Abstract
Common obesity risk variants have been associated with macronutrient intake; however, these associations' generalizability across populations has not been demonstrated. We investigated the associations between 6 obesity risk variants in (or near) the NEGR1, TMEM18, BDNF, FTO, MC4R, and KCTD15 genes and macronutrient intake (carbohydrate, protein, ethanol, and fat) in 3 Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) studies: the Multiethnic Cohort Study (1993–2006) (n = 19,529), the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (1987–1989) (n = 11,114), and the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) Study, which accesses data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991–1994) (n = 6,347). We used linear regression, with adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, to estimate the associations between obesity risk genotypes and macronutrient intake. A fixed-effects meta-analysis model showed that the FTO rs8050136 A allele (n = 36,973) was positively associated with percentage of calories derived from fat (βmeta = 0.2244 (standard error, 0.0548); P = 4 × 10−5) and inversely associated with percentage of calories derived from carbohydrate (βmeta = −0.2796 (standard error, 0.0709); P = 8 × 10−5). In the Multiethnic Cohort Study, percentage of calories from fat assessed at baseline was a partial mediator of the rs8050136 effect on body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) obtained at 10 years of follow-up (mediation of effect = 0.0823 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval: 0.0559, 0.1128). Our data provide additional evidence that the association of FTO with obesity is partially mediated by dietary intake.
Keywords: energy intake, fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene, obesity, percent calories from fat, race/ethnicity
The prevalence of obesity has been increasing globally, resulting in increased rates of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers (1). Risk factors for obesity include a sedentary lifestyle, overconsumption of energy, and genetic susceptibility (2, 3). Recent genome-wide association studies have identified several common genetic variants associated with body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2), a measure of adiposity (4, 5). However, the mechanisms underlying these associations have yet to be characterized. Given that macronutrient consumption plays a key role in obesity (6), understanding the biological links between inherited genetic variation and components of energy intake may suggest strategies for reducing the increasing prevalence of obesity (7).
To date, at least 32 independent loci have been found to be associated with BMI (8). Many of the genes involved, such as the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF), the melanocortin 4 receptor gene (MC4R), and the fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO), are expressed in the central nervous system (9–11), suggesting that they may act through the neurological control of various aspects of energy balance. Indeed, studies have found that obesity risk variants in intron 1 of the FTO gene are associated with greater energy consumption (12–17) or frequency of energy consumption (18) and a reduction in satiety (19–21) and intake control (12, 22, 23). In a recent study of approximately 2,100 adults of mostly European descent (77%), McCaffery et al. (18) found that FTO rs1421085 was associated with percentage of calories derived from fat. Additionally, this and another study found that obesity risk variants in the potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing 15 gene (KCTD15) and BDNF were associated with macronutrient intake (24) or increased meat and dairy intake (18). However, many of these previous studies were conducted in populations of primarily European descent.
To further understand the relationship between obesity single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and energy consumption, we investigated, as part of the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study (25), the relationship between 6 obesity risk variants and intake of macronutrients (carbohydrate, protein, ethanol, and fat and its subtypes) among type 2 diabetes-free adults from 5 racial/ethnic groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study descriptions
The PAGE Study (25) was initiated in 2008 by the National Human Genome Research Institute and is a collaboration between a coordinating center (25) and multiple studies carried out at several different sites. PAGE is comprised of the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) Study, which accesses data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1991–1994) (26, 27); the Causal Variants Across the Life Course (CALiCo) Consortium (28); the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study (1987–1989), a substudy of CALiCo (28); and the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study (1993–2006) (29).
Information on individual study designs and population characteristics for MEC (29), ARIC (28), and EAGLE-NHANES III (26, 27, 30) has been previously published. Summary data describing the PAGE studies used in this analysis are provided in the Web Appendix (available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/). All study consents and protocols were approved by each study's respective institutional review board.
We excluded persons who reported at baseline that a physician had diagnosed them with diabetes, because obesity is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes and diet modification is recommended for these patients. We note, however, that in a sensitivity analysis, the observed associations were unchanged when participants were not excluded for diabetes (data not shown). The numbers of participants who reported being diabetes-free at baseline and were not missing information on covariates or macronutrients were 19,529 in MEC, 11,114 in ARIC, and 6,347 in EAGLE-NHANES III (totaling 36,990 participants).
Data collection
Measures of dietary intake were obtained with study-specific dietary assessment instruments. MEC used a study-specific quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (≥180 food items), which asked participants questions regarding the portion sizes and average frequencies of consumption for commonly eaten foods and mixed dishes over the past year. ARIC used a semiquantitative FFQ (66 food items), which was modified from the 61-item Willett FFQ (31) and assessed the average frequency of commonly consumed foods over the past year. In EAGLE-NHANES III, a single 24-hour dietary recall was administered by a trained interviewer during the participant's physical examination (32).
Investigators calculated macronutrient intakes similarly at all of the study sites. The daily nutrient amount for a given food was calculated by multiplying the usual portion size (in grams) by the number of times the food was eaten per day and its nutrient content, determined from study-specific food composition values that were mostly derived from US Department of Agriculture data (33). A participant's total daily consumption (g/day) of fat, protein, carbohydrate, and ethanol was calculated by summing data for the respective macronutrient across all food items. These values were then converted into calories by multiplying the total grams of the macronutrient by the number of calories per gram (1 g of fat = 9 calories, 1 g of protein or carbohydrate = 4 calories, and 1 g of ethanol = 7 calories). To account for differential completeness in the dietary intake assessment methods across studies, our primary strategy was to express each macronutrient as nutrient densities, where the percentage of energy derived from a macronutrient was computed by dividing the calories from that macronutrient by the sum of calories from all 4 macronutrients (i.e., carbohydrate, protein, fat, and alcohol).
SNP selection
We investigated 6 obesity risk variants in (or near) genes expressed in the central nervous system that could be related to energy balance (9–11): neuronal growth regulator 1 gene (NEGR1) variant rs2815752, transmembrane protein 18 gene (TMEM18) variant rs6548238, BDNF rs6265, FTO rs8050136, MC4R rs17782313, and KCTD15 rs11084753. These SNPs were selected from the National Human Genome Research Institute's genome-wide association studies catalog (34) as having been associated with BMI as of December 31, 2008, and were genotyped in all 3 participating studies. Details regarding genotyping and quality control have been previously published (35) and can be found in the Web Appendix.
Statistical analysis
The relationship of the obesity SNPs with BMI was initially examined in each study population. Subsequently, the relationship of these risk variants with macronutrient intakes in each study was investigated. The linear models regressing BMI or the nutrient value on genotype assumed an additive genetic model and adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, and race/ethnicity. All parameter estimates were modeled for the obesity risk allele (associated with increased BMI). The distributions for total energy intake, percentage of energy derived from ethanol, and BMI did not meet the model assumptions. Therefore, the variables were log-transformed (as log(x + 1)). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
To test for heterogeneity by race/ethnicity and sex within each study, we used an F test in which we compared a model that included the main effects and cross-product terms of the SNP and race/ethnicity or sex with a model including only the main-effect terms.
A meta-analysis of results across studies was performed using STATA, version 10 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas). Both the fixed-effects and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were considered. Heterogeneity of the regression coefficients was tested using Cochran's Q statistic. Sex- and race-specific meta-analyses were also conducted.
Associations that remained significant after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.05/[6 SNPs × 8 macronutrients × 3 studies] =3.5 × 10−4) were further examined. Specifically, we then examined the associations of the SNP with macronutrient intake, adjusting for energy intake using the method of residuals (36). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted by additionally adjusting the gene-macronutrient associations for energy intake, baseline BMI, and energy expenditure. In order to identify the potential temporal stability of our findings, we tested these associations using a repeated measure of macronutrient intake and BMI collected after approximately 10 years of follow-up (available in MEC only). With these prospective data, we also performed a mediation analysis using a program created by Preacher and Hayes (37), where the mediation of effect was estimated by bootstrapping (1,000 times) the indirect effect of baseline diet on the relationship between the SNP and BMI obtained at 10 years of follow-up.
RESULTS
The MEC participants (n = 19,529 men and women) were the oldest (median age, 68 years) and most ethnically diverse (only 17.8% European Americans) study population (Table 1). The ARIC participants (n = 11,114 men and women) included African Americans (22.1%) and European Americans (77.9%) and had a median age of 54 years. The EAGLE-NHANES III participants (n = 6,347 men and women) included African Americans (30.0%), Latinos (28.2%), European Americans (36.9%), and persons of other races (4.9%) and were the youngest study population (median age, 36 years). Using a median test, we found that the median values for percentage of calories derived from fat and protein differed across the 3 PAGE study populations (P < 0.001). The race/ethnicity-specific frequencies of the obesity risk allele for all 6 SNPs were similar across the 3 PAGE studies (Web Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristic | Study Population |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEC (1993–1996) (n = 19,529) |
CALiCo: ARIC (1987–1989) (n = 11,114) |
EAGLE-NHANES III (1991–1994) (n = 6,347) |
||||
% | Median (IQRa) | % | Median (IQR) | % | Median (IQR) | |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 51.7 | 44.6 | 43.6 | |||
Female | 48.3 | 55.4 | 56.4 | |||
Race/ethnicity | ||||||
African-American | 18.6 | 22.1 | 30.0 | |||
Asian-American | 28.2 | |||||
Latino | 25.9 | 28.2 | ||||
Pacific Islander | 9.6 | |||||
European-American | 17.8 | 77.9 | 36.9 | |||
Other | 4.9 | |||||
Age, years | 68 (62–74) | 54 (49–59) | 36 (23–56) | |||
Body mass indexb | 26.1 (23.6–29.2) | 26.4 (23.7–29.8) | 25.7 (22.3–29.8) | |||
Daily macronutrient intake | ||||||
Total energy, kcal | 1,965 (1,468–2,635) | 1,542 (1,202–1,969) | 1,974 (1,433–2,659) | |||
% of calories from carbohydrate | 52.3 (46.5–58.4) | 49.0 (42.8–54.9) | 51.0 (43.7–58.4) | |||
% of calories from protein | 14.6 (12.9–16.4) | 18.0 (15.0–20.2) | 14.7 (12.0–17.7) | |||
% of calories from fat | 30.2 (25.2–34.8) | 33.0 (28.5–37.3) | 33.3 (27.0–39.3) | |||
% of calories from ethanol | 0.19 (0–2.74) | 0.0 (0–3.2) | 0.0 (0–0) |
Abbreviations: ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; CALiCo, Causal Variants Across the Life Course; EAGLE, Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment; IQR, interquartile range; MEC, Multiethnic Cohort; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PAGE, Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology.
a 25th–75th percentiles.
b Weight (kg)/height (m)2.
The associations between these obesity risk variants (with the exception of BDNF rs6265) and BMI were examined in the PAGE populations in a previous study (38). Similar to these prior findings, when using the 3 study populations for the present analysis, the strongest association we observed was between FTO rs8050136 and log-BMI (MEC: P = 7.2 × 10−10; ARIC: P = 7.2 × 10−10; EAGLE-NHANES III: P = 0.046). Among 3 of the other 5 SNPs—TMEM18 rs6548238, BDNF rs6265, and MC4R rs17782313—weaker or null associations were observed in individual studies but statistically significant associations were found when the data were meta-analyzed across studies (P's < 0.0005). Meta-analysis of NEGR1 rs2815752 and KCTD15 rs11084753 showed suggestive and null associations (P = 0.07 and P = 0.21, respectively).
When investigating the relationships of these obesity risk variants with macronutrient intake in the 3 PAGE studies, we detected associations for FTO rs8050136 with percentages of calories from carbohydrate, protein, and fat in MEC and ARIC (MEC: P's = 5 × 10−3, 0.02, and 3 × 10−3, respectively; ARIC: P's = 3 × 10−3, 5 × 10−6, and 0.02, respectively). In EAGLE-NHANES III, only a nominal association with percentage of calories derived from fat (P = 0.07) was detected. For the other genes, we found no associations that passed multiple test correction (Web Table 2).
In the meta-analysis, FTO rs8050136 was positively associated with percentage of calories derived from fat (βmeta = 0.2244 (standard error (SE), 0.0548); Pmeta = 4 × 10−5) and inversely associated with percentage of calories derived from carbohydrate (βmeta = −0.2796 (SE, 0.0709); Pmeta = 8 × 10−5) (Table 2). The positive association with percentage of calories from fat was observed for all major fat subtypes—that is, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and saturated fat (Pmeta's < 5 × 10−3), although the strongest association was found with monounsaturated fat (βmeta = 0.0843 (SE, 0.0229); Pmeta = 2 ×10−4). Heterogeneity across studies was detected for the association with percentage of calories derived from protein (Pheterogeneity = 0.004). Therefore, for that meta-regression, the random-effects model was used. In the meta-analysis, no associations were detected for rs8050136 with percentages of calories from protein and alcohol or with total energy intake (Pmeta's > 0.05) (Table 2), although an inverse association with total energy intake was observed in ARIC (β = −0.0103 (SE, 0.0049); P = 0.03). No associations with macronutrient intake were observed for the other 5 obesity risk variants in the meta-analysis (P's > 0.003) (Web Table 2).
Table 2.
Study Population |
P-heterogeneitya | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEC (1993–1996) (n = 19,529) |
CALiCo: ARIC (1987–1989) (n = 11,114) |
EAGLE-NHANES III (1991–1994) (n = 6,330) |
Meta-Analysis (n = 36,973) |
||||||||||
βb | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | ||
Total energy intake, kcal/day | −0.0006 | 0.0048 | 0.90 | −0.0103 | 0.0049 | 0.03 | 0.0125 | 0.0084 | 0.14 | −0.0028 | 0.0032 | 0.38 | 0.05 |
% of calories from carbohydrate | −0.2624 | 0.0940 | 5 × 10−3 | −0.3716 | 0.1259 | 3 × 10−3 | −0.1088 | 0.2104 | 0.61 | −0.2796 | 0.0709 | 8 × 10−5 | 0.54 |
% of calories from proteinc | 0.0730 | 0.0307 | 0.02 | 0.2511 | 0.0548 | 5 × 10−6 | −0.0411 | 0.0881 | 0.64 | 0.1040 | 0.0735 | 0.16 | 0.004 |
% of calories from fat | 0.2206 | 0.0750 | 3 × 10−3 | 0.2071 | 0.0909 | 0.02 | 0.3064 | 0.1718 | 0.07 | 0.2244 | 0.0548 | 4 × 10−5 | 0.88 |
% of calories from alcohol | 0.0004 | 0.0102 | 0.97 | −0.0006 | 0.0130 | 0.96 | −0.0254 | 0.0177 | 0.15 | −0.0043 | 0.0073 | 0.55 | 0.05 |
% of calories from specific types of fat | |||||||||||||
Polyunsaturated fat | 0.0562 | 0.0211 | 8 × 10−3 | 0.0147 | 0.0197 | 0.45 | 0.1444 | 0.0659 | 0.03 | 0.0391 | 0.0141 | 5 × 10−3 | 0.09 |
Monounsaturated fat | 0.0724 | 0.0302 | 0.02 | 0.0951 | 0.0400 | 0.02 | 0.1182 | 0.0739 | 0.11 | 0.0843 | 0.0229 | 2 × 10−4 | 0.80 |
Saturated fat | 0.0725 | 0.0267 | 7 × 10−3 | 0.0632 | 0.0404 | 0.12 | 0.0349 | 0.0726 | 0.63 | 0.0667 | 0.0213 | 2 × 10−3 | 0.88 |
Abbreviations: ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; CALiCo, Causal Variants Across the Life Course; EAGLE, Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment; MEC, Multiethnic Cohort; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PAGE, Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology; SE, standard error.
a Heterogeneity by study.
b Slope from regression of macronutrient intake on FTO rs8050136, using an additive genetic model, adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, and race/ethnicity. This represents the change in the level of the nutrient, such as percentage of energy derived from fat, associated with a change in 1 variant allele.
c Because of heterogeneity by study, the meta-analyzed results from the random-effects model are presented.
We found that the meta-analyzed associations between rs8050136 and percentages of calories from carbohydrate and fat were consistent across the sexes (Pheterogeneity = 0.42 and Pheterogeneity = 0.70, respectively) (Web Table 3). Within-study, heterogeneity by sex was detected only in MEC, where the association between rs8050136 and percentage of calories derived from fat appeared to be stronger in men than in women (Pheterogeneity = 0.03).
The associations of rs8050136 with percentages of calories from fat and carbohydrate were consistent across the 5 racial/ethnic groups (Pheterogeneity ≥ 0.10) (Web Table 4). Rs8050136 was positively associated with percentage of calories from fat and inversely associated with percentage of calories from carbohydrate among both African Americans (βmeta = 0.2549 (SE, 0.1150; Pmeta = 0.03) for fat and βmeta = −0.3013 (SE, 0.1540; Pmeta = 0.05) for carbohydrate) and European Americans (βmeta = 0.1624 (SE, 0.0844; Pmeta = 0.05) for fat and βmeta = −0.2248 (SE, 0.1119; Pmeta = 0.04) for carbohydrate). The relationships for Latinos and Asian Americans pointed in the same directions as those in EAGLE-NHANES III and MEC and in the overall data (Web Table 4).
Table 3 presents the study-specific and meta-analyzed results for the association between rs8050136 and percentage of calories from fat or from carbohydrate, after additional adjustment for total energy intake, physical activity, and BMI. Meta-analyzed results showed, per allele change, a 0.1800-percentage-point increase in consumption of percentage of calories from fat (Pmeta = 1 × 10−3) and a 0.2172-percentage-point decrease in consumption of percentage of calories from carbohydrate (Pmeta = 3 × 10−3). Additionally, similar results were obtained when using macronutrient intakes in grams per day, adjusted for energy intake by the residual method (36), with further adjustment for total energy intake in the model. We found that each “A” allele change was associated with a 0.4422-g/day increase in fat intake (Pmeta = 4 × 10−5) and a 1.2735-g/day decrease in carbohydrate intake (Pmeta = 9 × 10−5) (Web Table 5).
Table 3.
Macronutrient | Study Population |
P-heterogeneitya | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEC (1993–1996) (n = 19,529) |
CALiCo: ARIC (1987–1989) (n = 11,114) |
EAGLE-NHANES III (1991–1994) (n = 6,330) |
Meta-Analysis (n = 36,973) |
||||||||||
β | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | β | SE | P Value | ||
% of calories from carbohydrate | |||||||||||||
Model 1b | −0.1996 | 0.0940 | 0.03 | −0.3784 | 0.1259 | 3 × 10−3 | −0.0759 | 0.2473 | 0.76 | −0.2477 | 0.0721 | 6 × 10−4 | 0.40 |
Model 2c | −0.2365 | 0.0972 | 0.01 | −0.3224 | 0.1259 | 0.01 | −0.0924 | 0.2104 | 0.66 | −0.2478 | 0.0723 | 6 × 10−4 | 0.63 |
Model 3d | −0.1767 | 0.0972 | 0.07 | −0.3287 | 0.1260 | 9 × 10−3 | −0.0497 | 0.2472 | 0.84 | −0.2172 | 0.0735 | 3 × 10−3 | 0.49 |
% of calories from fat | |||||||||||||
Model 1 | 0.1647 | 0.0748 | 0.03 | 0.2360 | 0.0901 | 9 × 10−3 | 0.3254 | 0.2028 | 0.11 | 0.2036 | 0.0554 | 2 × 10−4 | 0.68 |
Model 2 | 0.2075 | 0.0775 | 7 × 10−3 | 0.1612 | 0.0908 | 0.07 | 0.3029 | 0.1719 | 0.08 | 0.2000 | 0.0558 | 3 × 10−4 | 0.76 |
Model 3 | 0.1512 | 0.0773 | 0.05 | 0.1962 | 0.0912 | 0.03 | 0.2987 | 0.2026 | 0.14 | 0.1800 | 0.0566 | 1 × 10−3 | 0.77 |
Abbreviations: ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; CALiCo, Causal Variants Across the Life Course; EAGLE, Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment; MEC, Multiethnic Cohort; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PAGE, Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology; SE, standard error.
a Heterogeneity by study.
b Slope from regression of the exposure variable on FTO rs8050136, using an additive genetic model, adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, race/ethnicity, and baseline body mass index.
c Slope from regression of the exposure variable on FTO rs8050136, using an additive genetic model, adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, race/ethnicity, total energy intake, and energy expenditure.
d Model 2 with additional adjustment for baseline body mass index.
In the MEC Study, similar associations were observed with diet assessed after approximately 10 years of follow-up (median follow-up time, 10.5 years; n = 10,766 participants with such data). For a per-allele change, we found a 0.3397-percentage-point increase in percentage of calories from fat (P = 1 × 10−3) and a 0.3054-percentage-point decrease in percentage of calories from carbohydrate (P = 0.02). The geometric mean values are presented by genotype in Table 4. The association with percentage of calories from fat after 10 years remained after further adjustment for BMI at baseline or BMI after 10 years (P = 0.01) and was suggested after exclusion of persons who may have altered their diet due to a diabetes diagnosis during follow-up (n = 5,350) (P = 0.12). Using the same data, we confirmed the association between rs8050136 and the BMI value at 10 years of follow-up (P < 0.001) (data not shown). In a mediation analysis (37), we found that percentage of calories from fat at baseline was a partial mediator in the relationship between rs8050136 and BMI obtained 10 years later (mediation of effect = 0.0823 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval: 0.0559, 0.1128).
Table 4.
FTO rs8050136 Genotype |
P-trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC |
CA |
AA |
|||||
Geometric Mean |
SE | Geometric Mean |
SE | Geometric Mean |
SE | ||
% of calories from carbohydrate | |||||||
Model 1a | 50.43 | 0.12 | 49.91 | 0.13 | 50.10 | 0.27 | 0.02 |
Model 2b | 50.52 | 0.12 | 50.06 | 0.13 | 50.33 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
Model 3c | 50.47 | 0.13 | 50.00 | 0.14 | 50.29 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
Participants who were diabetes-free during the 10 years postbaselineb | 50.92 | 0.18 | 50.34 | 0.20 | 50.72 | 0.38 | 0.11 |
% of calories from fat | |||||||
Model 1 | 31.32 | 0.10 | 31.69 | 0.11 | 31.96 | 0.22 | 0.001 |
Model 2 | 31.21 | 0.10 | 31.49 | 0.11 | 31.67 | 0.21 | 0.01 |
Model 3 | 31.26 | 0.10 | 31.57 | 0.11 | 31.75 | 0.22 | 0.01 |
Participants who were diabetes-free during the 10 years postbaseline | 30.73 | 0.14 | 31.01 | 0.16 | 31.12 | 0.30 | 0.12 |
Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
a Results were adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, race/ethnicity, and follow-up time.
b Model 1 with additional adjustment for baseline body mass index.
c Model 1 with additional adjustment for body mass index at the time of diet measurement.
DISCUSSION
This study investigated the association of 6 obesity risk variants with total energy intake and percentage of calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, fat, and ethanol in multiple ethnically diverse adult populations. We found that the obesity-risk allele for FTO rs8050136 was positively associated with percentage of calories from fat and inversely associated with percentage of calories from carbohydrate. There was no heterogeneity in these findings across studies or across meta-regressed strata of sex or race/ethnicity.
To date, more than 30 genetic loci have been found to be associated with BMI, many in or near genes expressed in the central nervous system (9). Among the 6 loci examined in this study, polymorphisms in intron 1 of the FTO gene have shown the strongest association with BMI among European Americans (39, 40). As previously reported, in an earlier PAGE analysis, rs8050136 showed the strongest associations with log-BMI across PAGE populations—European Americans (n = 26,544, P = 7.1 × 10−10), Latinos (n = 3,674, P = 0.001), and Asian Americans (n = 2,325, P = 0.01)—and was suggestively associated with log-BMI among African Americans (n = 9,435, P = 0.13) (38). FTO is expressed across multiple tissues, but particularly in the hypothalamus (39, 41, 42), suggesting a role in energy homeostasis through a possible influence on energy balance. In mice, Fto mRNA overexpression in the hypothalamus results in decreased food intake, whereas knockdown of Fto expression results in increased intake (43). However, fasting experiments in animals have yielded inconsistent results on the hypothalamic expression of Fto (42, 44–46). In human adipose tissue, higher FTO mRNA expression has been observed in morbidly obese women's visceral adipose tissue (BMI >40) as compared with lean women's (BMI <25) (47).
The positive association we found between rs8050136 and fat intake (percentage of calories or g/day) is consistent with previous reports. Three of 4 studies conducted in children have found statistically significant positive associations between the obesity risk allele (A) of rs9939609 (in high linkage disequilibrium with rs8050136 (HapMap US residents of European ancestry: r2 > 0.84)) and measures of relative (percentage of energy) or absolute (g/day) fat intake (12, 13, 22, 48). The study that did not detect an association was conducted in a multiethnic youth population (median age, 15 years) (48). Four studies conducted in adults (15, 16, 18, 24), with sample sizes less than 2,100, found either a positive (18, 24) or a null (15, 16) relationship between measures of relative or absolute fat intake and genetic variants in FTO; however, a P value less than 0.05 was observed in only 1 study (18).
We also found an inverse association between FTO rs8050136 and carbohydrate intake (percentage of calories or g/day). A similar inverse relationship has been reported in 3 past studies, although all had P values greater than 0.05 (16, 18, 22). In contrast, a positive relationship was observed in 3 other studies (12, 13, 15), with only 1 study detecting an association (P < 0.05) (12).
Past studies of FTO and diet were largely conducted in European Americans. While 2 studies included European Americans and African Americans (18, 48), race-specific findings were not reported. The largest nonwhite study included only 502 African-American youths (median age, 15 years) (48). Our study appears to be the largest and most ethnically diverse to date. No heterogeneity in magnitude or direction was found for the positive association between rs8050136 and percentage of calories derived from fat across racial/ethnic groups. The race-specific association was statistically significant in the 7,953 African Americans and 1,872 Native Hawaiians included in our analysis and showed a positive direction of association in the 6,864 Latinos and 5,800 Asian Americans.
Three past studies investigated whether dietary fat modified the association between the FTO obesity risk genotype and BMI (the SNPs studied were in high linkage disequilibrium with rs8050136 in US residents of European ancestry (r2 > 0.84)) (17, 49, 50). Two of these studies found that saturated fat in grams per day (P = 0.03) (50) or percentage of calories derived from fat (P = 0.02) (17) positively modified the association of FTO with BMI. However, we did not detect such an interaction in our study for percentage of calories from fat or from specific types of fat.
Unlike some previous studies, we found no evidence for an association between the obesity risk allele for rs8050136 and total energy intake in MEC or EAGLE-NHANES III or in our meta-analysis. In ARIC, an association was detected (P = 0.03); however, it was in the direction opposite that reported in the past. Eight previous studies that investigated the association between the FTO locus and dietary intake were conducted in children and mostly middle-aged adults (median ages, 38–57 years), primarily in European Americans. In 5 of these 8 studies, an increase in the number of obesity-risk alleles in FTO rs9939609 was associated with greater consumption of energy or energy-dense foods (12, 13, 15, 16) or number of eating occasions (18). Multiple food diaries (12, 15, 16) or a single test meal (13) was used in the 4 studies that found an association with energy or energy-dense foods. The 4 other studies that did not observe such an association measured dietary intake with FFQs (18, 24), two 24-hour recalls (48), or a test meal (22).
Additionally, in contrast to some of the previous reports, we found no association between 5 other obesity SNPs (NEGR1 rs2815752, TMEM18 rs6548238, BDNF rs6265, MC4R rs17782313, and KCTD15 rs11084753) and macronutrient intake (18, 24). One past study found that SNPs in or near the SH2B adapter protein 1 gene (SH2B1), KCTD15, the mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 gene (MTCH2), NEGR1, and BDNF were associated with consumption of macronutrients (P's < 0.05) (24). In addition to the previously mentioned association between FTO rs1421085 and percentage of calories from fat, McCaffery et al. (18) found associations of BDNF SNPs with decreased total energy intake and increased servings for specific dairy foods, meat, eggs, nuts, and beans; an association of SH2B1 rs4788099 with increased servings of dairy products; and an association of the troponin I, cardiac muscle (TNNI3) interacting kinase gene (TNNI3K) with a lower percentage of calories from protein. The SH2B1 and TNNI3K SNPs were not genotyped in all 3 of our PAGE study populations. We did not observe any associations between BDNF rs6265 and macronutrient intake or specific foods in our study (data not shown).
The inconsistencies in results across studies may reflect differences in populations. The associations between the 6 obesity SNPs and BMI were identified in populations of primarily younger adults and persons of European ancestry (51, 52). In addition, discovery of the relevant functional variant(s) at each obesity risk locus for each ethnic group would help to increase understanding of the underlying biology and possibly facilitate the identification of other potential dietary relationships.
Although we found that rs8050136 was associated with fat intake, as opposed to total energy intake, it is possible that for carriers of the FTO variant this association reflects a preference for fat intake, thereby resulting in greater consumption of energy. Previous studies have shown that energy-dense diets are associated with a higher percentage of calories from fat and a lower percentage of calories from carbohydrate (53, 54). Furthermore, our failure to detect an association with energy intake may have been due to the measurement error associated with FFQs and a single 24-hour recall and the resulting loss of power (36, 55). The differential underreporting of energy intake with these dietary assessment methods in subjects with an elevated BMI (56–58) could have attenuated a positive association by leading carriers of the obesity risk allele, who tend to have higher BMIs, to underreport their energy intake. We observed such an inverse relationship between rs8050136 and total energy intake in the ARIC data but not in the other 2 studies.
It remains possible that the relationship between rs8050136 and BMI may have influenced our findings due to reverse causation, given that heavier persons consume more calories and energy-dense foods. Indeed, when additionally adjusting for BMI, we observed an attenuation of estimates for both percentage of calories from fat and percentage of calories from carbohydrate. However, despite this attenuation, the association of the FTO variant with percentage of fat calories remained (P ≤ 1 × 10−3). The association also remained when using dietary fat measured after 10 years of follow-up. Furthermore, we found in the MEC that percentage of calories from fat assessed at baseline was a partial mediator of the association between rs8050136 and BMI obtained 10 years later. Thus, these results suggest that the association between rs8050136 and dietary fat is robust.
To our knowledge, this is the largest and most ethnically diverse study to have investigated the relationship of obesity risk variants with energy and macronutrient consumption. Additional strengths include our ability to adjust for a variety of potential confounders and to examine the stability of the relationship during follow-up in the MEC.
In summary, the consistency of our findings across ethnic groups, study populations, and dietary assessment methods provides substantial support for an association between the FTO intron 1 obesity locus and a modestly increased intake of energy from fat. Our data provide additional evidence for the notion that the association of FTO with obesity is mediated by dietary intake.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Author affiliations: Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii (Sungshim Lani Park, Unhee Lim, Christian P. Caberto, Laurence N. Kolonel, Lynne R. Wilkens, Loïc Le Marchand); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California (Iona Cheng); Center for Systems Genomics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (Sarah A. Pendergrass, Marylyn D. Ritchie); Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Anna M. Kucharska-Newton, Shelly-Ann Love, Kari E. North, Gerardo Heiss); Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California (Jose Luis Ambite); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (Kristine R. Monroe, Fredrick Schumacher, Brian E. Henderson, Christopher A. Haiman); Office of Population Genomics, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Lucia A. Hindorff); Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (Matthew T. Oetjens, Sarah Wilson, Robert J. Goodloe, Dana C. Crawford); Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (Dana C. Crawford); and Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Kari E. North).
The Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study is funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), supported by grants U01HG004803 (Genetic Epidemiology of Causal Variants Across the Life Course (CALiCo) Consortium), U01HG004798 (Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) Study), U01HG004802 (Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study), U01HG004790 (Women's Health Initiative), and U01HG004801 (PAGE Coordinating Center), and their respective NHGRI American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) supplements. The data and materials included in this report resulted from a collaboration between the following studies: The EAGLE Study is funded through the NHGRI PAGE Study (grant U01HG004798-01 and its NHGRI ARRA supplement). The study participants were derived from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The MEC characterization of epidemiologic architecture is funded through the NHGRI PAGE Study (grant U01HG004802 and its NHGRI ARRA supplement). The MEC Study is funded by the National Cancer Institute (grants R37CA54281, R01 CA63, P01CA33619, U01CA136792, and U01CA98758). Funding for CALiCo was provided through the NHGRI PAGE Study (grant U01HG004803). The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01HL087641, R01HL59367, and R01HL086694; NHGRI contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health (NIH) contract HHSN268200625226C. The infrastructure of the ARIC Study was partly supported by grant UL1RR025005, a component of the NIH and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Assistance with phenotype harmonization, single-nucleotide polymorphism selection and annotation, data-cleaning, data management, integration, and dissemination, and general study coordination was provided by the PAGE Coordinating Center (grant U01HG004801). The National Institute of Mental Health also contributes support for the Coordinating Center.
We thank all study staff for their important contributions.
The complete list of PAGE members can be found at http://www.pagestudy.org.
The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIH or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kopelman P. Health risks associated with overweight and obesity. Obes Rev. 2007;8(suppl 1):13–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wardle J, Carnell S, Haworth CM, et al. Evidence for a strong genetic influence on childhood adiposity despite the force of the obesogenic environment. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(2):398–404. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hjelmborg JVB, Fagnani C, Silventoinen K, et al. Genetic influences on growth traits of BMI: a longitudinal study of adult twins. Obesity. 2008;16(4):847–852. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saunders CL, Chiodini BD, Sham P, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage studies in BMI and obesity. Obesity. 2007;15(9):2263–2275. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCarthy MI. Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(24):2339–2350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0906948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and Obesity—Causes and Consequences. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/causes/index.html. (Accessed January 10, 2012) [Google Scholar]
- 7.World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Speliotes EK, Willer CJ, Berndt SI, et al. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nat Genet. 2010;42(11):937–948. doi: 10.1038/ng.686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hofker M, Wijmenga C. A supersized list of obesity genes. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):139–140. doi: 10.1038/ng0209-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berthoud H-R, Morrison C. The brain, appetite, and obesity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59(1):55–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yoganathan P, Karunakaran S, Ho M, et al. Nutritional regulation of genome-wide association obesity genes in a tissue-dependent manner. Nutr Metab. 2012;9(1):E65. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Timpson NJ, Emmett PM, Frayling TM, et al. The fat mass- and obesity-associated locus and dietary intake in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(4):971–978. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cecil JE, Tavendale R, Watt P, et al. An obesity-associated FTO gene variant and increased energy intake in children. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(24):2558–2566. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wardle J, Llewellyn C, Sanderson S, et al. The FTO gene and measured food intake in children. Int J Obes. 2008;33(1):42–45. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Speakman JR, Rance KA, Johnstone AM. Polymorphisms of the FTO gene are associated with variation in energy intake, but not energy expenditure. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1961–1965. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haupt A, Thamer C, Staiger H, et al. Variation in the FTO gene influences food intake but not energy expenditure. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009;117(4):194–197. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1087176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sonestedt E, Roos C, Gullberg B, et al. Fat and carbohydrate intake modify the association between genetic variation in the FTO genotype and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1418–1425. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McCaffery JM, Papandonatos GD, Peter I, et al. Obesity susceptibility loci and dietary intake in the Look AHEAD Trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(6):1477–1486. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.026955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rutters F, Lemmens SGT, Born JM, et al. Genetic associations with acute stress-related changes in eating in the absence of hunger. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):367–371. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wardle J, Carnell S, Haworth CM, et al. Obesity associated genetic variation in FTO is associated with diminished satiety. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3640–3643. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.den Hoed M, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Bouwman FG, et al. Postprandial responses in hunger and satiety are associated with the rs9939609 single nucleotide polymorphism in FTO. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1426–1432. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tanofsky-Kraff M, Han JC, Anandalingam K, et al. The FTO gene rs9939609 obesity-risk allele and loss of control over eating. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1483–1488. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tanofsky-Kraff M. Binge eating among children and adolescents. In: Jelalian E, Steele RG, editors. Handbook of Childhood and Adolescent Obesity. New York, NY: Springer US; 2009. pp. 43–59. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bauer F, Elbers CC, Adan RA, et al. Obesity genes identified in genome-wide association studies are associated with adiposity measures and potentially with nutrient-specific food preference. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(4):951–959. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matise TC, Ambite JL, Buyske S, et al. The Next PAGE in understanding complex traits: design for the analysis of Population Architecture Using Genetics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(7):849–859. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McQuillan GM, Pan Q, Porter KS. Consent for genetic research in a general population: an update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience. Genet Med. 2006;8(6):354–360. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000223552.70393.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) stored biologic specimens: guidelines for proposals to use samples and proposed cost schedule. Fed Regist. 2008;73:51487–51489. [Google Scholar]
- 28.The ARIC Investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Community (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(4):687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(4):346–357. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire (or Examination Protocol, or Laboratory Protocol), NHANES III. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nh3data.htm. (Accessed February 15, 2012) [Google Scholar]
- 31.Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(1):51–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994;32:1–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Human Nutrition Information Service, US Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 10. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Agriculture; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(23):9362–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903103106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dumitrescu L, Carty CL, Taylor K, et al. Genetic determinants of lipid traits in diverse populations from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–891. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fesinmeyer MD, North KE, Ritchie MD, et al. Genetic risk factors for body mass index and obesity in an ethnically diverse population: results from the Population Architecture Using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study. Obesity. doi: 10.1002/oby.20268. 2013;21(4):835–846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, et al. A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science. 2007;316(5826):889–894. doi: 10.1126/science.1141634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peng S, Zhu Y, Xu F, et al. FTO gene polymorphisms and obesity risk: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2011;9(1):E71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Church C, Moir L, McMurray F, et al. Overexpression of Fto leads to increased food intake and results in obesity. Nat Genet. 2010;42(12):1086–1092. doi: 10.1038/ng.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fredriksson R, Hägglund M, Olszewski PK, et al. The obesity gene, FTO, is of ancient origin, up-regulated during food deprivation and expressed in neurons of feeding-related nuclei of the brain. Endocrinology. 2008;149(5):2062–2071. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tung YC, Ayuso E, Shan X, et al. Hypothalamic-specific manipulation of Fto, the ortholog of the human obesity gene FTO, affects food intake in rats. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stratigopoulos G, Padilla SL, LeDuc CA, et al. Regulation of Fto/Ftm gene expression in mice and humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294(4):R1185–R1196. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00839.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gerken T, Girard CA, Tung YC, et al. The obesity-associated FTO gene encodes a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase. Science. 2007;318(5855):1469–1472. doi: 10.1126/science.1151710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Olszewski PK, Fredriksson R, Olszewska AM, et al. Hypothalamic FTO is associated with the regulation of energy intake not feeding reward. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:E129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Terra X, Auguet T, Porras JA, et al. Anti-inflammatory profile of FTO gene expression in adipose tissues from morbidly obese women. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2010;26(6):1041–1050. doi: 10.1159/000323979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu G, Zhu H, Lagou V, et al. FTO variant rs9939609 is associated with body mass index and waist circumference, but not with energy intake or physical activity in European- and African-American youth. BMC Med Genet. 2010;11(1):E57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lappalainen T, Lindstrom J, Paananen J, et al. Association of the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene variant (rs9939609) with dietary intake in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(10):1859–1865. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511007410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Corella D, Arnett DK, Tucker KL, et al. A high intake of saturated fatty acids strengthens the association between the fat mass and obesity-associated gene and BMI. J Nutr. 2011;141(12):2219–2225. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.143826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Willer CJ, Speliotes EK, Loos RJ, et al. Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat Genet. 2009;41(1):25–34. doi: 10.1038/ng.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson DF, et al. Genome-wide association yields new sequence variants at seven loci that associate with measures of obesity. Nat Genet. 2009;41(1):18–24. doi: 10.1038/ng.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nicklas TA, O'Neil CE, Mendoza J, et al. Are energy dense diets also nutrient dense? J Am Coll Nutr. 2008;27(5):553–560. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kennedy ET, Bowman SA, Spence JT, et al. Popular diets: correlation to health, nutrition, and obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(4):411–420. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00108-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kipnis V, Subar AF, Midthune D, et al. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(1):14–21. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Prentice AM, Black AE, Coward WA, et al. High levels of energy expenditure in obese women. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;292(6526):983–987. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6526.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, et al. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):795–804. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Heitmann BL, Lissner L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals—is it specific or non-specific? BMJ. 1995;311(7011):986–989. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.