Abstract
Leptin action in the brain signals the repletion of adipose energy stores, suppressing feeding and permitting energy expenditure on a variety of processes, including reproduction. Leptin binding to its receptor (LepR-b) promotes the tyrosine phosphorylation of three sites on LepR-b, each of which mediates distinct downstream signals. While the signals mediated by LepR-b Tyr1138 and Tyr985 control important aspects of energy homeostasis and LepR-b signal attenuation, respectively, the role of the remaining LepR-b phosphorylation site (Tyr1077) in leptin action has not been studied. To examine the function of Tyr1077, we generated a “knock-in” mouse model expressing LepR-b F1077, which is mutant for LepR-b Tyr1077. Mice expressing LepR-b F1077 demonstrate modestly increased body weight and adiposity. Furthermore, females display impairments in estrous cycling. Our results suggest that signaling by LepR-b Tyr1077 plays a modest role in the control of metabolism by leptin, and is an important link between body adiposity and the reproductive axis.
Abbreviations: AgRP, agouti-related peptide; ARC, arcuate nucleus; BAT, brown adipose tissue; HD, high-fat diet; IVGTT, intravenous glucose tolerance test; Kiss, kisspeptin; LepR-b, leptin receptor; NC, normal chow; NPY, neuropeptide Y; PMv, ventral premammilary nucleus; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; STAT5, signal transducer and activator of transcription-5; TAC2, tachykinin-2; WAT, white adipose tissue
Keywords: Leptin, STAT5, Obesity, Tyrosine phosphorylation, Reproduction, Estrus
1. Introduction
Adipose tissue produces the hormone, leptin, in proportion to fat stores to communicate the status of long-term energy reserves to the brain and other organ systems [1,2]. In addition to suppressing food intake, adequate leptin levels permit the expenditure of energy on numerous processes, including growth and reproduction and a variety of parameters that affect metabolic rate. Conversely, lack of leptin action due to null mutations of leptin (e.g., Lepob/ob mice) or the leptin receptor (LepR) (e.g., Leprdb/db mice) results in increased food intake in combination with reduced energy expenditure (and thus obesity) and neuroendocrine dysfunction (including infertility) [3,4]. Many of the effects of leptin are attributable to effects in the CNS, particularly in the hypothalamus [5,6].
Alternative splicing generates several LepR isoforms that possess identical extracellular, transmembrane, and membrane-proximal intracellular domains [7]. The “long” (LepR-b) isoform contains a 300 amino acid intracellular tail and is required to mediate physiologic leptin action [3,6]. LepR-b, like other Type I cytokine receptors, mediates intracellular signaling via an associated Jak family tyrosine kinase [8,9]. Leptin promotes the autophosphorylation and activation of LepR-b-associated Jak2, which phosphorylates three LepR-b tyrosine residues (Tyr985, Tyr1077 and Tyr1138) [8–10]. While Jak2 tyrosine kinase activity is required for LepR-b signaling, Jak2 itself is insufficient to mediate most leptin action, as mice expressing a LepR-b mutant (LepR-bΔ65) that binds and activates Jak2, but which lacks tyrosine phoshorylation sites and other intracellular LepR-b motifs, largely phenocopy LepR-b-deficient Leprdb/db mice [11]. Thus, LepR-b tyrosine phosphorylation sites are crucial for physiologic leptin action.
Each LepR-b tyrosine phosphorylation site recruits specific SH2 domain-containing effector proteins: Tyr985 recruits SHP2 and SOCS3, and attenuates LepR-b signaling, but does not appear to mediate other aspects of metabolic and neuroendocrine control by leptin in vivo [12–15]. Tyr1077 plays a dominant role in activating the latent transcription factor, signal transducer and activator of transcription- (STAT)-5, and Tyr1138 controls STAT3 [10,16]. Mice expressing a LepR-b mutant for Tyr1138 exhibit hyperphagic obesity with decreased energy expenditure that is only slightly less dramatic than that observed in Leprdb/db mice; dysregulation of the thyroid and adrenal axes in Tyr1138 mutant mice is similar to that observed in Leprdb/db animals [17–20]. In contrast to the absolute infertility of Leprdb/db mice, however, reproductive function is relatively preserved in Tyr1138 mutant mice. These results predict that signaling via LepR-b Tyr1077 may modestly impact energy balance (e.g., to account for the slight differences seen in body weight regulation between LepR-b Tyr1138 mutants and Leprdb/db mice), but that LepR-b Tyr1077 might serve an as important mechanism by which leptin modulates reproductive function.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Reagents
Leptin was the generous gift of Amylin Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA). High fat diet (45% Kcal fat) chow was from Research Diets, NJ. Rabbit anti-pSTAT3 (Y709) was purchased from Cell Signaling (Boston, MA), and donkey serum was from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). Donkey anti-rabbit Alexa-488 conjugated antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). All other immunohistochemical supplies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
2.2. Animals
Animals were bred in our colony in the Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine (ULAM) at the University of Michigan and handled in accordance with The University Committee on Use and Care of Animals (UCUCA).
2.3. 2.3 Generation of Leprf1077 mice
We modified our previous Lepr targeting vector in the pPNTLox backbone [11,14,17,21] to include the mutation encoding the Tyr1077→Phe1077 substitution. The construct was electroporated into R1 embryonic stem (ES) cells, which were selected as described [11,21]. Clones were analyzed by qPCR and confirmed by Southern blotting [22]; the presence of the substitution mutation was confirmed by a site-specific Taqman PCR allelic discrimination assay. Correctly targeted ES cells clones carrying the desired substitution were used to produce chimeric animals, which were crossed with C57Bl/6J mice to generate germline LeprF1077/+ (Leprtm5Mgmj) mice. Subsequent genotyping was by qPCR allelic discrimination assay. The resultant LeprF1077/+ animals were bred to C57Bl/6J mice for 2 generations before interbreeding of heterozygous (LeprF1077/+) animals to produce homozygous (LeprF1077/F1077; f/f) and wild-type (Lepr+/+) mice for study. Animals were backcrossed to C57Bl/6J for≥6 generations prior to interbreeding to produce animals for the analysis of glucose homeostasis. All genotypes studied were the offspring of the same breeders.
2.4. Longitudinal study of f/f mice
Mice were single housed with ad libitum access to food and water. Mice were weighed weekly from 4 to 12 weeks of age. Food consumption was measured weekly by weighing the amount of food left in the cage and subtracting it from the amount present the previous week. Blood was collected in heparinized capillary tubes for glucose measurements using a glucometer and for serum determination of insulin and leptin (ELISA, Crystal Chem, Inc.). Body composition analysis (i.e., fat mass, lean mass and free fluid content) and CLAMS analysis (i.e., oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and spontaneous motor activity) were performed on conscious mice at age 14–15 wks by an NMR-based analyzer with a Minispec LF90II (Bruker Optics) and Comprehensive Laboratory Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbus Instruments), respectively.
For analysis of reproductive function, female mice were checked daily from the time of weaning (at 28 day) for vaginal opening and thereafter for vaginal estrogenization by cellular histology. Mice were checked daily until a second estrous cycle was achieved, or until to 61 day of age.
2.5. Tissue collection
15-wk-old male and female mice received an overdose of pentobarbital (150 mg/kg, IP) and snout to anus length was measured with a micrometer. Gross dissections were performed and tissues including hypothalamus, brown adipose tissue (BAT), liver, white adipose tissue (WAT, gonadal fat pad), and gastrocnemius muscle were collected. Tissue samples were weighed and either snap-frozen on dry ice or fixed in 10% formalin for further analysis of protein lysates and histology, respectively.
2.6. Intravenous glucose tolerance (IVGTT) and microdissection
IVGTTs were performed on a separate cohort of male and female chow or high-fat diet fed 12–14 wk old mice for assessment of glucose stimulated insulin secretion. Mice were anesthetized via i.p. sodium pentobarbital (50–60 mg/kg) and arterial and venous catheters were inserted into the aortic arch and right atrium, respectively, by the University of Michigan Animal Phenotyping Core. The free ends of the catheters were exteriorized at the back of the neck and were fixed subcutaneously following closure of the incision. Following surgery, the catheters were flushed daily with heparin (200 U/ml). After 1 wk of recovery, mice were fasted for 5–6 h and a fasting blood sample was obtained for assessment of basal glucose and insulin. A bolus injection of 50% glucose was then given at 1.5 g/kg-bw via the venous catheter and blood samples were collected T=2, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 after the injection for glucose and insulin analysis. Glucose was measured utilizing an Accu-Chek glucometer (Roche, Germany) and plasma insulin was measured using the Linco rat/mouse insulin ELISA kit. Mice were allowed to recover from the IVGTT for 48 h after which time they were anesthetized and brains were microdissected on a rodent coronal brain matrix and hypothalamus and preoptic areas frozen on dry ice. RNA was extracted from frozen tissue using TRIzol (Invitrogen, NY) and converted to cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (BioRad, CA). cDNA was analyzed in triplicate via quantitative RT-PCR for Gapdh (control) versus other target genes using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Relative mRNA expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔdCT method.
2.7. Perfusion and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
For immunohistochemical analysis, 10 to 12-wk old mice were treated with leptin (5 mg/kg, IP) or PBS and sacrificed 2 h later between 9 a.m. and 12 p.m. Perfusion and IHC procedures were performed essentially as described previously [23]. In brief, mice were deeply anesthetized with an overdose of pentobarbital (150 mg/kg, IP) and transcardially perfused with sterile PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were removed, post-fixed and cryoprotected before sectioning into 30 μm coronal slices, which were collected into 4 representative series and stored at −20 °C until further use. For immunofluorescence, sections were pretreated in ice-cold methanol, 0.6% glycine and 0.03% SDS, and then blocked with donkey serum and incubated in the primary antibodies (rabbit-anti-pSTAT3 [1:500]). Detection of primary antibodies was done by immunofluorescence with donkey anti-rabbit-Alexa 488 [1:200].
2.8. Statistical analysis
Mean±SEM and differences were analyzed by unpaired Fisher's t-test to determine significant differences between groups (f/f versus +/+). Repeated measures ANOVA was performed with StatView. A log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was performed for comparison of survival curves. Differences were accepted for p≤0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Generation of LeprF1077/F1077 mice
To directly assess the physiologic functions controlled by LepR-b Tyr1077, we generated a “knock-in” mouse model in which the endogenous Lepr gene is replaced by LeprF1077- encoding LepR-b F1077 (which contains a Tyr1077→Phe1077 substitution in LepR-b) (Fig. 1A and B). LeprF1077/+ animals were intercrossed to generate LeprF1077/F1077 (f/f) and Lepr+/+ (+/+) control animals for study.
Fig. 1.

Generation of LeprF1077/F1077 mice. (A) Diagram of gene-targeting strategy to generate LeprF1077. Sequences from the targeting vector containing the Tyr1077→Phe1077 substitution replaced the endogenous Lepr exon 18b (which encodes the intracellular domain of LepR-b). (B) Diagram of signaling pathways mediated by LepR-b and LepR-bF1077. (C) STAT3 signaling by LepR-b and LepR-bF1077in vivo. Control (+/+) and f/f mice were treated with PBS or leptin (5 mg/kg, IP) for 2 h prior to perfusion and the examination to pSTAT3 (white nuclei) in the basomedial hypothalamus by immunofluorescence. 3V-third cerebral ventricle.
To confirm the expected expression pattern and unimpaired activity of LepR-b F1077 for signaling pathways other than those mediated by Tyr1077, we examined the stimulation of STAT3 phosphorylation (pSTAT3) by immunofluorescence in the basomedial hypothalamus of f/f and control mice following leptin or PBS treatment (Fig. 1C). As predicted, we detected similar patterns and levels of baseline and leptin-stimulated pSTAT3-immunoreactivity in f/f and +/+ mice, confirming the appropriate distribution and function of LepR-b F1077 in f/f mice.
3.2. LeprF1077/F1077 mice exhibit modestly increased energy balance despite normal hypothalamic gene expression
We examined body weight and adiposity in male and female control and f/f mice fed a normal chow (NC) or calorically-dense high fat (45%; HFD) diet from 4–12 wks of age (Fig. 2). On a NC diet, the body weight of f/f males was similar to controls although repeated measures ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in body weight by genotype for females over the duration of the study (Fig. 2A and B), suggesting a potentially greater role in females for the control of energy balance by LepR-b Tyr1077. While not statistically different at any single age, HFD-challenged animals of both sexes were slightly heavier than controls over the duration of the study by repeated measures ANOVA (Fig. 2C and D). Fat mass was also modestly increased in both male and female NC-fed animals (Fig. 2E and F), although circulating leptin levels were only statistically elevated in female f/f mice (Fig. 2G and H). Although HFD tended to increase fat mass and leptin concentrations in all groups, no significant differences were detected between genotypes in HFD-fed animals (Fig. 2E–H ). No differences were detected in lean mass, snout–anus length, temperature, or other non-adipose tissue parameters between control and f/f mice (Tables 1 and 2).
Fig. 2.

Modestly positive energy balance in female LeprF1077/F1077 mice. (A–D) Body weight for males (A and C) and females (B and D) was measured weekly from 4–12 wks for animals fed NC (A and B) and HFD (C and D). E–F. Body adiposity for males (E) and females (F) as determined by fat pad mass at 15 wks of age. (G–H) Plasma leptin levels of males (G) and females (H) on NC and HFD. All data are plotted as mean±SEM, n≥10 per genotype. *p≤0.05 by Student's t-test for (E–H) and by repeated measures ANOVA for B,E,F.
Table 1.
Physiologic parameters for male LeprF1077/F1077 mice. At 14 wks of age, male animals of the indicated genotype were subjected to body composition determination. At 15 wks of age, animals were euthanized for the determination of snout to anus (S–A) length, and tissues were weighed. Measurements of serum leptin and insulin are from ad libitum-fed animals at 12 wks of age. Blood glucose measurements are from ad libitum-fed animals of 12 wks of age (or overnight (18-hour) fasted animals of 13 wks of age, where indicated). Temperature was taken in awake freely moving 12 wk old animals. All data are presented as mean±SEM, n≥10 per genotype per condition.
| Male |
NC |
HFD |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/+ | f/f | +/+ | f/f | |
| Lean mass (g) | 21.2±0.4 | 20.4±0.3 | 19.9±0.4 | 21.1±0.5 |
| S–A length (mm) | 92.2±0.7 | 91.7±0.5 | 91.1±0.9 | 91.5±1.4 |
| WAT (g) | 0.40±0.02 | 0.50±0.04⁎ | 1.07±0.11 | 1.37±0.18 |
| BAT (g) | 0.057±0.003 | 0.056±0.002 | 0.087±0.006 | 0.082±0.010 |
| Liver (g) | 0.85±0.03 | 0.88±0.02 | 0.70±0.03 | 0.79±0.05 |
| Muscle (g) | 0.138±0.004 | 0.131±0.002 | 0.135±0.003 | 0.130±0.003 |
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 2.4±0.4 | 2.9±0.4 | 7.1±1.0 | 11.1±2.4 |
| Insulin (fed) (ng/ml) | 1.9±0.3 | 2.3±0.4 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.0±0.5 |
| Glucose (fed) (mmol/L) | 6.9±0.2 | 6.8±0.2 | 6.8±0.2 | 7.2±0.3 |
| Glucose (fasted) (mmol/L) | 4.1±0.3 | 4.6±0.2 | 5.6±0.5 | 5.5±0.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 37.6±0.2 | 40.0±0.3 | 38.4±0.2 | 38.3±0.2 |
p≤0.05 by Student's t-test for f/f compared to +/+ animals on the same diet.
Table 2.
Physiologic parameters for female LeprF1077/F1077 mice. At 14 wks of age, female animals of the indicated genotype were subjected to body composition determination. At 15 wks of age, animals were euthanized for the determination of snout to anus (S–A) length, and tissues were weighed. Measurements of serum leptin and insulin are from ad libitum-fed animals at 12 wks of age. Blood glucose measurements are from ad libitum-fed animals of 12 wks of age (or overnight (18-hour) fasted animals of 13 wks of age, where indicated). Temperature was taken in awake freely moving 12 wk old animals. All data are presented as mean±SEM, n≥10 per genotype per condition.
| Female |
NC |
HFD |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/+ | f/f | +/+ | f/f | |
| Lean mass (g) | 17.7±0.2 | 17.6±0.5 | 16.7±0.4 | 16.6±0.4 |
| S–A length (mm) | 88.2±0.6 | 87.8±0.7 | 87.8±0.7 | 87.5±0.7 |
| WAT (g) | 0.14±0.01 | 0.29±0.04⁎ | 0.30±0.05 | 0.37±0.07 |
| BAT (g) | 0.043±0.002 | 0.046±0.003 | 0.052±0.003 | 0.057±0.006 |
| Liver (g) | 0.75±0.02 | 0.78±0.03 | 0.55±0.02 | 0.58±0.03 |
| Muscle (g) | 0.109±0.002 | 0.106±0.003 | 0.107±0.002 | 0.108±0.003 |
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1±0.1 | 1.6±0.3⁎ | 6.0±1.3 | 4.9±0.8 |
| Insulin (fed) (ng/ml) | 1.1±0.1 | 1.0±0.1 | 2.1±0.4 | 1.9±0.4 |
| Glucose (fed) (mmol/L) | 6.0±0.2 | 6.0±0.2 | 6.5±0.2 | 6.7±0.2 |
| Glucose (fasted) (mmol/L) | 4.4±0.2 | 3.6±0.4 | 4.2±0.3 | 4.4±0.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 37.6±0.3 | 38.4±0.2 | 37.9±0.1 | 37.9±0.1 |
p≤0.05 by Student's t-test for f/f compared to +/+ animals on the same diet.
To determine the mechanisms underlying the increased body weight and adiposity of f/f mice, we examined food intake over the course of the study, as well as metabolic rate (Fig. 3). We detected no differences in feeding by genotype in NC-fed animals of either sex, but cumulative food intake was increased by approximately 5–10 % in the HFD-fed f/f mice of both sexes (Fig. 3A and B). While metabolic rate, as determined by oxygen consumption, and total activity did not differ between NC female control and f/f mice, male f/f mice displayed elevated dark and light cycle VO2 that were independent of activity (which was not altered in f/f mice of either sex) (Fig. 3C, Supplemental Fig. 1). Increased energy expenditure in male f/f animals may contribute to the more modest body weight phenotype displayed by male relative to female f/f mice. Mutation of LepR-b Tyr1077 did not alter respiratory quotient (RQ) in either sex (Supplemental Fig. 1C and D). Thus, f/f animals of both sexes demonstrate slightly positive energy balance relative to controls, likely due to slightly increased food intake, although the differences between genotypes are small enough that they are not detectable under all dietary conditions.
Fig. 3.

Leptin action via Tyr1077 modestly regulates HFD-feeding and energy expenditure. (A–B) Food intake was measured weekly for male (A) and female (B) NC and HFD-fed control and f/f mice, and the total amount of food consumed over the 12-wk study period is shown. (C–F) Male (C and E) and female (D and F) mice were subjected to CLAMS analysis to determine VO2 corrected for lean body mass (C and D), and total spontaneous motor activity (E and F). Data are shown for dark cycle (Dark), light cycle (Light) and averaged over 24 h (Total). All data are plotted as mean±SEM, n=4–8 per genotype. *p≤0.05 by Student's t-test.
Leptin modulates energy balance, at least in part, by promoting the expression of anorectic peptides such as those derived from proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and inhibiting the production of the orexigenic peptides (including neuropeptide Y (NPY) and by agouti-related peptide (AgRP)) in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC) [24,25]. To examine whether altered expression of these hypothalamic neuropeptides might contribute to the modest defects in energy balance in f/f animals, we examined hypothalamic mRNA expression for these peptides in male and female NC and HFD fed control and f/f mice (Supplemental Fig. 2). The expression of Pomc, Npy, and Agrp were similar in f/f mice and controls, regardless of diet, suggesting that LEPR Tyr1077 does not modulate energy balance by impacting the expression of these neuropeptides.
3.3. Minimal alteration in glucose homeostasis in LeprF1077/F1077 mice
Despite the minimal effect of LepR-b Tyr1077 mutation on body weight, we examined glucose homeostasis in f/f mice to determine whether Tyr1077 might contribute to glucose homeostasis independently of energy balance. Neither glucose nor insulin concentrations differed by genotype in fed or fasted animals of either sex on NC or HFD (Tables 1 and 2). During an intravenous glucose tolerance test, glucose clearance and insulin secretion were similar between control and f/f mice of both sexes on either NC or HFD (Fig. 4A, B, E, F; Supplemental Fig. 2); area under the curve for both glucose and insulin were not different by genotype during this test (Fig. 4C, D, G, H). Male HFD f/f mice did trend towards overall impaired insulin secretion following glucose administration, however, and exhibited increased blood insulin levels relative to control mice 15 min following glucose injection (Fig. 4E)- consistent with modestly decreased insulin sensitivity resulting from slightly increased adiposity. Overall these data suggest that LepR-b Tyr1077 does not play a significant direct role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis and/or insulin secretion.
Fig. 4.

Preserved glucose stimulated insulin secretion in LeprF1077/F1077 mice. Glucose stimulated insulin secretion was assessed by intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) in males and females on HFD. (A and B). Plasma glucose for males (A) and females (B) during the IVGTT. (C and D). Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma glucose for males (C) and females (D) for the duration of the test. (E and F). Plasma insulin levels in male (E) and (F) female mice during the 60 min post-glucose bolus. (G and H). Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma insulin for male (G) and female (H) mice for the duration of the test. *p≤0.05 by Student's t-test and indicates time points in which groups statistically differed. All data are plotted as mean±SEM, n≥8 per genotype.
3.4. Impaired reproductive function in LeprF1077/F1077 females
To determine the potential contribution of LepR-b Tyr1077 to the control of reproduction by leptin, we examined estrus cycling in f/f and control females by daily monitoring of vaginal cytology (Fig. 5). We observed no significant difference in the time of vaginal opening (30.4±0.3 day for +/+ and 32±0.4 day for f/f) or in the time of onset of first estrus (45.7±1.3 day for +/+ and 44.2±1.4 day for f/f), suggesting that signaling by LepR-b Tyr1077 is not required for the neuroendocrine events that lead up to and initiate puberty. In contrast, continued monitoring of these animals revealed that f/f females tended to progress to a second estrus less frequently than controls (p=0.07) and those f/f animals that achieved a second estrus had inter-cycle intervals almost twice as long as controls (Fig. 5A and B). Thus, while LepR-b Tyr1077 is not required for the onset of fertility, it is required for ongoing appropriate function of the reproductive system. Hypothalamic expression of the mRNAs encoding kisspeptin (Kiss) and tachykinin-2/neurokinin B (Tac2), both of which are important for the control of reproduction [26,27], were not different between adult f/f and control animals (Supplemental Fig. 4), consistent with the essential lack of LepR-b expression in kisspeptin-containing hypothalamic neurons [28,29], and suggesting that the effect of LepR-b Tyr1077 on reproduction must be mediated independently of effects on the expression of these neuropeptides.
Fig. 5.

Disrupted estrous cycling in LeprF1077/F1077 females. Vaginal histology was examined daily in female +/+ and f/f mice from 28 day until 61 day of age (or until a second estrous cycle was observed). (A) Kaplan–Meier plot of time to attainment of second estrus cycle (VE2) for female +/+ and f/f mice revealed no statistically significant differences between groups as a whole (p=0.07); however, 84% of +/+ mice attained VE2 while only 58% of f/f mice did. (B) Time between VE1 and VE2 for animals that attained VE2 by the end of the study. Data are plotted as mean±SEM; *p≤0.05 by Student's t-test, n≥12 per genotype.
4. Discussion
The role for the LepR-b tyrosine phosphorylation site, Tyr1077, in leptin action has not previously been examined. Our data reveal that signaling via LepR-b Tyr1077 contributes to the control of energy balance, primarily by modulating food intake, and modulates the female reproductive axis following the onset of puberty. Although LepR-b Tyr1077 clearly plays a role in the control of energy balance, the contribution of this signaling pathway pales in comparison to that of Tyr1138, mutation of which doubles food intake, diminishes energy expenditure, and increases adiposity and leptin levels by approximately 10-fold [17–20]. Since the obesity of animals mutant for LepR-b Tyr1138 is slightly less than that of Leprdb/db animals and Tyr985 mutant animals are slightly lean [14,17–20], Tyr1077-mediated signaling likely contributes to the difference in energy balance between animals mutant for LepR-b Tyr1138 and Leprdb/db animals. Mice mutant for all three intracellular tyrosine residues on LepR-b (LepR-b3F) are not different than mice mutant solely for Tyr1138 in terms of energy balance and metabolism, however, and both of these animal models remain less impaired than Leprdb/db animals [20]. Since the metabolic phenotype of mice containing a LepR-b deleted for the majority of the intracellular domain (LepR-bΔ65) closely resembles that of Leprdb/db animals [11], it is possible that a non-phosphorylated LepR-b motif, rather than Tyr1077, represents the major non-Tyr 1138 metabolic signal mediated by LepR-b . While signaling by LepR-b Tyr1077 modestly impacts feeding, it does not appear to directly impact parameters of glucose homeostasis, and the normal to increased energy expenditure in f/f animals suggests no direct role for Tyr1077 in the augmentation of metabolic rate by leptin.
Relative to the anovulatory infertility of Leprdb/db mice on most genetic backgrounds, reproductive function is only modestly impacted in mice mutant for Tyr1138: While female Tyr1138-mutant animals exhibit slightly delayed onset of estrus, they ovulate and can reproduce [17–20]. The impaired progression of f/f mice to regular cyclicity and the increased interval between cycles suggests an important role for LepR-b Tyr1077 in the control of the reproductive axis by leptin. Indeed, while mice expressing LepR-b 3F exhibit parameters of energy balance and metabolism similar to mice mutant only for Tyr1138 [20], reproduction in the LepR-b 3F animals is severely impaired relative to Tyr1138 mutant mice; LepR-b 3F mice demonstrate absolute infertility similar to Leprdb/db animals and mice expressing LepR-b Δ65, consistent with the requirement for a LepR-b tyrosine phosphorylation site other than Tyr1138 in the control of reproduction by LepR-b . The impaired reproductive function of f/f mice, coupled with the lack of detectable changes to reproduction in mice mutant for LepR-b Tyr985, suggest that Tyr1077 represents the site crucial for reproduction. Since f/f mice exhibit only minor increases in adiposity in the absence of other detectable metabolic or gene expression changes, the reproductive derangements in these animals likely result from direct effects of Tyr1077 signaling on components of the reproductive axis. In contrast, the incomplete fertility of mice mutant for LepR-b Tyr1138 could be secondary to the obesity, diabetes, and altered endocrine milieu (e.g., hypothyroidism, hypercortisolism) of these animals [17–20], rather than resulting from a direct effect of Tyr1138 signaling on the reproductive system.
Since Tyr1077 directly mediates the majority of STAT5 signaling by LepR-b [10,16], we postulate that the phenotype of the f/f animals stems from impaired LepR-b→STAT5 signaling. Unfortunately, leptin-induced phosphorylation of STAT5 does not appear as robust as phosphorylation of STAT3 and therefore, we were unable to assess the degree of impaired STAT5 signaling via immunoprecipitation and Westen blot in the f/f animals. Indeed, deletion of STAT5 from the CNS (Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre animals) produces mild obesity that manifests primarily in older animals [30]. Since young Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre animals were not studied for their endocrine phenotype, it is not possible to determine whether the impaired thermoregulation, and the hyperleptinemic and hyperinsulinemic phenotypes of these animals were primary and present before the onset of their obesity, or rather if these components of their phenotype were secondary to their increased adiposity. Therefore, we cannot directly compare to the metabolic phenotype of Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre to our LepR-b Tyr1077 mutated f/f animals. Additionally, STAT5 was deleted throughout the CNS in Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre animals, and some of their phenotype may stem from impaired signaling by other cytokines, such as GM-CSF, in non-LepR-b neurons [30,31]. Furthermore, no measures were taken to assess reproductive maturation or function in Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre mice, so we are unable to address whether the reproductive phenotype seen in female f/f mice is directly due to loss of LepR-b→Stat5 signaling. In the future, it will be important to directly compare the roles for STAT5 and Tyr1077 in LepR-b signaling in both metabolic and reproductive control.
The LepR-b-expressing cell type(s) and neural mechanisms responsible for mediating the effects of Tyr1077 and/or STAT5 on the control of energy balance and reproduction also remain unclear. As for Stat5fl/fl Nestin-cre animals, which displayed no detectable alterations in the known direct neuropeptide transcriptional targets of leptin action [30], similar analysis in f/f mice revealed no alteration in the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides known to be involved in energy balance (such as Pomc, Npy, and Agrp). Neither were we able to detect changes in the mRNA expression of known ARC mediators of reproductive control (such as Kiss, pDyn, and Tac2) in the f/f animals (Supplemental Fig. 4 and data not shown). Indeed, we and others have shown little overlap between LepR-b-expressing and kisspeptin-containing neurons, and leptin minimally, if at all, contributes to the control of transcription in these neurons under fed or fasted conditions [28,29,32] (and our data not shown). Along these lines, deletion of LepRbs from ARC specific POMC and AgRP cell populations does not impair fertility [33,34]. These data suggest that the LepR-b cells responsible for Tyr1077 mediated metabolic and reproductive effects likely reside outside of the classic ARC circuits where the soma containing these regulatory peptides reside. Leptin is known to be permissive of the GnRH surge in rodents, and acyclic db/db mice display impaired GnRH release and pituitary dysfunction. Although LepRbs are not directly present on GnRH neurons [29], it is possible that leptin-induced phosphorylation of STAT5 may be the signal, which indirectly controls leptin's permissive action on the GnRH surge and subsequent cyclicity. The anatomical target for LepR-b- Tyr1077 signaling, and ultimately leptin's overall reproductive effects may be the ventral premammilary nucleus (PMv); PMv LepR-b neurons have been shown to mediate leptin action on the reproductive system [28,35–38] and deletion of LepR-b from Nos1-expressing neurons, the majority of which lie in the PMv, interferes with female reproductive function [39]. Unfortunately, transcriptional targets for leptin have not been identified in the PMv. Identifying leptin-regulated PMv transcripts and determining roles for specific leptin signals, such as Tyr1077, in their regulation will be crucial for our long-term understanding of the mechanisms by which leptin modulates both energy homeostasis and the reproductive axis.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
We thank Zhixiao Zhang for excellent technical assistance and Erin Shellman for help with statistics. We thank Nathan Qi, Katie Gee, and Melanie Schmitt for their expertise and help during metabolic assessment of mice at the University of Michigan Animal Phenotyping Core. Core support was provided by the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center (P60 DK020572; C&MB and Animal Phenotyping Cores) and the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. Supported by the Marilyn H. Vincent Foundation and grants from the American Diabetes Association, American Heart Association and the NIH (R37DK056731) (to MGM). CMP was supported by T32HL007853.
Appendix A. Supporting information
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2012.05.001.
Appendix A. Supplementary materials




References
- 1.Ahima R.S., Prabakaran D., Mantzoros C., Qu D., Lowell B., Maratos-Flier E. Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature. 1996;382:250–252. doi: 10.1038/382250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Myers M.G., Jr., Munzberg H., Leinninger G.M., Leshan R.L. The geometry of leptin action in the brain: more complicated than a simple ARC. Cell metabolism. 2009;9:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chua S.C., Jr., Chung W.K., Wu-Peng X.S., Zhang Y., Liu S.M., Tartaglia L. Phenotypes of mouse diabetes and rat fatty due to mutations in the OB (leptin) receptor. Science (New York, NY) 1996;271:994–996. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5251.994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang Y., Proenca R., Maffei M., Barone M., Leopold L., Friedman J.M. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature. 1994;372:425–432. doi: 10.1038/372425a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cohen P., Zhao C., Cai X., Montez J.M., Rohani S.C., Feinstein P. Selective deletion of leptin receptor in neurons leads to obesity. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001;108:1113–1121. doi: 10.1172/JCI13914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Luca C., Kowalski T.J., Zhang Y., Elmquist J.K., Lee C., Kilimann M.W. Complete rescue of obesity, diabetes, and infertility in db/db mice by neuron-specific LEPR-B transgenes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:3484–3493. doi: 10.1172/JCI24059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chua S.C., Jr., Koutras I.K., Han L., Liu S.M., Kay J., Young S.J. Fine structure of the murine leptin receptor gene: Splice site suppression is required to form two alternatively spliced transcripts. Genomics. 1997;45:264–270. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Robertson S.A., Leinninger G.M., Myers M.G., Jr. Molecular and neural mediators of leptin action. Physiology and Behavior. 2008;94:637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kloek C., Haq A.K., Dunn S.L., Lavery H.J., Banks A.S., Myers M.G., Jr. Regulation of Jak kinases by intracellular leptin receptor sequences. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:41547–41555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205148200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gong Y., Ishida-Takahashi R., Villanueva E.C., Fingar D.C., Munzberg H., Myers M.G., Jr. The long form of the leptin receptor regulates STAT5 and ribosomal protein S6 via alternate mechanisms. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:31019–31027. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robertson S., Ishida-Takahashi R., Tawara I., Hu J., Patterson C.M., Jones J.C. Insufficiency of Janus kinase 2-autonomous leptin receptor signals for most physiologic leptin actions. Diabetes. 2010;59:782–790. doi: 10.2337/db09-1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Banks A.S., Davis S.M., Bates S.H., Myers M.G., Jr. Activation of downstream signals by the long form of the leptin receptor. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:14563–14572. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bjorbaek C., Lavery H.J., Bates S.H., Olson R.K., Davis S.M., Flier J.S. SOCS3 mediates feedback inhibition of the leptin receptor via Tyr985. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:40649–40657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007577200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bjornholm M., Munzberg H., Leshan R.L., Villanueva E.C., Bates S.H., Louis G.W. Mice lacking inhibitory leptin receptor signals are lean with normal endocrine function. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2007;117:1354–1360. doi: 10.1172/JCI30688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.You J., Yu Y., Jiang L., Li W., Yu X., Gonzalez L. Signaling through Tyr985 of leptin receptor as an age/diet-dependent switch in the regulation of energy balance. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;30:1650–1659. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01307-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hekerman P., Zeidler J., Bamberg-Lemper S., Knobelspies H., Lavens D., Tavernier J. Pleiotropy of leptin receptor signalling is defined by distinct roles of the intracellular tyrosines. The FEBS Journal. 2005;272:109–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2004.04391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bates S.H., Stearns W.H., Schubert M., Tso A.W.K., Wang Y., Banks A.S. STAT3 signaling is required for leptin regulation of energy balance but not reproduction. Nature. 2003;421:856–859. doi: 10.1038/nature01388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bates S.H., Dundon T.A., Seifert M., Carlson M., Maratos-Flier E., Myers M.G., Jr. LRb-STAT3 signaling is required for the neuroendocrine regulation of energy expenditure by leptin. Diabetes. 2004;53:3067–3073. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bates S.H., Kulkarni R.N., Seifert M., Myers M.G., Jr. Roles for leptin receptor/STAT3-dependent and -independent signals in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Cell Metabolism. 2005;1:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiang L., You J., Yu X., Gonzalez L., Yu Y., Wang Q. Tyrosine-dependent and -independent actions of leptin receptor in control of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:18619–18624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804589105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patterson C.M., Leshan R.L., Jones J.C., Myers M.G., Jr. Molecular mapping of mouse brain regions innervated by leptin receptor-expressing cells. Brain Research. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soliman G.A., Ishida-Takahashi R., Gong Y., Jones J.C., Leshan R.L., Saunders T.L. A simple qPCR-based method to detect correct insertion of homologous targeting vectors in murine ES cells. Transgenic Research. 2007;16:665–670. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Munzberg H., Jobst E.E., Bates S.H., Jones J., Villanueva E., Leshan R. Appropriate inhibition of orexigenic hypothalamic arcuate nucleus neurons independently of leptin receptor/STAT3 signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2007;27:69–74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3168-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morton G.J., Cummings D.E., Baskin D.G., Barsh G.S., Schwartz M.W. Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight. Nature. 2006;443:289–295. doi: 10.1038/nature05026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gautron L., Elmquist J.K. Sixteen years and counting: an update on leptin in energy balance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:2087–2093. doi: 10.1172/JCI45888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roa J., Castellano J.M., Navarro V.M., Handelsman D.J., Pinilla L., Tena-Sempere M. Kisspeptins and the control of gonadotropin secretion in male and female rodents. Peptides. 2009;30:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kauffman A.S., Clifton D.K., Steiner R.A. Emerging ideas about kisspeptin- GPR54 signaling in the neuroendocrine regulation of reproduction. Trends In Neurosciences. 2007;30:504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Donato J., Jr., Cravo R.M., Frazao R., Gautron L., Scott M.M., Lachey J. Leptin's effect on puberty in mice is relayed by the ventral premammillary nucleus and does not require signaling in Kiss1 neurons. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:355–368. doi: 10.1172/JCI45106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Louis G.W., Greenwald-Yarnell M., Phillips R., Coolen L.M., Lehman M.N., Myers M.G., Jr. Molecular mapping of the neural pathways linking leptin to the neuroendocrine reproductive axis. Endocrinology. 2011;152:2302–2310. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee J.Y., Muenzberg H., Gavrilova O., Reed J.A., Berryman D., Villanueva E.C. Loss of Cytokine-STAT5 signaling in the CNS and pituitary gland alters energy balance and leads to obesity. PLoS.ONE. 2008;3:e1639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reed J.A., Clegg D.J., Smith K.B., Tolod-Richer E.G., Matter E.K., Picard L.S. GM-CSF action in the CNS decreases food intake and body weight. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:3035–3044. doi: 10.1172/JCI25681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.True C., Kirigiti M.A., Kievit P., Grove K.L., Smith M.S. Leptin is not the critical signal for kisspeptin or luteinising hormone restoration during exit from negative energy balance. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2011;23:1099–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02144.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Balthasar N., Coppari R., McMinn J., Liu S.M., Lee C.E., Tang V., Kenny C.D., McGovern R.A., Chua S.C., Jr., Elmquist J.K. Leptin receptor signaling in POMC neurons is required for normal body weight homeostasis. Neuron. 2004;42:983–991. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van de Wall, E., Leshan, R., Xu, A.W., Balthasar, N., Coppari, R., Liu, S.M., Jo, Y.H., MacKenzie, R.G., Allison, D.B., Dun, N.J., et al., 2008. Collective and individual functions of leptin receptor modulated neurons controlling metabolism and ingestion. Endocrinology 149:1773–1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Leshan R.L., Louis G.W., Jo Y.H., Rhodes C.J., Munzberg H., Myers M.G., Jr. Direct innervation of GnRH neurons by metabolic- and sexual odorant-sensing leptin receptor neurons in the hypothalamic ventral premammillary nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:3138–3147. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0155-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Donato J., Jr., Cravo R.M., Frazao R., Elias C.F. Hypothalamic sites of leptin action linking metabolism and reproduction. Neuroendocrinology. 2011;93:9–18. doi: 10.1159/000322472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cravo R.M., Margatho L.O., Osborne-Lawrence S., Donato J., Jr., Atkin S., Bookout A.L. Characterization of Kiss1 neurons using transgenic mouse models. Neuroscience. 2011;173:37–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Donato J., Jr., Silva R.J., Sita L.V., Lee S., Lee C., Lacchini S. The ventral premammillary nucleus links fasting-induced changes in leptin levels and coordinated luteinizing hormone secretion. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:5240–5250. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0405-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Leshan, RL, Greenwald-Yarnell, M, Patterson, CM, Gonzalez, IE, Myers, MG, Jr., 2012. Leptin action via hypothalamic nitric oxide synthase-1 neurons controls energy balance. Nature Medicine 18:820–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
