Abstract
For the total count of anaerobes from cecal and colon contents of pigs, the roll-tube method of Hungate, the anaerobic ringed-plate technique of Van der Heyde, and incubation of petri dishes in anaerobic jars were compared.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnes E. M., Impey C. S. The isolation and properties of the predominant anaerobic bacteria in the caeca of chickens and turkeys. Br Poult Sci. 1970 Oct;11(4):467–481. doi: 10.1080/00071667008415842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauchop T. Stomach microbiology of primates. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:429–436. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giesecke D., Wiesmayr S., Ledinek M. Peptostreptococcus elsdenii from the caecum of pigs. J Gen Microbiol. 1970 Nov;64(1):123–126. doi: 10.1099/00221287-64-1-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith H. W. The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Oct;90(2):495–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Heyde H., Henderickx H. Eine einfache Methode mit Ringplatten zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Anaerobiern. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1964 Dec;195(1):80–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiel-Korstanje JA van D., Winkler K. C. Medium for differential count of the anaerobic flora in human feces. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Jul;20(1):168–169. doi: 10.1128/am.20.1.168-169.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]