Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Sep 2;8(9):e73730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073730

Dynamics of Forest Malaria Transmission in Balaghat District, Madhya Pradesh, India

Neeru Singh 1,*, Sunil K Chand 2, Praveen K Bharti 1, Mrigendra P Singh 2, Gyan Chand 1, Ashok K Mishra 2, Man M Shukla 2, Man M Mahulia 3, Ravendra K Sharma 1
Editor: Bruce Russell4
PMCID: PMC3759428  PMID: 24023900

Abstract

Background

An epidemiological and entomological study was carried out in Balaghat district, Madhya Pradesh, India to understand the dynamics of forest malaria transmission in a difficult and hard to reach area where indoor residual spray and insecticide treated nets were used for vector control.

Methods

This community based cross-sectional study was undertaken from January 2010 to December 2012 in Baihar and Birsa Community Health Centres of district Balaghat for screening malaria cases. Entomological surveillance included indoor resting collections, pyrethrum spray catches and light trap catches. Anophelines were assayed by ELISA for detection of Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein.

Findings

Plasmodium falciparum infection accounted for >80% of all infections. P. vivax 16.5%, P. malariae 0.75% and remaining were mixed infections of P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae. More than, 30% infections were found in infants under 6 months of age. Overall, an increasing trend in malaria positivity was observed from 2010 to 2012 (chi-square for trend  =  663.55; P<0.0001). Twenty five Anopheles culicifacies (sibling species C, D and E) were positive for circumsporozoite protein of P. falciparum (44%) and P. vivax (56%). Additionally, 2 An. fluviatilis, were found positive for P. falciparum and 1 for P. vivax (sibling species S and T). An. fluviatilis sibling species T was found as vector in forest villages for the first time in India.

Conclusion

These results showed that the study villages are experiencing almost perennial malaria transmission inspite of indoor residual spray and insecticide treated nets. Therefore, there is a need for new indoor residual insecticides which has longer residual life or complete coverage of population with long lasting insecticide treated nets or both indoor residual spray and long lasting bed nets for effective vector control. There is a need to undertake a well designed case control study to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions.

Introduction

Malaria is a global issue and India contributes substantially to global malaria incidence [1]. Tremendous progress has been made in the last decade in reducing malaria related morbidity and mortality in some countries partly because of increase in funding and partly because of new tools for malaria control such as long lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs), rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) [2].

Factors influencing malaria in India are highly diverse and vary greatly from the epidemiological setting of any other country. The presence of various malarial parasites and vector species, climatic diversity favoring growth and proliferation of the parasite and vector as well as a highly susceptible human population have resulted in high malaria transmission in forested areas of central India (Madhya Pradesh). Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with synthetic pyrethroid and distribution of ACT were in use since 2008. Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) were introduced in this state since 2010. Despite these new tools, a very large number of malaria cases with high spleen rate were reported from district Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh [3], [4]. Understanding the multifaceted determinants of malaria transmission is important as many factors play a role in malaria transmission. A major challenge is the lack of knowledge about vectors, their seasonal abundance, infection rates and role in malaria transmission. Further, little information is available about the local patterns of malaria infection, the annual and seasonal changes in the prevalence with each Plasmodium species and the effect of antimalarial measures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand the dynamics of forest malaria transmission by conducting an epidemiological and entomological study in a difficult and hard to reach area where IRS, ITNs, RDTs and ACT were used for malaria control.

Materials and Methods

Study area and population

Balaghat district is a region of deep valleys, hills and hillocks with thick dense forest (longitude 80°15'E latitude 21°84'N, population 1756409). There are several perennial streams and their tributaries which provide numerous permanent breeding sites for mosquitoes. The villages are located near streams and most of the villages are unapproachable during rains (July - September).

This study was undertaken in 18 villages of Birsa (Population 11536) and 12 villages of Baihar (Population 6218) community health centres (CHCs) which are almost approachable throughout the year and on the border of Rajnandgaon and Kawardha districts of Chhattisgarh state (Figure 1). These villages are about 50–85 km from the state highway and are prone to frequent violence and disturbance [5]. The inhabitants of these villages are a particularly vulnerable tribal group called "Baigas" who generally have less access to education, skilled work and wealth creation opportunities. Overall literacy was 32% and among females literacy rate was only 20% [6]. The houses are made of woods and mud without ventilation and electricity. The local economy is mainly forest based, and agriculture is monsoon dependent. Most of the men and women work as labourers in forest nurseries, road construction and other casual jobs. These people spent most of their time outside the dwellings and sleep on the floor of the verandah (walled on 3 sides and open on one side) or outdoors during hot and humid months. Often domestic animals are sheltered in the house. The seasons are defined as spring (February - March), summer (April - June), monsoon (July - September), post monsoon (October - November) and winter (December - January). Vector control measures in this area included mainly two rounds of indoor residual spraying (IRS) of dwelling with a synthetic pyrethroid (alphacypermethrin). In July – August 2010 insecticide treated bed nets (ITNs) were also given for the first time in these villages (2 per family). The study area is under Enhanced Malaria Control Project with World Bank assistance.

Figure 1. Map of India showing states of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh; District Balaghat and study villages in Baihar and Birsa community health centre.

Figure 1

Also showing bordering districts Kawardha and Rajnandgaon of Chhattisgarh state.

Before undertaking this investigation, data from previous years of the district were obtained from District Malaria Officer (DMO), Balaghat along with details of insecticide used for spray, population covered, types of antimalarial used and their numbers and RDTs used etc (Table 1, 2). The sample size was calculated on the basis of surveillance data available from Birsa and Baihar CHCs as per records of DMO, Balaghat. The average SPR for last three years (2007-09) for Birsa and Baihar CHCs was 1.61%. Thus assuming average SPR as 1.61% for study area and a relative precision of 30% (i.e. estimated SPR will vary between 1.27–2.09%), and level of confidence as 95%, the minimum required sample size was 2609 for blood smear collection.

Table 1. Indoor residual insecticide spray (IRS) of CHC Birsa and Baihar, District Balaghat.* .

Year No of villages Population (%) Coverage Insecticide consumption (kg)
House Room DDT (50%) Alpha cypermethrin (5%) Lambda cyhalothrin (10%)
2007 108 80556 95.4 89.1 5583 1530 -
2008 103 96004 95.2 87.2 - 3340 -
2009 50 39272 97.2 90.5 - 1406 -
2010 182 177439 96.8 89.2 - - 3300
2011 64 46547 92.0 81.0 - 1800 70
2012 224 197399 95.5 85.2 - 6970 -
*

Source: District Malaria Officer, Balaghat.

Table 2. Drug/diagnostic consumption of District Balaghat.* .

Year Cloroquine (CQ) Suphadoxine pyrimethamine (SP) Primaquine Rapid diagnostic kits (Pf) Artesunate + Suphadoxine pyrimethamine (ACT) Blister combipack (Chloroquine + Primaquine)
7.5 mg 2.5 mg
2007 862973 700 254982 74715 61160 0 169696
2008 1087367 3600 288364 180418 38303 13350 127386
2009 1187172 10725 380054 311874 23757 9150 59505
2010 1390842 24550 312050 269827 28275 100000 6110
2011 1361221 4225 127098 30393 18650 11596 0
2012 1180493 0 14711 0 142771 3538 0
*

Source: District Malaria Officer, Balaghat.

Epidemiological surveillance

Monthly cross sectional fever surveys were carried out door-to-door in study villages from January 2010 to December 2012. Finger-pricked blood smears were collected from all fever cases and cases with 14 days history of fever as per the guidelines of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP). The blood smears thus collected were stained with the JSB stain [7]. The microscopist examined 100 fields in thick smears under 1000x magnification before declaring it negative. For quality control 100% of positive smears and 10% of negative smears were re-examined by second expert who was unaware of previous results.

Spleen examination was done in children between 2–9 years with or without fever by Hackett’s method [8]. All parasite positive P. falciparum cases were given ACT [Artesunate Combination Therapy (Artesunate + Sulfadoxine Pyrimethamine)] and Primaquine (PQ) and all P. vivax cases were given Chloroquine (CQ) and PQ as per NVBDCP guidelines [9]. Infants and pregnant women were not given PQ.

Therapeutic efficacy studies

Overall 105 patients (aged 1–59 years) were enrolled with ACT orally over a three-day period. Clinical observations were recorded daily for the first eight days (0–7 days) and during follow- up following standard protocol [10]. Blood smears were prepared from each patient on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days and examined by light microscopy to monitor the parasitological response. Finger prick blood samples were also collected on filter paper for molecular study. The therapeutic efficacy outcome was determined for 77 patients and 28 patients did not complete the study.

Entomological surveillance

Indoor resting Anopheles mosquitoes per man hour (MHD) were sampled once in a month in the early morning (0600 hrs) for 15 minutes each by a team of two insect collectors with flashlights and mouth aspirators in four villages (two from each CHC) as per standard techniques [11]. Pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) were made once in a month from human dwellings (HD) randomly selected other than those selected for indoor resting collection from two villages (one village from each CHC) between 0600 hour to 0930 hour. Light trap catches (LT) indoor-outdoor were also made once in a month in two villages (one from each CHC) other than those selected for MHD and PSC as described earlier [12]. Human bait catches were not performed owing to ethical reasons.

Insecticide susceptibility tests were carried out on field collected An. culicifacies using DDT (4%), malathion (5%) and deltamethrine (0.05%) test papers following standard techniques [13]. The efficacy of alphacypermethrin was determined by cone bioassay method. Anophelines were assayed by ELISA for detection of Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein (CSP). The ELISA protocol described by Wirtz et al. (1987) [14] was followed to detect CSP of P. falciparum and P. vivax. PCR and D3 domain of 28S rDNA gene sequencing was used to identify all specimens of the An. culicifacies and An. fluviatilis species complex as described earlier [15].

Data analysis

The data were double key-entered in MS Access 2003 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) based data entry screen. Age was recoded in categorical variable (up to 1, >1–4, >4–8, >8–14 and above 14 years of age) before analysis. 2×2 contingency table analyses were used to describe the differences in case prevalence by age groups. Data analysis was done using SPSS 17 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

The slide positivity rate (SPR) is the proportion of examined thick films found parasite positive and the related slide falciparum rate (SFR) and slide vivax rate (SVR) were calculated. Gametocyte carriers were recorded only for P. falciparum.

Ethics

Informed written consent was obtained from each adult and from guardian of the children enrolled as per ethical guidelines of Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India. Purpose, potential risk and benefits of the study has been communicated in local language (‘Hindi’) and consent was documented, even for those who were unable to read and write by taking thumb impression in the presence of a witness specifically from the same community. Generally school teachers, forest guards and other influential members of their community are very helpful in explaining benefit of the study and obtaining consent. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Regional Medical Research Centre for Tribals, Jabalpur, India (IRB00006471).

Results

Epidemiological studies

Of the total 5683 males and 5939 females screened for malaria, 1881 males (33%) and 1868 females (31.5%) were positive for malaria (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.0–1.16). Figure 2 showed sex wise malaria positivity rates from 2010 to 2012. Age-specific and species specific data on malaria are shown in Table 3. The malaria positivity rates varied over the years and P. malariae was found only in 2012.

Figure 2. Sex wise malaria prevalence in study villages of Balaghat district (2010 – 2012).

Figure 2

Table 3. Year/age group wise malaria prevalence in rapid fever survey in CHC Birsa and Baihar, District Balaghat (2010 – 2012).

Year Age group (years) +ve/BSE Pf Pv Pm Mixed (Pf+Pv) Mixed (Pm+Pf/Pv) SPR SFR SVR Pf g rate OR (malaria) 95% CI
2010 ≤1 49/189 30 19 0 0 0 25.9 15.9 10.1 26.7 2.9 2.0–4.1***
>1–4 217/708 167 49 0 1 0 30.6 23.7 6.9 15.5 3.6 2.9–4.5***
>4–8 296/1015 248 48 0 0 0 29.2 24.4 4.7 8.1 3.4 2.8–4.1***
>8–14 267/1135 240 27 0 0 0 23.5 21.1 2.4 5.8 2.5 2.1–3.1***
>14 219/2011 200 19 0 0 0 10.9 9.9 0.9 10.0 1.0 Reference
Total 1048/5058 885 162 0 1 0 20.7 17.5 3.2 9.9
2011 ≤1 59/222 43 16 0 0 0 26.6 19.4 7.2 9.3 1.2 0.9–1.7***
>1–4 160/331 121 35 0 4 0 48.3 37.8 10.6 16.8 3.1 2.4–4.0***
>4–8 259/519 236 21 0 2 0 49.9 45.9 4.0 14.3 3.3 2.6–4.1***
>8–14 221/672 202 19 0 0 0 32.9 30.1 2.8 7.4 1.6 1.3–2.0***
>14 242/1037 231 11 0 0 0 23.3 22.3 1.1 6.1 1.0 Reference
Total 941/2781 833 102 0 6 0 33.8 30.2 3.7 10.5
2012 ≤1 70/142 41 23 0 5 1 49.3 32.4 16.2 23.9 2.7 1.9–3.9***
>1–4 291/451 185 70 4 24 8 64.5 46.3 15.5 28.2 5.1 3.9–6.6***
>4–8 501/861 362 91 16 25 7 58.2 44.9 10.6 25.6 3.9 3.1–4.8***
>8–14 680/1504 543 111 7 11 8 45.2 36.8 7.4 14.8 2.3 1.9–2.8***
>14 218/825 190 25 2 1 0 26.4 23.2 3.0 10.5 1.0 Reference
Total 1760/3783 1321 320 29 66 24 46.5 36.7 8.5 19.5
***

P<0.001; +ve: Malaria parasitaemic cases; BSE: Blood slide examined; Pf: Plasmodium falciparum; Pv: Plasmodium vivax; Pm: Plasmodium malariae; SPR: Slide positivity rate; SFR: Slide falciparum rate; SVR: Slide vivax rate; Pfg rate: Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes rate; OR (malaria): Odds ratio for malaria positive; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

The SPR was lowest in adults (aged >14 yrs) when compared with other age groups (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.8–3.4) (P< 0.0001). The SVR was highest in infants < = 1 year) (OR 8.1; 95% CI 5.5–12.0) when compared with adults (P<0.001) (Table 3). Further analysis revealed that out of 178 infants positive for malaria, 58 were less than 6 months (33%) of which 40 were positive for P. falciparum and 18 for P. vivax. However, SFR was highest in relatively older children > 4–8 years (OR 3.0; 95% CI 2.7–3.4) compared with adults (P<0.001). P. falciparum proportion was higher in all age groups as compared to P. vivax (P<0.001). The mean gametocyte rate was 14.4% and monitoring of gametocyte prevalence revealed that young children less than 5 years have significantly more gametocytes as compared to relatively older children (>5 years and above) (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4–2.3).

Further analysis of the distribution of malaria cases by season revealed that SFR was highest in post monsoon season 40.3% (OR, 2.9; 95% CI 2.6–3.3) and lowest in summer 18.7% (Table 4). The gametocyte rate was highest in spring (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.6–5.8) and lowest in monsoon while SVR was highest in summer (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.8) and lowest in post monsoon. Examination of blood smears in children with enlarged spleen revealed that highest falciparum prevalence was observed in post monsoon months as compared to spring (OR 4.1; 95% CI 3.0–5.5) while P. vivax prevalence was highest in summer (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.9–5.2). Spleen rate was 48.5% in 2010 which increased to 58.3% in 2012 (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3–1.7). The average spleen rate in children was 43.8% (2269/5182) and the average enlarged spleen was 1.99 (95% CI 1.94–2.04). Year wise analysis revealed (Table 3) that SPR increased from 20.7% in 2010 to 33.8% in 2011 (i.e. 13.1 point increase) and further 46.6% in 2012 (an increase of 12.8 points between 2011-12). Similarly SFR increased from 17.5 in 2010 to 30.2 (12.7 point increase) and further 36.7 in 2012 (an increase of 6.5 points between 2011-12). However, the proportion of P. falciparum declined by 5.7% in 2012 when compared with 2010.

Table 4. Year/season wise malaria prevalence in CHC Birsa and Baihar, District Balaghat (2010 – 2012).

Year Seasons +ve/BSE Pf Pv Pm Mixed (Pf+Pv) Mixed (Pm+Pf/Pv) SPR SFR SVR Pf g rate OR (malaria) 95% CI
2010 Spring (Feb-Mar) 102/1051 86 16 0 0 0 9.7 8.2 1.5 14.0 1 Reference
Summer (Apr-Jun) 242/1359 177 65 0 0 0 17.8 13.0 4.8 11.3 2.0 1.6–2.6***
Monsoon (Jul-Sep) 210/705 190 20 0 0 0 29.8 27.0 2.8 7.4 3.9 3.0–5.2***
Post monsoon (Oct-Nov) 178/832 155 23 0 0 0 21.4 18.6 2.8 8.4 2.5 1.9–3.3***
Winter (Dec-Jan) 316/1111 277 38 0 1 0 28.4 25.0 3.4 10.4 3.7 2.9–4.7***
Total 1048/5058 885 162 0 1 0 20.7 17.5 3.2 9.9
2011 Spring (Feb-Mar) 78/501 63 15 0 0 0 15.6 12.6 3.0 6.3 1 Reference
Summer (Apr-Jun) 182/811 156 26 0 0 0 22.4 19.2 3.2 1.9 1.6 1.2–2.1**
Monsoon (Jul-Sep) 56/251 48 7 0 1 0 22.3 19.5 2.8 2.0 1.6 1.1–2.3*
Post monsoon (Oct-Nov) 473/698 432 38 0 3 0 67.8 62.3 5.4 9.2 11.4 8.1–16.0***
Winter (Dec-Jan) 152/520 134 16 0 2 0 29.2 26.2 3.1 29.4 2.2 1.6–3.1***
Total 941/2781 833 102 0 6 0 33.8 30.2 3.7 10.5
2012 Spring (Feb-Mar) 521/993 325 103 23 46 24 52.5 37.4 10.4 29.1 1 Reference
Summer (Apr-Jun) 279/663 188 76 5 10 0 42.1 29.9 11.5 15.7 0.7 0.5–0.8***
Monsoon (Jul-Sep) 289/752 226 63 0 0 0 38.4 30.1 8.4 8.8 0.6 0.5–0.7***
Post monsoon (Oct-Nov) 386/799 345 38 0 3 0 48.3 43.6 4.8 18.7 0.8 0.7–1.0*
Winter (Dec-Jan) 285/576 237 40 1 7 0 49.5 42.4 6.9 19.3 0.9 0.7–1.1**
Total 1760/3783 1321 320 29 66 24 46.5 36.7 8.5 19.5
*

P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; +ve: Malaria parasitaemic cases; BSE: Blood slide examined; Pf: Plasmodium falciparum; Pv: Plasmodium vivax; Pm: Plasmodium malariae; SPR: Slide positivity rate; SFR: Slide falciparum rate; SVR: Slide vivax rate; Pfg rate: Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes rate; OR (malaria): Odds ratio for malaria positive; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Over all therapeutic efficacy study showed 100% adequate clinical and parasitological response and follow up of patients up to 28 days did not show clinical symptoms and malaria parasites.

Entomological studies

The anopheline fauna of the villages consisted of 9 species, of which An. culicifacies Giles, An. subpictus Grassi, An. fluviatilis James, An. annularsis Van Der Wulp were the most abundant species in indoor resting collection (MHD) (Figure 3). An. vagus Donitz, An. pallidus Theobald, An. barbirostris Van Der Wulp. An. nigerrimus Giles and An. jeyporiensis Froud were collected in very small numbers. The number of anopheline mosquitoes collected throughout the year did not show a consistent pattern. The 301 man hour of efforts revealed that An. subpictus was the most predominant species (53.5%) with a peak in monsoon months. The relative abundance of An. culicifacies was high throughout the year (39%) with a peak in post monsoon season (October - November). An. fluviatilis was collected mainly in winter season (December - January) and was almost absent during the dry hot months of April to June. The trend of anopheline prevalence was more or less similar in MHD (Figure 3) and PSC (Figure 4) except in case of An. annularsis which was found relatively more in MHD collections in post monsoon and winter seasons compared to respective PSC catches in these seasons. Three more species were found in LT in very small numbers. These are An. splendidus Koidzumi, An. theobaldi Giles and An. tessellates Theobald. Comparison of season wise catches of light trap revealed that significantly more An. culicifacies were found in post monsoon and winter seasons, An. fluviatilis in monsoon season, An. subpictus in monsoon, post monsoon and winter and An. annularsis were found during monsoon in outdoor catches as compared to indoor (Figure 5).

Figure 3. Season wise average per man hour density (indoor resting collection) in villages of Balaghat (2010-2012).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Season wise pyrethrum spray catches in human dwelling in Balaghat (2010-2012).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Season wise light trap catches (indoor and outdoor trap collection) in villages of Balaghat (2010-2012).

Figure 5

Table 5 showed that out of 3312 An. culicifacies assayed, 25 were positive for CSP of which, 14 were reactive for two polymorphs of P. vivax (7 VK 210 and 7 VK 247) and remaining for P. falciparum. The positive An. culicifacies were found during most part of the year except in January, February and March. They were caught from HD, Cattle shed (CS), PSC and LT (indoor/outdoor) and represented sibling species C, D and E (Figure 6a) (GenBank database accession numbers KC494261, KC494262 & KC494264). However, only one An. culicifacies (species C) was found positive from outdoor collection (LT). Additionally out of 67 An. fluviatilis, two were reactive for P. falciparum and represented sibling species T (Figure 6b) (GenBank database accession numbers KC345546, KC345547). Only one An. fluviatilis (sibling species S) was positive for CSP of P. vivax (VK 247).

Table 5. Vector incrimination of Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles fluviatilis by ELISA from different sites in District Balaghat.

Type of collection Site Tested +ve Pv Pf
An. cul. An. fluv. An. cul. An. fluv. An. cul. An. fluv. An. cul. An. fluv.
VK210 VK247 VK210 VK247
Light Trap Indoor 30 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Outdoor 59 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
MHD HD 626 8 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0
CS 1440 45 12 0 2 3 0 0 7 0
PSC HD 1157 13 8 3 1 4 0 1 3 2
Total 3312 67 25 3 7 7 0 1 11 2

+ve: Positive; Pv: Plasmodium vivax; Pf: Plasmodium falciparum; An. cul.: Anopheles culicifacies; An. fluv.: Anopheles fluviatilis; HD: Human dwelling; CS: Cattle shed; MHD: Man hour density; PSC: Pyrethrum spray catches.

Figure 6. (a) Nucleotide alignment of Anopheles culicifacies species complex (GenBank database accession numbers KC494261, KC494262 & KC494264); (b) Nucleotide alignment of Anopheles fluviatilis species complex (GenBank database accession numbers KC 345546 & KC345547).

Figure 6

Monitoring of insecticide susceptibility tests with An. culicifacies revealed that species is resistant to DDT and partially susceptible to malathion, lambda cyhalothrin and deltamethrin. The corrected percent mortality to DDT, malathion, deltamethrin and lambda cyhalothrin was 7, 82, 95 and 97% respectively. Cone bioassay test with alphacypermethrin showed 48% mortality on day 1 and 7.5% mortality on day 30.

Discussion

The renewed effort to control malaria is founded on the recent preventive strategies and treatment options. In India the key interventions are IRS/ITNs/LLINs, RDTs and ACT. In the study area transmission occurs during most part of the year with a peak during post monsoon season. Overall, an increasing trend in malaria positivity was observed from 2010 to 2012 (chi-square for trend  =  663.55; P<0.0001). In this study >50% of the cases were reported in children less than 8 year and 31% cases were reported in older children between 8 to 14 years while only 18% cases above 14 years of age. The number of malaria cases and age group indicated that the risk for the age group under 8 years was 3.4 times greater than in adults suggesting a considerable degree of immunity in the adults.

More than 30% infants found infected with P. falciparum or P. vivax were less than 6 months of age. A review of age pattern of malaria revealed that as transmission increased, there was a shift of malaria towards younger age groups, regardless of seasonality [16], [17]. Overall, the most prevalent parasite was P. falciparum (80%) followed by P. vivax. It is interesting to point out that both P. vivax polymorphs, Pv 210 and Pv 247 were present almost equally while in North East India, VK 247 was predominant polymorphs [18]. Future studies are required to investigate if the same trend continues or both the polymorphs of P. vivax overlap [19]. P. malariae infections were recorded only in 2012 [4]. P. malariae is sustained at low infection rates among the sparse and mobile human population [20]. The high prevalence of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria throughout the year with high sporozoite rate estimated for P. falciparum and P. vivax indicates that the vector control measures were inadequate and not effective in reducing adult vector density. Moreover, the environmental and climatological situations permit the continual breeding of vectors in permanent breeding sites. The sporozoite rate of An. culicifacies found in this study explains that An. culicifacies plays a major role in malaria transmission and An. fluviatilis played a role in enhancing P. falciparum transmission period along with An. culicifacies well beyond the wetter months. Moreover, for the first time An. fluviatilis sibling species T was found playing a major role in malaria transmission in forest villages along with species S in India.

The high infection rates with P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae and mixed infection of P. vivax, P. falciparum and P. malariae suggest that vectors had a long life expectancy. Further, the patterns of infections are also determined by the occurrence and the ability of the vector species to be infected by different parasite species simultaneously [21]. IRS seemed to be ineffective in this area as there is a rapid decline of IRS insecticidal effectiveness within a month after spraying with alphacypermethrin. Moreover, IRS effectiveness depends on a high level of coverage. However, records revealed that in this area the amount of insecticide used for IRS varies from year to year. Actually the spray is carried out on the basis of epidemiological data collected from routine health facility surveillance record of the district malaria office. Data on number of malaria positives were based on village wise data pooled overall 12 months a year from all the PHCs of the district. Often this data is underestimated which resulted in limited spraying by the programme. Spraying also depends largely on the availability of insecticides in stock. Furthermore, An. culicifacies was also found positive in outdoor catches. The outdoor infectivity of An. culicifacies is of significance from a malaria control stand point, because the vector may avoid contact even with an effective insecticide sprayed inside the houses. Further research is required about the extra domiciliary transmission as the villagers frequently spent the night in the open, presumably providing a source of infection to the anophelines prevalent outdoors. During the survey, people also told that these bednets were never re-impregnated. Therefore, providing LLINs in such communities can remedy the short coming associated with ITNs. The World Health Organization also recommended the use of LLINs as these nets are designed to maintain their biological efficacy against vector mosquitoes for three years, obviating the need for regular insecticide treatment [22]. However, there are some weaknesses in the study. Because of the programmatic nature of intervention neither the spray campaigns are implemented rigorously and with high levels of house hold coverage nor a complete coverage of population with ITNs. Moreover, we could not check whether people are using bednet properly as about 85% nets were torn after 18 months. Entomological indices lacked human bait catches as the area is not safe. Thus entomological inoculation rate (EIR) could not be calculated.

Conclusions

Tremendous progress has been made in some countries in reducing malaria related morbidity and many countries are striving for elimination of malaria [23], [24]. Amidst this process a major challenge is in forested areas which are also distributed and not approachable at least 2–3 months during raining season.

ITNs and IRS which are so effective in other parts of world [25] were not found effective in this area perhaps because of the outdoor life and forest based economy of the tribals [26]. Thus, there is a need to test the feasibility and effectiveness of other methods of control, for example - complete coverage of population with LLINs or with a new indoor residual insecticides which has longer residual life or both LLINs and IRS for effective vector control. Finally a well designed case control study may be taken up to evaluate the efficacy of these malaria interventions systematically.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and sincerely appreciate the support from National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) and Department of Health and Family Walfare, Government of Madhya Pradesh. We also like to acknowledge the support of District Malaria Officer, Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh. Thanks are also extended to the study participants who consented to participate in this study.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hay SI, Okiro EA, Gething PW, Patil AP, Tatem AJ, et al. (2010) Estimating the global clinical burden of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2007. PLoS Med 7: e1000290. PMID: 20563310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Greenwood B (2009) Can malaria be eliminated? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg103 Suppl 1: S2-5. PMID:19062058. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Shukla M, Singh N, Singh MP (2011) Spleen rates and infant parasite rates as surveillance tool for malaria control in remote hard to reach areas of central India. Malar J 10: : 381. PMID: 22185197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bharti PK, Chand SK, Singh MP, Mishra S, Shukla MM, et al. (2013) Emergence of a new focus of Plasmodium malariae in forest villages of district Balaghat, Central India: implications for the diagnosis of malaria and its control. Trop Med Int Health 18: : 12–17. PMID: 23107370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. List of 83 Left Wing Extremist affected districts included under SRE Scheme. Available: http://mha.nic.in/pdfs/LWE-aftdDist-131210.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 21.
  • 6.Census of India 2001. Madhay Pradesh. Data highlights: The schedule tribes. Available: http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/dh_st_madhya_pradesh.pdf. Accessed 2013 Apr 22.
  • 7.Bhattacharji LM, Singh J, Sen Gupta GP (1946) A simple methylene blue-eosin substitute for Leishman and Giemsa stains. Ind Med Gaz 81: 400. PMID: 20281863 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Christophers SR, Sinton JA, Covell G (1958) How to do a malaria survey? Health Bulletin No, 14, Delhi: Government of India Press.
  • 9.NVBDCP (2010) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of malaria in India. Available: http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/Technical-Guidelines-Malaria-2010.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 21.
  • 10.World Health Organization (2009) Methods for surveillance of Antimalarial drug efficiency. WHO Geneva 2009. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597531_eng.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 21.
  • 11.World Health Organization (1975) Manual on practical entomology in Malaria. Part. II -WHO Geneva. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/offset/WHO_OFFSET_13_%28part2%29.pdf. Accessed 2013 Aug 7.
  • 12.Singh N, Shukla MM, Chand G, Bharti PK, Singh MP, et al. (2011) Epidemic of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Central India, an area where chloroquine has been replaced by artemisinin-based combination therapy. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 105: : 133-139. PMID: 21292291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World Health Organization (1998) Report of the WHO informal consultation. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticides on treated surfaces. WHO Geneva. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_CDS_CPC_MAL_98.12.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 21.
  • 14.Wirtz RA, Burkot TR, Graves PM, Andre RG (1987) Field evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax sporozoites in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea. J Med Entomol 24: : 433–437. PMID: 3305949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tripathy A, Samanta L, Das S, Parida SK, Marai N, et al. (2010) Distribution of sibling species of Anopheles culicifacies s.l. and Anopheles fluviatilis s.l. and their vectorial capacity in eight different malaria endemic districts of Orissa, India. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 105: : 981–987. PMID: 21225194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Carneiro I, Roca-Feltrer A, Griffin JT, Smith L, Tanner M, et al. (2010) Age-patterns of malaria vary with severity, transmission intensity and seasonality in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and pooled analysis. PLoS One 5: e8988 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008988. PMID: 20126547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. D'Alessandro U, Ubben D, Hamed K, Ceesay SJ, Okebe J, et al. (2012) Malaria in infants aged less than six months-is it an area of unmet medical need? Malar J 11: 400 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-400. PMID: 23198986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prakash A, Bhattacharyya DR, Mohapatra PK, Mahanta J (2005) Potential of Anopheles philippinensisnivipes complex mosquitoes as malaria vector in north-east India. J Environ Biol 26: : 719–723. PMID: 16459563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Magris M, Rubio-Palis Y, Menares C, Villegas L (2007) Vector bionomics and malaria transmission in the Upper Orinoco River, Southern Venezuela. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: : 303–311. PMID: 17568935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mohapatra PK, Prakash A, Bhattacharyya DR, Goswami BK, Ahmed A, et al. (2008) Detection & molecular confirmation of a focus of Plasmodium malariae in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian J Med Res 128: : 52–56. PMID: 18820359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mayxay M, Pukrittayakamee S, Newton PN, White NJ (2004) Mixed-species malaria infections in humans. Trends Parasitol 20: : 233–240. PMID: 15105024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.World Health Organization (2005) Global strategic plan. Roll back malaria 2005–2015. Geneva: Roll Back malaria partnership. Available: http://www.rollbackmalaria.org/forumV/docs/gsp_en.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jul 12.
  • 23.Abeyasinghe RR, Galappaththy GN, Smith Gueye C, Kahn JG, Feachem RG (2012) Malaria Control and Elimination in Sri Lanka: Documenting Progress and Success Factors in a Conflict Setting. PLoS One 7: e43162. PMID: 22952642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.World Health Organization (2011) World Malaria Report 2011. WHO Geneva 2011. Available: http://www.who.int/malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/9789241564403_eng.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 21.
  • 25.Okumu FO, Moore SJ (2011) Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets for malaria control in Africa: a review of possible outcomes and an outline of suggestions for the future. Malar J 10: : 208. PMID: 21798053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singh Neeru, Singh OP, Sharma VP (1996) Dynamics of malaria transmission in forested and deforested region of Mandla district, Central India, Madhya Pradesh. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc. 12: : 225–234. PMID: 8827597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES