Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2013 Sep 2;8(9):e72939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072939

Response of Burkholderia cenocepacia H111 to Micro-Oxia

Gabriella Pessi 1,*, Rubina Braunwalder 1, Alexander Grunau 1, Ulrich Omasits 2, Christian H Ahrens 2, Leo Eberl 1
Editor: Tom Coenye3
PMCID: PMC3759415  PMID: 24023794

Abstract

B. cenocepacia is an opportunistic human pathogen that is particularly problematic for patients suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF). In the CF lung bacteria grow to high densities within the viscous mucus that is limited in oxygen. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the dominant pathogen in CF patients, is known to grow and survive under oxygen-limited to anaerobic conditions by using micro-oxic respiration, denitrification and fermentative pathways. In contrast, inspection of the genome sequences of available B. cenocepacia strains suggested that B. cenocepacia is an obligate aerobic and non-fermenting bacterium. In accordance with the bioinformatics analysis we observed that B. cenocepacia H111 is able to grow with as little as 0.1% O2 but not under strictly anoxic conditions. Phenotypic analyses revealed that H111 produced larger amounts of biofilm, pellicle and proteases under micro-oxic conditions (0.5%–5% O2, i.e. conditions that mimic those encountered in CF lung infection), and was more resistant to several antibiotics. RNA-Seq and shotgun proteomics analyses of cultures of B. cenocepacia H111 grown under micro-oxic and aerobic conditions showed up-regulation of genes involved in the synthesis of the exopolysaccharide (EPS) cepacian as well as several proteases, two isocitrate lyases and other genes potentially important for life in micro-oxia.

Data deposition: RNA-Seq raw data files are accessible through the GEO Series accession number GSE48585. MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange database (PXD000270).

Introduction

Burkholderia cenocepacia is one of the 17 members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) whose extraordinary metabolic versatility allows it to adapt to a variety of environmental conditions, including infection sites in humans [1], [2]. Of particular concern are lung infections of patients suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF). One of the major problems associated with Bcc infections is their capacity to form highly organized surfaced-associated communities (biofilms) with an intrinsic resistance to most common antibiotics in clinical use [1], [3]. Several strains of the Bcc species B. multivorans, B. cenocepacia, B. cepacia, and B. dolosa have been shown to be highly transmissible between patients [4], with B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans accounting for the majority of CF infections [5]. During chronic colonization of the CF lung, bacteria are under strong selective pressures that result from challenges of the immune defense, antimicrobial therapy, nutrient and oxygen availability [6]. B. cenocepacia produces biofilms and uses the highly viscous mucus of the CF lung as a rich nutrient source. Due to bacterial respiration a steep oxygen gradient within the mucus is generated and the deeper layers become anaerobic [7][10]. This observation is supported by the fact that anaerobes have been found to occur in CF sputum at high cell densities [11]. Recently, Alvarez-Ortega and colleagues provided evidence that the major CF pathogen P. aeruginosa is growing in the CF lung preferentially by micro-oxic respiration [12]. Moreover, chemostat experiments with aerobic and micro-oxic cultures of P. aeruginosa suggested that this facultative anaerobe is growing optimally in a micro-oxic environment where it is producing more virulence factors such as the exopolysaccharide (EPS) alginate and pyocyanine [13]. Further studies have also shown that an anaerobic environment stimulates the production of alginate [7], [9]. In anaerobiosis, P. aeruginosa can utilize nitrate or nitrite rather than oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor [14][17]. In the absence of nitrate or nitrite, it can convert arginine to ornithine, thereby generating energy for anoxic growth [16][18]. Finally P. aeruginosa can use pyruvate fermentation for long-term survival of up to 18 days under anoxic conditions and this conversion of pyruvate into lactate, acetate, and succinate is in turn inhibited by nitrate respiration [19].

In a retrospective study of a Burkholderia dolosa outbreak among CF patients, the genomes of 112 isolates collected from 14 individuals over 16 years were sequenced and intriguingly revealed that 3 out of the 17 genes found to be under strong selection during pathogenesis had mutations in genes involved in oxygen-dependent regulation [20]. This suggests that sensing of a low oxygen environment is critical for pathogenesis in lung infections.

These findings posed the question of how B. cenocepacia, which is considered an obligate aerobe, can grow or survive in the micro-oxic/anoxic CF lung environment. Very recently, Sass and colleagues reported a low-oxygen activated locus (lxa) that has been shown to play an important role in regulation of the low oxygen response in B. cenocepacia strains J2315 and K56-2 [21]. After exposure to an anoxic environment, the lxa mutant showed less viable cells compared to the wild type. However, the B. cenocepacia H111 strain, which was originally isolated from a CF patient as well as other B. cepacia complex (Bcc) strains, do not possess the lxa locus [21], [22].

Here we show that B. cenocepacia H111 as well as other B. cenocepacia strains did not display any obvious functions that would allow anaerobic growth: no genes were found that are involved in denitrification and arginine fermentation. However, H111 is able to grow at an oxygen concentration of 0.1%, yet cannot grow anoxically in culture. When grown micro-oxically, B. cenocepacia produces more substratum-associated biofilm mass as well as a more robust pellicle compared to aerobic conditions. Finally, RNA-Seq and shotgun proteomics analyses from matched aerobic and micro-oxic samples were carried out to obtain a more detailed view of the repertoire of genes and proteins potentially important for growth in a low oxygen environment.

Results

Growth of B. cenocepacia H111 at different oxygen concentrations

The ability of B. cenocepacia to grow at different oxygen concentrations in complex media was tested. When cells were grown under normal aerobic conditions (21% O2), the cells grew to an optical density (OD600) of around 3 with a generation time of approximately 65 minutes. When only 5% or 0.5% oxygen was supplied (see Methods), the cells grew slower (generation times of 113 and 180 minutes, respectively), probably because the dissolved oxygen concentration dropped quickly to growth limiting levels (Figure 1). However, B. cenocepacia was still able to grow with 0.1% oxygen with a doubling time of 268 minutes, reaching an OD600 of 0.7. To test for growth in the absence of oxygen, several alternative electron acceptors, including nitrate, fumarate, and DMSO as well as the C-sources pyruvate, oxalate and arginine and a medium mimicking synthetic mucus [12], were tested. However, in none of the conditions tested did we observe growth in the absence of oxygen.

Figure 1. Growth of B. cenocepacia at different oxygen concentrations (21%, 5%, 0.5% and 0.1%).

Figure 1

Aerobic cultures (21%, black line) were grown with shaking in 1L Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml LB medium while micro-oxic cultures were grown in 500-ml rubber-stoppered serum bottles containing 25 ml LB medium in presence of a nitrogen gas atmosphere that contained 5% (grey line), 0.5% (grey dashed line) or 0.1% (grey dotted line) oxygen (Pangas). Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

Identification of genes in the B. cenocepacia H111 genome that may be required for growth under “low-oxygen” conditions

To identify genes related to denitrification, arginine fermentation or pyruvate fermentation, we searched for the corresponding P. aeruginosa orthologs in B. cenocepacia H111 and other sequenced Burkholderia species. The genes required for denitrification which encode all enzymes for nitrate/nitrite, nitric-oxide and nitrous-oxide reduction (PA3872-75, PA0509-PA0519, PA0520-24, PA3391-96), could only be identified in the “pseudomallei” group members B. thailandensis, B. pseudomallei and B. mallei. Indeed B. pseudomallei was reported to be able to survive without oxygen using nitrate respiration [23], [24]. In contrast, B. cenocepacia strains, including strain H111 were found to only possess the nitrite reductase encoding gene cluster (BCAM1683-86). P. aeruginosa is also able to generate ATP by the degradation of arginine to ornithine, which requires expression of the arcABC operon (PA5170-73) [18]. While arcB (ornithine carbamoyltransferase) is present in all sequenced B. cenocepacia strains, the entire operon is only present in strains of B. thailandensis, B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, B. ambifaria, B. xenovorans, B. phymatum and B. phytofirmans. The fermentation of pyruvate can also be used by P. aeruginosa to generate energy and survive during anoxic growth (PA0835-36 and PA0927) [19]. The genes necessary for the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, acetate, and succinate, i.e. the acetate kinase ackA, the phosphate acetyltransferase pta and the lactate dehydrogenase ldhA, were found in the genome of all Burkholderia species. Many bacteria adapt to micro-oxic conditions by synthetizing a particular cytochrome c oxidase (cbb3) complex with a high affinity for oxygen [25][27]. No classical cbb 3 cytochrome oxidase was found in any of the sequenced Burkholderia strains. In contrast, a homolog of the bd-type oxidase (cyanide insensitive) was identified in the genome of several Burkholderia strains including strain H111 (BCAM2674-75). Homologs of the P. aeruginosa central regulator of anaerobic metabolism FNR/ANR (PA1544) [28] were identified in all sequenced Burkholderia strains. The strain H111 has two FNR/ANR orthologs, BCAM0049 and BCAM1483.

Micro-oxic conditions favor the sessile lifestyle

The capacity of our model strain H111 to form a biofilm in a polystyrene microtiter dish-based assay was tested under aerobic and micro-oxic conditions. The biofilm index (BI), i.e. biofilm mass normalized against planktonic growth, was used to compensate for the different growth rates. The amount of adhered biomass in cells grown to the begin of stationary phase was found to be significantly higher with 0.5% oxygen (Biofilm Index 80%) compared to 21% oxygen (Biofilm index 55%) (p-value<0.01, Figure 2). We also tested for pellicle formation, i.e. the biofilm formed at the liquid-air interface of static cultures and B. cenocepacia was found to produce more pellicle under micro-oxic conditions (data not shown). Other phenotypes such as swarming and swimming motility were not affected by oxygen availability after 48 hours of incubation. In contrast, the production of siderophores as measured on CAS plates was reduced in micro-oxically grown cells (Figure S1).

Figure 2. Influence of oxygen on biofilm formation in B. cenocepacia H111.

Figure 2

Biofilm formation in ABC minimal medium. B. cenocepacia H111 was grown in 96-well plates under aerobic (black) or in micro-oxic (grey) conditions created in a CampyGen compact system (oxoid). Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

The production of extracellular factors such as cellulases, proteases, lipases, was also investigated. These assays revealed that proteolytic activity was significantly higher under micro-oxic conditions (p-value<0.01, Figure 3) while lipolytic and cellulolytic activities remained constant and were independent of the oxygen level. To examine whether cells that were grown with low oxygen were also more resistant to antibiotics, we exposed cells grown micro-oxically and aerobically on plates to the aminoglycosides kanamycin, gentamycin and to tetracycline. Cells grown micro-oxically showed an increased resistance to all tested aminoglycosides as well as to tetracycline (Figure 4).

Figure 3. Protease activity is increased in micro-oxia.

Figure 3

The exoenzymes cellulase, protease and lipase were measured in supernatants of aerobic (black) and micro-oxic (grey) growing cells as described in material and methods. The activity in the supernatant of aerobic cells was set to 100%. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 6.

Figure 4. Oxygen-dependent antibiotic resistance profile of B. cenocepacia H111.

Figure 4

Discs containing 30 µg Kanamycin, 30 µg Tetracycline or 10 µg Gentamycin, respectively, were placed on a plate containing B. cenocepacia H111 strain. Plates were incubated aerobically (black) or micro-oxically (grey) and mean halo diameters were determined. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

Oxygen availability affects metabolic pathways

The metabolism of B. cenocepacia H111 grown under aerobic and micro-oxic conditions was compared using Biolog plates for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) utilization. In these assays the strain's ability to oxidize 190 carbon and 95 nitrogen substrates was tested. An overview of all significant differences in C and N-source utilization under aerobic versus micro-oxic conditions is presented in Table 1. Interestingly, H111 was able to metabolize approximately 70% of the tested C- sources and around 90% of the investigated N-sources. We observed that micro-oxic cells grew to a 4-fold higher optical density (OD600) on inosine and to a 2-fold greater OD on adenosine, tricarballylic acid, malonic acid and succinamic acid compared to aerobically growing cells. For the utilization of N-sources we found a 2-fold increased respiration of ethylendiamine and D, L-α- amino-caprylic acid under micro-oxia.

Table 1. List of carbon- and nitrogen compounds that were differentially used in micro-oxic versus aerobic conditions.

Aerobiosis Micro-oxia
Plates 3×increased 2×increased 4×increased 2×increased
Glycyl-L-aspartic acid α-hydroxy glutaric acid-γ lactone Inosine Adenosine
C-source Propionic acid Tricarballylic acid
2-hydroxy benzoic acid Malonic acid
β-hydroxy butyric acid 2-deoxy-D-ribose
L-Lysine Succinamic acid
N-source Alloxan Ethylendiamine
D-glucosamine D,L-α-amino-caprylic acid
Guanine
Agmatine

Biolog plates PM1 and PM2a were used for C-source profiling and plate PM3b for N-sources utilization.

Global transcript and protein expression changes in response to low oxygen

To investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms of the observed phenotypic alterations under micro-oxic conditions we performed a transcriptomic as well as a proteomic analysis. For a global profiling of transcript and protein levels, aerobic and micro-oxic cells were grown to the late exponential phase (OD600 of 0.8 and 0.4, respectively, Figure 1). Total protein extracts and RNA were obtained from matched samples and further processed (see Methods). To enable detection of low abundance proteins, samples were subfractionated and analyzed using an exclusion list approach [29]. The analysis of cytoplasmic, extracellular and membrane fractions identified a total of 2128 proteins (1726 in oxia, 1911 in micro-oxia). We used DESeq [30] to generate a list of differentially expressed proteins (or genes, see below), ranked according to statistical significance (see Methods). Of the top 58 differentially expressed proteins (Figure 5) the majority (41) were up-regulated in micro-oxia. A global transcript profile analysis of the same samples identified 3806 and 4133 genes expressed aerobically and micro-oxically, respectively. Of the 123 top differentially expressed genes identified by DESeq, 102 were up-regulated in micro-oxia. Importantly, of the 58 differentially expressed proteins, 51 were also found to be similarly regulated at the transcript level. Altogether, we obtained a list of 176 genes and/or proteins that were differentially regulated by low-oxygen (Table 2). Among them, 139 genes/proteins (78%) were up-regulated in micro-oxia, including several transporters (BCAL0447, BCAS0081, BCAS0451, BCAS0602) and outer membrane proteins, genes involved in synthesis of the EPS cepacian (BCAM1004-1005 and BCAM1010), several proteases (Table 2) and an isocitrate lyase (ICL, BCAL2118). Several genes/proteins involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging such as catalases, the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase AhpC and several thioredoxins showed increased expression in low-oxygen conditions. Among the highly up-regulated transcriptional regulators was the FNR-type regulator BCAM0049 as well as the rpoS homolog BCAM1259. A functional classification based on proNOG categories of the EggNOG resource [31] (see Methods) revealed that genes/proteins involved in post-translational modification, protein turnover and chaperones (category O) are over-represented in the list of genes/proteins that are up-regulated by low oxygen. In contrast, the functional categories “cell motility (category N)” and “inorganic ion transport and metabolism (category P) are enriched in the dataset of genes/proteins down-regulated in micro-oxia.

Figure 5. Differential protein expression under micro-oxic and aerobic conditions.

Figure 5

MA plot showing the log2 fold change in protein expression of B. cenocepacia H111 grown under micro-oxic versus aerobic conditions. The top regulated proteins are shown in color: proteins with increased expression under micro-oxic conditions are indicated in red, down-regulated proteins in green.

Table 2. List of 176 B. cenocepacia H111 genes/proteins that showed differential expression in micro-oxic (M) conditions compared to aerobic (A) conditions (DESeq analysis, p-value<0.15 for proteomics and p-value<0.2 for RNA-Seq).

Locus IDa Orthologs J2315b Descriptiona Tpc Proteome FC(M/A)d RNASeq FC(M/A)e
Amino acid transport and metabolism
CCE49364 BCAL0010 Phenylalanine-4-hydroxylase 3.2 1.4
CCE53410 BCAL0705 D-alanine aminotransferase -1.2 17.4
CCE52708 BCAL2198 Cysteine desulfurase, IscS subfamily −7.5 −2.4
CCE50178 BCAL2213 Oligopeptidase A 1.5 11.7
CCE48700 BCAM1111 Ornithine decarboxylase 6.1 2.5
CCE48699 BCAM1112 Arginine decarboxylase/Ornithine decarboxylase 6.0 2.2
CCE47458 BCAM1306 Amino acid permease TM nd 16.6
CCE47406 BCAM1353 Alanine dehydrogenase nd M only
CCE46974 BCAM1735 Glucose dehydrogenase, membrane-bound,flavoprotein TM −60.3 −1.4
CCE53212 BCAM2094 Glutamine synthetase family protein nd 15.1
CCE47595 BCAM2482 Agmatinase nd 19.8
CCE51862 BCAS0081 ABC transporter nd 27.9
CCE52306 BCAS0451 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein nd 19.4
CCE52596 BCAS0602 Permease of the metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily TM nd M only
Energy production and conversion
CCE49315 BCAL0052 D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase nd 15.0
CCE48192 BCAL0522 Flagellum-specific ATP synthase FliI nd A only
CCE48177 BCAL0536 Ferredoxin–NADP(+) reductase 3.1 1.4
CCE53334 BCAL0785 Cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase subunit I TM 3.1 6.7
CCE50746 BCAL1831 Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3.1 1.3
CCE52795 BCAL2118 Isocitrate lyase 7.5 24.9
CCE49032 BCAL2685 Sulfite reductase [NADPH] hemoprotein β-component −16.9 −1.5
CCE51244 BCAL3285 Flavohemoprotein nd 51.7
CCE46730 BCAM0175 Malate:quinone oxidoreductase S −8.4 −3.6
CCE47517 BCAM1250 Acetyl-CoA hydrolase 9.0 5.5
CCE47209 BCAM1537 Putative oxidoreductase YncB 6.0 9.4
CCE47172 BCAM1570 Alcohol dehydrogenase 4.7 7.6
CCE47153 BCAM1581 Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP] 8.0 5.6
CCE46975 BCAM1734 Glucose dehydrogenase S −7.4 −8.3
CCE53213 BCAM2093 Salicylate hydroxylase nd 28.5
CCE46457 BCAM2710 Protein acetyltransferase 19.5 1.9
CCE51861 BCAS0080 FAD-dependent NAD(P)-disulphide oxidoreductase nd 28.1
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
CCE47622 BCAM2458 Adenosine deaminase nd 31.2
CCE48624 BCAM0402 Cytidine/deoxycytidylate deaminase family protein nd 20.8
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
CCE51300 BCAL3342 Phosphoglycerate mutase 1.8 −19.1
CCE46772 BCAM0154 4-deoxy-L-threo-5-hexosulose-uronate ketol-isomerase nd 16.9
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
CCE49767 BCAL2975 Periplasmic molybdate-binding domain protein nd 17.3
CCE49194 BCAM0010 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase 2.9 1.7
Lipid transport and metabolism
CCE49544 BCAL1863 Polyhydroxyalkanoic acid synthase 6.2 1.4
CCE48735 BCAM1005 O-antigen acetylase TM nd M only
CCE53016 BCAM2232 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase siderophore nd −38.2
Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
CCE49086 BCAL0231 Translation elongation factor G 1.4 9.9
Transcription
CCE49231 BCAL0124 Flagellar transcriptional activator FlhD nd −19.1
CCE48084 BCAL0625 Transcriptional regulator M only 1.6
CCE51487 BCAL1210 Transcriptional regulators, LysR family nd 14.8
CCE46853 BCAM0049 Transcriptional regulator, CRP family 9.3 3.8
CCE46759 BCAM0167 Transcriptional regulator, LysR family nd 21.4
CCE48623 BCAM0403 Acetyltransferase nd 22.9
CCE48936 BCAM0751 Transcriptional regulator, LysR family nd 11.7
CCE47511 BCAM1257 Transcriptional regulator, MerR family nd M only
CCE47508 BCAM1259 RpoD-related RND polymerase sigma factor nd 26.4
CCE47210 BCAM1536 Transcriptional regulator, TetR family 1.7 20.7
CCE52597 BCAS0603 Transcriptional regulator, AraC family nd 28.1
CCE53209 Transcriptional regulator, TetR family nd 14.6
Replication, recombination and repair
CCE52866 BCAL2278 Transposase nd 9.7
CCE47509 BCAM1258 Putative DNA polymerase family X nd 18.5
Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
CCE50995 BCAL0940 Membrane carboxypeptidase (penicillin-binding protein) TM nd 11.0
CCE51437 BCAL1258 Membrane-bound murein transglycosylase D precursor −35.0 1.5
CCE47918 BCAL1493 Putative transmembrane protein −3 −1.5
CCE50748 BCAL1829 Outer membrane protein W precursor S 6.4 3.8
CCE50709 BCAL2645 Outer membrane protein TM 3.1 −1.2
CCE49628 BCAL2783 Cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase 5.4 3.6
CCE49806 BCAL3008 Outer membrane protein (porin) S 2.1 2.1
CCE51186 BCAL3204 Peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein precursor S −2.7 −1.3
CCE48736 BCAM1004 GDP-mannose 4,6 dehydratase M only 12.2
CCE48728 BCAM1010 UTP–glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase M only 2.7
CCE47356 BCAM1398 Outer membrane protein (porin) S −3.4 −4.1
CCE46444 BCAM2723 Outer membrane porin, OprD family S nd 20.1
Cell motility
CCE51168 BCAL0142 Flagellar biosynthesis protein FlhF 4.4 −44.9
CCE48144 BCAL0567 Flagellar hook protein FlgE −2.2 −10.8
CCE48143 BCAL0568 Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgF nd −20.2
CCE48141 BCAL0570 Flagellar L-ring protein FlgH S −2.1 −20.8
CCE48139 BCAL0572 Flagellar protein FlgJ [peptidoglycan hydrolase] nd −24.7
CCE47986 BCAL3503 Flagellar biosynthesis protein FliP TM nd −19.5
CCE47983 BCAL3506 Flagellar motor switch protein FliM −1.4 −20.7
CCE53442 BCAL1677 Type 1 fimbriae major subunit FimA S 1.8 M only
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
CCE48216 BCAL0500 ATP-dependent hsl protease ATP-binding subunit HslU 1.3 13.3
CCE51547 BCAL1070 Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C-like protein S 1.0 15.0
CCE51462 BCAL1233 Molecular chaperone (small heat shock protein) 2.1 32.5
CCE51461 BCAL1234 Molecular chaperone (small heat shock protein) 5.3 37.4
CCE49486 BCAL1919 ClpB protein 4.3 20.9
CCE49077 BCAL2730 ATP-dependent protease ATP-binding subunit ClpA 3.9 7.2
CCE49078 BCAL2731 ATP-dependent Clp protease adaptor protein ClpS 2.5 11.0
CCE49625 BCAL2780 Thioredoxin domain-containing protein EC-YbbN 1.7 10.6
CCE52629 BCAL3146 Heat shock protein 60 family chaperone GroEL 2.7 6.7
CCE51225 BCAL3269 Chaperone protein DnaJ 1.7 12.2
CCE51226 BCAL3270 Chaperone protein DnaK 2.0 8.9
CCE51227 BCAL3271 Thiol-disulfide isomerase and thioredoxins nd 14.3
CCE51228 BCAL3272 Heat shock protein GrpE 1.1 9.7
CCE47165 BCAM0309 Cell division protein FtsH TM nd 17.5
CCE48963 BCAM0727 Membrane protease subunits, stomatin/prohibitin homologs nd 68.6
CCE46962 BCAM1744 Extracellular protease precursor S 1.3 −18.2
CCE52630 BCAS0638 Heat shock protein 60 family co-chaperone GroES 2.2 27.6
CCE52633 BCAS0641 serine protease nd 56.1
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
CCE49312 BCAL0055 Copper-translocating P-type ATPase TM 1.5 11.5
CCE52829 BCAL0447 Ferric iron ABC transporter, permease protein TM nd M only
CCE51464 BCAL1231 Integral membrane protein TerC TM nd M only
CCE49029 BCAL2682 Sulfate adenylyltransferase subunit 2 −14.2 −2.5
CCE51255 BCAL3299 Catalase/Peroxidase 2.4 1.9
CCE48540 BCAM0491 Outer membrane vitamin B12 receptor BtuB S −24.1 −2.1
CCE48794 BCAM0948 Outer membrane protein NosA precursor −8.0 −14.2
CCE47584 BCAM1187 Ferrichrome-iron receptor A only −10.9
CCE47171 BCAM1571 Zinc-regulated outer membrane receptor M only 37.1
CCE49127 BCAM2007 Ferrichrome-iron receptor S A only −13.8
CCE53024 BCAM2224 Outer membrane receptor for ferric-pyochelin FptA S nd −20.2
CCE47643 BCAM2439 Ferrichrome-iron receptor S −3.0 −7.3
CCE52627 BCAS0635 Manganese catalase nd M only
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
CCE53019 BCAM2230 Dihydroaeruginoate synthetase PchE nd −14.3
CCE53020 Pyochelin synthetase PchF nd −27.3
Signal transduction mechanisms
CCE53457 BCAL1663 Serine protein kinase (PrkA protein) 19.5 16.5
CCE52508 BCAM0276 Universal stress protein UspA 4.1 14.1
CCE50874 BCAM0877 Diadenosine tetraphosphatase nd M only
CCE46268 BCAM2563 Aerotaxis sensor receptor protein TM nd 10.3
Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
CCE47881 BCAL1529 Type II/IV secretion system ATPase TadZ 22.4 1.5
CCE53120 BCAM2140 HlyD family secretion protein TM nd 30.7
Others
CCE49314 BCAL0053 Transcriptional regulator, PadR family 1.1 12.3
CCE51109 BCAL0213 Phenylacetate-CoA oxygenase, PaaJ subunit nd −34.8
CCE51108 BCAL0214 Phenylacetate-CoA oxygenase, PaaI subunit 2.9 −10.4
CCE46576 BCAL0342 Uncharacterized protein ImpC 2.2 −1.8
CCE46575 BCAL0343 Uncharacterized protein ImpD 2.2 −1.0
CCE48020 BCAL0683 Hypothetical protein I35_1851 nd 20.6
CCE53333 BCAL0786 Hypothetical protein I35_7268 TM nd 10.0
CCE51079 BCAL0860 Staphylolytic protease preproenzyme LasA nd 14.3
CCE50996 BCAL0939 Gfa-like protein nd 12.2
CCE51463 BCAL1232 Hypothetical protein I35_5360 nd M only
CCE51401 BCAL1294 VgrG protein 13.8 2.6
CCE51631 BCAL1463 Ribonuclease BN TM nd 21.7
CCE53456 BCAL1664 Hypothetical protein I35_7395 nd 16.7
CCE53455 BCAL1665 SpoVR-like protein nd 16.4
CCE50747 BCAL1830 Dioxygenase,2-nitropropane dioxygenase-like 19.1 1.8
CCE50719 BCAL1857 Hypothetical protein I35_4602 TM nd 16.0
CCE52700 BCAL2206 Granule-associated protein 3.1 9.5
CCE50568 BCAL2439 Hypothetical protein I35_4448 TM nd 12.9
CCE49604 BCAL2760 UPF0434 protein YcaR −3.0 A only
CCE49988 BCAL3178 Transcriptional regulator 2.8 1.7
CCE51204 BCAL3243 Capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis/export protein −8.6 2.2
CCE46874 BCAM0028 Hypothetical protein I35_0684 nd 31.2
CCE46761 BCAM0165 Hypothetical protein I35_0571 nd −14.1
CCE46721 BCAM0185 Lectin BclC M only 7.1
CCE48935 BCAM0752 Hydrolase-related protein nd 15.2
CCE47460 BCAM1304 Phage-related protein nd 10.6
CCE47459 BCAM1305 hypothetical protein I35_1271 nd 10.8
CCE47408 BCAM1351 DnaK suppressor protein nd 16.2
CCE47407 BCAM1352 DNA-dependent DNA polymerase family X nd 27.2
CCE47250 BCAM1500 Universal stress protein family 5.4 5.6
CCE47213 BCAM1534 Chromosome segregation ATPases nd 43.6
CCE47212 BCAM1535 Hypothetical protein I35_1024 S nd 18.0
CCE47173 BCAM1569 Neuraminidase (sialidase) S nd 13.9
CCE50317 BCAM1926 CBS domain protein 1.2 10.2
CCE53123 BCAM2137 Transcriptional regulatory protein nd 20.0
CCE53121 BCAM2139 Eukaryotic putative RNA-binding region RNP-1 signature nd M only
CCE53091 BCAM2167 Hypothetical protein I35_7022 nd 15.6
CCE53041 BCAM2210 Hypothetical protein I35_6972 TM nd M only
CCE47618 BCAM2462 Outer membrane protein (porin) S nd 55.2
CCE47617 BCAM2463 Hypothetical protein I35_1430 nd 10.2
CCE51782 BCAS0002 Chromosome (plasmid) partitioning protein ParB 1.3 19.1
CCE51864 BCAS0082 Hydrolases of the alpha/beta superfamily TM nd 21.1
CCE52109 BCAS0293 AidA 2.2 M only
CCE52595 BCAS0601 Putative ATP/GTP-binding protein nd 28.5
CCE52677 BCAS0723 Putative cytoplasmic protein nd 30.7
CCE46207 Outer membrane protein (porin) S 2.2 2.0
CCE46671 Hypothetical protein I35_0480 nd −9.6
CCE47170 Hypothetical protein I35_0982 nd 52.5
CCE47794 Hypothetical protein I35_1612 nd M only
CCE48729 Hypothetical protein I35_2566 TM nd M only
CCE50639 Shufflon-specific DND recombinase nd 10.6
CCE51201 Capsular polysaccharide export system protein KpsE TM −12.1 1.2
CCE52058 Quinone oxidoreductase (NADPH:quinone reductase) nd 14.0
CCE52231 Histone acetyltransferase HPA2 nd M only
CCE52465 29 kDa antigen 3.6 −2.3
CCE52505 Regulator of competence-specific genes M only 15.4
CCE52619 TPR repeat protein, SEL1 subfamily S nd 17.1
CCE52635 Hypothetical protein I35_6546 nd 16.3
CCE52659 Tannase precursor nd 24.9
CCE52669 Hypothetical protein I35_6580 nd 23.4
CCE53181 Cyclohexanone monooxygenase nd 31.2
CCE53450 Large exoproteins involved in heme utilization 3.8 1.9
a

Nomenclature and description according to GenBank file CAFQ01000001.1.

b

Orthologs were identified as described in the Material and Methods section.

c

Predicted topology (Tp) according to SignalP v4.0 (secreted proteins, S) and TMHMM v2.0 (transmembrane, TM).

d

Fold change (FC) of protein expression, comparing micro-oxically (M) with aerobically (A) grown wild-type strain.

e

Fold change (FC) of transcript expression, comparing micro-oxically (M) with aerobically (A) grown wild-type strain.

nd: The gene was not identified on protein level.

M only and A only: The gene/protein was detected only micro-oxically (M) or aerobically (A).

The proNOG categories are indicated and the 58 differentially expressed proteins are indicated in bold. The overlap in low oxygen regulation with strain J2315 (Sass et al., 2013) is indicated in italics.

To further validate the global analysis data, the up-regulation of several genes was confirmed by qPCR (Table S3). These included up-regulation of BCAM0049 and BCAM1259 expression as well as increased expression of the protease gene BCAL1919 (clpB), the cytochrome d ubiquinol kinase gene BCAL0785, the sugar transferase gene involved in cepacian synthesis (BCAM1010) and the ICL encoding gene (BCAL2118). In addition, transcriptional lacZ fusions to promoter regions of selected genes up-regulated in micro-oxic conditions were constructed and measured (Figure S2). The promoter of a gene involved in cepacian biosynthesis (sugar transferase wcaJ), the thioredoxin BCAL2780, the rpoS homolog (BCAM1259) and the lectin encoding gene BCAM0185 showed increased activity when cells were grown with low oxygen (Figure S2). As a control we used PcepI-lacZ transcriptional fusion and confirmed that the expression of the AHL encoding gene cepI was not affected by oxygen availability (confirming our RNA-Seq data).

Discussion

At present very little is known of how B. cenocepacia strains can adapt to the micro-oxic/anoxic environment within biofilms in the CF lung [7][9], [32]. While the CF pathogen P. aeruginosa uses denitrification and fermentation of arginine to generate energy for growth and survival in an environment depleted of oxygen [16], [17], we could only detect very few orthologs of the respective genes involved in these processes in the genomes of B. cenocepacia strains. Denitrification genes were exclusively found in the genomes of members of the “pseudomallei” group, namely B. thailandensis, B. pseudomallei and B. mallei. Only strains of B. thailandensis, B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, B. ambifaria, B. xenovorans, B. phymatum and B. phytofirmans, harbor genes that potentially allow these species to ferment arginine to gain energy (1 mol of ATP per mol of arginine). In accordance with these findings it has been reported that the diversity of Burkholderia strains growing under anoxic conditions in soils is very low [33].

The facultative intracellular pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis has recently been shown to adapt to and recover from hypoxia using isocitrate lyase (ICL)-mediated production of succinate [34]. ICL is a glyoxylate shunt enzyme, which generates succinate whose secretion was proposed to help maintain membrane potential and ATP synthesis. The produced succinate is also a substrate of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) in the TCA cycle which is important for the electron transport chain by coupling carbon flow to ATP synthesis [35]. The gene encoding ICL has been shown to be up-regulated in persister cells in B. cenocepacia biofilms [36]. The authors of this study suggested that surviving persister cells downregulate the TCA cycle to avoid production of ROS and at the same time activate an alternative pathway, the glyoxylate shunt. Employing a combined RNA-Seq and proteomics approach we found that the two ICL genes present in the H111 genome as well as genes/proteins involved in ROS scavenging such as catalases, AhpC and several thioredoxins were up-regulated by low oxygen. Given that the same genes were also up-regulated in micro-oxia in strain J2315 [21], it is tempting to speculate that this pathway is used by B. cenocepacia to sustain production of ATP under micro-oxic conditions.

A phenotypical characterization revealed that micro-oxic cells grew better with purines as C-source. The up-regulation of two adenosine deaminases (Table 2 and Table S1) which are key enzymes of purine metabolism and convert adenosine to inosine suggest a role of purine metabolism in micro-oxia. Interestingly, a recent report on hepatocarcinoma-derived cells showed that purines such as inosine and adenosine have a cytoprotective effect and can serve as an alternative source of energy to produce ATP during hypoxic conditions [37]. The ribose moiety of adenosine and purine could be used as a precursor for the phosphorylated glycolytic intermediates in reactions catalyzed by the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway. Among the genes up-regulated in micro-oxia (Table S1) we also found several nucleoside phosphorylases which catalyse the reversible phosphorolysis of purine (2′-deoxy)ribonucleosides to free bases and (2′-deoxy)ribose 1-phosphates. This could represent another possibility for B. cenocepacia to generate energy under micro-oxic conditions.

In this study we showed that micro-oxic conditions promoted biofilm formation of B. cenocepacia. Similar observations have been made for P. aeruginosa, which produces more alginate when oxygen is limiting [38][40]. Our global expression analyses revealed the up-regulation of three regions potentially responsible for increased biofilm formation under micro-oxic conditions: i) the EPS cepacian encoding gene cluster BCAM1004-10 [41], [42] ii) the lectin gene BCAM0185 [43], and iii) the gene encoding the large surface protein BapA, which was previously shown to be important for biofilm formation [43].

The observation that cells growing micro-oxically were more resistant to several antibiotics is probably due to their slower growth rate compared to aerobically growing cells. Muir et al. showed that the higher the growth rate of cells at the time of antibiotic addition, the greater the growth-inhibitory effect [44].

The effect of low-oxygen tension on gene expression was one of the nine conditions tested by Sass and colleagues in B. cenocepacia strain J2315 [21]. Although the experimental settings used in their study were very different from ours (i) shift versus run out experiment, ii) CampyGen Compact gas generating system versus controlled gas atmosphere, iii) 6% versus 0.5% oxygen, iv) strain J2315 versus H111) and different analysis technologies were used (microarray versus RNA-Seq), there was a good overlap between the two data sets. In fact, 55 of the 176 H111 genes/proteins reported here were also differentially expressed in response to low oxygen in strain J2315 (Table S2). Among them are universal stress proteins, the protease ClpB, the isocitrate lyase BCAL2118, arginine/ornithine decarboxylases, the cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase and several membrane proteins. In line with the observation that strain H111 produces reduced amounts of siderophores in micro-oxia, several TonB dependent receptors were down-regulated in micro-oxic conditions. The lxa locus as well as the cable pilus cluster (cbl), which are both induced in strain J2315, are absent in strain H111. Other gene clusters for flagellar and chemotaxis proteins were up-regulated only in strain J2315. Among the genes specifically induced in strain H111 we found the fimbriae encoding gene fimA (BCAL1677), an adenosine deaminase (BCAM2458), several porins (BCAM2723, BCAL3007, BCAM2462) and several ABC transporters. Among the transcriptional regulators highly up-regulated in micro-oxia in both studies was the FNR-type regulator BCAM0049 (Table 2). Orthologous proteins have been shown to sense the oxygen tension and control gene expression under low oxygen conditions in several organisms [28], [45]. The P. aeruginosa FNR-type regulator ANR is known to positively control expression of denitrification and arginine fermentation genes. This regulator could also play an important role in the regulation of genes in micro-oxic conditions.

In conclusion, we have shown that B. cenocepacia H111 can grow with as little as 0.1% oxygen but is not able to grow anaerobically. Since P. aeruginosa grows anaerobically and has been shown to occupy deeper sites within wounds [46] it appears likely that B. cenocepacia may occupy a different niche where oxygen is limited but not totally absent. Our study provides a list of the most significant differentially expressed genes/proteins in micro-oxically versus aerobically grown cells and opens new avenues in the understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the physiology and regulation of the in vivo relevant micro-oxic lifestyle of B. cenocepacia.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

B. cenocepacia wild type H111 [22], [47], [48] was grown under aerobic (21% oxygen) and micro-oxic conditions (0.1% to 5% oxygen) at 37°C in LB Lennox broth (Difco) or ABC Minimal Medium containing citrate as carbon source [49]. Aerobic cultures were grown with rigorous shaking (220 rpm) in 500-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml medium or, for RNA-Seq and proteomics experiments, in 1-L Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml medium. Micro-oxic liquid cultures were grown under a nitrogen gas atmosphere that contained 5% or 0.5% or 0.1% oxygen with moderate shaking (80 rpm) in 500-ml rubber-stoppered serum bottles containing 50 ml medium. The gas phase (e. g 0.5% O2, 99.5% N2) was exchanged every 8–14 hours. For the cultivation of bacteria on plates, micro-oxic conditions were created using the CampyGen Compact gas generating system (oxoid) by quickly changing the paper sachet every 24 hours and keeping the exposure to atmospheric oxygen at a minimum.

Phenotypical analysis

Biofilm formation was quantified in a microtiter dish assay as described by Huber et al. [50]. Since micro-oxic and aerobic cells reached different optical densities (OD), we used the biofilm index (BI) to compare the amounts of biofilm formed. The BI was calculated as the mean percentage ratio between OD570 after crystal violet staining and OD550 measured before incubating the cells with crystal violet which reflects the total cell number [51]. The formation of pellicles was assessed in NYG medium (0.5% peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, 2% glycerol) according to Fazli et al., 2011 [52]. Proteolytic activity was quantified based on the method described by Schmid et al [53] growing cells in NYG medium at 37°C to late exponential growth phase and using azocasein (5 mg/ml, in 50 mM Tris-Cl pH 8) for 60 min at 37°C as substrate. For quantification of lipases and cellulases, the sterile culture supernatant was incubated with buffer 1 (1 volume 0.3% p-nitrophenyl palmitate in isopropanol and 9 volumes of 0.2% sodiumdesoxycholate and 0.1% gum arabicum in 50 mM sodiumphosphate buffer pH 8) and 1% carboxymethylcellulose, respectively. After incubation, the absorbance was measured at 410 nm and 575 nm, respectively [50]. A Bradford assay (Coomassie Plus™, Thermo Scientific/Pierce) with BSA as standard was used to determine the total protein concentration in extracts derived from both aerobic and micro-oxic cultures. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on agar plates where bacteria were homogeneously spread over the surface of the agar plate. Antibiotic discs (kanamycin 30 µg, tetracycline 30 µg, gentamycin 10 µg; Alere GmbH) were placed in the center of the plate. Swarming and swimming were tested by inoculating cells onto plates containing ABC medium supplemented with 0.1% casamino acids that were solidified with 0.4% and 0.3% agar, respectively. Plates were incubated for 2 days. Siderophores production was measured on CAS plates as described previously [54]. All phenotypic assays were performed at least in triplicate.

Biolog analysis

B. cenocepacia was streaked on R2A agar plates and grown overnight at 37°C. From this plate, colonies were picked up and suspended in the GN/GP-IF at the required optical density. The suspensions were then inoculated on Biolog plates PM1 and PM2a for the carbon sources and PM3b for the nitrogen sources (Biolog, Hayward, CA). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h fully aerated or for 36 h under micro-oxic conditions using CampyGen jars (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The optical density was measured using a plate reader; instances where a >50% OD600 difference was observed between micro-oxic and aerobic cells were deemed significant [55]. Each condition was tested in triplicate.

RNA-Seq and data analysis

Total RNA from B. cenocepacia strain H111 grown with 21% or 0.5% oxygen in complex LB medium to the end of the exponential phase (OD600 of 0.8 and 0.4, respectively, Figure 1) was extracted using a modified hot acid phenol protocol [56]. The removal of genomic DNA using DNAseI (Promega) was verified by a PCR reaction with 40 cycles. The samples were then further purified using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and the RNA quality was checked using RNA Nano Chips (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer; RIN >8). The RNA samples were poly(A)-tailed using poly(A) polymerase. Then, the 5′PPP were removed using tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP). Afterwards, an RNA adapter was ligated to the 5′-monophosphate of the RNA. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using an oligo(dT)-adapter primer and the M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). The resulting cDNA was PCR-amplified to about 20–30 ng/µl using a high fidelity DNA polymerase. The cDNA was purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics) and was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. The primers used for PCR amplification were designed for TruSeq sequencing according to the instructions of Illumina. Illumina single-end sequencing was performed on a HiSeq2000 instrument. The sequence reads were processed and then mapped to the B. cenocepacia H111 genome using CLC Genomics Workbench v4.9 (CLC bio) allowing up to 2 mismatches per read. The mapped reads (or spectral counts, see below) were analyzed using the DESeq software [30]. DESeq models gene/protein expression with a negative binomial distribution and outputs a list of differentially expressed genes/proteins ranked according to statistical significance. We report the top 123 differentially expressed genes (p-value cut-off <0.2), i.e. approx. 2,5% of the genes found actively expressed. This model is more robust against over-identifying candidate regulated genes based on fold-change alone, which can in particular be problematic for genes that are identified with few sequencing reads (common for Burkholderia with their high GC content, [57]) or spectra. We only considered genes with five or more reads for differential analysis. For functional annotation of H111 genes, we relied on the eggNOG resource [31] and transferred the functional annotations from the respective J2315 orthologs as described [53]. The RNA-Seq raw data files are accessible through the GEO Series accession number GSE48585.

Preparation of protein samples

Extracellular proteins and subcellular fractions were prepared as described previously [53]. Cells were lysed by two consecutive passes through a French Press homogenizer (Hypramag/Aminco), and cell debris was removed by 15 min centrifugation at 4000 g. Total cell membranes were subsequently harvested by ultracentrifugation for 1 h at 80000 g, 4°C. The pellet containing total membrane proteins was dissolved in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2% SDS by incubation at 50°C for 1 h. The cell lysate supernatant containing soluble cytoplasmic proteins was extracted with 6 volumes of ice-cold acetone at −20°C overnight. The precipitated proteins were harvested by centrifugation at 20000 g and dissolved in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% SDS. Total protein concentration was determined according to Bradford (Coomassie Plus™ protein assay, Pierce). Approximately 15 mg total protein for each extracellular (EC), cytoplasmic (Cyt) and total membrane (TM) fractions were separated by 1D SDS-PAGE on 12.5% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue (Serva). Individual protein lanes were cut into ten slices and immediately subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion [58].

Mass spectrometry, protein identification and differential expression analysis

Peptides were separated by RP-HPLC and analyzed by a hybrid LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) interfaced with a nanoelectrospray source. Mass spectrometric detection was performed in data-dependent mode. Precursor mass spectra were acquired at the Orbitrap mass analyzer with a scan range from m/z 300 to 1,600; resolution was set to 60,000 at m/z 400. Mass spectra were processed with Xcalibur 2.0.7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and peak lists were generated with msConvert (version 3.0.4388) [59]. Fragment ion mass spectra were searched with MS-GF+ (MS-GFDB v7747) against a sequence database consisting of 7,258 B. cenocepacia strain H111 proteins (accession CAFQ00000000.1) and 259 common contaminants (e.g. human keratin, trypsin). Spectra were searched for a match to fully-tryptic and semi-tryptic peptides with a mass tolerance of 10ppm. Carbamidomethylation was set as fixed modification for all cysteines while oxidation of methionines, deamidation of asparagines and glutamines as well as cyclization of N-terminal glutamines were considered as optional modifications.

Based on the target-decoy search strategy [60], a stringent score cutoff was determined that resulted in an estimated FDR of less than 0.2% at the PSM level. PSMs above this cutoff were subjected to a PeptideClassifier analysis [61] and only peptides that unambiguously identify one protein (either class 1a or 3a) were considered. We furthermore required at least 3 independent spectra or two spectra from two distinct peptides for protein identification. Each subcellular fraction was measured once with a discovery run followed by a subsequent exclusion list run (precursor ions identified in the discovery run were excluded from fragmentation in the exclusion run) [29]. Thereby, about 15% more proteins (272), all preferentially lower abundant, could be added by the exclusion list approach to those identified over all respective first runs (1854, Figure S3). This resulted in a total of 2128 identified proteins at an estimated FDR of less than 1% (0.98%). Total spectral counts for each protein were used for a differential expression analysis with the R package DESeq (version 1.6.1, [30]). Due to the lower number of spectral counts compared to sequenced reads, we chose a more lenient cut-off of p<0.15 to select the 58 top-ranked differentially expressed proteins for further analysis (roughly 2.7% of all proteins expressed). Protein abundance was estimated according to the method of Schrimpf et al. [62] (Figure S3). Proteomics data associated with this manuscript can be downloaded from the ProteomeXchange under accession number PXD000270. Signal peptide predictions from SignalP (version 4.0), and transmembrane domain predictions from TMHMM (version 2.0; both from the CBS, Denmark), were used for a combined topology prediction: Proteins without a predicted transmembrane domain after a predicted signal peptide cleavage site are considered secreted. Proteins with one or more predicted transmembrane domains after a predicted signal peptide cleavage site or without a predicted signal peptide cleavage site are assumed to be transmembrane proteins.

Construction and assessment of transcriptional lacZ fusions

For construction of transcriptional lacZ fusions, vector pSU11p [53] was used. The promoter regions of BCAL2780, BCAM1259, wcaJ genes were first amplified using the primers listed in Table S4 and cloned into vector pCR 2.1 TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After sequence verification, the promoter probes were cut and cloned into pSU11p using HindIII and XhoI. The resulting plasmids pPBCAL2780-lacZ, pPBCAM1259-lacZ and pPwcaJ-lacZ were transferred by triparental mating into B. cenocepacia strain H111 and ß-galactosidase activity was determined both under micro-oxic and aerobic conditions by the Miller method [63]. Briefly, the strains were grown overnight in LB broth, then subcultured in LB medium and incubated for 2 days (aerobic cultures) or 4 days (micro-oxic cultures). The experiment was run in triplicate. ß-galactosidase activity was also visually inspected on LB plates containing 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactoside (X-Gal) (Sigma). Bacterial strains, plasmid and primers used in this study are listed in Table S4.

qPCR analyses

The expression of H111 orthologs of J2315 genes BCAM1259, BCAL0785, BCAL1919, BCAM1010, BCAM0049 and BCAL2118 was analyzed with a Mx3000P instrument using Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR® Green QPCR Master Mix (Agilent, Switzerland) and cDNA prepared from biological replicates as template. Each reaction contained 12.5 µl 2× Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR® Green QPCR Master Mix, 0.7 µM of individual primers and 15 or 7.5 or 3.5 ng of cDNA in a total volume of 25 µl. Reactions were run in triplicates. The relative expression ratio was calculated according to Pfaffl [64] using the primary sigma factor rpoD (BCAM0918) as housekeeping gene. The primers used are listed in Table S4.

Statistical analyses

Continuous normally distributed data were analyzed by using an independent sample t-test. P-values were determined using SPSS software, version 21.0. The over-representation analysis of EggNOG functional categories was carried out using Fisher's Exact tests.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Decreased siderophore production in micro-oxic conditions. Siderophore production of B. cenocepacia H111 grown under aerobic (black bar) and micro-oxic (grey bar) conditions was measured on CAS plates. The measured halo diameter corresponds to siderophore activity. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Validation of four micro-oxic induced genes by lacZ fusions. The activity of BCAL2780 (thioredoxin domain containing protein), BCAM1259 (sigma factor), wcaJ (CCE50896, sugar transferase in cepacian cluster II), bclA (lectin) and cepI promoter fusion was determined in the wild type grown in aerobic (black bar) and micro-oxic (grey bar) conditions. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

(TIF)

Figure S3

Proteins identified by the exclusion list approach add 272 preferentially low abundant proteins. The exclusion list approach was successful in adding preferentially lower abundant proteins (red curve) on top of those identified over all discovery runs (blue curve) and allowed us to dig deeper into the proteome. For calculation of the relative protein abundance, see Methods.

(TIF)

Table S1

Shotgun proteomics and RNA-Seq data for all B. cenocepacia H111 genes/proteins grown in micro-oxic (M) conditions and aerobic (A) conditions.

(XLSX)

Table S2

List of 55 B. cenocepacia H111 and J2315 genes that are commonly induced by low oxygen (M) (DESeq analysis, p-value<0.2 for H111, fold change >2 for J2315). The expression in aerobic cells was taken as baseline (A).

(XLSX)

Table S3

Q-PCR results for selected genes.

(XLSX)

Table S4

Bacterial strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Cynthia Sharma and Konrad Förstner (University of Würzburg) for processing our RNA-Seq samples. We thank Martina Lardi for help in statistical analysis and Kirsty Agnoli for assistance in processing Biolog plates. Hans-Martin Fischer is acknowledged for providing access to the gas station at the Microbiology Institute of the ETH Zurich.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project 31003A-143773) to LE and the Swiss SystemsX.ch initiative (grant IPP 2011/121) to CHA and LE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB (2005) The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 144–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mahenthiralingam E, Baldwin A, Dowson CG (2008) Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J Appl Microbiol 104: 1539–1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burns JL (2007) Antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia spp.; H. B, editor. Norfolk: New Horizon.
  • 4. LiPuma JJ, Dasen SE, Nielson DW, Stern RC, Stull TL (1990) Person-to-person transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia between patients with cystic fibrosis. Lancet 336: 1094–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Drevinek P, Mahenthiralingam E (2010) Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 821–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Döring G, Parameswaran IG, Murphy TF (2011) Differential adaptation of microbial pathogens to airways of patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35: 124–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Worlitzsch D, Tarran R, Ulrich M, Schwab U, Cekici A, et al. (2002) Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Invest 109: 317–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yoon SS, Hennigan RF, Hilliard GM, Ochsner UA, Parvatiyar K, et al. (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa anaerobic respiration in biofilms: relationships to cystic fibrosis pathogenesis. Dev Cell 3: 593–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hassett DJ, Cuppoletti J, Trapnell B, Lymar SV, Rowe JJ, et al. (2002) Anaerobic metabolism and quorum sensing by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in chronically infected cystic fibrosis airways: rethinking antibiotic treatment strategies and drug targets. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54: 1425–1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Xu KD, Stewart PS, Xia F, Huang CT, McFeters GA (1998) Spatial physiological heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4035–4039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tunney MM, Field TR, Moriarty TF, Patrick S, Döring G, et al. (2008) Detection of anaerobic bacteria in high numbers in sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177: 995–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Alvarez-Ortega C, Harwood CS (2007) Responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to low oxygen indicate that growth in the cystic fibrosis lung is by aerobic respiration. Mol Microbiol 65: 153–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sabra W, Kim EJ, Zeng AP (2002) Physiological responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to oxidative stress in controlled microaerobic and aerobic cultures. Microbiology 148: 3195–3202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zumft WG (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 533–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yang L, Jelsbak L, Molin S (2011) Microbial ecology and adaptation in cystic fibrosis airways. Environ Microbiol 13: 1682–1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schobert M, Jahn D (2010) Anaerobic physiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the cystic fibrosis lung. Int J Med Microbiol 300: 549–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arai H (2011) Regulation and function of versatile aerobic and anaerobic respiratory metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Front Microbiol 2: article 103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vander Wauven C, Pierard A, Kley-Raymann M, Haas D (1984) Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants affected in anaerobic growth on arginine: evidence for a four-gene cluster encoding the arginine deiminase pathway. J Bacteriol 160: 928–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Eschbach M, Schreiber K, Trunk K, Buer J, Jahn D, et al. (2004) Long-term anaerobic survival of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa via pyruvate fermentation. J Bacteriol 186: 4596–4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lieberman TD, Michel JB, Aingaran M, Potter-Bynoe G, Roux D, et al. (2011) Parallel bacterial evolution within multiple patients identifies candidate pathogenicity genes. Nat Genet 43: 1275–1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sass AM, Schmerk C, Agnoli K, Norville PJ, Eberl L, et al. (2013) The unexpected discovery of a novel low-oxygen-activated locus for the anoxic persistence of Burkholderia cenocepacia . ISME J doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.1036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Geisenberger O, Givskov M, Riedel K, Hoiby N, Tümmler B, et al. (2000) Production of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones by P. aeruginosa isolates from chronic lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184: 273–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wongwanich S, Chotanachan P, Kondo E, Kanai K (1996) Multifactorial pathogenic mechanisms of Burkholderia pseudomallei as suggested from comparison with Burkholderia cepacia . Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 27: 111–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A, Limmathurotsakul D, Korbsrisate S, Day NP, et al. (2010) Effect of colony morphology variation of Burkholderia pseudomallei on intracellular survival and resistance to antimicrobial environments in human macrophages in vitro . BMC Microbiol 10: 303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pitcher RS, Brittain T, Watmough NJ (2002) Cytochrome cbb(3) oxidase and bacterial microaerobic metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans 30: 653–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cosseau C, Batut J (2004) Genomics of the ccoNOQP-encoded cbb3 oxidase complex in bacteria. Arch Microbiol 181: 89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Comolli JC, Donohue TJ (2004) Differences in two Pseudomonas aeruginosa cbb3 cytochrome oxidases. Mol Microbiol 51: 1193–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Galimand M, Gamper M, Zimmermann A, Haas D (1991) Positive FNR-like control of anaerobic arginine degradation and nitrate respiration in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Bacteriol 173: 1598–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kristensen DB, Brond JC, Nielsen PA, Andersen JR, Sorensen OT, et al. (2004) Experimental Peptide Identification Repository (EPIR): an integrated peptide-centric platform for validation and mining of tandem mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics 3: 1023–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11: R106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Powell S, Szklarczyk D, Trachana K, Roth A, Kuhn M, et al. (2012) eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D284–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 199–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pett-Ridge J, Firestone MK (2005) Redox fluctuation structures microbial communities in a wet tropical soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 6998–7007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Watanabe S, Zimmermann M, Goodwin MB, Sauer U, Barry CE (2011) Fumarate reductase activity maintains an energized membrane in anaerobic Mycobacterium tuberculosis . PLoS Pathog 7: e1002287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Eoh H, Rhee KY (2013) Multifunctional essentiality of succinate metabolism in adaptation to hypoxia in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 6554–6559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Van Acker H, Sass A, Bazzini S, De Roy K, Udine C, et al. (2013) Biofilm-grown Burkholderia cepacia complex cells survive antibiotic treatment by avoiding production of reactive oxygen species. PLoS One 8: e58943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Modis K, Gero D, Stangl R, Rosero O, Szijarto A, et al. (2013) Adenosine and inosine exert cytoprotective effects in an in vitro model of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int J Mol Med 31: 437–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bayer AS, Eftekhar F, Tu J, Nast CC, Speert DP (1990) Oxygen-dependent up-regulation of mucoid exopolysaccharide (alginate) production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Infect Immun 58: 1344–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Leitão JH, Sá-Correia I (1993) Oxygen-dependent alginate synthesis and enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Gen Microbiol 139: 441–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Leitão JH, Sá-Correia I (1997) Oxygen-dependent upregulation of transcription of alginate genes algA, algC and algD in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Res Microbiol 148: 37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Herasimenka Y, Cescutti P, Impallomeni G, Campana S, Taccetti G, et al. (2007) Exopolysaccharides produced by clinical strains belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Cyst Fibros 6: 145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ferreira AS, Leitão JH, Silva IN, Pinheiro PF, Sousa SA, et al. (2010) Distribution of cepacian biosynthesis genes among environmental and clinical Burkholderia strains and role of cepacian exopolysaccharide in resistance to stress conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 441–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Inhülsen S, Aguilar C, Schmid N, Suppiger A, Riedel K, et al. (2012) Identification of functions linking quorum sensing with biofilm formation in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. Microbiologyopen 1: 225–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Muir ME, van Heeswyck RS, Wallace BJ (1984) Effect of growth rate on streptomycin accumulation by Escherichia coli and Bacillus megaterium . J Gen Microbiol 130: 2015–2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sawers RG (1991) Identification and molecular characterization of a transcriptional regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 exhibiting structural and functional similarity to the FNR protein of Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 5: 1469–1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Fazli M, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Jorgensen B, Andersen AS, et al. (2009) Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 47: 4084–4089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Römling U, Fiedler B, Bosshammer J, Grothues D, Greipel J, et al. (1994) Epidemiology of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis. J Infect Dis 170: 1616–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Götschlich A, Huber B, Geisenberger O, Togl A, Steidle A, et al. (2001) Synthesis of multiple N-acylhomoserine lactones is wide-spread among the members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Syst Appl Microbiol 24: 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Clark DJ, Maaloe O (1967) DNA Replication and Division Cycle in Escherichia Coli . Journal of Molecular Biology 23: 99–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Huber B, Riedel K, Hentzer M, Heydorn A, Götschlich A, et al. (2001) The cep quorum-sensing system of Burkholderia cepacia H111 controls biofilm formation and swarming motility. Microbiology 147: 2517–2528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Savoia D, Zucca M (2007) Clinical and environmental Burkholderia strains: biofilm production and intracellular survival. Curr Microbiol 54: 440–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Fazli M, O'Connell A, Nilsson M, Niehaus K, Dow JM, et al. (2011) The CRP/FNR family protein Bcam1349 is a c-di-GMP effector that regulates biofilm formation in the respiratory pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia . Mol Microbiol 82: 327–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Schmid N, Pessi G, Deng Y, Aguilar C, Carlier AL, et al. (2012) The AHL- and BDSF-dependent quorum sensing systems control specific and overlapping sets of genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. PLoS One 7: e49966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160: 47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Agnoli K, Schwager S, Uehlinger S, Vergunst A, Viteri DF, et al. (2012) Exposing the third chromosome of Burkholderia cepacia complex strains as a virulence plasmid. Mol Microbiol 83: 362–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Pessi G, Ahrens CH, Rehrauer H, Lindemann A, Hauser F, et al. (2007) Genome-wide transcript analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids in soybean root nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20: 1353–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yoder-Himes DR, Chain PS, Zhu Y, Wurtzel O, Rubin EM, et al. (2009) Mapping the Burkholderia cenocepacia niche response via high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 3976–3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Delmotte N, Ahrens CH, Knief C, Qeli E, Koch M, et al. (2010) An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean root nodules. Proteomics 10: 1391–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chambers MC, Maclean B, Burke R, Amodei D, Ruderman DL, et al. (2012) A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 30: 918–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Elias JE, Gygi SP (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4: 207–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Qeli E, Ahrens CH (2010) PeptideClassifier for protein inference and targeted quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 28: 647–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Schrimpf SP, Weiss M, Reiter L, Ahrens CH, Jovanovic M, et al. (2009) Comparative functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster proteomes. PLoS Biol 7: e48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Stachel SE, An G, Flores C, Nester EW (1985) A Tn3 lacZ transposon for the random generation of beta-galactosidase gene fusions: application to the analysis of gene expression in Agrobacterium . EMBO J 4: 891–898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Decreased siderophore production in micro-oxic conditions. Siderophore production of B. cenocepacia H111 grown under aerobic (black bar) and micro-oxic (grey bar) conditions was measured on CAS plates. The measured halo diameter corresponds to siderophore activity. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Validation of four micro-oxic induced genes by lacZ fusions. The activity of BCAL2780 (thioredoxin domain containing protein), BCAM1259 (sigma factor), wcaJ (CCE50896, sugar transferase in cepacian cluster II), bclA (lectin) and cepI promoter fusion was determined in the wild type grown in aerobic (black bar) and micro-oxic (grey bar) conditions. Whiskers indicate SD, n = 3.

(TIF)

Figure S3

Proteins identified by the exclusion list approach add 272 preferentially low abundant proteins. The exclusion list approach was successful in adding preferentially lower abundant proteins (red curve) on top of those identified over all discovery runs (blue curve) and allowed us to dig deeper into the proteome. For calculation of the relative protein abundance, see Methods.

(TIF)

Table S1

Shotgun proteomics and RNA-Seq data for all B. cenocepacia H111 genes/proteins grown in micro-oxic (M) conditions and aerobic (A) conditions.

(XLSX)

Table S2

List of 55 B. cenocepacia H111 and J2315 genes that are commonly induced by low oxygen (M) (DESeq analysis, p-value<0.2 for H111, fold change >2 for J2315). The expression in aerobic cells was taken as baseline (A).

(XLSX)

Table S3

Q-PCR results for selected genes.

(XLSX)

Table S4

Bacterial strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES