Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2013 Mar 15;43(5):1147–1152. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243187

The Protein Kinase PKR is Critical for LPS-induced iNOS Production, but Dispensable for Inflammasome Activation in Macrophages

Yuan He 1, Luigi Franchi 1, Gabriel Núñez 1,*
PMCID: PMC3757543  NIHMSID: NIHMS502299  PMID: 23401008

Abstract

The inflammasomes are multi-protein platforms that drive the activation of caspase-1 leading to the processing and secretion of biologically active IL-1β and IL-18. Different inflammasomes including NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2 are activated and assembled in response to distinct microbial or endogenous stimuli. However, the mechanisms by which upstream stimuli trigger inflammasome activation remain poorly understood. PKR, a protein kinase activated by viral infection, has been recently shown to be required for activation of the inflammasomes. Using macrophages from two different mouse strains deficient in PKR, we found that PKR is important for the induction of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). However, PKR was dispensable for caspase-1 activation, processing of pro-IL-1β/IL-18 and secretion of IL-1β induced by stimuli that trigger the activation of NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2. These results indicate that PKR is not required for inflammasome activation in macrophages.

Keywords: Caspase-1, IL-1β, Inflammasome, Macrophages, PKR

Introduction

PKR, known as double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase, is activated by viral infection and plays an important role in controlling viral spreading within the host [1, 2]. PKR contains an N-terminal dsRNA binding domain and a C-terminal kinase domain [3]. After activation by binding to viral dsRNA, PKR phosphorylates the translation initiation factor EIF2A to inhibit cellular RNA translation leading to inhibition of viral protein synthesis [1]. PKR can also modulate NF-κB signaling and cellular apoptosis [4, 5]. In addition, stimulation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) can trigger PKR-mediated apoptosis of macrophages, which allow some pathogens such as Bacillus anthracis to escape immune clearance [6]. PKR can also link pathogen sensing to stress responses in metabolic disease [7]. Notably, PKR has been recently implicated in the processing of caspase-1 and IL-1β secretion in response to diverse stimuli [8], suggesting that this kinase acts in a common step required for inflammasome activation.

Inflammasomes are intracellular multi-protein complexes that drive the activation of the protease caspase-1 [9, 10]. To date, four bona fide inflammasomes have been identified, NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2, that link specific microbial or endogenous stimuli to caspase-1 activation [9, 10]. Once activated, caspase-1 proteolytically cleaves pro-IL1β and pro-IL-18 into their biologically active cytokines [11]. Although there is clear evidence that the activation mechanism of each inflammasome is different [911], a recent study reported that PKR is required for the activation of NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2 [8]. The latter study suggested that PKR is a common regulator of the inflammasomes. To further understand the role of PKR in caspase-1 activation, we studied the activation of the NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2 in macrophages from mice deficient in PKR. In contrast to published results [8], we found that PKR is dispensable for inflammasome activation.

Results and Discussion

PKR is critical for LPS-induced iNOS production in macrophages

PKR is phosphorylated in macrophages after LPS stimulation [6, 12]. To determine the potential role of PKR in the TLR4 signaling pathway, we treated bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Pkr+/− and Pkr−/− mice with LPS for different times, and analyzed the phosphorylation status of IκBα, ERK and p38 (Fig. 1A). The phosphorylation levels of these proteins was indistinguishable in LPS-stimulated Pkr+/− and Pkr−/− macrophages, suggesting that PKR protein is not required for NF-κB, ERK and p38 activation in response to LPS. Notably, the production of inducible nitric oxidase synthase (iNOS), an enzyme catalyzing nitric oxide which is involved in host defense against microbes [13], was markedly reduced in Pkr−/− macrophages when compared to that of Pkr+/− macrophages (Fig. 1B). Several transcription factors, including NF-κB, AP-1 and STAT1, have been shown to regulate iNOS expression [13]. LPS-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 at Tyr 701, a site essential for its activation, was not altered by PKR deficiency, indicating that it is unlikely that PKR is involved in the upstream signaling pathway of STAT1 activation (Fig. 1C). Consistent with the reduction of iNOS expression, the bacteria-killing capacity after exposure to E. coli was reduced in Pkr−/− macrophages (Fig. 1D). Our results confirm and extend previous findings that PKR plays a role in LPS-induced iNOS production and bacteria-killing function of macrophages.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PKR is critical for LPS-induced iNOS production in macrophages. (A) BMDMs from heterozygous (Pkr+/−) and homozygous (Pkr−/−) mice were stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for indicated time. Cell extracts were immunoblotted with antibodies reacting with phosphorylated forms of IκBα, p38 or ERK. The immunoblots were stripped and re-probed for total IκBα, p38 or ERK. Probing for PKR protein confirmed the genotype of Pkr−/−. (B) BMDMs were stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for indicated time. Cell lysates were immublotted for iNOS and PKR. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) BMDMs were stimulated with 100 ng/ml of LPS for indicated time. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for STAT1 and p-STAT1 (Tyr701). β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) Live intracellular bacteria from BMDMs after indicated time of infection with E. coli. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments. *, p<0.05.

PKR is dispensable for inflammasome activation in macrophages

Next, we investigated the involvement of PKR in inflammasome activation. LPS-primed Pkr+/− and Pkr−/− macrophages were treated with known activators of NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2. In contrast to a recent report [8], the amounts of processed caspase-1 (p20 and p10), and IL-1β/IL-18 maturation in the cell supernatant in response to activators of NLRP3 including ATP, nigerin and silica particles were comparable in Pkr+/− and Pkr−/− macrophages (Fig. 2A). No role for PKR was also found in the activation of caspase-1 and pro-IL-1β/IL-18 processing after infection of macrophages with Salmonella thyphimurium that activates the NLRC4 inflammasome (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, caspase-1 activation and IL-1β processing induced by poly (dA:dT) that triggers AIM2 activation [1416], was comparable in Pkr+/− and Pkr+/− macrophages (Fig. 2C). ELISA analysis showed robust IL-1β release in Pkr−/− macrophages after stimulation with ATP, Salmonella and poly (dA:dT), although the amounts were slightly reduced in Pkr−/− macrophages when compared to Pkr+/− macrophages (Fig. 2D). However, similar reduction was observed in TNF-α secretion (Fig. 2E), suggesting that the slight reduction in IL-1β secretion in Pkr−/− macrophages is not related to inflammasome activation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PKR deficient BMDMs show normal inflammasome activation. (A) BMDMs were un-stimulated (UT), or primed with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 4 h before stimulated with NLRP3 activators, ATP (5mM) for 30 minutes, Nigericin (5 µM) for 1 h, Silica (500 µg/ml) for 6 h. (B) BMDMs were primed with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 4 h, followed by infection with Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhi., MOI=10) for 1 h, or left uninfected. (C) LPS primed BMDMs were stimulated with 2 µg/ml poly (dA:dT) for 6 h or left unstimulated. After stimulation or infection, supernatant (Sup.) and cell lysates (Lys.) were prepared and immunoblotted for indicated proteins. Secretion of IL-1β (E) and TNF-α (F) from BMDMs was analyzed after inflammasome activation. Data are the mean ± s.d. of triplicate wells and representative of three independent experiments.

Our initial studies were performed with PKR deficient mice in which the N-terminal RNA binding domain of PKR was deleted [17]. In contrast, Lu et al. studied PKR using knockout mice with deletion of the catalytic domain of PKR [18]. Although both knockout mice lack expression of full-length PKR, some conflicting results have been reported for these two mouse mutant strains [19]. Therefore, we also studied inflammasome activation in macrophages from mutant mice with deletion of the catalytic domain of PKR. Analysis of macrophages from this Pkr−/− mouse strain also revealed comparable caspase-1 activation and pro-IL-1β/IL-18 processing in response to activators of the NLRP3 inflammasome when compared to wild-type macrophages (Fig. 3A). As expected, caspase-1 activation and pro-IL-1β/IL-18 procession were abrogated in macrophages from Nlrp3−/− mice (Fig. 3A). Likewise, caspase-1 activation and pro-IL-1β maturation induced by aluminum salts (Alum), another activator of NLRP3, were unimpaired in Pkr−/− macropages, but abolished in Nlrp3−/− macrophages (Fig. 3B). 2-aminopurin (2-AP), a potent inhibitor of PKR, was reported to inhibit ATP-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation at millimolar concentration [8]. Notably, addition of 2-AP at this high concentration inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by ATP in both wild-type and PKR-deficient macrophages (Fig. 3C). This result suggests at this high concentration, 2-AP inhibits the inflammasome through off-target effects. Furthermore, caspase-1 activation in response to Salmonella or poly (dA:dT) were unaffected by deletion of the catalytic domain of PKR (Fig. 3D and E). Consistent with these results, IL-1β and TNF-α release induced by ATP, Salmonella and poly (dA:dT) were unimpaired in Pkr−/− macrophages (Fig. 3F and G).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Inflammasome activation was analyzed in BMDMs with targeted deletion of the catalytic domain of PKR. (A) and (B) BMDMs from wild-type (WT) mice, Pkr−/− mice and Nlrp3−/− mice were primed with LPS (500 ng/ml) for 4 h before stimulated with NLRP3 activators, ATP (5 mM) for 30 minutes, Nigericin (5 µM) for 1 h, Silica (U.S. Silica, 500 µg/ml) or Alum (500 µg/ml) for 6 h. (C) LPS-primed BMDMs from wild-type (WT) mice and Pkr−/− mice were pretreated with 1mM 2-aminopurin (2-AP) or PBS (control) for 30 minutes before stimulation with 5 mM ATP for 30 minutes. (D) LPS primed BMDMs were infected with Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhi., MOI=10) for 1 h, or uninfected. Caspase-1 cleavage was analyzed by immunoblotting. (E) LPS-primed BMDMs were stimulated with 2 µg/ml poly (dA:dT) for 6 h or left unstimulated. After stimulation, supernatant (Sup.) and cell lysates (Lys.) were prepared and immunoblotted for indicated proteins. Secretion of IL-1β (F) and TNF-α (G) from BMDMs was measured after inflammasome activation. Data are the mean ± s.d. of triplicate wells and representative of three independent experiments.

Concluding remarks

Our results indicate that the protein kinase PKR plays a critical role in regulating iNOS production by macrophages after LPS challenge, which correlated with reduced intracellular killing of E. coli. However, we found no detectable role for PKR in the activation of the NLRP3, NLRC4 or AIM2 inflammasomes in macrophages. We do not have a clear explanation for the difference in results between our studies and those of Lu et al. [8]. It is possible that subtle variation in experimental conditions may account, at least in part, for the differences in results. In our studies, parallel experiments were performed using macrophages from mice deficient in NLRP3 and NLRC4 that showed requirement for these inflammasomes, but not PKR, for caspase-1 activation triggered by specific stimuli. In addition, our conclusions regarding PKR were obtained from experiments using two independently generated PKR deficient mice that targeted two critical regions of PKR. Additional studies are needed to clarify the role of PKR in inflammasome activation.

Materials and Methods

Mice and cells

Wild type (WT) and Nlrp3 deficient mice have been described previously [20]. Two different types of PKR targeted mutations have been reported in mice, targeted deletion of the PKR RNA-binding domain and targeted deletion of PKR catalytic domain [17, 18]. Leg bones of Pkr+/− and Pkr−/− mice with targeted deletion of the RNA-binding domain of PKR, which were originally generated from on a mixed 129 SvEv×C57Bl6 background and backcrossed to C57BL/6 one time [21], were a gift of Randal Kaufman (Sanford-Burham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla). Leg bones of Pkr−/− mice with targeted deletion of the catalytic domain of PKR were generated on a 129Sv background and backcrossed to BALB/c mice at least six times (a gift of Yingjie Chen, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis). BMDMs were prepared and cultured as previously described [22]. Cells were seeded overnight in 12-well plate with 1×106 cells per well.

Reagents

Ultrapure LPS from E. coli 0111:B4, Alum, 2-aminopurin (2-AP) and poly(dA:dT)/lyovec were purchased from Invivogen. ATP was purchased from sigma. Nigericin was purchased from Calbiochem. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium strain SL1344 was a gift from Denise Monack (Stanford University, Stanford, California). Antibodies for IκBα, p-IκBα, p38, p-p38, Erk, p-Erk, iNOS, STAT1 and p-STAT1 (Tyr 701) were purchased from Cell Signaling. Murine IL-1β antibody (AF-401-NA) was purchased from R&D Systems. Actin antibody was purchased from GenScript. Antibodies for PKR (sc-6282) and caspase-1 (sc-514) were purchased from Santa Cruz. Caspase-1 antibody for the cleaved p20 of caspase-1 was generated in our laboratory. IL-18 antibody (5180R-100) was purchased from BioVision. Rabbit anti mouse-Nlrp3 antibody was generated by immunizing rabbits with mouse Nlrp3 protein (amino acids 1–194) expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography using a nickel column.

Bacteria-killing assay

BMDMs were incubated with E. coli strain at MOI of 10 for 30 minutes. Extracellular bacteria were killed by treatment with gentamicin (100 µg/ml) for 15 minutes. At indicated time points, cells were lysed with 0.1% Trinton X-100 and serial dilutions of cell extract were spread on LB agar plates. Live intracellular bacteria were counted after overnight incubation in 37°C.

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in ice-cold PBS buffer containing 1% NP-40 supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The proteins from cell-free supernatants were precipitated by choloform/methanol method as previously described [23]. Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes by electroblotting (Bio-Rad) and membranes were immunoblotted with respective antibodies.

Measurements of cytokines

Mouse IL-1β and TNF-α in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA kits (R&D Systems). Assays were performed in triplicate for each independent experiment.

Statistical analysis

Student’s t test was used to determine statistically significant difference between two groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants R01AI063331 and R01DK091191 from the National Institutes of Health. L. F. was supported by a Research Career Development Award from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America. We would like to thank Randal Kaufman and Yingjie Chen for Pkr−/− mouse femurs. We would also like to thank Peter Kuffa for help in generating anti-Nlrp3 antibody and Sharon Koonse for animal husbandry.

Abbreviations used in this paper

PKR

double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase

BMDMs

bone marrow derived macrophages

NLRP3

NOD-like receptor (NLR) family pyrin domain-containing 3

NLRC4

NLR caspase-recruitment domain-containing 4

AIM2

absent in melanoma 2

Footnotes

Disclosures

Luigi Franchi is an employee of Lycera, a biotechnology company specializing in the field of inflammation.

References

  • 1.Garcia MA, et al. Impact of protein kinase PKR in cell biology: from antiviral to antiproliferative action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(4):1032–1060. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00027-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Williams BR. PKR; a sentinel kinase for cellular stress. Oncogene. 1999;18(45):6112–6120. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCormack SJ, Thomis DC, Samuel CE. Mechanism of interferon action: identification of a RNA binding domain within the N-terminal region of the human RNA-dependent P1/eIF-2 alpha protein kinase. Virology. 1992;188(1):47–56. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90733-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takizawa T, Tatematsu C, Nakanishi Y. Double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase interacts with apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1. Implications for apoptosis signaling pathways. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269(24):6126–6132. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takada Y, et al. Genetic deletion of PKR abrogates TNF-induced activation of IkappaBalpha kinase, JNK, Akt and cell proliferation but potentiates p44/p42 MAPK and p38 MAPK activation. Oncogene. 2007;26(8):1201–1212. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hsu LC, et al. The protein kinase PKR is required for macrophage apoptosis after activation of Toll-like receptor 4. Nature. 2004;428(6980):341–345. doi: 10.1038/nature02405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakamura T, et al. Double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase links pathogen sensing with stress and metabolic homeostasis. Cell. 2010;140(3):338–348. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lu B, et al. Novel role of PKR in inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release. Nature. 2012;488(7413):670–674. doi: 10.1038/nature11290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R, Nunez G. Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):325–332. doi: 10.1038/ni.2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rathinam VA, Vanaja SK, Fitzgerald KA. Regulation of inflammasome signaling. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):333–342. doi: 10.1038/ni.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schroder K, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140(6):821–832. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cabanski M, et al. PKR regulates TLR2/TLR4-dependent signaling in murine alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;38(1):26–31. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0010OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bogdan C. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(10):907–916. doi: 10.1038/ni1001-907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burckstummer T, et al. An orthogonal proteomic-genomic screen identifies AIM2 as a cytoplasmic DNA sensor for the inflammasome. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(3):266–272. doi: 10.1038/ni.1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fernandes-Alnemri T, et al. AIM2 activates the inflammasome and cell death in response to cytoplasmic DNA. Nature. 2009;458(7237):509–513. doi: 10.1038/nature07710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hornung V, et al. AIM2 recognizes cytosolic dsDNA and forms a caspase-1-activating inflammasome with ASC. Nature. 2009;458(7237):514–518. doi: 10.1038/nature07725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang YL, et al. Deficient signaling in mice devoid of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J. 1995;14(24):6095–6106. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00300.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abraham N, et al. Characterization of transgenic mice with targeted disruption of the catalytic domain of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(9):5953–5962. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baltzis D, Li S, Koromilas AE. Functional characterization of pkr gene products expressed in cells from mice with a targeted deletion of the N terminus or C terminus domain of PKR. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(41):38364–38372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203564200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kanneganti TD, et al. Bacterial RNA and small antiviral compounds activate caspase-1 through cryopyrin/Nalp3. Nature. 2006;440(7081):233–236. doi: 10.1038/nature04517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scheuner D, et al. The double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase mediates viral-induced encephalitis. Virology. 2003;317(2):263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Franchi L, Eigenbrod T, Nunez G. Cutting edge: TNF-alpha mediates sensitization to ATP and silica via the NLRP3 inflammasome in the absence of microbial stimulation. J Immunol. 2009;183(2):792–796. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shi CS, et al. Activation of autophagy by inflammatory signals limits IL-1beta production by targeting ubiquitinated inflammasomes for destruction. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(3):255–263. doi: 10.1038/ni.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES