Abstract
This study assessed biofilm formation on polystyrene by Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, L. welshimeri and Escherichia coli, isolated from a slaughtering plant, grown on tryptic soy broth (TSB) using different glucose concentrations. The tested bacteria produced biofilm in at least one of the concentrations used, and some of them were strong biofilm producers.
Keywords: Listeria, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, biofilm, polystyrene
INTRODUCTION
A biofilm is a population of microbial cells growing on a surface and enclosed in an amorphous extracellular matrix. Biofilm formed in food processing environments is of special importance as it has the potential to act as a chronic source of microbial contamination that may lead to food spoilage or transmission of diseases, and bacteria in biofilms exhibit enhanced resistance to cleaning and sanitation (12).
Formation and presence of biofilm have been investigated by different quantification methods, among which the microtiter plate system is widely used (1, 12, 14). Microtiter plate systems for quantifying biofilm formation have been investigated using many different organisms and stains (1, 2, 13).
Therefore, this study assessed biofilm formation on polystyrene plates by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and L. welshimeri isolated from the cutting room of a slaughtering plant and grown on tryptic soy broth (TSB) using different glucose concentrations.
This study was conducted in the cutting room of a poultry slaughterhouse in southern Brazil with capacity for 20,000 animals per hour. Samples were collected at the end of the cutting phase, during preoperational cleaning: before the surfaces were washed; after washing with hot water and after washing with 2% sodium hydroxide detergent (Power Foam®, Johnson Diversey), rinsing and disinfection with 0.5% peracetic acid (Divosan Forte®, Johnson Diversey), 2% quaternary ammonium (Divosan Divoquat Forte®, Johnson Diversey), and 1% biguanide (Divosan Divosept 350®, Johnson Diversey). The following methods were used: Evancho et al. (3), Hitchins (6), and Ryser and Donnelly (11) for investigation of Listeria sp; Evancho et al. (3) and Lancette and Bennett (8) for counting Staphylococcus aureus, and Evancho et al. (3), Swanson et al. (15) and Kornacki and Johnson (7) for Escherichia coli.
The method for assessment of biofilm formation on polystyrene microtiter plates was based on the techniques described by Stepanovic et al. (13, 14), adapted for the analysis of Listeria sp (6 strains), Escherichia coli (9 strains) and Staphylococcus aureus (11 strains). The standard strains used were Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923. The strains were grown on tryptic soy agar (TSA) without dextrose (Difco) using 1.5% of agar, without glucose (0%), and on TSA supplemented with 0.5; 1; 1.5; 2; 2.5; 3; 3.5 and 4% of glucose, incubated at 36ºC for 24 hours and transferred to tryptic soy broth (TSB) without dextrose (Difco), with 0.5% of sodium chloride, using the same glucose concentrations and incubation at 36ºC for 24 hours. Thereafter, aliquots of the cultures were added to the TSB using the same glucose concentration until MacFarland scale 1 was obtained.
Later, 200 µL of each bacterial suspension were inoculated, in triplicate, onto 96-well, flat-bottomed sterile polystyrene microtiter plates (Cral). Non-inoculated TSB wells, in triplicate, at each glucose concentration, were used as negative controls. The plates were incubated at 36°C for 24 hours. The bacterial suspension was aspirated and each well was washed three times with 250 µL of sterile physiological saline at 0.9%. After that, the biofilm was fixed with 200 µL of methanol for 15 minutes, and later removed. The plates were dried at ambient temperature, stained with 200 µL of Hucker’s crystal violet solution at 2% for 5 minutes, washed in running water and dried at ambient temperature. Afterwards, absorbance was read using an ELISA plate reader (Rosys Anthos 2010) at 550 nm.
The optical density (ODs) of each strain was obtained by the arithmetic mean of the absorbance of three wells and this value was compared with the mean absorbance of negative controls (ODnc). The following classification was used for the determination of biofilm formation: no biofilm production (ODs≤ODnc), weak biofilm production (ODnc<ODs≤2.ODnc), moderate biofilm production (2.ODnc<ODs≤4.ODnc) and strong biofilm production (4.ODnc<ODs).
All Staphylococcus aureus strains analyzed produced biofilm on polystyrene at least at one of the concentrations used (Table 1).
Table 1.
Results for biofilm production on microtiter plates for Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria and Escherichia coli in TSB at different glucose concentrations.
| Tested media | No biofilm producers | Weak biofilm producers | Moderate biofilm producers | Strong biofilm producers | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.a. | L. | E.c | S.a. | L. | E.c | S.a. | L. | E.c | S.a. | L. | E.c | |
| TSB w/o G | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TSB + 0.5% G | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 1% G | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 1.5% G | 1 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 2% G | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 2.5% G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 3% G | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TSB + 3.5% G | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| TSB + 4% G | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
TSB: - Tryptic Soy Broth without dextrose – Difco; G: glucose.
S.a.: Staphylococcus aureus; L.: Listeria; E.c:Escherichia coli
By using the polystyrene microtiter plate method, it was possible to find out that all strains of Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli had the capacity to produce biofilm, even if they are weak producers, in at least one of the growth media tested.
Although hygiene conditions for food production have been continuously improved in food industries, outbreaks of listeriosis caused by the consumption of contaminated products may occur, and therefore, providing an effective control of Listeria spp. has been a challenge (5). The strains of L. monocytogenes and L. welshimeri analyzed were obtained from stainless steel tables and from polyurethane conveyors, and showed weak and moderate biofilm formation in TSB with different glucose concentrations, but especially in media with 2 to 4% of glucose. An L. monocytogenes strain isolated from the polyurethane conveyor was a strong biofilm producer in TSB with 3.5% of glucose. These results were consistent with those obtained by Stepanovic et al. (12), who concluded that L. monocytogenes produces more biofilm in nutrient-rich media.
The data obtained in this study are very important because they show that Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli isolated from surfaces in contact with foods in the cutting room of a poultry slaughterhouse can produce biofilm, which may cause the persistence of these microorganisms during food processing and consequently lead to greater risks of food contamination, jeopardizing consumers’ health. Further studies are still needed to determine on which surfaces and under which environmental conditions these microorganisms produce more biofilm.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We express our thanks to the Center for Food Research and to the Laboratory of Virology and Immunology of the School of Agronomics and Veterinary Medicine, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Brazil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Christensen G.D., Simpson W.A., Younger J.J., Baddour L.M., Barrett F.F., Melton D.M., Beachey E.H. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1985;22:996–1006. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deighton M.A., Balkau B. Adherence measured by microtiter assay as a virulence marker for Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990;28:2442–2447. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2442-2447.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Evancho G.M., Sveum W.H., Moberg L.J., Frank J.F. Microbiological monitoring of the food processing environment. In: Downes F.P., Ito K., editors. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 25–35. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fitzpatrick F., Humphreys H., O’Gara J.P. Evidence for ica ADBC-independent biofilm development mechanism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:1973–1976. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1973-1976.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harvey J., Keenana K.P., Gilmoura A. Assessing biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes strains. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:380–392. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hitchins A.D. Detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. BAM Bacteriological Analytical Manual. 2003 http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-10.html. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kornacki J.L., Johnson J.L. Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, and Escherichia coli as quality and safety indicators. In: Downes F.P., Ito K., editors. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 69–82. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lancette G.A., Bennett R.W. Staphylococcus aureusand staphylococcal enterotoxins. In: Downes F.P., Ito K., editors. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 387–403. [Google Scholar]
- 9.O’Gara J.P. ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007;270:179–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rode T.M., Langsrud S., Holck A., Moretro T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;116(3):372–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ryser E.T., Donnelly C.W. Listeria. In: Downes F.P., Ito K., editors. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 343–356. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stepanovic S., Irkovic I.C., Ranin L., Svabic´-Vlahovic M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;38:428–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stepanovic S., Vukovic D., Dakic I., Savic B., Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2000;40:175–179. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00122-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stepanovic S., Vukovic D., Hola V., Bonaventura G., Djukic S., Irkovic I.C., Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS. 2007;71(5):687–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swanson K.M.J., Petran R.L., Hanlin J.H. Culture methods for enumeration of microorganisms. In: Downes F.P., Ito K., editors. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 53–62. [Google Scholar]
