Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ISRN Organic Chemistry logoLink to ISRN Organic Chemistry
. 2012 Nov 5;2012:674629. doi: 10.5402/2012/674629

Facile Iodine-Catalyzed Michael Addition of Indoles to α,α′-Bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones: An Efficient Synthesis of E-2-(3-Indolylphenylmethyl)-5-phenylmethylenecyclopentanones

Rammohan Pal 1, Arpita Das Gupta 2, Asok K Mallik 2,*
PMCID: PMC3767326  PMID: 24052849

Abstract

Iodine-catalyzed reaction of indoles with α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones afforded one diastereomer of the corresponding Michael adducts, namely, E-2-(3-indolylphenylmethyl)-5-phenylmethylenecyclopentanones, in a good yield. The products form a new group of indole derivatives.

1. Introduction

The Michael reaction has attracted much attention as one of the most important C–C bond-forming reactions [1, 2]. Indole is a very good Michael donor through its 3-position, and the 3-indolyl system is one of the important building blocks for many biologically active compounds, both natural and unnatural [3]. Traditionally, the Michael addition of indole to α,β-unsaturated ketones as well as addition reactions of indole to other electron deficient olefins is known to be catalyzed by strong bases and Bronsted acids [4–8]. In recent years, it has been reported that these reactions can also be promoted by Lewis acids [9–20]. Following a recent report of iodine-catalyzed Michael addition of indole to some α,β-unsaturated ketones in ethanol [13], we studied the reaction between indole and α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclohexanones under the same condition when we got bis(3-indolyl)methylarenes instead of any conjugate addition product [21]. A survey of the literature revealed that the Michael reaction between indoles and α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones has not been studied so far. We, therefore, carried out this work under the iodine-catalyzed condition and obtained Michael adducts in good yields (Scheme 1). The results of our study are presented herein.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Iodine-catalyzed Michael addition of indoles to α,α′-bis(arylmethylene) cyclopentanones.

2. Results and Discussion

In a preliminary study, α,α′-bis(phenylmethylene)cyclopentanone (1a) was treated with indole (2a) (mole ratio 1 : 1) in the presence of 10 mol% iodine as catalyst in dry dichloromethane at room temperature. The reaction was found to be complete within 4 h affording the conjugate addition product (3a) in 60% yield. The reaction using double the amount of indole also gave the same product in a comparable yield (62%). Encouraged by this result, we carried out the reaction by a variation of conditions, the results of which are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Screening for optimum reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name ISRN.OC2012-674629.tab.001.jpg
Open in a new tab

aConditions: 1a (1 mmol), 2a (1.1 mmol), and solvent (5 mL).

bYield after column chromatography.

It is evident from the results presented in Table 1 that the reaction gave the best yield of the product when dichloromethane was used as solvent and catalyst iodine was used to the extent of 10 mol% (Table 1, Entry 1). When ethanol was used as solvent, the solubility of the substrates at room temperature as well as at the reflux temperature was a problem.

Under the optimized reaction condition, the generality of the process was investigated with a number of α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones (1), and the results are summarized in Table 2. It was noted that 1 with an electron withdrawing or a weakly electron donating group in the phenyl ring underwent facile reaction at room temperature affording the corresponding product within 3-4 h, while 1 with an electron donating group in the phenyl ring failed to undergo any reaction (Table 2, Entries 8 and 9) even at reflux temperature. α,α′-Bis(furfurylidene)cyclopetanone behaved like the latter group of substrates (Table 2, entry 10). Analytical and spectral data of the products definitely showed that they were E-2-(3-indolyl)-2-arylmethyl-5-arylmethylenecyclopentanones (3) (HRMS of 3c is shown in Figure 1). Another interesting point was that no bis(3-indolyl)methylarene formation was observed in this case. The reaction of 1 with one equivalent of 2-methylindole was then studied under similar conditions, which showed that this indole also reacted smoothly giving the corresponding products in a good yield (Table 2, Entries 5–7). Iodine-catalyzed reaction of α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclohexanones with indole/2-methylindole in methylene chloride studied in this connection, however, gave bis(3-indolyl)methylarenes, just like that observed by the use of ethanol as solvent [21].

Table 2.

Results of Michael addition of indoles to α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones catalyzed by iodine.

graphic file with name ISRN.OC2012-674629.tab.002.jpg
Open in a new tab

aYield after column chromatography.

bThe resulting crude material obtained after this time was mainly the starting compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

HRMS of compound 3c.

The Michael addition products 3 contain two adjacent stereogenic centres. It was an interesting observation that out of their two diastereomeric dl-pairs only one was formed. However, the configuration of the diastereomer formed could not be ascertained as none of 3a–g formed good quality crystals from common organic solvents. E-Configuration has been suggested for them by considering that one of the phenylmethylene units of 1 remains completely unchanged during the reaction.

3. Conclusions

We have developed a simple and efficient method for Michael addition of indoles to α,α'-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanones using iodine as catalyst. The method is clean, and the products were obtained in a good yield without the formation of any side product. The Michael addition products 3a–g are new compounds and may have potential biological activities.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. General

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained with a Bruker AV-300 (300 MHz) spectrometer in CDCl3 with TMS as an internal standard. IR spectra were recorded with a Perkin Elmer FT-IR Spectrophotometer (Spectrum BX II) as KBr pellets. Mass Spectra were recorded on Micro Mass Q TOF Spectrometer. Analytical samples were routinely dried invacuo at room temperature. Microanalytical data were recorded on two Perkin-Elmer 2400 Series II C, H, N analyzers. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (100–200 mesh) using petroleum ether (60–80°C) and petroleum ether-ethyl acetate mixtures as eluents. TLC was done with silica gel G. α,α'-Bis(arylmethylene)-cycloalkanones were prepared by previously described methods [22, 23].

4.2. General Procedure

A mixture of an appropriate α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)cyclopentanone (1, 1 mmol) and an indole (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in dry dichloromethane (5 mL) at room temperature, and to the solution under stirring condition iodine (0.025 g, 10 mol%) was added. When the starting materials disappeared almost completely (after 3–5 h, checked by TLC), water (20 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, and it was extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 20 mL). The combined methylene chloride extract was washed with aqueous sodium thiosulphate solution (2 × 25 mL) and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The concentrate of the dichloromethane extract was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (100–200 mesh) using a petroleum ether-ethyl acetate (9 : 1) as an eluent to obtain pure product, which was finally crystallized from chloroform-petroleum ether.

4.3. Physical and Spectral Data of E-2-(3-Indolylphenylmethyl)-5-phenylmethylene-cyclopentanones (3a–g)

4.3.1. E-2-(3-Indolylphenylmethyl)-5-phenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3a)

(Entry 1 in Table 2): White solid; IR (KBr): 3490 (N–H), 2920 (ArC–H), 1701 (C=O), 1625, 1605 (C=C), 1495, 1420, 1240, 1160 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.07 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.93–7.49 (m, 16H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 5.05 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-β), 3.24–3.29 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.69–2.83 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.27–2.30 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.81–1.89 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 207.54 (C=O), 141.67, 136.47, 136.27, 135.58, 132.67, 130.52, 130.39, 129.26, 128.62, 128.06, 129.91, 127.19, 126.34, 122.10, 121.59, 119.89, 119.31, 118.50, 110.92, 52.92 (C-β), 42.06 (C-2), 27.55 (C-4), 24.11 (C-3); Anal. Calcd for C27H23NO: C, 85.91; H, 6.14; N, 3.71; Found C, 85.68; H, 6.21; N, 3.49.

4.3.2. E-2-(3-Indolyl-p-methylphenylmethyl)-5-p-methylphenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3b)

(Entry 2 in Table 2): White solid; IR (KBr): 3380 (N–H), 3000 (ArC–H), 1698 (C=O), 1608, 1590 (C=C), 1496, 1426, 1238, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.93–7.40 (m, 14H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 5.02 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-β,), 3.18–3.22 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.70–2.73 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.22–2.31 (m, 4H, H-3 and CH3), 1.81–1.89 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 207.01 (C=O), 140.50, 136.42, 135.63, 135.33, 132.64, 130.54, 129.35, 129.09, 128.88, 128.70, 128.09, 127.19, 122.93, 121.51, 119.88, 119.18, 117.13, 110.8, 52.98 (C-β), 41.82 (C-2), 27.42 (C-4), 24.42 (C-3), 21.38 (CH3), 20.93 (CH3); Anal. Calcd for C29H27NO: C, 85.89; H, 6.71; N, 3.45; Found C, 85.71; H, 6.53; N, 3.41.

4.3.3. E-2-(3-Indolyl-p-chlorophenylmethyl)-5-p-chlorophenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3c)

(Entry 3 in Table 2): White solid; IR (KBr): 3495 (N–H), 2910 (ArC–H), 1707 (C=O), 1620, 1600 (C=C), 1495, 1460, 1420, 1240, 1160, 1100 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.11 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.95–7.42 (m, 14H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 5.06 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-β), 3.19–3.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.70–2.79 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.30–2.35 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.75–1.83 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 206.91 (C=O), 140.07, 136.46, 136.34, 135.31, 133.88, 132.14, 131.62, 131.57, 130.64, 128.9, 128.20, 126.91, 122.30, 121.53, 119.72, 119.45, 117.89, 110.98, 52.76 (C-β), 41.19 (C-2), 27.45 (C-4), 23.79 (C-3); HRMS observed for (M + Na)+ at 468.0894. Calculated for C27H21NOCl2 [M + Na]+ at 468.0898.

4.3.4. E-2-(3-Indolyl-p-bromophenylmethyl)-5-p-bromophenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3d)

(Entry 4 in Table 2): White solid; IR (KBr): 3371 (N–H), 2955 (ArC–H), 1692 (C=O), 1611, 1583 (C=C), 1487, 1404, 1290, 1152, 1073 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.94–7.53 (m, 14H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 5.05 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-β), 3.19–3.27 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.69–2.77 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.30–2.37 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.57–1.82 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 206.88 (C=O), 140.63, 136.50, 134.33, 131.93, 131.87, 131.67, 131.2, 131.09, 126.93, 123.72, 122.36, 121.57, 120.34, 119.75, 119.52, 117.86111.02, 52.86 (C-β), 41.26 (C-2), 27.36 (C-4), 23.83 (C-3); Anal. Calcd for C27H21NOBr2 (535.27): C, 60.58; H, 3.95; N, 2.62; Found C, 60.43; H, 3.77; N, 2.85.

4.3.5. E-2-[3-(2-Methyl)indolyl-phenylmethyl]-5-phenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3e)

(Entry 5 in Table 2):White solid; IR (KBr): 3401 (N–H), 3024 (ArC–H), 2952, 1705 (C=O), 1622 (C=C), 1459, 1448, 1302, 1187, 741 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.75 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.91–7.62 (m, 15H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 4.85 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz, H-β), 3.52–3.55 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.73–2.78 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.43 (s, 3H, Me), 2.31–2.39 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.85–1.90 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 205.36 (C=O), 140.46, 135.28, 134.90, 132.65, 128.65, 128.49, 127.80, 120.61, 120.39, 118.95, 112.72, 109.95, 53.19 (C-β), 39.86 (C-2), 25.64 (C-4), 20.90 (C-3), 12.48 (Me); Anal. Calcd for C28H25NO (391.50): C, 85.90; H, 6.44; N, 3.58; Found C, 85.68; H, 6.50; N, 3.49.

4.3.6. E-2-[3-(2-Methyl)indolyl-p-methylphenylmethyl]-5-p-methylphenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3f)

(Entry 6 in Table 2): White solid; yield; IR (KBr): 3410 (N–H), 3022 (ArC–H), 2940, 1715 (C=O), 1612 (C=C), 1495, 1430, 1240, 1012, 750 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 6.82–7.25 (m, 13H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 4.88 (d, 1H, J = 4.2 Hz, H-β), 2.78–2.82 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.35 (s, 3H, Me), 2.27–2.31 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.25 (s, 6H, 2Me), 2.13–2.19 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.66–1.70 (m, 1H, H-3); Anal. Calcd for C30H29NO (419.56): C, 85.88; H, 6.97; N, 3.34; Found C, 86.01; H, 7.11; N, 3.29.

4.3.7. E-2-[3-(2-Methyl)indolyl-p-chlorophenylmethyl]-5-p-chlorophenylmethylenecyclopentanone (3g)

(Entry 7 in Table 2): White solid; IR (KBr): 3396 (N–H), 3052 (ArC–H), 2953, 1706 (C=O), 1623 (C=C), 1490, 1459, 1237, 1091, 742 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.78 (br. s, 1H, N–H), 7.17–7.40 (m, 11H, Ar–H and C=C–H), 7.65 (t, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz,), 6.94 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz,), 4.74 (d, 1H, J = 6.6 Hz, H-β), 3.47–3.51 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.42 (s, 3H, Me), 2.70–2.75 (m, 2H, H2-4), 2.26–2.30 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.81–1.85 (m, 1H, H-3); Anal. Calcd for C28H23NCl2O (460.39): C, 73.05; H, 5.04; N, 3.04; Found C, 73.22; H, 4.90; N, 3.17.

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance from the UGC-CAS and DST-PURSE programs, Department of Chemistry, is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the DST-FIST program to the Department of Chemistry, Jadavpur University, for providing the NMR spectral data. A. Das Gupta is thankful to the CSIR, New Delhi, for a Senior Research Fellowship and R. Pal to the UGC, New Delhi for a Minor Research Project, Grant no. PSW-130/11-12 (ERO).

References

  • 1.Trost BM. The atom economy—a search for synthetic efficiency. Science. 1991;254(5037):1471–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1962206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Trost BM. On inventing reactions for atom economy. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2002;35(9):695–705. doi: 10.1021/ar010068z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sundberg RJ. The Chemistry of Indoles. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yamashata H, Mukaiyama T. Asymmetric Michael addition of thiophenol to maleic acid esters. Chemistry Letters. 1985;14(3):363–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu S, Cohen T. The preparation of synthetically useful carbonyl-protected δ- and ε-lithio ketones via reductive lithiation. Tetrahedron. 1997;53(52):17607–17624. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Emori E, Arai T, Sasai H, Shibasaki M. A catalytic Michael addition of thiols to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds: asymmetric Michael additions and asymmetric protonafions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1998;120(16):4043–4044. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.An LT, Zou JP, Zhang LL, Zhang Y. Sulfamic acid-catalyzed Michael addition of indoles and pyrrole to electron-deficient nitroolefins under solvent-free condition. Tetrahedron Letters. 2007;48(24):4297–4300. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sri Hari G, Nagaraju M, Marthanda Murthy M. Silica sulfuric acid-catalyzed Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indoles with nitro olefins. Synthetic Communications. 2008;38(1):100–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olah GA, Krishnamurty R, Prakash GKS. Friedel-Crafts Alkylation. In: Trost BM, Fleming I, editors. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. 1st edition. Vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1991. p. p. 293. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harrington PE, Kerr MA. Reaction of indoles with electron deficient olefins catalyzed by Yb(OTf)3 ·3H2O. Synlett. 1996;1996(11):1047–1048. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yadav JS, Abraham S, Reddy BVS, Sabitha G. InCl3-catalysed conjugate addition of indoles with electron-deficient olefins. Synthesis. 2001;2001(14):2165–2169. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou J, Tang Y. Sidearm effect: improvement of the enantiomeric excess in the asymmetric Michael addition of indoles to alkylidene malonates. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124(31):9030–9031. doi: 10.1021/ja026936k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang S-Y, Ji S-J, Loh T-P. The Michael addition of indole to α,β-unsaturated ketones catalyzed by iodine at room temperature. Synlett. 2003;2003(15):2377–2379. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Komoto I, Kobayashi S. Lewis acid catalysis in supercritical carbon dioxide. Use of poly(ethyleneglycol) derivatives and perfluoroalkylbenzenes as surfactant molecules which enable efficient catalysis in ScCO2 . The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2004;69(3):680–688. doi: 10.1021/jo0353177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhan ZP, Yang RF, Lang K. Samarium triiodide-catalyzed conjugate addition of indoles with electron-deficient olefins. Tetrahedron Letters. 2005;46(22):3859–3862. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Firouzabadi H, Iranpoor N, Nowrouzi F. The facile and efficient Michael addition of indoles and pyrrole to α,β-unsaturated electron-deficient compounds catalyzed by aluminium dodecyl sulfate trihydrate [Al(DS)3]·3H2O in water. Chemical Communications. 2005;(6):789–791. doi: 10.1039/b412653j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jia Y-X, Zhu S-F, Yang Y, Zhou Q-L. Asymmetric Friedel-Crafts alkylations of indoles with nitroalkenes catalyzed by Zn(II)-bisoxazoline complexes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2006;71(1):75–80. doi: 10.1021/jo0516537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bartoli G, di Antonio G, Giuli S, Marcantoni E, Marcolini M, Paoletti M. The CeCl3 ·7H2O/NaI/SiO2 system as an efficient promoter for the Friedel-Crafts reaction of indoles to nitroalkenes under solvent-free conditions. Synthesis. 2008;2008(2):320–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tu Z, Raju BR, Liou TR, et al. An efficient method for the synthesis of α-arylated nitroalkanes and α-arylated hydroximoyl chlorides mediated by AlCl3 . Tetrahedron. 2009;65(12):2436–2442. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ji X, Tong H, Yuan Y. Facile and efficient Michael addition of indole to nitroolefins catalyzed by Zn(OAc)2 ·2H2O. Synthetic Communications. 2011;41(3):372–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mallik AK, Pal R, Mandal TK. Facile formation of bis(3-indolyl)methylarenes by iodine-catalyzed reaction of indole with α,α′-bis(arylmethylene)ketones and α-substituted arylmethyleneketones in dry ethanol. Indian Journal of Chemistry B. 2007;46(12):2056–2059. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pal R, Mandal TK, Samanta S, Mallik AK. An efficient synthesis of E-2-amino-4-aryl-8-(arylmethylene)-5,6,7,8- tetrahydrobenzo[d]pyrimidines and their lower analogues. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. 2010;87(6):711–715. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pal R, Mandal TK, Guha C, Mallik AK. Amberlyst-15 catalysed microwave assisted cross-aldol condensation between ketones and aldehydes under solvent free condition. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. 2011;88(5):711–717. [Google Scholar]

Articles from ISRN Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES