Skip to main content
PMC home page
Virology Journal logoLink to Virology Journal
. 2013 Jul 12;10:231. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-231

Artificial microRNA-mediated resistance against the monopartite begomovirus Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus

Irfan Ali 1, Imran Amin 1, Rob W Briddon 1, Shahid Mansoor 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3765727  PMID: 23844988

Abstract

Background

Cotton leaf curl disease, caused by single-stranded DNA viruses of the genus Begomovirus (family Geminiviridae), is a major constraint to cotton cultivation across Pakistan and north-western India. At this time only cotton varieties with moderate tolerance are available to counter the disease. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small RNA molecules that play an important role in plant development, signal transduction, and response to biotic and a biotic stress. Studies have shown that miRNAs can be engineered to alter their target specificity. Such artificial miRNAs (amiRNAs) have been shown to provide resistance against plant-infecting viruses.

Results

Two amiRNA constructs, based on the sequence of cotton miRNA169a, were produced containing 21 nt of the V2 gene sequence of Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV) and transformed into Nicotiana benthamiana. The first amiRNA construct (P1C) maintained the miR169a sequence with the exception of the replaced 21 nt whereas in the second (P1D) the sequence of the miRNA169a backbone was altered to restore some of the hydrogen bonding of the mature miRNA duplex. P1C transgenic plants showed good resistance when challenge with CLCuBV; plants being asymptomatic with low viral DNA levels. The resistance to heterologous viruses was lower and correlated with the numbers of sequence mismatches between the amiRNA and the V2 gene sequence. P1D plants showed overall poorer resistance to challenge with all viruses tested.

Conclusions

The results show that the amiRNA approach can deliver efficient resistance in plants against a monopartite begomoviruses and that this has the potential to be broad-spectrum, providing protection from a number of viruses. Additionally the findings indicate that the levels of resistance depend upon the levels of complementarity between the amiRNA and the target sequence and the sequence of the miRNA backbone, consistent with earlier studies.

Background

RNA interference (RNAi; also known as RNA silencing) is a general phenomenon in eukaryotes that plays diverse roles including defense against pathogens. The key features of RNAi include the production of 21–25 nt small RNAs (sRNA) by enzymes known as Dicers [1] and the formation of RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs) which contain Argonaute (Ago) proteins that directly carry out gene silencing at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels [2-5]. There are two major classes of sRNAs involved in RNAi, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). siRNAs result from the action of dicers on large double-stranded RNAs which have diverse origins. miRNAs are transcribed from their own genes or from introns and from fold-back structures with regions that are double stranded. In plants these primary-miRNAs are processed by the action of dicers into the precursor-miRNA (pre-miRNA) and then miRNA:miRNA* duplexes in the nucleus before being exported for incorporation into RISCs (miRNA* indicating the strand not incorporated into RISC).

Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) is a major constraint to cotton production across Pakistan and north-western India. The disease is caused by monopartite begomoviruses, the most important of which at this time is Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV), in association with a specific satellite [6]. Viruses of the genus Begomovirus (family Geminiviridae) have circular single-stranded DNA genomes and are transmitted by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci[7]. Although in the Old World a small number of begomoviruses have been identified, with genomes consisting of two ssDNA circles (known as DNA A and DNA B) the majority, including CLCuBuV [8], have genomes consisting of a single component which is a homolog of the DNA A of bipartite viruses. The genomes of monopartite (and DNA A components of bipartite) begomoviruses encode genes in both orientations. The virion-sense strand encodes the coat protein and the V2 gene whereas genes encoded on the complementary-sense strand are involved in viral DNA replication, regulating host and viral gene expression and overcoming host defences [7,8].

Following the demonstration by Vaucheret et al. [9] that changes in the sequences of mature miRNAs does not affect their biogenesis and the use of modified miRNAs (referred to as artificial-miRNA [amiRNAs]) to target viruses by Niu et al. [10] several studies have been successful in generating resistance to phytopathogenic viruses using amiRNA. Most recently this approach has been successfully applied to a bipartite begomovirus [11]. This has the advantage over approaches that rely on the production of siRNAs, which usually involve quite long virus derived sequences, that only short sequences are required, thus reducing the chances of recombination between the transgenic sequence and the infecting virus. Moreover, use of a 21 nt sequence derived from a begomovirus may avoid silencing of the transgene by the invading virus, as has been reported previously [12]. Here the amiRNA approach has for the first time been investigated as a means of generating resistance to a monopartite begomovirus.

Results

Production and analysis of transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring amiRNA

The amiRNA produced were based upon the sequence of the pre-miRNA169a (Figure 1A; [13]). For construct P1C the 21 nt of pre-miRNA169a that form the mature miRNA were replaced with 21 nt of the sequence of the V2 gene of CLCuBuV without any further changes (Figure 1C). For construct P1D the same change as in P1C was made but additionally sequence changes were introduced into the sequence of the backbone of pre-miRNA169a (in the sequence that forms the passenger strand [miRNA*] of the mature miRNA duplex) to restore some of the hydrogen bonding in the predicted structure of the pre-miRNA lost by introducing the CLCuBuV sequences (Figure 1B). The introduced sequences are near the center of the V2 gene (coordinates 265–285 of CLCuBuV; EMBL Accession No. AM421522) spanning the area encoding amino acids 46–51 of the predicted 118 amino acid V2 protein.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Predicted secondary structures of pre-miRNAs. The predicted structures of pre-miRNA169a (A), pre-amiRNA P1D (B) and pre-amiRNA P1C (C) are shown. For pre-miRNA169a the sequence which forms the mature miRNA is indicated. For the amiRNA this will be the introduced sequence of CLCuBuV. The region of sequence into which changes were introduced into pre-amiRNA P1D to maintain a structure similar to pre-miRNA169a is highlighted by a red box. The nucleotide replaced in the miRNA* sequence are shown by arrows.

The amiRNA constructs were transformed into N. benthamiana by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

A total of 13 Kanamycin resistant primary transformed N. benthamiana plants were obtained from the transformation (7 transformed with the P1C construct and 6 with P1D). However, PCR analysis for the presence of the amiRNA indicated that only 3 P1C and 4 P1D plants contained the transgene. These were progressed to the T2 generation by self-pollination and selection of resulting seed on Kanamycin. In the T3 generation a single line for each construct that did not show segregation was selected for virus inoculation. Southern blot analysis of these plants by digestion of extracted DNA with a restriction enzyme that cuts once within the transgene and probing with an NptII gene fragment yielded single bands, suggestive of single integration sites for each line (results no shown).

Challenge inoculation with CLCuBuV

The first symptoms of infection, mild downward curling of newly developing leaves, were visible on non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with CLCuBuV at 15 days post inoculation (dpi). By 28 dpi all non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants showed symptoms of infection consisting of downward leaf curling and some crumpling of newly developing leaves (Figure 2A, panel 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Symptoms exhibited by transgenic N. benthamiana plants following inoculation with begomoviruses. In each case transgenic plants harbouring the P1C (A) or P1D (B) constructs were inoculated with CLCuBuV (panel 2), CLCuKoV (panel 4), PedLCuV (panel 6) or ToLCNDV (panel 8). Non-transgenic plants inoculated with CLCuBuV (panel 1), CLCuKoV (panel 3), PedLCuV (panel 5) or ToLCNDV (panel 7) are shown for comparison. Panels 9 and 10 show non-inoculated, non-transgenic plants and mock-inoculated transgenic plants, respectively. Photographs were taken at 28 dpi.

For CLCuBuV inoculated transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring P1C a small number of plants (3 out of 20 plants inoculated) showed very mild symptoms at 15 dpi (Figure 2A, panel 2). However, these symptoms did not develop into the severe symptoms shown by non-transgenic plants, with all subsequently developing leaves showing no symptoms. PCR analysis showed the majority of plants (19 out of 20) contain viral DNA (Table 1). Southern blot analysis of DNA extracted from inoculated plants showed that plants that ex hibited the initial mild symptoms contained slightly more viral DNA than plants that remained asymptomatic (Figure 3, panel A, lanes 1 and 2). However, the transgenic plants all contained significantly lower viral DNA levels than infected, non-transgenic plants (Figure 3, panel A, lane 6).

Table 1.

Infectivity of CLCuBuV in transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring amiRNA

Plant Infectivity
 Diagnostics
(plants symptomatic/plants inoculated)
Exp. 1
 Exp.2
 PCR£
 Southern$
15dpi 28dpi 15dpi 28dpi Exp. 1 Exp.2  
N. b
 8/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 9/10
 10/10
 ++++
P1C
 2/10
 0/10
 1/10
 0/10
 10/10
 10/10
 +
P1D
 3/10
 8/10
 2/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 +++
N. b*
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 ND
N. b# 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 −
Open in a new tab

* Non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Agrobacterium cultures harbouring pGreen0029.

# Non-inoculated plants.

£ CLCuBuV was detected in nucleic acids extracted from plants by PCR using primers IRVF and IRVR (Table 5).

$ Southern hybridization results are given as strong hybridization (++++), through weak hybridization (+), to no hybridization detected (−). Some plants were not examined for the presence of virus by hybridization (ND).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Southern blot detection of begomoviruses in inoculated N. benthamiana plants. Blots were probed for the presence of CLCuBuV (A), CLCuKoV (B), PedLCuV (C) or ToLCNDV (D). For each blot DNA samples were extracted from inoculated transgenic plant harbouring the P1C (lanes 1 and 2) or P1D (lanes 3 and 4) constructs or inoculated non-transgenic plants (lanes 6 and 7; note DNA from only a single plant was used in panel A). DNA extracted from a non-inoculated transgenic plant was run in lane 5. Approx. 10 μg of total DNA was loaded in each case. The positions of viral single-stranded (ss), super-coiled (sc), linear (lin) and open-circular (oc) DNA forms are indicated.

P1D transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with CLCuBuV showed the first mild symptoms of infection at 15 dpi in a small number of plants (5 out of 20 plants inoculated). However, these plants did not continue to show severe symptoms with all newly developing leaves showing very mild leaf curling (18/20). All other plants remained symptomless throughout (Figure 2B, panel 2). Southern blot hybridization showed the presence of viral DNA at levels below those detected in infected, non-transgenic plants (Table 1).

Challenge inoculation with Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus

For non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV) the first symptoms of infection, consisting of a mild downward leaf curling of the edges of newly developing leaves, were observed at 21 dpi. All non-transgenic plants developed severe downward leaf curling symptoms in newly developing leaves by 28 dpi (Figure 2A, panel 3).

None of the transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring the P1C construct developed symptoms following inoculation with CLCuKoV (Figure 2A, panel 4). However, diagnostic PCR with primers CLCKV2F and CLCKV2R showed the presence of viral DNA in young, newly developing leaves even though no viral DNA could be detected by Southern blot hybridization (Figure 3b; Table 2). This suggests that viral DNA levels were below the detection threshold for hybridization.

Table 2.

Infectivity of CLCuKoV in transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring amiRNA

Plant Infectivity
 Diagnostics
(plants symptomatic/plants inoculated)
Exp. 1
 Exp.2
 PCR£
 Southern$
15dpi 28dpi 15dpi 28dpi Exp. 1 Exp.2  
N. b
 0/10
 10/10
 1/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++++
P1C
 0/10
 1/10
 0/10
 0/10
 10/10
 10/10
 +
P1D
 0/10
 8/10
 0/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++
N. b*
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 ND
N. b# 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 −
Open in a new tab

* Non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Agrobacterium cultures harbouring pGreen0029.

# Non-inoculated plants.

£ CLCuKoV was detected in nucleic acids extracted from plants by PCR using primers CLCKV2F and CLCKV2R (Table 5).

$ Southern hybridization results are given as strong hybridization (++++), through weak hybridization (+), to no hybridization detected (−). Some plants were not examined for the presence of virus by hybridization (ND).

The first symptoms of infection on transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring P1D following inoculation with CLCuKoV were visible in a small number of plants at 21 dpi and the majority of plants showed severe symptoms of infection by 28 dpi (Figure 2B, panel 4; Table 2). Southern blot analysis showed the presence of significant amounts of viral DNA in P1D transgenic plants, although this was lower than the levels of viral DNA detected in infected, non-transgenic plants (Figure 3, panel B).

Challenge inoculation with Pedilanthus leaf curl virus

The first symptoms of infection, a mild upward curling of the edges of newly developing leaves, in non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Pedilanthus leaf curl virus (PedLCuV) were visible at 15 dpi. By 21 dpi all non-transgenic plants exhibited severe symptoms consisting of upward leaf curling, vein thickening and leaf shortening (Figure 2A, panel 5; Table 3).

Table 3.

Infectivity of PedLCuV in transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring amiRNA

Plant Infectivity
 Diagnostics
(plants symptomatic/plants inoculated)
Exp. 1
 Exp.2
 PCR£
 Southern$
15dpi 28dpi 15dpi 28dpi Exp. 1 Exp.2  
N. b
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++++
P1C
 3/10
 10/10
 1/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 +++
P1D
 8/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++++
N. b*
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 ND
N. b# 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 −
Open in a new tab

* Non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Agrobacterium cultures harbouring pGreen0029.

# Non-inoculated plants.

£ PedLCuV was detected in nucleic acids extracted from plants by PCR using primers PedLCVV2F and PedLCuVV2R (Table 5).

$ Southern hybridization results are given as strong hybridization (++++), through weak hybridization (+), to no hybridization detected (−). Some plants were not examined for the presence of virus by hybridization (ND).

Mild symptoms of infection appeared in 3 out 10 inoculated transgenic plants harbouring P1C construct but all the plants showed severe symptoms by 21 dpi (Figure 2A, panel 6). In contrast, for plants transformed with the P1D construct, all inoculated plants showed initial mild symptoms at 15 dpi and severe symptoms by 21 dpi (Figure 2B, panel 6; Table 3). Southern blot hybridization of genomic DNA extracted from systemic leaves showed the accumulation of high levels of viral DNA in non-transgenic and P1D transgenic N. benthamiana plants (Figure 3, panel C). However, in transgenic plants harboring P1C possibly slightly less viral DNA accumulated than in non-transgenic plants.

Challenge inoculation with Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus

Non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with the bipartite Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV) showed the first symptoms of infection, mild leaf curling, at 15 dpi. By 21 dpi all plants were symptomatic showing upward leaf curling, leaf yellowing, vein thickening and a reduction in leaf size (Figure 2A, panel 7).

All transgenic plants inoculated with ToLCNDV behaved like the non-transgenic plants with initial symptoms appearing at 15 dpi and full symptoms in all plants developing by 21 dpi (Figure 2A, panel 8; Figure 2B, panel 8; Table 4). Southern blot analysis of inoculated plants showed the levels of ToLCNDV DNA in transgenic plants harbouring the P1D construct to be approximately equal to the levels of viral DNA detected in non-transgenic plants (Figure 3, panel E). However, for transgenic plants harbouring the P1C construct, the levels of ToLCNDV DNA were possibly marginally lower.

Table 4.

Infectivity of ToLCNDV in transgenic N. benthamiana plants harbouring amiRNA

Plant Infectivity
 Diagnostics
(plants symptomatic/plants inoculated)
Exp. 1
 Exp.2
 PCR£
 Southern$
15dpi 28dpi 15dpi 28dpi Exp. 1 Exp.2  
N. b
 10/10
 10/10
 9/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++++
P1C
 9/10
 10/10
 7/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 +++
P1D
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 10/10
 ++++
N. b*
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 0/10
 −
N. b# 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 −
Open in a new tab

* Non-transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Agrobacterium cultures harbouring pGreen0029.

# Non-inoculated plants.

£ ToLCNDV was detected in nucleic acids extracted from plants by PCR using primers ToLCNDVV2F and ToLCNDVV2R (Table 5).

$ Southern hybridization results are given as strong hybridization (++++), through weak (+) hybridization to no hybridization detected (−).

Discussion

Since the phenomenon was first identified RNAi has become the strategy of choice in efforts to develop transgenic resistance against viruses in plants. The siRNA strategy has been shown to be widely applicable against phytopathogenic viruses, including geminiviruses [14]. More recently engineered miRNAs have been investigated as a means of obtaining resistance following the demonstration that the targeting sequences pre-miRNAs could be modified [10]. This approach has been shown to effectively deliver resistance against viruses including, most recently, the bipartite begomovirus ToLCNDV [11,15,16]. The results obtained here show for the first time that the amiRNA may also deliver resistance against monopartite begomoviruses.

The P1C amiRNA construct delivered efficient resistance against both CLCuBuV and CLCuKoV. The majority of plants remained symptomless and the few plants that developed mild symptoms initially proceeded to lose those symptoms. Nevertheless, all CLCuBuV inoculated P1C plants were shown to contain viral DNA by PCR but (at least for plants that did not show the initial symptoms) the levels of DNA were below the detection threshold of Southern blot hybridization and significantly lower than infected non-transgenic control plants.

Less efficient resistance in P1C plants was evident to PedLCuV and ToLCNDV infections. Plants inoculated with PedLCuV showed delayed symptoms, although ultimately the viral DNA levels were high but lower than in non-transgenic plants. Inoculation of P1C plants with ToLCNDV had no apparent effects on the timing of symptom appearance or symptom severity. Nevertheless in some plants the levels of viral DNA were lower than in infected non-transgenic plants. An alignment of the V2 (AV2 for ToLCNDV) gene sequences homologous to those of the amiRNA of the four begomoviruses is shown in Figure 4. This shows the sequences of the V2 genes of the CLCuBuV and CLCuKoV to be identical in the region targetted by the P1C amiRNA. In contrast the V2 of PedLCV and the AV2 of ToLCNDV show mismatches (5 nucleotides for PedLCuV and 9 for ToLCNDV). The relative levels of resistance detected thus correlates with the levels of sequence identity, consistent with RNAi being homology dependent process [17].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Alignment of the V2 gene sequences homologous to the amiRNA of the bogomoviruses used. Shown are the sequences of the V2 genes of Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV), Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV) and Pedilanthus leaf curl virus (PedLCuV) as well as the AV2 gene of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV). Nucleotides differing from those of the CLCuBuV sequence are highlighted in red. Note that the sequences of amiRNAs P1C and P1D target (are complimentary to) the CLCuBuV sequence.

Overall the P1D amiRNA gave much poorer resistance although, with the possible exception of ToLCNDV, some symptom amelioration or reduction in viral DNA levels in plants was detected. This shows that the resistance resulting from amiRNA is influenced by the backbone sequence. This may be due to expression levels of the amiRNA or its interaction with Ago proteins, both of which have been shown to be affected by the sequence of the backbone [14,18].

Mutation of the V2 gene of monopartite begomoviruses leads to viruses that induce infections that are non-symptomatic with very low viral DNA levels [19-21], indicating that the V2 protein is a pathogenicity determinant and possibly involved in virus movement in plants. These features of V2 mutants are thus equivalent to the effects of silencing of the V2 gene using an amiRNA shown here. The product of the AV2 gene of bipartite begomoviruses is not essential for infectivity and mutation of these results in viruses that induce delayed but symptomatically normal infections [22], suggesting that this protein plays in part in, but is not essential for, virus movement; the essential virus-encoded proteins being encoded on the second component (DNA B; [23]). Although it is likely that the poor levels of resistance seen here to ToLCNDV are due to sequence differences with the amiRNA, it is also likely that part of the effect is due to complementation of the silenced AV2 gene functions by the DNA B. In light of this it is somewhat surprising that the amiRNA-mediated resistance targeting virion-sense genes of ToLCNDV reported by Vu et al. [11] resulted in either mild transient or no symptoms of infection. Possibly this is a host specific difference; the earlier study having used tomato whereas the study here used the highly permissive host N. benthamiana.

Manavella et al. [24] have shown that the use of 22 nt miRNA* or miRNA: miRNA* duplexes with asymmetric bulges can trigger transitivity–spread of the silencing outside the targeted sequence by the production of secondary siRNAs. Making use of this phenomenon may be useful in improving miRNA-mediated resistance against geminiviruses with the possibility of inducing TGS and should be investigated in the further studies. Also targeting multiple transcripts with distinct amiRNA may yield improved resistance and reduce the chance of the resistance being broken by sequence changes in the virus.

The inability of the amiRNA to yield immunity, even against the homologous virus, suggests that this approach is unlikely to yield a durable resistance. Although virus levels are low in transgenic plants, the presence of replicating virus would allow mutations in the target sequence to accumulate leading, eventually, to a virus able to overcome the resistance. This is a problem with all homology-based resistance strategies and is particularly significant for the amiRNA approach, where only a short sequence is targeted. There are a number of possible ways of overcoming this problem. Firstly the durability may be improved by designing the amiRNA to sequences that are more essential to the virus than those used here, such as the sequences of active sites of virus encoded proteins which are likely to prove less likely to change by mutation. Another possibility is to target both complementary and virion-sense sequences by multiple amiRNAs. Secondly the amiRNA resistance may be “pyramided” with additional resistances that act by distinct mechanisms, making it less likely that mutation will lead to susceptibility [25].

The results of the study conducted here show that transgenic expression of an engineered amiRNA can efficiently counter infection of a monopartite begomovirus but does not lead to immunity. The ability of the expressed miRNA to deliver resistance against heterologous viruses being depended upon the levels of complementarity between the miRNA and the target is consistent with RNAi being a sequence homology-dependent phenomenon. Additionally, the sequence of the miRNA backbone was shown to influence the levels of resistance obtained.

Methods

Production of amiRNA expression constructs

The amiRNA constructs were based on the backbone sequence of the cotton pre-miR169a [13] and were synthesized by Macrogen (Korea). Synthetic amiRNA were transferred to the expression vector pJIT163 under the control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and nos terminator [26] as EcoR1 and HindIII fragments. Resulting expression cassettes were cloned in the binary vector pGreen0029 [27].

Transformation of N. benthamiana and infectivity assays

N. benthamiana was transformed by the leaf disc method using Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 [28]. Agro bacterium-mediated inoculation of plants with CLCuBuV (AM421522; [8]), CLCuKoV (AJ496286; [29]), PedLCuV (AM948961; [30]) and ToLCNDV (DNA A [U15015] and DNA B [U15017]; [31]) was conducted as previously described by infiltration using 5 ml syringes [32].

Extraction of total nucleic acids from plants and detection of viral DNA

DNA was extracted from plants using the CTAB method [33]. Viral DNA was detected in extracts by PCR-mediated diagnostics using primer pairs IRVF/IRVR for CLCuBuV, CLCKV2F/CLCKV2R for CLCuKoV, PedLCVV2F/ PedLCuVV2R for PedLCuV and ToLCNDVV2F/ToLCNDVV2R for ToLCNDV (Table 5).

Table 5.

List of oligonucleotides primers used in the study

Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Virus/ Construct Size of amplicon (bp) Amplicon
BAF
 ACGCGTGCCGTGTTGCTGCCCCATTGTCC
 begomovirus
 ~2800
 genome
BAR
 ACGCGTATGGGCTGYCGAAGTTSASACG
  
  
  
BV2F
 ATGTGGGATCCACTGTTAAATGAG
 CLCuBuV
 356
 V2 gene
BV2R
 TAGGAACATCTGGACTTCTGTAC
  
  
  
CLCKV2F
 GTCGACAAGTATGCGTTTGAAAAATGTG
 CLCuKoV
 370
 V2 gene
CLCKV2R
 GGATCCACCTTCACATCCTCTAGGAAC
  
  
  
IRVF
 CGTGGAATTCATGTGGGATCCACTGTT
 CLCuBuV
 348
 V2 gene
IRVR
 TTCGTCGACGAACATCTGGACTTCTGTA
  
  
  
PedLCV2F
 ATGTGGGATCCGTTATTGAAC
 PedLCuV
 357
 V2 gene
PedLCV2F
 CTAGGAACATCTGGACTTCTG
  
  
  
TLCNDV2F
 GTCGACAAACATGTGGGATCCATTATTGC
 ToLCNDV
 361
 AV2 gene
TLCNDV2R
 CCCGGGCTTCTATACATTCTGTAC
  
  
  
P1CF
 GACAGTGGTCCCAAAGATGGA
 P1C
 273
 expression cassette*
P1CR
 ATCGGGAATAATGGTCCTAA
  
  
  
P1DF
 GACAGTGGTCCCAAAGATGGA
 P1D
 275
 expression cassette*
P1DR
 TAGCCCATATGCCCGGATTG
  
  
  
35SF
 GACAGTGGTCCCAAAGATGGA
 pJIT163
 150
 CaMV 35S promoter
35SR
 CAGTGGAGATATCACATCAATCCA
  
  
  
TLCNDBF
 GTCCCGGGTATGTCACGTATCCATCA
 ToLCNDV DNA B
 550
 NSP gene
TLCNDBR TATCGATTTATCCAATGTAATTAAGAAT      
Open in a new tab

* These primer pairs amplify from the 3′ end of the CaMV 35S promoter (P1CF and P1DF) to the 3′ end of the amiRNA construct (primers P1CR and P1DR being the reverse complement of the sequence of the amiRNA backbone [amiRNA* sequence]).

Viral DNA was detected by Southern blot hybridization essentially as described previously [34]. DNA was resolved on 1% agarose gels in 0.5 × TAE buffer and transferred to nylon membrane (Hybond N+, GE Healthcare). Blots were hybridized with viral DNA fragments produced by PCR with the primers listed in Table 5 and labeled with DIG using a PCR DIG probe synthesis kit (Roche, Switzerland) according to manufacturer’s protocol.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

IrA conducted all experiments and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. ImA, SM and RWB edited the paper and coordinated the research work. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Irfan Ali, Email: irfan.nibge@gmail.com.

Imran Amin, Email: imranamin1@yahoo.com.

Rob W Briddon, Email: rob.briddon@gmail.com.

Shahid Mansoor, Email: shahidmansoor7@gmail.com.

Acknowledgements

IrA was supported by an indigenous Ph.D scholarship from the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Government of Pakistan. RWB was supported by the HEC under the “Foreign Faculty Hiring Program”. This research has also been supported by a project from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Pakistan.

References

  1. Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 2001;10:363–366. doi: 10.1038/35053110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hammond SM, Bernstein E, Beach D, Hannon GJ. An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature. 2000;10:293–296. doi: 10.1038/35005107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meister G, Tuschl T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature. 2004;10:343–349. doi: 10.1038/nature02873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Verdel A, Jia S, Gerber S, Sugiyama T, Gygi S, Grewal SIS, Moazed D. RNAi-Mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex. Science. 2004;10:672–676. doi: 10.1126/science.1093686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, Sieburth L, Voinnet O. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science. 2008;10(320):1185–1190. doi: 10.1126/science.1159151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sattar MN, Kvarnheden A, Saeed M, Briddon RW. Cotton leaf curl disease–an emerging threat to cotton production worldwide. J Gen Virol. 2013;10:695–710. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.049627-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown JK, Fauquet CM, Briddon RW, Zerbini M, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J. In: Virus taxonomy–ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editor. London, Waltham, San Diego: Associated Press, Elsevier Inc; 2012. Geminiviridae; pp. 351–373. [Google Scholar]
  8. Amrao L, Amin I, Shahid S, Briddon RW, Mansoor S. Cotton leaf curl disease in resistant cotton is associated with a single begomovirus that lacks an intact transcriptional activator protein. Virus Res. 2010;10(152):153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vaucheret H, Vazquez F, Crete P, Bartel DP. The action of ARGONAUTE1 in the miRNA pathway and its regulation by the miRNA pathway are crucial for plant development. Genes Dev. 2004;10:1187–1197. doi: 10.1101/gad.1201404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Niu QW, Lin SS, Reyes JL, Chen KC, Wu HW, Yeh SD, Chua NH. Expression of artificial microRNAs in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers virus resistance. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;10(11):1420–1428. doi: 10.1038/nbt1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vu TV, Choudhury NR, Mukherjee SM. Transgenic tomato plants expressing artificial microRNAs for silencing the pre-coat and coat proteins of a begomovirus, Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, show tolerance to virus infection. Virus Res. 2012;10:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Noris E, Lucioli A, Tavazza R, Caciagli P, Accotto GP, Tavazza M. Tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus can overcome transgene-mediated RNA silencing of two essential viral genes. J Gen Virol. 2004;10:1745–1749. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.79944-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang B, Wang Q, Wang K, Pan X, Liu F, Guo T, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Identification of cotton microRNAs and their targets. Gene. 2007;10(1–2):26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prins M, Laimer M, Noris E, Schubert J, Wassenegger M, Tepfer M. Strategies for antiviral resistance in transgenic plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008;10:73–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00447.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ai T, Zhang L, Gao Z, Zhu CX, Guo X. Highly efficient virus resistance mediated by artificial microRNAs that target the suppressor of PVX and PVY in plants. Plant Biol. 2011;10:304–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kung YJ, Lin SS, Huang YL, Chen TC, Harish SS, Chua NH, Yeh SD. Multiple artificial microRNAs targeting conserved motifs of the replicase gene confer robust transgenic resistance to negative-sense single-stranded RNA plant virus. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;10:303–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00747.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Agrawal N, Dasaradhi PVN, Mohmmed A, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK, Mukherjee SK. RNA Interference: Biology, mechanism, and applications. Microb Mol Biol Rev. 2003;10:657–685. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.657-685.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu H, Hu F, Wang R, Zhou X, Sze SH, Liou LW, Barefoot A, Dickman M, Zhang X. Arabidopsis Argonaute10 specifically sequesters miR166/165 to regulate shoot apical Meristem development. Cell. 2011;10:242–256. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rigden JE, Dry IB, Mullineaux PM, Rezaian MA. Mutagenesis of the virion-sense open reading frames of tomato leaf curl virus. Virology. 1993;10:1001–1005. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wartig L, Kheyr-Pour A, Noris E, de Kouchovsky F, Jouanneau F, Gronenborn B, Jupin I. Genetic analysis of the monopartite tomato yellow leaf curl geminivirus: roles of V1, V2, and C2 ORFs in viral pathogenesis. Virology. 1997;10:132–140. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.8406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Iqbal Z, Sattar MN, Kvarnheden A, Mansoor S, Briddon RW. Effects of the mutation of selected genes of Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus on infectivity, symptoms and the maintenance of Cotton leaf curl Multan beta satellite. Virus Res. 2012;10:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Padidam M, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM. The role of AV2 (“precoat”) and coat protein in viral replication and movement in tomato leaf curl geminivirus. Virology. 1996;10:390–404. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanderfoot AA, Lazarowitz SG. Cooperation in viral movement: the geminivirus BL1 movement protein interacts with BR1 and redirects it from the nucleus to the periphery. Plant Cell. 1995;10:1185–1194. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.8.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Manavella PA, Koenig D, Weigel D. Plant secondary siRNA production determined by microRNA-duplex structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;10:2461–2466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200169109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ilyas M, Amin I, Mansoor S, Briddon RW, Saeed M. In: Emerging Gemini viral diseases and their management. Sharma P, Gaur RK, Ikegami M, editor. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2010. Challenges for transgenic resistance against geminiviruses; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  26. Guerineau F, Mullineaux P. In: Plant molecular biology Lab fax. R R D Croy, editor. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers; 1993. Plant transformation and expression vectors; pp. 121–147. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hellens RP, Edwards EA, Leyland NR, Bean S, Mullineaux PM. pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agro bacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;10:819–832. doi: 10.1023/A:1006496308160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985;10:1229–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4691.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mansoor S, Briddon RW, Zafar Y, Stanley J. Gemini virus disease complexes: an emerging threat. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;10:128–134. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ilyas M, Qazi J, Mansoor S, Briddon RW. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of begomoviruses infecting legumes in Pakistan. J Gen Virol. 2010;10:2091–2101. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.020404-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Padidam M, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM. Tomato leaf curl geminivirus from India has a bipartite genome and coat protein is not essential for infectivity. J Gen Virol. 1995;10:25–35. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-1-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hussain M, Mansoor S, Iram S, Zafar Y, Briddon RW. The hypersensitive response to tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus nuclear shuttle protein is inhibited by transcriptional activator protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;10:1581–1588. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-12-1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;10:13–15. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sambrook J, Frisch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Virology Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES