Abstract
Vaccine-mediated prevention of primary infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may require the sustained production of antibody at mucosal portals of entry. Here, we describe a novel approach of repeated mucosal immunization by delivering an HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (gp) in a gel formulated for intravaginal delivery. Rabbits were immunized over one to three 19-day cycles of intravaginal dosing with soluble recombinant trimeric HIV-1 clade C gp140 administered in Carbopol gel. The formulation was well tolerated. A single immunization cycle induced immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody detected in the serum and female genital tract, and titers were boosted on further immunization. Vaccine-induced serum antibodies neutralized the infectivity of a pseudovirus carrying a heterologous clade C envelope. Our data prove the concept that repeated exposure of the female genital tract to HIV envelope can induce mucosally detectable antibody.
INTRODUCTION
Developing a vaccine to protect against infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is complicated by a series of critical issues, not least of which is the problem of how to stimulate protective immunity at mucosal portals of virus entry. In sub-Saharan Africa, heterosexual transmission remains the driving force of the epidemic with women disproportionately infected, particularly those in the 15–24 year age group.1 The exact mechanisms whereby HIV infects across a mucosal barrier are still under intense investigation (reviewed by Shattock and Moore2); however, studies with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) show that once the virus has crossed the vaginal epithelium there is rapid dissemination, although systemic replication may be somewhat delayed.3 On account of this rapid infection dynamic, and because HIV targets the immune system directly and integrates proviral DNA into the genome of target cells, a fully effective HIV vaccine, rather than one that is limited to reducing virus load, will likely completely prevent disseminated infection by stimulating immune effector function actually in the mucosal environment. At present, it is uncertain how to achieve this. Certainly, antibodies have the potential to be effective: intravenous infusion of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies has been shown to protect macaques against vaginal challenge with SIV4,5 however, vaccine-induced immunity is believed to rely mainly on recall of immunological memory, and the conditions required for the sustained production of antibody at the mucosal surface are yet to be established.
The human female genital tract is a site of both inductive and effector immune functions, which are strongly associated with the phases of the menstrual cycle.6 Highly exposed persistently seronegative women have been reported to show mucosal anti-HIV antibody responses.7-10 There are very few reports of vaginal vaccination in women11-13 and, with the exception of one study11 that used inactivated poliovirus, they have involved cholera toxin subunit B, a potent mucosal immunogen that does not require the use of an adjuvant.
We are investigating the potential of a recombinant HIV-1 clade C gp140 formulated in a poly-acrylic acid (Carbopol) gel to induce antibody responses in the lower female genital tract when applied at regular intervals equivalent to the time frame of the inter-menses interval of the human menstrual cycle. The choice of envelope protein was based on the high prevalence of HIV-1 clade C circulating in the world. Our approach builds on the concept of topically applied microbicides: self-administered anti-viral gels applied vaginally and designed for frequent use before each sexual encounter. Ultimately, it may be possible to combine vaginal immunization with the use of vaginal HIV microbicides. Here we show, in the rabbit, that repeated vaginal exposure to recombinant HIV-1 clade C envelope, formulated in a Carbopol gel, is well tolerated, and induces systemic and mucosal immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses.
RESULTS
A single cycle of intravaginal immunization induced serum antibody
A total of 10 rabbits were inoculated intravaginally, each with 620 μl Carbopol gel containing 100 μg of CN54 gp140, on each of 9 occasions every 2 or 3 days over a 19-day period (Group A: Table 1). In addition, six rabbits were similarly inoculated with doses of 400 μl of formulated antigen, equivalent to 65 μg of antigen per dose (Group D). A further 10 animals received 620 μl volumes of Carbopol gel alone (Group B) and 10 animals were sham inoculated (Group C).
Table 1. Assignment of animals to experimental groups.
Group | Treatment | Concentration of vaccine |
No. of immun. cycles |
Number of animals |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maina | Recoveryb | ||||
A | gp140 | 100 μg in 620 μl | 1 | 6 | 4 |
B | Gel control | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
C | Sham control | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
D | gp140 | 65 μg in 400 μl | 1 | 6 | 0 |
E | gp140 | 100 μg in 620 μl | 3 | 6 | 4 |
F | gp140 | 306 μg in 620 μl | 3 | 6 | 4 |
G | Gel control | 0 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
gp, glycoprotein; immun., immunization.
Main group: necropsied 1 day after cessation of immunization.
Recovery group: necropsied 29–30 days after cessation of immunization.
All pre-treatment serum samples and those from control groups, at every time point, tested negative for CN54-specific IgG and IgA antibodies. Sera from animals in Group A tested 1 day after the final intravaginal inoculation (day 20) were all positive for IgG antibody, with titers ranging from 1,050 to 22,500 (Figure 1a). In animals no. 27, no. 28, no. 29, and no. 30, which were also tested 30 days after receiving the final dose of antigen (day 49), titers were either maintained or had increased (range 5,230–11,070); however, only animals no. 1, no. 2, no. 4, and no. 5 of the 6 animals of Group D had sero-converted to IgG antibody by 1 day after cessation of intravaginal dosing, with titers ranging from 650 to 5,000. In animals no. 4 and no. 5, corresponding to those with the highest titers at day 20, specific IgG antibody was detectable, at low titer, by day 13 (Figure 1a). The median IgG antibody titer induced in Group A was significantly higher than that induced in Group D measured at day 20; 3,275 compared with 785, P = 0.02; Mann–Whitney rank sum test. All serum samples, regardless of antigen dose, tested negative for specific IgA.
A single cycle of intravaginal immunization induced serum HIV-1-neutralizing antibody
Sera from Group A animals were analyzed for virus infectivity neutralizing activity (Figure 1b). No activity was detected pre-immunization. After immunization, 6 of 10 vaccinates (animal no. 21, no. 22, no. 24, no. 25, no. 27, and no. 30) showed anti-tier 1 clade C (MW965.26) neutralizing titers ranging from 20 to 148. Of the 4 recovery group animals, no. 27 and no. 30 had neutralizing activity at day 49, but only in animal no. 30 was the neutralizing antibody detected at day 20. Interestingly, the rise in binding antibody titer over the same period (Figure 1a) was relatively modest. Only 3 of 10 animals (no. 22, no. 23, and no. 30) generated neutralizing antibody against tier 2 clade C 96ZM651.02 pseudovirus with very low titers ranging from 22 to 28, and this was not directly associated with titers against tier 1 virus. An autologous CN54 Env pseudotype virus was not available.
A single cycle of intravaginal immunization induced mucosally detectable antibody
Eluates from vestibular and vaginal spears taken at necropsy from Group A animals and from control animals (Groups B and C) were first screened undiluted for gp140-specific IgG. All samples from Group A rabbits, including those from the four recovery group animals sampled 30 days after cessation of immunization, tested positive, with absorbance values ranging from 0.406 to 3.95 (Figure 2). Samples from the control groups were negative. There was no statistical difference between the median absorbance values obtained from paired samples taken from the vestibule and the vagina (P = 0.34; Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
Immunoglobulin A antibody was not detected on subsequent screening of vaginal and vestibule eluates; however, this analysis was done after an additional freeze–thaw cycle, which also resulted in an appreciable reduction in absorbance values for IgG antibody (data not shown). Nonetheless, in vaginal samples from seven rabbits, in which sufficient volume was available for testing, titers of gp140-specific IgG ranged from 1 to 65.
Mucosal eluates from Group D were subject to only a single freeze–thaw cycle. In animals no. 1, no. 2, no. 4, and no. 5, corresponding to those with serum IgG titers, specific IgG was detected in both vaginal and vestibule samples. Interestingly, despite the absence of serum IgA antibody, four animals (no. 2, no. 3, no. 5, and no. 6) had detectable IgA antibody in vaginal and/or vestibule samples, and in rabbits no. 3 and no. 6, this was detected in the absence of mucosal or serum IgG antibody (Table 2). Volume limitation precluded further analysis.
Table 2. Detection of anti-gp140 antibodies in genital tract secretions from rabbits immunized with a single cycle of nine intravaginal doses of 65 μg gp140 (Group D): comparison with serum antibody titers.
Animal no. | Vaginal IgG antibody (titer) |
Vestibule IgG antibody (titer) |
Serum IgG antibody (titer) |
Vaginal IgA antibody (A450) |
Vestibule IgA antibody (A450) |
Serum IgA antibody (titer) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 700 | 145 | 5,000 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 10 |
2 | 130 | 10 | 920 | 0.34 | 1.13 | < 10 |
1 | 45 | 80 | 650 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 10 |
5 | 27 | 70 | 1,560 | < 0.2 | 0.37 | < 10 |
3 | < 1 | < 1 | < 100 | < 0.2 | 0.23 | < 10 |
6 | < 1 | < 1 | < 100 | 0.29 | 0.42 | < 10 |
gp, glycoprotein; Ig, immunoglobulin.
End-point titers are shown except for IgA in secretions in which undiluted samples were analysed because of volume limitations
Two cycles of intravaginal immunization boosted serum antibody titers
Next, the effects of multiple cycles of immunization and dose were investigated. All animals immunized with one cycle of 9×100 μg doses (Group E) made a serum IgG response as noted previously in Group A, and 9 of 10 animals receiving 306 μg (Group F) also responded (Figure 3). There was no statistical difference between median titers in Groups E and F (P = 0.47; Mann–Whitney rank sum test). After a further cycle of immunization, individual antibody titers were boosted in all animals in each group, giving a significant increase in group mean titers (P = 0.008, Group E; P < 0.001, Group F; paired t-test), but there was no difference between groups (P = 0.91; Mann–Whitney rank sum test). A further round of immunization did not significantly increase the mean titer in either group (P = 0.97, Group E; P = 0.11, Group F; paired t-test). Although the higher dose of antigen (Group F) did not significantly increase titer, there was a tighter clustering of “high responders” compared with Group E; furthermore, the third cycle of immunization in Group F boosted titer in animal no. 313 to reach the “high”-responder group. Anti-gp140 IgG titers were invariably lower after the 29-day “recovery phase” compared with those measured 1 day after cessation of the third cycle of immunization.
Nine animals in each group mounted low titer serum IgA anti-CN54 gp140 responses (data not shown). In both groups, no IgA was detected after a single cycle of intravaginal immunization. However, after a second cycle of immunization, eight animals in each group had detectable IgA antibodies with titers ranging from 15 to 58 in Group E and from 13 to 56 in Group F at day 48. A further animal in each group seroconverted for IgA antibody after a third cycle of immunization. Animals with delayed sero-conversion corresponded to those with the lowest IgG titers after one cycle of immunization, whereas the two unresponsive animals corresponded to the animals with the lowest IgG titers after three cycles of immunization (animals no. 225 and no. 315). Two of four animals from Group E and all four animals from Group F had IgA antibody still detectable 29 days after cessation of immunization.
Multiple cycles of intravaginal immunization augmented serum HIV-1-neutralizing antibody titers against tier 1 virus, but did not induce activity against tier 1 envelope pseudotype
Virus neutralizing titer was determined after two cycles of intravaginal immunization with either 100 μg doses (Group E) or 306 μg doses (Group F). Comparison of results for neutralization of tier 1 virus after a single cycle of immunization (Group A, Figure 1b) with that after the second cycle of immunization (Group E, Figure 4a) at 100 μg doses revealed a highly significant difference (P < 0.001; Mann–Whitney rank sum test). There was no significant difference, however, between virus neutralizing titer obtained after two cycles of immunization with 100 μg or 306 μg dosing (P = 0.97; Mann–Whitney rank sum test) (Figures 4a and b). There was insufficient sample volume for analysis after three cycles of immunization; however, titers determined in the “recovery” group animals indicated that neutralizing activity was present 29 days after cessation of the third cycle of immunization at levels that were not significantly different to those detected at the cessation of the second cycle of immunization (P = 0.625 for both groups; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Overall, anti-tier 1 virus neutralizing titers correlated with gp140-binding antibody titers measured by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) (r = 0.796; P < 0.001, Pearson product moment correlation); however, when analyzed by group, only Group E receiving 100 μg doses of gp140 showed significant correlation (r = 0.93; P < 0.001), whereas data from Group F was poorly correlated (r = 0.5; P = 0.06). Despite multiple immunizations, neutralization of tier 2 envelope pseudotype virus was not detected.
Multiple cycles of intravaginal immunization augmented specific IgG titers detected in the genital tract, but did not induce an IgA-specific response
Screening of undiluted mucosal eluates by ELISA revealed that all samples from Groups E and F, regardless of sampling site, gave saturating absorbance values for IgG antibody, whereas all samples from Group G (gel control) failed to bind. In contrast, IgA antibody was undetectable in any sample, despite the detection of total IgA. Titration of mucosal samples showed that IgG antibody titers normalized against the total IgG content of each sample (specific antibody activity) did not differ significantly between animals immunized with 100 μg doses of gp140 (Group E) and those with 306 μg doses (Group F) (Figure 5). Although normalized titers were somewhat lower in both vaginal and vestibular samples taken at day 104 compared with those taken immediately after cessation of immunization, this difference only reached statistical significance in vaginal samples from Group E (P = 0.038; Mann–Whitney rank sum test).
To determine whether the mucosally detected antibody was the result of serum exudation, the normalized anti-gp140 antibody titers for mucosal samples were compared pairwise with specific antibody activity in the corresponding serum sample. For both vaginal and vestibular samples, there was a highly statistically significant difference compared with serum (P < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The proportion of specific antibody detected in mucosal samples was always higher than that detected in serum, being on average 8.5-fold higher in vaginal samples (range 1.4 to 25) and 9.0-fold higher in vestibular samples (range 2–22.8).
The serum antibody response induced by multiple cycles of intravaginal vaccination was predominantly against the gp120 region of the gp140 antigen
To determine the breadth of antigen recognition after intravaginal immunization, sera taken after three cycles of immunization or, where there was insufficient volume, after two cycles of immunization, were first screened on pools of peptides, available to the project, covering the predicted amino acid sequence of the entire gp140 of a prototypic clade C virus, 96ZM651. Frequency of recognition varied markedly and only 5 of 20 sera recognized peptides in the gp41-ED (external domain) of gp140 (Figure 6a). In general, the number of pools recognized was positively associated with the anti-gp140-binding titer, but there was no absolute correspondence; neither was there a direct association between breadth of recognition and the number of cycles or immunizing dose. The number of pools recognized after two cycles of immunization was, in general, positively associated with the anti-tier 1 virus neutralization titer.
Next, sera that screened positive against peptide pools were tested against each individual peptide component of the pool. The frequency of recognition was compared with results obtained with sera from non-clade-typed HIV-positive individuals (Figure 6b). Strikingly, all immunized rabbits recognized the V3 region, whereas this was recognized in only 20 percent of the human HIV+ sera. In general, regions within C1 were recognized after immunization, and the distribution of binding suggested the presence of multiple epitopes. The V1 and V2 regions were infrequently recognized by the rabbit sera and, surprisingly, were neither recognized by human sera, possibly because of clade specificity. Only a minority of sera bound to peptides in the V4, C4, and V5 regions, although a somewhat higher frequency of recognition was seen with rabbit sera recognizing the C5 region. All human sera recognized the highly immunodominant domain in the gp41-ED (residues 598–609) and the majority recognized the region 586–597 upstream of the immunodominant epitope. Notably, this region was not recognized by sera from immunized rabbits.
To determine whether antibodies specifically able to bind to higher order gp140 structures were elicited, sera from immunized rabbits were analyzed for their oligomer binding under nondenaturing conditions. Reactivity with CN54 gp140 trimer was detected only after multiple immunization cycles (Table 3, Figure 7). In general, the readout from the oligomer assay reflected the titer of IgG antibody determined by ELISA (Figure 3). When tested at 1/5, all sera with anti-tier 1 neutralization titers above 1,000 prevented or reduced detection of trimeric gp140. At 1/20, however, the threshold of reactivity was less defined. A total of 7 of 11 sera with anti-tier 1 neutralization titers >1,300 prevented or reduced detection of trimeric gp140; however, sera from rabbits no. 317, no. 330, no. 327 (day 104), and no. 224 failed to react despite neutralizing titers of 8,255, 4,576, 4,212, and 3,460, respectively. Three compared with two cycles of immunization and 100 μg compared with 306 μg doses were not found to differentially confer advantage in terms of antibody recognition of trimeric gp140. The results also show that the majority of the antigen, at least in native gel buffer, was in the trimeric form, with some dimer and only trace amounts of monomer detectable.
Table 3. Reactivity of rabbit sera with trimeric gp140.
Serum 1/5 |
Serum 1/20 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animal no. | Group | Day 20 | Day 48 | Day 76 | Day 104 | Day 20 | Day 48 | Day 76 | Day 104 |
119 | G | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + |
207 | E | + + | + + | # | NA | + + | + + | + | NA |
208 | + + | + | +/− | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA | |
209 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | +/− | +/− | NA | |
210 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | +/− | +/− | NA | |
211 | + + | + + | + | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA | |
212 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | + | + | NA | |
223 | + + | + + | − | + | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
224 | + + | +/− | − | +/− | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
225 | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
226 | + + | − | − | − | + + | + | − | + | |
313 | F | + + | + + | + | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA |
314 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | + | + | NA | |
315 | + + | + + | + + | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA | |
316 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | +/− | − | NA | |
317 | + + | − | − | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA | |
318 | + + | + | − | NA | + + | + + | + + | NA | |
327 | + + | − | ND | + | + + | + | ND | + + | |
328 | + + | + | ND | +/− | + + | + + | ND | + + | |
330 | + + | − | ND | − | + + | + + | ND | + + |
+ + , gp140 trimer band at intensity equal to that after reaction with pre-immunization serum; +, +/−, −, relative intensity of gp140 trimer band; # result undetermined because of gel artefact; gp, glycoprotein; NA, not applicable; ND, not done.
Sera were incubated with unlabelled gp140 vaccine preparation and residual unreacted gp140 oligomers separated by native gel electrophoresis. After elec-troblotting, separated proteins were detected with labeled human monoclonal antibodies. Sera with high reactivity against nondenatured trimeric gp140 formed immune complexes that were unable to enter the native gel and therefore scored negative.
Carbopol and Carbopol-gp140 formulation were well tolerated
Treatment of rabbits with the CN54 gp140-Carbopol gel formulation or Carbopol gel alone, regardless of dosing schedule, resulted in no signs of systemic toxicity. Clinical condition, body weight, and food consumption all remained unaffected. No treatment-related ophthalmic lesions were seen, and hematological and blood chemistry analyses revealed no treatment-related effects. Likewise, no macroscopic findings or differences in organ weight, attributable to treatment, were found at necropsy.
Analysis of histological changes in the vagina indicated that cumulative scores for all animals, regardless of the concentration or frequency of administration of the product, all fell within the acceptable range for human vaginal irritation potential.
DISCUSSION
This is the first demonstration that soluble recombinant HIV-1 gp140 is immunogenic on repeated intravaginal immunization in the absence of a mucosal adjuvant such as those derived from bacterial enterotoxins. Moreover, the formulation was well tolerated in the rabbit vaginal irritancy model, even after multiple cycles of high-dose administration. The data indicate that the safety profile is acceptable for human clinical trial, in which the same antigen formulation will be administered nine times through the inter-menses interval to cover the optimum time for immune induction and response. Although the study design in rabbits was not optimized for the analysis of immune response dynamics, it was encouraging that a single cycle of intravaginal administration of the formulated antigen elicited serum antibodies and IgG antibodies detected in mucosal secretions. Carbopol gel was used as a carrier, as it is approved for vaginal use in women, being a component of licensed vaginal products and experimental HIV microbicide formulations. Although we cannot rule out that the Carbopol contributed to the generation of the responses reported here (although Carbopol showed no adjuvanticity when used vaginally in combination with gp140 in mice; Q Sattentau, personal communication), it probably acted as an inert carrier aiding retention of the gp140 antigen in the vaginal vault. Other formulations containing multiple polymer components, including a mucoadhesive and hydrophilic matrix-forming polymer together with a polymeric component capable of absorbing vaginal fluid designed to enhance retention, are also giving promising results.14
A single immunization cycle with 100 μg doses of gp140 was clearly superior to 65 μg doses, administered at the same concentration, in terms of eliciting serum IgG antibody, and a significant booster effect was seen after a further cycle of immunization; however, increasing the dose of antigen to 306 μg per administration failed to increase the overall titer as did administration of a further cycle of immunization at either dose, suggesting that the saturating dose of antigen had been reached for these conditions. Only after multiple cycles of intravaginal immunization was serum IgA antibody detected, but this was of low titer and not present in all animals. Surprisingly, perhaps, IgA antibody was detected in vaginal and vestibular secretions only in the animals given a single cycle of 65 μg doses and only in some animals at a low level. Although technical limitations precluded analysis of Group A, there was no evidence of local IgA antibody production in animals receiving multiple cycles of immunization at the higher doses of antigen. In contrast, IgG antibodies were readily detected in mucosal secretions and reached highest titers after multiple cycles of immunization. In another study in progress using a similar formulation, vaginal IgA was detected in mice but not in rabbits (Q Sattentau, personal communication). These results contrast those described after intravaginal immunization of rabbits with HPV 6bL1 DNA, in which IgA antibodies were elicited in the absence of IgG antibody.15 However, this latter study differed from that described here in using plasmid DNA, the co-administration of cholera toxin, and the use of mucosal injection within the vagina. The lack of mucosal IgA in the present study may be associated with the soluble nature of the antigen used.16,17 Furthermore, at least in humans, cervico-vaginal fluid contains more IgG than IgA,18 and the endocervix contains a high proportion of IgG antibody-secreting cells.19 In the present study, the lack of a rabbit IgA standard precluded direct analysis of the relative concentrations of total IgG and IgA. However, the higher specific activity of IgG antibody detected in the mucosal samples compared with that detected in serum suggests that, at least in part, the antibody may have been synthesized locally by B cell antibody-secreting cells in the mucosa. Moreover, antibody detected in the lower reproductive tract may have been produced at multiple sites, including those in the upper tract, because of the propensity of material to be transported upstream after intravaginal administration. It is also likely that, as has been reported in HIV infection,20 serum transudation also contributed to the antibody detected locally.
The suitability of the rabbit for the assessment of intravaginal immunogenicity, as opposed to irritancy determination, is unknown. The anatomy of the lower female genital tract of the rabbit is a complicating factor as the upper two-thirds of the vagina has a nonstratified epithelium that may be more susceptible to antigen uptake. Moreover, the physiology of the rabbit reproductive cycle is markedly different from humans. Rabbits are induced ovulators and, therefore, are not suitable for modelling directly the effects of the human reproductive cycle on immune response generation. Indeed species differences may, at least in part, account for the reported contradictory observations regarding the efficacy of the female genital tract as a site for induction of antibody responses.13 Nonetheless, the detection of antibody in both the circulation and in the genital tract shows that the concept of repeated or sustained mucosal exposure to a putative vaccine antigen is promising.
Not only is there a requirement for sustained production of antibody into the female genital tract but this antibody must also have potent virus infectivity neutralizing activity if sterilizing immunity is to be achieved. The envelope antigen used in the present study has shown remarkable trimeric stability in vitro (D Katinger, personal communication), and this is considered highly desirable to focus the antibody response onto structures that may more accurately mimic those seen within the virus envelope spike.21 Intravaginal immunization clearly induced virus neutralizing activity that was boosted significantly by two cycles of immunization. Notably, however, activity was only seen against the more easily neutralized envelope. The almost complete lack of activity against tier 2 envelope pseudotype, even after three rounds of immunization, was disappointing but it is well recognized that the envelope spikes of HIV primary isolates are hidden from antibody recognition by a number of mechanisms including glycan shielding,22,23 the presence of sequence variable loops24 and conformational masking,25 and even an intrinsic resistance of surface external regions of gp120 to allow access of antibody to artificially introduced tags.26 Indeed it was interesting that rabbits produced antibodies that recognized the linear epitopes within the V3 region. This region is considered occluded on many primary isolates and this may, at least in part, explain the lack of neutralizing activity in these sera against the tier 2 envelope pseudotype virus. If so, then the recognition of this region after immunization may indicate that the trimeric structure of the antigen used here was markedly different from the virus spike. Furthermore, major differences were noted when reactivity of sera from immunized rabbits was compared with sera from HIV-infected individuals, most notably in the failure of rabbits to recognize the highly immunodominant region of gp41.27 Although in this study a highly stable trimeric gp140 was used, the immunogenic profile of this envelope could be influenced by several factors including formulation within the Carbopol gel, enzymatic degradation in vivo, and the use of a recombinant molecule in which a soluble molecule was created by termination before the membrane anchor. Nonetheless, the native binding assay confirmed directly that antibodies from immunized rabbits were able to bind to the trimeric gp140 used as the immunogen. This type of assay has been used as a surrogate for monoclonal antibody and polyclonal sera-mediated virus neutralization.28,29
The lower female genital tract has been described as a poor inductive site for adaptive immunity in the absence of strong adjuvants.18 In this context, our observation of systemic and mucosal immune responses after repeated vaginal exposure to recombinant HIV-1 clade C envelope, in a gel formulation without adjuvant, is encouraging. Ongoing studies in small animals, humans, and macaques will determine whether such responses to gel formulations can be improved after priming through different routes (intramuscular or intranasal, for example). The lack of detectable inflammation suggests that such gel-based formulations would be unlikely to enhance HIV transmission and that they would be compatible for co-delivery with candidate microbicides, designed for frequent use before each sexual encounter. The co-formulation with a topical microbicide might facilitate serial boosting of specific immune responses, supplementing the antiviral effect of the microbicide and reducing the chance of viral breakthrough against either intervention strategy.
METHODS
HIV gp140
A clade C envelope clone p97CN54 was obtained originally from HIV isolated from a Chinese patient30,31 and was made available by H Wolf and R Wagner, University of Regensburg, Germany. Trimeric gp140 (gp120 plus the ED of gp41), designated as CN54 gp140, was produced as a recombinant product in CHO cells and manufactured to good manufacturing practice specification by Polymun Scientific, Vienna, Austria.
Animals
New Zealand white rabbits (10–14-week-old) were supplied from an accredited closed colony, and the animals were housed at, and all in vivo procedures carried out by, a contract research organization in compliance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and associated Codes of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals.
Intravaginal inoculation
Animals were assigned to experimental groups (Table 1). Immediately before inoculation, gp140 was formulated at the required concentration in Carbopol gel consisting of (w/w) water, 97.81%; benzyl alcohol, 1.09%; Carbopol 974P, 0.92%; sodium hydroxide, 0.18%. A total of 620 μl or 400 μl of the mixture was administered through a soft rubber catheter inserted ~6 cm into the vagina. For any one cycle of intravaginal inoculation, animals received formulated product on nine occasions at days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, and 19 to mimic immunization through a human menstrual cycle. Necropsies were performed either 1 day after the final inoculation (main group) or 4 weeks later (recovery group). This timing interval was determined by the requirement for assessment of vaginal irritancy.
Assessment of systemic toxic potential and vaginal irritancy
Animals were inspected regularly for evidence of reaction to treatment or ill health. Before each intravaginal administration, animals were observed for signs of vulval irritation, discharge, or bleeding from the vagina. Body weights were recorded regularly. Samples were taken regularly for hematology and blood chemistry. At necropsy, special attention was given to the examination of the vagina and cervix, and detailed histopathology was carried out on transverse samples (~10 mm) collected from the cervical and urethral ends of the vagina. Histological changes in the vagina were scored using methods modified from those of Eckstein et al.32
Blood and genital tract secretions
Peripheral blood was collected for serum before study commencement and after intravaginal vaccinations. Secretions from the vagina and the vestibule were sampled using Weck-Cel surgical spears (Medtronic Ophthalmics, Jacksonville, FL) postmortem from tissues that had been removed for this specific purpose, so as not to interfere with histological analysis. A sterile spear was placed on the mucosal surface of the vagina for 2 min to absorb any secretion. A second spear was placed on the mucosal surface of the vestibule. Secretions were eluted from the sponges by placing each spear into a Spin-X tube (Corning, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands) containing 300 μl extraction buffer (protease inhibitor cocktail set 1, Calbiochem Merck, Beeston, UK). Samples were frozen at −80 °C and centrifuged before testing.
Enzyme-linked immunosobent assay
Binding antibodies against recombinant CN54 gp140 were measured using a standardized ELISA. CN54 gp140 was coated onto 96-well plates (medium binding, Greiner Bio-One, Stonehouse, UK) at 5 μg ml−1 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed four times in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) before blocking with PBS-T containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 1 h at 37 °C. After further washing, sera diluted in PBS-T or mucosal eluates were added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. For IgG, bound antibody was detected with mouse monoclonal anti-rabbit IgG (γ chain-specific) peroxidase conjugate (A1949, Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK). Normal rabbit serum was used as a negative control. Standard curves for IgG detection were derived using rabbit antiserum to HIV-1 GB8 gp120 (Programme EVA, Centre for AIDS Reagents, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, ARP440.1/R546). IgA antibody was detected with biotin-conjugated goat IgG fraction of goat antiserum to rabbit IgA (α chain-specific ABN116B, Autogen Bioclear, Calne, UK) followed by avidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (A7419, Sigma Aldrich). The goat antiserum was generated using purified polyclonal IgA from pooled rabbit serum and, therefore, would be expected to react against all rabbit IgA isotypes.
For linear epitope analysis, plates were coated with 15mer peptides overlapping 11 residues, spanning a prototypic clade C gp140 sequence (96ZM651),31 either in pools of 10 or singly.
Virus infectivity neutralization assay
Neutralizing antibody responses were measured using a luciferase-based assay in TZM.bl cells as previously described.33 This assay measures the reduction in luciferase reporter gene expression in TZM.bl cells after a single round of virus infection. The 50% inhibitory dose (ID50) titer was calculated as the serum dilution that caused a 50% reduction in relative luminescence units compared with the virus control wells after subtraction of cell control relative luminescence units. Stocks of Env-pseudotyped viruses were prepared by transfection of 293T/17 cells as previously described.33
gp140 oligomer-binding assay
CN54 gp140 at a concentration of 530 μg ml−1 was mixed with 1/5 or 1/20 serum at a ratio of 1:1. After incubation overnight at 4 ° C, samples were applied to native tris-acetate polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Separated proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and after blocking with 3% (w/v) skimmed milk powder in PBS-T, transferred proteins were detected using a combination of human monoclonal antibodies:34 1F7, 3B7, Hansi, 3D6, 5F3, 4B3, and 4D4 each at a concentration of ~1 μg ml−1 followed by goat anti-human IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma Aldrich). Fluorescence was measured by laser scanning.
Statistical analysis
Specified analyses were performed using SigmaPlot version 11 software (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by a grant to SGUL by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, under the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative and by a grant to Harvard Medical School by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery/Comprehensive Antibody – Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortium, grant number 38619. We thank Professors Ralf Wagner and Hans Wolf, University of Regensburg and GENEART AG for the CN54-expressing plasmid and Dr Edward Tarelli, Medical Biomics Centre, St George’s University of London for mass spectrometry analysis of the recombinant protein. MC is supported by the Sir Joseph Hotung Trust. We thank Sueli Vieira and Saba Hussein for work on gp140 cloning and expression.
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. 2008 UNAIDS/08.25E/JC1510E ( www.unaids.org)
- 2.Shattock RJ, Moore JP. Inhibiting sexual transmission of HIV-1 infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2003;1:25–34. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller CJ, et al. Propagation and dissemination of infection after vaginal transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 2005;79:9217–9227. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9217-9227.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mascola JR, et al. Protection of macaques against vaginal transmission of a pathogenic HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus by passive infusion of neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Med. 2000;6:207–10. doi: 10.1038/72318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parren RW, et al. Antibody protects macaques against vaginal challenge with a pathogenic R5 simian/human immunodeficiency virus at serum levels giving complete neutralization in vitro. J. Virol. 2001;75:8340–8347. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8340-8347.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kozlowski PA, et al. Differential induction of mucosal and systemic antibody responses in women after nasal, rectal, or vaginal immunization: influence of the menstrual cycle. J. Immunol. 2002;169:566–574. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mazzoli S, et al. HIV-specific mucosal and cellular immunity in HIV-seronegative partners of HIV-seropositive individuals. Nat. Med. 1997;3:1250–1257. doi: 10.1038/nm1197-1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Devito C, et al. Mucosal and plasma IgA from HIV-exposed seronegative individuals neutralize a primary HIV-1 isolate. AIDS. 2000;14:1917–1920. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200009080-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ghys PD, et al. Cervicovaginal anti-HIV antibodies in HIV-seronegative female sex workers in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. AIDS. 2000;14:2603–2608. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200011100-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Belec L, et al. Cervicovaginal secretory antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that block viral transcytosis through tight epithelial barriers in highly exposed HIV-1-seronegative African women. J. Infect. Dis. 2001;184:1412–1422. doi: 10.1086/324375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ogra P, Ogra SS. Local antibody response to poliovirus in the human female genital tract. J. Immunol. 1973;110:1307–1311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wassen L, Schön K, Holmgren J, Jertborn M, Lycke N. Local intravaginal vaccination of the female genital tract. Scand. J. Immunol. 1996;44:408–414. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1996.d01-320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kozlowski PA, Cu-Uvin S, Neutra MR, Flanigan TP. Comparison of the oral, rectal, and vaginal immunization routes for induction of antibodies in rectal and genital secretions of women. Infect. Immunol. 1997;65:1387–1394. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.4.1387-1394.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Curran RM, et al. Vaginal delivery of the recombinant HIV-1 clade-C trimeric gp140 envelope protein ZM96gp140 within novel rheologically structured vehicles elicits specific immune responses. Vaccine. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.088. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schreckenberger C, et al. Induction of an HPV 6bL1-specific mucosal IgA response by DNA immunization. Vaccine. 2001;19:227–233. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00173-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tommaso AD, et al. Induction of antigen-specific antibodies in vaginal secretions by using a nontoxic mutant of heat-labile enterotoxin as a mucosal adjuvant. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:974–979. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.3.974-979.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Walker RI. New strategies for using mucosal vaccination to achieve more effective immunization. Vaccine. 1994;12:387–400. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)90112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mestecky J, Moldoveanu Z, Russell MW. Immunologic uniqueness of the genital tract: challenge for vaccine development. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2005;53:208–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crowley-Nowick PA, et al. Normal uterine cervix: characterization of isolated lymphocyte phenotypes and immunoglobulin secretion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1995;34:241–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1995.tb00948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Belec L, Tevi-Benissan C, Lu XS, Prazuck T, Pillot J. Local synthesis of IgG antibodies to HIV within the female and male genital tracts during asymptomatic and pre-AIDS stages of HIV infection. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 1995;11:719–729. doi: 10.1089/aid.1995.11.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Burton DR, et al. HIV vaccine design and the neutralizing antibody problem. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:233–236. doi: 10.1038/ni0304-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reitter JN, Means RE, Desrosiers RC. A role for carbohydrates in immune evasion in AIDS. Nat. Med. 1998;4:679–684. doi: 10.1038/nm0698-679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McCaffrey RA, Saunders C, Hensel M, Stamatatos L. N-linked glycosylation of the V3 loop and the immunologically silent face of gp120 protects human immunodeficiency virus type 1 SF162 from neutralization by anti-gp120 and anti-gp41 antibodies. J. Virol. 2004;78:3279–3295. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3279-3295.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pinter A, Honnen WJ, He Y, Gorny MK, Zolla-Pazner S, Kayman SC. The V1/V2 domain of gp120 is a global regulator of the sensitivity of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates to neutralization by antibodies commonly induced upon infection. J. Virol. 2004;78:5205–5215. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5205-5215.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kwong PD, et al. HIV-1 evades antibody-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-binding sites. Nature. 2002;420:678–682. doi: 10.1038/nature01188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pantophlet R, Wang M, Aguilar-Sino RO, Burton DR. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope spike of primary viruses can suppress antibody access to variable regions. J. Virol. 2009;83:1649–1659. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02046-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gnann JW, Nelson JA, Oldstone MB. Fine mapping of an immunodominant domain in the transmembrane glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 1987;61:2639–2641. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.8.2639-2641.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moore PL, et al. Nature of nonfunctional envelope proteins on the surface of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2006;80:2515–2528. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.5.2515-2528.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crooks ET, et al. A comparative immunogenicity study of HIV-1 virus-like particles bearing various forms of envelope proteins, particles bearing no envelope and soluble monomeric gp120. Virology. 2007;366:245–262. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Su L, et al. Characterization of a virtually full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome of a prevalent intersubtype (C/B’) recombinant strain in china. J Virol. 2000;74:11367–11376. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.23.11367-11376.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rodenburg CM, et al. Near full-length clones and reference sequences for subtype C isolates of HIV type 1 from three different continents. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 2001;17:161–168. doi: 10.1089/08892220150217247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Eckstein P, Jackson MC, Millman N, Sobrero AJ. Comparison of vaginal tolerance tests of spermicidal preparations in rabbits and monkeys. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1969;20:85–93. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0200085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li M, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env clones from acute and early subtype B infections for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies. J. Virol. 2005;79:10108–10125. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.16.10108-10125.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Buchacher A, et al. Generation of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 proteins; electrofusion and Epstein-Barr virus transformation for peripheral blood lymphocyte immortalization. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 1994;10:359–369. doi: 10.1089/aid.1994.10.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Korber BTM, Brander C, Haynes BF, Koup R, Moore JP, Walker BD, Watkins DI, editors. HIV Molecular Immunology 2006/2007 LA-UR 07-4752. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Biology and Biophysics; Los Alamos, New Mexico: [Google Scholar]