Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2010 Dec 1;41(4):1079–1081. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220100004000028

Comparison of the worldwide transmissible Pseudomonas aeruginosa with isolates from brazilian cystic fibrosis patients

Robson Souza Leão 1, Ana Paula D Carvalho-Assef 2, Alex Guerra Ferreira 1, Tânia Wrobel Folescu 3, Afonso Luís Barth 4, Tyrone Leslie Pitt 5, Elizabeth Andrade Marques 1,*
PMCID: PMC3769756  PMID: 24031589

Abstract

Cross-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa among cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is a rare occurrence. However, the emergence of transmissible strains has been reported between unrelated individuals. We analyzed the genetic relationship among P. aeruginosa isolates from Brazilian CF patients and transmissible clones which are worldwide spread. The data does not indicate the presence of closely related variant clones.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Epidemic strain, Cystic fibrosis


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of chronic pulmonary infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). These infections contribute considerably for morbidity and mortality of CF patients due to an intense host inflammatory response which leads to an irreversible loss of lung function (7). Many studies indicate that the same CF patients may harbour distinct strains in their respiratory tract, suggesting that may be a relatively high heterogeneity of strains of P. aeruginosa in the CF pulmonary microbiota . It is also known that chronic CF patients are colonized by unique strains, and cross-infection was considered to be rare (11). More recently, the emergence of transmissible P. aeruginosa has been reported with increasing frequency among unrelated individuals which constitute an emerging threat to patients with CF (3,5). The presence of common clones circulating among different CF patients was described in Europe and the United States of America (1, 6). The first major transmissible P. aeruginosa CF strain (Liverpool Epidemic Strain – “LES”) was identified in Liverpool - UK (1), where it occasionally “superinfected” individuals and eventually replaced their original strains (6). Moreover, the “Midlands 1” strain was originally isolated in Birmingham - UK and was identified as the second most common clone in the UK (10). A multiresistant transmissible strain (“Manchester clone”) has also been identified in adults at a CF treatment center in Manchester - UK (2).

Although the presence of transmissible strains of P. aeruginosa is not related to increased morbidity, it may lead to treatment burden for infected patient in contrast to the patients who harbor anunique, non-transmissible strains (9). Römling et al. (8) have reported the spread of an epidemic clone (clone C) with dissemination over several countries on two continents with higher prevalence in the aquatic environment and with the potential to infect CF patients. The occurrence of these transmissible strains has provoked debate on infection control issues and the management of CF patients. It remains controversial, however, whether patients harboring transmissible strains of P. aeruginosa should be segregated from those colonized with non-transmissible strains. This study consisted of a analysis of the genetic relationship of P. aeruginosa isolates from Brazilian CF patients and the transmissible strains which are spread worldwide. A total of 179 P. aeruginosa from 20 CF patients were investigated. The clinical isolates were recovered from adult and paediatric CF patients admitted at the Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (HUPE) and at the Instituto Fernandes Figueira (IFF FioCruz), respectively, two reference centres for cystic fibrosis treatment located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All patients presented chronic respiratory infection due to P. aeruginosa. Initially, we have employed RAPD-PCR, using the primer 208 – 5’ ACGGCCGACC 3’(4). We found 49 different profiles among the 179 clinical isolates indicating a considerable genetic heterogeneity. Nevertheless, we have observed, eventually, the presence of the same strain in different patients. We have selected one isolated belonging to each of the 49 RAPD profiles for the second stage of the study which consisted of PFGE following digestion of intact genomic DNA with SpeI (Roche Indianapolis IN USA) as previously described (10). DNA fragment analysis was performed with BioNumerics version 5.3 (Applied Maths, St. Marten-Latem, Belgium) and clusters were defined using the Dice coefficient of similarity. UPGMA dendrograms were drawn with a position tolerance of 1.00% and optimization of 1.00%. The following transmissible strains were compared with the clinical isolates: “clone C” (8), “LES” (1), “Manchester” (2) and “Midlands” (10). No similarity were found among the Brazilian clinical CF isolates and the transmissible strains from other countries. It has to be considered that the population of CF patients evaluated in this study is representative of only two hospitals in Brazil and, therefore, a national surveillance is warranted to confirm the presence or absence of transmissible P. aeruginosa strains among CF patients in Brazil. Strain typing is important for the detection of sources or routes of infections, identification between endemic and epidemic strains and prevention of transmission between patients. We have observed that there is no genetic relatedness among the P.aeruginosa from CF patients from Rio de Janeiro - Brazil, when compared with the widespread clones of P. aeruginosa from CF patients around the world.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are deeply indebted to Dr Jane Turton from Laboratory of HealthCare Associated for valuable suggestions for the processing of samples during PFGE testing. We also wish to thank Daniel Cohen Goldemberg from the Health Protection Agency and University College London for his scientific input and comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for providing a research grant.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cheng K., Smyth R.L., Govan J.R.W., Doherty C., Winstanley C., Denning N., Heat DP., van Salne H., Hart C.A. Spread of β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a cystic fibrosis clinic. Lancet. 1996;348(7):639–642. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones A.M., Govan J.R., Doherty C.J., Dodd M.E., Isalska B.J., Stanbridge T.N., Weeb A.K. Spread of multiresistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an adult cystic fibrosis clinic. Lancet. 2001;358(18):557–558. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05714-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lewis D.A., Jones A., Parkhill J., Speert D.P., Govan J.R.W., Lipuma J.J., Lory S., Webb A.K., Mahenthiralingam E. Identification of DNA markers for a transmissible Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis strain. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2005;33(1):56–64. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0352OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mahenthiralingam E., Maureen E., Campbell J.F., Foster S., Joseph S.L., Speert S.P. Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996;34(5):1129–1135. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1129-1135.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manos J., Arthur J., Rose B., Tingpej P., Fung C., Curtis M., Webb J.S., Hu H., Kjelleberg S., Gorrell M.D., Bye P., Harbour C. Transcriptome analyses and biofilm-forming characteristics of a clonal Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the cystic fibrosis lung. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008;57(12):1451–1465. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.2008/005009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCallum S.J., Corkill J., Gallagher M., Ledson M.J., Hart C.A., Walshaw M.J. Superinfection with a transmissible strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults with cystic fibrosis chronically colonised by P. aeruginosa. Lancet. 2001;358(9281):558–560. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05715-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ratjen FA. Cystic Fibrosis: pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Respir Care. 2009;54(5):595–605. doi: 10.4187/aarc0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Römling U., Kader A., Sriramulu D.D., Simm R., Kronvall G. Worldwide distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone C strains in the aquatic environment and cystic fibrosis patients. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;7(7):1029–1038. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Römling U., Wingender J., Müller H., Tümmler B. A major Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone common to patients and aquatic habitats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60(6):1734–1738. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.1734-1738.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scott F.W., Pitt T.L. Identification and characterization of transmissible Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in cystic fibrosis patients in England and Wales. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004;53(7):609–615. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45620-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Silbert S., Barth A.L., Safer H. Heterogeneity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Brazilian Cystic Fibrosis Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;14(11):3976–3981. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3976-3981.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES