Abstract
Objective
To investigate the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic property of the fruits and leaves of Spondias dulcis (S. dulcis).
Methods
Methanolic extracts of fruits and leaves of S. dulcis were partitioned with chloroform and dichloromethane. The antioxidant potential of the crude extract and partitioned fractions were evaluated in terms of total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, DPPH radical scavenging potential, reducing potential and total antioxidant capacity by specific standard procedures. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using disc diffusion method. The cytotoxicity was evaluated by using brine shrimp lethality bioassay and compared with vincristine sulfate. The thrombolytic activity was compared with streptokinase.
Results
The methanolic fruit extract exhibited the highest phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity, among the other extracts, with the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 10 µg/mL (IC50: 1.91 µg/mL) and maximum reducing power at a concentration of 100 µg/mL (EC50: 3.58 µg/mL). Though all extract showed moderate antimicrobial activity against the bacterial strains, weak or no activity against fungus. The range of LC50 value of all extracts was 1.335-14.057 µg/mL which was far lower than the cut off index for cytotoxicity. All extracts exhibited statistically significant (P<0.001) thrombolytic activity.
Conclusions
Our study suggested that S. dulcis exhibits antimicrobial activities against a wide variety of strains while it possesses significant antioxidant, cytotoxic and thrombolytic activity.
Keywords: Spondias dulcis, Antioxidant activity, Antimicrobial activity, Cytotoxic activity, Thrombolytic activity, DPPH, IC50, LC50
1. Introduction
The demand in study of plants, which is one of the richest sources of promising versatile chemical compounds and medicinal values, is growing constantly throughout the world during the last few decades. Therefore plant could play a great role in exploring new arsenals against the threats of new and recent diseases. Because of their potent pharmacological activity, low toxicity and economic feasibility, investigation of the medicinal properties of plant has been performed[1]. Along with the nutritional value, plants contribute in the protection from free radical deterioration by hindrance of lipid peroxidation via numerous mechanisms including scavenging free radicals[2], inducing antioxidant enzymes[3], modulating protein kinase, and lipid kinase signaling pathway[4], inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX 2) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP 2 and MMP 9) enzymatic activity[5],[6], influencing phytoestrogenic and nuclear transcription factor NF-κB[7],[8], inducing cell cycle arrest and phase 1 or phase 2 metabolizing enzymes[9],[10]. Oxidative damage done by free radicals causes the pathogenesis of many deadly diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's and diabetes[11]. Due to the possible toxicity of synthetic antioxidant, scientists recently have focused on using plant materials as natural antioxidant[12]. In addition to the peril multiple drug resistance resulting from the chaotic application of commercial antimicrobial drugs, adverse effects such as hypersensivity, allergic reaction, immune suppression abdominal pain, anorexia etc. drive the scientists to explore new and effective antimicrobial agents that could act as an alternative of the current regimens[13]–[15]. Cancer, a notorious disease of present time, has become the major cause of human mortality in the world, and approximately half of incidence and mortality occurs in Asia[16]. Nevertheless, accelerating numerous side effects, chemotherapeutic drugs are still regarded as the most effective treatments for cancer. Concerning the serious crisis, scientists have currently engaged in finding natural medicine resources as an alternative to current chemotherapeutic regimens. Besides, phytochemicals containing antioxidant potentials showed capacity to inhibit carcinogenesis[17]. Several studies revealed that antioxidants are related to other bioactivities e.g. in vitro cytotoxicity in tumor cell and in vivo cytotoxicity in experimental animals and anticarcinogenesis[18]–[20]. Almost all currently available thrombolytic regimens have some vital shortcomings including limited fibrin specificity, noteworthy bleeding tendency and large dose requirement. To counter this dilemma, extensive researches are carried out to find more effective natural resources which can be used as an alternative regimen[21]–[23].
The genus Spondias (Anacardiaceae) consists of 17 species; seven of which are native to the neotropics and about 10 are native to tropical Asia. About 10 species of Spondias bear edible fruits. Though Spondias dulcis (S. dulcis) is native to Melanesia through Polynesia, it is also abundant in Bangladesh. S. dulcis is a fast growing equatorial tree with edible fruits which is popular in Bangladesh in the name of amra while its English name is Hog pulm or golden apple. Though it is most commonly used as food source, the astringent bark is used as a remedy for diarrhea in Cambodia[24]. S. dulcis is also used in eyesight enhancement and eye infections[25], and the fruit is used to cure itchiness, internal ulceration, sore throat and inflammation of skin. The fruit is also used as an antidote[26]. Moreover, the polysaccharide identified from the fruits pulp has eliciting activity on peritoneal macrophages[27]. Furthermore, a study conducted using leaves of the plant has shown antidiabetic activity[28]. To date, there is no study comparing the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic potential of various extracts of fruit and leaves of S. dulcis. The report of previous studies conducted using various parts of Spondias pinnata influenced us to explore similar type of activity from S. dulcis.
Therefore, the present study was conducted on different extracts (methanol, chloroform, and dichloromethane) of fruit and leaves in order to evaluate the plant as a source of natural antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant collection
Fruits and leaves of S. dulcis were collected in August 2011, from Mirzapur (Tangail), Bangladesh. The fresh leaves were then thoroughly washed to remove soil and dirt while the peel and seed of the fruits were removed. Both the leaves and chopped fruits were then shade dried for 2 weeks followed by grinding into fine particles. They were then kept in two separate closed containers at room temperature until further used. The plant was identified at Bangladesh National Herbarium where a voucher specimen was deposited.
2.2. Extraction
The pulverized plant materials were soaked in 3.5 L of methanol in separate containers and kept for 1 week with occasional shaking. The whole mixtures were then filtered through sterilized cotton followed by Whatman No. 1 filter paper and concentrated using a rotary evaporator (IKA, Germany). The weight of crude extracts of fruits and leaves were 135 g and 101 g, respectively. A total of 40 g crude extract of each plant materials was then partitioned with chloroform and dichloromethane. The percentage yields of fruit and leaves were methanol (21.3%, 15.8%), chloroform (19.5%, 23.1%) and dichloromethane (20.9%, 25.4%) respectively.
2.3. Chemicals and reagents
1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), L-ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin and Folin-Ciocalteu reagent were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, USA). Analytical grade dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol and chloroform were purchased from BDH, E Merck. Vincristine Sulphate was purchased from Cipla Ltd., Goa, India. Cephradin and nystatin were purchased from Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh. Streptokinase was purchased from Beacon pharmaceutical Ltd., Bangladesh. All other chemicals and reagents of analytical grade including methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were from Merck (Germany).
2.4. Phytochemical screening
The freshly prepared crude extracts of the fruit and leaves of S. dulcis were qualitatively tested for the presence of alkaloids (Dragandroff's reagent), flavonoids (cyanidine reaction), steroids (Salkowski test), terpenoids (Modified Salkowski test), reducing sugars (Fehling reagent), saponins (Frothing test), tannins (iron chloride), cardiac glycosides (Keller-Killani test) and anthraquinones (Chloroform layer test)[29]–[31].
2.5. Antioxidant activity
2.5.1. Total phenolic content
The total phenols in extracts and fractions of S. dulcis were determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent[32]. About 0.5 mL of the each extract of concentration of 1 mg/mL was mixed with 5 mL Folin ciocalteu reagent (1:10 v/v distilled water) and 4 mL (75 g/L) of sodium carbonate. The mixture was allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature in dark place after vortexing it for 15 seconds and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm against methanol as blank by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The total phenolic contents were expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in mg/g of dry weight. For correlation study between total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity, the whole procedure was repeated to determine the phenolic content of various sample concentration (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg/mL).
2.5.2. Total flavonoid content
The total flavonoid in each fraction of S. dulcis was measured by aluminum chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric method[33]. About 0.5 mL methanol solution of each extract of concentration of 10 mg/mL was mixed with 1.5 mL of methanol, 0.1 mL of 10% aluminum chloride, 0.1 mL of 1 mol/L potassium acetate and 2.8 mL of distilled water. The blank was prepared in similar fashion by replacing AlCl3 with distilled water. Both sample and blank solution were filtered through double rings filter paper. After an incubation period of 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 415 nm against the blank by using a UV- visible spectrophotometer. The total flavonoid contents were expressed as quercetin equivalent in mg/g of dry weight.
2.5.3. DPPH free radical scavenging activity
The radical scavenging activity of each fraction of S. dulcis was estimated using stable free radical of DPPH[34]. About 2.0 mL of methanol solution of each extract at different concentration (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/mL) were mixed with 3.0 mL of DPPH methanol solution (20 µg/mL). After an incubation period of 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm against methanol as blank by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The radical scavenging activity (%) was calculated based on the following formula:
DPPH scavenging activity (%)=[(AB-AT)/AB]×100
Where AB and AT are the absorbance of blank and plant material, respectively.
The percentage scavenging activity of each extract was compared with L-ascorbic acid, the positive control. IC50 value of each extract was determined from the plotted graph of percentage DPPH neutralization vs. concentration of extract, which was defined as the amount of antioxidant required to reduce the initial DPPH free radical concentration by 50%.
2.5.4. Reducing power assay
The reducing power of all the extracts of S. dulcis were measured by the method previously described by Oyaizu[35]. About 1 mL of each extract of varying concentrations (1, 5, 10, 50, 100 µg/mL) in double distilled water was mixed with 2.5 mL phosphate buffer and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 20 min after which, 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), was added and centrifuged at 3 000 r/min for 10 min. From each tube, 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 2.5 mL distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% ferric chloride. Incubation with water in place of additives was used as blank while L-ascorbic acid was used as positive control. The absorbance was measured at 700 nm by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Increased absorbance of the reaction mixture suggests increasing reducing power. The reducing power (%) was calculated based on the following formula:
Reducing power (%)=[(AT-AB)/AB]×100
Where AB and AT are the absorbance of blank and plant material, respectively.
Effective concentration, EC50 value of each extract was estimated from the plotted graph of percentage reducing power vs. concentration of extract.
2.5.5. Total antioxidant capacity
The total antioxidant capacity of all the extracts of S. dulcis were estimated by phosphomolybdenum method[36]. About 0.2 mL of each extract of concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was mixed with 2 mL reagent solution (600 mmol/L sulfuric acid, 28 mmol/L sodium phosphate and 4 mmol/L ammonium molybdate). The reaction mixtures were then incubated at 95 °C for 1 h. The absorbance was measured at 695 nm against a blank containing 3 mL reagent solution by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The total antioxidant activity of the crude extract was expressed as gallic acid equivalents in mg/g of dry weight. For correlation study, the whole procedure was repeated to determine the total antioxidant capacity of various sample concentration (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg/mL).
2.6. Antimicrobial activity
A total of 13 reference microbial strains (four Gram-positive, seven Gram-negative and two fungi) were used as the test organism for the antimicrobial screening of all the fruits and leaves extracts of S. dulcis. The antimicrobial activity of the plant extracts against the test organisms was performed by disc diffusion method using standard disc (30 µg/disc) for comparison[37]. Cephradin and nystatin were used as the standard disc for comparing antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The test organisms were inoculated on 10 mL previously sterilized nutrient agar media, mixed thoroughly and transferred immediately to the sterile petri dish under an aseptic condition using a sterile loop. The paper discs containing the sample extract and standard disc were placed to the corresponding petri dish and were incubated for overnight at 37 °C. Clear zone of inhibition around the discs represented the presence of antimicrobial activity which was measured in millimeter (mm).
2.6.1. Collection of microorganisms
The microbial species used in the present study were Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Sarcina lutea, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella paratyphi, Salmonella typhi, Shigella boydii, Shigella dysentery, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio mimicus, Candida albicans, and Sacharomyces cerevacae. These were collected as pure cultures from the Institute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Dhaka University and International Center for Diarrheal Disease and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
2.7. Determination of cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic potentiality of all the extracts of S. dulcis were performed on brine shrimp nauplii using Mayer's method[38],[39]. The eggs of brine shrimp (Artemia salina Leach) were collected and hatched in a tank containing 1 L of simulated seawater at a temperature around 37 °C and pH 8.4 with constant oxygen supply. Two days were allowed to hatch and mature the nauplii. Pure DMSO solutions of the extracts were applied to Artemia salina in a one-day in vivo assay. About 4 mg of each extracts was dissolved in DMSO and solutions with varying concentrations (400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, 1.563, 0.781 µg/mL) obtained by serial dilution technique. The prepared test solutions were added to the pre-marked vials containing 10 live brine shrimp nauplii in 5 mL simulated seawater and incubated for 24 h. After incubation period, the vials were examined using a magnifying glass in order to count the number of survived nauplii in each vial. From this data, the lethality percent of the brine shrimp nauplii was calculated for each concentration. The median lethal concentration, LC50 and LC90 of each tested sample was calculated from the plotted graph of percentage of the shrimp mortality vs. logarithm of the sample concentration, which was defined as the amount of extract required to kill 50% of brine shrimps and the amount of extract required to kill 90% of brine shrimps within 24 h of exposure respectively.
2.8. Thrombolytic activity
The in vitro thrombolytic potential of each extract of S. dulcis was evaluated with the method developed by Daginawala using streptokinase as the standard substance[40]. A total of 8 mL venous blood was drawn from six healthy volunteers (three male and three female) without a history of oral contraceptive or anticoagulant therapy. Blood from each volunteer was distributed in eight different pre-weighed sterile microcentrifuge tube and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min. After clot formation, serum was completely aspirated out without disturbing the clot formed and the weight of clot in each tube was measured. To each microcentrifuge tube containing pre-weighed clot, 100 µL aqueous solution of different extracts with the concentration of 10 mg/mL was added separately. Then, 100 µL of streptokinase (SK) and 100 µL of distilled water were separately added to the control tube as positive and negative controls, respectively. All the tubes were then incubated at 37 °C for 90 min and observed for clot lysis. After incubation, the released fluid was removed and tubes were again weighed to observe the difference in weight after clot disruption. Difference in weight before and after clot lysis was expressed as percentage of clot lysis as shown below:
% of clot lysis = (weight of released clot /clot weight)×100
2.9. Statistical analysis
All values were expressed as mean±SD of three parallel determinations. The median lethal concentration, LC50, LC90 and 95% confidence interval of test sample were calculated using probit analysis method described by Finney as a measure of toxicity of the plant extract. All values of thrombolytic activity were calculated as mean±SEM of three parallel determinations and were evaluated using t-test. P< 0.001 was regarded as statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Phytochemical screening
Phytochemical screening of the crude extract revealed the absence of anthraquinone and reducing sugar in fruits while only anthraquinone was absent in leaves. The phytochemical screening of the crude extracts is described in Table 1.
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of the crude extract of fruit and leaves of S. dulcis.
Sample | Anthraquinone | Saponin | Steroid | Alkaloid | Cardiac Glycoside | Tannin | Flavonoid | Terpenoid | Reducing sugar |
Fruit | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - |
Leaf | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3.2. Total phenolic and flavonoid content
Table 2 provides information about the total phenolic and falvonoid content in the six extracts of fruits and leaves considered in this study. The highest phenolic and flavonid content were found in the methanolic extract of fruit which amounted to (659.74±0.97) GAE/g of dry weight and (225.60±0.88) mg quercetin equivalents/g of dried weight, respectively. Among the leaf extracts, dichloromethane fraction was found to contain the highest phenolic and flavonid content while methanol extract was recorded to contain the lowest phenolic content. Of all extracts, the lowest amount of flavonoid was recorded in chloroform leaf extract which amounted to (28.21±0.63) mg quercetin equivalents/g of dried extract. The correlation between total phenolic and total antioxidant activity of fruit and leaf was studied using linear regression analysis, which is symbolized through Figures 1 and 2 respectively.
Table 2. Total phenolics, flavonoids content and antioxidant activity of the different extracts of S. dulcis.
Sample | Extract | Total phenolics (mg/g of dry weight) | Total flavonoids (mg/g of dry weight) | Total antioxidant activity (mg/g of dry weight) |
S. dulcis fruit | Methanol | 659.74±0.97 | 225.60±0.88 | 118.46±0.48 |
Chloroform | 214.59±0.65 | 51.79±0.21 | 19.27±0.82 | |
S. dulcis leaf | Dichloromethane | 443.97±0.77 | 124.21±0.27 | 63.45±0.69 |
Methanol | 16.35±0.50 | 33.96±0.41 | 2.98±0.70 | |
Chloroform | 22.62±0.80 | 28.21±0.63 | 3.46±0.32 | |
Dichloromethane | 35.44±0.27 | 47.76±0.43 | 5.69±0.61 |
Figure 1. Correlation between total phenolic content and total antioxidant capacity of different extracts of fruit of S. dulcis.
Figure 2. Correlation between total phenolic content and total antioxidant capacity of different extracts of leaf of S. dulcis.
3.3. DPPH free radical scavenging activity
The percentage of DPPH neutralization of all extracts was found to be concentration dependent. Methanol fraction of fruit produced the maximum free radical scavenging activity with IC50 value of 1.91 µg/mL, which was lower than that of reference antioxidant of the test. Among all leaf extract, dichloromethane fraction of leaf was found to produce the maximum free radical scavenging activity with IC50 value slightly higher than the standard antioxidant used in the test. In both fruit and leaf, chloroform fraction showed the weakest free radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 7.30 and 8.96 µg/mL for the fruit and leaf, respectively (Table 3). Figure 3 represents the percentage of DPPH neutralization activity of all extracts considered in the study.
Table 3. DPPH free radical scavenging and reducing activity of the different extracts of S. dulcis.
Sample | IC50 (µg/mL) | EC50 (µg/mL) |
Methanol fruit extract | 1.91 | 3.58 |
Chloroform fruit extract | 7.30 | 20.23 |
Dichloromethane fruit extract | 5.85 | 8.45 |
Methanol leaf extract | 5.37 | 12.45 |
Chloroform leaf extract | 8.96 | 32.95 |
Dichloromethane leaf extract | 5.00 | 9.37 |
Ascorbic acid | 4.94 | 5.10 |
Figure 3. DPPH scavenging ability of S. dulcis.
3.4. Reducing power assay
The reducing power of all extracts was also found to be concentration dependent. The EC50 value is described in Table 3 while the percentage of reducing power is illustrated in Figure 4. Like percentage of DPPH neutralization activity, methanol fruit extract provided the most intense reducing power with EC50 value of 3.58 µg/mL, which was lower than that of standard antioxidant used in the test. Among leaf extracts, dichloromethane fraction produced the most pronounced reducing power with an EC50 value of 9.37 µg/mL. The least reducing power was recorded in chloroform leaf extract with a comparatively higher EC50 value of 32.95 µg/mL.
Figure 4. Reducing potential of S. dulcis.
3.5. Total antioxidant capacity
Total antioxidant capacity of all extracts is expressed in Table 2. The most powerful antioxidant activity was recorded in methanol fruit extract which amounted to (118.46±0.48) mg GAE equivalents/g of dry weight while the methanol leaf extract was found to provide the least antioxidant activity which amounted to (2.98±0.70) mg GAE equivalents/g of dry weight. In brief, the fruit extract showed stronger antioxidant capacity than the leaf extract. The higher correlations between total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity were detected for all extracts of fruit (R2 range: 0.977 7- 0.996 7) and leaves (R2 range: 0.937 7- 0.981 5) of S. dulcis.
3.6. Antimicrobial activity
The results of different extracts of S. dulcis with disc diffusion method are shown in Table 4. The antimicrobial activity of all test fractions was tested using two different concentration i.e. 400 and 800 µg/disc. The antimicrobial activity increased with increasing concentration. Among fruit extract, the zones of inhibition at concentration of 400 and 800 µg/disc were ranged from 0.0 to 12.0 mm and 0.0 to 16.0 mm, respectively. Of leaf extract, the zones of inhibition at concentration of 400 and 800 µg/disc were ranged from 0.0 to 12.0 mm and 0.0 to 15.0 mm, respectively. All extracts showed variable inhibitory activity against the strains tested in the study while methanol fruit extract and dichloromethane leaf extract showed no activity against Sacharomyces cerevacae. Among the Gram-positive strains, the most pronounced inhibitory activity was found for methanol fruit extract against Sarcina lutea with the inhibition zone of 12 mm at 400 µg/disc and 16 mm at 800 µg/disc while methanol leaf extract showed potent inhibitory activity against Bacillus subtilis with the inhibition zone of 12 mm at 400 µg/disc and 16 mm at 800 µg/disc. Among the Gram-negative strains, the most potent inhibitory activity was found for chloroform fruit extract against Shigella boydii and Salmonella paratyphi. Methanol extract of both fruit and leaf showed equal inhibitory activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the inhibition zone was 12 mm at 400 µg/disc and 15 mm at 800 µg/disc. The most potent antifungal activity was given by chloroform leaf extract against Candida albicans. Furthermore, chloroform leaf extract showed good antimicrobial activity against Shigella dysentery.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of the different extracts of S. dulcis (mm).
Strains |
S. dulcis fruit (mg) |
S. dulcis leaf (mg) |
Control |
|||||||||||
Methanol |
Chloroform |
Dichloromethane |
Methanol |
Chloroform |
Dichloromethane |
Positive | Negative | |||||||
400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | |||
B. cereus | 5 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 25 | 0 |
B. subtilis | 7 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 26 | 0 |
S. lutea | 12 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 21 | 0 |
S. aureus | 10 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 0 |
E. coli | 7 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 27 | 0 |
S. paratyphi | 10 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 25 | 0 |
S. typhi | 9 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 8 | 20 | 0 |
S. boydii | 11 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 13 | 23 | 0 |
S. dysentery | 7 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 5 | 9 | 22 | 0 |
V. mimicus | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 22 | 0 |
P. aeruginosa | 12 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 25 | 0 |
C. albicans | 7 | 13 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 0 |
S. cerevacae | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
3.7. Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic potential of all six extracts was compared with vincristine sulfate, the positive control which is illustrated in Table 5. Furthermore, the LC50, LC90 and 95% confidence interval are also expressed in Table 5. The LC50 value for all extracts with 24 h observation was far lower than the cut off value for cytotoxicity. Methanolic leaf extract exhibited the lowest LC50 value (1.335 µg/mL) while chloroform leaf extract showed the highest LC50 value (14.057 µg/mL) among the other extracts. The LC50 value of vincristine sulfate was 3.339 µg/mL.
Table 5. Cytotoxic activity of the different extracts of S. dulcis.
Sample | Probit at different concentration tested (µg/mL) |
LC50 (µg/mL) | LC90 (µg/mL) | 95% confidence interval | |||||||||
0.781 | 1.563 | 3.125 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ||||
Methanol fruit extract | 4.72 | 4.85 | 4.85 | 5.15 | 5.28 | 5.28 | 5.58 | 5.77 | 6.23 | --- | 3.745 | 629.292 | 4.996-5.605 |
Chloroform fruit extract | 4.23 | 4.56 | 4.56 | 4.85 | 4.85 | 5.00 | 5.44 | 5.44 | 5.77 | 6.23 | 12.778 | 1 109.913 | 4.710-5.475 |
Dichloromethane fruit extract | 4.05 | 4.56 | 4.85 | 5.00 | 5.15 | 5.28 | 5.28 | 5.77 | 5.95 | --- | 8.964 | 662.878 | 4.738-5.459 |
Methanol leaf extract | 4.85 | 5.15 | 5.28 | 5.28 | 5.58 | 5.77 | 6.23 | 6.23 | --- | --- | 1.335 | 111.860 | 5.234-5.857 |
Chloroform leaf extract | 4.23 | 4.56 | 4.56 | 4.72 | 4.85 | 5.15 | 5.44 | 5.44 | 5.77 | --- | 14.057 | 1 784.177 | 4.653-5.284 |
Dichloromethane leaf extract | 4.42 | 4.56 | 4.85 | 5.28 | 5.77 | 5.77 | 5.95 | --- | --- | --- | 3.572 | 81.936 | 4.840-5.616 |
Vincristine sulfate | 4.16 | 4.75 | 5.00 | 5.25 | 5.84 | 5.84 | 6.28 | --- | --- | --- | 3.339 | 47.203 | 4.847-5.758 |
3.8. Thrombolytic activity
Thrombolytic activity of all the fruit and leaf extracts of S. dulcis is presented in Table 6. The maximum activity was recorded in chloroform fruit extract which amounted to (25.303±0.213)% of clot lysis while streptokinase exhibited a clot lysis of (50.005±0.277)%. Among leaf extracts, dichloromethane fraction showed maximum activity. The mean difference in clot lysis percentage between positive and negative control (sterile distilled water) was found statistically significant. Nevertheless, all extracts demonstrated statistically significant thrombolytic activity (P<0.001).
Table 6. Thrombolytic activity of the different extracts of S. dulcis.
Sample | Percentage of clot lysis |
Methanol fruit extract | 13.876±0.283 |
Chloroform fruit extract | 25.303±0.213 |
Dichloromethane fruit extract | 7.841±0.067 |
Methanol leaf extract | 7.758±0.210 |
Chloroform leaf extract | 6.486±0.210 |
Dichloromethane leaf extract | 10.570±0.079 |
Streptokinase (positive control) | 50.005±0.277 |
Water (blank) | 2.610±0.360 |
4. Discussion
Both edible and non edible plants hold ample phenolic compounds which have the potential to exhibit multiple biological effects including antioxidant activity[36]. The hydroxyl groups of phenolic compounds allow them to exert direct antioxidative activity and were found to play a vital role in stabilizing lipid peroxidation[41],[42]. They are known as powerful chain breaking antioxidants. However, flavonoid found in plants have antioxidant activity in vitro or in vivo[43]. Antioxidative potential of flavonoid depends on their chemical structure, especially of 3′,4′- orthodihydroxy group on the B cycle and the 4- carbonyl group on the C cycle. The 3-OH and 5-OH group on the C cycle are also relevant to the antioxidant activity. The hydroxyl group located on the C3 of the C cycle of flavonols is recommended as the vital site for scavenging free radicals[44],[45]. In general, the fruit extracts were found to have higher amount of phenolic and flavonoid components compared with leaf extracts.
The scavenging potential of all six extracts of S. dulcis was appraised through investigating their DPPH reduction against the positive control (L-ascorbic acid). DPPH radical loses its chromophore upon receiving proton from hydrogen donor. Consequently, increased concentration of phenolic compounds or number of hydroxyl group on aromatic ring boosts DPPH radical scavenging activity[46],[47]. The antioxidative as well as the scavenging potential of extract is directly proportional to the DPPH reduction.The more antioxidants found in extract, the more DPPH reduction will occur. Higher DPPH reduction is associated with greater scavenging potential. Since all extracts showed dose dependent DPPH scavenging activity, these extracts may exert more pronounced and significant free radical scavenging activity. The antioxidant potential of the extracts measured by DPPH scavenging method was also expressed as 50% inhibitory concentration, IC50 values. Methanol fruit extract was found to have the lowest IC50 value among the other extracts. The result of our study indicates a strong relationship between phenolic content and DPPH scavenging as well as antioxidant activities, suggesting that the phenolic compounds are probably responsible for the antioxidant activity of S. dulcis.
The reducing potential of a compound or plant may serve as a remarkable indicator of its potential antioxidant activity. According to the report of Seddik et al., reducing potential of tannins inhibits the formation of liver peroxides, thereby prevents liver injury[48]. Like DPPH scavenging activity, the reducing potential of the sample was found to be dose dependent. Higher dose exerts greater reducing potential. The antioxidant potential of the extracts measured by reducing assay was also expressed as 50% effective concentration, EC50 values. Like DPPH scavenging activity, methanol fruit extract was found to have the lowest EC50 value among the other extracts.
The results of total antioxidant capacity were correlated with the phenolic contents. Methanol fruit extract was found to exert the greatest total antioxidant capacity which harmonized the results of total phenolic content of our study. The results of our study are also consistent with the outcomes of many research groups who reported positive correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity[49]–[51]. In our test, all extracts showed a higher correlation between phenolic content and antioxidant activity with a R2 range of 0.937 7-0.996 7. According to the report of Ronald et al., antioxidant activity in DPPH and phosphomolybdenum assay may be exerted through either hydrogen atom transfer or single electron transfer mechanism[52].
Since plants are rich in various types of secondary metabolites including tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids and flavonoid, they have been found to exert in vitro antimicrobial property[53]. In our study, antimicrobial activity of various fruit and leaf extracts of S. dulcis is evaluated by disc diffusion method. Two different doses of extracts were used in the test and compared with the positive control. In our study, methanol fruit extract and dichloromethane leaf extract don't exhibit any activity against S. cerevacae. All extracts showed dose dependent activity. Nevertheless, the inhibition zone produced by the commercially available positive control was larger than those produced by the extracts. The presence of very minute concentrations of bioactive compounds in the plant extract may contribute to the poor antimicrobial activity[54]. However, the plant extracts were found to be effective against both bacteria (Gram-positive and Gram-negative) and fungi. This sort of activity gives an indication of the presence of antimicrobial compounds with broad spectrum or simply general metabolic toxins[55]. Therefore, extracts of S. dulcis may be helpful in finding antimicrobial compounds.
Since any compound or extract can exert antimicrobial and antioxidant activity as a result of its toxic effects on the cells, determination of the toxic effect of antimicrobial and antioxidant agents on host cell is mandatory[56]. For this purpose, brine shrimp lethality test was performed. The results observed in 24 h were found to be dose dependent for all extracts. Any extract or pure compound is considered as a potential cytotoxic and toxic substance only if LC50 is less than 1 000 µg/mL[57],[58].
Thrombolytic activity of two different parts (the fruit and leaf) of S. dulcis was measured and compared with streptokinase (the positive control) and sterile distilled water (the negative control). In the study, chloroform fruit extract was found to provide the maximum thrombolytic activity. However, the percentage of clot lysis produced by the commercially available positive control was far greater than those produced by the extracts. The presence of minor amount of bioactive thrombolytic compound in the extracts may contribute to the weak result. All extracts exhibited statistically significant thrombolytic activity (P<0.001).
In conclusion, the current study illustrates the fruit and leaf of S. dulcis should be regarded as a valuable source of material for human health, as an antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic agent. Further studies are desirable to characterize and isolate the unknown underlying components in order to establish their pharmacological properties which could provide valuable lead compounds in the respective therapeutic area.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the authority of East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh for providing facilities. The research was funded by the Department of Pharmacy of East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Grant No. PHRM 404, SPRING 2011).
Comments
Background
In spite of the great advances observed in modern medicine, plants still make an important contribution to health care. Due to the adverse effects of synthetic agents, search for alternative herbal medicine is required. Thus, emphasis is now given on the screening of biological activities of medicinal plants.
Research frontiers
The present study demonstrates potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic activities of fruit and leaves extracts of S. dulcis and assessed by different biochemical parameters, disc diffusion methods, brine shrimp lethality bioassay and in vitro clot lysis model.
Related reports
DPPH radicals have been widely used to evaluate antioxidant properties. Brine shrimp lethality bioassay is a rapid bioassay indicating cytotoxicity while clot lysis model is a simple technique evaluating thrombolytic activity. Medicinal plants, rich in bioactive compounds including phenolics, terpenoids, alkaloids and flavonoid, have been found to possess antioxidant, cytotoxic, antimicrobial property.
Innovations and breakthroughs
S. dulcis is used in eye infections, itchiness, internal ulceration, sore throat and inflammation. In the present research, authors have demonstrated the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic potential of various fruit and leaves extracts of S. dulcis which could provide valuable lead compounds in the respective therapeutic area.
Applications
The results of the study illustrate that fruit and leaf of S. dulcis should be regarded as a valuable source of material for human health, as an antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic agent. The results justify the traditional use of the plant in the treatment of infectious disease.
Peer review
This is a good study in which authors investigated the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and thrombolytic property of the fruits and leaves of S. dulcis using different in vitro biochemical analysis, disc diffusion methods and in vivo bioassay etc. The methanolic fruit extracts of the plant exhibited the most promising results and might be a potential source of lead compounds for aforementioned bioactivities.
Footnotes
Foundation Project: Supported by the Department of Pharmacy of East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Grant No. PHRM 404, SPRING 2011).
Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Rai PK, Jaiswal D, Singh RK, Gupta RK, Watal G. Glycemic properties of Trichosanthes dioica leaves. Pharm Biol. 2008;46(12):894–899. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jia N, Xiong YL, Kong B, Liu Q, Xia X. Radical scavenging activity of black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) extract and its inhibitory effect on gastric cancer cell proliferation via induction of apoptosis. J Funct Foods. 2012;4(1):382–390. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nirmala P, Ramanathan M. Effect of kaempferol on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine induced colorectal carcinoma in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;654(1):75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu JF, Ma Y, Wang Y, Du ZY, Shen JK, Peng HL. Reduction of lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells by luteolin is associated with activation of AMPK and mitigation of oxidative stress. Phytother Res. 2011;25(4):588–596. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suh Y, Afaq F, Johnson JJ, Mukhtar H. A plant flavonoid fisetin induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells by inhibition of COX2 and Wnt/EGFR/NFkappaB signaling pathways. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(2):300–307. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weng CJ, Yen GC. Chemopreventive effects of dietary phytochemicals against cancer invasion and metastasis: Phenolic acids, monophenol, polyphenol, and their derivatives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38(1):76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stokes Z, Chan S. Principles of cancer treatment by hormone therapy. Surgery. 2009;27(4):165–168. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moon DO, Kim MO, Kang SH, Choi YH, Kim GY. Sulforaphane suppresses TNF-α mediated activation of NF-κB and induces apoptosis through activation of reactive oxygen species dependent caspase-3. Cancer Lett. 2009;274(1):132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Androutsopoulos VP, Papakyriakou A, Vourloumis D, Tsatsakis AM, Spandidos DA. Dietary flavonoids in cancer therapy and prevention: Substrates and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 CYP1 enzymes. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;126(1):9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Man S, Gao W, Zhang Y, Huang L, Liu C. Chemical study and medical application of saponins as anti-cancer agents. Fitoterapia. 2010;81(7):703–714. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shahwar D, Raza MA. Antioxidant potential of phenolic extracts of Mimusops elengi. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(7):547–550. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60094-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Esam HM, Ali HK. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of some plant extracts and their application to ground beef patties. Food Chem. 2000;69(2):135–141. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aliero A, Aliero BL, Buhari U. Preliminary phytochemical and antibacterial screening of Scadoxus multiflorus. Int J Pure Appl Sci. 2008;2(4):13–17. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nebedum J, Ajeigbe K, Nwobodo E, Uba C, Adesanya O, Fadare O, et al. et al. Comparative study of the ethanolic extracts of four Nigerian plants against some pathogenic microorganisms. Res J Med Plant. 2009;3:23–28. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacquelyn GB. Microbiology: principles and exploration. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Firdaus M, Prihanto AA, Nurdiani R. Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of Acanthus ilicifolius flower. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60017-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang S, Meckling KA, Marcone MF, Kakuda Y, Tsao R. Can phytochemical antioxidant rich foods act as anti-cancer agents? Food Res Int. 2011;44(9):2545–2554. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kalaivani T, Rajasekaran C, Mathew L. Free radical scavenging, cytotoxic, and hemolytic activities of an active antioxidant compound ethyl gallate from leaves of Acacia nilotica (L.) Wild. Ex. Delile subsp. indica (Benth.) Brenan. J Food Sci. 2011;76(6):144–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murugan RS, Priyadarsini RV, Ramalingam K, Hara Y, Karunagaran D, Nagini S. Intrinsic apoptosis and NF-κB signaling are potential molecular targets for chemoprevention by black tea polyphenols in HepG2 cells in vitro and in a rat hepatocarcinogenesis model in vivo. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:3281–3287. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Suganuma M, Saha A, Fujiki H. New cancer treatment strategy using combination of green tea catechins and anticancer drugs. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(2):317–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Morshed H, Sayeed MS, Mostofa AG, Islam MS, Parvin S. Antithrombolytic and antidiabetic activity of methanolic extract of Paederia foetida. Pharmacogn J. 2012;4(30):30–33. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khan IN, Sarker MI, Mamun AA, Mazumder K, Bhuiya MA, Mannan A. Cytotoxic and thrombolytic activity of ethanolic extract of Zanthoxylum budrunga (Fam: Rutaceae) leaves. Eur J Sci Res. 2011;66(2):303–310. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khan IN, Habib MR, Rahman MM, Mannan A, Sarker MM, Hawlader S. Thrombolytic potential of Ocimum sanctum L., Curcuma longa L., Azadirachta indica L. and Anacardium occidentale L. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2011;2(3):125–127. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morton JF. Fruits of warm climates. Miami: Florida Flair Books; 1987. pp. 240–242. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rahmatullah M, Ferdausi D, Mollik MA, Azam MN, Rahman MT, Jahan R. Ethnomedical survey of bheramara area in Kushtia district, Bangladesh. Am-Euras J Sustain Agric. 2009;3:534–541. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wiart C. Medicinal plants of Asia and the Pacific. New York: CRC Press; 2006. p. 179. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sarker MM, Nimmi I, Kawsar MH. Preliminary screening of six popular fruits of Bangladesh for in vitro IgM production and proliferation of splenocytes. Bangladesh Pharm J. 2012;15(1):31–37. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jantan N. In vitro antidiabetic of Cemumar (Micromelum pubescens), Tebengau (Ehretia laevis) and Kedondong (Spondias dulcis) leaves extract. Malaysia: School of Bioprocess Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kokate CK. Pharmacognosy. 16th ed. Mumbai: Nirali Prakasham; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall Int; 1998. pp. 4–8. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sofowara A. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. Nigeria: Spectrum Books Ltd; 1993. p. 289. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Amin I, Zamaliah MM, Chin WF. Total antioxidant activity and phenolic content in selected vegetables. Food Chem. 2004;87(4):581–586. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang C, Yang M, Wen H, Chern J. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10(3):178–182. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Desmarchelier C, Repetto M, Coussio J, Liesuy S, Ciccia G. Antioxidant and prooxidant activities in aqueous extracts of Argentine plants. Int J Pharmacogn. 1997;35(2):116–120. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucoseamine. Jpn J Nutr. 1986;44:307–315. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huda-Faujan N, Noriham A, Norrakiah AS, Babji AS. Antioxidant activity of plants methanolic extracts containing phenolic compounds. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(3):484–489. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bauer AN, Kirby WM, Sherries JC, Truck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hossain MS, Hossain MA, Islam R, Alam AH, Zahan K, Sarkar S, et al. et al. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of 2-aminobenzoic acid and 2-aminophenol and their coordination complexes with Magnesium (Mg-II) Pak J Biol Sci. 2004;7(1):25–27. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Islam MA, Sayeed MA, Islam MA, Khan GR, Mosaddik MA, Bhuyan MS. Terpenes from bark of Zanthoxylum budrunga and their cytotoxic activities. Rev Latinoamer Quím. 2002;30(1):24–28. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Prasad S, Daginawala HF, Kashyap RS, Deopujari JY, Purohit HJ, Taori GM. Development of an in vitro model to study clot lysis activity of thrombolytic drugs. Thromb J. 2006;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-4-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Patel DK, Kumar R, Prasad SK, Sairam K, Hemalatha S. Antidiabetic and in vitro antioxidant potential of Hybanthus enneaspermus linn f. muell in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(4):316–322. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60051-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thirumalai T, Viviyan TS, Elumalai EK, David E. Hypolipidaemic and antioxidant effect of Enicostemma littorale Blume. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(5):381–385. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60084-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stanojević L, Stanković M, Nikolić V, Nikolić L, Ristić D, Tumbas V, et al. et al. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Hieracium pilosella L. Sensors (Basel) 2009;9(7):5702–5714. doi: 10.3390/s90705702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mahesh CM, Vidya P. Isolation and identification of flavonoid “quercetin” from Citrullus colocynthis (Linn.) Schrad. Asian J Exp Sci. 2008;22(1):137–142. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dai J, Mumper RJ. Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties. Molecules. 2010;15(10):7313–7352. doi: 10.3390/molecules15107313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miguel MG. Antioxidant activity of medicinal and aromatic plants. Flavour Fragr J. 2010;25(5):291–312. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shahwar D, Raza MA, Toqir A, Viqar UA. Microbial transformation of vanillin isolated from Melia azedarach to vanillyl alcohol followed by protease inhibition and antioxidant activity. J Chem Soc Pak. 2011;33(5):715–719. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Khennouf S, Amira S, Arrar L, Baghiani A. Effect of some phenolic compounds and quercus tannins on lipid peroxidation. World Appl Sci J. 2010;8(9):1144–1149. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Muhammad ZQ, Faraz AR, Rukhsana K, Durre S, Raza MA. In vitro antioxidant potential of aqueous and organic extracts of Clematis connata. Asian J Chem. 2011;23(9):4017–4020. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shahwar D, Raza MA, Saeed A, Riasat M, Chatta FI, Javaid M, et al. et al. Antioxidant potential of the extracts of Putranjiva roxburghii, Conyza bonariensis, Woodfordia fruiticosa and Senecio chrysanthemoids. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(18):4288–4295. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zheng W, Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(1):5165–5170. doi: 10.1021/jf010697n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4290–4302. doi: 10.1021/jf0502698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Saad S, Taher M, Susanti D, Qaralleh H, Awang AF. In vitro antimicrobial activity of mangrove plant Sonneratia alba. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(6):427–429. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60069-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rahman MA, Islam MS. Antioxidant, antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of the phytochemicals of whole Leucas aspera extract. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(4):273–279. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60062-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mohammed AA, Khalil AA, El-Beltagi HE. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of kaff maryam (Anastatica hierochuntica) and doum palm (Hyphaene thebaica) Grases y Aceites. 2010;61(1):67–75. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chew AL, Jessica JJ, Sasidharan S. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of different parts of Leucas aspera. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(3):176–180. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60037-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.da Costa JG, Campos AR, Brito SA, Pereira CK, Souza EO, Rodrigues FF. Biological screening of araripe basin medicinal plants using Artemia salina Leach and pathogenic bacteria. Pharmacogn Mag. 2010;6(24):331–334. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.71792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Spavieri J, Allmendinger A, Kaiser M, Casey R, Hingley-Wilson S, Lalvani A, et al. et al. Antimycobacterial, antiprotozoal, and cytotoxic potential of twenty-one brown algae (Phaeophyceae) from British and Irish waters. Phytother Res. 2010;24(11):1724–1729. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]