Abstract
Systemic hormonal control exerts its effect through the regulation of local target tissues, which in turn regulate upstream signals in a feedback loop. The parathyroid hormone (PTH) axis is a well defined hormonal signaling system that regulates calcium levels and bone metabolism. To understand the interplay between systemic and local signaling in bone, we examined the effects of deficiency of the bone matrix protein osteopontin (OPN) on the systemic effects of PTH specifically within osteoblastic cell lineages. Parathyroid hormone receptor (PPR) transgenic mice expressing a constitutively active form of the receptor (caPPR) specifically in cells of the osteoblast lineage have a high bone mass phenotype. In these mice, OPN deficiency further increased bone mass. This increase was associated with conversion of the major intertrabecular cell population from hematopoietic cells to stromal/osteoblastic cells and parallel elevations in histomorphometric and biochemical parameters of bone formation and resorption. Treatment with small interfering RNA (siRNA) for osteopontin enhanced H223R mutant caPPR-induced cAMP-response element (CRE) activity levels by about 10-fold. Thus, in addition to the well known calcemic feedback system for PTH, local feedback regulation by the bone matrix protein OPN also plays a significant role in the regulation of PTH actions.
Body homeostasis is maintained under a precise coordination of systemic hormones and local cytokines and an imbalance in this regulation leads to pathological situations and disorders. Hormones affect multiple organs, and tight feedback systems exist between upstream and downstream organs. In addition, target organs by themselves are horizontally linked with each other, making the whole system versatile but complex. This makes it difficult to identify points of malfunction of the system in pathological situations. It is, therefore, necessary to identify a well delineated system to unravel new layers of regulation in the hormonal control of homeostasis.
The parathyroid hormone (PTH)2 axis is a well defined hormonal system that maintains the calcium level in body fluid. Proper calcium levels are critical for numerous cellular activities. Parathyroid hormone is secreted from the parathyroid gland, which senses small reductions in blood calcium levels (1). PTH acts systemically on targets such as kidney and bone to correct calcium levels in the blood. These target organs of PTH are themselves horizontally linked. For instance, PTH acts on the kidney to produce an active form of vitamin D, which in turn affects cellular activities in bone and increases calcium absorption from intestine (2–4). These direct and indirect (horizontal) actions of PTH eventually result in an increase in the blood calcium, which in turn reduces the release of PTH from the parathyroid gland to complete the cycle of these calcemic events. Furthermore, antagonists such as calcitonin counteract procalcemic actions of PTH and maintain the homeostasis of blood calcium levels (5).
In addition to this systemic role in maintenance of calcium levels in body fluids, PTH also modulates local events such as vasodilation (6) and accumulation of bone mass (7). In fact, PTH increases bone formation and is approved as a drug for severe osteoporosis, where there is solid evidence for its ability to reduce fracture risk (8–11). Understanding the mechanism of these anabolic actions of PTH in bone is valuable in the light of two major aspects. First, administration of PTH to patients is restricted to only two years, in part resulting from concern for development of osteosarcoma, as found in preclinical studies (12). Currently, no rational counter-modalities are available for osteosarcoma. Second, fractures in patients treated with PTH still occurs, although the rate is significantly reduced (13). This fact indicates that PTH alone is not enough to fully prevent fractures associated with osteoporosis (14, 15).
Although antagonists for systemic calcemic actions of PTH are relatively well studied, local antagonists of PTH action in bone are poorly understood. We have recently observed that the anabolic action of PTH at an optimal dosage was enhanced in mice deficient in osteopontin (OPN) (16), suggesting that OPN plays a role as a local antagonist. OPN is a major non-collagenous protein expressed by osteoblasts and primarily localized on bone surfaces and in the cement lines in bone. OPN accumulates in mineralized bone matrix, supports attachment of bone cells to matrix surfaces, and inhibits hydroxyapatite crystal formation and growth. Furthermore, OPN functions as a cytokine acting on intracellular signaling pathways through its interaction with receptors. OPN is involved in a variety of cellular events such as proliferation, apoptosis, and chemotaxis (17, 18).
OPN-deficient mice are fertile, their litter size is normal, and they develop normally. Bones and teeth of OPN-null mice are morphologically normal. Furthermore, osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vivo do not show major abnormalities in OPN-null mice (19). OPN-null mice exhibit impaired type 1 immunity to viral and bacterial infection (20) and are resistant to ovariectomy-induced (21) or unloading-induced bone loss (22).
Col1a1-caPPR transgenic (PPR-tg) expresses a constitutively active form of the PTH receptor specifically in osteoblasts under the control of the collagen α1 promoter. These mice have increased trabecular bone volume and a decrease in cortical bone thickness (23). The transgenic mice show an increased number of osteoblast precursors and mature osteoblasts as well as osteoclasts. Histological examination revealed an intense staining for OPN in trabecular bone in these mice, suggesting a role for OPN in this system (24), but the nature of this role is not known.
Because injection of PTH has systemic effects and OPN is expressed by diverse cell types in the body, it is not clear at what level OPN may modulate PTH signaling. To address specifically the interaction of PTH and OPN in osteoblasts, we overexpressed the constitutively active PTH/PTHrP receptor mutant (H223R, caPPR) specifically in cells of the osteoblastic lineage in vivo in the absence of OPN.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Generation of OPN-deficient Col1a1-caPPR Transgenic Mice—OPN−/− mice in 129/(S1,S7) mixed background (19) and Col1a1-caPPR transgenic (PPR-tg) mice in FVB/N background were previously reported (23). For Col1a1-caPPR transgenic mice, a 2.3-kilobase fragment of the mouse Col1a1 promoter was ligated upstream to the entire coding region of human mutated Jansen type PTH/PTHrP receptor (HKrk-H223R, along with the cloning vector pcDNAI sequence that contains poly(A) signal. Generation of OPN-deficient Col1a1-caPPR transgenic mice was performed by crossing male hemizygous PPR-tg OPN+/− mice with female OPN+/− mice. Ten-week-old male littermates of four genotypes (PPR-wt/OPN-WT, PPR-wt/OPN-KO, PPR-tg/OPN-WT, PPR-tg/OPN-KO) were analyzed. All experiments were performed according to institutionally approved guidelines for animal welfare.
Three-dimensional Micro-CT Analysis of Bone—Imaging of distal metaphyses of the femora was performed using a micro-CT apparatus (Scan Xmate-E090, Comscan Techno Co. Kanagawa, Japan). Three-dimensional micro-CT images were analyzed and quantified using an automated image analyzer (TRI/3D-BON, Ratoc System Engineering Co. Tokyo, Japan). Trabecular bone mass was examined in an area with its closest and furthest edges at 0.25 and 2.00 mm, respectively, from the growth plate in the distal ends of the femora.
Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone—Calcein (1.6 mg/kg body weight) was injected intraperitoneally 9 and 2 days before sacrifice. Femora were embedded in methyl methacrylate, and 3-μm-thick sagittal sections of distal metaphyses and horizontal sections of midshaft regions were prepared. Calcein labeling was visualized using a confocal laser microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss) with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and a 550-nm band-pass filter. The dynamic histomorphometry was conducted in the secondary spongiosa (1.0 × 1.0 mm); the cortical bone compartment was excluded from the analysis. von Kossa staining and Masson-Goldner staining were conducted as described elsewhere. Tibiae were decalcified in 10% EDTA and embedded in paraffin, and 7-μm-thick sagittal serial sections of proximal metaphyses were prepared. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was used to quantify osteoclast number and osteoclast surface.
Serum Osteocalcin—Blood samples were collected at the time of sacrifice, and serum was separated. Serum osteocalcin levels were determined by using IRMA kit (Immutopics).
Urinary Deoxypyridinoline—Urine samples were individually collected in metabolic cages (Natsume) during the last 24 h before sacrifice. Urinary deoxypyridinoline levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DPD EIA kit, Metra Biosystems).
Transfection and Luciferase Assay—MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells were plated on 24-well plates at a density of 104 cells per well. Transfection of siRNA and plasmid DNA was performed on day 1 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). siRNA for OPN was manufactured by Ambion (Silencer Pre-designed siRNA, ID #150969 for mouse Spp1). Silencer Negative Control #1 siRNA was used as a control. Plasmid DNA containing human mutated PTH/PTHrP receptor (H223R) was previously described (25). pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) was used as a control. For reporter plasmids, pCRE-luc (PathDetect, Stratagene) reporter plasmid was used to measure cAMP-response element activity. Renilla luciferase reporter vector pGL4 (Promega) was used as an internal control. For transfection, each well received 0.2 μg of H223R plasmid DNA or control, 20 pmol of siRNA for OPN or control, 0.2 μg of pCRE-luc, and 40 ng of Renilla luciferase plasmid combined with 1.0 μl of Lipofectamine 2000. The luciferase assay was performed using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) 48 h after transfection (day 3). Luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer (Lumat LB 9507, Berthold Technologies).
Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis—Transfected cells were lysed 3 days after transfection in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). One microgram of total RNA was treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) before reverse transcription. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II transcriptase and oligo(dT)12–18 primers (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was carried out using an iCycler (Bio-Rad) and iQ5 data analyzing software. The reaction was performed in a 25-μl reaction mixture containing 2-μl cDNA samples, 1-μl sense and antisense primer mix (5 μm), and 12.5 μl of iQ SYBR Green Supermix. The primer sequences were designed based on a Beacon Designer (Bio-Rad) program. PCR conditions were 95 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s for 40–50 cycles.
Statistical Analysis—Results are expressed as the mean values ± S.D. Statistical evaluation was conducted based on analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference test after the Bartlett test. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Osteopontin Deficiency Enhances the Increase in Trabecular Bone Mass Induced by Osteoblast-specific Transgenic Expression of caPPR—Osteopontin deficiency by itself did not appreciably increase fractional trabecular bone volume (BV/TV), although there was a slight extension of the spongiosa into the diaphyseal area as reported previously (19) (Fig. 1a, PPR-wt/OPN-KO, #). Transgenic mice harboring the constitutively active mutant type of PTH/PTHrP receptor in osteoblastic cells (PPR-tg/OPN-WT) showed an increase in the trabecular bone in the adult mice, consistent with previous results (23). This increase was seen on three-dimensional micro-CT images as the presence of dense trabeculation in the epiphyseal regions of the distal end of the femur (Fig. 1a, PPR-tg/OPN-WT). Three-dimensional micro-CT images also revealed that transgenic expression of caPPR resulted in an extension of trabecular bone toward the diaphyseal regions, where the meshwork pattern of the trabecular bone was maintained (Fig. 1a, PPR-tg/OPN-WT, asterisk). These observations were comparable to those in mice treated with intermittent administration of PTH (23).
It has been reported that PPR-tg mice exhibit intense staining for osteopontin in trabecular bones, suggesting a role of OPN in this system (24). As shown in Fig. 1a (PPR-tg/OPN-KO), OPN-deficiency increased trabecular bone dramatically and resulted in a denser and finer meshwork patterning of the trabecular bone than that in PPR-tg mice (PPR-tg/OPN-WT). A dense trabecular bone patterning was observed not only in the epiphyseal region but also far into the diaphyseal region (Fig. 1a, PPR-tg/OPN-KO, §). The increase in fractional bone volume (three-dimensional BV/TV) due to caPPR expression in osteoblasts was significantly enhanced by osteopontin-deficiency (Fig. 1b). It was also observed that the increase in trabecular number (three-dimensional Tb.N) induced by caPPR was further enhanced by OPN-deficiency (Fig. 1c). Changes in trabecular thickness (Fig. 1d) and trabecular separation in PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice (Fig. 1e) were not significantly altered by the absence of OPN.
We also observed a slight trabeculation of the cortical bone in PPR-tg mice (Fig. 1a, open arrowhead). This trabeculation of the cortical bone was increased and extended in the absence of OPN (Fig. 1a, thin arrows). In addition, the tapering of the metaphyseal region of the femur was reduced by the absence of OPN in transgenic mice expressing caPPR (Fig. 1a, open arrow).
These observations were consistently obtained in eight independent sets of littermates. These observations suggest that OPN prevents excessive trabecular bone formation caused by caPPR overexpression in cells of the osteoblastic lineage.
The bone mineral density of PPR-tg/OPN-KO femora was significantly higher than that of PPR-wt/OPN-WT and PPR-wt/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 1f), and the entire medullary cavity of the PPR-tg/OPN-KO femora was filled with cancellous bone as shown by two-dimensional micro-CT cross-sectional images made at the middle of the femur (Fig. 1i). Furthermore, the effects of PPR-tg/OPN-KO genotype were not exclusive to the appendicular skeleton. Craniofacial flat bones (calvariae) and axial bones (lumbar vertebrae) exhibit phenotypic characteristics consistent with those apparent in the appendicular skeleton (femur) as shown by three-dimensional micro-CT images of the fourth lumbar vertebrae and the calvariae (Fig. 1, k and l).
Other phenotypic differences between the four mouse groups such as mobility, gait pattern, pain sensation, or any other noticeable manifestations were not obvious except for the slightly reduced body weight and smaller size in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 1g and data not shown). Accordingly, the bones tended to be slightly shorter in the double mutant mice (Fig. 1, h and j).
Osteopontin Deficiency Changes the Cellular Content of the Bone Marrow Space in the Presence of Osteoblast-specific Transgenic Expression of caPPR—Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tibiae from wild-type and osteopontin-deficient mice-expressing caPPR transgene indicated that osteopontin deficiency induced an alteration in the cellular composition in bone marrow. An increase in the number of mesenchymal cells was observed in the bone marrow spaces of PPR-tg mice, and this change was strongly enhanced by the absence of OPN (Fig. 2b). Hematopoietic cells, which are recognized by their high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (Fig. 2b), were reduced in number in the bones of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 2b, right panel), indicating that OPN deficiency changed the cellular content of the bone marrow space in these animals. It appeared that the bone marrow space in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice was occupied by predominantly mesenchymal cells.
Higher magnification images of the cells adjacent to the trabecular bones showed thick lining cells on the trabecular bone surface in PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice (Fig. 2b, open arrowhead) compared with thin lining cells in PPR-wt/OPN-WT or PPR-wt/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 2b, closed arrowheads). This alteration was further enhanced by the absence of OPN in the transgenic mice. To examine the nature of these stromal cells, we stained the sections for alkaline phosphatase activity. Compared with PPR-wt/OPN-WT or PPR-wt/OPN-KO, overexpression of caPPR under the control of Col1a1 promoter (PPR-tg/OPN-WT) resulted in strong staining for alkaline phosphatase activity in cells on the trabecular bone surface (Fig. 2c, red arrowheads). In these sections most of the alkaline phosphatase-positive cells were closely attached to the trabecular bone (Fig. 2c, PPR-tg/OPN-WT). In contrast to PPR transgenic mice, osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR (PPR-tg/OPN-KO) resulted in numerous alkaline phosphatase-positive cells within the intertrabecular space in the bone marrow (Fig. 2c, asterisks). Some of these cells were attached to the trabecular bone surface, whereas others were found inside the intertrabecular space. These data indicated that osteopontin deficiency in the presence of osteoblast-specific caPPR expression increased the number of alkaline phosphatase-positive osteoblastic cells to a level that almost fully occupied the intertrabecular space.
The trabecular bone filling the bone marrow space of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice was well mineralized, at least based on analysis using von Kossa staining (Fig. 2d). Osteoid, stained red in Masson-Goldner staining, was only marginally increased in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 2e). Therefore, although osteopontin deficiency increased bone mass in the trabecular bone in the transgenic mice, the calcification state of the bone was similar to that of PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice.
Despite the reduced marrow cavity, hematopoiesis was sustained in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice. Red blood cell counts, hemoglobin, and hematocrit in peripheral blood were equivalent between PPR-tg/OPN-WT and PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice, whereas white blood cell counts and platelet counts for PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice were higher than those of PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice (Fig. 2f).
Osteopontin Deficiency Further Enhances Bone Formation Activity Induced by Osteoblast-specific Transgenic Expression of caPPR—To address whether the absence of osteopontin affects bone formation in vivo in caPPR transgenic mice, we carried out histomorphometric analysis of the distal femora. Calcein injections yielded a consistent dual labeling in trabecular bone in PPR-wt/OPN-WT and PPR-wt/OPN-KO mice; this dual labeling was also observed in trabecular bone of PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice. However, in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice, the calcein labeling was uneven, possibly reflecting the crowded nature of the trabecular bone in these mice (Fig. 3a). Such an uneven pattern of calcein labeling is a characteristic feature of rapid cancellous bone formation. In wild-type bone, osteoblasts are laterally connected by several molecules including connexin, and many osteoblasts work in concert to form bone in a planar fashion, resulting in the even pattern of calcein labeling seen in histological sections. Possibly, this lateral connectivity is impaired in the event of enhanced bone formation. This uneven pattern of labeling is also observed in the case of rapid cancellous bone formation after fracture.
As noted previously, PPR-tg mice exhibited an increase in mineral apposition rate (Fig. 3, a and b). Osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR did not further enhance the mineral apposition rate (Fig. 3b). Analyses of mineralizing surface per area (MS) showed an increase in PPR-tg mice and osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR, further enhanced mineralizing surface per area (Fig. 3c). Bone surface per unit area (BS) was significantly increased in PPR-tg mice, and OPN deficiency in these mice further increased the bone surface per area by about 80% (Fig. 3d). Because BS was significantly higher in the double mutant mice (PPR-tg/OPN-KO), calculated values (MS normalized against BS) for MS/BS indicated a decrease in these animals (Fig. 3e). Similarly, bone formation rate normalized against the BS was somewhat reduced due to the large increase of the BS in the double mutant mice (PPR-tg/OPN-KO) (Fig. 3f). Total bone formation activities per unit area (1 mm2) of the bone were higher in the double mutant mice than in PPR-tg mice (Fig. 3g).
We further tested whether such elevated bone formation activities observed in histomorphometry (Fig. 3g) were reflected in biochemical parameters. Serum alkaline phosphatase activities were barely altered in PPR-tg mice. However, osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR significantly (about 3-fold) increased serum alkaline phosphatase levels compared with PPR-tg mice, reflecting the presence of high numbers of osteoblastic cells expressing alkaline phosphatase in the skeleton of these animals (Fig. 3h). Osteocalcin levels were increased in PPR-tg mice. Similarly, osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR significantly enhanced serum osteocalcin levels (Fig. 3i). These observations indicated that osteopontin deficiency further increased the number of cells producing these markers in caPPR transgenic mice, in which the levels of these markers were already higher than those of wild-type mice. Together, these results suggest that PTH signaling in bone-forming cells is under negative control of the bone matrix protein, osteopontin.
Additionally, mineralized nodule formation of bone marrow cells and MTT assays of osteoblastic cells obtained from calvarial outgrowth cultures were performed (Fig. 3, j and k). The results of these in vitro assays suggest that the contribution of cell-autonomous effects to the phenotype of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice is relatively minor.
Osteopontin Deficiency Further Enhances Bone Resorption Activity Induced by Osteoblast-specific Transgenic Expression of caPPR—It was shown previously that PPR-tg mice exhibited an elevation in bone formation as well as bone resorption, with the balance favoring bone formation. This results in the net increase in bone mass (23). We further asked whether the absence of osteopontin in the local milieu alters osteoclastic activity in the transgenic mice.
The number of osteoclasts per area (N.Oc) based on histomorphometric analysis was increased in PPR-tg mice as noted before (Fig. 4, a and b) (23). Because of the increase in bone surface per area, osteoclast number normalized against bone surface (N.Oc/BS) of PPR-tg mice was not altered compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 4c). N.Oc was further enhanced by osteopontin deficiency in the transgenic mice (Fig. 4, a and b). Despite a further increase in the bone surface per area in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice, osteoclast number normalized against bone surface (N.Oc/BS) was significantly increased in the double mutant mice (Fig. 4c), indicating that osteopontin deficiency enhanced osteoclast number per unit surface in the transgenic mice (Fig. 4c). Osteoclast surface per bone surface (OcS/BS) was not significantly increased in PPR-tg mice (Fig. 4d). Osteopontin deficiency tended to increase the levels of osteoclast surface per bone surface in the transgenic mice, although the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 4d, p = 0.056).
Despite the presence of elevated bone resorption activity, high bone mass was observed in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice. This is possibly due to an even higher bone formation activity in these mice (Fig. 3). In terms of PPR-tg single mutant mice, high bone mass, despite enhanced osteoclastic activity, has been attributed to even more enhanced osteoblastic activity (23).
To examine whether these morphological observation could be reflected in biochemical aspects, we measured urinary excretion levels of deoxypyridinoline. Transgenic mice expressing caPPR under Col1a1 promoter had increased levels of deoxypyridinoline excretion in the urine, as compared with control mice (Fig. 4e). Osteopontin deficiency in the presence of caPPR further increased urinary deoxypyridinoline excretion (Fig. 4e). These observations indicated that the presence of osteopontin suppressed the elevation of osteoclastic resorption activities caused by osteoblast-specific overexpression of constitutively active PTH/PTHrP receptor.
Additionally, bone marrow cells of the four genotypes were cultured, and TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were developed ex vivo to investigate osteoclast differentiation. TRAP-positive cell development was similar among the four genotypes (Fig. 4f), suggesting that the ability of osteoclast precursors to differentiate is similar in cells from both genotypes. Although we did not measure the actual resorptive activity levels of these osteoclast-like cell cultures, the presence of TRAP strongly suggests that these cells are osteoclasts.
Molecular Convergence of OPN Signaling and PPR Signaling on cAMP-response Element (CRE) Activities in Osteoblastic Cells—To address whether caPPR signaling inside the osteoblastic cell compartment is down-regulated by osteopontin, we utilized MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells that express high levels of OPN. OPN mRNA levels were significantly reduced in MC3T3-E1 cells treated with OPN siRNA compared with the cells treated with control siRNA (Fig. 5a). This suppression was observed regardless of the presence of caPPR (H223R) or control plasmid (Fig. 5a). In cotransfection experiments with a CRE-luciferase reporter, OPN siRNA did not affect luciferase activity significantly, whereas the forced expression of the H223R mutant form of PPR (caPPR) elevated luciferase activity about 30-fold. Suppression of OPN by siRNA further enhanced the luciferase activity up to 300-fold compared with control: i.e. 10-fold compared with the group where H223R plasmid and control siRNA were transfected (Fig. 5b). These observations indicated that at least one of the actions of OPN is to suppress the intracellular events triggered by the presence of constitutively active (H223R) PPR in osteoblastic cells.
DISCUSSION
Our discovery of OPN as a suppressor of the PTH signaling-induced increase in bone mass reveals more functional significance of this molecule. OPN shares some features with cytokines and has additional roles as an inhibitor of mineralization (19). In addition, OPN regulates signaling within osteoblastic cells, as caPPR-induced CRE-activities were enhanced by the reduction of OPN. Our data indicate that the effects of OPN-deficiency are, at least in part, due to the modulation of transcriptional events regulated by signaling downstream of PTH/ PTHrP receptor.
It is intriguing that PTH has been shown to increase the niche activity for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (26, 27) and that osteopontin has been reported as a suppressive component of HSC niche (24, 28). However, the mechanism of OPN action on HSCs and their niche has not been fully elucidated. Because osteoblastic cells are important components of the niche within the bone microenvironment, any reduction of osteoblastic function suppresses niche function (29). For instance, recent reports indicated that the sympathetic nervous system suppresses osteoblastic cells (30, 31), and this suppression of osteoblasts results in the down-regulation of the niche function for hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, releasing HSCs into the blood stream (29). The suppressive effects of OPN on bone formation discovered in our experiments could also be a part of the OPN functions that negatively regulate the hematopoietic stem cell niche. As noted before, the hematopoietic and bone systems share many components. OPN may be one of them, not only as a regulator of osteoblastic activities but also as a merging center for the signals from PTH and the HSC niche in the microenvironment.
For hematopoietic cells, OPN can either induce apoptosis or suppress proliferation (24, 28). The absence of OPN may increase HSC numbers in response to stimulation by the presence of PPR-tg/OPN-KO osteoblasts. For instance, administration of PTH to OPN-null mice induced an increase in HSCs as compared with wild-type mice (24). However, the PPR-tg/OPN-KO double mutant mice did not develop anemia. Rather, they showed a significant increase of white blood cells and platelets compared with PPR-tg/OPN-WT mice (Fig. 2f). Therefore, although the marrow cavity was reduced due to an increase in trabecular bone mass, hematopoiesis is sustained at least under our experimental conditions. Although not appreciable in the histological sections, certain levels of HSCs may still exist in the marrow environment of the double mutant mice. In fact, we observed that the number of osteoclasts was increased in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice (Fig. 4, a–c), suggesting that HSCs were not deficient in these mice.
We showed previously that signals generated by mechanical stress require OPN for bone formation (22). Because bone formation is affected by mechanical stress and mechanical stress promotes proper bone formation and coupling of bone remodeling, OPN may link the PTH axis and mechanical signaling in bone.
OPN is produced by several tissue sources in both insoluble (extracellular matrix-associated) and soluble forms. These forms of OPN are part of the microenvironment in bone. OPN binds to several types of receptors including integrins and variant forms of CD44 (32), and therefore, the absence of OPN may alter more than one signaling pathway. CD44 is a cell surface glycoprotein that serves as an adhesion molecule, and its isoforms exert diverse functions. OPN-CD44 signal facilitates cell motility (33) and survival (34). Additionally, OPN increases CD44 expression in RAW264.7 leukemia cells (35), and the absence of OPN decreases surface expression of CD44 (18). Reduced CD44 signaling may impair migration and survival of hematopoietic cells, and this may contribute in part to the bone phenotype in the double mutant mice.
OPN was also shown to suppress proliferation and differentiation in a certain type of osteoblastic cells (36). We observed that stromal cells occupied the narrowed bone marrow space in PPR-tg/OPN-KO double mutant mice (Fig. 2b). Therefore, it would be possible that the in vivo environment could allow an increase in stromal cells and/or osteogenic precursors in the absence of OPN in the transgenic mice. In fact, in vitro assays for nodule formation, MTT, and PCR analysis suggested that contribution of cell-autonomous effects in the cells taken from PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice were relatively minor (Fig. 3, j and k, and data not shown). Additionally, when bone marrow cells of the four genotypes were cultured and TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were developed ex vivo, TRAP-positive cell development was similar among the four genotypes (Fig. 4f). These in vitro results suggest that the changes seen in osteoblasts and osteoclasts in PPR-tg/OPN-KO bone might not be due to cell-autonomous mechanisms, and in vivo environmental cues may play a role in causing the phenomena observed in our experiments.
The appearance of the high levels of cancellous bone in the diaphysis of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice is similar to the early osteogenic phase observed after marrow ablation. This similarity is only at the early phase; in the marrow ablation model, the high turnover state in osteoblastic and osteoclastic remodeling phase in cancellous bone is transient, whereas that in the PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice is sustained and is not followed by the osteoclastic remodeling phase of the injury model.
Abundant TRAP-positive osteoclasts in the double mutant mice resulted in an increase in remodeling in two distinct compartments. Osteoclastic resorption in the cortical bone leads to a trabeculation of cortex, whereas osteoclastic resorption in the cancellous bone leads to an increase in eroded surfaces on trabecular bone (Fig. 4a), suggesting that the osteoclasts are not ineffective at resorbing bone. In fact, osteoclasts are effective in both cancellous and cortical bone. The net increase in bone mass of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice is not the reflection of osteoclast dysfunction but is due to the fact that high turnover state of the bone metabolism in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice is sustained, and the balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is in favor of the former. The increase in the urinary deoxypyridinoline levels gives biochemical support for the notion mentioned above (osteoclasts are effective) and coincides with the morphological observations of increase in eroded surface. The increase in serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin also supports the idea that high turnover state (with high levels of osteoblastic activities) is the predominant feature of bone in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice.
It was previously reported that Col1a1-caPPR delays the transition from bone to bone marrow during postnatal growth and the formation of marrow cavities (37). Considering that OPN knockdown enhanced transcriptional events downstream to PTH/PTHrP receptor (Fig. 5) in osteoblastic cells, it is possible that OPN deficiency further delayed the transition of bone to bone marrow in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice.
Trabeculation of cortical bone was observed in micro-CT images in PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice. Patients exhibiting primary hyperparathyroidism show similar structural characteristics. Therefore, this observation is significant and relevant along with the enormous increase in cancellous bone. However, the PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice did not develop spontaneous stress fractures in their long bones. High levels of bone mass and/or bone mineral density may compensate for the reduction in the strength of the bone in these mice.
Calvarial bones and the lumbar vertebrae were also analyzed based on three-dimensional micro-CT images and DEXA (Fig. 1, k and l, and supplemental Fig. 1). Calvarial bones recapitulated the cortical bone phenotype of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice in that they showed a higher porosity, whereas vertebral bones recapitulated the cancellous bone phenotype of PPR-tg/OPN-KO mice, showing a higher bone volume (supplemental Fig. 1). These observations suggest that appendicular, axial, and craniofacial bones were all affected in the double mutant mice.
Overall, we have shown that the action of the systemic hormone PTH is regulated by feedback systems locally in bone where the bone matrix protein osteopontin plays an important suppressive role. Our observation will give rise to a widened concept with respect to multiple layers of feedback regulation in the PTH axis. Such multiple layers of regulation would render the body system to be versatile to adapt various environmental conditions.
Footnotes
This work was supported by grants-in-aid received from the Japanese Ministry of Education (21st Century Center of Excellence Program, Molecular Destruction and Reconstitution of Tooth and Bone, Grants 18109011, 18659438, 18123456, and 20013014) and grants from the Japan Space Forum, NASDA, and the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS Core to Core Program). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are: PTH, parathyroid hormone; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone related peptide; PPR, PTH/PTHrP receptor; caPPR, constitutively active PPR; OPN, osteopontin; CRE, cyclic AMP-response element; micro-CT, micro-computed tomography; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; MS, mineralizing surface; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; siRNA, small interfering RNA; BV/TV, bone volume/tissue volume; MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide; MS, mineralizing surface; BS, bone surface; N.Oc, osteoclasts per area; WT, wild type; KO, knock out.
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental supplemental Figs. 1 and 2.
REFERENCES
- 1.Marx SJ. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1863–1875. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012213432508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bell NH. J Clin Investig. 1985;76:1–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI111930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeLuca HF. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:359–365. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197308162890710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Avioli LV, Haddad JG. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:47–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407053110109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosenblatt M. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1004–1013. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610163151606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schluter KD, Piper HM. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;37:34–41. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00194-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dempster DW, Cosman F, Parisien M, Shen V, Lindsay R. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:690–709. doi: 10.1210/edrv-14-6-690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hodsman AB, Bauer DC, Dempster DW, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, Kendler DL, McClung MR, Miller PD, Olszynski WP, Orwoll E, Yuen CK. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:688–703. doi: 10.1210/er.2004-0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang Y, Zhao JJ, Mitlak BH, Wang O, Genant HK, Eriksen EF. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1932–1941. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105103441904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosen CJ. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cinamon U, Turcotte RE. Bone (NY) 2006;39:420–423. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosen CJ, Bilezikian JP. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:957–964. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Black DM, Greenspan SL, Ensrud KE, Palermo L, McGowan JA, Lang TF, Garnero P, Bouxsein ML, Bilezikian JP, Rosen CJ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1207–1215. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vestergaard P, Jorgensen NR, Mosekilde L, Schwarz P. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:45–57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0204-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kitahara K, Ishijima M, Rittling SR, Tsuji K, Kurosawa H, Nifuji A, Denhardt DT, Noda M. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2132–2140. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Denhardt DT, Noda M. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 1998;30–31:92–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Denhardt DT, Noda M, O’Regan AW, Pavlin D, Berman JS. J Clin Investig. 2001;107:1055–1061. doi: 10.1172/JCI12980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rittling SR, Matsumoto HN, McKee MD, Nanci A, An XR, Novick KE, Kowalski AJ, Noda M, Denhardt DT. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:1101–1111. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ashkar S, Weber GF, Panoutsakopoulou V, Sanchirico ME, Jansson M, Zawaideh S, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Glimcher MJ, Cantor H. Science. 2000;287:860–864. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yoshitake H, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Noda M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8156–8160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ishijima M, Rittling SR, Yamashita T, Tsuji K, Kurosawa H, Nifuji A, Denhardt DT, Noda M. J Exp Med. 2001;193:399–404. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.3.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Calvi LM, Sims NA, Hunzelman JL, Knight MC, Giovannetti A, Saxton JM, Kronenberg HM, Baron R, Schipani E. J Clin Investig. 2001;107:277–286. doi: 10.1172/JCI11296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stier S, Ko Y, Forkert R, Lutz C, Neuhaus T, Grunewald E, Cheng T, Dombkowski D, Calvi LM, Rittling SR, Scadden DT. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1781–1791. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schipani E, Langman CB, Parfitt AM, Jensen GS, Kikuchi S, Kooh SW, Cole WG, Juppner H. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:708–714. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, Weber JM, Olson DP, Knight MC, Martin RP, Schipani E, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR, Milner LA, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adams GB, Martin RP, Alley IR, Chabner KT, Cohen KS, Calvi LM, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:238–243. doi: 10.1038/nbt1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nilsson SK, Johnston HM, Whitty GA, Williams B, Webb RJ, Denhardt DT, Bertoncello I, Bendall LJ, Simmons PJ, Haylock DN. Blood. 2005;106:1232–1239. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Katayama Y, Battista M, Kao WM, Hidalgo A, Peired AJ, Thomas SA, Frenette PS. Cell. 2006;124:407–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kondo H, Nifuji A, Takeda S, Ezura Y, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Nakashima K, Karsenty G, Noda M. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30192–30200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504179200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, Starbuck M, Yang X, Liu X, Kondo H, Richards WG, Bannon TW, Noda M, Clement K, Vaisse C, Karsenty G. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Katagiri YU, Sleeman J, Fujii H, Herrlich P, Hotta H, Tanaka K, Chikuma S, Yagita H, Okumura K, Murakami M, Saiki I, Chambers AF, Uede T. Cancer Res. 1999;59:219–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zohar R, Suzuki N, Suzuki K, Arora P, Glogauer M, McCulloch CA, Sodek J. J Cell Physiol. 2000;184:118–130. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200007)184:1<118::AID-JCP13>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin YH, Yang-Yen HF. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:46024–46030. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105132200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marroquin CE, Downey L, Guo H, Kuo PC. Immunol Lett. 2004;95:109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huang W, Carlsen B, Rudkin G, Berry M, Ishida K, Yamaguchi DT, Miller TA. Bone (NY) 2004;34:799–808. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kuznetsov SA, Riminucci M, Ziran N, Tsutsui TW, Corsi A, Calvi L, Kronenberg HM, Schipani E, Robey PG, Bianco P. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:1113–1122. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]