Abstract
Quantitative measurement of blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability using MRI and its application to cerebral ischemia are reviewed. Measurement of BBB permeability using MRI has been employed to evaluate ischemic damage during acute and subacute phases of stroke and to predict hemorrhagic transformation. There is also an emerging interest on the development and use of MRI to monitor vascular structural changes and angiogenesis during stroke recovery. In this review, we describe MRI BBB permeability and susceptibility-weighted MRI measurements and its applications to evaluate ischemic damage during the acute and subacute phases of stroke and vascular remodeling during stroke recovery.
Keywords: Blood–brain barrier permeability, Blood-to-brain transfer constant, Hemorrhage, Angiogenesis, Vascular remodeling, Ischemia, Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, MRI
Introduction
The capillary endothelium plus the basal lamina, the pericytes enclosed within the basal lamina, and the surrounding cuff of astrocytic foot processes form the blood–brain barrier (BBB) complex. This barrier reduces the passive movement of water and restricts water-soluble materials from crossing the BBB, thereby protecting brain cells from exposure to neurotoxins and other unwanted neuroactive blood-borne agents.
BBB leakage after cerebral ischemic damage is present during the acute and subacute phases of ischemic damage [1–8] and during the early stage of angiogenesis associated with stroke recovery [9, 10]. BBB disruption during the acute and subacute stages post-stroke contributes to tissue damage and drives cerebral edema and intraparenchymal hemorrhage [1–8]. The BBB leakage at the early stage of angiogenesis during stroke recovery as an expression of vascular remodeling is a relatively new area of interest, requiring further investigation [9, 10].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a major role in the management of the patient after stroke [11]; among many other uses, MRI has been employed to evaluate BBB integrity via a measurement of the leakage rate of an intravascular contrast agent. BBB leakage can be quantitated by measurement of the blood-to-brain transfer constant (Ktrans) as,
(1) |
where F is the plasma flow and E is the extraction fraction (Fig. 1). E, in turn, is related to the permeability-surface area (PS) product of the local capillary network to the indicator via the expression,
(2) |
where F is the plasma flow. Using classical tracer kinetic theory, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI permits quantitative evaluation of the leakage of contrast agents across the BBB [12–14], most frequently via the blood-to-brain transfer constant, Ktrans, of gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA).
Fig. 1.
Vascular parameters of tracer transport and exchange in the damaged tissue. Flow plasma flow, Fp; shunt flow where there is no exchange of waste or nutrients with the tissue, perfusion nutritive flow, PS permeability-surface area product, E extracted fraction, VD* volume of distribution—not all of the tissue volume is “available” to the extracted tracer (in the case of Gd-DTPA, this represents the interstitial volume, Ve). Modified from ref. [133]
Recently, high-resolution susceptibility-weighted MRI (SWI) has been used to provide complementary information to Ktrans for detecting hemorrhage and angiogenesis after stroke. We will also review the application of SWI in staging hemorrhage and angiogenesis after stroke. In this review, we focus on MRI methodologies of BBB measurements and its applications during the acute and subacute phases of ischemic damage, and at the early stage of angiogenesis during stroke recovery.
MRI methodologies employed to evaluate BBB leakage
MRI with gadolinium-based contrast media has been employed to characterize pathophysiological changes during stroke due to its ability to accentuate the underlying flow variations and to aid in visualization by vascular and/or parenchymal contrast enhancement due to BBB leakage of the contrast agent [15–17]. Quantitative evaluation of BBB leakage is based on one of two tracer kinetic models, either the single-capillary model first proposed by Renkin [13] or the Johnson–Wilson tissue homogeneity model [14, 18]. In MRI, because the tissue homogeneity model requires a higher degree of signal-to-noise and higher sampling rates than the single-capillary model, the single-capillary model is almost universally employed, but perhaps with modifications for water exchange across compartmental boundaries, as in the shutter-speed model. The single-capillary kinetic modeling of contrast agent distribution has a basis in the simple rate equation describing diffusive flux across a permeable membrane [13]. This is determined by the differences in concentration between two compartments that are separated by a membrane and by the membrane’s permeability. For the case of transport across the capillary wall, the flux is equal to PS (Cp−Ce), where Cp and Ce are the concentrations of contrast agent in the plasma and interstitial spaces, respectively.
It is easily understood that the plasma concentration (and therefore capillary–tissue exchange) is dependent upon delivery of the indicator to the microvascular bed, i.e., upon flow. As indicated in Eq. 2, the extraction fraction, E, is the relative difference between arterial and venous concentrations of contrast agent and is defined as the fractional reduction of contrast agent in the plasma during its passage through the tissue [13]; as indicated in Eq. 1, E is the blood-to-brain transfer constant, Ktrans divided flow [19]. Unless flow is independently determined, MRI-DCE using T1-weighted dynamic contrast cannot be performed quickly enough to estimate flow, and Ktrans becomes the major summary parameter of vascular permeability.
In order to produce an absolute measure of Ktrans, an estimate of its concentration-time curve in tissue, C(t), and arterial input function (AIF) must be generated. Although the relative change in signal intensity can sometimes be used to approximate these curves [20], in general, an estimate of the change in R1 (R1=1/T1) is required. This requirement in turn ordains that the dynamic imaging be accompanied by an estimate of baseline T1. The tracer kinetic model used in most MRI studies to date is the modified single-capillary model described by Larsson and Tofts [21, 22]. A major limitation of such one-compartment models is the difficulty in interpreting the parameter Ktrans. If the single compartment reflects the interstitial volume, ve, alone (i.e., the vascular signal is negligible) and plasma flow, F»PS, the so-called permeability limited regime, then Ktrans reflects PS. Conversely, if PS»F (the capillary wall presents almost no barrier to the contrast agent), then Ktrans reflects F, and the distribution volume is the sum of ve and vascular volume, vp. If the contribution to the signal from contrast agent in the vp of the tissue is significant, then a multi-compartment model is needed. This has long been recognized in PET studies [23] and explicitly modeled in the popular Patlak approach to data analysis [24]. Also, a correction for efflux from the “irreversible” tissue compartment back into the blood is considered in a later modification by Patlak and Blasberg [25]. The Patlak model and graphical methods [24, 25] along with simplified model assumptions have been used successful to analyze dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data and to evaluate Ktrans with and without considering efflux [26, 27]. However, quantitative measurement of Ktrans using DCE remains a challenge due the possible confound of the “shutter-speed effect” [28–30]. We have demonstrated [31–33] that multipoint estimates of R1 using a Look–Locker sequence [34] do not demonstrate the serious nonlinearities that are attributed to the faster DCE sequences employing a short TR with highly saturated signals. Our data using the Look–Locker R1 data acquisition [34] and Patlak plots to analyze the MRI data were confirmed by comparison of Ktrans estimates obtained with quantitative autoradiography in the same animals [26, 31, 32, 35]. The Look–Locker R1 data acquisition with Patlak data analysis provides an accurate estimate of Ktrans in most cases of stroke [36–40]. However, these studies showed only moderate rates of leakage. The techniques employed could become biased in the case of a very severe BBB leakage due to the relatively slow rate of data acquisition.
The future direction in the quantitative measurements of BBB leakage will focus on minimizing errors from current methodologies, including more accurate estimate of the AIF, the influence of blood hematocrit, variation of the density of the tissues, water exchange between the various tissue compartments, and the tissue-specific relaxivity of an MRI contrast agent, as well as new methodologies to estimate flow and PS product simultaneously.
SWI uses fully velocity-compensated, radio frequency-spoiled, high-resolution 3D gradient echo scans and incorporates phase information to provide high sensitivity in detecting deoxygenated blood [39, 41–43]. While both phase and amplitude information are present in every MR image acquisition, phase information is generally discarded. It should be noted, however, that the phase information is strongly dependent on local variations in susceptibility, such as caused by deoxygenated blood. Thus, in the MRI experiment, small changes in the concentration of deoxyhemoglobin will be sensitively reflected in the phase of the local magnetization vector as it evolves. This sensitivity is utilized in SWI to form images of very small venous vascular features or hemorrhage [39, 42, 44–46].
Application to acute ischemic damage
A number of studies with various animal models of cerebral ischemia indicate that the BBB opens several hours after occluding a supplying artery. After 4 h of permanent occlusion, the influx of α-aminoisobutyric acid (AIB) and urea (both low molecular weight markers of BBB opening) increases, and leakage of albumin and horseradish peroxidase begins [1–5]. After 1–3 h of transient MCA occlusion and 2–3 h of reperfusion, the BBB opens to AIB and sucrose [47–49], but this opening may reverse temporarily several hours later [49]. Following similar occlusion times, BBB penetration of Evans blue-tagged albumin (EBA) was observed after 2–6 h of reperfusion and appeared to be dependent on rate of tissue perfusion and brain region [50, 51]; BBB opening to EBA may also be biphasic [50]. In these studies, vasogenic edema appeared to accompany the leakage of EBA. As for briefer periods of ischemia, 10–30 min of arterial occlusion plus reperfusion led to BBB opening to 3H inulin and 14C-sucrose after 3–6 h of reperfusion [52, 53] and was, thus, somewhat later than with 1–3 h of occlusion. Blood–brain barrier opening and vasogenic edema exacerbate ischemic injury and may contribute to reperfusion injury [49, 54, 55].
BBB disruption may also lead to hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in many affected subjects. HT of an ischemic brain is common in stroke patients, occurring in up to 70% of cases [56]. However, it has only been with the advent of sensitive imaging techniques, performed at prescribed times after stroke onset, that the true incidence of HT is becoming clear. Interest in HT after ischemic stroke has been heightened by the introduction of reperfusion strategies designed to remove the occluding clot and reestablish cerebral blood flow. All of the reperfusion strategies proven to be effective in improving functional outcome after ischemic stroke have been associated with an increased risk of HT, which is sometimes fatal [57–59]. Currently, diagnosis of hemorrhage is the domain of computed tomography (CT) rather than MRI, especially in acute stroke [60–62]. However, diagnosis of symptomatic hemorrhage using CT is only 57% efficient [63], and while CT can diagnose hemorrhage once it has occurred, it cannot predict hemorrhage unless high-dose contrast-enhanced CT is used [64, 65]. Magnetic resonance imaging, however, has demonstrated excellent predictive ability for hemorrhage [6, 8, 37]. The ability of MRI to sensitively detect and predict hemorrhage using a contrast agent, and magnetization transfer MRI may be related to early endothelial damage leading to increased permeability to small molecules (i.e., Gd-DTPA contrast agent or small proteins) across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [6, 8, 37]. These early studies using a contrast agent provide only indirect, technique-dependent information of permeability increases associated with BBB damage [6, 8]. Later investigation using quantitative MRI BBB measurement has demonstrated that BBB transfer constant, Ktrans, of the MRI contrast agent is the most sensitive early (2 to 3 h) predictor of the cerebral tissue that will progress to fibrin leakage [37].
MRI can not only predict HT based on endothelial cell damage and the ensuing severe disruption of the BBB but can also identify hemorrhage after it forms, based on changes in the signal induced by magnetic susceptibility [66, 67]. During hemorrhage, hemoglobin gradually changes from the oxy-, deoxy- (ferrous), and met- (ferric) heme proteins found in erythrocytes to the iron (ferric) storage forms of ferritin and hemosiderin contained within phagocytes, depending on the stage of hemorrhage [66]. Traditional MRI images of T1, T2, proton density, and gradient echo sequences exhibit different patterns of hemorrhage at different stages of development [68–71]. However, traditional MRI based on signal intensity is not as sensitive, especially during the hyperacute stage of hemorrhage [61, 62, 66]. The deoxy- and met- heme proteins in erythrocytes and the iron storage forms of ferritin and hemosiderin in phagocytes are paramagnetic molecules that cause signal loss (darkening) in images due to magnetic susceptibility, best seen on susceptibility-weighted T2* images [66, 72]. Susceptibility-weighted T2* MRI can sensitively detect hemorrhage even in the hyperacute stage [72, 73]. Thus, SWI exhibits high sensitivity in detecting hemorrhage, even to microscopic bleeds [39, 42]. Signals from substances with different susceptibilities (such as hemorrhage) will cause phase differences with adjacent tissues [39, 42]. Hemorrhage can be identified on the processed images, which combine magnitude and phase information to maximize the negative signal intensities of the regions containing degraded hemoglobin [39, 42]. By combining MRI SWI and BBB permeability measurements, we can obtain information about the stage and extent of hemorrhage transformation.
Quantitative determination of BBB damage and early prediction of HT during the hyperacute stage of ischemic damage are important to the acute management of stroke. Advances in MRI quantitative BBB measurements have improved its reliability for early prediction and identification of HT and determination of acute ischemic damage. Implementing these approaches in patients will provide new opportunities for better management of acute treatment of stroke.
Application to stroke recovery
The traditional application and development of MRI in stroke have been primarily focused on its acute management, i.e., focused on staging of ischemic damaged tissue, especially identification of reversibly damaged ischemic tissue such as penumbra, with the goal of extending the treatment window, and early detection and prediction of ischemic damage [74–79]. However, only a small percentage of stroke patients can be accessed and treated within the thrombolytic treatment window of 4.5 h [80], even with assistance from advanced neuroimaging tools. It is important to have alternate treatment strategies, particularly restorative therapies, with a less restrictive therapeutic window that can be applied to a large population of stroke patients, and concomitantly to develop advanced neuroimaging methodologies to monitor stroke recovery.
Studies in laboratory animals suggest that cell-based or pharmacological-based neurorestorative treatments can enhance brain reorganization and substantially improve functional recovery, even if treatment is initiated up to weeks after stroke [81–87]. Neurorestorative treatments amplify endogenous processes of brain plasticity, including angiogenesis and neuronal remodeling through neurogenesis and axonal reorganization, which likely contribute to improvement in neurologic function after stroke [81, 88–90]. Current understanding of angiogenesis, neuronal remodeling, and the interaction between angiogenesis and neuronal remodeling after stroke, however, has been derived mainly from regional measurements of stained cerebral tissue sections using histological and immunohistological methods [91–102]. These techniques do not allow dynamic assessment of tissue remodeling and permit only one measurement per experimental animal. MRI has been used as a modality complementary to postmortem studies to noninvasively monitor functional recovery and tissue remodeling after stroke [9, 89, 103]. More recent developments, especially neurorestorative treatment of preclinical models of stroke, have demonstrated that neurological outcome is correlated to vascular and neuronal remodeling, processes that can be monitored by MRI [9, 89]. Because the MRI measurement is noninvasive, MRI indices of vascular and neuronal remodeling related to neurological outcome demonstrated in preclinical stroke study can be translated to the clinic.
It is likely that vascular remodeling contributes to neurological recovery post-stroke [9, 10, 83, 90, 104–106]. Higher cerebral blood vessel density predicts improved outcome and survival in stroke patients [104, 107]. Neurological improvement is stimulated by neurorestorative treatments after stroke induces angiogenesis [81]. Treatment of stroke in rats with neurorestorative therapy increases levels of rat vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [83, 108–111], which consequently enhances angiogenesis and reduces functional deficits [81, 90, 112]. The expression of VEGF promotes vascular remodeling and induces angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, primarily in the boundary zone of the ischemic lesion. These newly formed vessels are important for tissue perfusion, but most likely their benefit derives from the factors expressed by angiogenic and newly formed vessels, such as BDNF, VEGF, VEGFR2, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), such as MMP 2 and MMP 9 [113, 114]. Based on histopathological investigation of angiogenesis after stroke, MRI methodologies have been developed and implemented to monitor the spatial and temporal evolution of vascular remodeling [9, 10, 39].
Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis are complex processes by which new capillaries form by sprouting from preexisting vessels or de novo, respectively [115]. These newly formed cerebral vessels are inherently leaky; it can take several weeks to form a functional BBB [116]. An early approach in detecting angiogenesis by MRI was to monitor changes in blood volume which, with time, may reflect the growth of new blood vessels [117–120]. A significant correlation was found between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI blood volume measurements and histological determination of microvessel density in angiogenic hot spots [117–120]. Elevated cerebral blood volume (CBV) correlates with increased vascular density in patients with glioma [121]. However, an inherent flaw in the correlation of CBV with vascular remodeling may arise from increased vessel diameter, resulting in an increased blood volume fraction that does not necessarily reflect increased number of vessels as determined by mean vascular density [121].
A link between angiogenesis and vascular permeability has been established through the work of Dvorak on VEGF [122]. Upon activation of VEGF receptors by VEGF, microvessels become hyperpermeable to plasma proteins and other circulating macromolecules. Such hyperpermeability was found to accompany angiogenesis in tumors, healing wounds, retinopathies, inflammatory conditions, and physiological ovarian angiogenesis [121]. Quantitative evaluation of the leakage of contrast across the BBB has been applied to reproducibly measure vascular permeability in cancer patients [123]. MRI CBV, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and Ktrans have also been employed to measure angiogenesis after stroke [9, 39]. MRI in combination with 3D laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) images of neural progenitor cell therapy of stroke in rat shows enhanced angiogenesis in ischemic boundary regions after cell-based treatment, confirmed by an increase in vascular density and the appearance of large thin-walled mother vessels in LSCM [9]. The enhanced angiogenesis was coincident with increases of CBF and CBV at 6 weeks after treatment, and also coincident with transient increases of blood-to-brain transfer constant (Ktrans) of Gd-DTPA with a peak at 1 to 3 weeks after cell therapy [9, 124]. Compared to early BBB leakage in the angiogenic areas after neurorestorative treatment, the non-treated stroked animals exhibited a delayed BBB leakage (2 to 5 weeks) in the angiogenic areas (Fig. 2) [39]. Previous investigations also reported that new microvessel formation started from 12 h up to 21 days or longer in a peri-infarcted area [125–128]. The Ktrans and other MRI measurements, along with advanced analysis using iterative self-organizing data, identify the location and area of vascular remodeling and angiogenesis [9, 129]. Ktrans is a sensitive parameter to detect early stage of angiogenesis, based on similar mechanisms of angiogenesis in tumor. However, a tumor exhibits a constant increase in Ktrans due to the continuous growth of new vessels, while a transient increase in Ktrans, with a short time window, is demonstrated after restorative treatment of stroke [9]. Thus, the sensitivity of Ktrans to detect angiogenesis is time dependent during stroke recovery.
Fig. 2.
Angiogenesis appearances in MRI Ktrans and SWI after stroke with and without treatment: Ktrans maps (a, b) and SWI (c, d) images exhibited early increases in Ktrans (b, red arrow) and the dark lines in SWI (d, white arrowhead) in the angiogenesis related areas for the treated compared to the control rat (a, c)
In addition to Ktrans, SWI also provides high sensitivity in detecting angiogenesis [39, 41]. Because angiogenesis typically occurs in regions of high oxygen extraction, SWI will generate early images of small draining veins in peri-infarct regions that are likely to promote angiogenesis. This deoxyhemoglobin can also be detected by T2* maps [39]. A combination of SWI, T2*, and Ktrans may therefore provide information about the stage of angiogenesis [39, 41].
Although Ktrans measurement is applied to clinical tumor patients [12, 130], there are few applications of Ktrans measurement in stroke patients [131, 132]. This may be attributed to an under appreciation of the importance of the Ktrans measurement and the need for an additional injection of contrast agent other than that for perfusion. Perfusion is an important measurement in clinical stroke patient study. Therefore, Ktrans measurement can be performed by either eliminating perfusion or using a dose of contrast agent in two separate injections. However, arterial spin labeling CBF measurement becomes available in more clinical MRI scanner and could be an ideal combination with Ktrans measurement for monitoring vascular remodeling after stroke.
We have reviewed MRI methodologies used in the evaluation of BBB leakage and its applications in both the acute and recovery phase after cerebral ischemic damage. Although the available MRI measurements of BBB leakage have demonstrated a great potential in the management of patient treatment, these techniques need to be further developed to increase the accuracy of the measurements and to provide information from both flow and permeability with a single MRI contrast agent injection. The application of MRI measurements of BBB leakage during both the acute phase of stroke and stroke recovery may also need to be combined with other measurements to provide staging information of ischemic and hemorrhagic damage as well as stroke recovery. Since the noninvasive nature of MRI permits translation of MRI methods from animals to patients, validation of MRI techniques for studying prediction of ischemic damage and hemorrhage as well as therapy-induced stroke recovery could lead to optimization of treatment protocols and improved management of stroke.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants RO1 NS064134, RO1 NS48349, RO1 NS38292, RO1 NS43324, RO1 HL64766, R01 CA135329-01, RO1 AG037506, and P50 NS23393.
References
- 1.Ennis SR, Keep RF, Schielke GP, Betz AL. Decrease in perfusion of cerebral capillaries during incomplete ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10(2):213–220. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martz D, Beer M, Betz AL. Dimethylthiourea reduces ischemic brain edema without affecting cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10(3):352–357. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Menzies SA, Betz AL, Hoff JT. Contributions of ions and albumin to the formation and resolution of ischemic brain edema. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(2):257–266. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Betz AL, Keep RF, Beer ME, Ren XD. Blood–brain barrier permeability and brain concentration of sodium, potassium, and chloride during focal ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14(1):29–37. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garcia JH, Liu KF, Yoshida Y, Chen S, Lian J. Brain microvessels: factors altering their patency after the occlusion of a middle cerebral artery (Wistar rat) Am J Pathol. 1994;145(3):728–740. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knight RA, Barker PB, Fagan SC, Li Y, Jacobs MA, Welch KM. Prediction of impending hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke using magnetic resonance imaging in rats. Stroke. 1998;29(1):144–151. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang Q, Ewing JR, Zhang ZG, Zhang RL, Hu J, Divine GW, et al. Magnetization transfer MRI: application to treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(2):178–184. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<178::aid-jmri1027>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jiang Q, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Knight RA, Ewing JR, Ding G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of hemorrhagic transformation of embolic stroke in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22(5):559–568. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200205000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang Q, Zhang ZG, Ding GL, Zhang L, Ewing JR, Wang L, et al. Investigation of neural progenitor cell induced angiogenesis after embolic stroke in rat using MRI. NeuroImage. 2005;28:698–707. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang Q, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. MRI of stroke recovery. Stroke. 2010;41:410–414. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wintermark M, Albers GW, Alexandrov AV, Alger JR, Bammer R, Baron JC, et al. Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke. 2008;39(5):1621–1628. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223–232. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::aid-jmri2>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol. 1959;197:1205–1210. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.6.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crone C. The permeability of capillaries in various organs as determined by use of the ‘indicator diffusion’ method. Acta Physiol Scand. 1963;58:292–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Merten CL, Knitelius HO, Assheuer J, Bergmann-Kurz B, Hedde JP, Bewermeyer H. MRI of acute cerebral infarcts, increased contrast enhancement with continuous infusion of gadolinium. Neuroradiology. 1999;41(4):242–248. doi: 10.1007/s002340050740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niendorf HP, Felix R, Laniado M, Schorner W, Claussen C, Weinmann HJ. Gadolinium-DTPA: a new contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Radiat Med. 1985;3(1):7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(3):619–624. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.3.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Johnson JA, Wilson TA. A model for capillary exchange. Am J Physiol. 1966;210(6):1299–1303. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.6.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lassen NA, Perl W. Tracer kinetic methods in medical physiology. 1st ed. New York: Raven; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Padhani AR, Hayes C, Landau S, Leach MO. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(2):143–153. doi: 10.1002/nbm.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Larsson HB, Stubgaard M, Frederiksen JL, Jensen M, Henriksen O, Paulson OB. Quantitation of blood–brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 1990;16(1):117–131. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910160111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood–brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17(2):357–367. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910170208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gambhir SS, Huang SC, Hawkins RA, Phelps ME. A study of the single compartment tracer kinetic model for the measurement of local cerebral blood flow using 15O-water and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1987;7(1):13–20. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1987.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3(1):1–7. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Patlak CS, Blasberg RG. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5(4):584–590. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ewing JR, Knight RA, Nagaraja TN, Yee JS, Nagesh V, Whitton P, et al. Patlak plots of Gd-DTPA MRI data yield blood-brain transfer constants concordant with those of 14 C-sucrose in areas of blood–brain opening. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(2):283–292. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ewing JR, Brown SL, Lu M, Panda S, Ding G, Knight RA, et al. Model selection in magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability: gadomer in a 9 L model of rat cerebral tumor. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:310–320. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Quirk JD, Bretthorst GL, Duong TQ, Snyder AZ, Springer CS, Jr, Ackerman JJ, et al. Equilibrium water exchange between the intra- and extracellular spaces of mammalian brain. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(3):493–499. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Li X, Springer Jr CS. Variation of the relaxographic “shutter-speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(6):1151–1169. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, Molina PE, Palyka I, Vetek G, et al. Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42(3):467–478. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199909)42:3<467::aid-mrm9>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Paudyal R, Bagher-Ebadian H, Nagaraja TN, Fenstermacher JD, Ewing JR. Modeling of Look–Locker estimates of the magnetic resonance imaging estimate of longitudinal relaxation rate in tissue after contrast administration. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(5):1432–1444. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Paudyal R, Ewing JR, Nagaraja TN, Bagher-Ebadian H, Knight RA, Panda S, et al. The concordance of MRI and quantitative autoradiography estimates of the transvascular transfer rate constant of albumin in a rat brain tumor model. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(5):1422–1431. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ewing JR, Brown SL, Nagaraja TN, Bagher-Ebadian H, Paudyal R, Panda S, et al. MRI measurement of change in vascular parameters in the 9 L rat cerebral tumor after dexamethasone administration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(6):1430–1438. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Look DC, Locker DR. Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum. 1970;41(2):250–251. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Knight RA, Karki K, Ewing JR, Divine GW, Fenstermacher JD, Patlak CS, et al. Estimating blood and brain concentrations and blood-to-brain influx by magnetic resonance imaging with step-down infusion of Gd-DTPA in focal transient cerebral ischemia and confirmation by quantitative autoradiography with Gd-[(14)C]DTPA. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29(5):1048–1058. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jiang Q, Ewing J, Zhang Z, Arniego P, Zhang L, Ding G, et al. Quantitative permeability measurements of hemorrhagic transformation in embolic stroke using MRI. Proc X Annu Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 2002;1224 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jiang Q, Ewing JR, Ding GL, Zhang L, Zhang ZG, Li L, et al. Quantitative evaluation of BBB permeability after embolic stroke in rat using MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25(5):583–592. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ding G, Jiang Q, Li L, Zhang L, Gang Zhang Z, Ledbetter KA, et al. Detection of BBB disruption and hemorrhage by Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI after embolic stroke in rat. Brain Res. 2006;1114(1):195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ding G, Jiang Q, Li L, Zhang L, Zhang ZG, Ledbetter KA, et al. Angiogenesis detected after embolic stroke in rat brain using magnetic resonance T2*WI. Stroke. 2008;39(5):1563–1568. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nagaraja TN, Knight RA, Ewing JR, Karki K, Nagesh V, Fenstermacher JD. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and repeated measurements of blood–brain barrier permeability to contrast agents. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;686:193–212. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-938-3_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jiang Q, Gollapalli L, Haacke EM, Ding GL, Zhang ZG, Zhang L, et al. Susceptibility weighted MRI for detection and staging of angiogenesis after stroke in rats. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2008; Toronto, Canada. 2008. p. 304. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, Shutter LA, Herigault G, Haacke EM, et al. Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results. Radiology. 2003;227(2):332–339. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, Tong KA, Wycliffe N, Kido DK, et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(4):439–450. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rauscher A, Sedlacik J, Barth M, Mentzel HJ, Reichenbach JR. Magnetic susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging of the human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(4):736–742. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM, Klarhofer M, Kaiser WA, Moser E. High-resolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(6):949–957. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200011000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Haacke ME, Herigault G, Yu Y, Kido D, Tong K, Obenaus A, et al. Observing tumor vascularity noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging. Image Anal Stereol. 2002;21:107–113. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang GY, Betz AL. Reperfusion-induced injury to the blood– brain barrier after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke. 1994;25(8):1658–1664. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.8.1658. discussion 64–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Picozzi P, Todd NV, Crockard HA. Regional blood–brain barrier permeability changes after restoration of blood flow in postischemic gerbil brains: a quantitative study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5(1):10–16. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rosenberg GA, Estrada EY, Dencoff JE. Matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs are associated with blood–brain barrier opening after reperfusion in rat brain. Stroke. 1998;29(10):2189–2195. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kuroiwa T, Ting P, Martinez H, Klatzo I. The biphasic opening of the blood–brain barrier to proteins following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion. Acta Neuropathol. 1985;68(2):122–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00688633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Belayev L, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD. Quantitative evaluation of blood–brain barrier permeability following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 1996;739(1–2):88–96. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00815-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Preston E, Foster DO. Evidence for pore-like opening of the blood–brain barrier following forebrain ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 1997;761(1):4–10. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00323-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yoshizumi H, Fujibayashi Y, Kikuchi H. A new approach to the integrity of dual blood–brain barrier functions of global ischemic rats. Barrier and carrier functions. Stroke. 1993;24(2):279–284. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.2.279. discussion 84–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aronowski J, Strong R, Grotta JC. Reperfusion injury: demonstration of brain damage produced by reperfusion after transient focal ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17(10):1048–1056. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199710000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Murakami K, Kawase M, Kondo T, Chan PH. Cellular accumulation of extravasated serum protein and DNA fragmentation following vasogenic edema. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(10):825–835. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lodder J, Krijne-Kubat B, Broekman J. Cerebral hemorrhagic infarction at autopsy: cardiac embolic cause and the relationship to the cause of death. Stroke. 1986;17(4):626–629. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.NINDS. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group: tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282(21):2003–2011. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.21.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pessin MS, Teal PA, Caplan LR. Hemorrhagic infarction: guilt by association? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(6):1123–1126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Higashida RT, Furlan AJ. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(8):e109–e137. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Higer HP, Pedrosa P, Schaeben W, Bielke G, Meindl S. Intracranial hemorrhage in MRT. Radiologe. 1989;29(6):297–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jansen O, Heiland S, Schellinger P. Neuroradiologic diagnosis in acute arterial cerebral infarct. Current status of new methods. Nervenarzt. 1998;69(6):465–471. doi: 10.1007/s001150050299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.NINDS. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1997;28(11):2109–2118. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.11.2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hayman LA, Evans RA, Bastion FO, Hinck VC. Delayed high dose contrast CT: identifying patients at risk of massive hemorrhagic infarction. AJR. 1981;136:1151–1159. doi: 10.2214/ajr.136.6.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Mayer T, Missler U, Droste DW, Bruckmann H. The relationship of hemorrhagic transformation, blood–brain barrier disturbance and neurological status in supratentorial infarction examined by MRI follow-up (abstract) Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996;6(suppl 2):151. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Atlas S, Thulborn K. Intracranial hemorrhage. In: Atlas SW, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 2002. pp. 773–832. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Thulborn K, Atlas S. Intracranial Hemorrhage. In: Atlas SW, editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. pp. 265–314. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hayman LA, Taber KH, Ford JJ, Bryan RN. Mechanisms of MR signal alteration by acute intracerebral blood: old concepts and new theories. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(5):899–907. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hayman LA, Pagani JJ, Kirkpatrick JB, Hinck VC. Pathophysiology of acute intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage: applications to MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(1):135–139. doi: 10.2214/ajr.153.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Weingarten K, Zimmerman RD, Cahill PT, Deck MD. Detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage on MR imaging: ineffectiveness of prolonged interecho interval pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(3):475–479. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bradley WG., Jr MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology. 1993;189(1):15–26. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Patel MR, Edelman RR, Warach S. Detection of hyperacute primary intraparenchymal hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 1996;27(12):2321–2324. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.12.2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Linfante I, Llinas RH, Caplan LR, Warach S. MRI features of intracerebral hemorrhage within 2 hours from symptom onset. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2263–2267. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.11.2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Welch KM, Windham J, Knight RA, Nagesh V, Hugg JW, Jacobs M, et al. A model to predict the histopathology of human stroke using diffusion and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [see comments] Stroke. 1995;26(11):1983–1989. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.11.1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jiang Q, Chopp M, Zhang ZG, Knight RA, Jacobs M, Windham JP, et al. The temporal evolution of MRI tissue signatures after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00286-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jacobs MA, Zhang ZG, Knight RA, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Goussev AV, Peck DJ, et al. A model for multiparametric mri tissue characterization in experimental cerebral ischemia with histological validation in rat: part 1. Stroke. 2001;32(4):943–949. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.4.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wu O, Christensen S, Hjort N, Dijkhuizen RM, Kucinski T, Fiehler J, et al. Characterizing physiological heterogeneity of infarction risk in acute human ischaemic stroke using MRI. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 9):2384–2393. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Karonen JO, Vanninen RL, Liu Y, Ostergaard L, Kuikka JT, Nuutinen J, et al. Combined diffusion and perfusion MRI with correlation to single-photon emission CT in acute ischemic stroke. Ischemic penumbra predicts infarct growth. Stroke. 1999;30(8):1583–1590. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.8.1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Albers GW. Expanding the window for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke. The potential role of acute MRI for patient selection. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2230–2237. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–1329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chopp M, Li Y. Treatment of neural injury with marrow stromal cells. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:92–100. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wang L, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang R, Chopp M. Treatment of stroke with erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis and improves neurological function in rats. Stroke. 2004;35(7):1732–1737. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000132196.49028.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhang R, Wang L, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhu Z, Zhang Z, et al. Nitric oxide enhances angiogenesis via the synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor and cGMP after stroke in the rat. Circ Res. 2003;92(3):308–313. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000056757.93432.8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chen J, Zhang ZG, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Jiang H, et al. Statins induce angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and synaptogenesis after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(6):743–751. doi: 10.1002/ana.10555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhang R, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Tsang W, Lu M, et al. Sildenafil (Viagra) induces neurogenesis and promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats. Stroke. 2002;33(11):2675–2680. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000034399.95249.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Yang HI, Tzeng YS, Pang CY, Yen PS, et al. Functional recovery of stroke rats induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-stimulated stem cells. Circulation. 2004;110(13):1847–1854. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000142616.07367.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jin K, Sun Y, Xie L, Childs J, Mao XO, Greenberg DA. Postischemic administration of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) reduces infarct size and modifies neurogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24(4):399–408. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200404000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Neurogenesis in the adult ischemic brain: generation, migration, survival, and restorative therapy. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(5):408–416. doi: 10.1177/1073858405278865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jiang Q, Zhang ZG, Ding GL, Silver B, Zhang L, Meng H, et al. MRI detects white matter reorganization after neural progenitor cell treatment of stroke. NeuroImage. 2006;32:1080–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Neurorestorative therapies for stroke: underlying mechanisms and translation to the clinic. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(5):491–500. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Auerbach JM, Eiden MV, McKay RD. Transplanted CNS stem cells form functional synapses in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(5):1696–1704. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chen J, Li Y, Chopp M. Intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow with BDNF after MCAo in rat. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5):711–716. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chen X, Li Y, Wang L, Katakowski M, Zhang L, Chen J, et al. Ischemic rat brain extracts induce human marrow stromal cell growth factor production. Neuropathology. 2002;22(4):275–279. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2002.00450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chen X, Katakowski M, Li Y, Lu D, Wang L, Zhang L, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cell cultures conditioned by traumatic brain tissue extracts: growth factor production. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69(5):687–691. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Li Y, Chen J, Chen XG, Wang L, Gautam SC, Xu YX, et al. Human marrow stromal cell therapy for stroke in rat: neurotrophins and functional recovery. Neurology. 2002;59(4):514–523. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.4.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhang R, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Lu M, Lapointe M, et al. A nitric oxide donor induces neurogenesis and reduces functional deficits after stroke in rats. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(5):602–611. doi: 10.1002/ana.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Li Y, Chen J, Wang L, Zhang L, Lu M, Chopp M. Intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2001;316(2):67–70. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02384-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Lu M, Zhang X, Chopp M. Therapeutic benefit of intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2001;189(1–2):49–57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00557-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Li Y, Chen J, Wang L, Lu M, Chopp M. Treatment of stroke in rat with intracarotid administration of marrow stromal cells. Neurology. 2001;56(12):1666–1672. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.12.1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang Z, Lu D, Lu M, et al. Therapeutic benefit of intravenous administration of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. 2001;32(4):1005–1011. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.4.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Li Y, Chopp M, Chen J, Wang L, Gautam SC, Xu YX, et al. Intrastriatal transplantation of bone marrow nonhematopoietic cells improves functional recovery after stroke in adult mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(9):1311–1319. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200009000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhang L, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Quantitative measurement of motor and somatosensory impairments after mild (30 min) and severe (2 h) transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2000;174(2):141–146. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00268-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Johansen-Berg H. Functional imaging of stroke recovery: what have we learnt and where do we go from here? Int J Stroke. 2007;2(1):7–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Krupinski J, Kaluza J, Kumar P, Kumar S, Wang JM. Role of angiogenesis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25(9):1794–1798. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.9.1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2518–2527. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJ, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;33(2):181–189. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Slevin M, Krupinski J, Slowik A, Kumar P, Szczudlik A, Gaffney J. Serial measurement of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta1 in serum of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1863–1870. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.8.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chen J, Zhang ZG, Li Y, Wang L, Xu YX, Gautam SC, et al. Intravenous administration of human bone marrow stromal cells induces angiogenesis in the ischemic boundary zone after stroke in rats. Circ Res. 2003;92(6):692–699. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000063425.51108.8D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Tsang W, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Morris D, Zhang R, et al. Correlation of VEGF and angiopoietin expression with disruption of blood–brain barrier and angiogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22(4):379–392. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200204000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zhang Z, Chopp M. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietins in focal cerebral ischemia. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002;12(2):62–66. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(01)00149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Jiang Q, Zhang R, Davies K, Powers C, et al. VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood–brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain. J Clin Invest. 2000;106(7):829–838. doi: 10.1172/JCI9369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chopp M, Zhang ZG, Jiang Q. Neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and MRI indices of functional recovery from stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(2 Suppl):827–831. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000250235.80253.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Teng H, Zhang ZG, Wang L, Zhang RL, Zhang L, Morris D, et al. Coupling of angiogenesis and neurogenesis in cultured endothelial cells and neural progenitor cells after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(4):764–771. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Wang L, Zhang ZG, Zhang RL, Gregg SR, Hozeska-Solgot A, LeTourneau Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 secreted by erythropoietin-activated endothelial cells promote neural progenitor cell migration. J Neurosci. 2006;26(22):5996–6003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5380-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Risau W. Development and differentiation of endothelium. Kidney Int Suppl. 1998;67:S3–S6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.06701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Risau W. Molecular biology of blood–brain barrier ontogenesis and function. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1994;60:109–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9334-1_28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Knopp MV, Weikel W, Brix G, Zuna I, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. Cancer Res. 1998;58(16):3598–3602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hawighorst H, Weikel W, Knapstein PG, Knopp MV, Zuna I, Schonberg SO, et al. Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(10):2305–2312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Brasch R, Turetschek K. MRI characterization of tumors and grading angiogenesis using macromolecular contrast media: status report. Eur J Radiol. 2000;34(3):148–155. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00195-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pathak AP, Schmainda KM, Ward BD, Linderman JR, Rebro KJ, Greene AS. MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(4):735–747. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Neeman M. Functional and molecular MR imaging of angiogenesis: seeing the target, seeing it work. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2002;39:11–17. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Dvorak HF, Nagy JA, Feng D, Brown LF, Dvorak AM. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and the significance of microvascular hyperpermeability in angiogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1999;237:97–132. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59953-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Jackson A, Jayson GC, Li KL, Zhu XP, Checkley DR, Tessier JJ, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(903):153–162. doi: 10.1259/bjr/70653746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Jiang Q, Chopp M. Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells participate in cerebral neovascularization after focal cerebral ischemia in the adult mouse. Circ Res. 2002;90(3):284–288. doi: 10.1161/hh0302.104460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Marti HJ, Bernaudin M, Bellail A, Schoch H, Euler M, Petit E, et al. Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression precedes neovascularization after cerebral ischemia. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(3):965–976. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64964-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hayashi T, Noshita N, Sugawara T, Chan PH. Temporal profile of angiogenesis and expression of related genes in the brain after ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23(2):166–180. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000041283.53351.CB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Slevin M, Kumar P, Gaffney J, Kumar S, Krupinski J. Can angiogenesis be exploited to improve stroke outcome? Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;111(3):171–183. doi: 10.1042/CS20060049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Yano A, Shingo T, Takeuchi A, Yasuhara T, Kobayashi K, Takahashi K, et al. Encapsulated vascular endothelial growth factor-secreting cell grafts have neuroprotective and angiogenic effects on focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(1):104–114. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.1.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Li L, Jiang Q, Zhang L, Ding G, Wang L, Zhang R, et al. Ischemic cerebral tissue response to subventricular zone cell transplantation measured by iterative self-organizing data analysis technique algorithm. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1366–1377. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kemper EM, Boogerd W, Thuis I, Beijnen JH, van Tellingen O. Modulation of the blood–brain barrier in oncology: therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of brain tumours? Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30(5):415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Vidarsson L, Thornhill RE, Liu F, Mikulis DJ, Kassner A. Quantitative permeability magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke: how long do we need to scan? Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(9):1216–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bang OY, Saver JL, Alger JR, Shah SH, Buck BH, Starkman S, et al. Patterns and predictors of blood–brain barrier permeability derangements in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(2):454–461. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Laking GR, West C, Buckley DL, Matthews J, Price PM. Imaging vascular physiology to monitor cancer treatment. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2006;58(2):95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]