Abstract
The enantiodivergent hydroboration reactions of racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH and subsequent crotylboration of achiral aldehydes with the product crotylborane (S)-E-5 at −78 °C provide (E)-δ-silyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 6 in 71–89% yield and with 93–96% ee. Intriguingly, mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reactions of enantioenriched chiral aldehydes 20 with (S)-E-5 proceed under Curtin-Hammett control to give anti-3-hydroxylcrotylsilanes 24 as the only products.
Keywords: Enantiodivergent hydroboration, Mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration, Curtin-Hammett control
1. Introduction
The asymmetric crotylation reaction of carbonyl compounds is one of the most widely utilized methods to synthesize stereochemically defined acyclic molecules.1 However, for many synthetic applications the terminal vinyl groups embedded in the homoallylic alcohol products must be transformed into other functional groups via several step reaction sequences. Carbonyl crotylation with α-functionalized allylmetal reagents (specifically, non-racemic α –substituted allylmetal reagents) provide homoallylic alcohols with a functionalized olefin unit, however the preparation of such reagents, in particular enantioenriched α –substituted crotylmetal reagents, remains largely underdeveloped.2 Therefore, development of enantioselective methods for the synthesis of chiral, non-racemic α-functionalized allylmetal reagents remains an important objective in methodology development.
We envisioned that allene hydroboration reactions with chiral borane reagents could provide an exceedingly simple means to access chiral, non-racemic α-functionalized allylborane reagents.3 Several chiral, non-racemic crotylboranes have been developed recently in our laboratory by using this strategy.4 For example, as shown in Scheme 1, the enantioselective hydroboration of racemic allenylstannane (±)-1 with (ddiisopinocampheyl)borane [(dIpc)2BH] provides the enantioenriched α –tributylstannyl crotylborane, (S)-E-2. Subsequent crotylboration reactions of aldehydes with (S)-E-2 gives (E)-δ-stannyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 3 in good yields and with excellent enantioselectivity.4a The vinylstannane unit in homoallylic alcohols 3 can be used in a variety of subsequent transformations.5 Importantly, the enantioselective hydroboration of allenylstannane (±)-1 proceeds in an enantioconvergent manner, with both enantiomers of the racemic allene (±)-1—(P)-1 and (M)-1—being converted into the same crotylborane intermediate, (S)-E-2. Therefore, the synthesis of an enantiomerically pure allenylstannane precursor is not required to access (E)-δ-stannyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 3 with high enantioselecetivity and high chemical efficiency.
Scheme 1.

Enantioconvergent and Enantioselective Hydroboration of Racemic Allenylstannane (±)-4) and Proposed Enantioselective Hydroboration of Racemic Allenylsilane (±)-4
In our continuing efforts to expand the scope of enantioselective allene hydroboration reactions for the synthesis of α-functionalized allylboranes, we envisioned that an analogous enantioconvergent reaction might be possible using racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 as the substrate. If so, the α –silyl-crotylborane (S)-E-5 that would be generated would provide access to enantioenriched (E)-3-silyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 6 (Scheme 1). The vinylsilane unit of 6 is as useful for many subsequent transformations as is the vinylstannane unit of 3. We describe here the results of our studies on the enantioselective hydroboration of racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH.6
2. Results and Discussion
In initial experiments, treatment of racemic allenylsilane (±)-47 with (dIpc)2BH (1 equiv) in toluene at 0 °C for 4 h, followed by addition of benzaldehyde (1 equiv) at −78 °C provided a 5:1 mixture of anti-homoallylic alcohol 6a (76% ee) and the syn isomer 7a (58% ee) in 41% and 7% yield, respectively (Scheme 2, top panel). Intriguingly, a ketone byproduct 8 (ca. 40%) was also identified. After extensive evaluation of several reaction parameters,6 we determined that when the hydroboration of racemic allene (±)-4 was carried out with (dIpc)2BH (1 equiv) in toluene at −25 °C to −15 °C for 8 h, followed by treatment of the resulting crotylborane with 0.45 equiv of aldehyde at −78 °C, homoallylic alcohols 6a–f (93–96% ee) were obtained in 71–89% yields (based on the aldehyde as limiting reagent) from both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes (Scheme 2, bottom panel). Ketone 8 was also formed in these reactions. The absolute stereochemistry of homoallylic alcohols 6 was assigned by using the modified Mosher ester analysis.8 The anti-stereochemistry of 6d was verified by protiodesilylation (TBAF, DMSO, 80 °C) and comparison of the spectroscopic properties of the derived anti-homoallylic alcohol with an authentic sample.6
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of (E)-δ-Silyl-anti-homoallylic Alcohols 6
In contrast to the our previously reported enantioconvergent hydroboration of allenylstannane (±)-1,4a the data in Scheme 2 for the hydroboration of racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH suggest that this reaction proceeds via an enantiodivergent pathway. As illustrated in Scheme 3 (Panel A), hydroboration of allenylsilane enantiomer (P)-4 with (dIpc)2BH occurs preferentially on the re-face of the methyl substituted olefin of (P)-4, anti to PhMe2Si- to give intermediate (R)-Z-9 (first equation of Panel A) We presume that this reaction is stereochemically matched,4a,9 since the enantioselectivity of this step parallels the enantioselectivity known for the hydroboration of (Z)-olefins with (dIpc)2BH.4a,9 Subsequent 1,3-shift of the boryl unit of (R)-Z-9 gives crotylborane (S)-E-5. On the other hand, hydroboration of (P)-4 with opposite regioselectivity on the olefin adjacent to the PhMe2Si- group (second equation, Panel A) leads to the diastereomeric reagent (S)-Z-10 which can isomerize to (R)d-E-5 via a sequence of reversible 1,3-boratropic shifts. Crotylboration of aldehydes with (R)d-E-5 will give the enantiomeric alcohol product, ent-6. During the optimization of this hydroboration sequence,6 we observed that the pathway summarized in the second equation in Panel A of Scheme 3 is suppressed when the hydroboration is performed at temperatures below −25 °C. Other pathways for the hydroboration of allene (P)-4 with (dIpc)2BH, as illustrated in the third line of Panel A (Scheme 3), are either mismatched with respect to the enantiofacial selectivity of (dIpc)2BH [as determined by the hydroboration of (Z)-olefins4a,9] or mismatched in that hydroboration reaction occurs on the sterically disfavored face of the allene.
Scheme 3.
Proposed Enantiodivergent Hydroboration-Isomerization Pathways for the Two Enantiomers of Racemic Allenylsilane (±)-4. (A) Pathways for enantioselective hydroboration of (P)-4 with(dIpc)2BH, (B) Pathways for enantioselective hydroboration of (M)-4 with (dIpc)2BH,
Hydroboration of allene enantiomer (M)-4 with (dIpc)2BH is stereochemically mismatched when hydrogen adds to the central allenyl carbon atom.4a,9 The hydroboration transition states presented in the 3nd line of Panel B (Scheme 3) are mismatched with respect to the enantioselectivity of (dIpc)2BH (first two transition structures, 3rd line, Panel B) or because the hydroboration occurs on the sterically hindered face of allene (M)-4 (third transition structure, 3rd line, Panel B). The hydroboration pathway presented in the 1st line of Panel B (Scheme 3) is also disfavored (addition to the more hindered face of the allene) and constitutes a minor pathway leading to crotylborane (S)-E-5 from allene (M)-4.6 However, the enantioselective hydroboration of (M)-4 can proceed with boron adding to the central allenyl carbon atom, anti to the PhMe2Si- group to give vinylborane 11, the precursor to ketone 8 (as indicated in the 2nd line of Panel B, Scheme 3). The sense of hydroboration in the conversion of (M)-4 to 11 is consistent with the enantioselectivity of hydroboration of (Z)-olefins by (dIpc)2BH,4a,9 and is also favored in that the hydroboration occurs on the less hindered face of the allene, anti to the distal bulky PhMe2Si- group. Hence, the hydroboration of (M)-4 to give 11 appears to be stereochemically matched.
The rates of hydroboration of the two enantiomers of racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH are comparable, as indicated by the fact that the allene recovered from experiments in which (dIpc)2BH is the limiting reagent (0.45 equiv) is nearly racemic (<10% ee).6 Therefore, the transformation presented in Scheme 2 is not a kinetic resolution. Rather, the fact that the enantioselective hydroboration of the two enantiomers of 4 proceed with different modes of addition to produce two structurally distinct intermediates, (S)-E-5 and 11, respectively, is critical to the success of this reaction for the synthesis of homoallylic alcohols 6 with high enantioselectivity.
Evidence in support of this analysis, deriving from studies of the hydroboration of enantiomerically pure allenylsilanes (P)-4 and (M)-4 with (dIpc)2BH, and 1H NMR studies of the hydroboration reactions of (P)-4 or (M)-4 with (dIpc)2BH (demonstrating the significant production of 11 in the hydroboration of (M)-4) was included in our preliminary communication but is not repeated here.6
It is worth noting that, while the resting state of the products of hydroboration of monosubstituted allenylsilane 12 with (dIpc)2BH are the (E)- or (Z)-γ-silyl-allylboranes, 14E or 14Z (depending on the temperature of the hydroboration reaction),10 the product resting state for the hydroboration of the 3-methyl substituted allenylsilane 4 with (dIpc)2BH is (E)-α-silyl-crotylborane (S)-E-5. Indeed, 1H NMR studies of the hydroboration reaction of (P)-4 with (dIpc)2BH shows that (S)-E-5 is produced cleanly. Other crotylborane species such as (R)-Z-9 or (S)-E-15 are not observed (Scheme 4). Presumably a combination of the hyperconjugative effect between the PhMe2Si– group and the adjacent boron atom (analogous to a silyl-stabilized β-carbocation)11 and steric effects account for (S)-E-5 being the only observed (and most stable) crotylborane product of the hydroboration of (P)-4. Steric repulsion between the methyl group and the (dIpc)2B– unit in either (R)-Z-9 or (S)-E-15 destabilizes these two species at equilibrium. Subsequent crotylboration of achiral aldehydes with (S)-E-5 proceeds through the chair-like transition state TS-1 with pseudo equatorial placement of the PhMe2Si– group to give (E)-3-silyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 6 (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.
Comparison of Hydroboration-Isomerization Pathways for Allenylsilanes 12 and (±)-4
To evaluate the potential of crotylborane (S)-E-5 as a reagent for organic synthesis, double asymmetric reactions12 with several representative chiral aldehydes were studied. First, double asymmetric reactions of β-alkoxy aldehyde 16 were explored (Scheme 5). The matched1a,13 double asymmetric reaction of 16 and reagent (S)-E-5 provided 17 with a 4,6-anti relationship between the new hydroxyl group and the methoxyl substituent of aldehyde 16, in 71% yield and with >20:1 diastereoselectivity. The mismatched double asymmetric reaction of 16 using the enantiomeric reagent (R)l-E-5 [generated from allene (±)-4 and (lIpc)2BH] provided the 4,6-syn diastereomer 18 as the major product of an 8:1 product mixture. Surprisingly, the minor product (19) was determined by 1H NMR analysis to be a crotylsilane regioisomer. As will be discussed subsequently, crotylsilane adducts such as 19 derive from crotylboration reactions of (R)l-E-15 which was not detected in our NMR analysis of hydroboration reaction mixtures (vide supra).
Scheme 5.
Double Asymmetric Reactions of β-Methoxylaldehyde 16 with Reagents (S)-E-5 and (R)l-E-5.
The formation of crotylsilane products such as 19 became much more prominent in studies of double asymmetric reactions of α-methyl branched chiral aldehydes, of interest as precursors to the di- and tri-propionate fragments found in many polyketide natural products.14 For example, the matched double asymmetric reaction of aldehyde 20a with reagent (R)l-E-5 provided a 1:1 mixture of the expected crotylation product 21 and the crotylsilane regioisomer 22 (Scheme 6).
Scheme 6.

Matched Double Asymmetric Reaction of Chiral Aldehyde 20a with (R)l-E-5.
Strikingly, crotylsilane adducts 24 proved to be the exclusive products of the mismatched double asymmetric reactions presented in Scheme 7. The originally targeted anti, anti-stereotriads 2314 were not detected in any of these experiments. The absolute stereochemistry of the secondary hydroxyl groups of homoallylic alcohols 22 and 24 was assigned by using the modified Mosher ester analysis.8 The olefin geometry of crotylsilanes 22 and 24 was Z (JZ = 10.8 Hz). The relative stereochemistry of the newly generated stereocenters in 3-hydroxyl-crotylsilanes 24 were assigned by using both base and acid mediated Peterson elimination reactions.15 As shown in Scheme 8, addition of 24a to a THF solution of KOt-Bu at 0 °C provided the syn-elimination product 25a. Similar results were obtained with 24b and 24c (Scheme 8). The coupling constant between the two vinyl protons of the newly formed olefin in (Z, Z)-diene 25 is 10.8–11.2 Hz, which is consistent with a (Z)-olefin. On the other hand, treatment of 3-hydroxyl-crotylsilane 24a with BF3•OEt2 at −78 °C provided anti-elimination product (E, Z)-diene 26a. Dienes 26b and 26c were obtained under similar elimination reactions from 24b and 24c, respectively (Scheme 8). The coupling constant of the two vinyl protons in the newly formed olefin is 15.2 Hz, which is consistent with an (E)-olefin. Based on these data, the products obtained from the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reactions of aldehydes 20 with (S)-E-5 are (Z)-anti-3-hydroxyl-crotylsilanes 24.
Scheme 7.
Mismatched Double Asymmetric Crotylboration Reactions of Chiral Aldehydes 20 with (S)-E-5
Reactions were performed by treating (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH (1 equiv) in toluene at −25 °C and warming to −15 °C over 8 h followed by the addition of aldehydes 20 (0.4 equiv) at −78 °C. The mixture was then allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 12 h. The reactions were subjected to a standard workup (NaHCO3, H2O2) at 0 °C prior to product isolation.
Scheme 8.
Base and Acid Mediated Peterson Elimination Reactions of 3-Hydroxy-crotylsilanes 24
We focus on the attempted mismatched double asymmetric reactions of Scheme 7 in the following discussion. Assuming that these mismatched crotylboration reactions proceed through a chair-like transition state,1 the surprising results in Scheme 7 indicate that the dominant reactive crotylborane intermediate involved in these mismatched double asymmetric crotylborations is (S)-E-15, with the PhMe2Si– group positioned distal to the boron atom (Scheme 4). (An analogous reagent must also be involved in the chemistry summarized in Schemes 5b and 6, but to a lesser extent as compounds 19 and 22 are not the dominant products of those reactions). Although it is expected that (S)-E-5 can equilibrate with (S)-E-15 via a reversible 1,3-boratropic shift.16 1H NMR studies on the hydroboration of single enantiomer allenylsilanes (P)-4 and (M)-4 indicate that the amount of (S)-E-15 in the equilibrium mixture is negligible (not observed). Hence, these data suggest that: (1) the rate of the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration of aldehydes 20a–c with (S)-E-15 (Scheme 7) is much faster than the rate of crotylboration with (S)-E-5; and (2) the rate of equilibration between (S)-E-5 and (S)-E-15 is much faster than the rates of the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration of aldehydes 20 with these crotylboranes. Therefore, these reactions proceed under Curtin-Hammett control17 with (S)-E-5 funneling to the more reactive intermediate (S)-E-15 (with respect to aldehydes 20a–c) to give the (Z)-anti-3-hydroxyl-crotylsilanes 24. Although, Curtin-Hammett controlled transformations are well documented in the literature,17 to the best of our knowledge this behavior has not previously been observed in reactions of allylboration reagents.
Further analysis of this Curtin-Hammett controlled mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration is presented in Scheme 9. There are four possible transition states for the crotylborations of enantioenriched aldehydes 20a-c with crotylborane species (S)-E-5 and (S)-E-15, TS-2 to TS-5. Among these, TS-2 and TS-3, which lead to formation of 27 and 28, respectively, operate under Felkin-Anh control.18 However, the arrangement of the crotyl group in TS-2 and TS-3 is mismatched with respect to the enantiofacial selectivity of the (dIpc)2B− group.13 Owing to the unfavorable non-bonding steric interactions in the transition states (shown in red), TS-2 and TS-3 are likely disfavored. Hence, the rates of crotylboration via these two transition states are comparatively slow. On the other hand, TS-4 and TS-5, which lead to the formation of 23 and 24, respectively, incorporate the proper sense of asymmetric induction deriving from the (dIpc)2B– units of reagents (S)-E-5 and (S)-E-15.13 However, the conformation of the aldehyde α-stereocenter in TS-4 and TS-5 is opposite to what is predicted by the Felkin-Anh model and gauche-pentane interactions18 between the methyl or PhMe2Si group of the crotyl units and the R group of the aldehydes could occur in these two transition states (indicated in blue). Considering the relatively longer Si-C bond (estimated to be 1.85Å) compared to a C-C bond (1.54Å),10 the steric repulsion in TS-5 is attenuated compared to TS-4, which likely renders TS-5 [crotylboration of 20 with (S)-E-15] to be the most favored transition state for the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration of aldehyde 20. Moreover, the PhMe2Si group is in a more hindered position, adjacent to the bulky (dIpc)2B- group in TS-4. Therefore, crotylborane (S)-E-5 funnels to the more reactive intermediate (S)-E-15 via a reversible 1,3-boratropic shift under the reaction conditions and the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reactions of aldehydes 20 proceed under Curtin-Hammett control via transition state TS-5 with pseudo axial placement of the methyl group to give (Z)-anti-3-hydroxyl-crotylsilanes 24.
Scheme 9.
Transition State Analyses of Mismatched Double Asymmetric Crotylboration of Aldehydes 20 with Crotylboranes (S)-E-5 and (S)-E-15
3. Conclusion
We have developed an enantioselective synthesis of (E)-3-silyl-anti-homoallylic alcohols 6 via an enantiodivergent hydroboration-crotylboration reaction sequence that originates with the enantioselective hydroboration of allenylsilane (±)-4 with (dIpc)2BH. Under optimized conditions, homoallylic alcohols 6 were obtained in 71–89% yield and with excellent enantioselectivity from racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 and achiral aldehydes. The preparation of an enantiomerically pure allenylsilane is not required to produce highly enantioenriched homoallylic alcohol products 6. In addition, the silyl substituted olefin unit embedded in the homoallylic alcohol products is suitable for use in a variety of subsequent transformations.19–21 A Curtin-Hammett controlled mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration of chiral aldehydes 20a–c was discovered, in which reagent (S)-E-5 isomerizes to the less stable, but more reactive transient reagent (S)-E-15. Specifically, the transient reagent (S)-E-15, deriving from (S)-E-5 via a reversible 1,3-boratropic shift, reacts with aldehydes 20 faster than (S)-E-5 and provides (Z)-anti-3-hydroxyl-crotylsilanes 24 as the products instead of the expected vinylsilanes 23. Synthetic applications of this methodology will be reported in due course.
4. Experimental
General Experimental Details
All reaction solvents were purified before use. Tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, diethyl ether and toluene were purified by passing through a solvent column composed of activated A-1 alumina. Unless indicated otherwise, all reactions were conducted under an atmosphere of argon using flame-dried or oven-dried (140 °C) glassware. The term “concentrated under reduced pressure” refers to the removal of solvents and other volatile materials using a rotary evaporator with the water bath temperature below 40 °C, followed by removal of residual solvent at high vacuum (< 0.2 mbar). Enantiomeric excesses were determined by the Mosher method.8
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were recorded on a commercial instrument at 400 MHz. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) spectra were recorded at 100 MHz. The proton signal for residual non-deuterated solvent (δ 7.26 for CHCl3) was used as an internal reference for 1H NMR spectra. For 13C NMR spectra, chemical shifts are reported relative to the δ77.36 resonance of CHCl3. Coupling constants are reported in Hz. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded as films on a commercial FTIR instrument. Optical rotations were measured using a quartz cell with 1 mL capacity and a 10 cm path length. Melting points were determined on a hot stage melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. High resolution mass spectra were recorded on a commercial high resolution mass spectrometer
Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Kieselgel 60 F254 glass plates precoated with a 0.25 mm thickness of silica gel. The TLC plates were visualized with UV light and/or by staining with Hanessian solution (ceric sulfate and ammonium molybdate in aqueous sulfuric acid) or KMnO4. Column chromatography was generally performed using Kieselgel 60 (230–400 mesh) silica gel, typically using a 50–100:1 weight ratio of silica gel to crude product.
(1S,2S,E)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-2-methyl-1-phenylbut-3-en-1-ol (6a)
Crystalline (dIpc)2BH (143 mg, 0.50 mmol) was weighed into a round bottom flask containing a stir bar in a glove box. (Note: The crystalline borane should be crushed and pulverized to fine powder with a glass rod in order to ensure efficient hydroboration). The flask was capped with a rubber septum and removed from the glove box. And then the flask was placed in a cold bath (−25 °C). Toluene (2 mL) was added slowly to the flask and the mixture (suspension) was cooled to −25 °C (~10 mins). Racemic allenylsilane (±)-42 (94 mg, 0.5 mmol) was added neat via a microliter syringe. This mixture was stirred for 4 h at −25 °C, and slowly warmed to −15 °C for 4 h, during which time the solid (dIpc)2BH dissolved to leave a colorless solution. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C and freshly distilled benzaldehyde (24 mg, 0.225 mmol) was added at −78 °C dropwise to the reaction mixture via microliter syringe. The mixture was stirred for 12 h at −78 °C. MeOH (0.1 mL) was added to the −78 °C solution and the reaction was allowed to warm to 0 °C. To the 0 °C mixture was added saturated NaHCO3 (0.5 mL) followed by slow addition of 30% H2O2 (1.0 mL). The reaction was stirred vigorously for 5 h at room temperature. Brine (2 mL) was added, the organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 3 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash column chromatography (gradient elution: hexane:Et2O = 200:1 to 10:1), which provided homoallylic alcohol 6a (57 mg, 85% yield) as a colorless oil. [α]D26.8 = − 83.8° (c 1.15, CHCl3); 85% yield; 95% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27–7.49 (m, 10H), 6.12 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (d, J = 18.4 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (dd, J = 7.6, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.52–2.57 (m, 1H), 2.07 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.35 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.5, 142.7, 139.0, 134.1, 130.9, 129.3, 128.5, 128.1, 127.9, 127.1, 78.1, 49.2, 16.6, −2.14, −2.17; IR (neat) 3400, 3067, 2959, 2929, 1614, 1493, 1453, 1427, 1327, 1247, 1112, 1070, 1022, 998, 843, 822, 731, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C19H24OSiNa [M+Na]+ calcd 319.1494, found 319.1500.
(1E,3R,4S,5E)-6-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-4-methyl-1-phenylhexa-1,5-dien-3-ol (6b)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.7 = −24.3° (c 1.41, CHCl3); 78% yield; 95% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.38 (m, 7H), 7.22–7.25 (m, 1H), 6.58 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (dd, J = 16.0, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (dd, J = 18.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 4.09–4.11 (m, 1H), 2.40–2.48 (m, 1H), 1.78 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.35 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.2, 139.1, 137.1, 134.1, 131.9, 130.7, 130.5, 129.3, 128.9, 128.1, 128.0, 126.8, 76.4, 47.6, 16.1, −2.1; IR (neat) 3400, 3067, 2960, 1614, 1494, 1450, 1427, 1317, 1247, 1113, 1069, 1023, 998, 967, 844, 829, 732, 695 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C21H26OSiNa [M+Na]+ calcd 345.1651, found 345.1653
(1R,2S,E)-1-cyclohexyl-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-2-methylbut-3-en-1-ol (6c)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.6 = −19.3° (c 1.86, CHCl3); 71% yield; 94% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.36 (m, 3H), 6.08 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.11–3.16 (m, 1H), 2.39–2.48 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.60–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.42 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.36–1.41 (m, 1H), 1.06–1.26 (m, 5H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.34 (s, 3H), 0.33 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.8, 139.3, 134.1, 130.1, 129.3, 128.1, 79.0, 44.0, 40.8, 30.4, 27.3, 26.88, 26.86, 26.5, 17.2, −2.1, −2.2; IR (neat) 3435, 3068, 2924, 2852, 1613, 1449, 1427, 1247, 1113, 1067, 999, 844, 827, 730, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C19H30OSiNa [M+Na]+ calcd 325.1964, found 325.1971.
(3R,4S,E)-6-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-4-methyl-1-phenylhex-5-en-3-ol (6d)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.4 = −4.61° (c 0.97, CHCl3); 89% yield; 93% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.27–7.31 (m, 2H) 7.17–7.21 (m, 3H), 6.04 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.90 (dd, J = 18.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 3.43–3.47 (m, 1H), 2.85 (ddd, J = 14.0, 10.0, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.29–2.34 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.86 (m, 1H), 1.66–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.57 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.34 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.3, 142.6, 139.1, 134.1, 130.7, 129.3, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 126.1, 74.2, 47.4, 36.4, 32.5, 16.3, −2.1; IR (neat) 3391, 3066, 3020, 2957, 2923, 1613, 1454, 1427, 1248, 1113, 1068, 1023, 998, 843, 827, 731, 698 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C21H28OSiNa [M+Na]+ calcd 347.1807, found 347.1805
(2S,3S,E)-1-(benzyloxy)-5-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-3-methylpent-4-en-2-ol (6e)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.7 = −16.1° (c 0.91, CHCl3); 75% yield; 96% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.38 (m, 8H), 6.14 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.85 (dd, J = 18.8, 1.2, Hz, 1H), 4.55 (s, 2H), 3.70–3.75 (m, 1H), 3.53 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.42 (dd, J = 9.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.42–2.47 (m, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.06 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.34 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.1, 139.3, 138.4, 134.1, 129.3, 129.2, 128.8, 128.09, 128.07, 73.8, 73.7, 72.8, 43.7, 16.2, −2.1, −2.2; IR (neat) 3401, 3068, 2959, 2929, 2873, 1722, 1614, 1454, 1428, 1372, 1316, 1248, 1114, 1028, 998, 842, 826, 733, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C21H28O2SiNa [M+Na]+ calcd 363.1756, found 363.1755.
(3R,4S,E)-1-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-4-methyl-hex-5-en-3-ol (6f)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.7 = −11.5° (c 1.35, CHCl3); 72% yield; 95% ee; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.36 (m, 3H), 6.14 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (dd, J = 18.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.86–3.91 (m, 1H), 3.78–3.84 (m, 1H), 3.72–3.76 (m, 3H), 3.08 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.35 (m, 1H), 1.59–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.06 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.33 (s, 6H), 0.08 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.9, 139.5, 134.1, 129.2, 128.8, 128.1, 75.1, 63.0, 46.8, 35.9, 26.2, 18.5, 15.8, −2.05, −2.08, −5.1; IR (neat) 3436, 3069, 2956, 2930, 2858, 1614, 1471, 1463, 1428, 1253, 1088, 997, 837, 778, 731, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C21H38O2Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 401.2308, found 401.2301
(4S,5R,6S,7S,8S,Z)-7-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-6,8-dimethyldeca-2,9-dien-5-ol (24c)
Crystalline (dIpc)2BH (143 mg, 0.50 mmol) was weighed into a round bottom flask containing a stir bar in a glove box. (Note: The crystalline borane should be crushed and pulverized to fine powder with a glass rod in order to ensure efficient hydroboration). The flask was capped with a rubber septum and removed from the glove box. And then the flask was placed in a cold bath (−25 °C). Toluene (1 mL) was added slowly to the flask and the mixture (suspension) was cooled to −25 °C (~10 mins). Racemic allenylsilane (±)-4 (94 mg, 0.5 mmol) was added neat via a microliter syringe. This mixture was stirred for 4 h at −25 °C, and slowly warmed to −15 °C for 4 h, during which time the solid (dIpc)2BH dissolved to leave a colorless solution. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C and freshly prepared aldehyde 20c (51 mg, 0.2 mmol) was added at −78 °C to the reaction mixture via microliter syringe. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at −78 °C and slowly warmed to ambient temperature and kept stirring for 8 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0 °C with ice bath. To the 0 °C mixture was added saturated NaHCO3 (0.5 mL) followed by slow addition of 30% H2O2 (1.0 mL). The reaction was stirred vigorously for 5 h at room temperature. Brine (5 mL) was added, the organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash column chromatography (gradient elution: hexane:Et2O = 500:1 to 10:1), which provided alcohol 24c (62 mg, 70% yield) as a colorless oil. [α]D27.1 = −25.6° (c 1.78, CHCl3); 70% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.55–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.35 (m, 3H), 5.93 (ddd, J = 17.2, 10.0, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (ddq, J = 11.2, 11.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (dq, J = 11.2, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.88–4.94 (m, 2H), 3.86 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (t, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (bs, 1H), 2.33–2.41 (m, 1H), 2.14 (dd, J = 11.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.71–1.80 (m, 1H), 1.31 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.6 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.65 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.35 (s, 3H), 0.31 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.03 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.6, 139.5, 134.5, 129.0, 127.8, 126.6, 122.9, 114.6, 80.6, 73.4, 42.3, 40.9, 33.0, 26.3, 20.3, 18.0, 13.5, 13.3, −3.1, −3.4, −3.9, −4.1; IR (neat) 3500, 3070, 2957, 2930, 2859, 1641, 1471, 1463, 1427, 1372, 1252, 1113, 1024, 837, 733, 700 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C26H46O2Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 469.2934, found 469.2941.
(4S,5R,6S,7R,8R,Z)-9-((tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-7-methoxy-6,8-dimethylnon-2-en-5-ol (24a)
A colorless oil: [α]D27.2 = −15.8° (c 1.82, CHCl3); 62% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.71 (m, 6H), 7.31–7.44 (m, 9H), 5.61 (ddq, J = 11.2, 11.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (dq, J = 11.2, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (dd, J = 10.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 3.00 (dd, J = 7.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.20 (bd, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 1.91–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.76–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.31 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.04 (s, 9H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.62 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.38 (s, 3H), 0.32 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.7, 136.0, 135.95, 134.5, 134.3, 134.2, 129.9, 128.9, 127.9, 127.7, 126.9, 122.6, 91.4, 75.5, 65.5, 61.1, 40.1, 40.0, 32.7, 27.3, 19.6, 15.7, 15.4, 13.4, −3.1, −3.2; IR (neat) 3470, 3070, 2960, 2931, 2858, 1471, 1427, 1391, 1244, 1112, 1072, 840, 821, 737, 701 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C36H52O3Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 611.3353, found 611.3361.
(4S,5R,6S,7R,8S,Z)-9-((tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-7-methoxy-6,8-dimethylnon-2-en-5-ol (24b)
A colorless oil: [α]D26.9 = −1.58° (c 3.16, CHCl3); 67% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60–7.67 (m, 6H), 7.31–7.45 (m, 9H), 5.69 (ddq, J = 11.2, 11.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (dq, J = 10.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dd, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (bd, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.47–3.56 (m, 2H), 3.384 (s, 3H), 3.38 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (dt, J = 11.6, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.80–1.85 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.31 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 0.72 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.62 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.40 (s, 3H), 0.34 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.7, 135.91, 135.89, 134.6, 134.1, 134.0, 130.0, 128.9, 128.01, 128.0, 127.7, 127.0, 122.5, 87.5, 75.4, 66.7, 61.3, 40.4, 39.0, 32.9, 27.2, 19.6, 14.6, 13.4, 10.2, −3.2; IR (neat) 3468, 3070, 3016, 2960, 2931, 2858, 1471, 1428, 1392, 1245, 1112, 1071, 823, 738, 701 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C36H52O3Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 611.3353, found 611.3358.
(3S,4R,6R,7R,E)-8-((tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy)-1-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-6-methoxy-3,7-dimethyloct-1-en-4-ol (17)
A colorless oil: [α]D27.1 = −5.35° (c 1.35, CHCl3); 71% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65–7.67 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.43 (m, 9H), 6.08 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.85 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.64 (m, 2H), 3.52 (dd, J = 10.0, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 2.16–2.25 (m, 1H), 2.18 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.89–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.55–1.61 (m, 1H), 1.45–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.06 (s, 9H), 1.00 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.33 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.6, 139.3, 136.0, 135.95, 134.2, 134.17, 134.12, 129.9, 129.2, 128.1, 128.0, 80.0, 72.1, 65.9, 58.6, 47.6, 39.2, 35.9, 27.2, 19.6, 16.5, 12.8, −2.08, −2.1; IR (neat) 3459, 3070, 2959, 2931, 2858, 1614, 1471, 1462, 1427, 1247, 1112, 998, 825, 737, 701 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C35H50O3Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 597.3196, found 597.3194.
(3R,4S,6R,7R,E)-8-((tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy)-1-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-6-methoxy-3,7-dimethyloct-1-en-4-ol (18)
A colorless oil: [α]D27.2 = 8.25° (c 0.98, CHCl3); 63% yield; 8:1 dr; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.31–7.44 (m, 9H), 6.10 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.81 (dd, J = 18.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (dd, J = 10.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60–3.65 (m, 1H), 3.51–3.56 (m, 2H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.21 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.27–2.34 (m, 1H), 1.95 (ddd, J = 13.2, 6.8, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.43–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.06 (s, 9H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.321 (s, 3H), 0.317 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.8, 139.5, 136.0, 135.94, 134.2, 134.13, 130.0, 129.2, 128.8, 128.1, 128.0, 83.4, 75.1, 65.4, 57.8, 46.9, 38.4, 34.5, 27.3, 19.6, 15.5, 12.4, −2.04, −2.09; IR (neat) 3435, 3070, 2959, 2930, 2858, 1462, 1427, 1247, 1112, 1082, 824, 737, 700 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C35H50O3Si2Na [M+Na]+ calcd 597.3196, found 597.3214.
Acknowledgments
Financial support provided by the National Institutes of Health (GM038436) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Eli Lilly for a predoctoral fellowship to M. Chen.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.(a) Roush WR. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, editor. Vol. 2. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991. p. 1. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yamamoto Y, Asao N. Chem Rev. 1993;93:2207. [Google Scholar]; (c) Denmark SE, Almstead NG. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. p. 299. [Google Scholar]; (d) Chemler SR, Roush WR. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. p. 403. [Google Scholar]; (e) Denmark SE, Fu J. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2763. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Lachance H, Hall DG. Org React. 2008;73:1. [Google Scholar]; (g) Yus M, Gonzáles-Gómez JC, Foubelo F. Chem Rev. 2011;111:7774. doi: 10.1021/cr1004474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Pietruszka J, Schone N. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:5638. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pelz NF, Woodward AR, Burks HE, Sieber JD, Morken JP. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:16328. doi: 10.1021/ja044167u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sieber JD, Morken JP. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:74. doi: 10.1021/ja057020r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ito H, Ito S, Sasaki Y, Matsuura K, Sawamura M. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14856. doi: 10.1021/ja076634o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Peng F, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3070. doi: 10.1021/ja068985t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2010;12:2706. doi: 10.1021/ol1007444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Althaus M, Mahmood A, Suarez JR, Thomas SP, Aggarwal VK. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4025. doi: 10.1021/ja910593w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Kliman LT, Mlynarski SN, Ferris GE, Morken JP. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:521. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Ferris GE, Hong K, Roundtree IA, Morken JP. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:2501. doi: 10.1021/ja400506j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.For a recently review on allenes in asymmetric synthesis: Yu S, Ma S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:3074. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101460.
- 4.(a) Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:5744. doi: 10.1021/ja2010187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen M, Ess DH, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:7881. doi: 10.1021/ja103041u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Han JL, Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2012;14:3028. doi: 10.1021/ol3010968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Sun H, Abbott JR, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2011;13:2734. doi: 10.1021/ol200834p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Yin M, Roush WR. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:10274. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2012;14:426. doi: 10.1021/ol203161u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2012;14:1556. doi: 10.1021/ol300282e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2012;14:1880. doi: 10.1021/ol300476f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Chen M, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 2013;78:3. doi: 10.1021/jo3008226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2013;15:1662. doi: 10.1021/ol4004405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Marshall JA, Maxson K. J Org Chem. 2000;65:630. doi: 10.1021/jo991543y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fleming I, Waterson D. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1984:1809. [Google Scholar]; (c) Fleming I, Newton TW, Roessler F. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1981:2527. [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Dale JA, Mosher HS. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:512. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ohtani I, Kusumi T, Kashman Y, Kakisawa H. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:4092. [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Brown HC, Zweifel G. J Am Chem Soc. 1961;83:486. [Google Scholar]; (b) Zweifel G, Brown HC. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:397. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2011;13:1992. doi: 10.1021/ol200392u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Davis DD, Gray CE. J Org Chem. 1970;35:1303. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jerkunica JM, Traylor TG. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:6278. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wierschke SG, Chandrasekhar J, Jorgensen WL. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:1496. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lambert JB, Wang GT, Finzel RB. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:7838. [Google Scholar]; (e) Lambert JB, Wang GT, Teramura DH. J Org Chem. 1988;53:5422. [Google Scholar]; (f) Stewart P, Chen M, Roush WR, Ess D. Org Lett. 2011;13:1478. doi: 10.1021/ol2001599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Masamune S, Choy W, Petersen JS, Sita LR. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1985;24:1. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown HC, Bhat KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:293. doi: 10.1021/ja00279a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Hoffmann RW. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1987;26:489. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hoffmann RW, Dahmann G, Andersen MW. Synthesis. 1994:629. [Google Scholar]; (c) Chemler SR, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3800. doi: 10.1021/jo0267908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chemler SR, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 2003;83:1319. doi: 10.1021/jo0267908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:3925. doi: 10.1021/ja300472a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Peterson DJ. J Org Chem. 1968;33:780. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ager DJ. Org React. 1990;38:1. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Hancock KG, Kramer JD. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:6463. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kramer GW, Brown HC. J Organomet Chem. 1977;132:9. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hoffmann RW, Zeiss HJ. J Org Chem. 1981;46:1309. [Google Scholar]; (d) Henriksen U, Snyder JP, Halgren TA. J Org Chem. 1981;46:3767. [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang KK, Gu YG, Liu C. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:4424. [Google Scholar]; (f) Fang GY, Aggarwal VK. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:359. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Canales E, González AZ, Soderquist JA. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:397. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Kister J, DeBaillie AC, Lira R, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14174. doi: 10.1021/ja905494c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Chen M, Handa M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14602. doi: 10.1021/ja904599h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Ess DH, Kister J, Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2009;11:5538. doi: 10.1021/ol902364d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Seeman JI. Chem Rev. 1983;83:83. [Google Scholar]; (b) Halpern J. Science. 1982;217:401. doi: 10.1126/science.217.4558.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Landis CR, Halpern J. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:1746. [Google Scholar]
- 18.(a) Roush WR. J Org Chem. 1991;56:4151. [Google Scholar]; (b) Cherest M, Felkin H, Prudent N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968;18:2199. [Google Scholar]; (c) Anh NT, Eisenstein O. Nouv J Chim. 1977;1:61. [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Blumenkopf TA, Overman LE. Chem Rev. 1986;86:857. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fleming I. Org React. 1989;37:57. [Google Scholar]; (c) Fleming I, Barbero A, Walter D. Chem Rev. 1997;97:2063. doi: 10.1021/cr941074u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.(a) Miura K, Hosomi A. Synlett. 2003:143. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yu CM, Youn J, Jung HK. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2006;27:463. [Google Scholar]; (c) Evans DA, Aye Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:11034. doi: 10.1021/ja063878k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ilardi EA, Stivala CE, Zakarian A. Org Lett. 2008;10:1727. doi: 10.1021/ol800341z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Nishimoto Y, Kajioka M, Saito T, Yasuda M, Baba A. Chem Commun. 2008:6396. doi: 10.1039/b816072d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Bates RH, Chen M, Roush WR. Curr Opin Drug Discovery Dev. 2008;11:778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Aikawa K, Hioki YT, Mikami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:13922. doi: 10.1021/ja906164p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.For select reviews of Hiyama coupling: Denmark SE, Liu JHC. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:2978. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905657.Denmark SE, Sweis RF. In: In Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. 2. de Meijere A, Diederich F, editors. Chapter 4 Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. Hiyama T. In: Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Diederich F, Stang PJ, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1998. 10 and references cited therein.







