Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2009 Jun 1;40(2):231–233. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000200004

Identification of Mycobacterium bovis Isolates by a multiplex PCR

Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo 1,3, Flávia Galindo Silvestre 3, Wilma Neres Campos 3, Leone Vinícius Furlanetto 3, Luciana Medeiros 2, Walter Lilenbaum 2, Leila Sousa Fonseca 1, Joab Trajano Silva 1, Vânia Margaret Flosi Paschoalin 1,*
PMCID: PMC3769727  PMID: 24031349

Abstract

Isolates from suggestive bovine tuberculosis lesions were tested by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) targeting for RvD1Rv2031c and IS6110 sequences, specific for M. bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex respectively. The m-PCR successfully identified as M. bovis 88.24% of the isolates.

Keywords: Mycobacterium bovis, multiplex-PCR, bovine tuberculosis


Several PCR systems have been developed for the detection of species belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC). The most commonly used one is based on primers that amplify segments of the IS6110 element, particularly targeting for the 123 bp (2) and 245 bp fragments (7). Another PCR system that yield successful identification of M. bovis isolates is focused on the amplification of a 500-bp DNA fragment inside the RvD1Rv2031c genomic sequence (4).

A combination of conventional culture and biochemical techniques is the gold standard method currently used for the identification of M. bovis, which is laborious and time-consuming. In this study we carry out the molecular identification of pure cultures of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) isolated from suggestive bovine tuberculosis lesions. The molecular assay consists of a single-step multiplex PCR (m-PCR), based on two set primers already tested that yet to date have not been combined in a single PCR system. In this study, the assay targets simultaneously the RvD1Rv2031c and IS6110 sequences, aiming to identify bacteria as MTC members as well as to distinguish M. bovis isolates from other members of this complex.

A dairy herd from Macaé City (Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil), with a previous history of bovine tuberculosis (TB) was studied. Among the 50 adult cows from this herd tested by intradermal tuberculin test according to official standards (1), 34 animals were reactive, euthanized and necropsied. During the necropsy, a total of 91 samples of lymph nodes and lungs were collected, although not all the animals presented typical lesions. Samples were transported under refrigeration to the Mycobacteriology Laboratory (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) and tissues of each animal were processed together as one pooled sample per animal, totaling 34 samples. Samples were decontaminated using the Petroff method, inoculated on slopes of Lowenstein-Jensen medium with sodium pyruvate and incubated for three months at 37ºC. After growth, AFB-positive colonies were screened by m-PCR. Briefly, the mycobacterial DNA was extracted as described previously (3). m-PCR was performed in a reaction mix (50 µL) containing 5 µl of 10 × PCR buffer ((Invitrogen®), 200 µM dNTP (GE Healthcare®), 2.5 U of recombinant Taq polymerase (Invitrogen®), 0.2 µM of each primer (Invitrogen®) JB21 (5’-TCGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC3’) and JB22 (5’-CGTCCGCTGACCTC AAGAAAG-3’) (4) and INS1 (5’-CGTGAGGGCATCGAGGTGGC-3’) and INS2 (5’-GCGTAGGCGTCGGTGACAAA-3’) (10) , 2.0 mM MgCl2, and 5 µL of purified DNA template. Amplification was carried out in a GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (Applied Biosystems®)with the following cycling parameters: 94ºC for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94ºC, 1 min at 68ºC and 1 min at 72ºC, with a final extension at 72ºC for 7 min. PCR products were checked by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (10 µg/mL). Negative samples were analyzed by PCR-restriction analysis (PRA), using primers Tb11 (5’-ACCAA CGATGGTGTGTCCA T-3’) and Tb12 (5’-CTTGTCGAACC GCATACCCT-3’) targeting for the hsp65 gene (6). The amplification products were digested with BstE II and HaeIII and the resulting fragments were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide.

Mycobacteria colonies were isolated in Lowenstein-Jensen medium with sodium pyruvate from 17 out 34 (50%) processed samples, therefore confirming the infection. This herd was TB-free in the last testing, performed six months before the study. Therefore, we believe that the reactive cows presented a recent infection, where visible lesions are not always present and the bacterial load is low. Considering the employed decontamination method, it is not surprising that not all cultures yielded M.bovis. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy to observe that the presence of some positive cultures is sufficient to characterize the outbreak of TB in this herd.

In those 17 isolates, m-PCR successfully amplified both target regions (the 500 bp fragment specific for M. bovis and the 245 bp fragment diagnostic for MTBC) in 15 of them (88.24%) (Fig. 1, lanes 1-15). The two (11.76%) m-PCR-negative isolates (Fig. 1, lanes 16 and 17) were confirmed by PCR-restricition analysis as Mycobacterium sp, but not included into Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (results not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Identification of ABF isolates by m-PCR. DNA extracted from seventeen different acid-fast bacilli isolates was used as template for m-PCR amplification of the RvD1Rv2031c and the IS6110 sequences. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide (10 μg/mL). Lane M: 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas®); lanes 1-17 m-PCR products of acid-fast bacilli isolated from suggestive BT lesions; lane 18 negative control. Arrows indicate the position of the fragments of 500 bp (diagnostic for M. bovis) and 245 bp (diagnostic for MTBC members).

PCR using primers JB21/JB22 has been considered to be highly reliable in identifying M. bovis isolates, presenting 100% concordance with the conventional microbiological method (4). However, the absolute specificity of JB21/JB22 primers to M. bovis has been disputed by other study that reported that 13.3% (4/30) of M. bovis isolates failed to produce the 500bp fragment (5). Using specific primers for IS6110 sequence, the 500 bpnegatives isolates were identified as belonged to the MTC leading the authors to suggest that those isolates may lack the genomic target for JB21/JB22 primes. As this genotypic characteristic may not be so infrequent, the use of a single primer pair can produce false negative results. On the other hand, an additional primer pair targeting for a different sequence, as in m-PCR, minimizes the occurrence of such false negative results.

In the present study, we used two set of primers already described in the literature (4,10) therefore, for the first time, they were combined to optimize a mPCR assay able to identify unequivocally M. bovis among mycobacterial isolates. The mPCR method is fast, reproducible and useful for the study of slow-growing mycobacteria, particularly in cultures where the small number of bacilli hinders identification by classical methods. It also can be a valuable tool for the rapid identification of acid-fast bacilli isolated from suggestive bovine TB lesions.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge the financial support from FAPERJ, FAPEMAT, CAPES and CNPq.

RESUMO

Identificação de colônias isoladas de Mycobacterium bovis por PCR múltipla

Colônias isoladas a partir de lesões sugestivas de tuberculose bovina foram testadas pela reação múltipla em cadeia da polimerase, usando oligonucleotídeos direcionados para as seqüências genômicas RvD1Rv2031c e IS6110, específicas para M. bovis e para o complexo Mycobacterium tuberculosis, respectivamente. A m-PCR identificou, com sucesso, 88,24% das colônias isoladas como M. bovis.

Palavras-chave: Mycobacterium bovis, PCR-múltipla, tuberculose bovina

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brasil Instrução normativa SDA. 2004. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regulamento Técnico do Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação da Brucelose e Tuberculose. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eisenach K.D., Cave M.D., Bates J.H., Crawford J.T. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1990;161:977–81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.5.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meikle V., Scneider M., Azenzo G., Zumárraga M., Magnano G., Cataldi A. Individual animals of a cattle herd infect with the same Mycobacterium bovis genotype shows important variations in bacteriological, histophathological and immune response parameters. Zoonoses Public Health. 2007;54:86–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodríguez J.G., Fissanoti J.C., Del Portillo P., Patarroyo M.E., Romano M.I., Cataldi A. Amplification of a 500-basepair fragment from cultured isolates of Mycobacterium bovis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999;37:2330–2332. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.7.2330-2332.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sechi L.A., Dupre I., Leori G., Fadda G., Zanetti S. Distribution of a specific 500-base-pair fragment in Mycobacterium bovis isolates from Sardinian cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38:3837–3839. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.10.3837-3839.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Telenti A., Marchesi F., Balz M., Bally F., Bottger E.C., Bodmer T. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:175–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.175-178.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hermans P.W., Van Soolingen D., Dale J.W., Schuitema A.R., Mcadam R A., Catty D., Van Embden J.D. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J. Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2051–2058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.2051-2058.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES