Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2013 Aug 20;110(36):14765–14770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314137110

NR2B subunit of the NMDA glutamate receptor regulates appetite in the parabrachial nucleus

Qi Wu a,b,c,d,1, Ruimao Zheng e,1, Dollada Srisai c,d, G Stanley McKnight e, Richard D Palmiter a,b,2
PMCID: PMC3767546  PMID: 23964123

Significance

Nausea, which can be induced by injecting LiCl i.p. in rodents, activates a neural circuit (vagus → nucleus tractus solitarius → parabrachial nucleus) that promotes severe anorexia. Ablation of orexigenic neurons in the hypothalamus that express agouti-related protein (AgRP) also activates this anorexia pathway and leads to starvation. Here we show that pretreatment of mice with LiCl prevents starvation after ablation of AgRP-expressing neurons. The mechanism of protection involves suppression of the increase in the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor in the parabrachial nucleus that occurs after AgRP neuron ablation. We suggest that preactivation of the nausea circuit promotes synaptic changes that compensate for the loss of the input from AgRP-expressing neurons and thereby prevents starvation.

Keywords: feeding behavior, nausea, NR2B signaling

Abstract

Diphtheria toxin-mediated, acute ablation of hypothalamic neurons expressing agouti-related protein (AgRP) in adult mice leads to anorexia and starvation within 7 d that is caused by hyperactivity of neurons within the parabrachial nucleus (PBN). Because NMDA glutamate receptors are involved in various synaptic plasticity-based behavioral modifications, we hypothesized that modulation of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor in PBN neurons could contribute to the anorexia phenotype. We observed by Western blot analyses that ablation of AgRP neurons results in enhanced expression of NR2B along with a modest suppression of NR2A. Interestingly, systemic administration of LiCl in a critical time window before AgRP neuron ablation abolished the anorectic response. LiCl treatment suppressed NR2B levels in the PBN and ameliorated the local Fos induction that is associated with anorexia. This protective role of LiCl on feeding was blunted in vagotomized mice. Chronic infusion of RO25-6981, a selective NR2B inhibitor, into the PBN recapitulated the role of LiCl in maintaining feeding after AgRP neuron ablation. We suggest that the accumulation of NR2B subunits in the PBN contributes to aphagia in response to AgRP neuron ablation and may be involved in other forms of anorexia.


NMDA receptors form glutamate-gated ion channels that mediate many forms of synaptic plasticity under physiological conditions and neuronal death under excitotoxic pathological conditions (1, 2). NMDA receptors are tetrameric complexes composed of two obligatory NR1 subunits and two regulatory NR2 and/or NR3 subunits. Multiple subtypes of NMDA receptors are identified with distinct pharmacological and biophysical properties that are predominantly determined by the type of NR2 subunit (NR2A to NR2D). NR2A and NR2B subunits are the most abundant subunits in the adult brain and differ in channel properties, synaptic localization, and protein interaction elements, all of which can contribute to the induction of synaptic plasticity (3). Some recent studies suggest that NMDA receptors play a major role in regulating feeding behavior and energy homeostasis. For example, antagonism of hindbrain NMDA receptors increases food intake, whereas activation of NMDA receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) is necessary for cholecystokinin-induced reduction of food intake (4, 5). Injection of NMDA receptor agonists into the lateral hypothalamus elicits feeding in satiated animals, whereas NMDA blockade suppresses food intake and can reduce body weight (6). Genetic inactivation of NR1 subunits specifically in agouti-related protein (AgRP) neurons results in marked loss of food intake and body fat and impaired feeding after a fast (7). These findings implicate NMDA receptor signaling within several neuronal circuits in the control of feeding and energy balance.

Emerging evidence suggests that a complex neural network including GABAergic AgRP neurons in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus plays a pivotal role in the control of appetite and energy metabolism (810). Activation of AgRP neurons promotes food intake and body weight gain by inhibiting postsynaptic target neurons in the paraventricular hypothalamus (10). Ablation of AgRP neurons by administration of diphtheria toxin (DT) to mice that express the diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) selectively in AgRP neurons (AgrpDTR mice) results in aphagia and a fatal loss of body weight caused by the hyperactivity of postsynaptic neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) as a consequence of losing inhibitory GABAergic signals (1113). This anorexic response can be prevented by benzodiazepine potentiation of GABA signaling, by genetic blockade of NMDA glutamate receptor signaling in the PBN, or by reducing glutamatergic input or output from the PBN, including knockdown of NMDA expression in the PBN (14). However, the physiological roles of NMDA receptors in the PBN in modulating appetitive behavior have not been identified.

We explored the potential benefit of pretreatment with LiCl because this salt has been shown to affect the activity of the PBN and to modulate NMDA receptor functions. Lithium is commonly used to treat bipolar mood disorder, but it also can elicit robust neuroprotection against excitotoxicity in CNS neurons (15, 16). Long-term exposure to LiCl protects cultured cerebellar, cortical, and hippocampal neurons against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity; this protection can be attributed, in part, to the inhibition of NMDA receptor-mediated calcium influx (17). Significant weight gain is associated with prolonged lithium therapy in patients with bipolar disorder; these patients have enhanced preference for a high-calorie diet, but the mechanism(s) causing this metabolic effect are unknown (18). It is well documented that a single i.p. dose of LiCl produces gastrointestinal malaise that is coincident with the induction of Fos in certain brainstem structures, including the NTS and the PBN (19, 20). Exposure of rodents to a novel taste followed by LiCl treatment produces robust conditioned aversion to that taste, and electrolytic lesions of the PBN prevent LiCl-mediated conditioned taste aversion (21). These results are consistent with the idea that LiCl activates vagal afferents to the NTS, which then relays an excitatory, glutamatergic signal to the PBN where it induces Fos in a subpopulation of PBN neurons. We hypothesized that robust glutamatergic signaling induced in the PBN by LiCl treatment might lead to synaptic plasticity involving NMDA receptors and that these changes might influence the anorexia phenotype associated with the sudden loss of GABAergic input to the PBN from AgRP neurons.

Results

LiCl Pretreatment Prevents Severe Aphagia Caused by AgRP Neuron Ablation.

Because prolonged activation of excitatory neurons leads to adaptive desensitization in certain types of hippocampal and cortex neurons (2226), we hypothesized that recurrent treatment with LiCl might dampen the excitability of glutamatergic neurons in the PBN when GABAergic input from AgRP neurons is abolished and thereby protect against aphagia. To test this hypothesis, AgrpDTR/+ and wild-type (C57BL/6) mice were treated i.p. with saline or LiCl (0.25 M, 10 µL⋅g−1⋅d−1) for four consecutive days. DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons was initiated 24 h after termination of the LiCl treatment. Daily administration of LiCl had little effect on food intake and body weight except for a small and transient loss of appetite after the first few injections. (Fig. 1). Remarkably, LiCl pretreatment prevented the severe aphagia and weight loss associated with DT treatment of AgrpDTR/+ mice, whereas the mice treated with normal saline stopped eating by day 7 (Fig. 1). Treatment of wild-type mice with LiCl and DT had little effect on body weight, but food intake was reduced during the first few days.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prolonged administration of LiCl prevents aphagia in AgRP neuron-ablated mice. (A) Body weight of AgrpDTR/+ mice and wild-type (BL6) mice after 4 d of saline or LiCl treatment (0.25 M, 10 µL⋅g−1⋅d−1, i.p.; n = 8 per group). DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons was initiated 1 d after LiCl treatment was terminated, and DT was administered i.m. twice as indicated by arrows. (B) Daily food intake was measured for the groups of mice described in A. *P < 0.05 between AgrpDTR/+ mice treated with LiCl and AgrpDTR/+ mice treated with saline for both body weight and food intake; two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA. Results are shown as means ± SEM.

To understand better the conditions in which LiCl treatment was able to maintain feeding, we examined different time windows of LiCl treatment before ablation of AgRP neurons. In contrast to the previous experiment in which DT was given 1 d after LiCl treatment ceased, DT injection was initiated 2 or 3 d after the last of four daily LiCl treatments. We found that the efficacy of LiCl against starvation was still intact when ablation of AgRP neurons was initiated 2 d after termination of the LiCl treatment (Fig. 2). However, the protective effect of LiCl was abolished in the mice in which DT was administered 3 d after LiCl treatment (Fig. 2). These experiments demonstrate that the protective effect of LiCl treatment lasts for 2 d and then dissipates.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The effect of LiCl treatment on restoration of appetite in AgRP neuron-ablated mice is transient. (A) Body weight of AgrpDTR/+ mice after 4 d of saline or LiCl treatment (0.25 M, 10 µL⋅g−1⋅d−1, i.p.; n = 6–8 per group). Injection of DT was initiated either 2 d (red line A and green line C traces) or 3 d (purple line B trace) after LiCl treatment was terminated. (B) Daily food intake was measured for the groups of mice described in A. Two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA revealed (i) no effect of LiCl treatment on either body weight or food intake from day −7 to day 0; (ii) a significant effect on both body weight and food intake at days 1–7 in saline-treated and LiCl-treated groups with a 2-d delay before DT treatment (*P < 0.05); and (iii) a significant effect of LiCl on both body weight and food intake from days 1–10 after 2-d vs. 3-d delay in DT treatment (*P < 0.05). Results are shown as means ± SEM.

Pretreatment with LiCl Reduces Fos Induction in the PBN After Ablation of AgRP Neurons.

LiCl treatment has been shown to induce neuronal excitability and subsequent adaptation in the hippocampal and cortical neurons (2729). We therefore speculated that LiCl-mediated activation of PBN neurons might promote a reversible adaptation in the feeding circuitry to compensate for the sudden loss of inhibitory input from AgRP neurons. Loss of AgRP neurons results in Fos induction in the same region of the PBN where Fos induction occurs after a single injection of LiCl (Fig. 3 A and B), in agreement with previous results (13). However, the Fos signal in the PBN neurons was reduced dramatically in AgrpDTR/+ mice to which LiCl had been administered previously for four consecutive days (Fig. 3C), and Fos was maintained at baseline level when AgRP neurons subsequently were killed by DT treatment (Fig. 3D). These results (quantified in Fig. 3E) suggest that PBN neurons adapt to repeated exposure to i.p. LiCl treatments so that they no longer are excited by loss of GABA signaling from AgRP neurons.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Prolonged treatment with LiCl prevents Fos activation in the lateral PBN after ablation of AgRP neurons. (AD) Representative immunohistochemistry images of Fos in neurons from the lateral PBN of AgrpDTR/+ mice (A) 6 d after DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons; (B) 2 h after acute LiCl treatment; (C) 4 d after prolonged treatment of LiCl (tissues were collected 2 h after the last LiCl treatment); and (D) 4 d of LiCl treatment followed by DT administration (tissues were collected 6 d after the initiation of DT treatment). (E) Quantified immunoreactivity of Fos+ neurons in the lateral PBN after each of the four treatments. *P < 0.01, (ANOVA); n = 6 mice per group. Results are shown as means ± SEM.

To ascertain whether LiCl exerts its effect on feeding through direct modulation of neuronal activity in the PBN, osmotic minipumps were used to infuse LiCl chronically either into the fourth ventricle or directly into the PBN before AgrpDTR/+ mice were treated with DT. We found that central administration of LiCl by either route failed to protect against the starvation phenotype regardless of the dose (Fig. S1). Because LiCl promotes the formation of conditioned taste aversion and elevates Fos activity in the NTS and PBN by activating vagus nerves (30, 31), we examined the effect of gastric vagotomy on LiCl-induced protection. The protective role of LiCl on feeding and body weight of AgRP-ablated mice was abolished completely in vagotomized mice as compared with controls treated with sham surgery (Fig. S2). These results suggest that LiCl exerts its protective effect on the PBN by activating vagal afferents to the NTS which then are relayed to the PBN (14).

LiCl Pretreatment Prevents Changes in NMDA Receptor Subunit Abundance.

Our previous experiments implicated glutamate signaling onto NMDA receptors of PBN neurons as the source of excitation that results in Fos induction and aphagia (14). We hypothesized that acute ablation of AgRP neurons, which could result in a homeostatic increase of PBN excitation, might trigger compensatory changes in the expression profile of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor. We measured both total and phosphorylated (activated) forms of NR2A and NR2B subunits from the PBN during the 6-d period after DT treatment of AgrpDTR/+ mice by Western blot from tissue punches centered on the PBN. We chose antibodies against specific tyrosine residues in NR2A [phosphorylated NR2A (pNR2A), Tyr1325] and NR2B [phosphorylated NR2B (pNR2B), Tyr1742] that are most relevant to synaptic modulation of neuronal excitability and neuroprotection (32, 33). The total NR2A and pNR2A in the PBN were largely insensitive to the ablation of AgRP neurons (Fig. 4A), whereas both total NR2B and pNR2B showed progressive elevation after AgrpDTR/+ mice were treated with DT (Fig. 4B). Both NR2B and pNR2B reached their peak levels (approximately twofold higher than baseline) on the fifth day after DT treatment. Immunostaining results also indicated a significant increase in NR2B expression in the PBN 5 d after the ablation of AgRP neurons (Fig. S3). There were no changes in NR2B levels in the periaqueductal gray region of the brain, another target of AgRP neurons. These results suggest that NR2B signaling in the PBN is potentiated upon removal of GABAergic input from AgRP neurons and might promote anorexia. In a control experiment in which naive AgrpDTR/+ mice and DT-treated AgrpDTR/+ mice were pair-fed, the level of total NR2B and pNR2B in the PBN neurons remained unchanged (Fig. 4D). However, the total and pNR2A displayed a transient but significant reduction during the first 3 d in response to pair-feeding (Fig. 4C). This decrease in NR2A might reflect an adaptation to starvation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The NR2B subunit is up-regulated in the PBN neurons after acute ablation of AgRP neurons. (A and C) Western blot analysis showing the progressive change in the relative abundance of total NR2A and pNR2A (Tyr1325) in the PBN of AgrpDTR/+ mice after DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons (A) and after pair-feeding (PF) (C). (B and D) Western blot analysis showing the relative abundance of total NR2B and phosphorylated NR2B (Tyr1742) in the PBN of AgrpDTR/+ mice after DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons (B) and after pair-feeding (PF) (D). *P < 0.01; ANOVA; n = 5 or 6 mice per group. In all Western blots, β-actin serves as the control. Results are shown as means ± SEM. DT0–DT6, days of DT treatment; PF0–PF6, days of pair-feeding matched to that consumed by the DT-treated group.

To establish further the relationship between NMDA receptor signaling and appetitive behavior in the AgRP neuron-ablated mice, we examined the level of total NR2A and NR2B in the PBN after chronic infusion of bretazenil (a GABAA receptor agonist) into the PBN, a procedure that prevents severe aphagia and allows the mice to recover normal feeding (13). Western blot data revealed that chronic treatment with bretazenil modestly reduced NR2B expression compared with a group of mice treated with DT alone (Fig. 5). Four days of treatment with LiCl significantly reduced NR2B levels and modestly enhanced NR2A abundance compared with that in naive mice (Fig. 5). Furthermore, pretreatment with LiCl for 4 d completely prevented the enhanced expression of NR2B that occurs after DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons (Fig. 5). Immunostaining results indicated that the accumulation of NR2B subunits after ablation of AgRP neurons was colocalized to a large extent with Fos signals in PBN neurons (Fig. S3). Taken together with the previous time-course study, these results suggest that enhanced NR2B signaling in the PBN is tightly associated with the anorexic phenotype in this AgRP neuron-ablation model.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The abundance NR2B in the PBN is attenuated after chronic administration of bretazenil or prolonged treatment with LiCl. Western blot analysis showed the relative abundance of total NR2A and NR2B in the PBN neurons of naive AgrpDTR/+ mice (naive); pair-fed naive mice (PF) and DT-treated AgrpDTR/+ mice (DT); DT-treated AgrpDTR/+ mice treated with chronic infusion of bretazenil (0.3 mg/mL) into the fourth ventricle (BTZ + DT); AgrpDTR/+ mice with prolonged treatment of LiCl [LiCl (4×)]; and AgrpDTR/+ mice with prolonged treatment of LiCl followed by DT [LiCl (4×) + DT]. β-Actin served as the control. *P < 0.01, ANOVA; n = 6–10 mice per group. Results are shown as means ± SEM. Tissue was collected 5 d after initiation of treatment for PF, DT, LiCl (4×) groups; 10 d after initiation of treatment for LiCl (4×)+DT group (5 d after DT); and 14 d after initiation of treatment for BTZ+DT group, i.e. when feeding had been restored.

Pharmacological Suppression of NR2B Activity Protects Against Aphagia After AgRP Neuron Ablation.

To determine the functional contribution of NR2B signaling in the PBN to appetitive behavior, a selective NR2B antagonist, RO25-6981, was infused bilaterally into the PBN via a 14-d osmotic minipump starting 5 d before the ablation of AgRP neurons (34). We observed a dose-dependent amelioration of the aphagia phenotype; the highest dose completely protected against aphagia and loss of body weight (Fig. 6). Interestingly, infusion of RO25-6981 into the PBN caused significant enhancement of daily food intake and body weight gain during the first 5 d of minipump treatment in naive AgrpDTR/+ mice (Fig. 6). Moreover, the appetitive behavior was rescued completely in AgRP neuron-ablated mice when the NR2B antagonist and the GABAA receptor agonist were infused simultaneously into the PBN at doses that by themselves would maintain appetite only partially (Fig. 6). Coordinates for histological sites receiving NR2B antagonist and/or bretazenil infusion into the PBN are illustrated in Fig. S4. These results indicate that blockade of NR2B signaling in the PBN is sufficient to prevent anorexic response when AgRP neurons are ablated in adult mice.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Chronic administration of the NR2B subtype-selective antagonist RO25-6981 (RO) into the PBN area prevents aphagia in AgRP neuron-ablated mice. (A) Body weight of AgrpDTR/+ mice after chronic infusion of RO25-6981 or vehicle bilaterally into the PBN (n = 14 per group). DT-mediated ablation of AgRP neurons was initiated 6 d after implantation of minipumps loaded with various doses of RO25-6981 and/or bretazenil (BTZ). (B) Daily food intake was measured for the groups of mice described in A. *P < 0.01; two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA between each of the RO25-6981-treated groups and the vehicle-treated group during days 3–7; n = 6–8 mice per group. Results are shown as means ± SEM.

Discussion

Our experiments reveal that pretreatment with LiCl prevented the hyperactivity of postsynaptic neurons in the PBN after acute ablation of inhibitory AgRP neurons, thereby maintaining normal food intake and body weight. The mechanism underlying the role of LiCl on the PBN was linked to NMDA receptor signaling. It has been suggested that chronic treatment of LiCl protects against excitotoxicity in cortical neurons by selective inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation in the NMDA receptor NR2B subunits (33). However, we observed a significant reduction of total NR2B in the PBN when LiCl was administered systemically. Consistent with the findings that prolonged activation of excitatory neurons leads to adaptive desensitization, our data suggest that peripheral administration of LiCl, by acting through vagal afferents, modulates total NR2B expression within PBN neurons, in turn leading to the suppression of neuronal excitability. Preventing excessive signaling by NR2B-containing NMDA receptors, either by preventing their accumulation or by inhibiting their activity with an antagonist, protects against the hyperactivity and aphagia that otherwise would ensue following ablation of AgRP neurons.

The neurons in the PBN that become Fos+ after treatment with LiCl or after ablation of AgRP neurons reside in the external lateral region of the PBN. This region includes neurons that express calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP) and project to the lateral capsule of the amygdala. Photoactivation of those neurons with channel rhodopsin or pharmacological activation of the HM3q DREADD receptor in those neurons is sufficient to inhibit food intake in a transient or tonic manner, respectively (35). We anticipate that the NR2B subunits accumulate primarily in the CGRP neurons in the external lateral region of the PBN because we observe accumulation of NR2B in Fos+ neurons in that brain region. Future studies need to examine the extent of NMDA receptor changes in CGRP-expressing neurons by cell-specific biochemical and electrophysiological methods.

The accumulation of NR2B subunits after the loss of AgRP neurons seems maladaptive, because we would expect homeostatic mechanisms to be engaged that would reduce neuronal excitability after loss of GABA signaling from AgRP neurons. Perhaps the induction of NR2B is not an adaptive mechanism but rather is a response to the degeneration of AgRP neuron axon terminals. We showed previously that both microglia and astrocytes are activated in postsynaptic target regions after ablation of AgRP neurons (12). Those activated glial cells release cytokines (such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) that affect the expression of NMDA receptor subunits in other systems (3638). We have shown that mice eventually adapt to the loss of AgRP neurons, but the adaptation process takes about 10 d, during which time glial activation may subside. In this scenario, intervention either by pretreatment with LiCl or by administering the NR2B antagonist during the ablation period prevents the induction of the maladaptive phenotype that is induced by loss of AgRP axon terminals in the PBN.

Methods

Mice.

Male mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled facility with a 12-h light/dark cycle. All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Washington and the University of Iowa. In compliance with our approved protocol, all experiments were terminated if the body weight of mice fell to 80% of their original body weight. AgrpDTR/+ mice were generated by targeting the human diphtheria toxin receptor (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor) to the Agrp locus (11). Mice were group housed with standard chow diet (Lab-Diet 5053) and water provided ad libitum until the beginning of the experiments.

Subdiaphragmatic Gastric Vagotomy.

The mice were deeply anesthetized by i.p. injection of ketamine and xylazine. After s.c. injection of buprenorphine, a 12-mm midline incision was made posterior to the xiphisternum; the left and right vagus nerves were located on the lateral border of the abdominal esophagus and were separated from the surrounding peritoneal tissue, and gastric nerve trunks (∼10 mm long) were cut under a dissecting microscope. The abdominal wall and skin were closed with sterile nylon suture; the skin suture was removed 10 d after the surgery. Subdiaphragmatic gastric vagotomy results in dilated gastric ventricles, which were obvious in vagotomized mice but not in sham-operated mice.

Food Intake and Body Weight Measurements.

For feeding assays, mice were transferred to BioDAQ Food and Water Intake Monitor (Research Diets) and were supplied with water and low-fat (3.85 kcal/mL) chow diet (D12450B; Research Diets). The mice were allowed to acclimate for 3 d before the initiation of each experiment and data collection. Body weight and total food intake were recorded every 24 h. Feeding and drinking activity was recorded in accordance with the manufacturer’s suggested protocol.

Pharmacological Treatments.

To ablate AgRP neurons in adult mice, we administered two i.m. injections of DT (50 mg/kg; List Biological Laboratories) 2 d apart to 6-wk-old mice (11). For systemic treatment, LiCl (0.25 M, 10 µL⋅g−1⋅d−1; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in distilled water before i.p. injection. For central administration, Alzet 14-d minipumps (model 1002; Durect) loaded with 100 µL of LiCl, RO25-6981 (Sigma-Aldrich), or a mixture of RO25-6981 and bretazenil (Sigma-Aldrich) were implanted s.c. on the back of anesthetized mice 4 d before DT treatment. Surgical procedures of cannulation into fourth ventricle or bilaterally into the PBN followed published protocols (13). The patency and placement of the bilateral minipump were verified at the end of each experiment when brain samples were processed for immunohistological analysis.

Immunohistochemistry.

On day 6 after DT injection, deeply anesthetized animals were perfused intracardially by ice-cold PBS followed by 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde. Whole brain was dissected out and fixed overnight in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde before being moved to 30% sucrose where it was maintained until it sank. Then 25-μm frozen sections were cut by cryostat. The sections were incubated in 0.3% H2O2 for 20 min and then were washed twice with TBS-0.05% Tween 20 (TBST). The sections were incubated for 30 min in blocking buffer containing 0.1 M Tris⋅HCL (pH7.5), 0.15 M NaCl with 0.5% blocking reagent from the Cy3 Tyramide signal amplification system (PerkinElmer) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Rabbit anti-NR2B antibody (EMD Millipore) was diluted at 1:500 in blocking buffer, and sections were incubated in this antibody overnight at 4 °C. The sections were washed three times in TBST at room temperature and were incubated in HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG for 40 min. The sections were washed three times with TBST and incubated in fluorophore tyramide for 3 min at room temperature before being washed three times again in TBST. Before treatment with the Fos antibody, the sections were incubated in 25 mM glycine, 10% (wt/vol) SDS, pH 2 for 30 min at 50 °C to elute the primary NR2B antibody. The sections were washed by TBS twice before being incubated in blocking solution [4% (vol/vol) normal donkey serum in TBST] for 1 h on a shaker. The sections were incubated in the primary antibody, anti-Fos antibody (PC38, EMD Millipore) at a dilution of 1:1,000 in blocking solution at 4 °C overnight. The sections were washed three times with TBST before being incubated in the secondary antibody, 1:400 Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were washed five times with TBST and were mounted on glass slides and covered with anti-fade mounting medium. Sections incubated without a primary antibody were used as negative control.

Western Blot Analysis.

Tissue micropunches of 1-mm diameter (Fine Science Tools GmbH) including the PBN (39) were obtained bilaterally from 1-mm- thick coronal sections using a stainless steel mouse brain matrix (Harvard Apparatus), were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and were kept at −80 °C until further processing. Coordinates of collected brain regions were based on the Paxinos Mouse Brain Atlas (40). Samples were homogenized and sonicated separately in ice-cold RIPA buffer (41) supplemented with protease inhibitors (P8340; Sigma) and phosphatase inhibitor mixture-3 (P0044; Sigma) and then were cleared by centrifugation (4 °C, 10,000 × g; 20 min). Protein quantification was performed with the BCA assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Pierce). Protein samples (5 μg) of each brain region in SDS loading buffer were electrophoresed on 8% (wt/vol) SDS/PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). Membranes were blocked with 5% (wt/vol) BSA in TBST for 2 h at room temperature and then were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. The primary antibodies and dilutions were anti-NR2B, 1:500 (610417; BD Transduction Laboratories); anti-NR2A, 1:1,000 (612286; BD Transduction Laboratories); anti–phospho-NR2A, 1:1,000 (ab16646; Abcam); anti–phospho-NR2B, 1:1,000 (M2442; Sigma); and anti–β-actin antibody, 1:5,000 (Sigma; A5316). Then the blots were washed at least five times in TBST for 5 min each washing at room temperature. HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) was applied at a 1:10,000 dilution in TBST plus 5% (wt/vol) BSA and was incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After the blots were washed five times for 5 min each washing, they were developed with an ECL assay kit (SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, 34087 or SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate, 34076; Thermo Scientific, Pierce) and were analyzed with a Kodak Digital Imaging System. Protein levels were expressed as ratios of the signal densities, and β-actin was used as a control for variations in protein loading.

Statistical Analyses.

Quantification of Fos+ cells was done using the NIH Image software (National Institutes of Health). From the anatomically matched sections of controls, a region of interest of the same size was defined. Meanwhile, an optimized threshold that can distinguish round Fos+ nuclei from partially stained ones and from background noise was preset for all measurements. The total number of pixels of Fos+ cells inside the defined region was recorded automatically. Unless otherwise stated, datasets collected from all experiments were analyzed by two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls method for statistical significance and plotted as means ± SEM. Post hoc analysis was performed when group differences were significant by ANOVA at P < 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Matt Carter, Carolyn Roman, and Victor Derkach for constructive comments during the execution of these experiments and in the preparation of the manuscript and Dr. Yin Liu for help with quantitative analysis of Western blot data. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01DA24908 and R01GM032875.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1314137110/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Paoletti P, Neyton J. NMDA receptor subunits: Function and pharmacology. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2007;7(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Traynelis SF, et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: Structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62(3):405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yashiro K, Philpot BD. Regulation of NMDA receptor subunit expression and its implications for LTD, LTP, and metaplasticity. Neuropharmacology. 2008;55(7):1081–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hung CY, Covasa M, Ritter RC, Burns GA. Hindbrain administration of NMDA receptor antagonist AP-5 increases food intake in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;290(3):R642–R651. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00641.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burns GA, Ritter RC. The non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 increases food intake in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;56(1):145–149. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00171-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stanley BG, Urstadt KR, Charles JR, Kee T. Glutamate and GABA in lateral hypothalamic mechanisms controlling food intake. Physiol Behav. 2011;104(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu T, et al. Fasting activation of AgRP neurons requires NMDA receptors and involves spinogenesis and increased excitatory tone. Neuron. 2012;73(3):511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu Q, Palmiter RD. GABAergic signaling by AgRP neurons prevents anorexia via a melanocortin-independent mechanism. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;660(1):21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morton GJ, Cummings DE, Baskin DG, Barsh GS, Schwartz MW. Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight. Nature. 2006;443(7109):289–295. doi: 10.1038/nature05026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sternson SM. Hypothalamic survival circuits: Blueprints for purposive behaviors. Neuron. 2013;77(5):810–824. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luquet S, Perez FA, Hnasko TS, Palmiter RD. NPY/AgRP neurons are essential for feeding in adult mice but can be ablated in neonates. Science. 2005;310(5748):683–685. doi: 10.1126/science.1115524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu Q, Howell MP, Palmiter RD. Ablation of neurons expressing agouti-related protein activates fos and gliosis in postsynaptic target regions. J Neurosci. 2008;28(37):9218–9226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2449-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu Q, Boyle MP, Palmiter RD. Loss of GABAergic signaling by AgRP neurons to the parabrachial nucleus leads to starvation. Cell. 2009;137(7):1225–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Q, Clark MS, Palmiter RD. Deciphering a neuronal circuit that mediates appetite. Nature. 2012;483(7391):594–597. doi: 10.1038/nature10899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chuang DM. The antiapoptotic actions of mood stabilizers: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1053:195–204. doi: 10.1196/annals.1344.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schloesser RJ, Huang J, Klein PS, Manji HK. Cellular plasticity cascades in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):110–133. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nonaka S, Hough CJ, Chuang DM. Chronic lithium treatment robustly protects neurons in the central nervous system against excitotoxicity by inhibiting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated calcium influx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(5):2642–2647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Livingstone C, Rampes H. Lithium: A review of its metabolic adverse effects. J Psychopharmacol. 2006;20(3):347–355. doi: 10.1177/0269881105057515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lamprecht R, Dudai Y. Differential modulation of brain immediate early genes by intraperitoneal LiCl. Neuroreport. 1995;7(1):289–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Swank MW, Bernstein IL. c-Fos induction in response to a conditioned stimulus after single trial taste aversion learning. Brain Res. 1994;636(2):202–208. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spector AC, Norgren R, Grill HJ. Parabrachial gustatory lesions impair taste aversion learning in rats. Behav Neurosci. 1992;106(1):147–161. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goel A, Buonomano DV. Chronic electrical stimulation homeostatically decreases spontaneous activity, but paradoxically increases evoked network activity. J Neurophysiol. 2013;109(7):1824–1836. doi: 10.1152/jn.00612.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goold CP, Nicoll RA. Single-cell optogenetic excitation drives homeostatic synaptic depression. Neuron. 2010;68(3):512–528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: The plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19(4):126–130. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80018-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Turrigiano G. Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: Local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(1):a005736. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zorumski CF, Izumi Y. NMDA receptors and metaplasticity: Mechanisms and possible roles in neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(3):989–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yasoshima Y, Yamamoto T. Short-term and long-term excitability changes of the insular cortical neurons after the acquisition of taste aversion learning in behaving rats. Neuroscience. 1998;84(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00636-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lacaille JC, Cloutier S, Reader TA. Lithium reduced synaptic transmission and increased neuronal excitability without altering endogenous serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1992;16(3):397–412. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(92)90091-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Butler-Munro C, Coddington EJ, Shirley CH, Heyward PM. Lithium modulates cortical excitability in vitro. Brain Res. 2010;1352:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Niijima A, Yamamoto T. The effects of lithium chloride on the activity of the afferent nerve fibers from the abdominal visceral organs in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 1994;35(2):141–145. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamamoto T, et al. C-fos expression in the rat brain after intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride. Neuroreport. 1992;3(12):1049–1052. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199212000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Taniguchi S, et al. Involvement of NMDAR2A tyrosine phosphorylation in depression-related behaviour. EMBO J. 2009;28(23):3717–3729. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hashimoto R, Hough C, Nakazawa T, Yamamoto T, Chuang DM. Lithium protection against glutamate excitotoxicity in rat cerebral cortical neurons: Involvement of NMDA receptor inhibition possibly by decreasing NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation. J Neurochem. 2002;80(4):589–597. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Y, et al. NMDA receptor subunits have differential roles in mediating excitotoxic neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci. 2007;27(11):2846–2857. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0116-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carter ME, Soden ME, Zweifel LS, Palmiter RD. Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite. Nature. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nature12596. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rai S, Kamat PK, Nath C, Shukla R. A study on neuroinflammation and NMDA receptor function in STZ (ICV) induced memory impaired rats. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;254(1-2):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jing T, et al. Soluble factors from IL-1β-stimulated astrocytes activate NR1a/NR2B receptors: Implications for HIV-1-induced neurodegeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;402(2):241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lundborg C, Westerlund A, Björklund U, Biber B, Hansson E. Ifenprodil restores GDNF-evoked Ca(2+) signalling and Na(+)/K(+) -ATPase expression in inflammation-pretreated astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2011;119(4):686–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Palkovits M. Isolated removal of hypothalamic or other brain nuclei of the rat. Brain Res. 1973;59:449–450. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90290-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic; 2004. Compact 2nd Ed. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yin X, Feng X, Takei Y, Hirokawa N. Regulation of NMDA receptor transport: A KIF17-cargo binding/releasing underlies synaptic plasticity and memory in vivo. J Neurosci. 2012;32(16):5486–5499. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0718-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES