Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1971 Dec;22(6):1100–1103. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1100-1103.1971

Comparison of Three Methods Used to Isolate Dengue Virus Type 2

W Adrian Chappell 1, Charles H Calisher 1, Roberta F Toole 1,1, Kathryn C Maness 1, Donna R Sasso 1, Brian E Henderson 1,2
PMCID: PMC376492  PMID: 5002896

Abstract

During the 1969 dengue epidemic in Puerto Rico, human sera and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were collected for virus isolation and identification. Three methods of isolation were used and compared. In the first method, we inoculated newborn mice by the intracranial route, noted any signs of illness, and serially passed specimens in mice until virus was isolated. In the second method, we inoculated tube cultures of LLC-MK2 cells, noted any cytopathic effect (CPE), and assayed fluids for virus by plaque formation in LLC-MK2 cell monolayers. The third method was different from the second only in that the original specimens were first inoculated into fluid cultures of Singh's A. albopictus cells. No significant CPE was seen in LLC-MK2 cultures; however, distinct syncytial CPE was observed in A. albopictus cells. About the same number of virus isolates were made in each isolation system. Virus isolates from both sera and mosquitoes were identified as dengue type 2 by a plaque-reduction neutralization test in LLC-MK2 cells. The utility of the three methods, individually or in combination, is discussed and related to diagnostic and epidemic situations.

Full text

PDF
1100

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HALSTEAD S. B., SUKHAVACHANA P., NISALAK A. ASSAY OF MOUSE ADAPTED DENGUE VIRUSES IN MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURES BY AN INTERFERENCE METHOD. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Apr;115:1062–1068. doi: 10.3181/00379727-115-29117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Russell P. K., Buescher E. L., McCown J. M., Ordõnez J. Recovery of dengue viruses from patients during epidemics in Puerto Rico and East Pakistan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966 Jul;15(4):573–579. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1966.15.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Russell P. K., Nisalak A. Dengue virus identification by the plaque reduction neutralization test. J Immunol. 1967 Aug;99(2):291–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Russell P. K., Nisalak A., Sukhavachana P., Vivona S. A plaque reduction test for dengue virus neutralizing antibodies. J Immunol. 1967 Aug;99(2):285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Singh K. R., Paul S. D. Isolation of Dengue viruses in Aedes albopictus cell cultures. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;40(6):982–983. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuill T. M., Sukhavachana P., Nisalak A., Russell P. K. Dengue-virus recovery by direct and delayed plaques in LLC-MK2 cells. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968 May;17(3):441–448. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1968.17.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES