Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Sep 6;124(5):1031–8.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.052

Gestational Diabetes, Atopic Dermatitis and Allergen Sensitization in Early Childhood

Rajesh Kumar 1, Fengxiu Ouyang 2, Rachel E Story 1, Jacqueline A Pongracic 1, Xiumei Hong 2, Guoying Wang 4, Colleen Pearson 3, Kathryn Ortiz 3, Howard Bauchner 3, Xiaobin Wang 2
PMCID: PMC3756674  NIHMSID: NIHMS144527  PMID: 19733904

Abstract

Background

The relationship between the prenatal environment, maternal-fetal interaction, and allergic disease in the offspring remains understudied.

Objective

We sought to determine whether gestational diabetes modifies the risk of early childhood atopic manifestations including atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization.

Methods

This study includes 680 children from the Boston Birth Cohort. Mother-child dyads were recruited at birth and followed prospectively to a mean age of 3.2±2.3 years with study visits aligned with the pediatric primary care schedule. The primary outcomes were physician diagnosed atopic dermatitis on standardized medical record abstraction and allergen sensitization based on Immunocap to 7 common foods and 5 common aeroallergens (sIgE≥0.10 kUA/L, Phadia). Gestational diabetes was determined by standardized medical record review. Logistic regression analysis, stratified by term/preterm status, evaluated the association of gestational diabetes with atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization respectively, controlling for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, fetal growth, and pertinent covariates.

Results

Of the 680 children, 488 were term and 192 were preterm (<37 weeks gestation). Overall, 4.9% of the mothers developed gestational diabetes. Among the 680 children, 34.4% developed atopic dermatitis and 51% developed allergen sensitization. In term births, gestational diabetes was significantly associated with atopic dermatitis (OR, 95%CI=7.2, 1.5-34.5) and allergen sensitization (OR, 95%CI=5.7, 1.2-28.0). Adjusting for fetal growth had little effect. The association with sensitization was driven primarily by food sensitization (OR, 95%CI=8.3, 1.6-43.3). The above associations were not observed in preterm births.

Conclusions

In term births, gestational diabetes increased the risk of atopic dermatitis and early childhood allergen sensitization, independent of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and fetal growth.

Keywords: atopic dermatitis, eczema, food allergen sensitization, gestational diabetes

Introduction

It has been suggested that alternative factors to the “hygiene hypothesis” may contribute to the allergy epidemic.1 As per the“Barker hypothesis”, prenatal maternal-fetal interactions and early life programming may have influences on disease later in life.2 Prenatal maternal-fetal interactions and early life programming may be associated with the development of asthma or allergic diseases.3-8 A number of studies suggest an association of childhood obesity with early manifestations of atopy such as sensitization.9,10 However, the associations of prenatal/early life factors associated with maternal obesity and prenatal metabolic factors with allergic manifestations in the child remain poorly understood.

Maternal obesity has become very common with a 20% prevalence in the US,11 and is associated with the development of gestational diabetes (GDM),12 and fetal macrosomia in the offspring.13 GDM and large for gestational age (LGA) have been associated with wheezing and asthma. 14-19 LGA has been associated with atopic sensitization, serum IgE,20-23 and atopic dermatitis.24, 25 Of these inter-related variables, GDM has not to date been associated with these early allergic manifestations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between GDM and early atopic manifestations such as atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization, accounting for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, fetal growth and other pertinent variables in the Boston Birth Cohort, a large, multi-ethnic, inner-city cohort. Since prematurity has effects on the immunologic system26-28 and seems to have variable associations with different atopic diseases,15, 29-31 we were conscientious to evaluate whether these associations vary by gestational age.

Methods

Patient Population

The Boston Birth Cohort was initiated in 1998 and recruitment is ongoing at the Boston University Medical Center (BMC). It is a multi-ethnic cohort (56% black, 11% white, and 20% Hispanic) which includes subjects from a range of socio-economic strata that includes inner-city poor up to middle class subjects.

The Boston Birth Cohort was originally designed to study adverse birth outcomes, particularly preterm birth. The inclusion criteria of the parent study are as follows: Any woman admitted to the Labor and Delivery floor at BMC who delivered a singleton live infant and met our case (gestational age <37 weeks or birth weight <2,500 grams) or control (gestational age >= 37 weeks with birth weight >=2,500 grams) criteria was eligible.32 The Children’s Memorial Hospital (CMH) Institutional Review Board (IRB), the BMC IRB, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approved the parent study protocol. Under a separate CMH and BMC IRB approved study protocol and consent process, all infants enrolled in the Boston Birth Cohort are eligible for the postnatal follow-up study to determine postnatal health outcomes as detailed below.

Data Collection and Measurements

Recruitment of the Birth Cohort

Mother-infant pairs were recruited 24 to 48 hours post-delivery. After obtaining signed written informed consent, we interviewed subjects using a standardized questionnaire. We also reviewed maternal and infant medical records using a standardized abstraction form to obtain clinical data including ultrasound findings, placental pathology reports, laboratory reports, pregnancy complications, labor and delivery course, and birth outcomes.

Postnatal Follow-up Study

Those individuals who sought care at the BMC for primary or specialist care were invited to participate in the postnatal follow-up study starting in 2004.28 After written informed consent was obtained from the biological mother, visits were scheduled at 6-12 mo, 2 yr, 4 yr, and 6 yr in alignment with the child’s pediatric primary care visit schedule. Mothers were interviewed using standardized postnatal health questionnaires. We also reviewed the study child’s medical record using a standard medical record abstraction form to obtain clinical data including type and date of visits, clinical diagnosis including ICD 9 codes, and growth parameters.

Determination of Gestational Diabetes

GDM was determined by standardized review of maternal pre- and perinatal medical records. All mothers in the cohort received care in the BMC labor and delivery ward. The availability of a unified electronic medical record with ICD9 coding of diagnoses provided information on maternal prenatal and peripartum conditions.

Assessment of Maternal BMI

Maternal BMI was calculated by pre-pregnancy weight and height obtained from the maternal postpartum questionnaire interview, and categorized into underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9) and obesity (≥30) according to standard WHO definitions.33

Assessment of Fetal Growth

Fetal growth was based on estimate of standardized birth weight. Standardized birth weight (SBWT) is defined as birth weight standardized by mean and variance in the stratum of corresponding ethnic group, sex, and gestational week in the reference population using approximately 15,000 births born at BMC during 1998-2003.34 Large for gestational age (LGA) was defined as SBWT >90th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Assessment of Gestational Age

Gestational age was assessed based on both the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) as recorded in the maternal medical record and early (<20 weeks) prenatal ultrasound. This approach has been used in large hospital-based preterm studies and in our ongoing funded preterm studies.

Outcome Measures

Given the mean age of our subjects, we chose physician diagnosed atopic dermatitis as the primary outcome, as determined by standardized abstraction of the medical record. We also examined allergen sensitization at each recent follow-up visit, with the data from the most recent follow-up visit (mean age 3.2 years) used for this analysis. Allergen sensitization was defined as having specific IgE>0.10 kUA/L (Immunocap, Phadia) to at least one of the tested allergens, including food (egg white, milk, peanut, soy, shrimp, wheat, and walnut) and aeroallergens (Dermatophygoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophygoides farinae, German cockroach, cat, dog, and Alternaria alternata).

Statistical Analyses

A total of 1,262 children from the Boston Birth Cohort completed at least one postnatal follow-up visit. For the purposes of this study, only children who had specific IgE data for both food and aeroallergens were included to avoid confounding from undetected sensitization (n=680). However, their characteristics did not differ from the children who were excluded (online table #1). Children were categorized into three groups: children without atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization (reference group), children with atopic dermatitis, and children with allergen sensitization. Of note, the outcome groups of atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization were not mutually exclusive because 146 children had both atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization.

To examine the association of GDM on atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis, stratified by preterm and term status (<37 weeks for preterm and ≥37 weeks for term). We also performed a joint analysis by categorizing participants into four groups by term status and presence of GDM (with term and no GDM as a common reference group) to examine the joint association of GDM and preterm delivery on atopic outcomes.

Aside from the key determinant variables, potential confounding variables included infant and maternal factors which were retained in the model based on significance or repeated associations in prior literature. Infant factors included child’s current age and sex, breastfeeding, antibiotics in the peripartum period, fetal growth, and type of delivery. Maternal factors included maternal ethnicity, family history (maternal and paternal) of atopic diseases, parity, socio-economic status (SES) as measured by highest level of maternal education achieved and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI. Of these covariates, delivery by cesarean section, maternal history of atopy, breastfeeding and SES (as determined by maternal education) were retained in the model despite lack of significance due to their prior associations with atopic disease in the literature.

Since maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, GDM, and fetal growth are inter-related variables, we included maternal pregnancy BMI (with normal BMI as the reference group) in the main model and added fetal growth in a secondary model respectively to determine if the effect of GDM on atopic phenotypes was independent of these factors.

As a secondary analysis, we carried out a nominal regression model to evaluate the effects of GDM on the outcomes of neither atopic dermatitis or sensitization, atopic dermatitis only, sensitization only, and the combined group with both sensitization and atopic dermatitis.

All analyses were carried out using statistical software SAS for Windows 8.20 (SAS Institute, NC).

Results

Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort

When we examine the mother-infant dyads in the entire cohort (n=1,262), this is a predominantly low income, minority population. Most (60.1%, n=759) mothers were African American, and 21.1% (n= 266) were Latino. The majority (81.4 %, n= 639) of mothers had an annual household income of <$30,000. The mean age of children at follow up was 3.1 (SD 2.3) years of age with equal numbers of males and females. Prematurity was present in 28% of deliveries. The mean age of follow up of the children did not differ between term and preterm children with a mean (SD) age of follow up of 3.04 (SD 2.29) years and 3.08 (SD 2.24) years respectively. Of 1,262 births, 66 (5.3%) of the mother’s had pregnancies complicated by GDM, and 396 (31.4%) of the children developed atopic dermatitis.

When we limit our analyses to those 680 subjects who had specific IgE (sIgE) data available, 4.9% of mothers had gestational diabetes and 34.4% of infants developed atopic dermatitis. Based on sIgE, 51% were sensitized to at least one allergen (sIgE>0.1 kUA/L). If a cut point of 0.35 kUA/L is used, 44% were sensitized to at least one allergen. There was a high rate of maternal atopy in the cohort with 33.3 % of mothers having a history of an atopic disease including food allergy, atopic dermatitis, and asthma or rhinitis/hay fever.

Table 1 presents epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the children who had sIgE data. The table is stratified by the three groups of children, children without atopic dermatitis or sIgE to food allergen (reference group N=245)), children with atopic dermatitis (N=234), and children with sIgE to allergen (N=347). Of note, the groups of allergen sensitization and atopic dermatitis in this table are not mutually exclusive. Instead they describe the case groups for the separate outcomes of allergen sensitization and atopic dermatitis. The control group excludes all individuals with atopic dermatitis and known sIgE sensitization.

Table 1.

Description of infant/ perinatal factors and maternal factors by atopic dermatitis and any sensitization1

No atopic dermatitis/
No any sensitization
Atopic dermatitis Any
sensitization
(n=245) (n=234) (n=347)

Infant / Peri-natal Factors
mean (SD)
Age (years) 2.9 (2.2) 3.6 (2.3) 3.5 (2.3)
N (%)
Gender
 female 135(55.1) 107(45.7) 166(47.8)
 male 110(44.9) 127(54.3) 181(52.2)
Fetal growth
 normal 175(71.4) 177(76.0) 279(80.6)
 FGR 49(20.0) 29(12.4) 37(10.7)
 LGA 21(8.6) 27(11.6) 30(8.7)
Preterm 75(30.6) 56(23.9) 97(28.0)
Delivery by cesarean section 73(29.9) 70(30.2) 114(33.8)
Peripartum antibiotics use 115(50.4) 77(36.2) 120(38.7)
Breast or bottle feed
 Breast feeding 79(69.9) 72(84.7) 112(79.4)
 Bottle only 34(30.1) 13(15.3) 29(20.6)

Maternal Factors

N (%)
GDM 10(4.1) 17(7.3) 16(4.6)
Race
 black 169(69.0) 173(73.9) 260(74.9)
 Other 76(31.0) 61(26.1) 87(25.1)
Parity
  0 87(35.5) 100(42.7) 159(45.8)
  ≥1 158(64.5) 134(57.3) 188(54.2)
Family history of atopic diseases, yes 94(38.7) 81(35.1) 120(34.8)
Maternal prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)
 <18.5 12(4.9) 4(1.7) 13(3.7)
 18.5 to <25 108(44.1) 102(43.6) 145(41.8)
 25 to <30 64(26.1) 70(29.9) 117(33.7)
 ≥ 30 61(24.9) 58(24.8) 72(20.7)
Household income
   <$30,000 125(80.1) 116(83.5) 173(86.1)
   ≥$30,000 31(19.9) 23(16.5) 28(13.9)
Education
   <high school 75(31.0) 74(32.2) 110(32.3)
   high school 88(36.4) 78(33.9) 124(36.4)
   >high school 79(32.6) 78(33.9) 107(31.4)
1

The groups of food allergen sensitization and atopic dermatitis in this table are not mutually exclusive. Instead they describe the case groups for each analysis. Maternal history of atopic diseases included food allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and hay fever. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as SBWT <10th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Large for gestational age (LGA): is defined as SBWT >90th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Standardized birth weight (SBWT) is defined as birth weight standardized by mean and variance in the stratum of corresponding ethnic group, sex, and gestational week in the reference population using around 15,000 births born at BMC during 1998-2003.

GDM (7.3%) was more frequent among mothers of the children who developed atopic dermatitis but this only approached statistical significance. However, after the analyses are stratified by gestational age as shown in figure 1, it becomes clear that GDM increases the risk of both atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization in term infants, but has no effect in preterm infants. As a result, all subsequent analyses are stratified by preterm / term status.

Figure 1. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis and food allergen sensitization in children with and without GDM stratified by term / preterm Status.

Figure 1

Term children are represented by the solid bars. Preterm children are represented by the striped bars. The black solid and striped bars represent the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in term and preterm children respectively. The grey solid and striped bars represent the prevalence of allergen sensitization in term and preterm children respectively.

Associations of Maternal GDM with Atopic Dermatitis

Table 2 displays the results of 2 separate analyses evaluating the associations of GDM with atopic dermatitis. In the stratified analyses by preterm status, term children exposed to GDM in-utero had a 7.90 times increased risk of developing atopic dermatitis (OR, 95%CI=7.90, 1.53-40.94; p=0.01) after adjusting for maternal BMI. After further adjustment for fetal growth the effect size was slightly diminished (OR, 95%CI=5.86, 1.07-32.05, p=0.0412).

Table 2.

Association of maternal GDM with atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) including adjustment for maternal BMI
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
AD
N
(%) OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value

Term
 No GDM 330 164 49.7 1.00 1.00
 GDM 18 14 77.8 7.90 1.53,40.94 0.0138 7.38 1.53,35.71 0.0129
Preterm
 No GDM 122 53 43.4 1.00 0.75 0.46,1.22 0.2415
 GDM 9 3 33.3 0.60 0.10,3.65 0.5821 0.33 0.06,1.81 0.1997

Atopic dermatitis (AD) including adjustment for maternal BMI and
fetal growth
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
AD
N
(%) OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value

Term
 No GDM 330 164 49.7 1.00 1.00
 GDM 18 14 77.8 5.86 1.07,32.05 0.0412 6.50 1.30,32.57 0.0228
Preterm
 No GDM 122 53 43.4 1.00 0.68 0.41,1.11 0.1232
 GDM 9 3 33.3 0.74 0.11,4.91 0.7554 0.27 0.05,1.52 0.1361

Basic model is adjusted for children’s age, sex, maternal race (black/other), maternal education (<high school, high school, >high school),breast-feeding (breast/bottle feeding), peripartum antibiotics use (yes, no), family (paternal or maternal) history of atopic diseases ( including food allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and hay fever), parity (0,>=1), delivery by cesarean section, prepregnancy BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to <25, 25 to <30 and >= 30).

Fetal growth was characterized by use of standardized birth weight. Standardized birth weight (SBWT) is defined as birth weight standardized by mean and variance in the stratum of corresponding ethnic group, sex, and gestational week in the reference population using around 15,000 births born at BMC during 1998-2003.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as SBWT <10th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Large for gestational age (LGA): is defined as SBWT >90th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

To better understand these findings, we also evaluated whether GDM and gestational age had a joint effect on the outcomes as shown in the second column of analyses in Table 2. Compared to term infants without GDM, prematurity alone was not associated with atopic dermatitis (OR=0.75, 95% CI 0.46-1.22). The combination of preterm status and GDM together was not associated with atopic dermatitis (OR=0.33, 95% CI 0.06-1.81). Again, the highest risk was found in term children born to mothers with GDM (OR=7.38, 95%CI 1.53-35.71; p=0.01). This finding was unchanged on the analysis adjusting for fetal growth (OR=6.50, 95%CI 1.30-32.57; p=0.02). This is consistent with the findings of our stratified analysis.

Associations of Maternal GDM with Allergen Sensitization

We performed similar analysis for the outcome of allergen sensitization. As shown in Table 3, in the stratified analyses, term children exposed to GDM in-utero had a 6 times increased risk of allergen sensitization (OR, 95%CI=6.05, 1.17-31.18; p=0.03). After adjustment for fetal growth the result was no longer significant, but effect size was only slightly diminished (OR, 95%CI=4.85, 0.91-25.84, p=0.06). To better understand these findings, we also evaluated whether GDM and gestational age had a joint effect on the outcomes as shown in the second column of analyses in Table 3. Compared to term infants without GDM, prematurity alone was not associated with allergen sensitization (OR=1.00, 95% CI 0.65-1.52). The combination of preterm status and GDM was not associated with allergen sensitization (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.07-1.39). The direction of these findings is again consistent with the findings of our stratified analysis.

Table 3.

Association of maternal GDM with allergen sensitization in children

Sensitization including adjustment for maternal BMI
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
Sensiti
zation
N
(%) OR P value OR (95% CI) P value

Term
 No GDM 403 237 58.8 1.00 1.00
 GDM 17 13 76.5 6.05 1.17,31.18 0.031 5.81 1.18,28.61 0.0304
Preterm
 No GDM 163 94 57.7 1.00 1.01 0.65,1.52 0.9957
 GDM 9 3 33.3 0.33 0.07,1.60 0.1614 0.32 0.07,1.39 0.1281

Sensitization including adjustment for maternal BMI and fetal
growth
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
Cases
N
(%) OR P value OR (95% CI) P value

Term
 No GDM 403 237 58.8 1.00 1.00
 GDM 17 13 76.5 4.85 0.91,25.84 0.0643 5.29 1.04,26.77 0.0441
Preterm
 No GDM 163 94 57.7 1.00 0.90 0.59,1.39 0.6404
 GDM 9 3 33.3 0.37 0.07,1.88 0.2300 0.26 0.06,1.17 0.0788

Basic model is adjusted for children’s age, sex, maternal race (black/other), maternal education (<high school, high school, >high school),breast-feeding (breast/bottle feeding), peripartum antibiotics use, family (maternal or paternal) history of atopic diseases (including food allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and hay fever), parity (0,>=1), delivery by cesarean section, prepregnancy BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to <25, 25 to <30 and >= 30).

Fetal growth was characterized by use of standardized birth weight. Standardized birth weight (SBWT) is defined as birth weight standardized by mean and variance in the stratum of corresponding ethnic group, sex, and gestational week in the reference population using around 15,000 births born at BMC during 1998-2003.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as SBWT <10th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Large for gestational age (LGA): is defined as SBWT >90th percentile of the SBWT in the reference population at the same gestational week.

Associations of Maternal GDM on Food and Environmental Allergen Sensitization in Children

Table 4 presents the results of stratified and joint analyses of the effects of GDM on food allergen sensitization and aeroallergen sensitization, respectively. In term infants, GDM was associated with greater risk of food allergen sensitization (OR=8.28, 95%CI 1.59-43.20; p=0.01). The association with aeroallergen sensitization (OR=5.66, 95%CI 1.01-31.63; p=0.05) was of borderline significance. There were no effects seen in preterm children. Again, there was no evidence of a joint effect of preterm delivery and GDM in this population.

Table 4.

Evaluation of association of maternal GDM with food allergen and aeroallergen sensitization in children

Food Sensitization
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
Cases
N
(%)

Term
 No GDM 349 183 52.4 1.00 1.00
 GDM 17 13 76.5 8.28 1.59,43.20 0.0121 7.72 1.56,38.16 0.0122
Preterm
 No GDM 131 62 47.3 1.00 0.90 0.57,1.45 0.6650
 GDM 8 2 25.0 0.26 0.04,1.64 0.1513 0.30 0.05,1.62 0.1618

Aeroallergen sensitization
Stratified analysis Joint analysis

Term/ Preterm
Status
Total
N
Cases
N
(%)

Term
 No GDM 313 147 47.0 1.00 1.00
 GDM 13 9 69.2 5.66 1.01,31.63 0.0484 5.34 0.98,29.09 0.0530
Preterm
 No GDM 132 63 47.7 1.00 0.86 0.53,1.40 0.5408
 GDM 8 2 25.0 0.38 0.07,2.19 0.2810 0.29 0.05,1.64 0.1625

Adjusted for children’s age, sex, maternal race (black/others), maternal education (<high school, high school, >high school),breast-feeding (breast/bottle feeding), peripartum antibiotics use, family (maternal or paternal) history of atopic diseases (including food allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and hay fever), parity (0,>=1), delivery by cesarean section, prepregnancy BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to <25, 25 to <30 and >= 30).

Sensitivity analysis with a cut point of 0.35 vs. 0.1 kUA/L

In addition to using a cut point of 0.1 kUA/L, we also carried out a sensitivity analysis using a cut-off of 0.35 kUA/L as a definition of sensitization in the analyses. These results are presented in Online Tables 2 and 3, and show that the direction and significance of the effects is largely unchanged. The only exception is that the findings for aeroallergen sensitization became non- significant. Our data suggest that this study was not affected significantly by nonspecific antibody binding in the range between 0.1 kUA/L and 0.35 kUA/L.

Secondary Analysis of Associations of GDM by Nominal Regression

We carried out a nominal regression model, re-organizing the subjects into 4 groups: controls, atopic dermatitis only, sensitization only, and individuals with both sensitization and atopic dermatitis. The results are presented in Online Table 4. The odds ratio for those with atopic dermatitis and sensitization is increased (OR= 7.15, 95%CI 1.26-40.48). The effects for atopic dermatitis only (OR= 5.56, 95%CI 0.81- 38.32) and sensitization (OR= 2.06, 95%CI 0.30-14.20) only are no longer significant though the odds ratios are in the same direction, possibly due to smaller sample size.

Discussion

In this prospective birth cohort study, we found that gestational diabetes was significantly associated with increased risk of early childhood atopic dermatitis, and sensitization to both food- and aero-allergens in term infants even after accounting for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and fetal growth status. Specifically, term infants of pregnancies with GDM have a 7.57 fold increased risk of developing atopic dermatitis, and a 5.91 fold increased risk of allergen sensitization. Furthermore, only a minority of this effect seen in term infants, was accounted for by the inclusion of fetal growth as a covariate. These data suggest that, at least in term infants, prenatal metabolic risk factors increase the risk of allergic disease and sensitization in early life.

While our findings on GDM and atopic dermatitis, and sensitization to both food- and aero-allergens are novel, other findings are in general consistent with previous studies. Our findings that LGA was not associated with atopic dermatitis status is consistent with a number of other studies.35, 36 However, it is notable that some studies have found an association of birth weight, birth length and ponderal index with atopic sensitization and serum IgE,20-23 and a few others have found an association of LGA with atopic dermatitis.24, 25 Notably, these studies did not evaluate the role of GDM in addition to that of LGA. Furthermore, while maternal pre-pregnancy weight may influence the rates of gestational diabetes,12 in our analyses, the effects of GDM were independent of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI. The association of GDM with early childhood atopy mirrors some findings in a large Dutch epidemiological study of adults which found that insulin resistance may have mediated the association of obesity on allergen sensitization.10

Interestingly, we did not find any associations of GDM with atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization in preterm infants. The direction of the effect was in an opposite direction than the term children. Thus, it is unlikely that the lack of a similar effect in preterm infants is purely due to sample size. It is unclear if this is due to the duration of exposure to the insult or susceptibility to the insult at a particular point of immunological development. The fact that the effect of GDM was only seen in the term infants is consistent with the known effects of GDM on other disorders. Specifically, only hyperglycemia in the last trimester of pregnancy has been associated with augmented fetal growth.37 The differential findings between term and preterm births may also be due to non-controlled confounders such as antenatal steroids and early life feeding patterns, such as differences in duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding.

The biological mechanism by which GDM affects atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization remains unclear. The fact that the effect of GDM was still significant despite the inclusion of LGA in the model implies that the effects are likely due to exposure to GDM in utero but unlikely to occur via the same pathway which leads to fetal macrosomia. Other pathways need to be considered. Mothers with GDM have higher levels of TNF-alpha, leptin , and visfatin as well as lower levels of adiponectin.38-40 Adiponectin attenuates allergic inflammation in murine models.41 Thus, it is possible that altered levels of adipokines associated with GDM may have some effect on immunological development in infancy. Future studies will need to be carried out to evaluate these questions. Also, food allergen sensitization accounted for most of the impact of GDM on sensitization. The effect on aeroallergen sensitization was at best of borderline significance, and was no longer significant when a cut-off of 0.35 kUA/L was used to define sensitization instead of 0.1 kUA/L. It has been hypothesized that atopic dermatitis may augment food allergen sensitization.1 This hypothesis could suggest a reason for a differential effect on food and aeroallergen sensitization. This is consistent with our secondary analysis which found a larger effect of GDM in those with both atopic dermatitis and sensitization. There was less of an effect in those with atopic dermatitis only, and no clear effect on those with sensitization only. It is possible that some of the effect of GDM on sensitization may be via atopic dermatitis.

A particular strength of the Boston Birth Cohort is that it is a prospectively followed cohort with large numbers of inner-city minority subjects, and detailed and extensive phenotyping of pre- and peri-natal clinical data, including postnatal atopic phenotypes. However, our study has the following limitations: first, the data used to evaluate pre-pregnancy BMI was derived from self reported height and weight. This could lead to a systematic lowering of maternal BMI’s since individuals tend to underreport weight by up to 5 pounds.42, 43 While it is possible that this may lead to some residual confounding, the effect size for GDM was not diminished by the inclusion of maternal BMI in the final analysis. Second, despite the large number of children included in this report, the number of children born to mothers with GDM is relatively small. The smaller numbers in this group resulted in larger confidence intervals for our effects. Replication in even larger cohorts would be important. Another limitation is the duration of follow-up. The mean age of the children at follow-up was 3.2 years of age. While some children may not have developed the outcomes of interest by the time of follow up, studies such as the Multi-center Allergy Study suggest that most children who develop eczema will do so within the first 2 years of life.44 Also, other birth cohorts also found a significant number children to be sensitized within the first two years of life.45-47 Other questions may arise around the choice of a cut point of 0.1 kUA/L as evidence of sensitization. We obtained very similar findings in a sensitivity analysis with a cut point of 0.35 kUA/L, suggesting that our findings were not a function of nonspecific binding of the assay between 0.1 kUA/L and 0.35 kUA/L. Finally, caution should be exercised when generalizing our study findings to other populations since there was a high proportion of African-American and Latino subjects in our cohort, and most individuals were living in the inner city.

In summary, we found an association between GDM, a prevalent risk factor in inner-city populations, and the development of atopic dermatitis and sensitization to allergens, specifically food allergens, in the offspring. This is of great interest since the allergy and the obesity /metabolic syndrome epidemics are co-incident in westernized societies. Our findings suggest that there may be an early life link between these two epidemics. If replicated, our findings may open a new area for future investigation and offer a new potential for early prediction and prevention of allergic diseases.

Supplementary Material

01

Clinical Implications: Gestational diabetes may predispose to both allergen sensitization and atopic dermatitis in the offspring. Children affected by gestational diabetes may be at high risk for these atopic conditions.

Capsule Summary: In a prospective, inner-city birth cohort study of 680 children,Kumar et al found that gestational diabetes was associated with an increased risk of atopic dermatitis and allergen sensitization in the offspring, independent of maternal pre pre-gnancy BMI.

Acknowledgements

The parent study is in part supported by the March of Dimes PERI grants (PI: Wang, 20-FY02-56), NIEHS (PI: Wang, R21 ES011666), and NICHD (PI: Wang, R01 HD041702). The follow-up study is in part supported by Food Allergy Project and NIAID (PI Wang, R21AI079872). Dr. Kumar is also supported by the NHLBI (PI: Kumar, K23HL093023).

Abbreviations used

BBC

Boston birth cohort

BMI

body mass index

BMC

Boston University Medical Center

FGR

fetal growth restriction

IUGR

intrauterine growth restriction

GDM

gestational diabetes

LGA

large for gestational age

LMP

last menstrual period

SBWT

standardized birth weight

sIgE

specific IgE

SES

socio-economic status

Footnotes

None of the authors have a conflict of interest pertaining to this work.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Lack G. Epidemiologic risks for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:1331–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barker D. Mothers, babies and disease in later life. BMJ Publishing Group; London: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar R. Prenatal factors and the development of asthma. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20:682–7. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283154f26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peters JL, Suglia SF, Platts-Mills TA, Hosen J, Gold DR, Wright RJ. Relationships among prenatal aeroallergen exposure and maternal and cord blood IgE: project ACCESS. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:1041–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ege MJ, Herzum I, Buchele G, Krauss-Etschmann S, Lauener RP, Roponen M, et al. Prenatal exposure to a farm environment modifies atopic sensitization at birth. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:407–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mortimer K, Neugebauer R, Lurmann F, Alcorn S, Balmes J, Tager I. Air pollution and pulmonary function in asthmatic children: effects of prenatal and lifetime exposures. Epidemiology. 2008;19:550–7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816a9dcb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rebordosa C, Kogevinas M, Sorensen HT, Olsen J. Pre-natal exposure to paracetamol and risk of wheezing and asthma in children: a birth cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:583–90. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang C, Salam MT, Islam T, Wenten M, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland FD. Effects of in utero and childhood tobacco smoke exposure and beta2-adrenergic receptor genotype on childhood asthma and wheezing. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e107–14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Radon K, Schulze A, Schierl R. Dietrich-Gumperlein G, Nowak D, Jorres RA. Serum leptin and adiponectin levels and their association with allergic sensitization. Allergy. 2008;63:1448–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Husemoen LL, Glumer C, Lau C, Pisinger C, Morch LS, Linneberg A. Association of obesity and insulin resistance with asthma and aeroallergen sensitization. Allergy. 2008;63:575–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chu SY, Kim SY, Bish CL. Prepregnancy Obesity Prevalence in the United States, 2004-2005. Matern Child Health J. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0388-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abenhaim HA, Kinch RA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher R. Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275:39–43. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0219-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schaefer-Graf UM, Heuer R, Kilavuz O, Pandura A, Henrich W, Vetter K. Maternal obesity not maternal glucose values correlates best with high rates of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. J Perinat Med. 2002;30:313–21. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2002.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rusconi F, Galassi C, Forastiere F, Bellasio M, De Sario M, Ciccone G, et al. Maternal complications and procedures in pregnancy and at birth and wheezing phenotypes in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:16–21. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1978OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yuan W, Fonager K, Olsen J, Sorensen HT. Prenatal factors and use of anti-asthma medications in early childhood: a population-based Danish birth cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:763–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1025390420122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yuan W, Basso O, Sorensen HT, Olsen J. Fetal growth and hospitalization with asthma during early childhood: a follow-up study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1240–5. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sin DD, Spier S, Svenson LW, Schopflocher DP, Senthilselvan A, Cowie RL, et al. The relationship between birth weight and childhood asthma: a population-based cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:60–4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rasanen M, Kaprio J, Laitinen T, Winter T, Koskenvuo M, Laitinen LA. Perinatal risk factors for asthma in Finnish adolescent twins. Thorax. 2000;55:25–31. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rona RJ, Smeeton NC, Bustos P, Amigo H, Diaz PV. The early origins hypothesis with an emphasis on growth rate in the first year of life and asthma: a prospective study in Chile. Thorax. 2005;60:549–54. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.032359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leadbitter P, Pearce N, Cheng S, Sears MR, Holdaway MD, Flannery EM, et al. Relationship between fetal growth and the development of asthma and atopy in childhood. Thorax. 1999;54:905–10. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.10.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu B, Pekkanen J, Laitinen J, Jarvelin MR. Body build from birth to adulthood and risk of asthma. Eur J Public Health. 2002;12:166–70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/12.3.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bolte G, Schmidt M, Maziak W, Keil U, Nasca P, von Mutius E, et al. The relation of markers of fetal growth with asthma, allergies and serum immunoglobulin E levels in children at age 5-7 years. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:381–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rasanen M, Kaprio J, Laitinen T, Winter T, Koskenvuo M, Laitinen LA. Perinatal risk factors for hay fever--a study among 2550 Finnish twin families. Twin Res. 2001;4:392–9. doi: 10.1375/1369052012579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kerkhof M, Koopman LP, van Strien RT, Wijga A, Smit HA, Aalberse RC, et al. Risk factors for atopic dermatitis in infants at high risk of allergy: the PIAMA study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:1336–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Olesen AB, Ellingsen AR, Olesen H, Juul S, Thestrup-Pedersen K. Atopic dermatitis and birth factors: historical follow up by record linkage. Bmj. 1997;314:1003–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Drougia A, Giapros V, Hotoura E, Papadopoulou F, Argyropoulou M, Andronikou S. The effects of gestational age and growth restriction on compensatory kidney growth. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rotteveel J, van Weissenbruch MM, Twisk JW, Delemarre-Van de Waal HA. Infant and childhood growth patterns, insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure in prematurely born young adults. Pediatrics. 2008;122:313–21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar R, Yu Y, Story RE, Pongracic JA, Gupta R, Pearson C, et al. Prematurity, chorioamnionitis, and the development of recurrent wheezing: a prospective birth cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:878–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jaakkola JJ, Ahmed P, Ieromnimon A, Goepfert P, Laiou E, Quansah R, et al. Preterm delivery and asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:823–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwartz J, Gold D, Dockery DW, Weiss ST, Speizer FE. Predictors of asthma and persistent wheeze in a national sample of children in the United States. Association with social class, perinatal events, and race. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:555–62. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.von Mutius E, Nicolai T, Martinez FD. Prematurity as a risk factor for asthma in preadolescent children. J Pediatr. 1993;123:223–9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81692-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang X, Zuckerman B, Pearson C, Kaufman G, Chen C, Wang G, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking, metabolic gene polymorphism, and infant birth weight. Jama. 2002;287:195–202. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Seidell JC, Flegal KM. Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology. Br Med Bull. 1997;53:238–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang L, Wang X, Laird N, Zuckerman B, Stubblefield P, Xu X. Polymorphism in maternal LRP8 gene is associated with fetal growth. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:770–7. doi: 10.1086/503712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Purvis DJ, Thompson JM, Clark PM, Robinson E, Black PN, Wild CJ, et al. Risk factors for atopic dermatitis in New Zealand children at 3.5 years of age. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:742–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moore MM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman KP, Camargo CA, Jr., Gold DR, et al. Perinatal predictors of atopic dermatitis occurring in the first six months of life. Pediatrics. 2004;113:468–74. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schaefer-Graf UM, Kjos SL, Kilavuz O, Plagemann A, Brauer M, Dudenhausen JW, et al. Determinants of fetal growth at different periods of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:193–8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krzyzanowska K, Krugluger W, Mittermayer F, Rahman R, Haider D, Shnawa N, et al. Increased visfatin concentrations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;110:605–9. doi: 10.1042/CS20050363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lewandowski KC, Stojanovic N, Press M, Tuck SM, Szosland K, Bienkiewicz M, et al. Elevated serum levels of visfatin in gestational diabetes: a comparative study across various degrees of glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 2007;50:1033–7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0610-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gao XL, Yang HX, Zhao Y. Variations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, leptin and adiponectin in mid-trimester of gestational diabetes mellitus. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:701–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shore SA. Obesity and asthma: possible mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:1087–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.03.004. quiz 94-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dekkers JC, van Wier MF, Hendriksen IJ, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W. Accuracy of self-reported body weight, height and waist circumference in a Dutch overweight working population. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shields M, Gorber SC, Tremblay MS. Estimates of obesity based on self-report versus direct measures. Health Rep. 2008;19:61–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Illi S, von Mutius E, Lau S, Nickel R, Gruber C, Niggemann B, et al. The natural course of atopic dermatitis from birth to age 7 years and the association with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:925–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.01.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Johnson CC, Peterson EL, Ownby DR. Gender differences in total and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations in a population-based cohort from birth to age four years. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:1145–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.de Benedictis FM, Franceschini F, Hill D, Naspitz C, Simons FE, Wahn U, et al. The allergic sensitization in infants with atopic eczema from different countries. Allergy. 2009;64:295–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Prescott SL, Wiltschut J, Taylor A, Westcott L, Jung W, Currie H, et al. Early markers of allergic disease in a primary prevention study using probiotics: 2.5-year follow-up phase. Allergy. 2008;63:1481–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES