Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of foliar endophytic fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plant community structure in experimental microcosms containing an assemblage of five species of plants (Oenothera odorata, Plantago asiatica, Trifolium repens, Isodon japonicas and Aster yomena). Leaves of Sasa borealis, Potentilla fragarioides, and Viola mandshurica were collected in Chungbuk, Korea. Endophytic fungi were isolated from the surface sterilized leaves and identified to species level using molecular and morphological techniques. Four isolates of the endophytic fungi were inoculated to the leaves of host plants in the microcosms. Also, three species of AMF spores were extracted from pure cultures and the mixture of the three species inoculated to the roots of the plants. After four months of growth in a green house, effects of both symbiotic fungi on plant species diversity, community composition and productivity were examined. The plant species diversity showed significant differences with inoculation of the symbiotic fungi. Results indicate that AMF significantly affect plant productivity and plant community structure.
Keywords: Community structure, Endophytes, Mycorrhizas, Microcosm
Biological and non-biological factors affect the variety of the plant community and evolution of the species. Intra- and interspecific competition and mutualistic symbiosis such as mycorrhizas and endophytes are included in biological factors. The symbiotic relationships between fungi and plants are widely distributed and these relationships affect the structure and function of ecosystems (Grime et al., 1987; Kranz, 1990). Mycorrhizae and endophytes are representative symbiotic association of the plants and fungi (Clay, 1990).
Mycorrhizae provide benefits to both the fungi and the host plants involved (Smith and Read, 1997). It appears that most groups of higher plants are actually mycorrhizal and grow best under natural conditions when specific fungal partners are present in the soil. Elongation of hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) from roots to soil greatly increases a potential for the uptake of phosphorus, other nutrients and the absorption of water by the plants. AMF not only benefit host plants with increased growth, but also increase plant ability to withstand or overcome many harsh environmental conditions such as mineral toxicities and deficiencies, water stress, eroded and disturbed soils (Busses and Ellis, 1985; Gildon and Tinker 1981).
The endophytes are defined as a group of fungi which colonize in leaves and stems of plants but cause no symptoms of disease (Petrini, 1991). Endophytes restricted to grasses and sedges were found in groups of Hypocreales, Xylariales and other ascomycetous fungi (Siegel et al., 1987). Presence of the fungi is frequently often associated with the enhanced fitness of their host plants. These endophytes produce a variety of secondary products, notably alkaloid, which are believed to act as anti-feedants and metabolic inhibitors of insects, to increase drought resistance for their host, and to retard fungal infections (Carroll, 1992). The herbaceous plants infected with endophytes had a greater resistance to high temperature (Bouton et al., 1993; Cunningham et al., 1993; Marks and Clay, 1996). Some endophytes produce poisonous secondary metabolic products, and the products protect the plants from pathogens (Burpee and Bouton, 1993; Christensen, 1996).
The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of foliar endophytes and AMF on growth of host plants and community structure of plants.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and identification of endophytes
Healthy leaves of Capsicum annuum, Sasa borealis, Potentilla fragarioides and Viola mandshurica collected from an arable site and its surrounding field areas in Goesan-gun, Chungbuk, Korea (128° 1'E, 36° 46'N). Only green leaves without signs of insect or microbial injury were used for fungal isolation. Collected leaves were gently washed with ddH2O and cut with a sterile scalpel into a small piece (1 × 1 cm). The pieces were surface-sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite (5 min) and 70% ethyl alcohol (1 min). After surface sterilization, four pieces on 0.5% malt extract agar (MEA) medium and the medium was incubated in dark at 25℃ for four weeks. Fungal hyphae and structures from slide cultures were observed under a light microscope. The size of condia was measured and the shape was carefully described.
For molecular identification, total DNA of the fungi was extracted from cultures isolated from each plant using DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen Science, USA) and was amplified using PCR. The partial internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region including 5.8 s ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was amplified with a universal primer set, ITS1F and ITS4, for fungi (Gardes and Bruns, 1993). The thermal cycler was programmed for 1 cycle of 3 min at 94℃, and 30 cycles of 1 min at 94℃ denaturing, 1 min at 55℃ annealing and 1 min at 72℃ extension, and finally 1 cycle of 5 min at 72℃ for hold. Nucleotide sequences were determined using ABIPRISM 377 automated sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, USA). A sequence similarity search of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database was conducted using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm. Four species of endophytes, Glomerella sp., Xylaria sp. and two species of Pestalotiopsis (P. sp1 and P. sp2) were identified using morphological and molecular characteristics (Table 1).
Table 1.
Identification of endophytic fungi isolated from plants by sequences of rDNA ITS region for inoculums in this study

Extraction of AMF spores
Spores of four species of AMF, Acaulospora longula, Glomus mosseae and Archeospora leptotica were extracted from pure cultures using wet-sieving and sucrose density gradient centrifugation methods (Daniels and Skipper, 1982). The extracted spores were observed under light microscopes and identified based on their morphological characteristics such as color, shape, surface ornamentation, contents and wall structures of spores (Schenck and Perez, 1990). AM fungal spores were surface-sterilized for inoculation (Hildebrandt et al., 2002).
Composition of microcosm
Three treatments by types of fungal inoculum were designed in this study; AMF only, endophytes only, and combination AMF and endophytes. No inoculum on plants was included as control. For root inoculation with AMF, plastic pots (50(W) × 38(L) × 8(H) cm) were filled with the sterilized vermiculites and sands (1 : 1, v/v). Seeds of five plant species (Oenothera odorata, Plantago asiatica, Trifolium repens, Isodon japonicas and Aster yomena) were obtained from a commercial seed source (Seedkorea Co., LTD., Korea) and surface-sterilized with 20% sodium hypochlorite and 96% ethyl alcohol. Thirty seeds of each plant species were sawed together into a pot. A potting medium were mixed with four species of AMF spores, and 400 spores of each AMF species were contained in a pot. For leaf inoculation, newly emerged leaves of healthy plants were inoculated with mycelium of four species of endophytes by brushing without wounds. Root and leaf inoculation in a plant were done as described above. Each treatment was replicated four times at the same time. After four months of growth in a greenhouse, effects of both symbiotic fungi on species diversity, species composition, and productivity of plant community within the microcosm were examined. Dry weights of plants were measured after dehydration in a drying oven at 70℃ for 48 hours. Shannon-Wiener index of species diversity (H') was calculated for plant community analysis (Magurran, 1988). All data was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using statistical package SPSS-WIN. The mean values were compared by Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD, P < 0.05).
Results
Experimental microcosms contained an assemblage of five species of plants treated with AMF and endophytes were set up in a greenhouse. After four months of growth, effects of the fungi on plant productivity were examined. The responses of plant growth to each treatment showed variation among plant species (Table 2). Growth of O. odorata, P. asiatica, I. japonicus and A. yomena in the community inoculated with AMF was significantly increased compared to controls, while no significant growth effect of AMF was detected in T. repens. Also, microsms inoculated with both symbiotic fungi, the growth of O. odorata, P. asiatica, I. japonicus and A. yomena was significantly increased compared to controls. However, in the communities inoculated with endophytes, a significant increase of dry weights was observed only in P. asiatica and I. japonicas.
Table 2.
Dry weights (standard error) of plant species and relative of abundance (RA) in plant communities inoculated with AM fungi and endophytes

*Different letters indicate significant difference among fungal treatments within plant species at P < 0.05.
In plants with AMF, mean biomass of all 5 plant species were significantly higher than biomass of control for each plant species, indicating positive mycorrhizal responsive (MR, Table 3). MR showed significant variation among plant species; highest in P. asiatica and lowest in A. yomena.
Table 3.
The responses of plant growth inoculated with symbiotic fungi after four months

*MR: Mycorrhizal response (%) = [(mean biomass mycorrhizal plant - mean biomass nonmycorrhizal plant)/mean biomass mycorrhizal plant] × 100.
**P values were determined by two-sample t-test using mean biomass of inoculated plants and uninoculated control.
The total biomass of plants in a microcosm was significantly higher in communities with AMF or with both symbiotic fungi than control (Table 2). However, a significant increase of growth was not observed in the microcosms inoculated with endophytes.
The species diversity index (H') was significantly increased in the plant community inoculated with symbiotic fungi (Fig. 1). The number of species in the microcosm was not changed during the period of this study, but relative abundances of each species consisting of a community were changed (Table 2). There was a positive correlation between species diversity and total dry weight of plants per microcosm (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
The species diversity indices of plant communities inoculated with the symbiotic fungi. Different letters above each bar indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. AMF: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Fig. 2.
Correlation between species diversity and total dry weight of plant community in a microcosm. Circle: control, Square: AM fungi, Triangle: endophytic fungi, Cross: AM fungi and endophytes.
Discussion
Many plants have symbiotic relationships with AMF in roots and with endophytes in shoots. These relationships affect plant growth and competitive ability of the host plants. However, influence of AMF and endophytes to host plants is not fully understood yet. In this study, the effects of foliar endophytes and AMF on plant community in experimental microcosms containing an assemblage of five species of plants were investigated. The results in this study showed that AMF and endophytes affect growth of host plants and plant community structure.
AMF can influence structure of the plant community through various ways. For example, the nutrition and inter-specific relationships of plants were affected by microbes of root systems (Stanton, 1988) and therefore composition of the plant community was affected by mycorrhizas (Allen and Allen, 1984; Bever, 1994). Nutrients flowing through the hyphal connection plant to plant affect both growth and competition ability of plants resulted in influence of the species composition in plant community. Also, studies were reported that host plant species differed in their dependency on AMF (Hetrick et al., 1996; Streitwolf-Engel et al., 1997; van der Heijden et al., 1998) as in this study (Table 3) showing variation among the plant species in mycorrhizal response of each plant species. The differences can affect to competitive abilities of the plant community.
AMF increased species diversity by increasing species evenness of the plant community. Although AMF increased the growth of all plants in the community, they could influence relative abundance of each species in the community due to the interspecific variation of response to the mycorrhizas. As a result, in this study, AMF would contribute to raise the species evenness of plant community. Mycorrhizal symbiosis can strongly influence the patterns and intensity of both intraspecific density effects and interspecific competition of plants (Grime et al., 1987; Hartnett et al., 1993). Mycorrhizas were played a vital role in the maintenance of biological diversity on the plant community.
A significant increase was not observed in the productivity of the community with endophytes in this study. However, relative abundance of plant species in the communities inoculated with endophytes was changed and the species evenness of plant community was increased with inoculation of endophytes, indicating endophytes increased species diversity of plant community through increasing species evenness. In this study, endophytes changed the relative abundance by increasing growth of two species, P. asiatica and I. japonicus, in the community and the endophytes infected to these plants could promote resistance of the host plants to various environmental stresses (West et al., 1993). It has been observed that plants infected with the endophytic fungi had greater resistance to the drought and high temperatures (Marks and Clay, 1996). The increased resistance to the environmental stresses with infection of endophytes could raise inter-specific competitive ability of the plants and these factors could influence the composition of plant community (Hill et al., 1991; Marks et al., 1991).
The community treated with both symbiotic fungi showed significant differences in growth responses of plant in the community from the community with only AMF and endophytes, respectively. The biomass of P. asiatica in the community treated with both symbiotic fungi was lower than when treating only AMF, suggesting that the endophytes could negatively influence AMF of P. asiatica. If plants were infected with endophytes, the movement of photosynthetic products toward a root could be limited, and it would be possible to affect growth of AMF (Clay, 1992). Also, toxic metabolites produced by endophytes may inhibit colonization of mycorrhizal fungi.
In this study, the plant species diversity and the total dry weight of plants showed a significant positive correlation. These results were supported by preceding studies showing that the productivity in the plant community was increased with the increased plant diversity (van der Heijden et al., 1998). Results of this study indicate that both symbiotic fungi may significantly affect the plant community structure. The interactions between the symbiotic fungi and host plants might increase the species diversity and plant productivity. The result of study would increase the scope of understanding with respect to the role of symbiotic fungi on the plant community.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund) (KRF-2005-003-C00161).
References
- 1.Allen EB, Allen MF. Competition between plants of different successional stages: mycorrhizae as regulators. Can J Bot. 1984;62:2625–2629. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bever JD. Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology. 1994;75:1965–1977. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bouton JH, Gates RN, Belesky DP, Owsley M. Yield and persistence of tall fescue in the southeastern coastal plain after removal of its endophyte. Agron J. 1993;85:52–55. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burpee LL, Bouton JH. Effect of eradication of the endophyte Acremonium coenophialum on epidemics of Rhizoctonia blight in tall fescue. Plant Disease. 1993;77:157–159. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Busse MD, Ellis JR. Vesicular-arbuscular mycirrhizal (Glomus fasciculatum) influence on soybean drought tolerance in high phosphorus soil. Can J Bot. 1985;63:2290–2294. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carroll GC. Fungal mutualism. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT, editors. The fungal community. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. pp. 327–354. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Christensen MJ. Antifungal activity in grasses infected with Acremonium and Epichloe endophytes. Aust Plant Pathol. 1996;25:186–191. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clay K. Fungal endophytes of grasses. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1990;21:275–297. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clay K. Mycophyllas and mycorrhizas: Comparison and contrast. In: Read DJ, Lewis DH, Fitter AH, Alexander IJ, editors. Mycorrhizas in ecosystem. UK: CABI; 1992. pp. 13–25. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cunningham PJ, Foot JZ, Reed KFM. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) endophyte (Acremonium lolii) relationships: The Austrian experience. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1993;44:157–168. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Daniels BA, Skipper HA. Methods for the recovery and quantitative estimation of propagules from soil. In: Schenck NC, editor. Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. St. Paul, Minn: Am Phytopathol Soc; 1982. pp. 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gildon A, Tinker PB. A heavy metal tolerance strain of a mycorrhizal fungus. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1981;77:648–649. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ. Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature. 1987;328:420–422. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hanlin RT. Illustrated genera of ascomycetes. St. Paul, Minn: Am Phytopathol Soc; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hartnett DC, Hetrick BA, Wilson GWT, Gibson DJ. Mycorrhizal influence of intra- and interspecific neighbor interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses. J Ecol. 1993;81:787–795. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hetrick BAD, Kitt DG, Wilson GWT. Mycorrhizal response in wheat cultivars: relationship to phosphorus. Can J Bot. 1996;74:19–25. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hildebrandt U, Janetta K, Bothe H. Towards growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi independent of a plant host. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1919–1924. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1919-1924.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hill NS, Belesky DP, Stringer WC. Competitiveness of tall fescue and influenced by Acremonium coenophialum. Crop Science. 1991;31:185–190. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kranz J. Fungal diseases in multispecies plant communities. New Phytol. 1990;116:383–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marks S, Clay K. Physiological responses of Festuca arundinacea to fungal endophyte infection. New Phytol. 1996;133:727–733. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marks S, Clay K, Cheplick GP. Effects of fungal endophytes on interspecific and intraspecific competition in the grasses Festuca arundinacea and Lolium perenne. J Appl Ecol. 1991;28:194–204. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Newman EI. Mycorrhizal links between plants: their functioning and ecological significance. Adv Ecol Res. 1988;18:243–270. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Petrini O. Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In: Andrews JH, Monano SS, editors. Microbial ecology of leaves. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991. pp. 179–197. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schenck NC, Perez Y. Manual for the identification of VA mycorrhizal fungi. 3rd ed. Gainesville, Florida: Synergistic Publications; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Siegel MR, Latch GCM, Johnson MC. Fungal endophytes of grasses. Annu Rev Phytopath. 1987;25:293–315. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stanton NL. The underground in grasslands. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1988;19:537–589. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. Clonal growth traits of two Prunella species are determined by co-occurring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from a calcareous grassland. J Ecol. 1997;85:181–191. [Google Scholar]
- 31.van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Steitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sander IR. Mycorrhizal fungi diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature. 1998;396:69–72. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wardle DA, Nicholson KS. Synergistic effects of grassland plant species on soil microbial biomass and activity: implications for ecosystem-level effects of enriched plant diversity. Func Ecol. 1996;10:410–416. [Google Scholar]
- 33.West CP, Izekor E, Turner KE, Elmi AA. Endophyte effects on growth and persistence of tall fescue along a water-supply gradient. Agron J. 1993;85:264–270. [Google Scholar]


