Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2013 Sep 7;19(33):5508–5512. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5508

Antibiotics resistance rate of Helicobacter pylori in Bhutan

Ratha-korn Vilaichone 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Yoshio Yamaoka 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Seiji Shiota 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Thawee Ratanachu-ek 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Lotay Tshering 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Tomohisa Uchida 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Toshio Fujioka 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Varocha Mahachai 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC3761104  PMID: 24023494

Abstract

AIM: To survey the antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) strains isolated from Bhutanese population.

METHODS: We isolated 111 H. pylori strains from the gastric mucosa of H. pylori-infected patients in Bhutan in 2010. The Epsilometer test was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amoxicillin (AMX), clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MNZ), levofloxacin (LVX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and tetracycline (TET).

RESULTS: Nineteen of the isolated H. pylori strains were susceptible to all antibiotics tested. The isolated strains showed the highest rate of antibiotic resistance to MNZ (92/111, 82.9%). Among the 92 MNZ-resistant strains, 74 strains (80.4%) showed high-level resistance (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL). Three strains were resistance to LVX (2.7%). These strains were also resistance to CIP. None of the strains showed resistance to CLR, AMX and TET.

CONCLUSION: CLR-based triple therapy is a more effective treatment approach over MNZ-based triple therapy for H. pylori infection in Bhutan.

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, Drug resistance, Bhutan


Core tip: In Bhutan, 82.9% of Helicobacter pylori isolates showed metronidazole resistance. Of these, 80.4% showed high-level resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥ 256 μg/mL). Only 2.7% strains showed levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin resistance. Intriguingly, none of them were resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline.

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a spiral, Gram-negative bacterium that infects more than half of the world’s population and is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer diseases, gastric cancer (GC), and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma[1,2]. Eradication of H. pylori infection not only improves the healing of peptic ulcers, but it also prevents its recurrence and reduces the risk of developing GC[3-7]. Furthermore, other H. pylori-associated disorders such as MALT lymphoma, atrophic gastritis, and intestinal metaplasia have been shown to regress after treatment with antibiotics[8-10].

Triple therapy regimens that include 1 proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and 2 antimicrobial agents such as amoxicillin (AMX), clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MNZ), levofloxacin (LVX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and tetracycline (TET) have been widely used to eradicate this bacterium[7,11,12]. Although the success of the treatment depends on several factors such as patient compliance and whether the patient is a smoker, antibiotic resistance is the most common factor causing treatment failure[13-15]. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance is now increasing worldwide and varies by the geographic area; it is generally higher in developing countries than in developed regions[16-18]. In addition, the antibiotic resistance rate often parallels the antibiotic consumption rate in the population[16,19-21].

Bhutan is a small landlocked country in South Asia, located at the eastern end of the Himalayas, and shares its borders in the south, east, and west with the Republic of India and to the north with the People’s Republic of China. In Bhutan, the incidence of GC is reported to be quite high (24.2 deaths/100000 population) compared to the neighboring areas[22]. Effective therapies to eradicate H. pylori can contribute to the decrease of GC incidence in Bhutan. However, information about the prevalence of drug-resistant H. pylori strains in Bhutan, which is essential for designing effective eradication therapies, is lacking.

In this study, we aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori strains isolated from Bhutanese population toward AMX, CLR, MNZ, LVX, CIP, and TET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects and sample collection

H. pylori strains were obtained from the gastric mucosa of H. pylori-infected Bhutanese volunteers who underwent endoscopy at 3 cities within the country (Thimpu, Punaka, and Wangdue) from December 6 to 9, 2010. Biopsy samples from the antrum were endoscopically obtained from each patient and used for culturing H. pylori by using standard methods. Cases of peptic ulcers and GC were identified by endoscopy, and GC was further confirmed by histopathology. Gastritis was defined as H. pylori infection-mediated gastritis in the absence of peptic ulcer or gastric malignancy. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jigme Dorji Wangchuk National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.

Drug sensitivity testing

Epsilometer test (E test) was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of AMX, CLR, MNZ, LVX, CIP, and TET. Mueller Hinton II Agar supplemented with 10% horse blood was used as the culture medium and the culture suspension was used to inoculate the agar plates. The E test strip of the corresponding antibiotic was placed on the plate and incubated for 3-5 d at 37 °C, under microaerophilic conditions. The MIC was defined by the point of intersection of the inhibition ellipse with the E test strip. Strains were considered “resistance” when the MIC values were ≥ 1 μg/mL for AMX, ≥ 1 μg/mL for CLR, ≥ 1 μg/mL for LVX, ≥ 8 μg/mL for MNZ, and ≥ 4 μg/mL for TET[23]. In accordance with previous studies, strains were considered “resistance” to CIP when the MIC values were ≥ 1 μg/mL[24,25].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The univariate association between each group was quantified using the unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher’s exact test, and χ2 test. A two-tailed P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We isolated 111 strains of H. pylori from H. pylori-positive Bhutanese patients; the identity of these strains was microbiologically confirmed. The patient group included 51 men and 60 women, with an average age of 36.8 ± 13.9 years. Seventy strains were isolated from patients with gastritis, 11 from patients with peptic ulcer, and 1 from a patient with GC. Nineteen strains were susceptible to all the antibiotics tested. The greatest proportion of isolated strains was resistance to MNZ (92/111, 82.9%, Table 1). The resistance rate was 84.2% (48/57) in the strains isolated from patients younger than 34 years of age, 82.4% (28/34) in the strains isolated from patients aged 35-49 years, 71.4% (10/14) in the strains isolated from patients aged 50-64 years, and 100% (6/6) in the strains isolated from patients above 65 years of age. There was no relationship between the age of the patient and the rate of resistance of the isolated strain to MNZ (P = 0.45). Gender was not associated with MNZ resistance as well (P = 0.71). All 11 strains of H. pylori from patients with peptic ulcer showed resistance to MNZ; however, it did not statistically differ from the resistance rates of strains isolated from gastritis patients (P = 0.11). The distribution of MIC values for MNZ: among 92 MNZ-resistant strains, 74 strains (80.4%) showed high-level resistance (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL). Three strains (2.7%), from patients with gastritis, were resistant to LVX. These strains were also resistance to CIP. The MIC values for LVX and CIP were 32 and 32 μg/mL, respectively. These 3 strains were also resistance to MNZ. None of the strains showed resistance to CLR, AMX, and TET. Resistance to multiple antibiotics was observed in 3 strains (2.7%), where the bacteria were resistant to MNZ, LVX, and CIP. The strain isolated from the GC patient was susceptible to all the antibiotics tested.

Table 1.

Antibiotic susceptibility of 111 Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in Bhutan n (%)

Total n = 111
Amoxicillin 0 (0.0)
Clarithromycin 0 (0.0)
Metronidazole 92 (82.9)
Levofloxacin 3 (2.7)
Ciprofloxacin 3 (2.7)
Tetracycline 0 (0.0)

DISCUSSION

This is the first study exploring the antibiotic resistance pattern of H. pylori strains isolated from Bhutanese population. In Bhutan, no domestic guidelines are available for the treatment of H. pylori because of insufficient domestic data. At present, the European, Asia-Pacific, and American guidelines on the treatment of H. pylori infection recommend a combination of 1 PPI and 2 antibiotics, AMX plus CLR or MNZ, as the first-line therapy[7,11,12]. Although lack of patient compliance, inadequate length of therapy, or high bacterial burden are conditions that may contribute to loss of efficacy, antimicrobial resistance is regarded as the leading factor responsible for the failure of eradication of infection. This issue is of particular relevance with regard to CLR, where there can be up to 70% loss of antibiotic effectiveness, depending on macrolide susceptibility in vitro[16]. Meta-analysis showed that triple therapy consisting of PPI, AMX, and CLR in CLR-resistant infections decreased the treatment efficacy by 66%[26]. In fact, the Maastricht III guidelines on H. pylori infection management recommend that CLR should not be used when resistance to the antibiotic exceeds 15%-20%[7]. However, surprisingly, none of the strains isolated in Bhutan showed resistance to CLR, suggesting that CLR-based triple therapy can still be used to eradicate H. pylori in Bhutan. However, resistance to CLR is increasing worldwide with the increase in the use of CLR[27-29], and it is imperative to examine the CLR resistance rate in the H. pylori strains in Bhutan.

Resistance to MNZ is extremely high in Bhutan. Recently, the rate of resistance to MNZ has been reported to increase; this can be considered a major factor leading to reduced efficacy of the standard triple therapy in most countries[11]. Most MNZ-resistant strains in this study showed a high MIC value (≥ 256 μg/mL). Regimens including MNZ are not a preferred choice in populations with an MNZ resistance rate of > 40%[19,30]. Therefore, if CLR resistance increases in future, MNZ cannot be used as a substitute for CLR in the first-line regimen in Bhutan.

MNZ is frequently used to treat not only H. pylori infections, but also other infections such as intestinal parasite infections and periodontal and gynecological diseases, which are common in developing countries[16,31]. National Statistics Bureau of Bhutan also showed that infectious diarrhea is one of the major causes of mortality in the country, which suggests that MNZ can be often used for its treatment (http://www.nsb.gov.bt/).

Recently, LVX has been prescribed as a rescue drug to eradicate infection in case of failure of the first-line therapy[32,33]. However, the prevalence of LVX resistance seems to be increasing worldwide and this may reduce the efficacy of treatment with LVX-based regimens[34-39]. Therefore, according to the European, Asia-Pacific, and American guidelines, LVX should be used in salvage therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility testing[7,11,12]. In Bhutan, LVX is rarely used for the treatment of other infectious diseases and LVX resistance was found only in 3 strains. These strains were also resistant to CIP, suggesting cross-resistance among the fluoroquinolone drugs. TET resistance was not noted in any of the strains tested, consistent with the findings of previous studies from other countries[25,40,41]. TET is not often used for the treatment of infectious diseases in Bhutan. Therefore, TET-based or quadruple therapy including TET can be a useful alternative to the first-line regimen, as recommended in the European and Asia-Pacific guidelines[7,11]. Likewise, all strains in this study were susceptible to AMX, which is consistent with previous findings[40,42,43].

However, we should be cautious about implementing the eradication therapy in Bhutan. Despite the success of the H. pylori eradication therapy, the infection does frequently recur in patients in developing countries where there is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection[44]. Such repeat infection is either a recurrence of the original infection or reinfection with a new strain. Environmental factors, including poor living conditions, are related to high rates of H. pylori infection[45,46]. In rural areas of the country, river or pond water can be used as the source of drinking water (information from National Statistics Bureau, http://www.nsb.gov.bt/); furthermore, unsanitary pit latrines are widely used in this country. It is necessary to improve sanitary conditions to decrease the prevalence of H. pylori.

In conclusion, CLR-based triple therapy can still be used to eradicate H. pylori in Bhutan. However, because of high resistance rates, MNZ-based triple therapy is not useful as the first-line therapy. It is necessary to have current and reliable information on the prevalence of antibiotic resistance to H. pylori, in particular, in Bhutan. Careful consideration is required for formulating national therapeutic guidelines for the first-line and second-line therapies for H. pylori infection, considering factors such as disease prevalence, access to health care centers, diagnostic facilities, and the burden of health care costs borne by the government.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Chaithongrat S for their technical assistance.

COMMENTS

Background

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) reduces the risk of developing gastric cancer (GC). Antibiotic resistance is the most common factor causing the failure of the treatment. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance is now increasing worldwide and varies in geographic area. The incidence of GC in Bhutan is reported to be quite high comparing with neighbor area. Therefore, effective eradication therapy can contribute to the decrease of incidence of GC in Bhutan. However, the prevalence of drug resistant H. pylori in Bhutan has not been elucidated.

Research frontiers

Triple therapy regimens including one proton pump inhibitor and two antimicrobial agents such as amoxicillin (AMX), clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MNZ), levofloxacin (LVX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and tetracycline have been widely used to eradicate H. pylori. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance is now increasing worldwide and varies in geographic area. Although the success of the treatment depends on several factors such as smoking and patient compliance, antibiotic resistance is the most common factor causing the failure of the treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the recent drug resistance rates to select the proper eradication regimens.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Although the incidence of GC in Bhutan is quite high comparing with neighbor area, the prevalence of drug resistant H. pylori in Bhutan has not been elucidated. The author’s findings can contribute to the decrease of incidence of GC in Bhutan.

Applications

CLR-based triple therapy can be used to eradicate H. pylori whereas MNZ-based triple therapy is not suitable for H. pylori eradication in Bhutan.

Peer review

The manuscript reports on the pattern of H. pylori resistance to antibiotics in Bhutan. The strains of H. pylori, cultured from antral mucosal biopsies 111 patients, were assessed for susceptibility to GC, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline, using Epsilometer test. The results revealed the highest resistance rate (83%) to MNZ followed by LVX and CIP, both about 2.7%. This manuscript of limited importance, and of interest to those studying the health status of Bhutanese.

Footnotes

Supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health, DK62813 to Yamaoka Y; National Research University Project of Thailand Office of Higher Education Commission to Vilaichone R, Mahachai V; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, No. 22390085, 22659087, 24406015 and 24659200 to Yamaoka Y; The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Institutional Program for Young Researcher Overseas Visits to Fujioka T, Yamaoka Y; The Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology from Japan Science and Technology Agency to Fujioka T, Yamaoka Y

P- Reviewer Slomiany BL S- Editor Gou SX L- Editor A E- Editor Ma S

References

  • 1.Peek RM, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:28–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1175–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hosking SW, Ling TK, Chung SC, Yung MY, Cheng AF, Sung JJ, Li AK. Duodenal ulcer healing by eradication of Helicobacter pylori without anti-acid treatment: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1994;343:508–510. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91460-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shiota S, Yamaoka Y. Management of Helicobacter pylori. F1000 Med Rep. 2010:2. doi: 10.3410/M2-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shiota S, Murakami K, Fujioka T, Yamaoka Y. Population-based strategies for Helicobacter pylori-associated disease management: a Japanese perspective. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4:149–156. doi: 10.1586/egh.10.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takenaka R, Okada H, Kato J, Makidono C, Hori S, Kawahara Y, Miyoshi M, Yumoto E, Imagawa A, Toyokawa T, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication reduced the incidence of gastric cancer, especially of the intestinal type. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:805–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, Hunt R, Rokkas T, Vakil N, Kuipers EJ. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007;56:772–781. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.101634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sugiyama T, Sakaki N, Kozawa H, Sato R, Fujioka T, Satoh K, Sugano K, Sekine H, Takagi A, Ajioka Y, et al. Sensitivity of biopsy site in evaluating regression of gastric atrophy after Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16 Suppl 2:187–190. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.16.s2.17.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vannella L, Lahner E, Bordi C, Pilozzi E, Di Giulio E, Corleto VD, Osborn J, Delle Fave G, Annibale B. Reversal of atrophic body gastritis after H. pylori eradication at long-term follow-up. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:295–299. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McColl KE. Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1597–1604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fock KM, Katelaris P, Sugano K, Ang TL, Hunt R, Talley NJ, Lam SK, Xiao SD, Tan HJ, Wu CY, et al. Second Asia-Pacific Consensus Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1587–1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chey WD, Wong BC. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1808–1825. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jenks PJ. Causes of failure of eradication of Helicobacter pylori. BMJ. 2002;325:3–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7354.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qasim A, O’Morain CA. Review article: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and factors influencing eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16 Suppl 1:24–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.0160s1024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Suzuki T, Matsuo K, Ito H, Sawaki A, Hirose K, Wakai K, Sato S, Nakamura T, Yamao K, Ueda R, et al. Smoking increases the treatment failure for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Am J Med. 2006;119:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mégraud F. H pylori antibiotic resistance: prevalence, importance, and advances in testing. Gut. 2004;53:1374–1384. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.022111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Herscheid AJ, Pot RG, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin, tetracycline and trovafloxacin in The Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43:511–515. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van der Wouden EJ, van Zwet AA, Vosmaer GD, Oom JA, de Jong A, Kleibeuker JH. Rapid increase in the prevalence of metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori in the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:385–389. doi: 10.3201/eid0303.970320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mégraud F. Epidemiology and mechanism of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1278–1282. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vakil N, Megraud F. Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:985–1001. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Broutet N, Tchamgoué S, Pereira E, Lamouliatte H, Salamon R, Mégraud F. Risk factors for failure of Helicobacter pylori therapy--results of an individual data analysis of 2751 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:99–109. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mégraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:280–322. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raymond J, Lamarque D, Kalach N, Chaussade S, Burucoa C. High level of antimicrobial resistance in French Helicobacter pylori isolates. Helicobacter. 2010;15:21–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2009.00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahmad N, Zakaria WR, Mohamed R. Analysis of antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Helicobacter pylori isolates from Malaysia. Helicobacter. 2011;16:47–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2010.00816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fischbach L, Evans EL. Meta-analysis: the effect of antibiotic resistance status on the efficacy of triple and quadruple first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:343–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kobayashi I, Murakami K, Kato M, Kato S, Azuma T, Takahashi S, Uemura N, Katsuyama T, Fukuda Y, Haruma K, et al. Changing antimicrobial susceptibility epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori strains in Japan between 2002 and 2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:4006–4010. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00740-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Horiki N, Omata F, Uemura M, Suzuki S, Ishii N, Iizuka Y, Fukuda K, Fujita Y, Katsurahara M, Ito T, et al. Annual change of primary resistance to clarithromycin among Helicobacter pylori isolates from 1996 through 2008 in Japan. Helicobacter. 2009;14:86–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2009.00714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cuadrado-Lavín A, Salcines-Caviedes JR, Carrascosa MF, Mellado P, Monteagudo I, Llorca J, Cobo M, Campos MR, Ayestarán B, Fernández-Pousa A, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to six antibiotics currently used in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:170–173. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Katelaris PH. Helicobacter pylori: antibiotic resistance and treatment options. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1155–1157. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mégraud F. Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11 Suppl 1:43–53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.11.s1.11.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gisbert JP, Morena F. Systematic review and meta-analysis: levofloxacin-based rescue regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gisbert JP. Second-line rescue therapy of helicobacter pylori infection. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2009;2:331–356. doi: 10.1177/1756283X09347109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Matsumoto Y, Miki I, Aoyama N, Shirasaka D, Watanabe Y, Morita Y, Toyoda M, Mitani T, Miyachi H, Tamura T, et al. Levofloxacin- versus metronidazole-based rescue therapy for H. pylori infection in Japan. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37:821–825. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fujimura S, Kato S, Iinuma K, Watanabe A. In vitro activity of fluoroquinolone and the gyrA gene mutation in Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from children. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:1019–1022. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45642-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bogaerts P, Berhin C, Nizet H, Glupczynski Y. Prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to fluoroquinolones in Helicobacter pylori strains from patients living in Belgium. Helicobacter. 2006;11:441–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim JM, Kim JS, Kim N, Kim SG, Jung HC, Song IS. Comparison of primary and secondary antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations for Helicobacter pylori isolated from Korean patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Glocker E, Stueger HP, Kist M. Quinolone resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:346–349. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00614-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Perna F, Zullo A, Ricci C, Hassan C, Morini S, Vaira D. Levofloxacin-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori re-treatment: role of bacterial resistance. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:1001–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Storskrubb T, Aro P, Ronkainen J, Wreiber K, Nyhlin H, Bolling-Sternevald E, Talley NJ, Engstrand L, Agréus L. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains in a random adult Swedish population. Helicobacter. 2006;11:224–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boyanova L, Ilieva J, Gergova G, Davidkov L, Spassova Z, Kamburov V, Katsarov N, Mitov I. Numerous risk factors for Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance revealed by extended anamnesis: a Bulgarian study. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61:85–93. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.035568-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Seck A, Mbengue M, Gassama-Sow A, Diouf L, Ka MM, Boye CS. Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori isolates in Dakar, Senegal. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3:137–140. doi: 10.3855/jidc.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kato S, Fujimura S. Primary antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in children during the past 9 years. Pediatr Int. 2010;52:187–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rimbara E, Fischbach LA, Graham DY. Optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:79–88. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karita M, Teramukai S, Matsumoto S. Risk of Helicobacter pylori transmission from drinking well water is higher than that from infected intrafamilial members in Japan. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48:1062–1067. doi: 10.1023/a:1023752326137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Goh KL, Chan WK, Shiota S, Yamaoka Y. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection and public health implications. Helicobacter. 2011;16 Suppl 1:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2011.00874.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES