Abstract
The immunogenic response of mice vaccinated intranasally or subcutaneously with increasing doses of a purified, concentrated intact A2/Taiwan influenza vaccine or its Tween-ether derived vaccines was compared. Immunogenicity was measured by serum neutralization and hemagglutination-inhibition antibodies, lung lesions scores, and protection against respiratory challenge with live airborne influenza virus. Intact (untreated) vaccine, Tween-ether-treated (ET) vaccine, and the isolated hemagglutinins (HA) provided protection and stimulated homologous antibody response at the 35- and 70-chicken cell agglutination (CCA) unit level. At a lower dosage level, the vaccines administered by the subcutaneous route appeared to confer better protection. The ET vaccine was superior to intact virus or HA vaccines when administered subcutaneously. The minimum amount of the HA and intact vaccine given subcutaneously that protected mice against respiratory challenge was 7 CCA units (3.5 units injected twice) compared to 0.7 CCA units (0.35 units injected twice) for the ET vaccine. No heterologous antibody to the A/PR/8/34 or B/Mass/3/66 was noted. Low-level serum-neutralizing antibody was found against the A2/Japan/170 strain but, despite high levels of homologous A2/Taiwan/64 antibody, no cross-reactivity was found with the recent A2/Hong Kong/68 variant.
Full text
PDF






Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brandon F. B., Barrett C. D., Jr, Hook A. E., Lease G. O. Human febrile response to influenza virus or its ether isolated hemagglutinins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Jul;125(3):683–686. doi: 10.3181/00379727-125-32180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown P., Gajdusek D. C., Morris J. A. Antigenic response to influenza virus in man. I. Neutralizing antibody response to inactivated monovalent A2 vaccine as related to prior influenza exposure. Am J Epidemiol. 1969 Oct;90(4):327–335. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DAVENPORT F. M., HENNESSY A. V., BRANDON F. M., WEBSTER R. G., BARRETT C. D., Jr, LEASE G. O. COMPARISONS OF SEROLOGIC AND FEBRILE RESPONSES IN HUMANS TO VACCINATION WITH INFLUENZA A VIRUSES OR THEIR HEMAGGLUTININS. J Lab Clin Med. 1964 Jan;63:5–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DULL H. B., JENSEN K. E., RAKICH J. H., COHEN A., HENDERSON D. A., PIRKLE C. I. Monovalent Asian influenza vaccine: evaluation of its use during two waves of epidemic Asian influenza in partly immunized penitentiary population. J Am Med Assoc. 1960 Mar 19;172:1223–1229. doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020120001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAZEKAS de ST GROTH S., DONNELLEY M. Studies in experimental immunology of influenza. IV. The protective value of active immunization. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1950 Jan;28(1):61–75. doi: 10.1038/icb.1950.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAZEKAS de ST GROTH S. Influenza: a study in mice. Lancet. 1950 Jun 17;1(6616):1101–1105. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)91904-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francis T., Jr A RATIONALE FOR STUDIES IN THE CONTROL OF EPIDEMIC INFLUENZA. Science. 1943 Mar 12;97(2515):229–235. doi: 10.1126/science.97.2515.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebeka E. K., Walker R. M., Beardmore W. B. Automated procedure for measuring antigenicity of extracted and intact influenza virus. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Nov;16(11):1699–1705. doi: 10.1128/am.16.11.1699-1705.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennessy A. V., Davenport F. M. Relative antigenic potency in man of polyvalent influenza virus vaccines containing isolated hemagglutinins or intact viruses. J Immunol. 1966 Aug;97(2):235–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JENSEN K. E., WOODHOUR A. F., BAILEY A. A. Immunization with polyvalent influenza vaccines. J Am Med Assoc. 1960 Mar 19;172:1230–1238. doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020120008002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaye H. S., Dowdle W. R., McQueen J. L. Studies on inactivated influenza vaccines. I. The effect of dosage on antibody response and protection against homotypic and heterotypic influenza virus challenge in mice. Am J Epidemiol. 1969 Aug;90(2):162–169. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MEIKLEJOHN G. N. Asian influenza vaccination:dosage, routes, schedules of inoculation, and reactions. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961 Feb;83(2):175–177. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.2P2.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neurath A. R., Rubin B. A., Hartzell R. W. Release of neuraminidase from hemagglutinins caused by treatment of influenza viruses with ether. (Brief report). Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1969;28(3):421–423. doi: 10.1007/BF01240956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peck F. B., Jr Purified influenza virus vaccine. A study of viral reactivity and antigenicity. JAMA. 1968 Dec 2;206(10):2277–2282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimer C. B., Baker R. S., Van Frank R. M., Newlin T. E., Cline G. B., Anderson N. G. Purification of large quantities of influenza virus by density gradient centrifugation. J Virol. 1967 Dec;1(6):1207–1216. doi: 10.1128/jvi.1.6.1207-1216.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SEVER J. L. Application of a microtechnique to viral serological investigations. J Immunol. 1962 Mar;88:320–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulman J. L., Khakpour M., Kilbourne E. D. Protective effects of specific immunity to viral neuraminidase on influenza virus infection of mice. J Virol. 1968 Aug;2(8):778–786. doi: 10.1128/jvi.2.8.778-786.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
