Skip to main content
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism logoLink to Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
. 2013 Jun 12;33(9):1355–1361. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.102

Cerebral ischemic stroke: is gender important?

Claire L Gibson 1,*
PMCID: PMC3764377  PMID: 23756694

Abstract

Cerebral stroke continues to be a major cause of death and the leading cause of long-term disability in developed countries. Evidence reviewed here suggests that gender influences various aspects of the clinical spectrum of ischemic stroke, in terms of influencing how a patients present with ischemic stroke through to how they respond to treatment. In addition, this review focuses on discussing the various pathologic mechanisms of ischemic stroke that may differ according to gender and compares how intrinsic and hormonal mechanisms may account for such gender differences. All clinical trials to date investigating putative neuroprotective treatments for ischemic stroke have failed, and it may be that our understanding of the injury cascade initiated after ischemic injury is incomplete. Revealing aspects of the pathophysiological consequences of ischemic stroke that are gender specific may enable gender relevant and effective neuroprotective strategies to be identified. Thus, it is possible to conclude that gender does, in fact, have an important role in ischemic stroke and must be factored into experimental and clinical investigations of ischemic stroke.

Keywords: acute stroke, brain ischemia, gender, neuroprotection, steroids

Introduction

Cerebral stroke is a leading cause of death and the main cause of adult long-term disability in developed countries. The majority (∼85%) of cerebral strokes are ischemic in nature and result from the occlusion of a major cerebral artery by a thrombus or an embolism, which leads to loss of blood flow and subsequent tissue death in the affected region. There is an increasing recognition of differences between men and women in relation to stroke, not only in terms of stroke risk but also in terms of influencing the etiology, symptoms, and outcomes. Women appear to have a higher overall lifetime risk of stroke in addition to higher rates of poststroke mortality, disability, depression, and dementia, compared with men. Such gender differences have largely been attributed to the longer life expectancy of women, consistent with the fact that age is the strongest independent risk factor for stroke1 and also a negative predictor for clinical outcome.2 Such a detrimental impact of age upon stroke risk and outcome, initially observed in white populations, has been consistently reported across studies involving participants of varying race and ethnicity.3

In the general population, men have been found to experience more ischemic strokes4, 5, 6 whereas women tend to have more infarctions involving the anterior circulation and experience more subarachnoid hemorrhages.5, 7 In terms of stroke onset, women tend to be, on average, approximately 4 years older than men at the age of ischemic stroke onset. A recent meta-analysis on data from 2,566 patients revealed that the mean age of onset of first ischemic stroke was 66.6 years in men compared with 70.0 years in women.8 As age is a significant risk factor and predictor of outcome after ischemic stroke, it is reported that elderly women carry the major burden associated with ischemic stroke.9 However, it is reported that in the premenopausal years, women benefit from a native cerebrovascular protection provided by reproductive hormones. For example, The Framingham study reported that the incidence of ischemic stroke is lower in women than men within the 45- to 54-year-old age cohort, composed mainly of premenopausal and preimenopausal women, but is equalized in the 55- to 64-year-old cohort.10 However, non-hormonal factors also contribute to the sexual dimorphic risk of ischemic stroke as gender differences not only extend well beyond the menopausal years but are also clearly present in neonatal and childhood populations where circulating hormones are equivalent between the sexes.11, 12 Interestingly, although some studies do report a higher incidence of stroke recurrence in females compared with males13 it seems that actually, after comparing for age, medical history, and other relevant risk factors, no gender differences are observed in stroke recurrence.14

Gender may also influence both the mechanisms of injury and outcome after ischemic stroke and thus, gender should be considered in both experimental and clinical stroke studies. There is an urgent need for the development of effective pharmacological therapies to counter the deleterious effects of ischemic stroke. The only current treatment available is thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator, but because of its narrow therapeutic window (<4.5 hours) and safety concerns, less than 5% of stroke patients receive tissue plasminogen activator and the majority of stroke patients only receive supportive care.15 The development of safe and effective treatments is, therefore, a major challenge to experimental and clinical stroke research. This review discusses the various aspects of ischemic stroke (risk, symptoms, outcome, etc.), which are beginning to emerge as being sexually dimorphic. In addition, it is discussed how knowledge of the influence of gender on the pathologic mechanisms after ischemic stroke may reveal potential treatment targets.

Gender Influences the Clinical Characteristics Associated with Ischemic Stroke

Important modifiable risk factors for ischemic stroke include hypertension, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, cigarette smoking, obesity, and lack of physical activity.16, 17, 18, 19 Data on sex-specific risk factors in ischemic stroke have initially revealed that men report a higher prevalence of current smoking, history of smoking, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease.20, 21, 22 Such variations in risk factors, according to gender, were also confirmed by others23 who reported that although women diagnosed with ischemic stroke were older than men, the history of hyperlipidemia, smoking, and coronary heart disease were less frequent. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that women with stroke are more likely than men to have a parental history of stroke, which is accounted for by an excess maternal history of stroke.24 Such a finding could be explained by sex-specific genetic, epigenetic, or non-genetic mechanisms.

It is also important to consider whether gender differences occur in the clinical presentation of a patient experiencing an ischemic stroke, as this may impact upon the prompt recognition, diagnostic testing, and receipt of appropriate treatment. In general terms, the symptoms of ischemic stroke can be separated into classic symptoms, which include hemibody numbness, hemiparesis, aphasia, dysarthria, visual disturbance, diplopia, facial weakness, discoordination/ataxia, and vertigo, and non-specific to stroke symptoms including pain, light headedness, mental status change, headache, and other neurologic or non-neurologic symptoms. Data on gender differences in acute stroke presentation are somewhat limited and few population-based studies exist. However, some studies report that women present with more non-specific stroke symptoms such as pain or altered mental status8, 25, 26, 27 whereas others report that women are as likely as men to report weakness and clumsiness, as well as both classic and non-specific symptoms that include pain, disorientation, and altered consciousness.28 In one of the few population-based studies, men were found to be more likely to present with classic focal neurologic symptoms such as sensory abnormalities, ataxia, and diplopia whereas women tended to present with diffuse symptoms such as disorientation, generalized weakness, fatigue, and mental status change.29 However, it is reported that women delay up to three times longer than men in seeking care for stroke symptoms,30 which of course may contribute to variations in the presentation of symptoms.

If women do clinically present differently with ischemic stroke than men, then there may be significant public health implications. Recognition of potential gender differences in stroke symptoms through education aimed at both the public and health care professionals could result in decreased out-of-hospital and in-hospital delays, thus increasing access to acute stroke therapy in women. Many public health campaigns, for example ‘Give me 5'in the United States and ‘FAST' in the United Kingdom, are aimed primarily at targeting the classic symptoms of ischemic stroke.31 It may be that public health campaigns and stroke intervention efforts should be modified to address the possibility that women, experiencing an ischemic stroke, may experience a number of non-specific symptoms. However, in the first instance, data from a large multicenter trial could determine whether gender differences in presentation of symptoms occur across a representative population of stroke cases and importantly, whether differences in symptom presentation have any clinical consequences.

Gender Effects on Outcome After Ischemic Stroke

Numerous studies report gender differences in both mortality and morbidity after ischemic stroke. Typically, female stroke patients present at an older age than male stroke patients thus, older female patients are likely to comprise the majority of stroke-related mortality and disability.3, 32 Data on gender differences in mortality rates after ischemic stroke are conflicting with some reporting higher in-hospital mortality rates in women,33 whereas others report no gender differences in mortality rates both in-hospital5 and at 3 months after ischemic stroke.4

However, the general consensus seems to be that women have poorer functional outcomes, than men, after ischemic stroke.5, 33, 34 Such a gender difference appears to be sustained even after making adjustments for age and other sex differences in medical history and presentation. In fact, one study34 found that at 6 months poststroke, female sex is still an independent predictor of poor prognosis even when adjusting for other predictors of functional outcome. Others have reported that at 3 months poststroke, women are more likely to have a poorer functional outcome4 and, in addition, women show significantly worse locomotor function than men at both 1- and 5-year-follow-up after ischemic stroke.14 After ischemic stroke, women are less likely to be discharged home35 and more likely to have impairments and activity limitations on followup.5 It is reported that poststroke women experience more mental impairment,35 depression,36 fatigue,37 and have a lower overall quality of life38, 39, 40 than men. It may be though that if women are more likely to delay in seeking care for stroke symptoms,30 this could result in treatment delays, which would contribute to worse outcomes. However, it needs also to be considered whether gender influences the treatment a patient receives both during and after the diagnosis of ischemic stroke.

Gender Effects on the Treatment Received and Response to Treatment

During diagnosis of ischemic stroke, several studies report gender differences in the use of echocardiography, carotid imaging, and endarterectomy.2, 41, 42 In addition, data from different national registers indicate that women are less likely to be seen by a stroke team or have their lipids investigated.5, 43 In terms of in-hospital treatment, the use of antiplatelet drugs and statins is reported to be lower among women than men and some report that women are less likely to receive thrombolytic treatment.6, 43 However, it must be noted that any differences in treatment may be as a direct consequence of sex differences in symptoms at presentation.

In addition to influencing the treatment a patient may actually receive, gender probably also influences the response to certain pharmacological treatments. Such a notion is largely overlooked in experimental stroke studies (discussed below) and only a few clinical trials to date have specifically investigated whether sex-specific responses to treatment exist. The Physicians Health Study found that aspirin substantially reduced the risk of cardiovascular disease, but not stroke, in men.44 By contrast, in the Women's Health Study, aspirin reduced the risk of stroke by 24% but had no effect on cardiovascular disease in women.45, 46 A subsequent sex-specific meta-analysis confirmed the differential effects of aspirin in men and women with respect to stroke and coronary artery disease risk.44 Oral anticoagulation with warfarin also seems to be affected by gender as shown in a prospective study of atrial fibrillation patients.47 In that study, men and women were anticoagulated to equal degrees but anticoagulated women had a relative risk of 2.0 for ischemic stroke versus anticoagulated men, even after age correction. Biologic sex may also affect the response to thrombolytic therapy as, after stroke, women have worse functional outcomes compared with men yet several studies have demonstrated an absence of sex differences in functional outcome after acute thrombolytic therapy.48, 49, 50 This normalization of baseline differences in functional outcome suggests that women may experience a greater benefit from tissue plasminogen activator than men.49 Thus, gender differences do seem to exist across many clinical aspects of ischemic stroke from affecting how the patient may present in the clinic through to how they may respond to a treatment. Although the current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines for acute stroke treatment51 make no distinction between genders in terms of presentation of symptoms or possible therapeutic approaches. However, the influence of gender is often overlooked in the design of experimental stroke studies and the investigation of the pathologic mechanisms influenced by gender may inform the design of potential treatment strategies.

The Impact of Gender—Intrinsic Versus Hormonal Mechanisms

Although it would appear that many aspects of ischemic stroke are sexually dimorphic, it is relevant to consider the reasons behind such dimorphism. Differences according to biologic sex may be due to intrinsic factors, i.e., the sex chromosomes, which are consistent throughout the lifespan, or caused by sex steroid hormones, which vary between the genders and fluctuate at various stages of the lifespan. The influence of biologic sex has both organizational, i.e., occurs at a particular period, for example during development, and persists even after the hormonal exposure is removed, and activational effects, which are reversible and persist only while the influencing sex steroid hormone is present. As discussed below, gender differences in the outcome after ischemic stroke can be explained by both hormone-independent and hormone-dependent mechanisms (reviewed also elsewhere52, 53).

Intrinsic Mechanisms

Aside from adult males experiencing a higher incidence of ischemic stroke, this ‘male sensitivity' to ischemic stroke can also be observed in childhood populations (for example, see references 11,12). As levels of steroid hormones are low in childhood populations, this suggests that other factors, i.e,. non-hormonal, have a role in mediating this sensitivity to ischemic stroke in males. Emerging evidence suggests that the sexually dimorphic response seen to ischemic stroke is partly due to the genetic complement of cells. Sex-specific cultures, in terms of both hippocampal neurons54, 55 and astrocytes56, 57 have shown that male-derived cells are more sensitive to ischemic injury than female-derived cells. Such cells are derived from neonatal populations and cultured in the absence of hormonal influences thus, confirming that intrinsic cell differences exist between males and females. In addition, several molecular mechanisms of injury, not linked to sexual development or function, have been shown to act dimorphically under ischemic conditions including nitric oxide synthase,58 poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP),59 and caspases.60, 61 However, the role of sex-specific hormones must also be considered, as revealing their role in determining the effects of ischemic stroke has also identified potential neuroprotective candidates for ischemic stroke treatment.

Biologic Mechanisms

Experimental studies, using both in vitro and in vivo approaches, support the notion that gender differences influence the outcome after induction of ischemic conditions.6 The increased occurrence of ischemic stroke in males has been identified in studies using spontaneously hypertensive, genetically stroke-prone rats.62 It is also well established that female rodents sustain less injury than males after experimental stroke.63, 64, 65, 66 The overall neuroprotective effect of female gender on ischemic stroke injury is evident even in the presence of specific stroke risk factors such as diabetes67 and hypertension.63 Such a neuroprotective effect of female gender is abolished by ovariectomy and reproductive senescence, which both cause a decline in the circulating levels of the sex steroid hormones, estrogen and progesterone.63, 68 In fact, experimental work has revealed that both estrogens and progesterone are potential neuroprotective factors after ischemic stroke (reviewed elsewhere69, 70). However, clinical trials examining the utility of estrogens as an intervention treatment after ischemic stroke have failed to show positive results71, 72 and no clinical trials, to date, have been designed to specifically examine the role of progesterone after ischemic stroke.

Sociocultural Factors

In recent years, a considerable amount of attention has been focused on the importance of considering social and cultural factors when considering differences in stroke epidemiology. For example, although it is often stated that men are at overall higher risk of ischemic stroke than females, a recent meta-analysis reported that there was a significantly larger male predominance in studies from Australasia and the Americas compared with studies from Europe.29 However, that same review highlighted the fact that the distribution of contributing studies to such meta-analyses is uneven with regions such as Africa, Asia, and South America being underrepresented. Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke incidence and outcome are well documented with, for example, age-adjusted stroke hospitalization rates for blacks being over three times higher than for whites.73 In terms of social factors, a number of studies have shown that the incidence of ischemic stroke increases with lower socioeconomic status in both men and women.74, 75 Although, interestingly, adjustment for a variety of classic lifestyle and psychosocial risk factors did not alter the impact of socioeconomic status on stroke risk in men whereas some attenuation of socioeconomic differential was seen after adjustment for risk factors in women.76

Mechanisms of Injury may Differ According to Gender

Cerebral ischemia triggers a cascade of pathologic events including excitotoxicity, cell necrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, blood–brain barrier breakdown etc., which ultimately culminate in cellular dysfunction and death. Although much progress has been made in dissecting the molecular pathways of pathologic processes such as excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis after ischemic stroke, this has largely failed to translate into effective therapies. However, emerging evidence suggests that gender differences occur in certain aspects of the pathologic cascade, induced after cerebral ischemia, including molecular pathways activated, which culminate in cell death and various aspects of the peripheral and brain inflammatory response (reviewed elsewhere77) although gender (and age) are largely overlooked in the design of experimental studies.

Ischemic cell death is triggered by an influx of calcium, with subsequent oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction activating several distinct cell death pathways.78 The immediate energy failure seen in the ischemic core leads to swelling of the mitochondria and loss of membrane integrity, typical of necrotic cell death. Reducing necrotic cell death is extremely difficult and likely requires reperfusion during the ischemic insult. However, a delayed apoptotic cell death also occurs in the penumbral region of the ischemic brain. Over the past decade, both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell-death pathways have been recognized, adding considerable complexity to studies of ischemic cell death.79 Although cell death and apoptosis occur after ischemic injury, it is relevant to consider that the mechanism of injury between the genders could differ. Previous studies have shown that ischemic cell death pathways are different in the male and female brains, females often showing caspase-mediated cell death of individual neurons, whereas males are more sensitive to caspase-independent cell death.77

Apoptotic pathology involves at least two signaling cascades, one initiated through intrinsic, mitochondria-mediated mechanisms involving cytochrome C release, apoptosome assembly, and caspase cleavage, and hence is known as a ‘caspase-dependent' pathway. An alternative caspase-independent pathway is triggered by postischemic DNA damage and involves the activation of PARP, release of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) from the mitochondria, and translocation of AIF to the nucleus to induce chromatin condensation and large scale DNA fragmentation. Both pathways of apoptosis involve multiple molecular signals, and there are numerous examples of such molecules that have sexually dimorphic roles in cerebral ischemic injury (see Table 1) including; AIF,80 caspase 3,60, 80 PARP,55 nitric oxide synthase,81 glutathione,82 Akt,83 astrocytic aromatase,57 glial fibrillary acidic protein,84 angiotensin II type 2 receptor,85 and the P450 enzyme, soluble epoxide hydrolase.86

Table 1. Molecular components of cell death pathways, which are proposed to show sexually dimorphic patterns of expression and/or function.

Molecule Biologic function in relation to cell death/survival
AIF80 Triggers DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation
Caspase 360, 80 Has a central role in the execution of apoptosis after ischemia
PARP55 DNA repair enzyme
Nitric oxide synthase81 May produce toxic levels of nitric oxide under ischemic conditions
Glutathione82 Involved in DNA synthesis and repair
Akt83 Phosphorylation of a variety of proteins (e.g., BAD) associated with apoptosis
Astrocytic aromatase57 Induced after ischemic injury and contributes to tissue damage
GFAP84 Intermediate filament protein, which maintains astrocyte integrity
Angiotensin II type 2 receptor85 Mediates neuronal apoptosis
P450 enzyme86 Under ischemic conditions, can produce reactive oxygen species resulting in oxidative stress and cell death

AIF, apoptosis-inducing factors; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; PARP, poly-ADP ribose polymerase.

The DNA repair enzyme PARP-1 induces caspase-independent apoptotic cell death via neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), PARP-1, and AIF, which all appear to have a key role in regulating cell death in the male brain. For example, although neuronal nitric oxide synthase deletion and inhibition results in neuroprotection in adult male mice, such genetic and pharmacological manipulations of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity actually exacerbate stroke damage in adult female mice.58 Such a sexually dimorphic response is not affected by hormone exposure and/or replacement suggesting it is either hormone-independent (a sex-specific effect) or secondary to organizational or epigenetic factors induced by early gonadal steroid exposure. In addition, PARP-1 gene deletion is protective in male pups exposed to hypoxic injury but has no effect in female pups.59 In adults, females sustain greater damage when PARP-1 is absent through genetic deletion or inhibited pharmacologically suggesting that activational effects or again female gender itself amplify these sex differences. Although Yuan et al87 demonstrated that, in fact, equivalent activation of the PARP pathway occurs in both sexes after ischemia, the detrimental effects of this pathway seem to be only present in males. Importantly, it appears that AIF translocation and PARP formation do not mediate ischemic injury in the female brain, therefore agents designed to reduce PARP-1 activation, such as minocycline, are unlikely to benefit females.88

A novel cell-death pathway, autophagy, has also been recently implicated in the pathology occurring after ischemic stroke and appears to differ according to gender. Autophagy involves engulfing segments of the cell's cytoplasm into an autophagosome destined for degradation by the lysosome allowing for recycling of cellular contents.89 Autophagic cell death occurs after neonatal hypoxic injury in male animals as shown by increases in autophagosome formation and lysosome activity. Inhibitors of autophagy are protective in models of neonatal hypoxic injury but seem to preferentially protect male-derived neuronal populations rather than female-derived ones.90

It is widely accepted that inflammation has a key role in contributing to the ensuing damage after ischemic stroke. It has been reported that young female rodents exhibit a decreased inflammatory response to ischemic injury compared with males and a considerable body of evidence strongly implicates estrogens as a significant regulator of inflammatory pathways.4, 91 Gene expression changes in the blood are a reflection of the immune response and a consequence of both environmental and genetic factors. Interestingly, Tian et al92 found gender-associated changes of gene expression in whole blood of humans after ischemic stroke at the whole-genome level. Although this does not inform as to whether these changes represent a cause or an effect of the stroke, it does provide evidence that gender-specific changes in gene expression occur after ischemic stroke. Such gender differences in ischemic stroke may reflect differences in the immune system, inflammatory responses, and cell death between the different genders after ischemic stroke. In addition, because women with Turner syndrome experience an almost three-fold higher risk of cerebrovascular diseases than XX women, it has been suggested that the dosage of X chromosome may be influential in ischemic stroke.93 However, experimental studies report that the number of X chromosomes does not have a significant impact on infarct damage after cerebral ischemia.94

In terms of the pathology produced after cerebral ischemia, attention has traditionally focused on damage to the gray matter, although cerebral white matter is highly vulnerable to the effects of focal ischemia.95 Pathologic changes in oligodendrocytes and myelinated axons occur early after the onset of ischemia and seems to be concomitant with, but independent of, neuronal perikaryal injury.96 It is relevant to consider how white matter function may alter, according to gender, after ischemic injury. Although reports of sexual dimorphism in white matter have been reported, these have largely been restricted to gross anatomic differences and numbers of myelinated axons. Previous studies have reported that significant differences occur in the development of white matter between the genders.97 In the mature nervous system, the average axonal diameter is larger and myelin sheaths are thicker in males than in females.98 However, a study by Cerghet et al99 found that the density of oligodendrocytes in three different white matter tracts (corpus callosum, fornix, and spinal cord) were on average 30% greater in males than females and interestingly, the rate of both oligodendrocyte proliferation and cell death were increased in males compared with females. However, whether gender influences the rate and distribution of oligodendrocyte cell death under pathologic conditions, such as cerebral ischemia, remains to be determined. In addition, although the rate of oligodendrocyte cell death has been shown to differ between the sexes, it remains to be determined whether gender affects the mechanism of cell death for oligodendrocytes, as it seems to for neuronal populations.

Hormones and Cerebral Ischemia

Numerous experimental studies have identified the contribution of hormonal influences on the outcome after ischemic stroke. For example, ovariectomized female mice have increased stroke volume compared with females with intact ovarian function.63 Such observations have led researchers to investigate the potential protective role of steroid hormones as a candidate treatment after ischemic stroke. In experimental studies, treatment with estrogens is neuroprotective in most animal models, and estrogen reduces infarct size when acutely administered to males, ovariectomized females, and reproductively senescent females (reviewed elsewhere100, 101). Although estrogen confers protection in experimental stroke, clinical translation of estrogen's protective effect has been unsuccessful to date.102

Along with estrogens, progesterone levels also dramatically reduce after the menopause and thus, may contribute to the endogenous cardiovascular protection women experience during their premenopausal years. A large number of experimental studies (reviewed elsewhere70) have investigated the neuroprotective potential of progesterone after cerebral ischemia. The majority of these studies have reported a positive effect of progesterone treatment after ischemic stroke and this appears to be consistent across numerous studies including both rats and mice, animals of both genders, and using both transient and permanent models of ischemia. Although as highlighted in a recent systematic review,103 further studies assessing the effectiveness of progesterone need to examine dose responses, time window of treatment effects, longer-term outcomes, and effects of gender and hormonal status of animals used.

Because of increased incidence of stroke in males, and worse outcome in male animals after experimental stroke, it has been suggested that androgens may be detrimental to the consequence of ischemic stroke. Recent investigations have focused on the role of testosterone in this male ischemic sensitivity largely because of the clinical observation that elevated endogenous testosterone levels correlate with increased stroke risk in young boys but not in young girls.104 However, in adults it seems that low circulating testosterone levels are associated with increased stroke incidence and worse outcomes after stroke in men.105, 106 In animals, low doses of testosterone administered to castrated animals decreases the amount of infarcted tissue after ischemic stroke, whereas infarct damage is exacerbated with higher doses of testosterone.107 The androgen receptor antagonist, flutamide, blocked these effects, suggesting a key role of the androgen receptor mediating the ischemic response to testosterone.108 Such results suggest that while testosterone may contribute to the ‘ischemia-sensitive' phenotype seen in males such effects are both complex and dose dependent in vivo.109

It is now well established that tissues and organs outside of the reproductive system, i.e., the brain, can also synthesize steroid hormones and this extragonadal production of hormones may also influence stroke sensitivity. In female animals, the absence of aromatase, which converts androgens to estrogens, results in increased infarction area after ischemic stroke.108 In vitro, female-derived astrocytes are protected from oxygen and glucose deprivation compared with male-derived astrocytes, which is abolished by pharmacological inhibition of aromatase56 suggesting that gender differences in estradiol production, by aromatase, may also contribute to the sex differences in sensitivity to cell death after ischemic insult.

Cerebral Ischemic Stroke—the Importance of Age and Gender

The total incidence of stroke is projected to rise substantially over the next 20 years, because of the rising age of the population. Age is the most important independent risk factor with stroke rates doubling every decade after the age of 55.1 In addition, age is a significant predictor of outcome independent of stroke severity, etiology, efficacy of thrombolysis, gender, and other vascular risk factors.110 In terms of outcome, older patients tend to have higher in-hospital mortality rates as well as poorer functional outcomes. Despite the importance of age and the knowledge that stroke is sexually dimorphic, experimental studies are largely conducted in healthy, young adult males thus, overlooking the impact of both age and gender. However, it appears that in experimental studies, the impact of both age and gender are not straightforward as the consistency of results in experimental stroke studies using aged animals is dependent upon the gender of the animals used.

In young rodents, the consensus seems to be that males sustain more histologic damage after experimental stroke than females. However, in aging animals, infarct size and functional outcomes can be worse in females than males.111 Studies involving aging female animals consistently report worse stroke outcome, in terms of increased lesion volume and poorer functional ability, than in younger females regardless of strain and stroke model used (reviewed elsewhere52). However, experimental studies using aged males have produced inconsistent results in terms of determining whether aged males have worse outcomes compared with young males. Some studies report that aged males experience greater ischemic damage, some report smaller ischemic lesions in aged males, and others report that aged males exhibit similar ischemic damage compared with young males.52

Although the aging process itself is associated with a greater risk of mortality and poorer long-term functional outcomes,52, 112, 113 these detrimental effects, in terms of mortality and longer-term functional ability, seem to be direct consequences of the aging process per se. If the infarct volume is reduced in aged females, by hormone supplementation, to a similar size to that seen in young females, greater functional disability and increased mortality remain in aged females.52 Possible explanations for worse outcome in aged females include the fact that female rodents demonstrate an age-related impairment in astrocyte function, which is not present in males.114 This could directly contribute to the infarct severity by inefficient glutamate clearance and enhanced cytokine production. Thus, normal aging and female gender may both be associated with an increased inflammatory response.115

Conclusions

Evidence exists to suggest that gender influences many aspects of ischemic stroke including stroke risk/incidence, diagnosis, symptoms, treatment and outcomes. It is well documented from epidemiologic studies that during the premenopausal years, female gender is associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke and hormonal factors have been investigated as potential protective treatments. However, as discussed in this review, sex differences in ischemic stroke probably result from a combination of factors, including elements intrinsic to the sex chromosomes as well as the effects of sex hormone exposure throughout the lifespan, although we cannot discount the influence also of cultural and social factors. Research investigating the sexual dimorphism of stroke is only beginning to emerge but several studies suggest that different cell pathways are activated in males and females after ischemic stroke. Stroke researchers must consider the translational relevance of such sex differences as many are unaware of the potential confounding factors of sex differences. The majority of experimental stroke studies continue to focus on using young male animals despite the Stroke Therapy Academy Industry Roundtable (STAIR) recommendations that neuroprotective studies be performed in both male and female rodents.116 A greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying sex differences in stroke and responsiveness to neuroprotection will lead to more appropriate treatment strategies for patients of both sexes.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rojas JI, Zurru MC, Romano M, Patrucco L, Cristiano E. Acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in the very old—risk factor profile and stroke subtype between patients older than 80 years and patients aged less than 80 years. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:895–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Seshadri S, Beiser A, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Au R, Kannel WB, et al. The lifetime risk of stroke: estimates from the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2006;37:345–350. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199613.38911.b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:915–926. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70193-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Wolfe CD, et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke. 2003;34:1114–1119. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000068410.07397.D7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kapral MK, Fang J, Hill MD, Silver F, Richards J, Jaigobin C, et al. Sex differences in stroke care and outcomes: results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke. 2005;36:809–814. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157662.09551.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Simpson CR, Wilson C, Hannaford PC, Williams D. Evidence for age and sex differences in the secondary prevention of stroke in Scottish primary care. Stroke. 2005;36:1771–1775. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000173398.99163.9e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Niewada M, Kobayashi A, Sandercock PA, Kaminski B, Czlonkowska A. Influence of gender on baseline features and clinical outcomes among 17,370 patients with confirmed ischaemic stroke in the International Stroke Trial. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;24:453–460. doi: 10.1159/000082999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gargano JW, Wehner S, Reeves MJ. Delays among patients with acute stroke. do presenting symptoms explain sex differences in emergency department. Stroke. 2009;40:1114–1120. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J. 1991;121:293–298. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fullerton HJ, Wu YW, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Risk of stroke in children. Neurol. 2003;61:189–194. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000078894.79866.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Golomb MR, Fullerton HJ, Nowak-Gottl U, Deveber G. Male predominance in childhood ischemic stroke: findings from the international pediatric stroke study. Stroke. 2009;40:52–57. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Z, Li J, Wang C, Yao X, Zhao X, Zhao X, et al. Gender differences in 1-year clinical characteristics and outcomes after stroke: results from the China national stroke registry. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fukuda M, Kanda T, Kamide N, Akutsu T, Sakai F. Gender differences in long-term functional outcome after first-ever ischemic stroke. Inter Med. 2009;48:967–973. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elijovich L, Chong JY. Current and future use of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010;12:316–321. doi: 10.1007/s11883-010-0121-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Allen CL, Bayraktutan U. Risk factors for ischaemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2008;3:105–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hankey GJ. Smoking and risk of stroke. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1999;6:207–211. doi: 10.1177/204748739900600403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirshner HS. Differentiating ischemic stroke subtypes: risk factors and secondary prevention. J Neurol Sci. 2009;279:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whisnant JP. Effectiveness versus efficacy of treatment of hypertension for stroke prevention. Neurology. 1996;46:301–307. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.2.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Arboix A, Oliveres M, Garciá-Eroles L, Maragall C, Massons J, Targa C. Acute cerebrovascular disease in women. Eur Neurol. 2001;45:199–205. doi: 10.1159/000052130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Palm F, Urbanek C, Olf J, Buggle F, Kleeman T, Hennerici MG, et al. Etiology, risk factors and sex differences in ischemic stroke in the Ludwigshafen stroke study, a population-based stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:69–75. doi: 10.1159/000333417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Roquer J, Campello AR, Gomis M. Sex differences in first-ever acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1581–1585. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000078562.82918.F6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Förster A, Gass A, Kern R, Wolf ME, Ottomeyer C, Zohsel K, et al. Gender differences in acute ischemic stroke. Etiology, stroke patterns and response to thrombolysis. Stroke. 2009;40:2428–2432. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Touzé E, Rothwell PM. Sex differences in heritability of ischemic stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2008;39:16–23. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heim LJ, Brunsell SC. Heart disease in women. Prim Care. 2000;27:741–746. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70172-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lisabeth LD, Brown DL, Hughes R, Majersik JJ, Morgenstern LB. Acute stroke symptoms, comparing women and men. Stroke. 2009;40:2031–2036. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.546812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stuart-Shor E, Wellenius GA, Dellolacono DM, Mittleman MA. Gender differences in presenting and prodromal stroke symptoms. Stroke. 2009;40:1121–1126. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Labiche L, Chan W, Saldin K, Morgenstern L. Sex and acute stroke presentation. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:453–460. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.128682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jerath NU, Reddy C, Freeman D, Jerath AU, Brown RD. Gender differences in presenting signs and symptoms of acute ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Gend Med. 2011;8:312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mandelzweig L, Goldbourt U, Bokyo V, Tanne D. Perceptual, social, and behavioural factors associated with delays in seeking medical care in patient with symptoms of acute stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1248–1253. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217200.61167.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kleindorfer DO, Miller R, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, Broderick JP, Khoury J, et al. Designing a message for public education regarding stroke: does FAST capture enough stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:2864–2868. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terent A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40:1082–1090. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Park SJ, Shin SD, Ro YS, Son KJ, Oh J. Gender differences in emergency stroke care and hospital outcome in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Silva GS, Lima FO, Camargo ECS, Smith WS, Lev MH, Harris GJ, et al. Gender differences in outcomes after ischemic stroke: role of ischemic lesions volume and intracranial large-artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30:470–475. doi: 10.1159/000317088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terent A, Hulter-Asberg K, Wester PO, et al. Sex differences in management and outcome after stroke: a Swedish national perspective. Stroke. 2003;34:1970–1975. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083534.81284.C5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eriksson M, Asplund K, Glader EL, Norrving B, Stegmayr B, Terent A, et al. Self-reported depression and use of antidepressants after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:936–941. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000121643.86762.9a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke fatigue: a 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in Sweden. Stroke. 2002;33:1327–1333. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000014248.28711.d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Franzen-Dahlin A, Laska AC. Gender differences in quality of life after stroke and TIA: a cross-sectional survey of out-patients. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:2386–2391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gokkaya NK, Aras MD, Cakci A. Health-related quality of life of Turkish stroke survivors. Int J Rehabi Res. 2005;28:229–235. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200509000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, et al. Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke. 2004;35:2340–2345. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000141977.18520.3b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ramani S, Byrne-Logan S, Freund KM, Ash A, Yu W, Moskowitz MA. Gender differences in the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:741–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith MA, Lisabeth LD, Brown DL, Morgenstern LB. Gender comparisons of diagnostic evaluation for ischemic stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;65:855–858. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176054.72325.0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gargano JW, Wehner S, Reeves M. Sex differences in acute stroke care in a statewide stroke registry. Stroke. 2008;39:24–29. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.493262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Group SCotPHSR Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing physicians' health study. Steering committee of the Physicians' Health Study Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:129–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198907203210301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1293–1304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Berger JS, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown DL. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006;295:306–313. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Poli D, Antonucci E, Grifoni E, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Prisco D. Gender differences in stroke risk of atrial fibrillation patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:938–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hill MD, Kent DM, Hinchey J, Rowley H, Buchan AM, Wechsler LR, et al. Sex-based differences in the effect of intra-arterial treatment of stroke: analysis of PROACT-2 study. Stroke. 2006;37:2322–2325. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000237060.21472.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kent DM, Buchan AM, Hill MD. The gender effect in stroke thrombolysis: of CASES, controls, and treatment-effect modification. Neurology. 2008;71:1080–1083. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316191.84334.bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shah SH, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Starkman S, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, et al. Influence of gender on outcomes after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2006;66:1745–1746. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000218208.31305.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu M, Dziennis S, Hurn PD, Alkayed NJ. Mechanisms of gender-linked brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27:163–179. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vagnerova K, Koerner IP, Hurn PD. Gender and the injured brain. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2008;107:201–204. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817326a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Heyer A, Hasselblatt M, von Ahsen N, Hafner H, Siren AL, Ehrenreich H. In vitro gender differences in neuronal survival on hypoxia in 17β-estradiol-mediated neuroprotection. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:317–321. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li H, Pin S, Zeng Z, Wang MM, Andreasson KA, McCullough LD. Sex differences in cell death. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:317–321. doi: 10.1002/ana.20538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu M, Hurn PD, Roselli CE, Alkayed NJ. Role of P450 aromatase in sex-specific astrocytic cell death. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:135–141. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu M, Oyarzabal EA, Yang R, Murphy SJ, Hurn PD. A novel method for assessing sex-specific and genotype-specific response to injury in astrocyte culture. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;171:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McCullough LD, Zeng Z, Blizzard KK, Debchoudhury I, Hurn PD. Ischemic nitric oxide and ploy (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in cerebral ischemia: male toxicity, female protection. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:502–512. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hagberg H, Wilson MA, Matsushita H, Zhu C, Lange M, Gustavsson M, et al. PARP-1 gene disruption in mice preferentially protects males from perinatal brain injury. J Neurochem. 2004;90:1068–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu F, Li Z, Li J, Siegel C, Yuan R, McCullough LD. Sex differences in caspase activation after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:1842–1848. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.538686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Renolleau S, Fau S, Goyenvalle C, Jloy LM, Chauvier D, Jacotot E, et al. Specific caspase inhibitor Q-VD-OPh prevents neonatal stroke in P7 rat: a role for gender. J Neurochem. 2007;100:1062–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yamori Y, Horie R, Handa H, Sato M, Fukase M. Pathogenetic similarity of strokes in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and humans. Stroke. 1976;7:46–53. doi: 10.1161/01.str.7.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Alkayed NJ, Harukuni I, Kimes AS, London ED, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Gender-linked brain injury in experimental stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:159–166. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hurn PD, Aardelt AA, Alkayed NJ, Crain BJ, Hu W, Kearney ML, et al. In: Krieglsein J, (eds). Pharmacology of Cerebral Ischemia Medpharm Scientific Publishers: Stuttgart; 2002P17–P24. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wise PM, Dubal DB, Wilson ME, Rau SW, Bottner M, Rosewell KL. Estradiol is a neuroprotective factor in the adult and aging bran: understanding of mechanisms derived from in vivo and in vitro studies. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;37:313–319. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Cheng J, Hurn PD. Sex shapes experimental ischemic brain injury. Steroids. 2009;75:754–759. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Toung TJ, Hurn PD, Traystman RJ, Sieber FE. Estrogen decreases infarct size after temporary focal ischemia in a genetic model of type I diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 2000;31:2701–2706. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Alkayed NJ, Murphy SJ, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Neuroprotective effect of female gonadal steroids in reproductively senescent female rats. Stroke. 2000;31:161–168. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.1.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Gibson CL, Gray LJ, Murphy SP, Bath PMW. Estrogens and experimental ischemic stroke: a systematic review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1103–1113. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Gibson CL, Coomber B, Rathbone J. Is progesterone a candidate neuroprotective factor for treatment following ischemic stroke. Neuroscientist. 2009;15:324–332. doi: 10.1177/1073858409333069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Kernan WN, Sarrel PM, Makuch R, Horwitz RJ. A clinical trial of estrogen-replacement therapy after ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1243–1249. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wassertheil-Smoller S, Hendrix SL, Limacher M, Heiss G, Kooperberg C, Baird A, et al. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in post-menopausal women—the Women's Health Initiative: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2673–2674. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.20.2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pathak EB, Sloan MA. Recent racial/ethnic disparities in stroke hospitalizations and outcomes for young adults in Florida, 2001-2006. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;32:302–311. doi: 10.1159/000208795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Avendano M, Kawachi I, Van Lenthe F, Boshuizen HC, Mackenbach JP, Van den Bos GAM, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence in the US elderly: the role of risk factors in the EPESE study. Stroke. 2006;37:1368–1373. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221702.75002.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:181–188. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70351-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. McFadden E, Luben R, Wareham N, Bingham S, Khaw K-T. Social class, risk factors, and stroke incidence in men and women. A prospective study in the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk cohort. Stroke. 2009;40:1070–1077. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Siegel C, Turtzo C, McCullough LD. Sex differences in cerebral ischemia: possible molecular mechanisms. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:2765–2774. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Mehta SL, Manhas N, Rahubir R. Molecular targets in cerebral ischemia for developing novel therapeutics. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2007;54:34–66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yu SW, Wang H, Poitras MF, Coombs C, Bowers WJ, Federoff HJ, et al. Mediation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-dependent cell death by apoptosis-inducing factor. Science. 2002;297:259–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1072221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu C, Xu F, Wang X, Shibata M, Uchiyama Y, Blomgren K, et al. Different apoptotic mechanisms are activated in male and female brains after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. J Neurochem. 2006;96:1016–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Park EM, Cho S, Frys KA, Glickstein SB, Zhou P, Anrather J, et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase contributes to gender differences in ischemic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:392–401. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Du L, Bayir H, Lai Y, Zhang X, Kockanek PM, Watkins SC, et al. Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:38563–38570. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405461200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kitano H, Young JM, Cheng J, Wang L, Hurn PD, Murphy SJ. Gender-specific response to isoflurane preconditioning in focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1377–1386. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Cordeau P, Jr, Lalancette-Herbert M, Weng YC, Kriz J. Live imaging of neuroinflammation reveals sex and estrogen effects on astrocyte response to ischemic injury. Stroke. 2008;39:935–942. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.501460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sakata A, Mogi M, Iwanami J, Tsukada K, Min L-J, Fujita T, et al. Sex-different effect of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on ischemic brain injury and cognitive function. Brain Res. 2009;1300:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang W, Iliff JJ, Campbell CJ, Wang RK, Hurn PD, Alkayed NJ. Role of soluble epoxide hydrolase in the sex-specific vascular response to cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:1475–1481. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yuan M, Siegel C, Zeng Z, Li J, Liu F, McCullough LD. Sex differences in the response to activation of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase pathway after experimental stroke. Exp Neurol. 2009;217:210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Li J, McCullough LD. Sex differences in minocycline-induced neuroprotection after experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:670–674. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in health and disease: a double-edged sword. Science. 2004;306:990–995. doi: 10.1126/science.1099993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Puyal J, Vaslin A, Mottier V, Clarke PG. Postischemic treatment of neonatal cerebral ischemia should target autophagy. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:378–389. doi: 10.1002/ana.21714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Maggi A, Ciana P, Belcredito S, Vegeto E. Estrogens in the nervous system: mechanisms and nonreproductive functions. Annu Rev Physiol. 2004;66:291–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032802.154945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tian Y, Stamova B, Jickling GC, Liu D, Ander BP, Bushnell C, et al. Effects of gender on gene expression in the blood of ischemic stroke patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:780–791. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Wright AF, Jacobs PA. Mortality in women with turner syndrome in Great Britain: a national cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4735–4742. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Turtzo LC, McCullough LD. Sex differences in stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26:462–474. doi: 10.1159/000155983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Pantoni L, Garcia JH, Gutierrez JA. Cerebral white matter is highly vulnerable to ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:1641–1647. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Po C, Kalthoff D, Kim YB, Nelles M, Hoehn M. White matter reorganization and functional response after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. PLOS One. 2012;7:e45629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Clayden JD, Jentschke S, Munoz M, Cooper JM, Chadwick JM, Banks T, et al. Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:1738–1747. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Yang S, Li C, Zhang W, Wang W, Tang Y. Sex differences in the white matter and myelinated nerve fibers of Long-Evans rats. Brain Res. 2008;1216:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Cerghet M, Skoff RP, Bessert D, Zhang Z, Mullins C, Ghandour MS. Proliferation and death of oligodendrocytes and myelin proteins are differentially regulated in male and female rodents. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1439–1447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2219-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu R, Yang SH. Window of opportunity: estrogen as a treatment for ischemic stroke. Brain Res. 2013;1511:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Suzuki S, Brown CM, Wise PM. Neuroprotective effects of estrogens following ischemic stroke. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Henderson VW, Lobo RA. Hormone therapy and the risk of stroke: perspectives 10 years after the Women's Health Initiative trials. Climacteric. 2012;15:229–234. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.656254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Gibson CL, Gray LJ, Bath PMW, Murphy SP. Progesterone for the treatment of experimental brain injury: a systematic review. Brain. 2008;131:318–328. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vannucci SJ, Hurn PD. Gender differences in pediatric stroke: is elevated testosterone a risk factor for boys. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:713–714. doi: 10.1002/ana.21925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Jeppesen LL, Jorgensen HS, Nakayam H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS, Winther K. Decreased serum testosterone in men with acute ischemic stroke. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:749–754. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.6.749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yeap BB, Hyde Z, Almeida OP, Norman PE, Chubb SA, Jamrozik K, et al. Lower testosterone levels predict incident stroke and transient ischemic attack in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2353–2359. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Cheng J, Hu W, Toung TJ, Zhang Z, Parker SM, Roselli CE, et al. Age-dependent effects of testosterone in experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:486–494. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Uchida M, Palmateer JM, Herson PS, DeVries AC, Cheng J, Hurn PD. Dose-dependent effects of androgens on outcome after focal cerebral ischemia in adult male mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:1454–1462. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. McCullough LD, Blizzard K, Simpson ER, Oz OK, Hurn PD. Aromatase cytochrome P450 and extragonadal estrogen play a role in ischemic neuroprotection. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8701–8705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-25-08701.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Moulin T, Tatu L, Vuiller F, Berger E, Chvot D, Rumbach L. Role of a stroke data bank in evaluating cerebral infarction subtypes: patterns and outcomes of 1,776 consecutive patients from the Besancon stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:261–271. doi: 10.1159/000016068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Liu F, Yuan R, Benashski SE, McCullough LD. Changes in experimental stroke outcome across the life span. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:792–802. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Shapira S, Sapir M, Wengier A, Grauer E, Kadar T. Aging has a complex effect on a rat model of ischemic stroke. Brain Res. 2002;925:148–158. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03270-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wang RY, Wang PS, Yang YR. Effect of age in rats following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Gerontology. 2003;49:27–32. doi: 10.1159/000066505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Lewis DK, Thomas KT, Selvamani A, Sohrabji F. Age-related severity of focal ischemia in female rats is associated with impaired astrocyte function. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:1123.e1–1123.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Mouton PR, Long JM, De-Liang L, Howard V, Jucker M, Calhoun ME, et al. Age and gender effects on microglia and astrocyte numbers in brains of mice. Brain Res. 2002;956:30–35. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03475-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Fisher M, Feuerstain G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, et al. Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke. 2009;40:2244–2250. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES