteristics of Subjects in Each Stage

Stage Number
Agea
Gleason scoreb
PSAc
Case Control Case Control <7 ≥7 Missing
1 96 NA 72.4 ± 7.9 NA 20 76 NA 32.5 (17.0, 56.0)
2 671 1536 71.9 ± 7.9 61.1 ± 9.0 175 430 66 26.7 (12.9, 78.5)
3 751 NA 70.7 ± 8.2 NA 180 565 6 25.2 (13.0, 86.6)
a

Age (year) is expressed as mean ± SD. Age for cases is age of diagnosis while age for controls is age of enrollment.

b

Number of subjects with Gleason score <7, ≥7, or with missing data.

c

PSA (ng/ml) is expressed as median (Q1, Q3).

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Fudan University, as well as each participating hospital. Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Sequencing and Genotyping

Sequencing of HOXB13 exon regions in stage 1 was conducted using the ABI 3730XL DNA analyzer. First, gene-specific primers were designed and PCR reactions were performed in a 10 μl volume consisting of 30 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.2 nM/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 mM/L MgCl2, 20 mM/L Tris–HCl, and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA). Second, each PCR product was purified using the QuickStep PCR Purification kit (Edge Biosystems, Gaitherbury, MD). Third, all sequencing reactions were performed using dye terminator chemistry (BigDye, ABI, Foster City, CA) and then precipitated using 65% ethanol. Finally, samples were loaded onto an ABI 3730XL DNA analyzer after adding 8 μl formamide. The results were analyzed using Sequencher software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI).

G84E mutation of HOXB13 and other novel mutations identified in stage 1 were genotyped among subjects in stage 2 using the iPLEX MassARRAY system (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA). Primers were designed using Spectro Designer software (Sequenom) and experiments were carried out according to the standard manufacturer’s protocol. The overall genotyping call rate was 96.9%. Laboratory technicians were blinded to case–control status.

Haplotype Estimation and Statistical Analysis

Based on GWAS data that were available for all the subjects in this study, we performed a haplotype analysis in the region of HOXB13. A 70,698 bp region (44,112,044–44,182,742, build 36) was identified based on gene structure and recombination hot spots. Eighteen SNPs in the region were selected as haplotype tagging SNPs (ht-SNPs) based on Haploview software version 4.2 [20] (Daly Lab at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA). Haplotypes of these 18 ht-SNPs for each subject were estimated by PLINK software [21]. All of the SNPs used for estimating haplotypes passed quality control criteria: P > 0.001 for the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test, minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.01, and genotype call rate >95%. A list of these SNPs is presented in Supplementary Table I.

Association analysis of HOXB13 mutations with PCa risk was performed using Fisher’s exact test by PLINK [21].

RESULTS

In stage 1, we sequenced the entire HOXB13 coding region in 96 unrelated PCa patients. We did not find any subjects carrying the G84E mutation, however, a novel nonsynonymous mutation was discovered at the second position of codon 135 (GCA to GAA, bp: 44,160,551, build 36), leading to an amino acid substitution from glycine to glutamic acid during translation (G135E). This new mutation was not observed in any ethnicity within public databases, such as dbSNP or the latest release of the NCBI 1000 Genomes Sequencing Project. In addition, we found two synonymous variants in Chinese men, S122S (rs8556) and S171S (rs9900627), with MAF of 3.6% and 19.4%, respectively.

To further explore the potential association of the G135E mutation with PCa in a Chinese population, we genotyped this mutation in 671 unrelated PCa patients (including 96 cases in stage 1) and 1,536 controls in stage 2. In addition to confirming the G135E carrier status of the subject detected using sequencing method in stage 1, we also found two more G135E carriers amongst the remaining PCa patients, while no control subjects carried this mutation. All three G135E carriers are heterozygous. The frequency of the G135E mutation between all PCa patients and cancer-free controls from stages 1 and 2 was statistically significant, with a Fisher’s exact test P-value 0.027 (Table II).

TABLE II.

Number of HOXB13 G135E Mutation Carriers in PCa Cases and Controls

G135E PCa cases Controls Fisher’s exact P-value
Carrier 3 0 0.027
Noncarrier 639 1,491

To investigate the potential founder effect of the G135E mutation, we evaluated haplotypes based on 18 ht-SNPs among 666 PCa cases and 1,006 controls in stage 2 whose GWAS data were available. We identified a haplotype “G-T-C-G-A-C-C-T-G-G-G-A-T-G-G-T-A-G” that was present only in three subjects carrying the G135E mutation but not in any other subjects. This result suggested that G135E is likely a founder mutation and individuals with this haplotype likely carry the G135E mutation.

We also estimated haplotypes based on the 18 ht-SNPs for subjects in stage 3. Two out of 751 PCa patients carried the haplotype that harbors the G135E mutation. Therefore, these two patients likely carry the G135E mutation. Characteristics of all five subjects carrying G135E mutation are presented in Table III. A wide range of PSA levels at diagnosis, Gleason scores, and age at diagnosis were observed.

TABLE III.

Characteristics of Subjects Found to Carry G135E at HOXB13

Subjects G135E Agea PSA Gleason score TNM stage PCa
1 Genotyped 72 54.0 7 T3N0M0 Yes
2 Genotyped 81 15.0 6 T2cN0M0 Yes
3 Genotyped 75 15.4 7 T3aN0M0 Yes
4 Imputedb 67 15.7 6 NA Yes
5 Imputedb 65 >100 7 TxN0M1 Yes
a

Age of diagnosis.

b

The haplotype tagging genotype for G135E is “G-T-C-G-A-C-C-T-G-G-G-A-T-G-G-T-A-G” for SNPs listed in the Supplementary Table I.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the G84E mutation of HOXB13 that was previously identified in Caucasians was not detected in the Chinese population. However, a novel rare mutation in HOXB13, G135E, was discovered in Chinese PCa patients. This mutation was associated with elevated PCa risk in Chinese men. Haplotype estimation showed that all G135E mutation carriers share the same haplotype, and this unique haplotype was only observed in the three G135E mutation carriers, indicating a potential founder effect. Moreover, in another independent study population, we found two additional PCa patients that most likely carry the G135E mutation because they carry the unique haplotype harboring the G135E mutation.

HOXB13 is located in 17q21.3, about 70 kb upstream of the HOXB gene cluster. It is composed of two exons and one intron. Exon 1 includes two MEIS (myeloid ecotropic viral integration site) binding domains, while exon 2 contains a homeodomain. These domains are highly conserved among vertebrates [2224]. The G84E rare mutation in the germ-line of Caucasians is located in the first MEIS interacting domain, while L144P, another rare mutation that was identified from a cell line, is located in the second MEIS interacting domain [19,24]. By comparing HOXB13 protein sequences among species, we found that the G135E mutation resides in the second MEIS interacting domain. The MEIS interacting domains are suspected to fine tune HOX function by regulating the interaction of HOX proteins with other DNAs and proteins [19,25], indicating a potential mechanism through which the G135E mutation affects HOXB13 function.

Given the important location of the G135E mutation, we then assessed the possible impact of the G135E mutation on the structure and function of the HOXB13 protein using PolyPhen software version 2 [26], which uses both sequence-based and structure-based information for prediction. Two datasets in PolyPhen-2 were used for estimating potentially deleterious effects. One dataset is HumDiv which contains 3,155 damaging alleles annoted in the UniProt database, while the other one, HumVar, contains 13,032 human disease-causing mutations from the UniProt database [27]. Results from each of these datasets suggested the HOXB13 G135E mutation is likely to have a deleterious effect on protein function, with a probability of 0.98 by HumDiv and 0.65 by HumVar.

Based on the location, functional prediction, and haplotype analysis, we hypothesize the HOXB13 G135E mutation is descended from a single ancestral mutation event and the deleterious effect of this mutation may contribute to elevated PCa risk among carriers in the Chinese population by altering the structure of the MEIS-binding site in the HOXB13 protein. This hypothesis should be tested by functional studies in the future.

The discovery of G135E from this Chinese population, together with the original finding of G84E mutation in Caucasian populations, suggests that rare mutations may play an important role in PCa etiology. Although few of these PCa risk-associated rare mutations have been identified to date, this was likely due to limited technology and information available in the past for assessing rare variants in the genome. It is expected that additional mutations such as this will be identified through the use of next-generation sequencing approaches and Exome SNP arrays. Rare and highly penetrant mutations such as those in HOXB13 may potentially account for the so-called “missing” heritability, a phenomenon in which only a small percentage of genetic susceptibility is accounted for by ~40 common PCa risk-associated variants discovered to date [315]. As we reconsider the common disease common variant hypothesis and expand it also to include rare variants, this should improve our understanding of the genetic architecture underlying PCa and other complex diseases.

There are several limitations in this study. First, sample size is one of the most concerning issues for association studies of rare mutations. The statistically significant association between G135E and PCa risk was based on three carriers in 671 cases and zero carriers in 1,536 controls. A larger sample size is warranted to confirm the association. Second, although the association was further supported by two more likely carriers of the G135E mutation among 751 additional PCa cases, this was based on imputation from a haplotype analysis. Further confirmation of the carrier status for these two patients by direct genotyping is needed. Finally, we were not able to test for familial aggregation of the G135E mutation because there are few families with multiple affected members available in China. The lack of familial aggregation of PCa in China likely reflects the low detection rate of PCa in China in the past, due to the low adoption rate of PSA screening. However, it has been noted that more families with multiple PCa patients have been observed in recent years; these PCa families would allow us to identify additional PCa risk-associated variants.

CONCLUSION

We identified a novel rare mutation (G135E) of the HOXB13 gene that is associated with increased PCa risk in Chinese men. Together with a previous finding of the G84E mutation in the same gene in European descent, this new finding provides further evidence that HOXB13 plays an important role in PCa etiology. These findings also provide evidence that rare and high-penetrant mutations are an important component of genetic alterations for PCa.

Supplementary Material

SuppTable1

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the subjects included in this study. This work was partially funded by the National Key Basic Research Program Grant 973 (2012CB518300) to Y.S. and J.X., the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81130047) to J.X., intramural grants from Fudan University “Thousand Talents Program” and Huashan Hospital to J.X., the National Institutes of Health (NCI CA129684) to J.X.

Footnotes

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212–236. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hsing AW, Tsao L, Devesa SS. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer. 2000;85(1):60–67. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000101)85:1<60::aid-ijc11>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, Wacholder S, Minichiello MJ, Fearnhead P, Yu K, Chatterjee N, Wang Z, Welch R, Staats BJ, Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Thun MJ, Rodriguez C, Albanes D, Virtamo J, Weinstein S, Schumacher FR, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Valeri A, Andriole GL, Gelmann EP, Tucker M, Gerhard DS, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Hoover R, Hunter DJ, Chanock SJ, Thomas G. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007;39(5):645–649. doi: 10.1038/ng2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Steinthorsdottir V, Bergthorsson JT, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, Rafnar T, Gudbjartsson D, Agnarsson BA, Baker A, Sigurdsson A, Benediktsdottir KR, Jakobsdottir M, Blondal T, Stacey SN, Helgason A, Gunnarsdottir S, Olafsdottir A, Kristinsson KT, Birgisdottir B, Ghosh S, Thorlacius S, Magnusdottir D, Stefansdottir G, Kristjansson K, Bagger Y, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Morris AD, Kimber CH, Adeyemo A, Chen Y, Zhou J, So WY, Tong PC, Ng MC, Hansen T, Andersen G, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, Tres A, Fuertes F, Ruiz-Echarri M, Asin L, Saez B, van Boven E, Klaver S, Swinkels DW, Aben KK, Graif T, Cashy J, Suarez BK, van Vierssen Trip O, Frigge ML, Ober C, Hofker MH, Wijmenga C, Christiansen C, Rader DJ, Palmer CN, Rotimi C, Chan JC, Pedersen O, Sigurdsson G, Benediktsson R, Jonsson E, Einarsson GV, Mayordomo JI, Catalona WJ, Kiemeney LA, Barkardottir RB, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. Two variants on chromosome 17 confer prostate cancer risk, and the one in TCF2 protects against type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):977–983. doi: 10.1038/ng2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Manolescu A, Amundadottir LT, Gudbjartsson D, Helgason A, Rafnar T, Bergthorsson JT, Agnarsson BA, Baker A, Sigurdsson A, Benediktsdottir KR, Jakobsdottir M, Xu J, Blondal T, Kostic J, Sun J, Ghosh S, Stacey SN, Mouy M, Saemundsdottir J, Backman VM, Kristjansson K, Tres A, Partin AW, Albers-Akkers MT, Godino-Ivan Marcos J, Walsh PC, Swinkels DW, Navarrete S, Isaacs SD, Aben KK, Graif T, Cashy J, Ruiz-Echarri M, Wiley KE, Suarez BK, Witjes JA, Frigge M, Ober C, Jonsson E, Einarsson GV, Mayordomo JI, Kiemeney LA, Isaacs WB, Catalona WJ, Barkardottir RB, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007;39(5):631–637. doi: 10.1038/ng1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murabito JM, Rosenberg CL, Finger D, Kreger BE, Levy D, Splansky GL, Antman K, Hwang SJ. A genome-wide association study of breast and prostate cancer in the NHLBI’s Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duggan D, Zheng SL, Knowlton M, Benitez D, Dimitrov L, Wiklund F, Robbins C, Isaacs SD, Cheng Y, Li G, Sun J, Chang BL, Marovich L, Wiley KE, Balter K, Stattin P, Adami HO, Gielzak M, Yan G, Sauvageot J, Liu W, Kim JW, Bleecker ER, Meyers DA, Trock BJ, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Isaacs WB, Gronberg H, Xu J, Carpten JD. Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(24):1836–1844. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thomas G, Jacobs KB, Yeager M, Kraft P, Wacholder S, Orr N, Yu K, Chatterjee N, Welch R, Hutchinson A, Crenshaw A, Cancel-Tassin G, Staats BJ, Wang Z, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Fang J, Deng X, Berndt SI, Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Thun MJ, Rodriguez C, Albanes D, Virtamo J, Weinstein S, Schumacher FR, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Cussenot O, Valeri A, Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Tucker M, Gerhard DS, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Hoover R, Hayes RB, Hunter DJ, Chanock SJ. Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2008;40(3):310–315. doi: 10.1038/ng.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Bergthorsson JT, Manolescu A, Gudbjartsson D, Agnarsson BA, Sigurdsson A, Benediktsdottir KR, Blondal T, Jakobsdottir M, Stacey SN, Kostic J, Kristinsson KT, Birgisdottir B, Ghosh S, Magnusdottir DN, Thorlacius S, Thorleifsson G, Zheng SL, Sun J, Chang BL, Elmore JB, Breyer JP, McReynolds KM, Bradley KM, Yaspan BL, Wiklund F, Stattin P, Lindstrom S, Adami HO, McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Cunningham JM, Wang L, Cerhan JR, St Sauver JL, Isaacs SD, Wiley KE, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Polo S, Ruiz-Echarri M, Navarrete S, Fuertes F, Saez B, Godino J, Weijerman PC, Swinkels DW, Aben KK, Witjes JA, Suarez BK, Helfand BT, Frigge ML, Kristjansson K, Ober C, Jonsson E, Einarsson GV, Xu J, Gronberg H, Smith JR, Thibodeau SN, Isaacs WB, Catalona WJ, Mayordomo JI, Kiemeney LA, Barkardottir RB, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2008;40(3):281–283. doi: 10.1038/ng.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Giles GG, Olama AA, Guy M, Jugurnauth SK, Mulholland S, Leongamornlert DA, Edwards SM, Morrison J, Field HI, Southey MC, Severi G, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Dearnaley DP, Muir KR, Smith C, Bagnato M, Ardern-Jones AT, Hall AL, O’Brien LT, Gehr-Swain BN, Wilkinson RA, Cox A, Lewis S, Brown PM, Jhavar SG, Tymrakiewicz M, Lophatananon A, Bryant SL, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Christmas T, Ogden C, Fisher C, Jamieson C, Cooper CS, English DR, Hopper JL, Neal DE, Easton DF. Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2008;40(3):316–321. doi: 10.1038/ng.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun J, Zheng SL, Wiklund F, Isaacs SD, Li G, Wiley KE, Kim ST, Zhu Y, Zhang Z, Hsu FC, Turner AR, Stattin P, Liu W, Kim JW, Duggan D, Carpten J, Isaacs W, Gronberg H, Xu J, Chang BL. Sequence variants at 22q13 are associated with prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2009;69(1):10–15. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Blondal T, Gylfason A, Agnarsson BA, Benediktsdottir KR, Magnusdottir DN, Orlygsdottir G, Jakobsdottir M, Stacey SN, Sigurdsson A, Wahlfors T, Tammela T, Breyer JP, McReynolds KM, Bradley KM, Saez B, Godino J, Navarrete S, Fuertes F, Murillo L, Polo E, Aben KK, van Oort IM, Suarez BK, Helfand BT, Kan D, Zanon C, Frigge ML, Kristjansson K, Gulcher JR, Einarsson GV, Jonsson E, Catalona WJ, Mayordomo JI, Kiemeney LA, Smith JR, Schleutker J, Barkardottir RB, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Rafnar T, Stefansson K. Genome-wide association and replication studies identify four variants associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1122–1126. doi: 10.1038/ng.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Al Olama AA, Giles GG, Guy M, Severi G, Muir K, Hopper JL, Henderson BE, Haiman CA, Schleutker J, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Donovan JL, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Ingles SA, John EM, Thibodeau SN, Schaid D, Park JY, Spurdle A, Clements J, Dickinson JL, Maier C, Vogel W, Dork T, Rebbeck TR, Cooney KA, Cannon-Albright L, Chappuis PO, Hutter P, Zeegers M, Kaneva R, Zhang HW, Lu YJ, Foulkes WD, English DR, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, Morrison J, Ardern-Jones AT, Hall AL, O’Brien LT, Wilkinson RA, Saunders EJ, Page EC, Sawyer EJ, Edwards SM, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Van As N, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Christmas T, Ogden C, Cooper CS, Southey MC, Lophatananon A, Liu JF, Kolonel LN, Le Marchand L, Wahlfors T, Tammela TL, Auvinen A, Lewis SJ, Cox A, FitzGerald LM, Koopmeiners JS, Karyadi DM, Kwon EM, Stern MC, Corral R, Joshi AD, Shahabi A, McDonnell SK, Sellers TA, Pow-Sang J, Chambers S, Aitken J, Gardiner RA, Batra J, Kedda MA, Lose F, Polanowski A, Patterson B, Serth J, Meyer A, Luedeke M, Stefflova K, Ray AM, Lange EM, Farnham J, Khan H, Slavov C, Mitkova A, Cao G, Easton DF. Identification of seven new prostate cancer susceptibility loci through a genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1116–1121. doi: 10.1038/ng.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schumacher J, Laje G, Abou Jamra R, Becker T, Muhleisen TW, Vasilescu C, Mattheisen M, Herms S, Hoffmann P, Hillmer AM, Georgi A, Herold C, Schulze TG, Propping P, Rietschel M, McMahon FJ, Nothen MM, Cichon S. The DISC locus and schizophrenia: Evidence from an association study in a central European sample and from a meta-analysis across different European populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(14):2719–2727. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kote-Jarai Z, Olama AA, Giles GG, Severi G, Schleutker J, Weischer M, Campa D, Riboli E, Key T, Gronberg H, Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Thun MJ, Ingles S, Chanock S, Albanes D, Hayes RB, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Pharoah P, Schumacher F, Henderson BE, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Sorensen KD, Dork T, Andriole G, Dickinson JL, Cybulski C, Lubinski J, Spurdle A, Clements JA, Chambers S, Aitken J, Gardiner RA, Thibodeau SN, Schaid D, John EM, Maier C, Vogel W, Cooney KA, Park JY, Cannon-Albright L, Brenner H, Habuchi T, Zhang HW, Lu YJ, Kaneva R, Muir K, Benlloch S, Leongamornlert DA, Saunders EJ, Tymrakiewicz M, Mahmud N, Guy M, O’Brien LT, Wilkinson RA, Hall AL, Sawyer EJ, Dadaev T, Morrison J, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Van As N, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Christmas T, Ogden C, Cooper CS, Lophatonanon A, Southey MC, Hopper JL, English DR, Wahlfors T, Tammela TL, Klarskov P, Nordestgaard BG, Roder MA, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE, Travis R, Canzian F, Kaaks R, Wiklund F, Aly M, Lindstrom S, Diver WR, Gapstur S, Stern MC, Corral R, Virtamo J, Cox A, Haiman CA, Le Marchand L, Fitzgerald L, Kolb S, Kwon EM, Karyadi DM, Orntoft TF, Borre M, Meyer A, Serth J, Yeager M, Berndt SI, Marthick JR, Patterson B, Wokolorczyk D, Batra J, Lose F, McDonnell SK, Joshi AD, Shahabi A, Rinckleb AE, Ray A, Sellers TA, Lin HY, Stephenson RA, Farnham J, Muller H, Rothenbacher D, Tsuchiya N, Narita S, Cao GW, Slavov C, Mitev V, Easton DF, Eeles RA. Seven prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified by a multi-stage genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2011;43(8):785–791. doi: 10.1038/ng.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu F, Hsing AW, Wang X, Shao Q, Qi J, Ye Y, Wang Z, Chen H, Gao X, Wang G, Chu LW, Ding Q, OuYang J, Huang Y, Chen Y, Gao YT, Zhang ZF, Rao J, Shi R, Wu Q, Wang M, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Zheng J, Hu Y, Guo L, Lin X, Tao S, Jin G, Sun J, Lu D, Zheng SL, Sun Y, Mo Z, Xu J. Systematic confirmation study of reported prostate cancer risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms in Chinese men. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(10):1916–1920. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02036.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang M, Liu F, Hsing AW, Wang X, Shao Q, Qi J, Ye Y, Wang Z, Chen H, Gao X, Wang G, Chu LW, Ding Q, OuYang J, Huang Y, Chen Y, Gao YT, Zhang ZF, Rao J, Shi R, Wu Q, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Zheng J, Hu Y, Guo L, Lin X, Tao S, Jin G, Sun J, Lu D, Zheng SL, Sun Y, Mo Z, Yin C, Zhang Z, Xu J. Replication and cumulative effects of GWAS-identified genetic variations for prostate cancer in Asians: A case–control study in the China PCa consortium. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(2):356–360. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng J, Liu F, Lin X, Wang X, Ding Q, Jiang H, Chen H, Lu D, Jin G, Hsing AW, Shao Q, Qi J, Ye Y, Wang Z, Gao X, Wang G, Chu LW, Ouyang J, Huang Y, Chen Y, Gao Y, Shi R, Wu Q, Wang M, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Sun J, Zheng SL, Xu C, Mo Z, Sun Y, Xu J. Predictive performance of prostate cancer risk in Chinese men using 33 reported prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs. Prostate. 2012;72(5):577–583. doi: 10.1002/pros.21462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ewing CM, Ray AM, Lange EM, Zuhlke KA, Robbins CM, Tembe WD, Wiley KE, Isaacs SD, Johng D, Wang Y, Bizon C, Yan G, Gielzak M, Partin AW, Shanmugam V, Izatt T, Sinari S, Craig DW, Zheng SL, Walsh PC, Montie JE, Xu J, Carpten JD, Isaacs WB, Cooney KA. Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):141–149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zeltser L, Desplan C, Heintz N. Hoxb-13: A new Hox gene in a distant region of the HOXB cluster maintains colinearity. Development. 1996;122(8):2475–2484. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.8.2475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mortlock DP, Sateesh P, Innis JW. Evolution of N-terminal sequences of the vertebrate HOXA13 protein. Mamm Genome Off J Int Mamm Genome Soc. 2000;11(2):151–158. doi: 10.1007/s003350010029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Williams TM, Williams ME, Innis JW. Range of HOX/TALE superclass associations and protein domain requirements for HOX A13: MEIS interaction. Dev Biol. 2005;277(2):457–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shen WF, Montgomery JC, Rozenfeld S, Moskow JJ, Lawrence HJ, Buchberg AM, Largman C. AbdB-like Hox proteins stabilize DNA binding by the Meis1 homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(11):6448–6458. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Casadio R. Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(22):2729–2734. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SuppTable1

RESOURCES