Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2010 Jun 1;41(2):286–294. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000200004

Identification of Candida spp. by phenotypic tests and PCR

Sandra Aparecida Marinho 1,2, Alice Becker Teixeira 1, Otávio Silveira Santos 1, Ricardo Flores Cazanova 1, Carlos Alexandre Sanchez Ferreira 1, Karen Cherubini 2, Sílvia Dias de Oliveira 1,*
PMCID: PMC3768677  PMID: 24031493

Abstract

The correct identification of Candida species is of great importance, as it presents prognostic and therapeutical significance, allowing an early and appropriate antifungical therapy. The purpose of this study was to identify isolates of Candida spp. from oral mucosa of 38 patients with oral candidosis evaluated in 2004 by phenotypic methods and PCR, discriminating C. albicans from the other Candida species. The tests used for phenotypic analysis were germ-tube and chlamydoconidia production, culture in CHROMAgar™ Candida, carbohydrate assimilation test, growth at 45ºC and culture in Tween 80 agar. Genotypic confirmation was performed by PCR. Phenotypic tests showed that 63.2% strains formed germ-tubes, 73.7% produced chlamydoconidia, and 63.2% showed green colonies in chromogenic medium, presumptively indicating C. albicans or C. dubliniensis. The carbohydrate assimilation test confirmed these results. A total of 21% strains were identified as C. krusei and 13.2% were indicative of C. tropicalis. Of these later strains, three produced chlamydoconidia. The association of other phenotypic tests with culture in Tween 80 agar identified 95.8% of strains as C. albicans and 4.2% as C. dubliniensis. All 24 strains indicative of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were confirmed by PCR as C. albicans.

Keywords: Candida spp., – identification – PCR – phenotypic tests

INTRODUCTION

Human pathogenic yeasts are ubiquitous in the environment (1), and some species belong to the normal human microbiota (2, 3). Candida species are usually opportunistic organisms (4), and oral candidosis ranks high in terms of incidence among the many opportunist infections observed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. C. albicans has long been considered the predominant etiologic agent of oral candidosis (26). Over the last decade, however, there has been an increase in the incidence of candidosis in immunocompromised individuals caused by other Candida species, such as C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis (6). In 1995, C. dubliniensis, which is a species very closely related to C. albicans, was identified in cases of oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals (28). It is likely that C. dubliniensis strains have been and will continue to be identified as C. albicans, because both species share similar phenotypic characteristics such as formation of germ-tubes, production of chlamydoconidia in rice agar, biochemical pattern and same color of colonies on differential media CHROMagarTM Candida. C. dubliniensis is a species that can rapidly develop resistance to antifungal therapy. Therefore, patients who have received multiple treatments for fungal infections may be at increased risk of harboring C. dubliniensis as the predominant species in their oral cavities (15). If this ability of C. dubliniensis to develop stable fluconazole resistance in vitro also occurs rapidly in vivo, this may explain, at least in part, its recent emergence as an opportunistic pathogen in the oral cavities of HIV-infected individuals and AIDS patients, who are often treated with this drug (27).

Research in many laboratories is carried out to develop new drugs or drug delivery systems, but the development of approaches that allows quick and accurate identification of disease-causing yeasts is also necessary, especially because the incidence of human disease caused by the less common Candida species has increased.

Thus, the identification of Candida species is very important in the diagnostic laboratory, because such identification shows prognostic and therapeutical significance, allowing the early and correct antifungical therapy (11, 21). The purpose of this study was to identify isolates of Candida spp. by phenotypic and genotypic methods, discriminating C. albicans from other species of Candida.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples

Samples were obtained in 2004 from 38 adult patients, female or male, with oral candidosis assisted by the Stomatology Service of São Lucas Hospital of PUCRS. The diagnosis of candidosis was established according Holmstrup and Axell (12). Patients who have used antifungal drugs were excluded from the sample. All the patients signed an informed consent form to participate in the study, which was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

The samples were collected from the oral mucosa with sterile swabs, which were rubbed on the candidosis lesion. All samples were seeded on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA, Merck) with chloramphenicol (16 mg/mL, Neo Química). The plates were incubated at 30ºC for 48 h. Each morphological colony isolate was characterized according to Milan and Zaror (21). Three colonies with characteristics of Candida sp. were inoculated individually in yeast peptone dextrose (YPD, Sigma) broth and incubated at 30ºC for 48 h. After this period, each culture was individually stored at -20ºC with 20% glycerol. Only one sample of each isolate was used for all characterizations.

Germ-tube test

Yeast cells were inoculated into 0.5 mL of fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37°C for 2.5 h. After this period, aliquots were removed for microscopic examination (25). Germ tube was considered as a slender tube with straight walls, without septum and without constriction at the junction between the cells (10, 21). Germ-tube was indicative of C. albicans or C. dubliniensis. C. abicans ATCC 28367, C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 and C. krusei ATCC 6250 were used as reference strains.

Chlamydoconidia production test

Chlamydoconidia production test was performed using rice agar medium (10 g rice, 10 g bacteriological agar, and distilled water to a final adjusted volume of 1000 mL) supplemented by 8 mL of Tween 80. The samples previously grown in SDA were seeded as 3 parallel streaks in a rectangular piece of rice agar placed between two slides, incubated in wet chamber (8) at 30°C for 72 h and visualized in an optical microscope (10X and 40X magnification) (10). The formation of rounded spores with double-wall isolates was observed as chlamydoconidia, and was indicative of C. albicans or C. dubliniensis (22).

Chromogenic agar culture

Each isolate was cultured on SDA at 30°C for 48 h. After this, they were seeded on CHROMAgarTM Candida (Chromagar Microbiology) and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. The CHROMAgar™ allows selective yeast isolation, identifying colonies of C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis and C. krusei by morphology and color reaction (13). The strains were identified according to the manufacturer’s instructions, which define C. albicans or C. dubliniensis as green colonies, C. tropicalis as steel blue colonies, C. krusei colonies as showing rose color and rough aspect, and the other species as developing colonies from white to rose.

Carbohydrate assimilation test

The carbohydrate assimilation test determines the ability of a yeast isolate to use a particular carbohydrate substrate as its sole carbon in a medium. Yeasts were cultured in YPD for 24 h at 30°C. After, the cultures were centrifuged for 5 min at 2790 g and the pellets were washed 3 times successively, suspended in sterile saline and adjusted to 5 McFarland standard. A volume of 300 µL of Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB, Difco) and 1.5 mL of Candida spp. suspension were mixed to 30 mL of sterile bacteriological agar in Falcon tubes. The suspension was placed in 15 cm Petri dishes and after solidification of the medium, discs with the 2% carbohydrates (maltose, trehalose, xylose, galactose, lactose, sucrose and glucose) were placed following a guide. The suspension was incubated in 30°C for 96 h, and observed daily. Glucose was used as positive control, since all the species of Candida assimilate this carbohydrate (21). The carbohydrate assimilation was observed with a presence of a halo of growth around each carbohydrate.

Growth at 45°C

Growth at 45ºC has been considered a useful test for the differentiation of C. dubliniensis (no growth) from C. albicans (growth) (23). This test was used in the 24 positive samples for the germ-tube test, for chlamydoconidia production and that developed green colonies in CHROMAgarTM.

The temperature test was performed using YPD, Brain Heart infusion (BHI, Merck), SDA and Emmons medium (2% SDA). All samples were incubated at 45ºC, and growth was assessed daily for 10 days.

Tween 80 agar

Tween 80 agar (10 g peptone, 5 g NaCl, 0.1 g CaCl2, 1000 mL distilled water, 5 mL Tween 80, pH 6.8) was used to evaluate the lypolityc activity of the strains (24). The samples previously cultured in SDA at 30ºC for 24 h, which were indicative of C. albicans or C. dubliniensis, were transferred to Tween 80 agar by softly touching the colony with a sterile swab perpendicularly oriented towards the agar. The cultures were incubated at 30°C and evaluated daily, for 5 days. Esterase production was evidenced as the presence of a halo around the site of inoculation, observed with transmitted light after 2 to 3 days, being indicative of C. albicans (24).

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The pair of primers (5’TGTTGCTCTCTCGGGGGCGGC CG3’ and 5’ AGATCATTATGCCAACATCCTAGGTTAAA 3’) specific for the amplification of a fragment of the RNAr gene of C. albicans described by Mannarelli and Kurtzman (18) was used to confirm phenotypic identification of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis.

For Candida DNA extraction, an aliquot of pure culture was spread on SDA and a colony was collected and inoculated into 20 µL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The mixture was heated for 10 min in water bath at 100ºC and, after this period, heated in microwaves at high power for 2 min.

PCR amplifications were performed in a final volume of 25 µL containing 1 µL of lysed yeast cell, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM of each nucleotide (Amersham Biosciences), 0.02 mM of each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies), and 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). Amplifications were carried out in a MinicyclerTM Termocycler (MJ Research) using conditions modified from Mannarelli and Kurtzman (18). Reactions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 4 min. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel containing 5 μg/mL ethidium bromide using a 100-bp ladder (Amersham Biosciences) as molecular weight marker. All PCR used C. albicans ATCC 28367 as positive control and C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 as negative control.

RESULTS

A total of 63.2% (24/38) of strains were able to produce germ-tubes. Chlamydoconidia production was observed in 28/38 (73.7%) of the tested strains, and 24/38 (63.2%) showed green colonies in chromogenic medium, indicating C. albicans or C. dubliniensis (Table 1). To confirm these tests, the carbohydrate assimilation test was used in all 38 strains, and 24/38 (63.2%) were indicative of C. albicans or C. dubliniensis (Table 1). A total of 8 strains (21%), which were able neither to form germ-tube, neither to produce chlamydoconidia, were identified as C. krusei by CHROMagarTM Candida and carbohydrate assimilation tests. Five strains in 38 (13.2%) were indicative of C. tropicalis by the same tests. Of these 5 strains, 3 were positive for chlamydoconidia (7A, 34A and 44A), but they failed to produce germ-tube or to develop blue colonies in chromogenic agar, being thus incompatible with C. albicans. These results associated with carbohydrate assimilation tests indicated C. tropicalis as the probable species. One strain (8A) showed the ability to form germ-tube, and developed green colonies on chromogenic medium, but did not produce chlamydoconidia and was therefore classified as C. albicans. Moreover, its behavior in the carbohydrate assimilation test was compatible with this species (Table 1).

Table 1.

Identification of Candida spp. by germ-tube test (GT), chlamydoconidia production test (CH), culture in CHROMAgar™ Candida and carbohydrate assimilation test (CA)

Strain GT CH CHROMAgar TM CA
TRE1 XYL GLU GAL MAL LAC SUC Presumptive identification
5A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
6A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
7A - + steel blue + + + + + - + C. tropicalis
8A + - green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
12A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
13A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
15A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
27B + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
28B - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
33A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
34A - + steel blue + + + + + - + C. tropicalis
35B + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
38A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
40B - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
41A - - white to rose + + + + + - + Other species
42A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
43A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
44A - + steel blue + + + + + - + C. tropicalis
45A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
46A - + steel blue + + + + + - + C. tropicalis
47B + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
48A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
49A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
51A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
55A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
57A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
58A - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
59A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
60A - + steel blue + + + + + - + C. tropicalis
61A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
62A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
63A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
64A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
66A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
67A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
68A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
69A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
71A + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
C. albicans ATCC 28367 + + green + + + + + - + C. albicans or C. dubliniensis
C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 + + green + + + + + - + C. dubliniensis or C. albicans
C. krusei ATCC 6250 - - rose - - + - - - - C. krusei
1

TRE: Trehalose; XYL: Xylose; GLU: Glucose; GAL: Galactose; MAL: Maltose; LAC: Lactose; SUC: Sucrose

The results obtained for reference strains using growth at 45ºC test showed that this test was not reproducible, because a strain that grew in a culture medium at 45ºC did not grow in a subculture in the same medium. Also, a strain grew in a culture medium at 45ºC and did not grow in another one incubated at the same temperature. Thus, the strains isolated from patients were not tested by this assay.

Culture in Tween 80 agar identified 23/24 (95.8%) strains as C. albicans, and only one strain (64A) as C. dubliniensis.

The PCR produced a DNA fragment of 175 bp when tested with C. albicans ATCC 28367, and did not yield amplification products when the lysed cells of C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 were used. All 24 strains characterized phenotypically as C. albicans or C. dubliniensis were tested by PCR, being identified as C. albicans.

The phenotypic tests used in this study were not enough to identify strain 41A.

DISCUSSION

The phenotypic methods for the identification of Candida spp., although simple and inexpensive, impose some limitations. These methods are time-consuming and/or more often unable to discriminate C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. Therefore, the most reliable tests for rapid identification of Candida spp. and, especially, for differentiation between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis are based on molecular techniques. In the present study, all strains identified as C. albicans by PCR produced also germ-tubes. The germ-tube production test has the advantage to be simple and efficient in the economical and fast identification of C. albicans (8, 16). However, some results are liable to subjective interpretation, which makes necessary many repetitions, training and experience to discriminate germ-tube from pseudohyphae (6). Furthermore, although the germ-tubes cannot be quantified, a large amount is needed in a material to afford a diagnosis of C. albicans. Some authors evaluated sensitivity and specificity of the germ-tube test, finding results between 93 and 98.8%, and between 73.3 and 100%, respectively (5, 7, 10).

Chlamydoconidia production was observed in 73.7% of strains, with three strains (7A, 34A and 44A) not being identified as C. albicans by other phenotypic tests and PCR. These three strains developed blue color colonies in chromogenic agar and did not produce germ-tubes, being identified as C. tropicalis, since some strains of this species can produce chlamydoconidia. The production of chlamydoconidia by isolates from C. dubliniensis is unusual, but when produced, chlamydoconidia are observed in abundance and often in triplets or in contiguous pairs, which can also be observed in C. albicans (28, 29). The strain 8A showed the ability to form germ-tubes, behaved as C. albicans in CHROMagar™ medium, and showed a behavior characteristic of C. albicans in carbohydrate assimilation tests, but did not produce chlamydoconidia. The confirmation of this strain as C. albicans was obtained by PCR, and corroborates what described in the literature, as 10% of the strains of this species do not produce chlamydoconidia (21).

The strains that developed green colonies on CHROMagarTM Candida were identified as C. albicans by PCR. However, it is possible that if C. dubliniensis had been isolated, it would not have been discriminated from C. albicans by culture on chromogenic agar, since both species develop colonies of the same color. According to Milan and Zaror (21), there is a difference in the intensity of color of colonies between these species; C. albicans colonies are green-blue-pale, and C. dubliniensis dark-green. Yet, it is important to observe that this ability is lost after freezing of the samples, and it did not show reproducible results (21). Furthermore, some authors described that the dark-green color on CHROMagarTM Candida as phenotypic marker for C. dubliniensis cannot be generally adopted as criterion, and may be limited to primary cultures [Mähnß et al. (17); Tintelnot et al. (29). Moreover, C. albicans colonies can grow sharing a variation of green color, ranging from light-green to dark-green, depending on growth density and incubation period (10), often with the periphery of the colonies having a color distinctly different from that of the rest of the colony (26). However, Mesa et al. (20) observed that among 55 strains identified as C. albicans tested by CHROMagar™ medium, none showed the dark-green color typical of C. dubliniensis, indicating this medium as a good phenotypic criterion to differentiate both species.

The pattern of carbohydrate assimilation is considered a reliable test and is generally used for the correct identification of yeasts of clinical interest (14). The results obtained corroborated the identification of C. albicans or C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis and C. krusei. The assimilation pattern obtained would not be useful to differentiate between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans, if the former had been isolated from patients, since the xylose was assimilated by all strains suspected of being C. albicans or C. dubliniensis.

As the phenotypic tests mentioned above were not able to discriminate C. albicans and C. dubliniensis, the growth at 45ºC test and the observation of lipolytic activity was performed. The lipolytic activity test is simple, economical to conduct, and is easy to interpret, but it showed discrepancies as compared to the results obtained with PCR. One isolate (64A) was presumptively identified as C. dubliniensis, but the PCR identified this strain as C. albicans. An explanation for this could be the low viability of that sample, which presented problems to grow in subcultures after successive thawing. Moreover, the culture in Tween 80 agar can show lower sensitivity than PCR. The present results do not support the report of Slifkin (24), who describe that this test permitted the clear differentiation of the strains of C. albicans from the strains of C. dubliniensis within 3 days of incubation on Tween 80. The differentiation of C. albicans from C. dubliniensis by growth at 45ºC was not reproducible and showed conflicting results; therefore, the test could not be used for the differentiation between these species in the present study, as already indicated by Gales et al. (9). These authors showed that none of 66 C. dubliniensis isolates was able to grow at 45ºC, and 23 out of 100 C. albicans isolates were not able to grow at this temperature. This demonstrates that this test offers low specificity, and that C. albicans isolates could be falsely identified as C. dubliniensis. However, Pinjon et al. (23) describe this test as simple, reliable, inexpensive, reproducible, and readily applicable to large numbers of isolates.

The differentiation between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis remains a challenge for clinical microbiology laboratories. The most pronounced differences between these species are genetic, where C. dubliniensis is approximately 2.5% divergent from the C. albicans DNA sequence, as determined by DNA fingerprinting, karyotype analysis, and DNA sequence analysis of rRNA genes (17, 27). Sequence differences between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis have been potentially exploited in the design of oligonucleotide primers used in PCR, an approach which is increasingly being used in clinical laboratories. In this study, all 24 C. albicans or C. dubliniensis presumptively identified by phenotypic methods were confirmed as C. albicans by PCR using oligonucleotide primers specific for this species. The advantages of PCR include reproducibility, high sample volume throughput (27), relatively short processing time, high sensitivity and specificity, ability to detect low levels of yeasts from minimal sample volumes (30), ease to perform and it is available to most laboratories (18). The PCR procedure described here allowed the identification of C. albicans in less than 1 day, using a simple technique for obtaining DNA, using boiling and heating in microwaves, which helps to turn this method inexpensive, as commercial kits for DNA extraction are not necessary.

No single phenotypic test has proven to be highly effective in the distinction between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis, and genotypic tests may be necessary for definitive identification. The combination of some phenotypic methods can be useful for the presumptive identification of these species, but they would require a pure culture and 3-5 days or longer for a differentiation between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis isolates. Molecular methods can give definitive identification with one-day results and do not need previous cultures. Thus, the diagnostic can be made directly from the material collected from patients, providing valuable information for patient management.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

S. A. Marinho received a scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Financial support was provided by CNPq.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aheam D.G. The yeasts, a taxonomic study. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1998. Yeasts pathogenic for humans. pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beighton D., Ludford R., Clark D.T., et al. Use of CHROMagar Candida medium for isolation of yeasts from dental samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3025–7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.3025-3027.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Budtz-Jörgensen E. Etiology, pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48:61–9. doi: 10.3109/00016359009012735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Budtz-Jörgensen E. Histopathology, immunology, and serology of oral yeast infections. Diagnosis of oral candidosis. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48:37–43. doi: 10.3109/00016359009012732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Campbell C.K., Holmes A.D., Davey K.G., Szekely A., Warnock D.W. Comparison of a new chromogenic agar with the germ tube method for presumptive identification of Candida albicans. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infec Dis. 1998;17:367–8. doi: 10.1007/BF01709466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carrillo-Muñoz A.J., Quindós G., Cárdenes C.D., et al. Evaluation of Chromalbicans Agar for presumptive identification of Candida albicans. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001;18:105–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conceição G.C., Coelho P.P., Sousa Junior M.A., Pereira M.L., Miguel D.S.C.G., Toralles M.B.P. Avaliação do teste tubo germinativo em secreção vaginal a fresco para triagem de Candida albicans: um teste rápido. Newslab. 2005;73:106–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisher F., Cook N. Reagents, stains, media and methods. In: Fisher F., Cook N., editors. Fundamentals of diagnostic mycology. Saunders; 1998. pp. 320–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gales A.C., Pfaller M.A., Houston A.K., et al. Identification of Candida dubliniensis based on temperature and utilization of xylose and ß-methyl -D-glucoside as determined with the API 20C AUX and Vitek YBC systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3804–8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.12.3804-3808.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gatica J.L.M., Goic I.B., Martinez M.A.T., et al. Utilidad del agar cromocandida para el diagnostico diferencial de Candida spp aisladas de muestras vaginales. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2002;67:300–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Godoy P., Almeida L.P., Colombo A.L. Identificación de Candida albicans utilizando el medio cromogénico Albicans ID. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001;18:197–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holmstrup P., Axéll T. Classification and clinical manifestations of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48:57–9. doi: 10.3109/00016359009012734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hospenthal D.R., Beckius M.L., Floyd K.L., Horvath L.L., Murray C.K. Presumptive identification of Candida species other than C. albicans, C. krusei and C. tropicalis with the chromogenic medium CHROMagar Candida. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5:1–5. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussain Qadri S.M., Nichols C.W. Tube carbohydrate assimilation method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1978;165:19–27. doi: 10.1007/BF02121229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jabra-Rizk M.A., Baqui A., Kelley J.I., Falkler W.A.Jr., Merz W.G., Meiller T.F. Identification of Candida dubliniensis in a prospective study of patients in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:321–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.2.321-326.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lacaz C.S., Porto E., Martins J.E.C., et al. Leveduras de interesse médico. In: Lacaz C.S., Porto E., Martins J.E.C, Vaccari-Heins E.M., De Melo N.T., editors. São Paulo: Sarvier: Tratado de Micologia Médica.; 2002. pp. 123–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mähnß B., Stehr F., Schäfer W., Neuber K. Comparison of standard phenotypic assays with a PCR method to discriminate Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis. Mycoses. 2005;48:55–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.01054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mannarelli B.M., Kurtzman C.P. Rapid identification of Candida albicans and other human pathogenic yeasts by using short oligonucleoides in a PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1634–41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1634-1641.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martins C.A.P., Koga-Ito C.Y., Jorge A.O.C. Presence of Staphylococcus spp. and Candida spp. in the human oral cavity. Braz J Microbiol. 2002;33:236–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mesa L.M., Arcaya N., Cañas O., Machado Y., Calvo B. Evaluación de los caracteres fenotípicos para diferenciar Candida albicans de Candida dubliniensis. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2004;21:135–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Milan E.P., Zaror L. Leveduras: identificação laboratorial. In: Sidrim J.J.C., Rocha M.F.G., editors. Micologia Médica à luz de autores contemporâneos. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2004. pp. 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Paula C.C. Candidíases. In: Zaitz C., Campbell I., Marques A.S., Ruiz L.R., Souza V.M., editors. Compêndio de micologia médica. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1998. pp. 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pinjon E., Sullivan D., Salkin I., Shanley D., Coleman D. Simple, inexpensive, reliable method for differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2093–95. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.7.2093-2095.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Slifkin M. Tween 80 test responses of various Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4626–28. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.12.4626-4628.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Souza V.M. Técnicas laboratoriais utilizadas em micologia médica. In: Zaitz C., Campbell I., Marques A.S., Ruiz L.R., Souza V.M., editors. Compêndio de micologia médica. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1998. pp. 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stenderup A. Oral mycology. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48:3–10. doi: 10.3109/00016359009012728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sullivan D, Coleman D. Candida dubliniensis: characteristics and identification. J Clin Microbiol. 36:329–34. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.2.329-334.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sullivan D., Westerneng T.J., Haynes K.A., Bennett D.E., Coleman D.C. Candida dubliniensis:sp. nov.: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology. 1995;141:1507–21. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-7-1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tintelnot K., Haase G., Seibold M., et al. Evaluation of phenotypic markers for selection and identification of Candida dubliniensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1599–608. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.4.1599-1608.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wahyuningsih R., Freisleben H.J., Sonntag H.G., Schnitzler P. Simple and rapid detection of Candida albicans DNA in serum by PCR for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3016–21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.3016-3021.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES