Abstract
Alkynones were treated with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate to generate β-iodoallenolates, which underwent intramolecular aldol reactions to produce cycloalkenyl alcohols. Diastereoselective oxa-Michael ring closure could then be induced by treatment with a catalytic amount of gold(III) chloride, affording highly functionalized tetrahydropyran-containing ring systems.
Keywords: gold, oxa-Michael, cyclization, tetrahydropyranone
The tetrahydropyran heterocycle is a common structural motif found in pharmacologically active small molecules.[1] The development of effective diastereoselective strategies for synthesizing oxadecalins[2] and other bicyclic tetrahydropyran ring systems will help expand the synthetic toolbox, especially if the oxacyclic products contain multiple functional handles. While a 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael addition has been used to prepare a number of tetrahydropyran targets,[3-9] the strongly acidic reaction conditions commonly employed can compromise diastereoselectivity and destroy sensitive functionality. In this update, we describe a mild protocol for inducing 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael reaction using catalytic AuCl3, and demonstrate the application of the method to the synthesis of highly functionalized tetrahydropyran-4-ones.
In 2009, we reported a three-step cascade cyclization involving β-iodoallenolates 2 (Scheme 1).[10] Alkynones of type 1 could be treated with BF3·OEt2/tetra-n-butylammonium iodide to afford oxacycles 4, via the 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael addition of cycloalkenyl alcohols of type 3. (Scheme 1). Since reporting these findings, we have systematically prepared and cyclized a series of alkynones 1 with different R1, R2 and R3 substituents (Table 1), and found that while the β-iodoallenolate formation and intramolecular aldol cyclization steps are efficient in all cases, the enone substitution pattern has a profound effect on oxa-Michael addition behavior.
Scheme 1. BF3·OEt2-Promoted Cyclization Cascade.
Table 1. β-Iodoallenolate Cyclization using BF3·OEt2[a].
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Entry | 1 | R1 | R2 | R3 | Product (Yield) |
| 1 | 1a | Me | Me | H | 4a;[b] 77% |
| 2 | 1b | Me | Ph | H | 3b; 85% |
| 3 | 1c | Me | p-methoxyphenyl | H | 4c;[b][c] 74% |
| 4 | 1d | Me | t-Bu | H | 3d; 85% |
|
| |||||
| 5 | 1e | H | Me | H | 4e;[d][e] 60% |
| 6 | 1f | H | Ph | H | 3f; 77% |
| 7 | 1g | H | p-nitrophenyl | H | 3g; 86% |
| 8 | 1h | H | p-methoxyphenyl | H | 3h; 86% |
|
| |||||
| 9 | 1i | H | Me | Me | 3i; 50% |
| 10 | 1j | Me | -(CH2)4- | 3j; 88% | |
Reaction conditions: Alkynone (1.0 equiv), BF3·OEt2 (1.3 equiv), and n-Bu4NI (1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.10 M) at −40 °C for 1-3 h.
Reaction warmed to 0 °C.
Oxadecalin was obtained as a mixture of diastereoisomers (3.2:1 dr).
Reaction warmed to rt for 39 h.
Oxadecalin was isolated as a single diastereoisomer.
Experiments varying the R2 substituent revealed that fused tetrahydropyran-4-ones of type 4 were formed efficiently when R2=Me or p-methoxyphenyl (entries 1 and 3, Table 1), but not at all when R2=phenyl or tertbutyl (entries 2 and 4). In disubstituted enone substrates (R1=H), oxa-Michael addition only occurred when R2=methyl (entry 5). Oxadecalin formation was not observed in cyclizations of alkynones where R2=aryl (entries 6-8). Similarly, the oxadecalin products 4 were not observed in cyclizations of alkynones with alkyl substitutents at R3 (entries 9 and 10).
The fact that the oxa-Michael ring closure is not observed in substrates 1b, 1d and 1f-1j suggests that it is difficult to activate enones with extended conjugation. Substrate 1c (Table 1, entry 3), which is most able to support carbocationic character at the enone β-carbon, was the only β-aryl enone that underwent oxa-Michael ring closure. Oxa-Michael closure also failed in substrate 1d (entry 4), indicating that steric bulk at the enone terminus can also hinder the cyclization.
Substrates 1i and 1j, which contain α-substituted enones, could not be converted to oxadecalins either (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). It is possible that A-1,3 strain between R3 and the Lewis acid prevents rotation of 3i and 3j from the s-cis conformer to the s-trans conformer required for oxa-Michael ring closure (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Impact of R3 on the Oxa-Michael Addition.
It was also possible to access two novel cycloalkene ring systems from alkynones 1k and 1l, using BF3·OEt2 as a promoter (equations 1 and 2). When alkynone 1k was treated with BF3·OEt2 at −40 °C, cyclobutenyl alcohol 3k was generated in 64% yield (equation 1). However, we were unable to manufacture the [4,6]-system because the cyclobutane ring opened under Lewis acidic conditions at temperatures higher then −40 °C. Indene 3l could be prepared in high yield from 1f in just 10 min using BF3·OEt2 at −40 °C (equation 3), but formation of the corresponding oxadecalin was inefficient (vide infra.)
![]() |
(1) |
![]() |
(2) |
This study highlights the limitations associated with 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael additions in highly functionalized substrates: only a handful of cycloalkenyl alcohols can be cyclized using BF3·OEt2.[10] A complex mixture of products is obtained from many of these reactions, and the cyclohexenols decompose upon exposure to protic acids.[11] We wanted to identify an alternative promoter that could selectively activate the enone toward oxa-Michael ring closure without destroying the other functionality in the molecule. We chose to examine AuCl3, which is a strong Lewis acid known for its oxophilic character (Table 2).[12]
Table 2.
6-endo-trig Oxa-Michael Additions with BF3·OEt2 (1.3 equiv) vs. AuCl3 (10 mol%).
| entry | substrate | BF3·OEt2[a] temp time, yield | AuCl3[b] temp time, yield | tetrahydropyranone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
–40 to 0 °C 3 h 93%[c] | 0 °C to rt 30 min 92% |
|
| 2 |
|
–40 to rt 39 h 88%[d] | 0 °C to rt 1 h 88% |
|
| 3 |
|
–40 to rt 4.5 h 89%[d] | 0 °C to rt 30 min 89% |
|
| 4 |
|
60 °C[e] 12 h 36%[f] | 0 °C to rt 30 min 77% |
|
| 5 |
|
-[g] | 0 °C 3 h 40% |
|
| 6 |
|
-[g] | 0 °C to rt 6 h[h] 55% |
|
| 7 |
|
-[g] | -[g] |
|
| 8 |
|
–40 °C 2 h 20% | 0 °C 30 min 50% |
|
Reaction conditions: Substrate (0.3 mmol), BF3·OEt2 (1.3 equiv), n-Bu4NI (1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.10 M).
Reaction conditions: Substrate (0.06 mmol), AuCl3 (10 mol%), CH2Cl2 (0.10 M) at 0 °C to rt.
When the reaction run was with BF3·OEt2 (10 mol %), 4a was obtained in 87% yield for 3 h (–40 °C to 0 °C); 93% conversion
Estimated yield of oxa-Michael addition step, based on individual results from the β-iodoallenolate aldol step and the Scheme 1 cascade.
Reaction run in 1,2-dichloroethane.
87% conversion.
No cyclization occurred. In most cases, a complex mixture of undesired products was obtained.
Reaction run with 20 mol% of AuCl3.
Indeed, treatment of 3a with 10 mol % of AuCl3 in dichloromethane furnished oxadecalin 4a in 92% yield (Table 2, entry 1). In contrast, cyclization of 3a could not be promoted using (Ph3P)AuCl, Au[P(t-Bu)2(o-biphenyl)](MeCN)SbF6, (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6, or AgSbF6, which is consistent with the hypothesis that a strongly oxophilic, Lewis acidic catalyst is required. The reaction carried out with AuCl3 was also faster than the BF3·OEt2 induced cyclization (30 min vs. 3 h).[13] We also treated alkynone 1a with AuCl3/n-Bu4NI in an attempt to initiate the two-step β-iodoallenolate-mediated cyclization, but 1a was inert to these reaction conditions, even at elevated temperatures.
These mild, catalytic conditions were then tested on other substrates. Cyclization of substrates 3e and 3m could be achieved with either BF3·OEt2 (1.3 equiv) or AuCl3 (10 mol%). The yield of the oxacycle 4 was comparable for the two protocols, but the reaction rate was much faster for the AuCl3-catalyzed reactions (Table 2, entries 2 and 3). The oxa-Michael ring closure of substrate 3l using BF3·OEt2 required elevated temperatures, and 4l was obtained in only 36% yield. In contrast, when 3l was treated with 10 mol % AuCl3, oxacycle 4l was obtained in 77% yield (Table 2, entry 4). Substrates 3b and 3n, which did not cyclize in the presence of BF3·OEt2, underwent oxa-Michael addition upon exposure to catalytic AuCl3, producing oxacycles 4b and 4n in moderate yields (entries 5 and 6). Oxadecalin 4b was obtained in moderate yield (40%) as a single diastereomer, and the structure was confirmed by nOe analysis (see supporting information). Tertiary alcohol 1o could not be induced to undergo oxa-Michael ring closure using either BF3·OEt2 or AuCl3 (entry 7): the only reaction observed was elimination of the tertiary alcohol.
In the context of substrate 3p,[14] a key intermediate in our approach to phomactin A,[15-17] the AuCl3 protocol was especially valuable. While BF3·OEt2 (1.3 equiv) produced target oxadecalin 4p in only 20% yield, treatment of 3p with 10 mol% AuCl3 catalyzed the desired oxa-Michael ring closure to afford 4p in 50% yield (Table 2, entry 8).
In every case, the 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael ring closures occurred diastereoselectively, with the larger enone β-substituent emerging trans to the ring junction (cf. tetrahydropyrans 4b, 4c, and 4e). A number of studies have indicated that most acid-catalyzed 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael reactions are thermodynamically controlled, and deliver the most stable tetrahydrapyranone product.[18] However, Gouverneur has demonstrated that 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael additions catalyzed by cationic palladium(II) and aluminium Lewis acid complexes are kinetically controlled.[5] Our experimental and computational results suggest that the AuCl3-catalyzed oxa-Michael cyclization also occurs irreversibly, with the high diastereoselectivity arising from a kinetically controlled ring closure.[4,19-20] Given the importance of stereoelectronic effects in other oxa-Michael endotrig cyclizations,[21] we tentatively attribute the stereoselectivity of the reaction to enhanced Oσ→Cπ* orbital overlap in the transition state leading to the observed trans isomer, relative to the cis.
In summary, we have shown that AuCl3 is an effective catalyst for 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael addition. Relative to cyclization results obtained using stoichiometric BF3·OEt2 as promoter, the reactions are faster and the substrate scope is broader. The reaction is highly diastereoselective, and the conditions are mild enough to be used on substrates with acid-sensitive functionality. Application to the synthesis of the bicyclo[9.3.1]pentadecane core of the phomactin natural products demonstrates the utility of the protocol.
Experimental Section
General
Reactions were carried out in oven-dried glassware under an argon atmosphere. Reagents were used as obtained from commercial supplier without further purification. Solvents were purchased from Fisher and dispensed using the Glass Contour solvent purification system. ACS grade hexanes and ethyl acetate were used for column chromatography. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on precoated silica gel 60 F254 glass-supported plates (EMD product). Column chromatography was carried out on 60Å silica gel (230-400 mesh) (EMD product). Visualization on thin layer chromatography was done with a UV lamp followed by staining with either potassium permanganate/heat or p-anisaldehyde/heat. Low resolution mass spectra (MS) and high resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured by Mass Spectrometry Lab of the University of Illinois, Urbana, and at the Chemistry Instrumentation Center at the University of Buffalo. Infrared spectra (IR) were recorded on 8400S Shimadzu FTIR (MIRacleTM ATR diamond) spectrometer. Absorbance frequencies are given in cm-1 at the peak maximum.
General Procedure for β-Iodoallenolate Cyclizations Run with BF3·OEt2
Tetra-n-butylammonium iodide (1.0 equiv) was added to a stirred solution of the alkynone 1 in dry CH2Cl2 (0.10 M) at −40 °C. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (1.3 equiv) was then added dropwise. The reaction was carried out at the indicated temperature and time. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution, and extracted with ethyl acetate (3×). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated Na2S2O3 solution (2×), brine (1×), dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using different gradients of hexanes and ethyl acetate to afford the pure products.
General Procedure for BF3·OEt2-Promoted Oxa-Michael Additions
The cycloalkenyl alcohol 3 (1.0 equiv) was diluted in dry CH2Cl2 (0.10 M) at −40 °C. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (1.3 equiv) was then added dropwise. The reaction was carried out at the indicated temperature and time. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution, and extracted with ethyl acetate (3×). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated Na2S2O3 solution (2×), brine (1×), dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using different gradients of hexanes and ethyl acetate to afford the pure products.
General Procedure for AuCl3-Catalyzed Oxa-Michael Additions
The cycloalkenyl alcohol 3 (1.0 equiv) was diluted in dry CH2Cl2 (0.10 M). AuCl3 (10 mol %) was added at 0 °C, and the reaction was allowed to warm to rt. After completion of the reaction by TLC, the reaction mixture was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using different gradients of hexanes and ethyl acetate to afford the pure products.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institute of Health (NIGMS R01 GM079364, supporting J. C.) and the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-0847851, supporting D. L.) for funding this work. We are also grateful to Dr. Alice Bergmann (University of Buffalo) and Dr. Furong Sun (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) for carrying out high-resolution mass spectroscopy.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201######.
References
- 1.Clarke PA, Santos S. Eur J Org Chem. 2006:2045–2053. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tang Y, Oppenheimer J, Song Z, You L, Zhang X, Hsung RP. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:10785–10813. [Google Scholar]
- 3.For a general review on methods for tetrahydropyran synthesis, see reference 1. Also see: Tetrahedron Symposium-In-Print. 2011;67:27–28.
- 4.For reviews on the oxa-Michael addition reaction, see Nising CF, Bräse S. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1218–1228. doi: 10.1039/b718357g.Nising CF, Bräse S. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:988–999. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15167c.
- 5.Reiter M, Turner H, Gouverneur V. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:7190–7203. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yao H, Ren J, Tong R. Chem Commun. 2013;49:193–195. doi: 10.1039/c2cc37772a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fuwa H, Mizunuma K, Matsukida S, Sasaki M. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:4995–5010. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paterson I, Chen DYK, Coster MJ, Anceña JL, Bach J, Gibson KR, Keown LE, Oballa RM, Trieselmann T, Wallace DJ, Hodgson AP, Norcross RD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:4055–4060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) Hilli F, White JM, Rizzacasa MA. Org Lett. 2004;6:1289–1292. doi: 10.1021/ol0497943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Hilli F, White JM, Rizzacasa MA. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:5054–5068. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ciesielski J, Canterbury DP, Frontier AJ. Org Lett. 2009;11:4374–4377. doi: 10.1021/ol901721y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.A common method for inducing 6-endo-trig oxa-Michael ring closure is treatment with a Brønsted acid: see references 5-9.
- 12.For reviews on gold Lewis acids, see: Zhang L, Sun J, Kozmin SA. Adv Synth Catal. 2006;348:2271–2296.Hashmi ASK, Hutchings GJ. Angew Chem. 2006;118:8064–8105.Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:7896–7936. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602454.Fürstner A, Davies PW. Angew Chem. 2007;119:3478–3519.Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:3410–3449. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604335.Hashmi SK. Chem Rev. 2007;107:3180–3211. doi: 10.1021/cr000436x.Li Z, Brouwer C, He C. Chem Rev. 2008;108:3239–3265. doi: 10.1021/cr068434l.Arcadi A. Chem Rev. 2008;108:3266–3325. doi: 10.1021/cr068435d.Jiménez-Núñez E, Echavarren AM. Chem Rev. 2008;108:3326–3350. doi: 10.1021/cr0684319.Gorin DJ, Sherry BD, Toste FD. Chem Rev. 2008;108:3351–3378. doi: 10.1021/cr068430g.Michelet V, Toullec PY, Genêt JP. Angew Chem. 2008;120:4338–4386. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701589.Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4268–4315. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701589.Fürstner A. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:3208–3221. doi: 10.1039/b816696j.Corma A, Leyva-Pérez A, Sabater MJ. Chem Rev. 2011;110:1657–1712. doi: 10.1021/cr100414u.Aubert C, Fensterbank L, Garcia P, Malacria M, Simonneau A. Chem Rev. 2011;110:1954–1993. doi: 10.1021/cr100376w.Krause N, Winter C. Chem Rev. 2011;110:1994–2009. doi: 10.1021/cr1004088.
- 13.a) Sromek AW, Rubina M, Gevorgyan V. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10500–10501. doi: 10.1021/ja053290y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Shi Z, He C. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5964–5965. doi: 10.1021/ja031953a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Yamamoto Y. J Org Chem. 2007;72:7817–7831. doi: 10.1021/jo070579k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ciesielski J, Cariou K, Frontier AJ. Org Lett. 2012;14:4082–4085. doi: 10.1021/ol3017116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a) Sugano M, Sato A, Iijima Y, Oshima T, Furuya K, Kuwano H, Hata T, Hanzawa H. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:5463–5464. [Google Scholar]; b) Sugano M, Sato A, Iijima Y, Furuya K, Haruyama H, Yoda K, Hata T. J Org Chem. 1994;59:564–569. [Google Scholar]
- 16.For total syntheses of phomactin A, see: Goldring WPD, Pattenden G. Chem Commun. 2002:1736. doi: 10.1039/b206041h.Mohr PJ, Halcomb RL. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:1712. doi: 10.1021/ja0296531.Tang Y, Cole KP, Buchanan GS, Li G, Hsung RP. Org Lett. 2009;11:1591. doi: 10.1021/ol900237e.Buchanan GS, Cole KP, Tang Y, Hsung RP. J Org Chem. 2011;76:7027. doi: 10.1021/jo200936r.Buchanan GS, Cole KP, Li G, Tang Y, You L, Hsung RP. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:10105. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.09.111.
- 17.For selected synthetic strategies targeting phomactin A, see reference 14 and Seth PP, Totah NI. Org Lett. 2000;2:2507. doi: 10.1021/ol0061788.Teng D, Wang B, Augatis AJ, Totah NI. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:4605. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.04.122.Chemler SR, Iserloh U, Danishefsky SJ. Org Lett. 2001;3:2949. doi: 10.1021/ol0161357.Mi B, Maleczka RE. Org Lett. 2001;3:1491. doi: 10.1021/ol015807q.Shapland PDP, Thomas EJ. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:4201.and references cited therein Schwartz KD, White JD. Org Lett. 2011;13:248. doi: 10.1021/ol1026816.Huang S, Du G, Lee C. J Org Chem. 2011;76:6534. doi: 10.1021/jo200644t.
- 18.For a review, see Larrosa I, Romea P, Urpi F. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:2683–2723.
- 19.Computations were performed with the Gaussian software package: Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Jr, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox D. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. J Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford CT: 2009.
- 20.Calculations suggest that the reaction does not simply produce the most stable diastereoisomer via thermodynamic equilibration. Using B3LYP/CEP-121G (see Cundari TR, Stevens WJ. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5555–5565.), an energy difference of only 0.3 kcal/mol was found between observed oxa-Michael product 4e and its [H,H]-cis diastereoisomer
- 21.Baldwin JE, Thomas RC, Kruse LI, Silberman L. J Org Chem. 1977;42:3846–3852. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




