Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2006 Jun 30;34(2):61–66. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2006.34.2.061

Characteristics of Hypovirulent Strains of Chestnut Blight Fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, Isolated in Korea

Sang Hyun Lee 1, Byung Ju Moon 2, Jong Kyu Lee 3,
PMCID: PMC3769549  PMID: 24039472

Abstract

Chestnut blight disease caused by Cryphonectria parasitica is widely distributed throughout chestnut tree plantations in Korea. We surveyed 65 sites located at 9 provinces in South Korea, and isolated 248 virulent and 3 hypovirulent strains of chestnut blight fungus. Hypovirulent strains had dsRNA virus in the cytoplasm, which is one of the typical characteristics of hypovirulent strains. In addition, they showed more characteristics of hypovirulent strains, i.e., suppressed conidiation, reduced pigmentation in colony color, and reduced phenol oxidase activity as well as reduced pathogenicity. Hypovirulent strains, KCPH-22, KCPH-135 and KCPH-136, had a genomic dsRNA band with the molecular weight of 12.7 kb, which is the L-dsRNA of CHV1. They also had a 2.7 kb defective dsRNA band. Single conidia isolated from hypovirulent strains were cultured and various phenotypes and absence of dsRNA bands were obtained from single conidial cultures, which means that hypovirulence transmission is unstable in asexual reproduction and variations in viral heredity by asexual reproduction. Biocontrol trial using hypovirulent strains was also carried out in the chestnut tree plantations, and canker expansion in the treated trees was stopped and healed by callus formation at the margin of the canker. These results show the potentials in successful biocontrol of chestnut blight if the vegetatively compatible hypovirulent strains could be directly used around the canker formed by compatible virulent strains.

Keywords: Biocontrol, Chestnut blight, Cryphonectria parasitica, dsRNA virus, Hypovirulent, Phenol oxidase activity, Viral heredity to conidia progeny


Chestnut trees are economically important trees, whose fruits are delicious and contain many nutrients, and they are distributed all over the areas in Korea. Many tree seedlings were transplanted from the end of the 1960's to middle of the 1970's in Korea. Planted area was approximately 79,000 ha in 1999 and the total amount of production was estimated up to 10,000 ton. Total amount of exported fruits of chestnut tree from Korea to other countries was 27,029 (M/T) in 1999 (Korea Forest Service, 2004). Thus, chestnut production is making a great contribution to the increase of income in the forest area. However, losses in chestnut production by the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, were increased gradually because of the lacking of the proper disease management strategy. So far, C. parasitica was known to be a major pathogen of chestnut blight in Korea, even though many stem blights caused by the pathogens such as Botryosphaeria, Cryptodiaporthe, Endothia, Diaporthe and Pseudovasella, had been reported.

Since chestnut blight caused by C. parasitica was first reported in New York Zoological Garden in America in 1904, and destroyed chestnut forestry field of East America (Griffin et al., 1983, 1991; Roane and Griffin, 1986), the pathogen has been spread to Europe and caused serious damage. In Korea, the disease was first reported as chestnut stem blight in 1925, and researches were limited in the field such as pathogens distribution, physiology, and ecology.

In 1964, hypovirulence was first discovered in Italy (Grente, 1965), and then this phenomenon was known to be associated with double stranded RNA in the cytoplasm of the pathogen (Day et al., 1977). Virulent (V) strain was converted to hypovirulent (H) strain by the transmission of dsRNA virus in hypovirulent strain through hyphal anastomosis between V and H strains (Elliston, 1985; Fulbright, 1984). Based on this mechanism, hypovirulent strains were used to control blight in Europe and America, and successful control was reported by the introduction of hypovirulent strain on diseased part in Italy and France (Heiniger and Rigling, 1994). Hypovirulence altered colony morphology, reduced conidial formation, oxalate accumulation, laccase production and pigmentation. The main objectives of this study were to isolate the hypovirulent strains in Korea, to compare their cultural characteristics including phenol oxidase activity with virulent ones, to detect dsRNA virus and convert virulent strains into hypovirulent by hyphal fusion, to investigate hypovirus transmission to conidia progeny, and to try biocontrol on the chestnut trees in the field.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of fungal strains, and comparison in their cultural characteristics

C. parasitica was isolated from natural cankers on stem and twig infected with chestnut blight. Bark tissues were removed with sterilized cork borer (5 mm dia.) and placed on water agar (WA). After incubating for 2~3 days, mycelial plugs were removed from mycelial margin and then transferred on fresh PDA. The plates were kept at 25℃ for 3 days. For cultural characteristics, radial mycelial growth on PDA were measured at 7 days after incubation (Anagnostakis and Aylor, 1984). For testing phenol oxidase activity, the strains were grown on modified Bavendamm's medium (0.5% tannic acid, 1.5% Difco malt extract, 2% Difco bacto agar, pH 4.5 adjusted with 1 N NaOH), and kept at 25℃. Mycelial growth and changes of colors were checked 4 days after incubation (Rigling et al., 1989) (Lee et al., 1991b).

Virulence of the isolated strains

For testing virulence of the isolated strains, excised stems were harvested from 3 different chestnut cultivars, i.e., Daebo (resistant), Eunki (moderate), and American (susceptible) chestnut. Stems were cut into 2.5 cm long sections, and the bark and wood tissue were separated using forceps. An agar plug (5 mm in diameter) was placed on the center of inner bark tissue section. Samples were then incubated in the dark at 25℃ on moistened filter papers inside petri dishes. After 4 days, the zone containing brown, necrotic areas was measured, and the elliptical necrotic area was calculated (Lee et al., 1992).

Detection of double stranded RNA(dsRNA) virus and hypovirulence conversion

DsRNA was extracted by modified methods (Day et al., 1977). Mycelial disc (4mm) was placed on cellophane-covered PDAmb. Mycelium was harvested from cellophane-covered PDAmb after 4 days, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then ground with mortar and pestle. Total nucleic acid was extracted with 6ml of a mixture of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25 : 24 : 1, v/v/v). The aqueous phage was adjusted to 15% ethanol and dsRNA was purified by chromatography on cellulose CF-11. To confirm the nature of the dsRNA with silver stain, gel was washed in 400 ml distilled water for 15 min, removed water, decolorized in pretreatment solution (80 ml methanol: 20 ml ethanol : 90 ml distilled water: 10 ml rinsing solution, v/v) with shaking for 10 min, and the remaining water was removed by aspirator. The dsRNA virus bands were visualized by Silver Stain Plus Kit (Bio-Rad) (Dodds, 1993). Hypovirulence conversion was performed by placing one plug of virulent strain (KCPV-19) 5 mm apart from one of a vegetatively compatible hypovirulent strain (KCPH-22) on fresh PDA, and incubating at 25~27℃ for 3~7 days. Conversion of virulent strain into hypovirulent one was confirmed by changes of colony morphology and dsRNA analysis (Lee et al., 1991a; Anagnostakis and Day, 1979).

Viral heredity to conidia progeny in hypovirulent strains

Single conidia were isolated from the culture of hypovirulent strains. Same phenotypes of single conidial cultures were grouped, and dsRNA banding patterns were analyzed for viral heredity in asexual reproduction (Anagnostakis et al., 1998; Scibilia and Shain, 1989).

Biocontrol trial of chestnut blight by hypovirulence

After inoculation of the fungal mycelial plugs of virulent strain (KCPV-19), hypovirulent strain (KCPH-22) was inoculated at 4 weeks after inoculation. Chestnut blight canker was investigated and measured at 5 more weeks after inoculation. Fungi were re-isolated from the canker area, and dsRNA banding patterns were compared with those of original hypoviulent strains.

Results and Discussion

Isolation of fungal strains, and comparison in their cultural characteristics

Two hundreds and fifty one strains of chestnut blight fungus were isolated from natural cankers on stem and twig infected with chestnut blight. Among these isolates, KCP-9 and KCP-19 were selected as representatives of virulent strains, while KCP-22, KCP-135, and KCP-136 were selected as those of hypovirulent strains based on cultural characteristics, pathogenicity, and the presence of dsRNA virus (Table 1). Hypovirulent strains showed abnormal morphology, reduced conidiation, and reduced mycelial growth as compared with normal virulent strains on culture medium (Fig. 1). Color reactions on Bavendamm media, which indicate phenol oxidase activity, showed that virulent strains (V) turned this medium dark brown, while hypovirulent stains (H) produced lighter yellow to brown (Table 2).

Table 1.

Strains of Cryphonectria parasitica isolated from chestnut trees and used in this study

graphic file with name mb-34-61-i001.jpg

1)KCP : Korean strains of C. parasitica.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Colony morphology of virulent (A and B) and hypovirulent (C, D, and E) strains of chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, on PDA medium.

Table 2.

Comparison of virulent and hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica in mycelial growth and phenol oxidase activity

graphic file with name mb-34-61-i002.jpg

1)+++ : good growth, ++ : fairly good growth, + : poor growth.

2)++ : dark brown, - : yellowish brown.

Virulence of the isolated strains

Necrotic areas on both bark and wood tissues, which indicate the virulence of strain, were relatively small by the inoculation of hypovirulent strains (KCPH-22, KCPH-135, and KCPH-136) as compared to those by virulent strain (KCPV-9). In addition, the necrotic areas on the bark/wood tissues were generally increased depending on the susceptibility of the cultivars. Eunki, a susceptible cultivar, and American chestnut (Castanea dentata), a highly susceptible species, showed the distinct differences in virulence between hypovirulent and virulent strains by the artificial inoculation (Fig. 2A, 2B). The results of the virulence test on the bark and wood tissues had shown the same tendancy, but the results on bark tissue are more clear than these results on wood tissue in discriminating hypovirulent from virulent strains.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Virulence test of virulent (V) and hypovirulent (H) strains of Cryphonectria parasitica on (A) bark tissue and (B) wood tissue excised from resistant (Daebo), moderate (Eunki), and susceptible (Castanea dentata) cultivars. The same letter on the bar within each cultivar is not significantly (p = 0.05) different by Duncan multiple range test.

Detection of double stranded RNA(dsRNA) virus and hypovirulence conversion

Hypovirulent strains, KCPH-22, KCPH-135 and KCPH-136, had a genomic dsRNA band in the cytoplasm with the molecular weight of 12.7kb, and a defective dsRNA band with the molecular weight of 2.7 kb (Fig. 3). Conclusively, three hypovirulent strains examined had Cryphonectria Hypovirus 1 (CHV1) in the cytoplasm. Hypovirulence was successfully converted by cross pairing of a virulent strain (KCPV-19) with a vegetatively compatible hypovirulent strain (KCPH-22). Colony morphology of virulent strain was changed into those of hypovirulent by the transmission of dsRNA virus, and then the conversion was finally confirmed by the presence of dsRNA virus band through electrophoresis (Fig. 4 and 5).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

DsRNA banding patterns of Cryphonectria parasitica. Lanes 1 and 2 : virulent strains, Lanes 3~5 : hypovirulent strains.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Colony morphology of hypovirulent, virulent, and converted hypovirulent strains on PDA medium. A: KCPH-22 (hypovirulent), B: KCPV-19 (virulent), C: KCPV-19(H) (converted hypovirulent).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

DsRNA banding patterns of hypovirulent, virulent, and converted hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica. Lane 1: KCPH-22 (hypovirulent strain), Lane 2: KCPV-19 (virulent strain), Lane 3: KCPV-19 (H) (converted hypovirulent strain).

Viral heredity to conidia progeny in hypovirulent strains

Various phenotypes and the absence of dsRNA bands were obtained from single conidial cultures of hypovirulent strain, which means that hypovirulence transmission is unstable in asexual reproduction (Fig. 6A, 6B, 6C). Single conidial isolates from three hypovirulent strains, KCPH-22, KCPH-135 and KCPH 136, were consistently yield five distinct phenotypes by both colony color and morphology: A type (colony with white color and smooth margin), B type (colony with white color and typical morphology), C type (colony with white color and irregular margins), D type (colony looks like virulent strains), E type (colony with yellow color and irregular margins). DsRNA virus was stably detected from the conidia progeny of only one hypovirulent strain (KCPH-135), but was not stable from the other two strains (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Diversity in colony morphology of single conidial isolates from three hypovirulent strains. I: KCPH-22, II: KCPH-135, III: KCPH-136.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

DsRNA banding patterns of single conidial cultures isolated from 3 hypovirulent strains (KCPH-22, 135, and 136). Single conidial isolates were grouped into five different cultural phenotypes (A, B, C, D, E), and dsRNA banding patterns of two single conidial isolates for each phenotype were representatively compared.

Biocontrol trial of chestnut blight by hypovirulence

Inoculation of virulent strain (KCPV-19) caused canker with brown discoloration on wood tissue, and produced sometimes yellowish brown pycnidia protruding from bark tissue. In contrast, inoculation of hypovirulent strain (KCPH-22) at the margin of cankers, which were artificially formed by inoculating mycelial plugs of virulent strain, stopped the expansion of canker formation, and healed cankers by developing callus on the bark tissue at the margin of canker (Fig. 8). Healing of cankers can be explained by the transmission of dsRNA virus from the hypovirulent strain to the virulent strain, and finally converted into hypovirulent. This hypothesis was proved by the detection of dsRNA virus from 3 bark tissues collected randomly at the margin of cankers. These results show the potentials in successful biocontrol of chestnut blight if the vegetatively compatible hypovirulent strains could be directly used around the canker formed by compatible virulent strains.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Biocontrol trial of chestnut blight in the field experiment. Hypovirulent strain (KCPH-22) was inoculated (arrows) at 4 weeks after inoculation of virulent strain. Canker expansion was stopped and healed by callus formation with 5 more weeks after inoculation of hypovirulent strain.

References

  • 1.Anagnostakis SL, Aylor DE. The effect of temperature on growth of Endothia (Cryphonectria) parasitica in vitro and in vivo. Mycologia. 1984;76:387–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anagnostakis SL, Chen B, Geletka LM, Nuss DL. Hypovirus transmission to ascospore progeny by field-released transgenic hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology. 1998;88:598–604. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.7.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anagnostakis SL, Day PR. Hypovirulence conversion in Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology. 1979;69:1226–1229. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Day PR, Dodds JA, Elliston JE, Jaynes RA, Anagnostakis SL. Double-stranded RNA in Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology. 1977;67:1393–1396. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dodds JA. dsRNA in diagnosis. In: Matthews REF, editor. Diagnosis of Plant Virus Diseases. Boca Raton: CRC press; 1993. pp. 273–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elliston JE. Characteristics of dsRNA-free and dsRNA-containing strains of Endothia parasitica in relation to hypovirulence. Phytopathology. 1985;75:151–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fulbright DW. Effect of eliminating dsRNA in hypovirulent Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology. 1984;74:722–724. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grente J. Les formes hypovirulentes d'Endothia parasitica et les espoires de lutte contre le chancre du chataignier. Acad Agric. France. 1965:1033–1036. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Griffin GJ, Hebard FV, Wendt RW, Elkins JR. Survival of American chestnut trees: Evaluation of blight resistance and virulent in Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology. 1983;73:1084–1092. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Griffin GJ, Smith HC, Dietz A, Elkins JR. Importance of hardwood competition to American chestnut survival, growth, and blight development in forest clear-cuts. Can J Bot. 1991;69:1804–1809. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Heiniger U, Rigling D. Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1994;32:581–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Korea Forest Service. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. 2004;Vol. 34 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee JK, Tattar TA, Berman PM, Mount MS. Vegetative compatibility and hypovirulence conversion of Cryphonectria parasitica on American chestnut trees in Massachusetts (Abstr.) Phytopathology. 1991a;81:1206. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee JK, Tattar TA, Berman PM, Mount MS. Comparison of Cryphonectria parasitica strains from Massachusetts in cultural characteristics, pathogenicity, and phenol oxidase activity. (Abstr.) Phytopathology. 1991b;81:1206–1207. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee JK, Tattar TA, Berman PM, Mount MS. A rapid method for testing the virulence of Cryphonectria parasitica using excised bark and wood of American chestnut. Phytopathology. 1992;82:1454–1456. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee SH, Park JY, Kim KH, Lee JK. Characteristics of hypovirulent strains of chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, isolated in Korea. Proc. of the 3rd International Chestnut Congress. Acta Horticulture. 2005;693:611–616. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rigling D, Heiniger U, Hohl HR. Reduction of lac-case activity in dsRNA-containing hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria (Endothia) parasitica. Phytopathology. 1989;79:219–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roane MK, Griffin GJ. Chestnut blight, other Endothia diseases, and the genus Endothia. APS Press; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Scibilia KL, Shain L. Protection of American chestnut with hypovirulent conidia of Cryphonectria (Endothia) parasitica. Plant Dis. 1989;73:840–843. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang K, Shao J, Lu J. Differentiation of virulence of Cryphonectria parasitica, the pathogen of chestnut blight. J Fruit Sci. 1993;10:25–28. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES